HomeMy WebLinkAboutDev & Tech Svcs - 2003-05-12DEVELOPMENT & TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES
MAY 12~ 2003
CITY OF KITCHENER
The Development and Technical Services Committee met this date commencing at 7:15 p.m. under
Councillor C. Weylie, Chair, with the following members present: Mayor C. Zehr and Councillors M.
Galloway, G. Lorentz, J. Smola and J. Gazzola.
Officials Present:
Ms. L. MacDonald, Ms. J. Given, Ms. S. Adams and Messrs. J. Fielding, G. Stewart,
J. Willmer, R. Shamess, R. Browning, G. Mann, J. McBride, L. Lynch, G. Borovolis,
L. Masseo, S. Turner and L.W. Neil.
Councillor C. Weylie congratulated Fire Chief Rob Browning on his appointment as President of the
Ontario Association of Fire Chiefs.
1. DTS-03-080 -
KESTREL PLACE / 254 WOOLWICH STREET NORTH
REQUEST FOR NAME CHANGE TO OLD COTTAGE PLACE
BRIDGEPORT - CENTRE WARD
The Committee considered Development and Technical Services Department report DTS-03-
080 dated April 29, 2003 dealing with a proposal to rename Kestrel Place to Old Cottage Place.
It was noted in the report that a group of residents in the Bridgeport North Community who front
a private laneway known as 54 Woolwich Street North had requested a street name change
following development of an adjacent subdivision as these residents now obtain access from
Kestrel Place which is the closest road allowance to the lane. It is requested that Kestrel Place
be renamed to a name that more accurately reflects the history of the area. However since
Kestrel Place is a street name on a registered plan of subdivision, the City must undertake a
formal street name change.
It was pointed out that notice that the Committee would hold a public meeting this date to
consider this matter had previously been given.
Mr. J. Willmer briefly summerized the purpose of the staff report.
Ms. Luella Kains attended representing several residents who have requested a name change
and support the recommendation. She did indicate she had questions as to how residences
would be numbered but would discuss these concerns with staff.
No other delegations were registered respecting this matter.
On motion by Councillor J. Smola -
it was resolved:
"That the renaming of Kestrel Place to Old Cottage Place be approved; and further,
That Legal Services be instructed to prepare the necessary by-law and proceed with the
legal name change process."
DTS-03-058 -
301 SPADINA ROAD EAST
DEMOLITION CONTROL APPLICATION DC 031031SlCB
COOK HOMES LIMITED
WEST - VICTORIA PARK WARD
The Committee was in receipt of Development and Technical Services Department report DTS-
03-058 dated April 30, 2003 dealing with a demolition control application submitted by Cook
Homes Inc. with respect to the property known municipally as 301 Spadina Road East. The
subject property is located along the southern frontage of Spadina Road East between Mill Street
and Russell Street in the Mill - Courtland - Woodside Park Community. The applicant requests
permission to demolish a single detached dwelling in order to allow for the redevelopment of the
site, which also contains a large construction yard, as a 52 unit townhouse complex. It was
noted in the report that a site plan application was submitted and approval in principle granted
subject to Council approval of the demolition application.
Mr. J. Willmer explained the purpose of the application and pointed out that most neighbourhood
DEVELOPMENT & TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES
MAY 12~ 2003
- 59 -
CITY OF KITCHENER
2. DTS-03-058 -
301 SPADINA ROAD EAST
DEMOLITION CONTROL APPLICATION DC 03/03/S/CB
COOK HOMES LIMITED
WEST - VICTORIA PARK WARD (CONT'D)
concerns related to the six issues listed in the report under the section identified as community
feedback. Mr. Willmer noted that as a result of the various concerns that were expressed, Cook
Homes made a number of revisions to its proposal. He also pointed out that because the staff
report was just completed May 2, 2003 it was delivered to affected property owners but a few of
the reports were mailed because they were not deliverable. He indicated that the owner of an
apartment building that received one of the mailed reports had contacted him today to express
concerns. In response to Mayor C. Zehr, Mr. J. Willmer advised that the apartment owner was
advised that a recommendation concerning this matter would be presented to City Council at its
May 20, 2003 meeting should the owner wish to attend as a delegation. Finally, he pointed out
that Transportation Planning staff had given detailed considerations with respect to the access
issues relating to the site plan.
