Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHK Agenda - 2019-11-051 KrTc.��r ER Office of the City Clerk Kitchener City Hall 200 King St.W. - 2nd Floor Kitchener ON N2G 4G7 Page 1 *** REVISED *** Heritage Kitchener Agenda Tuesday, November 5, 2019 4:00 p.m. - 6:00 p.m. Conestoga Room (Main Floor) Chair — Ms. A. Reid Vice -Chair — Mr. S. Strohack Delegations Pursuant to Council's Procedural By-law, delegations are permitted to address the Committee for a maximum of five (5) minutes. • Item 1 - Dan Jackson Discussion Items 1. DSD -19-247 - Heritage Permit Application — HPA-2019-V-028 (25 min) - 8 Devon Street - Alteration and Conversion of a Single Detached Dwelling into a Duplex *2. Draft Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) (30 min) - 19-41 Mill Street (This matter is being deferred for consideration to Heritage Kitchener on December 3, 2019) 3. DSD -19-249 - Notice of Intention to Amend Designating By-law 84-52 - 883 Doon Village Road 4. Status Updates - Heritage Best Practices Update and 2019 Priorities - Heritage Impact Assessment Follow-ups Information Items • Heritage Permit Application Tracking Sheet Dianna Saunderson Committee Administrator (25 min) (5 min) ** Accessible formats and communication supports are available upon request. If you require assistance to take part in a city meeting or event, please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 ** Staff Report Ki -�-R DevefopmentServices Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Heritage Kitchener DATE OF MEETING: November 5, 2019 SUBMITTED BY: Brandon Sloan, Manager of Long Range & Policy Planning, 519-741-2200 ext. 7684 PREPARED BY: Leon Bensason, Coordinator, Cultural Heritage Planning (519) 741-2200 x7306 WARD (S) INVOLVED: Ward 9 DATE OF REPORT: October 17, 2019 REPORT NO.: DSD -19-247 SUBJECT: Heritage Permit Application HPA-2019-V-029 8 Devon Street Alteration and conversion of a single detached dwelling into a duplex RECOMMENDATION: THAT pursuant to Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Heritage Permit Application HPA-2019- V-029 be approved to permit the alteration and conversion of a single detached dwelling located on property municipally addressed as 8 Devon Street into a duplex, in accordance with the plans and supplementary information submitted with the application and subject to the following conditions: That a test panel of the proposed masonry work including brick infilling and repointing, be undertaken to the satisfaction of Heritage Planning staff before proceeding with such work on the entire building; and further, 2. That the final building permit drawings be reviewed and heritage clearance be provided by Heritage Planning staff prior to the issuance of a building permit. Location Map: 8 Devon Street *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. 1-1 BACKGROUND: The Development Services Department is in receipt of Heritage Permit Application HPA-2019-V-029 which is seeking permission to alter and convert an existing single detached dwelling into a duplex, located on property municipally addressed as 8 Devon Street. The subject property is designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act by virtue of its location within the Victoria Park Area Heritage Conservation District (VPAHCD). Context The subject property is located on the north side of Devon Street between Henry Street and Park Street. It is one of only four residential properties making up the Devon Street streetscape. The south side of Devon Street (opposite the subject property) is occupied with natural vegetation, screening a parking lot serving Victoria Park. F r.. � r Nft ... % S Aerial image of the Devon Street Streetscape While the Victoria Park Area Heritage Conservation District Study suggests that 8 Devon Street is a c.1920s residence built in the Berlin Vernacular tradition; the fire insurance atlas from 1925 does not show any residential development on the north side of Devon Street. A review of the Vernon's Directories suggests the building likely dates to c.1932-33. The two storey single detached dwelling occupies most of the .03 acre sized lot. The lot itself features a significant change in grade with the low end at Devon Street and rising well over a metre toward the rear yard. An approximately one metre high interlocking style concrete retaining wall occupies most of the frontage on Devon Street. 1-2 Existing south facing (front) elevation of 8 Devon Street The residence is constructed of red -brown brick of slightly varying shades. The concrete foundation is painted white and features a veneer laid in a random ashlar pattern. Building elevations have concrete sills and headers, hung wood windows of varying sizes and patterns, metal awnings above some windows, white metal cladding on hipped roof dormers and on a westerly addition which includes a single car garage with metal door. The front elevation also features a primary entry accessed through a central covered enclave, and a secondary access door located off center flush with the fagade. The residence, which has been previously altered and added onto, does not conform to any one architectural style, and forms part of a streetscape which, unlike most other stable residential areas within the HCD, lacks a degree of continuity. Part of the Devon Street streetscape 1-3 REPORT: The applicant proposes to alter the existing single detached dwelling to, in part, make the building more accessible for an aging family member. Previous design concepts were presented to Heritage Kitchener in August and September 2019, and have since been revised to address some of the comments made by the committee. The complete scope of work proposed is outlined in the description and plans submitted with the heritage permit application attached as Appendix `A' to this report, and can be summarized as follows: Ground Floor The applicant intends to establish ground floor access by removing most of the existing street facing retaining wall and exposing the ground level foundation where a new primary entrance would be located in place of the existing single garage. A new poured concrete retaining wall would support the east side elevation and border a new stamped concrete driveway leading to a new 2 door garage. The new main entry would feature an eight foot high oak entry door and sidelights salvaged from another building. The width of the entry door at 42 inches, would address the accessibility needs of the tenant. A new two door garage would be located toward the east and feature 8x7 foot wood garage doors painted a medium brown to match the brick facade. The intent is to have the garage doors blend in with the brick fagade. The applicant advises that the positioning of the garage doors adjacent the new east elevation retaining wall will create a visual block when viewed from the east. In addition, it is suggested that the positioning of a proposed verandah above the new garage will cast a natural shadow that will help to further minimize the visual impact of the garage doors. A new pathway consisting of interlocking stone would span the area from the sidewalk to the new main entry door. The space between the pathway and driveway at ground level would be landscaped. Second Floor & Roof Level A new covered verandah is proposed to be constructed on the second floor. The verandah would be constructed of wood millwork painted beige and feature a flat roof. The verandah would be positioned to frame the garage doors below and then step back slightly as it extends toward the west. The existing 3 part wood window on the second floor (behind the proposed verandah) would be replaced with a new beige vinyl window in the same 3 part style. The existing entry enclave would be infilled with salvaged brick and feature double wood doors with 3/4 glazing, providing access to the new verandah. Further west on the front fagade, existing windows and the secondary entry door would also be infilled with salvaged brick. The front fagade of the metal clad addition to the west is proposed to be reclad in salvaged brick, and a small existing window would be replaced with a new beige 3 part vinyl window, matching the same window proposed to be installed toward the east. The only change at roof level is the replacement of the existing dormer windows with new beige vinyl windows in the same openings. Masonry Considerations The applicant advises that they have sought the advice of an experienced mason and propose to remove original brick from the rear elevation of the building, and use the salvaged brick to infill areas on the front fagade. The front fagade would then be repointed to achieve a uniform look and finish. A non-combustible siding resembling wood would be used to re -clad areas where original brick has been removed from the rear elevation. 1-4 Proposed south elevation Heritage Planning Staff Comments The VPAHCD Plan contains Building Conversion Policies and Building Conservation Guidelines to help guide proposed conversions and alterations (see Appendix `B' for Building Conversion Policies). The policies were prepared in anticipation of such conversions occurring in areas of transition, such as on Queen Street South. Policies reference that conversions should not remove key historic features; should conserve or introduce domestic scale landscaping; and in the case of commercial conversions encourage parking to be located to the rear, and introduce signage that is complementary in design and blends in with the scale and proportions of the historic building. In reviewing the merits of the subject application, heritage planning staff make the following comments and observations: • Devon Street is a short one-way street. Only 4 properties occupy the entire street with either frontage or flanking side yards. The streetscape lacks architectural continuity, and unlike most other low rise residential areas within the VPAHCD, properties on Devon Street already feature street facing garages or carports. While the HCD Plan conversion policies call for driveway access to be kept to a single lane where possible, the existing building at 8 Devon Street occupies a significant amount of lot area and frontage on the lot, and there is a change in elevation from front to rear yard. This limits the opportunity to have a driveway that accommodates tandem (double length) parking. While a two door garage is uncommon within the HCD (there are a few examples), the proposed design is not out of proportion with the building given its width, and not out of place on Devon Street given other 1-5 �III'111111-111• = uEJ�I�I•I•�RN77 ZZ­ IIII IIII IIII _ _� � I-II =IIII IIII III,=�_I -1■I■I Ilii- _I i 0000"-0000-- —uu ®111 000_0000,_ SOUTH ELEVATION Proposed south elevation Heritage Planning Staff Comments The VPAHCD Plan contains Building Conversion Policies and Building Conservation Guidelines to help guide proposed conversions and alterations (see Appendix `B' for Building Conversion Policies). The policies were prepared in anticipation of such conversions occurring in areas of transition, such as on Queen Street South. Policies reference that conversions should not remove key historic features; should conserve or introduce domestic scale landscaping; and in the case of commercial conversions encourage parking to be located to the rear, and introduce signage that is complementary in design and blends in with the scale and proportions of the historic building. In reviewing the merits of the subject application, heritage planning staff make the following comments and observations: • Devon Street is a short one-way street. Only 4 properties occupy the entire street with either frontage or flanking side yards. The streetscape lacks architectural continuity, and unlike most other low rise residential areas within the VPAHCD, properties on Devon Street already feature street facing garages or carports. While the HCD Plan conversion policies call for driveway access to be kept to a single lane where possible, the existing building at 8 Devon Street occupies a significant amount of lot area and frontage on the lot, and there is a change in elevation from front to rear yard. This limits the opportunity to have a driveway that accommodates tandem (double length) parking. While a two door garage is uncommon within the HCD (there are a few examples), the proposed design is not out of proportion with the building given its width, and not out of place on Devon Street given other 1-5 existing garages and a carport. As noted by the applicant, the new east elevation retaining wall and verandah above may assist in minimizing overall visual impact. This, in combination with the relative seclusion of Devon Street within the HCD, suggests the impact of the proposed 2 door garage will be relatively muted and within acceptable range. • The existing detached dwelling has been previously altered and added onto and does not conform to any particular architectural style. As such, staff do not believe the proposed alterations will disrupt or remove key architectural features. The proposed removal of the retaining wall along the street frontage; introduction of a second storey verandah; and installation of at grade landscaping, are all positive contributions to both the property and streetscape. The proposal to remove original brick and reclad areas on the rear elevation with a non- combustible wood -look siding will not impact views from the public realm. Use of the salvaged brick to infill areas on the front fagade provides the best opportunity to create a uniform appearance, but requires great care in execution from an experienced brick mason. In accordance with the Heritage Permit Application form, the approval of an application under the Ontario Heritage Act shall not be a waiver of any of the provisions of any by-law of the City of Kitchener or legislation, including but not limited to, the requirements of the Ontario Building Code and Zoning By-law. In this regard, staff confirm that a variance to zoning by-law regulations (to legalize yard setbacks and parking) and a building permit, will be required. ALIGNMENT WITH CITY OF KITCHENER STRATEGIC PLAN: The recommendation of this report supports the achievement of the City's strategic vision through the delivery of core service. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: N/A COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the Heritage Kitchener committee meeting. CONSULT — Heritage Kitchener has been consulted regarding the subject Heritage Permit application. ACKNOWLEDGED BY: Alain Pinard, Director of Planning APPENDIX A: Heritage Permit Application HPA-2019-V-029 APPENDIX B: Victoria Park Area Heritage Conservation District Plan Building Conversion Policies 1-6 APPENDIX'A' HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION & SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS y _ Planning Division — 200 King Street West, 611 Floor P.O. Box 1118, Kitchener ON N2G 4G7 519-741-2426; plan ning(o)kitchener.ca STAFF USE ONLY Date Received: Accepted By: Application Number: H PA -2019 - PART B: HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION FORM 1. NATURE OF APPLICATION Vxterior ❑ Interior ❑ Signage ❑ Demolition ❑ New Construction ❑ Alteration ❑ Relocation 2. SUBJECT PROPERTY Municipal Address: 8 Devon St. Kitchener, ON Legal Description (if know): N0.8 Devon Street, PIN 22429-0151(LT') Building/Structure Type: VResidential ❑ Commercial ❑ Industrial ❑ Institutional Heritage Designation: ❑ Part IV (Individual) Vpart V (Heritage Conservation District) Is the property subject to a Heritage Easement or Agreement? ❑ Yes No 3. PROPERTY OWNER Name Address: City/Province/Postal Code: Phone: Email: N/A 4. AGENT (if applicable) Name: Company: Address: City/Province/Postal Code:_ Phone: Email: 2019 City of Kitchener — Heritage Permit Application & Submission Requirements Page 7 of 9 1-7 5. WRITTEN DESCRIPTION Provide a written description of the project including any conservation methods proposed. Provide such detail as materials to be used, measurements, paint colours, decorative details, whether any original building fabric is to be removed or replaced, etc. Use additional pages as required. Please refer to the City of Kitchener Heritage Permit Application Submission Guidelines for further direction. Please see provided full scope presentation REVIEW OF CITY OF KITCHENER HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMISSION GUIDELINES Describe why it is necessary to undertake the proposed work: Changes being made to property are to accomodate multi generation family living and access for mobility/visually impaired owner. _ Describe how the proposal is consistent with the Part IV individual designating by-law or the Part V Heritage Conservation District Plan: Through discussions with heritage staff as well as feedback from multiple presenations to the heritage committee this Rroposal has been refined to address as many heritagee.preservation measures as possible. Describe how the proposal is consistent with Parks Canada's Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (www. historicplaces.ca/en/paces/standards-normes.aspx): Please see above 7. PROPOSED WORKS a) Expected start date: Nov 6/2019 Expected completion date b) Have you discussed this work with Heritage Planning Staff? _J Yes - If yes, who did you speak to? Leon Bensason Jan 31/2020 ❑ Nfi c) Have you discussed this work with Building Division Staff? _ Yes [..'