HomeMy WebLinkAboutEnv - Urban Forest Management Plans - Pilot ProjectA Sustainable Urban Forest
For Today and Future Generations
~.
~~ _~ _ ~:
~r
~ ~~` ~ __
F~
PI-p-NT
Trees planted around
1892, became mature
trees 60 years later(1954).
In 2010, 119 years later
some of the trees are still Z
'O alive providing benefits to ~
~O the community ~~
~~
~~
/~
~P
Schneider & David St. 1954 (H. Russel)
Schneider & David St. 2009
Schneider & David St. 1982 (H. Russel)
Report Context
Creating a Sustainable Urban Forest
Yellow Fish Road Program
Context
Trees and the larger urban forest play an important role in the economic, environmental and social
health of a community. Aligned with the City's strategic priorities, the urban forest plays an important
role in issues important to the community including air quality, social benefits and storm water man-
agement. The interest and participation from the community also shows a high level of support for
Kitchener's urban forest.
A sustainable urban forest is one that maximizes the benefits to the community for the least cost
for current and future generations. Recognizing the lifespan of trees and the permanence of natural
areas, a long term vision and plan is essential. The primary focus of this report is on lands owned and
managed by the City. Recognizing the importance and role of the private urban forest much of the
content of this report also applies to private lands.
Staff are bringing this information to the Environmental Committee as information and to receive
feedback. In June, staff will return to the committee with recommendations for developing a sustain-
able urban forest.
Painted turtle with radio transmitter
Stewardship Rangers
Winter Nature Walk
Kitchener's Urban Forest
A Forest Within the City
The urban forest includes all of the planted and naturally occurring trees on public
and private lands. Viewed from above individual trees create a forest canopy that
covers many parts of the city. A living organism, trees are a key part of the urban
ecosystem and intricately connected to the surrounding living and non-living parts
of the urban ecosystem.
Components of the Public Urban Forest
• Street Trees
• Active Parkland (e.g. Victoria Park)
• Natural Areas
• Cemeteries & Golf Courses
• Other City Lands
• Other Gov't Agencies (GRCA)
Components of the Private Urban Forest
• Residential Property
• Commercial & Industrial Lands
• Agricultural Lands
Community Support
The support for Kitchener' s urban forest is strong. Since early 2000 the City has had some of the
most progressive tree protections standard on road reconstruction projects due to community de-
mand. Neighbourhoods (e.g. Westmount & Auditorium Neighbhourhood Associations) value their
trees and have a keen interest in keeping their trees and community healthy.
Community groups (e.g. Friends of Laurentian Wetland, Residents of Lakeside Park) are being cre-
ated out of their concern and interest in local natural area. Kitchener's Natural Areas Program, a pro-
gram that offers stewardship and educational programs, is growing at an exponential rate and contin-
ues to build partnerships (e.g. Evergreen Foundation, Kitchener-Waterloo Field Naturalist, Waterloo
Stewardship Network).
Policy & Strategic Connections
Trees and natural areas on city lands are the responsibility of the Operations Division, and are pro-
tected under City Bylaws. The Planning Department is responsible for Natural Heritage Planning
and the conservation of trees during development. The urban forest is recognized in the City's Parks
Master Plan and Strategic Plan for the Environment. Kitchener's urban forest will be part of the new
Official Plan and is one of the twelve assets identified in the City's Asset Management Project. Rec-
ognizing the benefits of the urban forest, direct links can also be made to the City's Plan for a Healthy
Community and Strategic Plan.
{ '~ { ~!
,:
2-
Aview of Kitchener's Urban Forest from City Hall
Trees & A Healthy Community
The Economic, Environmental & Social Benefits
The historical view of the urban forest was that it provided aesthetic beauty to the
community and was something that was supported in good times. Today the
empirical biological and social science data shows the urban forest is an essential
asset that helps build and maintain a healthy community.
Environmental Services from the urban forest
• Air quality
• Economic development and aesthetics
• Energy savings
• Human health and well-being
• Local climate modification
• Natural & cultural heritage conservation
• Safer communities
• Stormwater, water quality, flooding & erosion
• Wildlife habitat
iTree Eco
Developed by the United States Forest Service, iTree Eco is a scientifically tested model that can
accurately quantify the value of the urban forest. First developed to calculate the benefits of the
urban forest in terms of carbon sequestration and the mitigation of air pollutants, the model was
recently expanded to include a hydrological component, and work is underway to add a social
component. In setting up permanent sample points, iTree Eco also becomes a long term monitoring
program of the public and private urban forest. It has become the standard throughout North
America and the world for communities that want an accurate picture of the value of their urban for-
est. Anumber of municipalities in southern Ontario have already completed an iTree Eco study. The
chart below summarizes the results for London, Oakville and Toronto. A review of the data shows
that the value and contributions of the urban forest is significant. Kitchener would benefit from carry-
ing out its own iTree Eco study.
iTree Eco -Replacement Value & Annual Environmental Services
London Oakville Toronto
Replacement Value 1.5 billion 878 million 7 billion
Annual Environmental Services 6.6 million 2.1 million 60 million
(calculated values are for the public and private urban forest)
Experiencing & writing about nature
Corporate Asset Management
Includes the Public Urban Forest
Asset management is the provision of a required level of service in a cost effective
manner at an acceptable level of risk. The City's street and park trees and natural ar-
eas are one of the twelve corporate assets identified by the City. Asset management
includes maintaining an inventory of the resource, linking the inventory data to the work
order system, identifying life cycles, service levels, operational and management plans.