Mr. J. McBride advised that the original site plan provided for only a single access to the site and
following staff review the site plan was revised to allow for 2 access points. He commented that
it was the opinion of Traffic staff that the size of the development did not present a significant
traffic issue.
Mr. lan Cook, Cook Homes Ltd. attended in support of the recommendation in the staff report.
He commented that he was confident the site was appropriate for the development which had
been designed having regard to the site elevation. He noted that the site met current zoning
requirements and commented that while the development was 52 units, in reality it was not as
significant as it sounds given that 26 of the units were one bedroom apartments in the
basements of the dwellings. Mr. Cook also pointed out that he was very aware of the need to
preserve existing vegetation where located on the boundaries of the site.
Mrs. Andrea Thiessen-Regehr attended to advise that she and her husband objected to the
demolition on the basis that the character of the existing home would be lost to the
neighbourhood. She questioned if the character of the townhouses would be such as to
maintain the character of dwellings in the neighbourhood if the project was to proceed. The
delegation advised that their property backs onto the proposed development and that their
concern was a loss of privacy which she suggested could be addressed by planting a double row
of trees along the rear boundary as well as erecting a solid wood fence instead of a chain link
fence. She also expressed concerns that the units were rental rather than owner occupied and
that visitors would be parking on the street.
In response to the delegation, Mr. J. Willmer commented that staff saw the proposal as
beneficial to the neighbourhood given that land use compatibility was being achieved with the
entire property becoming residential rather than it remaining in its present condition as a large
construction yard. Further, he noted that the present zoning would allow for an apartment
building up to 8 storeys in height. On the fencing issue, Mr. Willmer advised staff do not see a
need to require solid wood fencing and on the issue of parking, he advised that the parking
requirement for the site was Iow because of the size of the units but that the amount of parking
being provided was more than the zoning by-law requires.
No other delegations were registered regarding this matter.
On motion by Councillor G. Lorentz -
it was resolved:
"That Demolition Control Application DC 03/03/S/CB (Cook Homes Limited) requesting
permission to demolish one single detached dwelling located at 301 Spadina Road East,
legally described as Plan 434 Lot 3 To Lot 6 Pt Lot 2 Pt Lot 14 To Pt Lot 18 Closed Sts
And Lanes Pt Lot 91 Plan 224, be approved.
It is the opinion of this Committee that approval of this application is proper planning for
the City."
DEVELOPMENT & TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES
MAY 12~ 2003 - 60 -
3. DELEGATION - DUKE STREET EAST RECONSTRUCTION TIMING
- BRIDGEPORT - CENTRE WARD
CITY OF KITCHENER
Messrs. David Gowland, Kyle Urech and Jeff Gordon attended to address what they considered
to be a mis-understanding on the part of the City in regard to the timing for the reconstruction of
Duke Street East. The delegation first made a point of thanking Council for decisions that have
been beneficial to the immediate area, including; reversion of traffic from one way to two way,
development of the new Kitchener Market, the Centre Block redevelopment initiatives, Downtown
infrastructure improvements and strong support from City enforcement staff.
The delegation advised that about 4 years ago they had attended a Committee meeting to
address reconstruction timing for 2 blocks of Duke Street East and the work had been listed in
the Capital forecast at that time to proceed in 4 years. However, they recently found out that the
work had been put off until 2010. Accordingly they requested that the work be re-instated on the
priority list but if it could not be, that curbing and pavement be done as a temporary improvement
at this time.
Mr. L. Lynch confirmed that improvement negotiations have gone on for some years and that the
area roads need reconstruction. He noted that when improvements to streets in the area were
first proposed, the City was in receipt of Provincial road subsidy funding which is no longer the
case. He advised that some remedial work has been done and that Pandora Avenue surfaces
had to be rebuilt before other adjacent streets. He commented on infrastructure assessments
that have been made and that staff have now included the section of Duke Street East from
Cameron to Cedar Streets within the reconstruction which more than doubled the cost of the
project. Mr. Lynch also referred to the challenges faced by the City on budget issues to address
needed / required work. He noted that while the Duke Street project was moved to 2010, staff
will be considering re-assessment as part of the annual budget process and indicated that
reconsideration for 2004 was unlikely but there was a possibility that half the project could be
done in 2005. Mr. Lynch did not support the cost of temporary improvements pending full
reconstruction but agreed to develop cost estimates for Duke Street improvements between
Pandora Avenue and Cameron Street as requested by the delegation.