� No - If yes, who did you speak to? Pre -Submission facilitated by Tim Seyler d) Have you applied for a Building Permit for this work? El Yes Na e) Other related Building or Planning applications: F L�1:V [6]'JI4=1Bic] =11,91 kTH Application number The undersigned acknowledges that all of the statements contained in documents filed in support of this application shall be deemed part of this application. The undersigned acknowledges that receipt of this application by the City of Kitchener - Planning Division does not guarantee it to be a `complete' application. The undersigned acknowledges that the Council of the City of Kitchener shall determine whether the information submitted forms a complete application. Further review of the application will be undertaken and the owner or agent may be contacted to provide additional information and/or resolve any discrepancies or issues with the application as submitted. Once the application is deemed to be fully complete, the application will be processed and, if necessary, scheduled for the next available Heritage Kitchener committee and Council meeting. Submission of this application constitutes consent for authorized municipal staff to enter upon the subject property for the purpose of conducting site visits, including taking photographs, which are 2019 City of Kitchener — Heritage Permit Application & Submission Requirements Page 8 of 9 11 i necessary for the evaluation of this application. The undersigned acknowledges that where an agent has been identified, the municipality is authorized but not required to contact this person in lieu of the owner and this person is authorized to act on behalf of the owner for all matters respecting the application. The undersigned agrees that the proposed work shall be done in accordance with this application and understands that the approval of this application under the Ontario Heritage Act shall not be a waiver of any of the provisions of any by-law of the City of Kitchener or legislation including but not limited to the requirements of the Building Code and the Zoning By-law. The undersigned acknowledges that in the event this application is approved, any departure from the conditions imposed by the Council of the City of Kitchener or from the plans or specifications approved by the Council of the City of Kitchener is prohibited and could result in a fine being imposed or imprisonment as provided for under the Ontario Heritage Act. Signature of Owner/Agent Date: Sept 27/2019 Signature of Owner/Agent: Date: Sept 27/2019 6. AUTHORIZATION If this application is being made by an agent on behalf of the property owner, the following authorization must be completed: I /We, _ owner of the land that is subject of this application, hereby authorize Signature of Owner/Agent: Signature of Owner/Agent: to act on my / our behalf in this regard. Date: Sept 27/2019 Date: Sept 27/2019 The personal information on this form is collected under the legal authority of Section 33(2), Section 42(2), and Section 42(2.2) of the Ontario Heritage Act. The information will be used for the purposes of administering the Heritage Permit Application and ensuring appropriate service of notice of receipt under Section 33(3) and Section 42(3) of the Ontario Heritage Act. If you have any questions about this collection of personal information, please contact the Manager of Corporate Records, Legislated Services Division, City of Kitchener (519-741-2769). STAFF USE ONLY Application Number:,_ Application Received:_ Application Complete: Notice of Receipt: Notice of Decision: 90 -Day Expiry Date: PROCESS: ❑ Heritage Planning Staff: ❑ Heritage Kitchener: ❑ Council: 2019 City of Kitchener — Heritage Permit Application & Submission Requirements Page 9 of 9 1-9 Devon St. Heritage Application - Purposed Alteration Procedures 1. Grading change -It is our intention to remove most of the street facing retaining wall and elevation backfill to expose the ground level foundation wall. This process is to allow for increased ground level entry access to the home. After the elevation change is complete we will construct a new poured concrete retaining wall that will support the east side elevation and will border a new poured/stamped concrete driveway. This driveway will provide street access to 2 - 8 foot by 7 foot garage doors on the street facing portion of the newly exposed ground floor wall. 2. Garage Relocation - While assessing the new garage position we took into account the visibility of the doors and their position on the house. We have addressed this in 3 specific ways to minimize the overall visual impact of the doors. 1. The doors will be painted a medium brown colour derived directly from one of the heritage bricks used to veneer the home. Our intention is to have the doors blend in with the brick facade of the home rather than being a visual feature. 2. The position of the doors being adjacent to the new east elevation retaining wall will create a natural visual block. This will assist to minimize the visual impact of the east most door from viewing angle of Park St./Jubilee Drive and the entrance to Victoria Park. 3. We will be constructing a veranda that spans the entire distance above the 2 doors and comes 5 feet out from the front facade. This veranda will serve to draw visual attention away from the doors as well as casting a natural shadow that will help to further minimize the visual impact of the garage doors. 3. Veranda - The veranda will be constructed of wood millwork that will include chamfered posts, millwork pickets, and millwork rails. All millwork will be painted in heritage beige colour to create visual appeal consistent with heritage conservation guidelines. We have imposed the following details in efforts to enhance the weighting of the millwork in following with the heritage tone of the houses common to the park. 1. Posts - 7 %" x 7'/4" wood with 1" chamfer detail 2. Top rails - 4'/2" x 5'/4" wood with rounded top 3. Bottom rails - 3'/2" high wood. 4. Pickets - 1 3/4" wood spaced at 5 '/2" oc. 5. Facia board - 6" wood 6. Frieze boards - 8" wood on wall below and 6" wood on outside floor. 7. Decorative support brackets - 60" x 36" x 7 '/4" wood 8. All millwork painted heritage beige in colour. 1-10 - The veranda will step back slightly at the west side from 60" to 40" to transition to the wall. The fascia and frieze board details will continue west along the wall with a build out distance of 20" to create cohesion with the built -out millwork over the new entryway system. - Above the Veranda will be a roof covering that will mirror all of the same weighting and millwork features. It will have a non visible waterproof membrane and front fascia board with drip edge detail to give cover from the elements for year round use. 4. Main Entryway - A lot of consideration was taken in an effort to create a functional yet visually appealing focal point to the home. We needed to accommodate an opening of at least 40" for mobility impared access. We have sourced an exquisitely handcrafted solid oak wood entry system that was recovered from a heritage building. The entry consists of a relaimed (from a heritage home) arched 8 foot 42" door with matching 23" multi window sidelites and solid brass hardware. We feel that the craftsmanship and visual appeal of this entry will further help to draw visual attention away from the garage doors while tying the veranda into a more uniform esthetic. 5. Masonry Considerations - In our effort to create a more uniform esthetic while maintaining the heritage integrity of the front facade we have gone to great lengths to recover the original brick from the rear of the home to be reused on the front. The existing front facing brick will be repointed to ensure a uniform mortar colour and finish. Great care from an experienced brick mason will be taken to ensure that the finished product will look uniform and render the filled openings unnoticeable. 6. Front Landscaping - All plants will be recovered from existing elevation and reused in the area between the new entryway and driveway. A pathway consisting of interlocking stone will span the area from the sidewalk to the entry door giving a pleasant and inviting a visual dynamic to the new ground level landscape. �eayw pC• :meis we ti. �pN`G vQea cx a s -� yxco v.cz axs .a ruc nn. n�,a uasue ys uesueo ac �`� �f s yy y3@� gp a lQCtl@ 6+ 6 Hi!@� Ing= � 11[s 11 1 e� P� L 3SVHd - SNOUVn313 O3SOdO2Jd 9 OMY1N0'k13N3HO11N 4 i g 133111$ NOA30 9 r e ...r iwF!■Ji alf1,1Q if i�gE a� d 6 Ei a9 a2 .• '�.i .S :� ��. •i Sly fiN5 dYN w re veep '�s1u Y Au [I I�3Bol g6�: JO trivia ails e O1-O'N3N3HODX C � o ;$ 13aais rvonao a 1 i i 11 eZ Y G U n }m 2 g W W r Own I � � z CSN Nd�o� ;' ]49 �atolJee tsnjf,Osa[cNgF� o >�r' yp LOCI z C N o VO U � 1 i \ \ f J Q ? Z 0 ;,f, W 0 QV 08ow 'r GIZ Z4 � o Ww N W z Z — W v �a Hz �o S Y� "s 0 Lli U- Oz o WW Z q VSa`o W._U a' L Y z Y G U n }m 2 g W W r Own I � � z CSN Nd�o� ;' ]49 �atolJee tsnjf,Osa[cNgF� o >�r' yp LOCI z C N o VO U � 1 i \ \ f J Q ? Z 0 ;,f, W 0 QV 08ow 'r GIZ Z4 APPENDIX'S' BUILDING CONVERSIONS BUILDING CONSERVATION POLICY Nicholas Hill Architect. Planner The original building style has been conserved. The verandah has been restored and creates a positive image for the business. The front garden is beautifully kept, contributing to the street- scape as a whole. The sign is effective and discreetly positioned within the landscape. Car parking is at the rear of the building thus conserving the front landscaping. Converting a building from one use to another occurs frequently. In the Victoria Park Area former factories have been converted to housing and houses to offices, such as the Bullas Travel Agency at 254 Queen Street South, shown above. It is important that conversions conserve the character and architectural style of the original building. This will mean compatible integration and signage. The integration that made Bullas Travel a successful conversion is noted above. 63 Victoria Part Area Heritage Conserlon Di 1 A BUILDING CONVERSIONS INTRODUCTION The conversion of buildings from one use to another occurs mainly in areas of transition, such as Queen Street South. Examples include the duplexing of a single family residence, conversion of a residence to an office, or in cases where a building such as a factory becomes obsolete and new compatible uses are sought to renew its value. It is considered important that conversion be achieved in a manner that strengthens the character and continuity of the historic area Unless carefully addressed, areas in transition can become fragmented, uneven and rundown. The result is a serious loss of urban quality and Area value. The key objectives are to integrate conversion and building changes into the prevailing historic and landscape character of the building and setting. Building conversions in the Victoria Park Area may require application to the LACAC and approval by Kitchener City Council. POLICIES Building Conversions shall be achieved so as not to disrupt or remove key features or introduce new features not in keeping with the historic building style. A clear distinction between old and new building design is encouraged, while still achieving a compatible blend. Landscaping Original front garden landscaping should be conserved and enhanced. If it is a house conversion, a domestic scale landscape shall be achieved with shrubs and flower borders. Access The access driveway shall be kept single lane where possible. Parking Priority shall be given to locating car parking at the rear of the building with the provision of a drop-off space in front or to the side if required. A privacy fence or hedge should be located around the carpark so as not to disturb neighbours. It shall comply with applicable by- laws. Large areas of asphalt in front of the building are strongly discouraged. Signage Priority should be given to attaching the sign to the building, rather than installing a free-standing sign. 64 Victoria Part Area Heritage Conserralpi#rsw The building attached sign shall fit and blend in with the scale and proportions of the historic building. Where free-standing signage is required, a low profile is encouraged that integrates with the landscape. It shall not visually dominate or overwhelm the historic building. Signage materials and style shall complement the historic building, such as painted wood with classic lettering. Back -lit and plastic style signage shall be discouraged. Guidelines The Building Conservation Guidelines shall apply to conversion. 65 Victoria Part Area Heritage conseraw m4tfiw Internal memo Development Services Department Date: October 22, 2019 To: Members of Heritage Kitchener From: Victoria Grohn, Heritage Planner cc: Subject: 19-41 Mill Street Draft Heritage Impact Assessment I wR wwwkitchener. ca The Planning Division is in receipt of a draft Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) dated August 14, 2019 and revised October 10, 2019 prepared by CHC Limited, regarding a proposal to redevelop 19-41 Mill Street. The subject property is adjacent to 45 Mill Street, which is designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act, and 541-561 Queen Street South, which are designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act and forming part of the Victoria Park Area Heritage Conservation District (VPAHCD). The applicant proposes to demolish the dwellings located on 19, 25, 29, 33, 37, and 41 Mill Street (which have no heritage status) and construct an 8 and 10 storey multiple residential building. The applicant and heritage consultant will be in attendance at the November 51" meeting of Heritage Kitchener to present the draft HIA and answer questions. Heritage Planning staff will be seeking the committee's input and comments which will be taken into consideration as part of staff's review of the HIA and the processing of the associated planning applications. A motion or recommendation to Council is not required. Relevant pages from the draft HIA are attached to this memo. The full draft HIA will be made available under separate cover on the City's website. L). CA,--� Victoria Grohn, BES Heritage Planner Acknowledged by: Brandon Sloan, Manger of Long Range & Policy Planning 2-1 DRAFT Scoped Heritage Impact Assessment in support of Proposed OPA, Zone Change and Site Plan Applications 19 - 41 Mill Street, Kitchener CHC Limited 87 Liverpool Street, Guelph, ON NIH 2L2 (519) 824-3210 oscott87krogers.com August 14, 2019, revised October 10, 2019 2-2 Scoped Heritage Impact Assessment 19 - 41 Mill Street. Kitchener Table of Contents 1.0 BACKGROUND - REQUIREMENT for a HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT (HIA) ........ 1 2.0 HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT REQUIREMENTS ................................ 3 2.1 Present owner contact information ............................................. 3 2.2 Site history (omitted) ........................................................ 3 2.3 Description of natural heritage elements, landscaping and surrounding context (omitted) ' . 3 2.4 Documentation of the heritage resource (omitted) '................................ 3 2.5 Outline of proposed development and its context and how it will impact the cultural heritage resources and neighbouring properties ............................. 3 2.6 Conservation - options and mitigation .......................................... 28 2.7 Summary of conservation principles and how they will be used ..................... 30 2.8 Proposed demolition/alterations (omitted) '..................................... 31 2.9 Recommendations justified and explained ...................................... 31 2.10 Qualifications of the author completing the Heritage Impact Assessment .............. 32 3.0 SUMMARY STATEMENT and CONSERVATION RECOMMENDATIONS ................ 32 4.0 MANDATORY RECOMMENDATION (omitted)' ..................................... 32 REFERENCES......................................................................... 33 Appendix 1 - City of Kitchener Development Services Department - Planning Division Scoped Site Specific Heritage Impact Assessment Terms of Reference, 19-41 Mill Street - Request for Revised HLA Terms of Reference - March 13, 2018 Appendix 2 - BY-LAWNUMBER91-136 designating part of 45 Mill Street in the City of Kitchener as being of historical and architectural value Appendix 3 - Shadow Study Appendix 4 - Qualifications of the Author All photographs taken by the author June 11, 2014, May 9, 2018, and July 2019 unless otherwise noted. ' Per City of Kitchener Development Services Department - Planning Division Scoped Site Specific Heritage ImpactAssessmentTermsofReference, 19-41 Mill Street- RequestforRevisedHIATerms ofReference-March 13, 2018 CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised October 10, 2019 2-3 LIST of FIGURES Figure 1 - subject property in the context of Victoria Park -Area Heritage Conservation District Plan .... 