Determining What You Have -Inventories
Operations is making good progress taking inventory of the public urban forest resource. A GIS
based program has been used to inventory all City street trees, and will be used this summer to map
trees in parks. Branch sampling is being used to determine the density and presence of Emerald Ash
Borer. Advanced tree assessment tools are used to preserve old growth trees on city streets. Natural
area data (vegetation mapping, rare plant species, park infrastructure, invasive species, wildlife and
aquatic inventories) is maintained in a GIS database.
Life Cycles
Managing the life cycle is a key component of asset management. In contrast to other assets, trees
are living organisms and increase in value as they age. Recognizing this, sustainable urban forest
management requires that traditional asset management be integrated with ecosystem management.
The figure below, for a large stature tree, shows that the tree does not start providing significant
benefits until its' mid to mature lifestages. To ensure goals set by the community are achieved Best
Management Practices that control management and maintenance are required.
Life Cycle Plant Establish Young Mid Age Mature Heritage
Age (yr) 0 1 - 2 3 -25 26 - 50 51 - 100 > 100
Value Low Low Moderate High Very High High
Best Management Practices
The use of Best Management Practices(BMP) ensures
that decisions and actions are based on the best
knowledge at the time, and that tasks are carried out in
a cost effective manner. With advances in knowledge
and science BMP need to be updated as required. This
is best achieved through adaptive management. The
success of new practices also needs to be measured
through the setting of performance targets.
2-
EAB gallaries found during branch sampling
Tree Canopy
Kitchener's Tree Canopy is 22%
Tree canopy is a measure of the percentage of the City covered by trees. American
Forests recommends communities work towards achieving 40% tree canopy.
Tree Canopy by Ward
The figure to the right shows the percent trE
canopy by ward.
Measuring Tree Canopy
In leaf aerial photography from 2007 was
used to determine Kitchener's tree canopy.
Spatial analysis work was completed by the
University of Vermont. The existing and
potential tree canopy were determined.
How does Kitchener compare?
Compared to other municipalities that have completed a tree canopy study in southern Ontario
Kitchener's tree canopy falls in the middle.
Establishing Tree Canopy Goals
Municipalities have started to set tree canopy goals (e.g. Oakville 40%, Toronto 35%). Prior to
Kitchener establishing a tree canopy goal it should first determine the total leaf area and density.
This is best done through an iTree Eco study.
Street Trees
Much more than aesthetic beauty
The planting of trees along Kitchener's streets has been a tradition since the late
1800's. Today more than 45,000 trees line residential streets. Like other parts of the
urban forest, street trees provide much more than aesthetic beauty.
Street Tree Inventory
Inventories provide a big picture view of the urban forest. A look at the diameter classes of the street
trees shows that 74% of the trees are less than 30cm in diameter. As these trees grow into the larger
diameter classes the benefits the community gains from the street trees will increase significantly.
The species diversity data shows four genuses (Maple, Basswood, Ash, Ivory Silk) that account for
75% of the street tree population. With the arrival of Emerald Ash Borer, 10% of the population may
be lost over the next ten years. Access to this type of information allows urban forest managers to
make good decisions that maximize the benefits to the community in a cost effective manner.
Westmount Neighbhourhood Association
With funding through LEAF, Operations is developing a pilot street tree management plan with the
Westmount Neighbourhood Association. This project came about through the neighbourhood's
concern about their declining street trees and the City's recognition of the need for a sustainable
management plan.
Currently staff are working with the community to address their concerns while also setting in place
a long term plan. Several key strategies (e.g. master tree planting plan, stewardship and education,
tree and soil habitat conservation, structural pruning, Norway maple management and removal plan,
and an implementation plan) are key themes in the plan. This pilot project will also provide the
framework for future plans. The Auditorium Neighbourhood Association has already expressed an
interest in seeing a similar plan developed for their area.
2-7
Pilot Street Tree Management Plan
Kitchener's Natural Areas
Nature in the City
Valued by the community, natural areas are one of the strategic themes in the Parks
Master Plan. Natural areas are the most dominant piece of the City's park system
accounting for more than 60% (975 hec) of the park land base. Natural areas provide
significant benefits to the community. The primary goals are to conserve the City's
natural heritage, while providing places where people can experience nature in the city.
Kitchener's Natural Areas Program
With the hiring of a full time Natural Area Coordinator there has been significant growth in Kitchener's
Natural Areas Program. Community interest in the programing continues to grow. Education and
stewardship are key elements of a sustainable urban forest program. As this program grows the
community becomes more aware of the natural environment and what they can do to help conserve
these areas for future generations.