DELEGATION - MARTIN STREET RECONSTRUCTION TIMING, AND - ENFORCEMENT ISSUES AT 63 COURTLAND AVE. E.
- WEST - VICTORIA PARK WARD
Mr. Burnie Root and Ms. Renate Fischer attended along with Martin Street residents to give an
overhead powerpoint presentation on the condition of Martin Street and request reconstruction
which has been postponed until 2009, as well as request review of the issue of unnecessary
access to Martin Street from 63 Courtland Avenue and it's legality. Such access has created
problems related to parking violations and disregard of the one-way traffic signage on Martin
Street resulting in Martin Street residents requesting a barrier be installed at the rear of 63
Courtland Avenue to prevent access to Martin Street. In summary, the delegation requested
Martin Street be reconstructed and access to/from 63 Courtland Avenue be prohibited.
Mr. L. Lynch advised that reconstruction of Martin Street was introduced into the 10 year Capital
Forecast during the 2002 Budget Deliberations with the intent of undertaking improvements of
some of the streets in the area including Martin Street. He noted infastructure review had shown
that water, sewer, sidewalks and pavement were in bad shape and that the work currently was
slotted to be done in 2009. Meetings have been held with Martin Street residents to discuss their
concerns. Before making further remarks, he asked that the Committee hear from S. Turner
concerning property issues relating to 63 Courtland Avenue.
Mr. S. Turner, Director of Enforcement, advised that Enforcement staff have had continuous
problems with 63 Courtland Avenue pertaining to parking along the Martin Street frontage,
outstanding property standards and outstanding lot maintenance issues. He suggested a
change to the Martin Street streetscape would improve the enforcement issue and limiting
access to Martin Street from 63 Courtland Avenue should be investigated. Mr. Lynch then
continued his presentation and pointed out 200-300 feet of the Martin Street frontage of 63
Courtland Avenue had no curbing as it was totally broken down. He advised that staff had
planned to do an overlay on Martin Street at a cost of $20 - 25,000. to improve the street in the
DEVELOPMENT & TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES
MAY 12~ 2003 - 61 -
CITY OF KITCHENER
DELEGATION - MARTIN STREET RECONSTRUCTION TIMING, AND - ENFORCEMENT ISSUES AT 63 COURTLAND AVE. E.
- WEST - VICTORIA PARK WARD (CONT'D)
short term.
At this point Mr. J. Fielding, CAO, recommended and the Committee agreed that before further
consideration of this issue took place, staff investigate the access issue to Martin Street from 63
Courtland Avenue and report back to City Council at it's meeting to be held May 20, 2003.
5. DELEGATION
DETAILED TRANSPORTATION NETWORK REVIEW OF THE
CAMBRIDGE AREA
CAMBRIDGE AREA ROUTE SELECTION STUDY (CARSS)
PRESENTATION OF FINDINGS OF THE PHASE ONE STUDY AND
RECOMMENDED DIRECTION TO BE TAKEN IN PHASE TWO
The following Regional documents were distributed with the Committee agenda this date:
· Detailed Transportation Network Review (DTNR) April 2003
· DTNR Project Update - Completion of Phase One Study
· DTNR Public Information Centre #2 Comment Form
It was noted in the documents that in September 2002, the Region retained Marshall, Macklin,
Monaghan Ltd. to undertake a Detailed Transportation Network Review (DTNR) for the City of
Cambridge and area. The purpose of the study was to investigate opportunities and resulting
impacts of transportation network solutions in and around Cambridge relating to a 'No Bridge'
option across the Grand River. The objectives of the study were listed in the April 2003
document.
Regional Cambridge Councillor Jane Brewer who is Chair of the Cambridge Carss Study
attended the meeting along with Mr. Dave Durant, Senior Transportation Engineer, Region of
Waterloo in regard to the above referenced Regional documents.