1 Figure 2 - 45 Mill Street, Part IV designation ................................................ 3 Figure 3 - subject property location map .................................................... 3 Figure 4 - view towards subject property from Schneider Haus................................... 4 Figure 5 - entrance to Schneider Ave at Queen St. S ............................................ 4 Figure 6 - Mill Street from Queen Street South ............................................... 4 Figure 7 - houses opposite subject property on Mill St .......................................... 4 Figure 8 - houses adjacent subject property on Mill St .......................................... 4 Figure 9 - view of 14 -storey apartment from subject property ................................... 4 Figure 10- Iron Horse Trail looking east .................................................... 5 Figure 11 - Iron Horse Trail looking west .................................................... 5 Figure 12- park land opposite subject property ................................................ 5 Figure 13 - park land opposite subject property ................................................ 5 Figure 14- Schneider Haus parking lot opposite subject property .................................. 5 Figure 15 - demolition adjacent Schneider Haus............................................... 5 Figure 16- subject property from Mill Street ................................................. 5 Figure 17- subject property environs........................................................ 6 Figure 18 - subject property environs........................................................ 7 Figure 19- excerpt from Schedule 86 -Zoning Map ............................................. 8 Figure 20 - excerpt from Urban Design Guidelines, Queen Street Mixed Use Corridor ................. 9 Figure 21- Site Plan .................................................................... 10 Figure 22 - view from Queen Street........................................................ 11 Figure 23 - Looking north on Mill Street .................................................... 12 Figure 24 - from Iron Horse Trans Canada Trail .............................................. 13 Figure 25 - from Mill Street.............................................................. 14 Figure 26 - Alternative Materials Concept - view from Queen Street .............................. 15 Figure 27 - Alternative Materials Concept - looking north on Mill Street ........................... 16 Figure 28 - Alternative Materials Concept - from Iron Horse Trans Canada Trail .................... 17 Figure 29 - Alternative Materials Concept - from Mill Street .................................... 18 Figure 30 - north and south elevations...................................................... 19 Figure 31 - east and west elevations........................................................ 20 Figure 32 - apartments in the neighbourhood................................................. 21 Figure 33 - VPAHCD properties on Queen Street South and Iron Horse Tower opposite .............. 22 Figure 34 - existing view - Mill Street from Queen Street ....................................... 23 Figure 35 - proposed view from Queen Street ................................................ 23 Figure 36 - 45 Mill Street - distance from designated parts to property line ......................... 24 Figure 37 - 45 Mill Street & subject property ................................................. 24 Figure 38 - from 57 Mill Street looking north ................................................ 25 Figure 39 - from 57 Mill Street looking north ................................................ 25 Figure 40 - view from Schneider Haus towards subject property .................................. 26 Figure 41- angular plane study............................................................ 27 CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised October 10, 2019 2-4 Scoped Heritage Impact Assessment 1 19 - 41 Mill Street, Kitchener 1.0 BACKGROUND - REQUIREMENT for a HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT (HIA) The subject property at 19 - 41 Mill Street is 0.76 ha (1.9 acres) in area and is adjacent to the Victoria Park Area Heritage Conservation District (VPAHCD) (Figure 1), designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act; and to 45 Mill Street (Figure 2), designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act; and therefore, development / redevelopment is subject to an HIA requirement. 1u�[ r. �c TIIES boundary or the Heritage Consemlion Disteict designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act. Area excluded Irusn Part V designation., 112 Benton Street; 2A, Z6,300,346 Ceurtiand Avenue Fan; 22,35 Courtland Avenue West; 82* Hans Avenue; x8#,163" ]vAph Streot; _'- So 13-15 09k Street-, 242, 214 , 347', 564 Qum Strw South; 236 Roland Avenue, 179,430, 76* Schneider Avenue, 1004 Water Street South; lr1i a Water Street South 173 Heins Ave. Dates property designated under Part IV orthe Ontario Heritage Act. Joseph Schneider Hairs - National Historic Site, Regionally Significant Heritage Resource Figure 1 adapted from: Victoria Park Heritage Conservation District Plan - Nicholas Hill 1996 The Victoria Park Area Heritage Conservation District Plan does not address new building adjacent the VPAHCD. The Plan does speak to conserving the heritage character and human scale of residential areas within the District while encouraging compatible infill and intensification and the Plan provides additional guidance specifically related to the Queen Street South corridor which is also adjacent the subject property. As well, the CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised October 10, 2019 2-5 Scoped Heritage Impact Assessment 2 19 - 41 Mill Street, Kitchener PPS requires that Planning authorities shall not permit development and site alteration on adjacent lands to protected heritage property except where the proposed development and site alteration has been evaluated and it has been demonstrated that the heritage attributes of the protected heritage property will be conserved.' Figure 2 45 Mill Street, Part IV designation - Google Maps, April 2014 A Design Brief Apartments + Amenity + Community, Preliminary Design, 19-41 Mill Street, Kitchener was prepared by ABA Architects Inc. This brief (illustrations of which are included in this report) describes the proposed design and site plan, outlines the scope of the proposed project, provides site, building and parking data and a shadow study, and illustrates adjacent land uses and developments. The proposal is to re -designate and re -zone the lands (currently 5 lots) from Low Density Commercial Residential designation and CR -1 zoning to Residential 8 (R-8) zoning with site specific -provisions (FSR, parking, height, front yard setback to tower floors 5-10). The application is to demolish the existing residential dwellings and construct an 8 and 10 -storey multiple residential dwelling with townhouses fronting onto Mill Street and the Iron Horse Trail with the units totalling 176. A scoped site specific Heritage Impact Assessment terms of reference has been provided by the City (Appendix 1). The Heritage Impact Assessment must consider the proposed development in relation to all applicable Provincial, Regional and Municipal policies, guidelines and principles.' This includes the current Zoning By-law. The proposal has been designed under the provisions of the amendments noted above. 2 Provincial Policy Statement 2014, Part V: Policies 2.0 Wise use and management of resources, 2.6 Cultural heritage and archaeology, para. 2.6.3 ' City of Kitchener Development and Technical Services Department Heritage Impact Assessment— Terms of Reference CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised October 10, 2019 2-6 Scoped Heritage Impact Assessment 3 19 - 41 Mill Street, Kitchener 2.0 HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT REQUIREMENTS 2.1 Present owner contact information 2.2 Site history (omitted) 2.3 Description of natural heritage elements, landscaping and surrounding context (omitted) 2.4 Documentation of the heritage resource (omitted) 2.5 Outline of proposed development and its context and how it will impact the cultural heritage resources and neighbouring properties Context Figure 3 subject property location map - after: Region of Waterloo GIS locator CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised October 10, 2019 2-7 Scoped Heritage Impact Assessment 4 19 - 41 Mill Street, Kitchener Figure 3 illustrates the relationship of the VPAHCD and Joseph Schneider Haus, a National Historic site and a Regionally significant heritage resource, to the subject property (Figures 4 & 5). Single family homes of varying ages, styles, sizes and lot size, some divided into apartments, predominate on Mill Street and on adjacent Queen Street South (Figures 6 - 8). Across Queen Street South is a 14 -storey apartment building (Figure 8). The Iron Horse Trail (a former rail line) borders the rear of the subject property (Figures 10 & 11). Parkland associated with Schneider Creek is across Mill Street as is the parking lot for Schneider Haus (Figures 12 - 14). Fig 4 view towards subject property from Schneider Haus Figure 5 entrance to Schneider Ave at Queen St. S. Figure 6 Mill Street from Queen Street South Figure 7 houses opposite subject property on Mill St. kf 7F _ � r r � n Figure 8 houses adjacent subject property on Mill St. Fig 9 view of 14 -storey apartment from subject property CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised October 10, 2019 2-8 Scoped Heritage Impact Assessment 5 19 - 41 Mill Street, Kitchener Figure 10 Iron Horse Trail looking east Figure 11 Iron Horse Trail looking west Figure 12 park land opposite subject property Figure 13 park land opposite subject property Figure 14 Schneider Haus parking opposite subject property Figure 15 demolition adjacent Schneider Haus, May 9, 2018 Figure 16 subject property from Mill Street CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised October 10, 2019 2-9 Scoped Heritage Impact Assessment 8 19 - 41 Mill Street, Kitchener Development Proposal The subject lands are currently designated Low Density Commercial Residential inthe Mill Courtland Secondary Plan and are zoned Commercial Residential One Zone (CR -1). The City of Kitchener adopted the Planning Around Rapid Transit Stations (PARTS) Central Plan in April 2016, which includes the subject lands. The lands have been identified for `Medium Rise Residential', which permits an FSR of 0.6 to 2.0, and a maximum height of 8 -storeys. The proponent is applying for an amendment to the Mill Courtland Woodside Park Neighbourhood Plan for Land Use Secondary Plan to designate the lands as `High Rise Residential' to allow for an FSR between 1.0 and 4.0, without a maximum building height. This will be completed concurrently with a rezoning ofthe lands to Residential 8 (R-8) with site specific provisions to permit the proposed multiple residential dwelling, having an FSR of 3.5 and a tower height of 34.7 metres and street townhouses with a height of approximately 13.5 metres. The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing six residential dwellings and change the designation and zoning. Figure 19 excerpt from Schedule 86 -Zoning Map, City of Kitchener Figure 19 shows the current zoning of the subject property (in red) and adjacent properties. The Queen Street South Mixed Use Corridor (MUC) abuts part of the subject property. Urban design guidelines for this area of the Corridor are illustrated on Figure 20. 46 on Figure 20 is the 14 storey apartment on Queen Street South. The properties adjacent, zoned MU -1, are expected to be redeveloped in time with up to four storeys according to the current Zoning By-law. It is noted that all properties within the City's limits are regulated by the City's Zoning By-law, which may permit more development than presently exists on a property; however, other controls may limit what type of development might ultimately be permitted. In this case, the properties on Queen Street South are also regulated by the policies and guidelines of the VPAHCD Plan. A Heritage Permit CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised October 10, 2019 2-12 VRA SAM VIA rA hN MEN Figure 19 excerpt from Schedule 86 -Zoning Map, City of Kitchener Figure 19 shows the current zoning of the subject property (in red) and adjacent properties. The Queen Street South Mixed Use Corridor (MUC) abuts part of the subject property. Urban design guidelines for this area of the Corridor are illustrated on Figure 20. 46 on Figure 20 is the 14 storey apartment on Queen Street South. The properties adjacent, zoned MU -1, are expected to be redeveloped in time with up to four storeys according to the current Zoning By-law. It is noted that all properties within the City's limits are regulated by the City's Zoning By-law, which may permit more development than presently exists on a property; however, other controls may limit what type of development might ultimately be permitted. In this case, the properties on Queen Street South are also regulated by the policies and guidelines of the VPAHCD Plan. A Heritage Permit CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised October 10, 2019 2-12 Scoped Heritage Impact Assessment 9 19 - 41 Mill Street, Kitchener Application under the Ontario Heritage Act would be required to develop these lands AIF 'rrh, S fVl ' i tr BENTON GREW ClJ RE J r Li � 41 F/ a 4D4C1 Ali{ Q� 19-41 Mill Street % O _ HORS. MIKE 0 1 c rRA1 WAGNER rj fI f ti _ I CaRfEiV �F' ��y rlij rr L�I � U'rcu C +3 + KNITTING @A lu MI LL OA EEN `V w� �l f ' 1 t 43 U etl r i+ COURTS S �y Ts PARK �+�i ✓, G Figure 20 excerpt from Urban Design Guidelines, Queen Street South Mixed Use Corridor, City of Kitchener CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised October 10, 2019 2-13 Design Plata Le®eltd Kay Symbols Linkages nem ii e MUC eam.arj Proposed Streetscape Pedestrian � � — r — i J Improvement Potential Heritage Gateuvay Natural Streetscape Trag < � w — —? Resource Sultaing Edge Listed on the Municipal Pe,desnan Crossing Vehicular �. } Heritage Register � Street Tree Hentage Ktchener Inventory Transrt Int ravement p Lighting of Historic Buildings - Prvoosed Rapier ti't_°, Bus $tPR ® Pedesnan Designated under Part Noi Tranv Station `a" Terminus Site 7 Scale the KeritageAct PlannedfFuutre Parking P Enhancement 0 Designated under Part V of - Jetielaame�: .Area the Han tageAct Figure 20 excerpt from Urban Design Guidelines, Queen Street South Mixed Use Corridor, City of Kitchener CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised October 10, 2019 2-13 w M, w 2-14 C,J N M ;C C'j I 0 N 0 N w M �"r N U a x w � 2-16 2-17 FE! il FT� - L '- 2-18 n 2-19 2-20 2-21 LO 2-22 I rL , Y a Y � NUNN r A OWN NINE 11111111 -m■■ ---- MINE �il■■1■■1■■1■■I■1{■■ i,��ii•i,�ii NINE i = ■ ■ ■ i■! Mille, ' Ili � r� I I I ■„ ■� ON ME ko ■ - r— _i ■a JIG EEMS �� ■` ism r-El En 105 R* 1111 112 113 _ALA LjLj_ - ■>* �I. ■I II II r I � ��[I I■il■i�l■!1■il■!I■i���®�� IIS w w d 2-23 O N P -;KS IIM [x-61 olar-r+u N sms�ocoxu3roro� ose: M nn3�raa xaaV SNOILVA31� ■ ............................................. � d Y T d tL P Edw add d va di ^ "1 w d me WEC *me WCC MR WR OOOC M. OWC WG WEC WK WCC me WR OlZ[ ORC MR OWd VTC W:C me1, i � I I Y - r f - r u i I F Lm -, g 1 4, Id -- —F —71 -71 f FI t u. -Li ._LI Li Ll ll..ElE l C o ® o 0 r E t i F I f t. f� F z z O � 2-24 Scoped Heritage Impact Assessment 21 19 - 41 Mill Street, Kitchener The townhouses that face Mill Street and the Iron Horse Trail are faced with brick to complement the predominant building material of the neighbourhood. An alternative that does not use brick is illustrated in Figures 26 - 29. The apartment towers that are set well back from the street and the 2 -storey lobby/entrance are faced in precast concrete panels. The scoped site specific Heritage Impact Assessment terms of reference require the following to be provided for the redevelopment of the site.4 The proposed building including: 0 its location adjacent the Victoria Park Heritage Conservation District; its height in relation to the adjacent VPAHCD properties which are zoned to permita maximum height of] 3.5 metres; its design (scale, setbacks, stepbacks, architectural style and detail, building materials, colours) in relation to the VPAHCD; and its impact on the VPAHCD • Figures 2, 3, 17 and 20 show the subject property in relation to the VPAHCD, located to the south of the District with two flanking properties separating it from the Mill Street (front) side. At the rear