Pilot Natural Area Management Plan
Friends of Laurentian Wetland
With funding through LEAF, Operations is developing a pilot natural area management plan for the
Laurentian Wetland. The project evolved from a teacher at W T Townsend School who had an inter-
est and concern about the local wetland. Kitchener's Natural Areas Program became involved with
an event hosted by the school and local neighbourhood. Since that time the interest has expanded to
include the Williamsburg Community Centre, John Sweeney School, Kitchener Waterloo Field
Naturalists and the community at large.
In developing a natural area management plan a number of issues must be addressed including: the
dual purpose of the wetland in terms of natural heritage conservation and storm water management,
conservation (e.g. turtles) and management (e.g. Canada Geese) of wildlife, appropriate public
access, invasive species, habitat expansion and encroachments. Once completed this pilot project
will provide the framework for other plans. Other community groups have already expressed an inter-
est in seeing a project like this in their neighbhourhood(e.g. Residents of Lakeside Park).
Meadow Restoration
Current & Emerging Issues
For a Sustainable Urban Forest
1. Emerald Ash Borer(EAB)
The cost and impact of EAB will be significant. For the City's 4,522 ash street trees the cost will be
4.5 million dollars over ten years to remove and replace these trees. The cost for the City to deal with
trees in its' parks and natural areas is not currently known. Burlington estimates their costs will ex-
ceed 10 million dollars. Recently developed tools and practices now allow municipalities to manage
the costs and impacts of EAB.
2. Global Warming
Climate change will impact the urban forest. While warming trends provide opportunities for new
tree species the performance of some existing species will also decline.
3. Large Stature Trees & Soil Habitat
Recognizing that large stature trees at maturity provide the greatest benefits to the community, action
must be taken to ensure that; 1) existing large stature trees and their soil habitat are managed and
protected, and 2) that new tree planting efforts focus on the planting of large stature trees and the
establishment of the required soil volumes to grow trees to their mature size.
4. Intensification & Competing Interests
Creating a sustainable urban forest requires that the biological needs of mature trees be planned for,
and that trees be given equal consideration during development. New planning strategies that focus
on intensification and the establishment of bike lanes are just two examples of the potential of losing
tree canopy unless the requirements of trees are recognized and planned for.
5. Invasive Species
Through human activity invasive species have become a serious threat to natural areas. Dog
strangling vine, Buckthorn and Garlic mustard are three of the more serious threats. Education,
stewardship and active management of invasive species (hand pulling, chemical control) will
be necessary to conserve the integrity of Kitchener's natural areas.
6. Encroachments
Encoachments into natural areas are a serious problem that have negative impacts on the structure
and function of natural areas. Addressing public use and the way people live adjacent to natural areas
will be a key theme in the managemnet plans.
6. Stewardship & Active Management
As seen through the growth of Kitchener's Natural Areas Program there is a strong interest in urban
forestry stewardship. Coupled with active management these two activities will be key elements in
developing a sustainable urban forest.
2-
Urban Forest Sustainability
Maximizing the economic, environmental & social benefits
A sustainable urban forest is one that maximizes the benefits to the community for the least cost for
current and future generations. Recognizing the lifespan of trees and the permanence of natural
areas a long term vision and plan is essential.
While the City cannot achieve a sustainable urban forest on its own, it does have the opportunity to
provide leadership on this issue. Community engagement, education and stewardship will be the key
elements. To provide direction, staff have developed eight urban forestry principles to guide
community participation, long term planning\asset management, the development of management
and implementation plans, best management practices, urban forest operations along with
future capital and operational funding.
Urban Forest Principles
1. Recognize the urban forest as an important community asset contributing to a
healthy city.
2. Engage the community in the conservation, management and stewardship of
the urban forest.
3. Maximize the economic, environmental and social benefits in a sustainable
manner for a healthy city.
4. Optimize the urban tree canopy.
5. Manage the public urban forest infrastructure within an integrated asset and
ecological framework.
6. Use emerging science, technology and practices to create a sustainable urban
forest.
7. Protect, manage and renew the public tree resource and soil habitat.
8. Conserve and restore public natural areas while providing community access.
"Keeping large stature trees
healthy and functional is
one of the best investments
communities can make."
Dr. McPherson
Centre for Urban Forest Research
Pacific Southwest Research Station
Forest Service, USDA
Determining the structural intergrity of an old tree.
Next Steps
Questions
Next Steps
• Urban Forest Webpage Launched on City Website (March 29th)
• Westmount Neighbhourhood Association Public Meeting (March 29th)
Presentation of the Draft Street Tree Management Plan
• Urban Forest Sustainability -Public Information Session (April -May)
• Laurentian Wetland Pilot Natural Area Management Plan (Ongoing)
• Recommendations - A Sustainable Urban Forest -For Today & Future Generations
Presentation to Environmental Committee (June 2011)
• Recommendations - A Sustainable Urban Forest -For Today & Future Generations
Presentation to Community & Infrastructure Services
-~~ ~_
View from City Hall overlooking Victoria Park
Questions for the Environmental Committee
1. Recognizing the economic, environmental and social benefits of the urban
forest, does the Committee support the idea of developing a sustainable
urban forest?
2. Does the Committee have any comments concerning the proposed "Urban
Forest Principles"?
2 - 11
Invasive Species Removal
2-12