Regional Councillor J. Brewer introduced the subject by reviewing its commencement one year
ago and referenced the consultation processes that have taken place. She suggested that the
Development and Technical Services Committee may just wish to receive their presentation this
date as information or refer the matter back to staff for response.
Mr. D. Durrant, Region of Waterloo gave a overhead presentation. He made reference to the
DTNR and Environmental Assessment processes and summarized input received from public
consultation meetings. He noted that there has been a mixed response from the public on a 'No
Bridge' option. Mr. Durrant commented on: travel behaviour in Cambridge for both north - south
and east - west traffic issues, existing traffic congestion affecting Kitchener at Shantz Hill
leading to King Street and Blair leading to Homer Watson Boulevard, high volume long distance
type truck movements within Cambridge conflicting with local traffic and a need to improve
Cambridge north - south links leading to the highway system, opportunities for creating a more
balanced transportation land use system, broad acceptance to preserve the natural environment
and support for transportation improvements that avoid environmentally sensitive areas. He
summarized potential opportunities for improvement of the transportation network under the
categories of roads, transit and other ideas Mr. Durrant noted that the DTNR study was moving
into Phase 2 which is focused on assessing and identifing the appropriate short term
transportation solution in and around the Cambridge area.
A brief discussion took place during which Mr. Durrant responded to several questions from the
Committee. He indicated that it was his understanding the Homer Watson Boulevard / 401
Bridge was scheduled for widening in 2006 / 07 by the Ministry of Transportation but that the
MTO was concerned about the no bridge solution and may revisit the bridge widening issue.
Councillor M. Galloway pointed out that the original transportation improvement plan within
Cambridge had a number of bridge options which would allow access within Cambridge and
improve traffic flow. He agreed that what was taking place was a short term solution but not
DEVELOPMENT & TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES
MAY 12~ 2003
5. DELEGATION
(CONT'D)
- 62 -
CITY OF KITCHENER
DETAILED TRANSPORTATION NETWORK REVIEW OF THE
CAMBRIDGE AREA
CAMBRIDGE AREA ROUTE SELECTION STUDY (CARSS)
PRESENTATION OF FINDINGS OF THE PHASE ONE STUDY AND
RECOMMENDED DIRECTION TO BE TAKEN IN PHASE TWO
really helpful in the long run. It was his opinion that the study had taken a wrong turn and he was
not sure if Kitchener Council would like to comment in this regard.
DTS-03-083 -
KING STREET EAST REHABILITION PROJECT
FROM STIRLING AVENUE TO OTTAWA STREET
WEST - VICTORIA PARK WARD AND BRIDGEPORT - CENTRE WARD
The Committee considered Development and Technical Services Department report DTS-03-
083 dated May 6, 2003 dealing with the King Street East rehabilitation project from Stirling
Avenue to Ottawa Street which is being undertaken as part of the annual road rehabilitation
program and a request of staff that they be directed to investigate the possibility of incorporating
enhanced streetscape elements as part of the design process. Reference was made in the
report to the Central Neighbourhoods Residential Incentive Program and urban design
guidelines. It was noted that the King Street East Mixed Use Corridor is a primary entrance way
to the City and major transportation corridor from the Provincial highway system to the
Downtown. The project being undertaken provides an opportunity to incorporate streetscape
elements to significantly improve the main approach to the Downtown. The financial implications
of enhancements were discussed in the report with the notation that the City had options which if
incorporated into the road reconstruction would allow for streetscape improvements in the future.
Mr. L. Masseo provided a summary of the purpose of the report, explained the issues and the
range of opportunities that were available for consideration at this time.
Mr. L. Lynch illustrated the improvements to the section of King Street East on a large scale
engineering map pointing out: intersection improvements, where the road would shift slightly
from its present location, possible creation of a boulevard in King Street as it approaches Stirling
Avenue and removal of on-street parking which is infrequently used except on Sundays. He
pointed out that the parking issue has not been discussed with officials of a nearby church and
that the engineering enhancements were within the existing project budget.
Mr. L. Masseo advised that staff were seeking direction to investigate options including
decorative lighting of any kind, whether to maintain the existing light standards or simply provide
piping for conduit to be easily installed in future to enhance streetscape. He indicated that staff
would explore costing and prioritization issues.