of the subject property the rear yards of three properties in the District abut the walls of the proposed parking garage. • The adjacent VPAHCD properties are three former residential properties that front on Queen Street. These properties are currently zoned to permit a height of 13.5 metres (4 -storeys). Lands immediately to the west of the subject property and adjacent to the VPAHCD, are zoned "Medium Intensity Mixed Use Corridor (MU -2)", permitting a maximum building height of 24 metres (8 storeys). Across Queen Street, in full view of the subject property and within the VPAHCD, is a 14 storey apartment building (Iron Horse Towers), zoned "High Intensity Mixed Use Corridor (MU -3)" and adjacent is an 11 -storey apartment project at 588-600 Queen Street South (Figures 32 & 33). Figure 32 apartments in the neighbourhood - after: aba architects inc. City ofKitchener Development Services Department - Planning Division Scoped Site Specific Heritage Impact Assessment Terms of Reference, 19-41 Mill Street - Request for Revised HIA Terms of Reference - March 13, 2018 CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised October 10, 2019 2-25 Scoped Heritage Impact Assessment 22 19 - 41 Mill Street, Kitchener Figure 33 VPAHCD properties on Queen Street South and Iron Horse Tower opposite - Google Street View • The addition of an 8 -10 -storey building with a 3 -storey footprint approximating 6 former residential lots is different from the scale of the existing immediate neighbourhood; although there are other large scale buildings within sight. The scale and massing are mitigated by stepping back the towers from Mill Street and the south side of the project and flanking it with townhomes on the street and on the trail. The townhouses bring life, eyes and activity to the street and trail (Figures 22 - 25). The architectural style, materials and colours complement the streetscape. • The proposed apartment building is expected to have minimal impact on the VPAHCD. It is somewhat peripheral to the District, and although visible from it, there is no view from the District that makes it a dominant element. The properties in the District that are adj acent are zoned for 4 -storey buildings. When redeveloped, they will form a southerly entrance to the District that is of a greater mass and density than the current situation. The subject proposal reinforces that scenario. No alterations that are not sympathetic or compatible with the cultural heritage resource (the District) are proposed. No demolition of all or part of a significant or potentially significant cultural heritage resource is proposed. The potential impact of the development on the setting and character of the subject property is one of substantially greater mass and height. 0 its visibility from Queen Street South within the Victoria Park Heritage Conservation District • Figures 34 and 35 show the existing view from Queen Street and the proposed view respectively. The artist's rendering (Figure 35) does not include the mature Norway Spruce tree that is on the adjacent property on the west side of Mill Street that will screen much of the proposed apartment tower. The rendering is also shown as a wide -angled view, unlike the existing view (Figure 34) which is what the human eye sees. • The proposal has a street presence with similar setbacks to its neighbours and the townhouse facades create a rhythm reminiscent of the single family homes they replace. CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised October 10, 2019 2-26 Scoped Heritage Impact Assessment 23 19 - 41 Mill Street, Kitchener M... ; Figure 34 existing view - Mill Street from Queen Street South and Mill Street Figure 35 proposed view from Queen Street - aba architects inc. CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised October 10, 2019 2-27 Scoped Heritage Impact Assessment 24 19 - 41 Mill Street, Kitchener Figure 36 45 Mill Street - distance from designated parts to property line - Google Street View 0 its location adjacent 45 Mill Street; its height in relation to the adjacent 45 Mill Street property; its design (scale, setbacks, stepbacks, architectural style and detail, building materials, colours) in relation to 45 Mill Street; and its impact on 45 Mill Street Part of 45 Mill Street (Lot Number 339 of subdivision Plan of Lot Number 17 of the German Company Tract) is designated as being ofhistoric and architectural value under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act, that part being the north, east and west elevations as well as the hip and gable rooflines (By -Law Number 91-136) (Figure 36). The proposed building adjacent will be 3.0 metres from the mutual property line and approximately 7.5 metres from the designated east wall and roofline (Figure 37). The tower portion is set to the west end of the site, well away from the designated property. A shadow impact analysis prepared by aba architects me. (Appendix 3) indicates that 45 Mill Street and its garden will not be in shadow from the proposed building until evening throughout the year. It is anticipated that there will be no adverse impact on the adjacent garden. 0 r - ,1-4500 — i 45 MIL 5T EET fa designated 2-stored walls 1. 1 rM1n� 'R 13.Y 15 3 Figure 37 45 Mill Street & subject property CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised October 10, 2019 2-28 Scoped Heritage Impact Assessment 26 19 - 41 Mill Street, Kitchener Figure 38 shows the current view from near 57 Mill Street looking towards the VPAHCD. Figure 39 is an illustration of the proposal from a similar vantage point. The mature trees screen a fair amount of the building from this vantage. The artist's rendering in Figure 23 is the same view without the existing trees. To the north on Queen Street South (Figure 3), is Joseph Schneider Haus, a National Historic site and a Regionally significant heritage resource. There is no potential for negative impact on Schneider Haus from the proposal. The view from Schneider Haus (Figure 40) to the subject property is across Queen Street South and through the museum parking lot, and across and down Mill Street. Figure 40 view from Schneider Haus towards subject property o An angular plane study shows the relationship of the proposed building mass to the neighbouring properties and the street (Figure 41). The angular plane for the proposed building is 45 degrees measured from the curb, 54 degrees from the centreline of the sidewalk on Mill Street, and 58 degrees from the centreline of the Iron Horse Trail to the top of the building (Figure 41). There are no design guidelines for the angular plane analysis within the Urban Design Manual. Previous Guidelines recommended a 60 degree maximum. The City of Kitchener adopted the Design for Tall Buildings' in December 2017 that speaks to the design of tall buildings within the City, of which the architect has evaluated and incorporated into their design. The current urban design heritage guidelines for tall buildings are: ' City of Kitchener Urban Design Manual Part B Design for Tall Buildings, December 11, 2017, p. 16 of 18 CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised October 10, 2019 2-30 Scoped Heritage Impact Assessment 27 19 - 41 Mill Street, Kitchener Locate and design tall buildings to respect and complement the scale, character, form and siting of on-site and surrounding cultural heritage resources. • The `surrounding' cultural heritage resource is the designated property at 45 Mill Street and the nearby VPAHCD. This has been addressed on the previous pages. There is no on-site cultural heritage resource. 0 When a tall building is adjacent to a built heritage resource: Design the Base to respect the scale, setbacks, stepbacks, proportions, visual relationship, topography, and materials specific to built heritage resources. • The base has been designed to be approximately the same height as the adjacent designated building and with a similar setback. Materials ofthe townhouses are compatible, with clean, simple, modern materials employed on the towers. In addition, the townhouses on Mill Street have a sawtooth pattern that reflects the angular orientation ofthe older houses on the street and provides a rhythmic pattern to the streetscape. 0 Integrate the existing heritage character into the Base through high-quality, contemporary design cues. • See previous and following descriptions. 0 Provide additional tall building setbacks, stepbacks and other appropriate Placement or design measures to respect the heritage setting and to protect or enhance view corridors • A substantial stepback to the tower has been designed so that the view from the street is mainly ofthe 3 - storey townhouses. View corridors on Mill Street are illustrated in Figures 22 - 25 Figure 41 angular plane study - after aba architects inc. The proposal includes a substantial landscape component in the order of 29% of the site (Figure 21). CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised October 10, 2019 2-31 a� R� Ga€G� m f� a e o e z � � A ics s r,r 7 M M [c2 gg R Moo Figure 41 angular plane study - after aba architects inc. The proposal includes a substantial landscape component in the order of 29% of the site (Figure 21). CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised October 10, 2019 2-31 Scoped Heritage Impact Assessment 28 19 - 41 Mill Street, Kitchener 2.6 Conservation - options and mitigation The cultural heritage resources are the adjacent Victoria Park Heritage Conservation District and the designated property at 45 Mill Street. Conservation options employed to avoid or mitigate a negative impact on the cultural heritage resources include: o preservation in-situ ofthe cultural heritage resource - neitherthe District, northe designated property are physically affected; o isolating development and site alteration from significant built heritage resources and significant cultural heritage landscapes - the development does not contain a significant built heritage resource and, although it is on the periphery of the Cedar Hill cultural heritage landscape, the description of that CHL notes that Indeed, this visual variety is strong enough to permit the presence of massive mid twentieth century apartment blocks without undue visual deterioration 6; • utilizing design guidelines that harmonize mass, setback, setting, and materials - materials are brick for the townhouses and precast for the apartments - stepbacks from Mill Street reduce the sense of height, especially from the street and from the longer view from Queen Street - an angular plane of less than 60 degrees is employed - a sawtooth pattern orienting the townhouses in the same manner as existing older homes is provided; • allowing only compatible infill and additions -the infill is compatible with the area which is in transition from 2 - 2'/2 single family homes to 4 - 14 storey buildings. While the subject property is not within the VPAHCD, it is adjacent and visible from the District. Some guidance to conservation is provided in the Victoria Park Area Heritage Conservation District Plan', i.e.: NEW B UILDING INTRODUCTION In the Queen Street South corridor, zoning permits and encourages new high rise, high density development. Major new building may be expected. This plan recognizes and supports the rights and privileges ofproperty owners to redevelop in compliance with the Municipal Plan. This is not necessarily considered contrary to heritage conservation. POLICIES Public Realm New building shall contribute to the public realm of Queen Street South, which is perceived as an historic, gracious and tree -lined thoroughfare. The development is not on Queen Street South or in the Queen Street Corridor. However, it is visible from Queen Street and can contribute to the public realm of Queen Street South, especially as a southern gateway to the District and the Corridor. Pedestrian New building shall emphasize a human scale that creates a comfortable, safe and Scale livable streetscape. Ground floor uses which can animate and enliven the public street are encouraged. The visual mass of the building is lowered by fronting both the Mill Street and Iron Horse Trail public 6 The Landplan Collaborative Ltd., City of Kitchener, Cultural Heritage, Data Sheets, December 2014 ' Victoria ParkArea Heritage Conservation District Plan, City of Kitchener, Nicholas Hill, Architect -Planner, May 1996, pp. 67-68 CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised October 10, 2019 2-32 Scoped Heritage Impact Assessment 29 19 - 41 Mill Street, Kitchener realms with town houses in scale and alignment with the current buildings on the street. Entrance doors front on the street and the Trail to animate the public realm. Design Contemporary design of a high quality shall be achieved that is complementary to the historic character of the Area in terms of massing, materials and scale. The contemporary design features a combination of brick and precast concrete; floors are delineated in the wall finish, lessening the visual mass of the building. Location New building shall be located to create streetscape continuity and pedestrian scale. See Public Realm' and `Pedestrian Scale' above. Density Every effort shall be made to blend new high rise building with neighbouring low rise residences. This could include varied building heights and elevations and the breaking up of the building mass. The visual mass of the building is reduced by fronting the public realms with town houses, stepping back the tower floors, and undulating the street facade. Height Design treatments to lessen the perception of height in new high rise development shall be considered, such as facade setbacks, mansard roofs, gables and varying building finishes and textures. Setbacks and varied, compatible building finishes and textures are to be employed. Materials Materials typical of the historic Area, such as brick, shall be used. Brick, common in the historic Area and the immediate environs, is proposed as the dominant material on the town house facades. The alternative (see Figures 26 - 29) does not comply with this guideline. Roofs Roofs shall be designed to create an attractive skyline and screen roof equipment. Rooftop equipment is not visible from the ground. Windows The appearance, placement and proportion of windows shall be complementary to historic windows in the Area, if possible. Windows on the townhouses are taller than wide and with divided lites, reflective of the neighbouring homes. Verandahs Verandahs shall be incorporated, wherever possible, to continue an historic tradition in the Area. Not applicable. Colours Colours ofpaint and materials shall be complementary to the historic character of the Area. See `Materials' above. Landscaping Landscaping should enhance new building and the Queen Street South streetscape. CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised October 10, 2019 2-33 Scoped Heritage Impact Assessment 30 19 - 41 Mill Street, Kitchener Landscaping should create continuity in the streetscape between adjacent properties, where possible. Plant material, where appropriate, should be used to soften building size, mass and edges to maintain a human scale for pedestrians. Landscaping should screen and buffer service areas, parking, open storage and other unsightly areas where required. Landscaping should buffer high density buildings from low density where required. The building is not on Queen Street South, nevertheless, its landscape contributes to the Mill Street streetscape and can be seen from Queen Street South. Deciduous shade trees reinforce the existing trees in the park across the street and on neighbouring properties. Private, landscaped space, as well as screen planting and fencing is provided. Service areas and waste containers are internal. Parking is situated underground, accessed from Mill Street. (Figure 21) Regarding an evaluation the potential impact of construction (e.g. impacts from vibration), it is recommended that this be addressed through the completion of a pre -construction survey of 45 Mill Street as a condition of the site plan application. 2.7 Summary of conservation principles and how they will be used The terms of reference for this HIA require: .... A summary of the conservation principles and how they will be used.... The conservation principles may be found in publications such as: Parks Canada Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada; Eight Guiding Principles in the Conservation of Building Heritage Properties, OntarioMinistry ofCulture; and, the OntarioMinistry of Culture's Ontario Heritage Tool Kit (all available online). Parks Canada's Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada provides "Guidelines for Cultural Landscapes, Including Heritage Districts"'. Guidelines are divided into 11 subsections: evidence of land use; evidence oftraditional practices; land patterns; spatial organization; visual relationships; circulation; ecological features; vegetation; landforms; water features; and built features. The subject property is not in a Heritage Conservation District. It is; however, in an identified CHL. Regarding the subsection evidence of land use, the guidelines relate exclusively to understanding and protecting features in a particular land use and changes to a land use. As there are no proposed changes to the land use and no anticipated negative impact to heritage resources, this guideline appears to be satisfied. The evidence of traditional practices subsection does not apply to this situation. Land pattern refers to the overall arrangement and interrelationship of the larger -scale aspects of a cultural landscape, whether natural or human -made. In this case, the recommendation for additions or alterations to a CHL are "Designing a new feature when required by a new use that does not obscure, damage or destroy s Parks Canada. Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (second edition) Chapter 4, Guidelines for Cultural Landscapes, Including Heritage Districts, 2010 CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised October 10, 2019 2-34 Scoped Heritage Impact Assessment 31 19 - 41 Mill Street, Kitchener character -defining land patterns". Not recommended is "Introducing a new feature that is incompatible in size, scale or design with the land pattern"9. The new feature proposed does not obscure, damage or destroy character -defining land patterns as evidenced by the description of the Cedar Hill CHL (see page 28 of this report). With respect to the spatial organization subsection, the recommendation is to design new features that are compatible with the character -defining spatial organization. The sawtooth pattern and similar setbacks proposed provide that measure of compatibility. "The visual relationships between elements of natural or designed landscapes, or heritage districts, can influence the user experience. For example, a tall building in a low-rise heritage district may be perceived as out of scale."10 The proposal is to insert a multi-storey building in the Mill Street streetscape that replaces a number of smaller -scale residences. Art first glance, this might appear to be "out of scale". However, mitigating measures have been proposed, such as constructing townhomes of similar scale along the street in a pattern replicating the existing homes to the south along the street. Also, there are numerous tall buildings within sight and within the CHL and the adjacent HCD that, according to the Cedar Hill CHL description, do not provide undue visual deterioration. There is no anticipated alteration to the circulation, ecological features, vegetation, landforms and water features subsections; this, these do not apply. With respect to the built features subsection, the applicable recommendation is to design a new built feature to be compatible with the heritage value of the cultural landscape, using traditional form and materials compatible with the cultural landscape. Again, mitigating measures such as the form of the townhomes and building materials used are designed to provide that compatibility. 2.8 Proposed alterations justified and explained (omitted) 2.9 Recommendations The terms of reference require that ... Recommendations ... be as specific as possible, describing and illustrating locations, elevations, materials, landscaping, etc. The new building, its location on the site, fenestration, materials, colours and textures and its landscape shall conform to the applicable conservation principles set out in the Victoria Park Area Heritage Conservation District Plan, the Queen Street South Mixed Use Corridor Urban Design Guidelines, and the Design for Tall Buildings guidelines as elaborated upon in paragraph 2.6 above and as illustrated in this HIA. In addition, it is recommended that when design elements and materials are being chosen, red or buff brick, a material that is common to the neighbourhood, be strategically used on the town house facades to reinforce the streetscape character and reduce the appearance of mass ofthe building, and that design cues taken from the adjacent 19' 9 Ibid, p. 61 10 Ibid, p. 67 CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised October 10, 2019 2-35 Scoped Heritage Impact Assessment 32 19 - 41 Mill Street, Kitchener century homes be introduced on the town house facades. An alternative that appears as a more modern approach (see Figures 26 - 29) does not, in the opinion of this author, provide the sane reinforcement of character. 2.10 Qualifications of the author completing the Heritage Impact Assessment See appendix 4. 3.0 SUMMARY STATEMENT and CONSERVATION RECOMMENDATIONS Regarding "impactthe proposed developmentwill have onthe heritage attributes ofthe adjacent Victoria Park Heritage Conservation District", although a building of greater height than those which it replaces is proposed, no negative impacts on the heritage attributes of the District are expected if the mitigating measures recommended are implemented. As far as "what conservation or mitigative measures, or alternative development, or site alteration approaches are recommended", if the conservation principles espoused in paragraphs 2.6 and 2.9 above are adhered to, no other mitigating measures, alternative developments, or site alterations are recommended. The concept that utilizes different building materials from the brick and precast facades was considered and is not recommended by this author. Respecting "clarification as to why specific conservation or mitigative measures, or alternative development or site alteration approaches are not appropriate", the proposal generally meets the proposed zoning by-law. It conforms to the Victoria Park -Area Heritage Conservation District Plan new building principles; the Mixed Use Corridor Official Plan Policies, the Mixed Use Corridor Design Brief "Strategies" and "Guidelines" for the Queen Street South Corridor, and the Design for Tall Buildings guidelines. Mitigating measures have been recommended and alternative development or site alteration approaches are not deemed necessary as the proposal has no negative impact on the Heritage Conservation District or 45 Mill Street. 4.0 MANDATORY RECOMMENDATION (omitted) This scoped heritage impact assessment is respectfully submitted by: CHC Limited per: Owen R. Scott, OALA, FCSLA, CAHP CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised October 10, 2019 2-36 Scoped Heritage Impact Assessment 33 19 - 41 Mill Street, Kitchener REFERENCES ABA Architects Inc. Design BriefApartments + Amenity + Community, Preliminary Design, 19-41 Mill Street, Kitchener Hill, Nicholas, Architect -Planner, Victoria Park Area Heritage Conservation District Plan, City of Kitchener, May 1996. City of Kitchener Index of Properties Designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. City of Kitchener Index of Properties Designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act. City of Kitchener Index ofNon-designated Properties ofHeritage Value or Interest. City of Kitchener Development Services Department - Planning Division Scoped Site Specific Heritage Impact Assessment Terms of Reference, 19-41 Mill Street -Requestfor RevisedHIA Terms ofReference - March 13, 2018. City of Kitchener Official Plan, Part 3, 13.4 Mill Courtland -Woodside Park Secondary Plan, January 23, 2015 pp. 13-19 - 13-28. City of Kitchener Urban Design Manual, PART A City -Wide Design. City of Kitchener Urban Design Manual Part B Design for Tall Buildings, December 11, 2017. City of Kitchener Urban Design Manual — Part B: Design Briefs, Mixed -Use Corridors, 2012. City of Kitchener Section 55 (By-law 2008-154, S. 3) High Intensity Mixed Use Corridor Zone (MU -3) City of Kitchener, BY-LAWNUMBER91-136 designating part of 45Mill Street in the City of Kitchener as being of historical and architectural value. Ontario Heritage Act R.S O. 1990, c. 0.18. Provincial Policy Statement (PPS, 2014) Parks Canada, Standard & Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada, second edition www.pc.2010. CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised October 10, 2019 2-37 Appendix 1 1 HIA Terms of Reference City of Kitchener Development Services Department - Planning Division Scoped Site Specific Heritage Impact Assessment Terms of Reference 19-41 Mill Street Request for revised HIA Terms of Reference — March 13, 2018 1.0 Background Introduction The following Terms of Reference shall be used to fulfill the condition regarding completion and approval of a Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) prior to the consideration of an application made under the Planning Act. A Heritage Impact Assessment is a study to determine the impacts to known and potential cultural heritage resources within a defined area proposed for future development. The study shall include an inventory of all cultural heritage resources within the planning application area. The study results in a report which identifies all known cultural heritage resources, an evaluation of the significance of the resources, and makes recommendations toward mitigative measures thatwould minimize negative impacts to those resources. A Heritage Impact Assessment may be required on a property which is listed on the City's Heritage Kitchener Committee Inventory; listed on the City's Municipal Heritage Register; designated under the Ontario Heritage Act, or where development is proposed adjacent to a protected heritage property. The requirement may also apply to unknown or recorded cultural heritage resources which are discovered during the development application stage or construction. Subject Property The subject property municipally addressed is located on the south side of Mill Street directly east of the intersection at Mill Street and Queen Street South in the Mill Courtland Planning Community in the City of Kitchener. The property is zoned Commercial Residential One Zone in the Zoning By-law and designated Low Density Commercial Residential within the Official Plan. The property is located adjacent to protected heritage property, including a Heritage Conservation District (HCD) and an individually designated property. The Victoria Park Area HCD is designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act. A copy of the Victoria Park Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District is available online. Excerpts from the Victoria Park Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District Study are attached. The property municipally addressed as 45 Mill Street is designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. A copy of the designating by-law is attached. Proposed Development These Terms of Reference are prepared based on a preliminary design document provided by email on March 15, 2018, which describes the development proposal as follows: CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised Octo1 10, 2 j i, Appendix 1 2 HIA Terms of Reference • To construct a 16 storey building with 157 units. Policy Context Section 2 of the Planning Act indicates that Council shall have regard to matters of Provincial interest such as the conservation of features of significant architectural, cultural, historical, archaeological or scientific interest. In addition, Section 3 of the Planning Act requires that decisions of Council shall be consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement. Policy 2.6.1 of the Provincial Policy Statement requires that significant built heritage resources and significant cultural heritage landscapes shall be conserved. Policy 2.6.3 of the PPS indicates that "planning authorities shall not permit development and site alteration on adjacent lands to protected heritage property except where the proposed development and site alteration has been evaluated and it has been demonstrated that the heritage attributes of the protected heritage property will be conserved." The Provincial Policy Statement defines significant as "resources that have been determined to have cultural heritage value or interest for the important contribution they make to our understanding of the history of a place, an event, or a people. " Conserved is defined as "the identification, protection, management and use of built heritage resources, cultural heritage landscapes and archaeological resources in a mannerthat ensures theircultural heritage value or interest is retained under the Ontario Heritage Act. This may be achieved by the implementation of recommendations set out in a conservation plan, archaeological assessment, and/or heritage impact assessment. Mitigative measures and/or alternative development approaches can be included in these plans and assessments. " Policy 3.G.1 of the Regional Official Plan (adopted June 16, 2009 by Regional Council) indicates that the Region and area municipalities will ensure that cultural heritage resources are conserved using the provisions of the Heritage Act, the Planning Act, the Environmental Assessment Act, the Cemeteries Act and the Municipal Act. The City's 1994 and 2014 Official Plan contains policies that require development to conserve cultural heritage resources. The relevant 2014 Official Plan policies are not under appeal. These policies also establish the requirement for the submission of studies as part of complete applications. These policies also require mitigative measures and recommendations of approved HIAs to be implemented through conditions of planning applications. 2.0 Heritage Impact Assessment Requirements The following minimum requirements will be required in a Heritage Impact Assessment: 2.1 Present owner contact information for property proposed for development and/or site alteration. 2.2 Omitted. 2.3 Omitted. 2.4 Omitted. CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised Octo1 10, 21 Appendix 1 3 HIA Terms of Reference 2.5 An outline of the proposed development, its context, and how it will impact the cultural heritage resources and neighbouring properties shall be required. The Heritage Impact Assessment must consider potential negative impacts as identified in the Ministry of Culture's Ontario Heritage Tool Kit. Negative impacts may include but are not limited to: alterations that are not sympathetic or compatible with the cultural heritage resource; shadows created that alter the appearance of heritage attributes of the cultural heritage resource; direct or indirect obstruction of significant views or vistas; demolition of all or part of a cultural heritage resource; physical impacts from construction, etc. The outline should also address the influence and potential impact of the development on the setting and character of the subject property, the adjacent VPAHCD and 45 Mill Street. Specific consideration shall be given to the following. • The proposed 16 storey building including: 0 its impact on the VPAHCD and 45 Mill Street; 0 its location in relation to the VPAHCD and 45 Mill Street; 0 its height in relation to the adjacent VPAHCD properties which are zoned to permit a maximum height of 13.5 metres; 0 its design (scale, setbacks, stepbacks, architectural style and detail, building materials, colours) in relation to the VPAHCD and 45 Mill Street; 0 its visibility from Queen Street South within the VPAHCD; and, 0 its setback/visibility from Mill Street (near 57 Mill Street) looking towards Queen Street. An angular plane, sight line and massing model is required. 2.6 Options shall be provided that explain how the cultural heritage resources may be conserved, relating to their level of importance. Methods of conservation through avoiding or mitigating a negative impact on a cultural heritage resource may include, but are not limited to: preservation in-situ of a cultural heritage resource; alternative development approaches; isolating development and site alteration from significant built heritage resources and significant cultural heritage landscapes; design guidelines that harmonize mass, setback, setting, and materials; limiting height and density; allowing only compatible infill and additions; reversible alterations; etc. Each mitigative measure should create a sympathetic context for the cultural heritage resource. 2.7 A summary of the conservation principles and how they will be used must be included. The conservation principles may be found in publications such as: Parks Canada — Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada; Eight Guiding Principles in the Conservation of Building Heritage Properties, Ontario Ministry of Culture; and, the Ontario Ministry of Culture's Ontario Heritage Tool Kit (all available online). 2.8 Omitted. 2.9 Recommendations shall be as specific as possible, describing and illustrating locations, elevations, materials, landscaping, etc. CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised Octo1 10, 204 0 Appendix 1 4 HIA Terms of Reference 2.10 The qualifications and background of the person(s) completing the Heritage Impact Assessment shall be included in the report. The author(s) must demonstrate a level of professional understanding and competence in the heritage conservation field of study. The report will also include a reference for any literature cited, and a list of people contacted during the study and referenced in the report. 