Mayor C. Zehr requested an opportunity to review revenue sources that might support the
potential cost of the possible streetscape enhancements.
For the record, a copy of an e-mail dated May 12, 2003 from Mr. Glenn Scheels supporting
streetscape improvements and a response by Mr. L. Lynch was circulated to the Committee.
On motion by Mayor C. Zehr -
it was resolved:
"That consideration of the following staff recommendation in Development &
Technical Services Department report DTS-03-083 be deferred and referred to the
May 20, 2003 Council meetinq and staff be directed to submit costing information
respecting possible streetscape enhancements:
'That staff be directed to investigate the possibility of incorporating enhanced
streetscape elements as part of the King Street East design process in keeping
with the general concepts outlined in the Urban Design Guidelines for the King
Street East Mixed Use Corridor; and further,
DEVELOPMENT & TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES
MAY 12~ 2003
- 63 -
CITY OF KITCHENER
6. DTS-03-083 -
KING STREET EAST REHABILITION PROJECT
FROM STIRLING AVENUE TO OTTAWA STREET
WEST - VICTORIA PARK WARD AND BRIDGEPORT - CENTRE
(CONT'D)
WARD
That staff report back to Council with alternative streetscape plans and detailed
cost estimates.'"
7. SSD-03-069 -
ONTARIO
WASHBURN DRIVE, SITE 147, HURON BUSINESS PARK, PHASE 3
RE-PURCHASE BY THE CITY (OFFER TO SELL FROM 2006479
LTD.)
SOUTH WARD
The Committee was in receipt of Strategic Services Department report SSD-03-069 dated April
15, 2003 dealing with City re-purchase of Site 147 on Washburn Drive in the Huron Business
Park.
Mr. G. Borovilos advised that the purchasers business had experienced a slow down and that
they were not prepared to construct a building at this time. Accordingly, the purchaser has
offered to sell the land back to the City at 90% of the original purchase price in accordance with
a clause in the original offer to purchase.
On motion by Coucnillor M. Galloway -
it was resolved:
"That the City accept an Offer to Sell from 2006479 Ontario Limited for the lands
described as Part of Lot 12 Registrar's Compiled Plan 1471 being Parts 16 and 29 on
Reference Plan 58R-7426 (Site 147, Washburn Drive, Huron Business Park) having an
area of about 1.84 acres for the sum of $132,487.20; and further,
That the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute any necessary documentation required
by the City Solicitor."
DTS-03-078 - EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
REQUEST FOR DIRECTION TO CONTINUE PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT
The Committee was in receipt of Development and Technical Services Department report DTS-
03-078 dated April 29, 2003 requesting Council support and direction to staff to continue
development of the City's emergency management program as described in the staff report. It
was noted in the report that the Emergency Management Act proclaimed on April 15, 2003 was
mandatory legislation that requires all municipalities and designated provincial ministrys to have
an Emergency Management Program. The staff report generally outlines the responsibilities of
the municipality as defined in the Emergency Management Act. It was pointed out that the
program had 3 components being: essential, enhanced and comprehensive. The tasks to be
completed within one year of the date of proclamation were listed in the report as well as the
activities that must be accomplished to achieve those tasks. Also, work that has been
undertaken to date and in various stages of completion was itemized in the staff report along with
an action plan broken down into what has to be completed within 2 months, within 2 - 8 months
and within 12 months.
Fire Chief Rob Browning and G. Mann, Acting Platoon Chief provided an overhead PowerPoint
presentation describing the Emergency Management Act and its implications. Their
presentation focused on the essential components of the emergency management program as
they relate to the City of Kitchener.
Following a question from Councillor J. Gazzola, Mr. J. Fielding, CAO commented that there
were a lot of unanswered political questions with respect to the relationship between the City and
the Region and ultimate responsibility for co-ordination in a local emergency that had implications
Region wide. Mayor C. Zehr agreed that clarity was needed with respect to the communication
role and in response Chief Browning pointed out that staff would be meeting with other
DEVELOPMENT & TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES
MAY 12~ 2003 - 64 -
CITY OF KITCHENER
municipalities to further define roles. Mr. J. Fielding commented that another aspect of this
DTS-03-078 - EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
REQUEST FOR DIRECTION TO CONTINUE DEVELOPMENT (CONT'D)
issue was to point out how the Regional Emergency Centre was used by the City until such time
as the Region activated its emergency program at which time City staff would have to relocate.
On motion by Councillor G. Lorentz -
It was resolved:
"That staff be directed to continue developing the City's 'Emergency Management
Program' as set out in Development and Technical Services Department report DTS-03-
078."
DTS-03-077 - CEDAR HILL SOCIAL ISSUES STUDY
WEST - VICTORIA PARK WARD
The Committee considered Development and Technical Services Department report DTS-03-
077 dated May 7, 2003 entitled Cedar Hill Social Issues Study. It was noted in the report that
staff from several City departments have been involved in initiatives to identify and address some
of the issues raised by the Cedar Hill Neighbourhood as attributable to the proximate location of
a large number of social services, supportive and / or assisted housing. At this time staff were
requesting clear direction from Council to have undertaken a comprehensive study to address
the issue in a broader perspective. It was pointed out in a background section of the report that
in February 2002 City Council adopted a Downtown Action Committee recommendation to
consider the issue of perceived concentration of social services in the inner city and the
Downtown both immediately and through a long term planning strategy.
Ms. J. Given briefly summarized the purpose of the report and commented on the establishment
and activity of the Cedar Hill Action Plan team which was later followed by the establishment of
the Kitchener Downtown Community Collaborative. She advised that notwithstanding the level of
involvement and effort made to date, limited progress has been made and actions taken have not
shown measurable improvement. Ms. Given then introduced the recommendation in the staff
report and commented that it was hoped the study would foster positive change to take hold in
the Cedar Hill Area.
Mr. J. Willmer, Director of Planning advised that if the Committee was to support the
recommendation in the staff report, staff propose that it be referred to the Special Council
meeting this date for ratification following which staff proposed to introduce for Council
consideration an interim control By-law under Section 38 of the Planning Act that would establish
a one year moratorium on certain development in Cedar Hill. He advised that copies of the
proposed by-law have been given to the Clerk and were available for distribution to interested
parties. Mr. Willmer noted the intent of staff was to complete the study within one year but if
necessary Council could extend an interim control by-law to 2 years.
Mayor C. Zehr commented that City Council has heard repeated concerns regarding the Cedar
Hill Area for some time and that there were issues that needed to be addressed to foster change
in the area.
On motion by Councillor G. Lorentz -
it was resolved:
"That City staff be directed to undertake or have undertaken, a comprehensive study of
the neighbourhood bounded by Charles Street East to the North, the rear of those
properties fronting the west side of Madison Avenue South, Courtland Avenue East to the
south, and Benton Street to the west to include the following:
· Description of the neighbourhood, including a determination of the housing mix (single
family dwellings, rental properties, social housing, lodging houses, and homes operated
by social service organizations).
· An analysis of the impact of the various forms of housing on the neighbourhood.
DEVELOPMENT & TECHNICAL SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES
MAY 12~ 2003 - 65 -
CITY OF KITCHENER
· Identification and characterization of any cycles or trends impacting the neighbourhood
DTS-03-077 - CEDAR HILL SOCIAL ISSUES STUDY
- WEST - VICTORIA PARK WARD (CONT'D)
and a consideration of how these trends influence community well-being.
· Analysis of the health of the neighbourhood relative to relevant models, such as the
Healthy Communities Model.
· Recommendations for subsequent action based on findings."
The Committee directed that this recommendation be referred for consideration and ratification
to the Special Council meeting of this date which is being reconvened immediately following the
conclusion of the Development and Technical Services Committee meeting.
10. DTS-03-082 - TRAFFIC CONTROL IN NEW SUBDIVISIONS
The Committee was in receipt of Development and Technical Services Department report DTS-
03-082 dated May 2, 2003 pertaining to traffic controls in new subdivisions. The report
describes processes involved with the implementation of and responsibility for traffic controls in
new subdivisions on the part of both the developer and the City.
11. ADJOURNMENT
On motion, the meeting adjourned at 9:34 p.m.
L.W. Neil, AMCT
Assistant City Clerk