3.0 Summary Statement and Conservation Recommendations The summary statement should provide a full description of: • Omitted. The identification of any impact the proposed development will have on the heritage attributes of the adjacent VPAHCD and 45 Mill Street. • An explanation of what conservation or mitigative measures, or alternative development, or site alteration approaches are recommended. • Clarification as to why specific conservation or mitigative measures, or alternative development or site alteration approaches are not appropriate. 4.0 Omitted 5.0 Approval Process Three (3) hard copies of the Heritage Impact Assessment and one electronic pdf format burned on CD shall be provided to Heritage Planning staff. Both the hard and electronic copies shall be marked with a "DRAFT" watermark background. The Heritage Impact Assessment will be reviewed by City staff to determine whether all requirements have been met and to review the preferred option(s). Following the review of the Heritage Impact Assessment by City staff, three (3) hard copies and one electronic copy of the final Heritage Impact Assessment ("DRAFT" watermark removed) will be required. The copies of the final Heritage Impact Assessment will be considered by the Director of Planning. Note that Heritage Impact Assessments maybe circulated to the City's Heritage Kitchener Committee for information and discussion. A Site Plan Review Committee meeting may not be scheduled until the City's Heritage Kitchener Committee has been provided an opportunity to review and provide feedback to City staff. Heritage Impact Assessments may be subject to a peer review to be conducted by a qualified heritage consultant at the expense of the City of Kitchener. The applicant will be notified of Staff's comments and acceptance, or rejection of the report. An accepted Heritage Impact Assessment will become part of the further processing of a development application under the direction of the Planning Division. The recommendations within the final approved version of the Heritage Impact Assessment may be incorporated into development related legal agreements between the City and the proponent at the discretion of the municipality. CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised Octo10, 20 Appendix 2 Designation By-law No 91-136 MLF'" Document General M: r.'11: 1 LME 9 ^� pNaot F- 4 — Lzrd II rpYlrtllm ns 1- A:1 7549 Trip Y M L& -a Um L 1 T It) P" 1 M 5 -1'-- Lr P K*.K 14-,f— c.. drrrr.at All mRJ tdcWJler thsC k. .e n 4E iniad -d pa'erdMI& SEtuate. l." end be' nqj in thr City of VLtdYt WY, JIR Glee 1 %16141 KMicipality of WaLerloo, fonwrly in the Ccxa-.ty of Lbterlco, and in the Pvcirkcr nE 4ntariop lair¢sed of Lot bw 134 of s�livisia, PLrin of loot �r 1.7 of aw Carwri C mparV Tract:- - rl_—I Mrift IR. r ,i:j— 11.1Sd�c O. +4i I,- bon —I F9rx lci++i�l kd�r�r C-N*rt Fynt.ira rh o l— By—tM ji,�M 4]._1.36 do fgnot rg parL at 45 mill SCreec in dw City of JC1L chwWr a& l qiT of histaeical and ardeiLetLat li %mbie. This Is 2xhibit 'a^ Eo• the affi nvik of GAIR_ '1UCUJUL SCISUOSKI mWern haft fora roe thlB day of April 34.n. Jq#l. ti =C IMM LIS 5101 K ¢rW 0-1rWk..lo r is ir'•5•.° - , Jradtiel al Pw4(mm)=�SdnAstilusw wrri :M. ifr. .31 ar � } "POW11 ES♦iry Gd(:)" 4 w o IC%,PORATIDN OF U T..i.. C11YCT =V2{R by i[s .... _ . _ . . ...... i SalLci[oY ,MPJ .. ' .t p {?3e.;5 9oriSnr96,r P -GL aac 1,118_ 22 FrCderi.ck SereetL kitc3we9ner. Wtar[LO = 4e;? 12$ P"mW r2r. (PA amu. or IroymM . Gila ui Su hYlu�F ................° ........ .. .. .. . . L o .. ..._. ..._. _. ..._. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .._.. .. .. _L ....i ..i. , wpiapr lai._ d 1rri ori )4+�+ Pr r� b I ° WqW —d ra J 45 Wil. `fireer- 1AHU WALLACErygarr alo^ r,_ K1ccherrer, U9y[r3a f9] Cc rdssi�� oL LeWal 5t*rai�e9 City SoLicicoc° g_{L, bae 1t1B 22 fkoderick 5[reet — Kitchftncrr, OnLario 4W Tom �-- 06wi. on CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised Octo1 10, 204 2 Appendix 2 Designation By-law No 91-136 R,Y-LAW m ur AkA d r a m N 1:1L, Rof J I PE G Or THE ANE 1 SU CORPMATION OF THE 1TTT OF T1T=VF7, (geingi l< by-l&V to de$iin;M9 part of the propeztyr wunir;ipmLl knorn as 4b 73111 Gtreet im the City of Ritchener as iming of hiRt-Pric and archituatura1 value 111HERUS Seetl= 29 of V36 Ontario HeritAeit 2L( x. R-9.*. 1�08u, Cbapter 337, author i ze:F "a Cawv= ii 1 of a Munic 1palsty to vHa-Ct by-14LWs tgo 434� i q nmtm :rang pz�p�ty r irmckuainq all rbulldiMa and 9tr=hirQ* thorpon, to b4 of ayc shiimcr`ural or Mist"_"_ ual" or interest; kd WHMkRKS the Council of The Corpor4t i an or tba City of xitcfte r Iva& ca sed t4D tv imrva# an the mmar mf the laftds arid. Jrr$aiie KnOrArn mmaPRiP ipa 14Y ar- AS Mill stnmat in the City or Kitc-bamer, arra uppn the 'tar io Horitage roum"tlilmh, a Notict fif Int-ention to Deaignat4D a.0 baing a{ Tj:mtmrze a pa architmatural wall ! khat part -of the aforesaid real prqRgzy mea parti—larl hereinafter dee�ribey, and had cau"d v4wh Ncvticr� of IptARtion to be publi&bedl In n ntuapap L bmvinq ganarAl vireulation in the municipality once! fc%Y Bch io�C thrdp* cpm—mcutivo vaeks; AND WHEREAS wm Notice of nbje.ation ito thm prcpasad dlaignatlon hae be4m ser P4 C1pan tl4ii Clark of tkm municipality: NOW THEREFOBE UM "Uracil vi The =Tporatign. UE the City of Kitchener enmrtats aQ mrallowpz 1. There is d,eeignated ea being of histaric and mrchi:tectsrrmlyailkia that part -of the aioreabld re$1 property knoom as 45 Mi11 Street beir4 bomp1:ieed of r -be north, mast tmd Volt: elmvmt iane as well all the hip and gahlt fi=f. ll elf. Z_ The pity saliditur fa bmrebay+ 2L thOrited tee ta.uee a Omoy Q: tbim Ey-lav to ba ragi®tercd atgaimsk ith,e 4rhule of th.4 prppqrty dimcr i bed in Hohtdu le ItA" hermto ; of which th4 as l a 0dp4 i .tm4 coria tr+rus a partj in the proper lwrd ragiatry orflam. CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised Octo1 10, 204 3 Appendix 2 Designation By-law No 91-136 MI CROF I MEC JUNE 14a-' .3. The clerk ias hereby a0°Lthor i zed tc cause a napy of brim ag-Levet tea bS &@rVej. OD tbQ oVff1,oX- a -C the dfnrCMaid prvpei-ty jkh! on 't,h er SRT 7 o Haritay4a EPaund.at i on and to q-_t,ute 15cptiOq of the "c*; ng at th:z By-law to ba publiabed in the saves nawNpapae having go -cr•s l ciroulat.i" in the Pgateunity onom for eaoLL of three OQnsecutive Weeks. Viaeim at the "il-rxi i.TI t�ia City of litche:ner "JAC ArAieLy 0f -n Ar A.U. 19'9'1. r 1� CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised Octo1 10, 2044 Appendix 2 Designation By-law No 91-136 SCHEDWA *'jL■ M I GE DF I LME D JUNE M4 Alrlr AND r.IN Gl_1IAR t -hat oo r# a i n piTC!Q j of lAnd Wkd Pr9Mi, 9QtG m itua-La, lying mnd balmg in, #bQ CitY cd KItcMXTSGP, in th4m R.c.giore l Municipality of Watt Lour 'osmmrlY in tn& jnt}' of Waterloo, aLnd th,R provi a Of OFLtaPiP, beIng 0810-2 PT T.nt ]RUMN-r 339 Of SW:di.v g�On Pl&n Of Lot l' 1? OE tn$ C2r um C4cwany TrVAFE- CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised Octo10, 20 133b1S IIIYV Ib -b LL'LO'"10Z sx04ibL'at+1:73t�� L'3mOL Ad HSM STN H IZ SISklvw lovdwl MOO NHS ■ —1� � t N r r 3 L N _ U f {J 97D 11 N 2-46 133diS11IW It -$I sIIT, S97�BIOL'�ON�'d ""L 3MQ1A tlQ1501 S''N (V 13 �1151DS IL 3Nf1f SIS�I'dN'v` l�'ddW l M®CPdHS ■ ............................................................................................................ 411 o l � n N d N N Q N N +I' 4. d t `�I c cu tn Ir ? \ a N 2-47 133?11J IIIYY ��`6� Ll'19'dIDZ _LMNu3rnwIZ 7 " A3L'O1S91 STN nI%QNIfIQ3l i139w3W35 � SISAIVW lOVdVVI MOCIVHS ■ ............................................................................................................ �- m Q L N N F.d L 1 t) I G7 LO 4 Q ui F jll KD W � W 2-48 III J.33 �.S � N H7'6 I sm�eiosaIIIe LI'1�'dlgE tldrt4k A3 h'61S DI S'1'N 13�LLS1�� IL 7139�3�30 -____'.............................................................................................. SISAIVNV la'ddNl MQOdHS ■ i r I I y Al CL cQi a N aL a W � U � O �I Y 1 O .n - � .. fu N 2-49 Appendix 4 Qualifications of the Author OWEN R SCOTT, OALA, FCSLA, CAHP Education: Master of Landscape Architecture (MLA) University of Michigan, 1967 Bachelor of Science in Agriculture (Landscape Horticulture), (BSA) University of Guelph, 1965 Professional Experience: 1965 - present President, CHC Limited, Guelph, ON 1977-2018 President, The Landplan Collaborative Ltd., Guelph, ON 1977-1985 Director, The Pacific Landplan Collaborative Ltd., Vancouver and Nanaimo, BC 1975-1981 Editor and Publisher, Landscape Architecture Canada, Ariss, ON 1969-1981 Associate Professor, School of Landscape Architecture, University of Guelph 1975-1979 Director and Founding Principal, Ecological Services for Planning Limited, Guelph, ON 1964-1969 Landscape Architect, Project Planning Associates Limited, Toronto, ON Historical Research, Heritage Planning and Conservation Experience and Expertise Current Professional and Professional Heritage Associations Affiliations: Member: Alliance for Historic Landscape Preservation (AHLP) - 1978 - Member: Canadian Association of Heritage Professionals (CARP) - 1987 - Member: Ontario Association of Landscape Architects (OALA) - 1968 - (Emeritus 2016) Member: Canadian Society of Landscape Architects (FCSLA) - 1969 - (Fellow 1977, Life Member 2016) Community and Professional Society Service (Heritage): Director: Canadian Association of Heritage Professionals (CARP), 2002 - 2003 Member: Advisory Board, Architectural Conservancy of Ontario, 1980 - 2002 Member: City of Guelph Local Architectural Conservation Advisory Committee (LACAC), 1987 - 2000 (Chair 1988 - 1990) Member: Advisory Council, Centre for Canadian Historical Horticultural Studies, 1985-1988 Professional Honours and Awards (Heritage): Merit Award 2016 Canadian Association of Heritage Professionals Awards, City of Kitchener Cultural Heritage Landscapes National Award 2016 Canadian Society of Landscape Architects (CSLA), City of Kitchener Cultural Heritage Landscapes Mike Wagner Award 2013 Heritage Award - Breithaupt Block, Kitchener, ON People's Choice Award 2012 Brampton Urban Design Awards, Peel Art Gallery, Museum and Archives, Brampton, ON Award of Excellence 2012 Brampton Urban Design Awards, Peel Art Gallery, Museum and Archives, Brampton, ON National Award 2009 Heritage Canada Foundation National Achievement, Alton Mill, Alton, ON Award of Merit 2009 Canadian Association of Heritage Professionals Awards, Alton Mill, Alton, ON Award 2007 Excellence in Urban Design Awards, Heritage, Old Quebec Street, City of Guelph, ON Award 2001 Ontario Heritage Foundation Certificate of Achievement Award 1998 Province of Ontario, Volunteer Award (10 year award) CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised October 10, 2019 2-50 Appendix 4 Award 1994 Province of Ontario, Volunteer Award (5 year award) Regional Merit 1990 CSLA Awards, Britannia School Farm Master Plan National Honour 1990 CSLA Awards, Confederation Boulevard, Ottawa Citation 1989 City of Mississauga Urban Design Awards, Britannia School Farm Master Plan Honour Award 1987 Canadian Architect, Langdon Hall Landscape Restoration, Cambridge, ON Citation 1986 Progressive Architecture, The Ceremonial Routes (Confederation Boulevard), Ottawa, National Citation 1985 CSLA Awards, Tipperary Creek Heritage Conservation Area Master Plan, Saskatoon, SK National Merit 1984 CSLA Awards, St. James Park Victorian Garden, Toronto, ON Award 1982 Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs Ontario Renews Awards, Millside, Guelph, ON Selected Heritage Publications: Scott, Owen R., The Southern Ontario "Grid", ACORN Vol XXVI-3, Summer 2001. The Journal of the Architectural Conservancy of Ontario. Scott, Owen R. 19th Century Gardens for the 20' and 21 'Centuries. Proceedings of "Conserving Ontario's Landscapes" conference of the ACO, (April 1997). Architectural Conservancy of Ontario Inc., Toronto, 1998. Scott, OwenR. Landscapes ofMemories, A Guidefor Conserving Historic Cemeteries. (19 of 30 chapters) compiled and edited by Tamara Anson-Cartright, Ontario Ministry of Citizenship, Culture and Recreation, 1997. Scott, Owen R. Cemeteries: A Historical Perspective, Newsletter, The Memorial Society of Guelph, September 1993. Scott, Owen R. The Sound of the Double -bladed Axe, Guelph and its Spring Festival. edited by Gloria Dent and Leonard Conolly, The Edward Johnson Music Foundation, Guelph, 1992. 2 pp. Scott,OwenR. Woolwich Street Corridor, Guelph, ACORNVo1XVI-2, Fall 1991. Newsletter of the Architectural Conservancy of Ontario Inc. (ACO) Scott, Owen R. guest editor, ACORN, Vol. XIV -2, Summer 1989. Cultural Landscape Issue, Newsletter of the ACO. Scott, OwenR. Heritage Conservation Education, Heritage Landscape Conservation, Momentum 1989, Icomos Canada, Ottawa, p.31. Scott, Owen R. Cultivars, pavers and the historic landscape, Historic Sites Supplies Handbook. Ontario Museum Association, Toronto, 1989. 9 pp. Scott, Owen R. Landscape preservation - What is it? Newsletter, American Society of Landscape Architects - Ontario Chapter, vol. 4 no.3, 1987. Scott, Owen R. Tipperary Creek Conservation Area, Wanuskewin Heritage Park. Landscape Architectural Review, May 1986. pp. 5-9. Scott, Owen R. Victorian Landscape Gardening. Ontario Bicentennial History Conference, McMaster University, 1984. Scott, Owen R. Canada West Landscapes. Fifth Annual Proceedings Niagara Peninsula History Conference (1983). 1983. 22 PP. Scott, Owen R. Utilizing History to Establish Cultural and Physical Identity in the Rural Landscape. Landscape Planning, Elsevier Scientific Press, Amsterdam 1979. Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 179-203. Scott, Owen R. Changing Rural Landscape in Southern Ontario. Third Annual Proceedings Agricultural History of Ontario Seminar (1978). June 1979. 20 pp. Scott, Owen R., P. Grimwood, M. Watson. George Laing -Landscape Gardener, Hamilton, Canada West 1808-1871. Bulletin, The Association for Preservation Technology, Vol. IX, No. 3, 1977, 13 pp. (also published in Landscape Architecture Canada, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1978). Scott, Owen R. The Evaluation of the Upper Canadian Landscape. Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Manitoba. 1978. (Colour videotape). CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised October 10, 2019 2-51 Appendix 4 Following is a representative listing of some of the heritage consultations undertaken by Owen R Scott in his capacity as a principal of The Landplan Collaborative Ltd., and principal of CHC Limited. Heritage Master Plans and Landscape Plans o Alton Mill Landscape, Caledon, ON o Black Creek Pioneer Village Master Plan, Toronto, ON o Britannia School Farm Master Plan, Peel Board of Education/Mississauga, ON • Confederation Boulevard (Sussex Drive) Urban Design, Site Plans, NCC/Ottawa, ON o Doon Heritage Crossroads Master Plan and Site Plans, Region of Waterloo/Kitchener, ON o Downtown Guelph Private Realm Improvements Manual, City of Guelph, ON o Downtown Guelph Public Realm Plan, City of Guelph, ON o Dundurn Castle Landscape Restoration Feasibility Study, City of Hamilton, ON o Elam Martin Heritage Farmstead Master Plan, City of Waterloo, ON o Exhibition Park Master Plan, City of Guelph, ON • George Brown House Landscape Restoration, Toronto, ON o Grand River Corridor Conservation Plan, GRCA/Regional Municipality of Waterloo, ON • Greenwood Cemetery Master Plan, Owen Sound, ON o Hamilton Unified Family Courthouse Landscape Restoration Plan, Hamilton, ON • John Galt Park, City of Guelph, ON • Judy LaMarsh Memorial Park Master Plan, NCC/Ottawa, ON o Langdon Hall Gardens Restoration and Site Plans, Cambridge, ON o London Psychiatric Hospital Cultural Heritage Stewardship Plan, London, ON o McKay / Varley House Landscape Restoration Plan, Markham (Unionville), ON o Museum of Natural Science/Magnet School 59/ Landscape Restoration and Site Plans, City of Buffalo, NY o Muskoka Pioneer Village Master Plan, MNR/Huntsville, ON o Peel Heritage Centre Adaptive Re -use, Landscape Design, Brampton, ON o Phyllis Rawlinson Park Master Plan (winning design competition), Town of Richmond Hill, ON o Prime Ministerial Precinct and Rideau Hall Master Plan, NCC/Ottawa, ON • Queen/Picton Streets Streetscape Plans, Town of Niagara -on -the -Lake, ON o Regional Heritage Centre Feasibility Study and Site Selection, Region of Waterloo, ON o Rockway Gardens Master Plan, Kitchener Horticultural Society/City of Kitchener, ON • St. George's Square, City of Guelph, ON • St. James Cemetery Master Plan, Toronto, ON • St. James Park Victorian Garden, City of Toronto, ON o Tipperary Creek (Wanuskewin) Heritage Conservation Area Master Plan, Meewasin Valley Authority, Saskatoon, SK o Whitehern Landscape Restoration Plan, Hamilton, ON • Woodside National Historic Park Landscape Restoration, Parks Canada/Kitchener, ON Cultural Heritage Evaluation Reports (CHER), Cultural Heritage Inventories and Cultural Heritage Landscape Evaluations o Adams Bridge (Structure S20) Cultural Heritage Evaluation Report, Southgate Township, ON o Belanger Bridge Cultural Heritage Evaluation Report, Casey Township, ON o Belfountain Area Heritage Inventory for Environmental Assessment, Peel Region, ON o Bridge #9 -WG Cultural Heritage Evaluation Report, Township of Centre Wellington, ON o Bridge #20 Cultural Heritage Evaluation Report, Blandford -Blenheim Township, ON o Bridge #25 Cultural Heritage Evaluation Report, Blandford -Blenheim Township, ON CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised October 10, 2019 2-52 Appendix 4 0 Chappell Estate / Riverside / Mississauga Public Garden Heritage Inventory, Mississauga, ON 0 8895 County Road 124 Cultural Heritage Opinion Report, Erin (Ospringe), ON 0 County of Waterloo Courthouse Building Cultural Heritage Evaluation Report, Kitchener, ON 0 Cruickston Park Farm & Cruickston Hall - Cultural Heritage Resources Study, Cambridge, ON 0 Doon Valley Golf Course - Cultural Heritage and Archaeological Resources Inventory, Kitchener/Cambridge, ON 0 Government of Ontario Light Rail Transit (GO-ALRT) Route Selection, Cultural and Natural Resources Inventory for Environmental Assessment, Hamilton/Burlington, ON 0 Hancock Woodlands Cultural Heritage Assessment, City of Mississauga, ON 0 Hespeler West Secondary Plan - Heritage Resources Assessment, City of Cambridge, ON 0 Highway 400 to 404 Link Cultural Heritage Inventory for Environmental Assessment, Bradford, ON 0 Highway 401 to 407 Links Cultural Heritage Inventory for Environmental Assessment, Pickering/Ajax/Whitby/Bowmanville, ON 0 Holland Mills Road Bridge Cultural Heritage Evaluation Report, Wilmot Township, ON 0 Homer Watson House Cultural Heritage Evaluation Report, Kitchener, ON 0 Irvine Street (Watt) Bridge Cultural Heritage Evaluation Report, Township of Centre Wellington, ON 0 Lakewood Golf Course Cultural Landscape Assessment, Tecumseh, ON 0 Landfill Site Selection, Cultural Heritage Inventory for Environmental Assessment, Region of Halton, ON 0 Niska Road Cultural Heritage Landscape Addendum City of Guelph, ON 0 154 Ontario Street, Historical - Associative Evaluation, Guelph, ON 0 35 Sheldon Avenue North, Cultural Heritage Evaluation Report, Kitchener, ON 0 Silvercreek (LaFarge Lands) Cultural Landscape Assessment, Guelph, ON 0 South Kitchener Transportation Study, Heritage Resources Assessment, Region of Waterloo, ON 0 53 Surrey Street East and 41, 43, 45 Wyndham Street South Cultural Heritage Evaluation Guelph, ON 0 Swift Current CPR Station Gardens condition report and feasibility study for rehabilitation/reuse, Swift Current, SK 0 University of Guelph, McNaughton Farm House, Cultural Heritage Resource Assessment, Puslinch Township, ON 0 University of Guelph, Trent Institute Cultural Heritage Resource Assessment, Guelph, ON 0 University of Guelph, 1 and 10 Trent Lane Cultural Heritage Resource Assessments, Guelph, ON 0 Uno Park Road Bridge, Cultural Heritage Evaluation Report, Harley Township, ON 0 2007 Victoria Road South Heritage Evaluation, Guelph, ON 0 Waterloo Valleylands Study, Heritage and Recreational Resources mapping and policies, Region of Waterloo 0 69 Woolwich Street (with references to 59, 63-67, 75 Woolwich Street) Cultural Heritage Evaluation Report, Guelph, ON Cultural Heritage Resource Impact Assessments (CHRIA/CHIA/HIS/HIA) and Cultural Landscape Heritage Impact Statements 0 Adams Bridge (Structure S20) Heritage Impact Assessment, Southgate Township, ON 0 33 Arkell Road Heritage Impact Assessment, Guelph, ON 0 86 Arthur Street, Heritage Impact Assessment, Guelph, ON o William Barber House, 5155 Mississauga Road, Heritage Impact Assessment, Mississauga, ON o Barra Castle Heritage Impact Assessment, Kitchener, ON 0 72 Beaumont Crescent Heritage Impact Assessment, Guelph, ON o Biltmore Hat Factory Heritage Impact Assessment, Guelph, ON 0 140 Blue Heron Ridge Heritage Impact Assessment, Cambridge, ON 0 25 Breithaupt Street Heritage Impact Assessment, Kitchener, ON 0 51 Breithaupt Street Heritage Impact Assessment, Kitchener, ON 0 Bridge #20 Heritage Impact Assessment, Blandford -Blenheim Township, ON 0 Bridge #25 Heritage Impact Assessment, Blandford -Blenheim Township, ON CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised October 10, 2019 2-53 Appendix 4 0 215 Broadway Street Heritage Impact Statement, Mississauga, ON Cambridge Retirement Complex on the former Tiger Brand Lands, Heritage Impact Assessment, Cambridge, ON Cambridge Retirement Complex on the former Tiger Brand Lands, Heritage Impact Assessment Addendum Cambridge, ON 0 27-31 Cambridge Street, Heritage Impact Assessment, Cambridge, ON 0 3075 Cawthra Road Heritage Impact Statement, Mississauga, ON 0 58 Church Street Heritage Impact Assessment, Churchville Heritage Conservation District, Brampton, ON City Centre Heritage Impact Assessment, Kitchener, ON 0 175 Cityview Drive Heritage Impact Assessment, Guelph, ON 0 12724 Coleraine Drive Cultural Heritage Impact Statement, Caledon (Bolton), ON 0 12880 Coleraine Drive Cultural Heritage Impact Statement, Caledon (Bolton), ON Cordingly House Heritage Impact Statement, Mississauga, ON 0 264 Crawley Road Heritage Impact Assessment (farmstead, house & barn), Guelph, ON 0 31-43 David Street (25 Joseph Street) Heritage Impact Assessment, Kitchener, ON 0 35 David Street (Phase II) Heritage Impact Assessment, Kitchener, ON 0 75 Dublin Street Heritage Impact Assessment, Guelph, ON 0 24, 26, 28 and 32 Dundas Street East Heritage Impact Statement, Mississauga, (Cooksville), ON 0 1261 Dundas Street South Heritage Impact Assessment, Cambridge, ON 0 172 - 178 Elizabeth Street Heritage Impact Assessment, Guelph, ON 0 19 Esandar Drive, Heritage Impact Assessment, Toronto, ON 0 14 Forbes Avenue Heritage Impact Assessment, Guelph, ON 0 369 Frederick Street Heritage Impact Assessment, Kitchener, ON 0 42 Front Street South Heritage Impact Assessment, Mississauga, ON Grey Silo Golf Course/Elam Martin Farmstead Heritage Impact Assessment, City of Waterloo, ON GRCA Lands, 748 Zeller Drive Heritage Impact Assessment Addendum Kitchener, ON o Hancock Woodlands Heritage Impact Statement, City of Mississauga, ON 0 132 Hart's Lane, Hart Farm Heritage Impact Assessment, Guelph, ON o Holland Mills Road Bridge Heritage Impact Assessment, Wilmot Township, ON 0 9675, 9687, 9697 Keele Street Heritage Impact Assessment, City of Vaughan (Maple) ON 0 13165 Keele Street Cultural Heritage Resource Impact Assessment, King Township (King City), ON 0 151 King Street North Heritage Impact Assessment, Waterloo, ON o Kip Co. Lands Developments Ltd. Cultural Heritage Resource Impact Assessment - Woodbridge Heritage Conservation District, City of Vaughan (Woodbridge) ON 0 20415 Leslie Street Heritage Impact Assessment, East Gwillimbury, ON 0 117 Liverpool Street Heritage Impact Assessment, Guelph, ON 0 36-46 Main Street Heritage Impact Assessment, Mississauga, ON 0 30 - 40 Margaret Avenue Heritage Impact Assessment, Kitchener, ON 0 19 - 37 Mill Street Scoped Heritage Impact Assessment, Kitchener, ON 0 2610, 2620 and 2630 Mississauga Road, Cultural Landscape Heritage Impact Statement, Mississauga, ON 0 4067 Mississauga Road, Cultural Landscape Heritage Impact Statement, Mississauga, ON 0 1142 Mona Road, Heritage Impact Assessment, Mississauga, ON 0 1245 Mona Road, Heritage Impact Statement, Mississauga, ON 0 15 Mont Street, Heritage Impact Assessment, Guelph, ON o Proposed Region of Waterloo Multimodal Hub at 16 Victoria Street North, 50 & 60 Victoria Street North, and 520 & 510 King Street West, Heritage Study and Heritage Impact Assessment, Kitchener, ON 0 6671 Ninth Line Heritage Impact Statement, Cordingley House Restoration & Renovation, Mississauga, ON CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised October 10, 2019 2-54 Appendix 4 0 266-280 Northumberland Street (The Gore) Heritage Impact Assessment, North Dumfries (Ayr), ON 0 324 Old Huron Road Heritage Impact Assessment, Kitchener, ON 0 40 Queen Street South Heritage Impact Statement, Mississauga, (Streetsville), ON o Rockway Holdings Limited Lands north of Fairway Road Extension Heritage Impact Assessment, Kitchener, ON 0 259 St. Andrew Street East Cultural Heritage Assessment, Fergus, ON 0 35 Sheldon Avenue, Heritage Impact Assessment, Kitchener, ON 0 2300 Speakman Drive Heritage Impact Assessment, Mississauga, ON 0 10431 The Gore Road Heritage Impact Assessment, Brampton, ON o Thorny -Brae Heritage Impact Statement, Mississauga, ON 0 7 Town Crier Lane, Heritage Impact Assessment, Markham ON University of Guelph, 3 - 7 Gordon Street Houses, Heritage Impact Assessment, Guelph, ON University of Guelph, Harrison House, Heritage Impact Assessment, Guelph, ON Uno Park Road Bridge, Heritage Impact Assessment, Harley Township, ON Victoria Park Proposed Washroom Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment, Kitchener, ON 0 927 Victoria Road South (barn) Heritage Impact Assessment, Guelph, ON 0 272-274 Victoria Street Heritage Impact Assessment, Mississauga, ON 0 26 - 32 Water Street North Heritage Impact Assessment, Cambridge (Galt), ON o Winzen Developments Heritage Impact Assessment, Cambridge, ON 0 248-260 Woodbridge Avenue Cultural Heritage Resource Impact Assessment and Heritage Conservation District Conformity Report, Woodbridge Heritage Conservation District, City of Vaughan (Woodbridge) 0 35 Wright Street Cultural Heritage Resource Impact Assessment, Richmond Hill, ON 0 1123 York Road Heritage Impact Assessment, Guelph, ON 0 14288 Yonge Street, Heritage Impact Assessment, Aurora, ON Heritage Conservation Plans o William Barber House, 5155 Mississauga Road, Heritage Conservation Plan, Mississauga, ON 0 51 Breithaupt Street Heritage Conservation Plan, Kitchener, ON o Hamilton Psychiatric Hospital Conservation Plan, for Infrastructure Ontario, Hamilton, ON o Harrop Barn Heritage Conservation Plan, Milton, ON 0 120 Huron Street Conservation Plan, Guelph, ON 0 324 Old Huron Road Conservation Plan, Kitchener, ON 0 264 Woolwich Street Heritage Conservation Plan, Guelph, ON 0 14288 Yonge Street Heritage Conservation Plan, Aurora, ON 0 1123 York Road Heritage Conservation Plan, Guelph, ON Heritage Conservation District Studies and Plans o Downtown Whitby Heritage Conservation District Study and Plan, Town of Whitby, ON o MacGregor/Albert Heritage Conservation District Study and Plan, City of Waterloo, ON • Queen Street East Heritage Conservation District Study, Toronto, ON • University of Toronto & Queen's Park Heritage Conservation District Study, City of Toronto, ON Cultural Heritage Landscape Inventories/Studies • Cultural Heritage Landscape Study, City of Kitchener, ON • Cultural Heritage Landscape Inventory, City of Mississauga, ON • Cultural Heritage Scoping Study, Township of Centre Wellington, ON CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised October 10, 2019 2-55 Appendix 4 Peer Reviews o Acton Quarry Cultural Heritage Landscape & Built Heritage Study & Assessment Peer Review, Acton, ON o Belvedere Terrace - Peer Review, Assessment of Proposals for Heritage Property, Parry Sound, ON o Forbes Estate Heritage Impact Assessment Peer Review, Cambridge (Hespeler), ON o Heritage Square Heritage Impact Assessment Peer Review for Township of Centre Wellington (Fergus), ON o Little Folks Heritage Impact Assessment Peer Review for Township of Centre Wellington (Elora), ON o Potter Foundry and the Elora South Condos Heritage Impact Assessment Peer Review for Township of Centre Wellington (Elora), ON Expert Witness Experience • Oelbaum Ontario Municipal Board Hearing, Eramosa Township, ON, 1988 o Roselawn Centre Conservation Review Board Hearing, Port Colborne, ON, 1993 o Halton Landfill, Joint Environmental Assessment Act and Environmental Protection Act Board Hearing, 1994 • OPA 129 Ontario Municipal Board Hearing, Richmond Hill, ON, 1996 o Diamond Property Ontario Municipal Board Hearing, Aurora, ON, 1998 o Harbour View Investments Ontario Municipal Board Hearing, Town of Caledon, ON, 1998 o Aurora South Landowners Ontario Municipal Board Hearing, Aurora, ON, 2000 o Ballycroy Golf Course Ontario Municipal Board Hearing, Palgrave, ON, 2002 o Doon Valley Golf Course Ontario Municipal Board Hearing, Cambridge, ON, 2002 o Maple Grove Community Ontario Municipal Board Hearing, North York, ON, 2002 o Maryvale Crescent Ontario Municipal Board Hearing, Richmond Hill, ON, 2003 o LaFarge Lands Ontario Municipal Board Mediation, Guelph, ON, 2007 0 255 Geddes Street, Elora, ON, heritage opinion evidence - Ontario Superior Court of Justice, 2010 o Downey Trail Ontario Municipal Board Hearing, Guelph, ON, 2010 o Wilson Farmhouse Conservation Review Board Hearing, Guelph, ON, 2014 0 85 Victoria Street, Churchville Heritage Conservation District, Ontario Municipal Board Hearing, Brampton, ON, 2016 o Haylock / Youngblood Development OMB Mediation Hearing, Centre Wellington, ON, 2018 o Riverbank Drive LPAT Mediation Hearing, Cambridge, ON, 2019 cHc CHC Limited DRAFT August 14, 2019, revised October 10, 2019 2-56 Staff Repoil K a{ -i i� vF-x Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Heritage Kitchener DATE OF MEETING: November 5, 2019 SUBMITTED BY: Leon Bensason, Coordinator, Cultural Heritage Planning PREPARED BY: Victoria Grohn, Heritage Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7839 WARD (S) INVOLVED: Ward 4 DATE OF REPORT: November 1, 2019 REPORT NO.: DSD -19-249 SUBJECT: Notice of Intention to Amend Designating By-law 84-52 for 883 Doon Village Road RECOMMENDATION: That pursuant to Section 30 (1) of the Ontario Heritage Act, the Clerk be directed to publish a Notice of Intention to amend designating by-law 84-52 for 883 Doon Village Road. 46 6 2 K76<- 8 42 12 14 821. 28 L Y i � D4 261- Y f29 8 35. 854 T'L 31. 8°841 / 39 "35 33 30 J4 1 3] 8484] / U.. Yllege O 413 8853 Nat... Area 29 26 36 P 868 1] 25 22 42� 'i 49 Y6 46��'�. 53 54, O R5 21 98 „��II 14 18 i / 57 58 � 13 10. � ]0 /\ �Q 3 4 N PIONEER PARK 95 86 2D6 90 96 2� 12, v 3 8 C 1D6 ]J 4 10 4.116 � 81l O8 ..• 2P 8 938 QR' 93 t5 Fy'l 28 24 16 n ��UU 'l.' 97 19 OiyF 32. 2 S{.Vl.r.' 11D1 O 23 Sri._ 0128 11310.4 32 29 24 2D 1V�.' 11 GOON SOUTH „> 121 44\ 156 28 16 n 44 24 12 0 'j0 PFJ\ '33 t 2 953 00 00" 132 J FAR 152 t6tN 5� " � 967 , G40. -... � Es? © 1008 43���j31DP9185-,1D1 81 Tt, Er ch �j Location Map: 883 Doon Village Road *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. 3-1 BACKGROUND: The property municipally addressed as 883 Doon Village Road is located east of Bechtel Drive and south of Doon Village Road. The subject property is presently 1.32 acres in size and contains a historic dwelling, a former Hog and Hen House, and a modern garage. The property is designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. llama ii rot a7r 883 Doon Village Road (Front Elevation) In 2018, the Development Services Department received consent applications B2018-006 through B2018-009 to sever a portion of the property municipally addressed as 883 Doon Village Road to create 4 new lots and 1 retained lot. The Committee of Adjustment approved the consent applications, subject to conditions, on April 17, 2018. In 2019, the Development Services Department received change of conditions applications CC2019-001 through CC2019-004 to extend the timeframe in which to complete the consent conditions associated with applications B2018-006 through B2018-009. The Committee of Adjustment approved the change of conditions applications, subject to conditions, on February 19, 2019. A Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA), prepared by MHBC Planning and dated January 2018, was submitted in support of consent applications B2018-006 through B2018-009. The HIA considered the relocation of the former Hog and Hen House to the retained lot to facilitate the creation of the four new lots and to maintain its existing capacity as a garage/shed. The HIA, which was discussed at the January 91" 2018 Heritage Kitchener meeting, concludes that the preferred conservation option involves relocating the former Hog and Hen House a short distance to the retained lot, which would result in retaining the historical and associative relationship of the former Hog and Hen House with the dwelling. On October 81", 2019, a Heritage Covenant Agreement under Section 37(1) of the Ontario Heritage Act was registered on title of the subject property to secure the property owners' obligation to relocate the former Hog and Hen House. This was a condition of the Committee of Adjustment decisions. The works associated with the relocation of the former Hog and Hen House are being undertaken in keeping with the approved Conservation Plan, prepared by MHBC Planning and dated July 2019. At the time of writing 3-2 this report, the relocation of this structure is presently underway and is anticipated to be complete by the end of November 2019. BECHTEL DR I I rat, 11 Lot 4 Lot 3 Lai 1� — �I Lot t {454m'j I (454m2) I (454m2) i (45W) 'Zk �nfl9lyy� — Ea. Retained Lands WMV (3,517m2) R_ - N �47 LU 0 .J -J [1 D 4 883 Doon Village Road — Proposed Retained and Severed Lands with Relocated Former Hog and Hen House REPORT: One of the conditions associated with consent applications B2018-006 through B2018-009 and change of conditions applications CC2018-001 through CC2019-004 for 883 Doon Village Road is for the property owner to agree to amend Designating By-law 84-52 to reflect the revised heritage attributes listed in the approved HIA, prepared by MHBC Planning dated January 2018, and the revised legal description for the retained lands municipally addressed as 883 Doon Village Road. The HIA notes that the existing designating by-law, attached to this report as Appendix `A', identifies only the dwelling as the attribute that is subject to the designating by-law. The proposed revised list of heritage attributes, outlined in Appendix `B' to this report, identifies additional attributes, including the former Hog and Hen House, which would be subject to the designating by-law once amended. The existing dwelling is identified as the primary heritage attribute of the property and the former Hog and Hen House is identified as a secondary heritage attribute of the property. 3-3 In order to satisfy this condition and implement the recommendations of the HIA, it is recommended that the City Clerk be directed to publish a Notice of Intention to amend designating by-law 84-52 for the property municipally addressed as 883 Doon Village Road. Under Section 30(1) of the Ontario Heritage Act, the Heritage Kitchener committee is required to be consulted prior to Council passing a Notice of Intention to amend a designating by-law. To ensure the designating by-law only applies to the retained lands, and that the attributes referenced in the designating by-law are located on the lands to which the designating by-law applies, City Council's consideration and passing of the amended designating by-law should follow the successful relocation of the former Hog and Hen House onto the retained lands, and once a new legal description for the retained lands is available. In this way, the amended designating by- law can be registered on title for 883 Doon Village Road and will not encumber the severed lots. Archaeology The property municipally addressed as 883 Doon Village Road contains an archaeological site. A Stage 3 site-specific archaeological assessment was conducted on a portion of the property. The assessed portion of the lands, which contain the lands to be severed and the additional area of impact needed to accommodate the relocated former Hog and Hen House and a new driveway, are of no further archaeological concern. However, the unassessed portion of the archaeological site, located within the retained lands, has further cultural heritage value or interest and represents an outstanding archaeological concern. In order to ensure long-term protection of this area, a further amendment to the designating by-law is proposed to contain wording notifying the property owner that any soil disturbance is prohibited by anyone that does not possess a license as provided for under Section 48(1) of the Ontario Heritage Act, and the process to be followed under Section 48(3) of the Ontario Heritage Act for `clearing' a part of an archaeological site and allowing for alterations by a person who is not a licensed archaeologist: "An archaeological site identified as AiHC-491 and subject to Section 48(1) of the Ontario Heritage Act is present within this property. It has been recommended that there is further cultural heritage value or interest for the archaeological site. A detailed sketch/plan showing the location of the archaeological site is available for viewing upon submitting a request to the Heritage Planner, City of Kitchener, 200 King Street West, 6`" Floor, Kitchener, ON, N2G 4G7. No person knowing that a site is an archaeological site shall alter the site, and artifacts or any other physical evidence of past human use or activity shall not be removed from the site without a licence as provided for under section 48(1) of the OHA. Under section 48(3) of the OHA, the restriction on alteration or the removal of an artifact or other physical evidence of past human use and activity from the site will no longer apply when a licensee has completed archaeological fieldwork, within the meaning of the regulations, on the site and an archaeological report has been provided to the Minister stating that the site has no further cultural heritage value or interest and the report is entered into the Ontario Public Register of Archaeological Reports. " This wording was prepared in consultation with the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport, Planning staff at the Region of Waterloo, Planning and Legal Services staff at the City of Kitchener, and the property owner. Although the sketch/plan of the archaeological site will be attached to the designating by-law considered by Council, it might not be attached to the designating by-law for the purposes of registration on title. However, there is notice provided in the appropriate schedule to the designating by-law that the sketch/plan of the archaeological site can be viewed at the City. 3-4 ALIGNMENT WITH CITY OF KITCHENER STRATEGIC PLAN: The recommendation of this report supports the achievement of the city's strategic vision through the delivery of core service. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: 10 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the Heritage Kitchener meeting. CONSULT and COLLABORATE — Heritage Planning staff has consulted and collaborated with the property owner regarding the implementation of the recommendations of the HIA, including amending the designating by-law under the Ontario Heritage Act. The owner has confirmed their support for amending the designating by-law, subject to consideration by Council. Heritage Kitchener will be consulted via circulation and consideration of this report. ACKNOWLEDGED BY: Della Ross, Acting Director of Planning APPENDIX A: Current Designating By-law 84-52 APPENDIX B: Proposed Amendments to Designating By-law (Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest) 3-5 MMOF ILMED REASONS FOR DESIGNATION JUNE 1994 The designation described herein is recommended on historic and architectural grounds. This house was built in IS63 by Tienjarlin Burkholder, a well-known and respected teacher. In terms of architecture, the house is a fine example of the Waterloo Counry Georgian style. 3-6 MICRDFiLMED BY-LATI JUNE 1994 OF THE CORPORATION OF THP CITY OF KITCRrNr,,, (Being a by-law to designate part of the property municipally known as 883 1?oon Village Road in the City of Kitchener as being of historic and architectural value) WHEREAS Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, P.S.O. Chapter 337, authorizes the Council of a Municipality to enact `W -i, -w7 to designate real property, including all buildings and structure, to be of architectural or historical value or interest; AND WHEREAS the Council of The Corporation of the City of Kitchener has caused to be served on the owner of the lands and nriY-,ises known municipally as 883 Doon Village Road in the City of Yitchenpr, and upon the Ontario Heritage Foundation, a Notice of intention to nes'2.q_nA'.,te as being of historic and architectural value that part of the, aforesai-d Y:ea.l property more particuarly hereinafter described, and has caused such ''oboe of intention to be published in a newspaper having general circujat),c;­ in the municipality once for each of three consecutive weeks, - AM WHEREAS no Notice of Objection to the proposed desi,cTnataon has been served upon the Clerk of the Municipality; NOW THEREFORE the Council of The Corporation of tne- Cit�7 of Kitchener enacts as follows: 1. There is designated as being of historic and value that part of the aforesaid real property known as RP! Doon Village Road being comprised of the three hay front. facade, the two side facades all having windows with s3,� panes, over six panes, the front door complete with trans -owl anc' side lights, the one -storey verandah with turned rosts wni-cn extends across the front of the house, the gahle roof with return eaves, the small square attic windows and tt,e two chimneys at either end of the gable roof. 2. The City Solicitor Is hereby authorized to cause a copv of this By-law to be registered against the whole of the 17ropertv described in Schedule "A" hereto (of which the said desi.qnat,-d area forms a part) in the proper land registry office. 3. The Clerk is hereby authorized to cause a copy of tnis to be served on the owner of the aforesaid property an,! on 3-7 �, I CROF C �,ME b - 2 - JUNE 1994 the Ontario Heritage Foundation and to cause notice of r passing of this By-law to be published in tete same nee; sy.,;E.per having general circulation in the community once for each of three consecutive weeks. PASSED at the Council Chambers in the City of Yi.t&,ener "' day of this A.P. A 3-8 MICROMMED SCHEDULE "A" JUNE 1994 ALL AND SINGULAR that certain parcel or tract of land and premises, situate, lying and being in the City of Kitchener, in tne Peiionai Municipality of Waterloo (formerly the County of Waterloo) and vyovnce of Ontario, having an area of 1.322 acres and being composed of Part of T,f-)t Number 2s in Biehn's Tract, in the said City of Kitchener, more nartxctiiariy described as followst BEARINGS herein are astronomic and are referred to the meridian tnrcu,,,n tete southwesterly angle of Lot 53, German Company Tract; COMMENCING, at a point where a standard iron bar is planted on the southwesterly limit of Doon Village Road, at the distance of 161.12 feet, measured South 54 degrees 16 minutes and 30 seconds East therealonq fron the most northerly angle of Part 1 as shown on Waterloo Description Peference Plan Number 127; THENCE South 54 degrees 16 minutes and 30 seconds Fast cortinu:i.nn along{ tare southwesterly limit of Doon Village Road, a distance of 240.00 feet to an iron bar; THENCE South 35 degrees 43 minutes and 30 seconds West, 240.00 feet to an iron bar; THENCE North 54 degrees 16 minutes and 30 seconds West, 240.00 feet tc an iron bars THENCE North 35 degrees 43 minutes and 30 seconds East, 240.00 feet to the Point of Commencement. 3-9 3 -10 MICROFILMED JUNE 1994 CA c cu CD C) w\oo\ zz. :—rm ms 0 m 0 rah C -3 0 tC4 0 = (D H - Itj Co x 0 m rt 14 0 ju rf 0 0 0 I -h rt W (D rn rr It r0 Gr W rt r m A 11 tj t:l 0 m 00 �a �l in (D tD 3 -10 APPENDIX `B' Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest Description of the Property The subject property, addressed as 883 Doon Village Road, is located east of Bechtel Drive and south of Doon Village Road. The property contains a mid -19th century two-storey dwelling, a mid - 191h century one -and -a -half storey coach house (formerly used as a hog and hen barn), and a modern garage. Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest The property municipally addressed as 883 Doon Village Road is recognized for its design/physical and historic/associative values. The property located at 883 Doon Village Road is significant for its design/physical value as it includes a c.1 860s two-storey dwelling constructed in the Waterloo County Georgian architectural style. The property also contains a one -and -a -half storey coach house that has modest design/physical value and displays evidence of being constructed in the mid -191h century, similar to that of the construction date of the dwelling. The coach house is an early and original feature of the former farm complex and is representative of an early agricultural accessory structure. The existing dwelling is the primary heritage attribute of the property and the coach house is considered a secondary heritage attribute. The property is significant for its historical/associative value as it relates to the theme of early agricultural settlement of Doon (now part of the City of Kitchener). The dwelling and coach house were constructed by Benjamin Burkholder. Benjamin Burkholder was born in 1814 in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania and settled on a farm with his family on the German Company Tract lands. Benjamin Burkholder became a teacher in Waterloo Township, teaching in 11 different schools. He retired from teaching in the mid. 1870s and resided on the subject lands. Benjamin Burkholder published a weekly newspaper at Waterloo (Der Morgenstern) from 1839 to 1841. An archaeological site identified as AiHC-491 and subject to Section 48(1) of the Ontario Heritage Act is present within this property. It has been recommended that there is further cultural heritage value or interest for the archaeological site. A detailed sketch/plan showing the location of the archaeological site is available for viewing upon submitting a request to the Heritage Planner, City of Kitchener, 200 King Street West, 61h Floor, Kitchener, ON, N2G 4G7. No person knowing that a site is an archaeological site shall alter the site, and artifacts or any other physical evidence of past human use or activity shall not be removed from the site without a licence as provided for under section 48(1) of the OHA. Under section 48(3) of the OHA, the restriction on alteration or the removal of an artifact or other physical evidence of past human use and activity from the site will no longer apply when a licensee has completed archaeological fieldwork, within the meaning of the regulations, on the site and an archaeological report has been provided to the Minister stating that the site has no further cultural heritage value or interest and the report is entered into the Ontario Public Register of Archaeological Reports. 3-11 Description of Heritage Attributes Primary Heritage Attribute: Benjamin Burkholder Dwelling • Overall two storey massing constructed in buff/yellow brick with side -gabled roof; • Three bay front fagade; • Front entrance with sidelights and transom; • Two side facades with returning eaves at the roofline and small square-shaped window openings and wood frame windows; • All window openings and wood windows with 6x6 panes; • One storey verandah with turned posts which extends across the front of the house; • Paired brick chimneys at either end of the gable roof; and • Location in situ and orientation towards Doon Village Road. Secondary Heritage Attribute: `Coach House' (former Hog & Hen Barn) • Single storey Coach House with wood frame and field stone construction, gabled roof, and original loft door and window openings with wood frame windows; and • Historical and associative relationship to the Benjamin Burkholder dwelling. Views • View of the north elevation of the Benjamin Burkholder dwelling looking south from the private realm (on the subject lands). 3-12 47, � Ng, W A l ,MQWA 40 s ,;LI a .p #� 11` 1r IFI - 1 O t O t O t O t O t 7 m 7 m 7 m 7 m 7 m -i5 75 75 75 75 U O O O O O cl cl OL OL OL OL OL OL OL OL VO O O u 0 0 0 0 0 '6 'm O O .� N LL N LL N LL T m 7 7 7 T 0 7 Q 7 Q 7 Q T T U m T m T T T T T m T T Qu O Q T� Cn O N N O N N N O 0 O O 0 r r 0 p N N N O t O t 0 O t O t O t O t O t O t O t O t O t O t 0 s E mo o m m m m o m m CU T m m m m m m m m m m m m CUT 76 > 16 > (6 > (6 > 7 (0 > 7 (6 > (O > 16 > (6 > (6 > (O >0 (6 >0 16 > 0 O t O t O O �O 5 O O O O O t O p a '3 a '3 a OL '3 a a a a a a '3 a s a N a CU cu a m m a m s m m a m 2 m a m a m a m a m a m a m s m a m N m 0 m 0 m m 0 m 0 m m m m m 0 m m m n m m m m m m m m m m m m m E m m m m m m m m m m m m rn m m m m m m m m m m m m m m> a 0 a 0 a 0 s 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 s a -0 O z 0 0 a m m m _ m _ m m 7 >O 7 >O 7 7 >O 7 >O 3 7 7 7 7 >O 7 7 7 m rw VzJ t_ ` t_ ` t_ t_ ` t_ ` t_ t_ t_ t_ t_ ` t_ t_ t_U F0 3 Q 3 Q 3 3 Q 3 Q 3 3 3 3 3 QCL 3 3 3 cu m m o m o m io o io o io m m io m o m m m H -I m D m D m UU m m m m m m m m m m 0� 0 0 00 000000 000 •y„i 7 7 c IU -I x �iiiii E�� EQQQE E E 00 a � �� 0 �� 0 � �� 0 0 0 ISI N N N N N N d' Of d' w (n 7 N 7 Vl 7 N 7 Ul 7 E E E E E m m m m m U W 0000 N N 00 N c0 O O M O M O N M W O W O W co O O N co r N r N r �$ ^ O O O O N N N N N V N h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L� W, r r m m 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 a) 7 7 3 7 N m lil U LL Q Q 7 7 7 Q Q Q Q (n Q Q Q Q (n In Ln N N r r r N O N O N V O'o rl N > Of Of 10 w `� m m m Q Q in w �_ �_ in in in w w in C C U j Q _ 0 U _ C C C i m .N N a) ` m== N> N X ` O> m m Y in in C a( m m E U `m .� 0 af Uo 2 0 U D n- a N 0 a>i y C7 C1 (7m222-N0NNx 0 r -N0 O� mC7C1wc0 W w�0 S]r N V N M� M M O O O N 0 T c0 O r 0 O I— O O O 00 00 N N Cl)LO Cl) V ? M O l0 Cl) "T 00 O N O V O M N }pi W N O Cl) 00 Cl) O O N co l0 O r 00 D O N M l0 O W O O N co V m O r 00 i -i 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 N N N O N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 > 0 > 0 > 0 > 0 = 0 > 0 > 0 > 0 > 0 > 0 > 0 > = O > O > O > O > O > O = 0 > 0 > 0 > 0 > 0 > 0 > O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x N M O �O I� W 01 O N M O 1D f� W Q1 O N M O- r W Q1 O N'1-1-1-1 M- O 1D f� W Q1 O N M N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M IFI - 1