HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011-03-07
AUDIT COMMITTEE MINUTES
MARCH 7, 2011
CITY OF KITCHENER
The Audit Committee met this date commencing at 4:24 p.m.
Present:
Councillor Z. Janecki - Chair
Councillors S. Davey, F. Etherington, Y. Fernandes, K. Galloway, J. Gazzola, D. Glenn-
Graham, B. loannidis, P. Singh and B. Vrbanovic.
Staff:
C. Ladd, Chief Administrative Officer
D. Chapman, Deputy CAO/Finance & Corporate Svcs
J. Will mer, Deputy CAO/Community Svcs
P. Houston, CAO/lnfrastructure Svcs
M. May, Interim Director of Human Resources
L. MacDonald, Director of Legal Services
R. Lebrun, Manager of Accounting
S. Brisbane, Supervisor of Financial Reporting
D. Gilchrist, Committee Administrator
1. AUDIT COMMITTEE ORIENTATION
Mr. D. Chapman gave a brief explanation to the Committee advising that this municipality has
both an internal and an external auditor. He advised that the Municipal Act prescribes that
municipalities must have an external auditor to audit the municipality's annual financial
statements. He then advised that like many municipalities, the City of Kitchener has an
internal auditor, who reviews best practices.
Ms. Tasker then provided the Committee with an orientation as to their responsibilities, terms
of reference as prescribed by Council Policy 1-66 and covered the internal audit function. In
that regard the Committee had been provided with Finance and Corporate Services
Department report FCS-11-021, dated February 11, 2011.
2. 2011 EXTERNAL AUDIT WORK PLAN
The Committee was in receipt of Finance and Corporate Services Department report FCS-11-
048, dated March 2, 2011, recommending approval of the External Audit Planning Report as
prepared by KPMG. Ms. Brisbane presented the report advising that 1 of the responsibilities of
this Committee is to approve the external audit plans. She also advised that a Request for
Proposal was issued by the City in 2009 which resulted in KPMG being appointed as the City's
auditor for a 5 year period. She stated that the auditor's opinion adds credibility to the financial
statements.
Mr. T. Mennill, CA, KPMG, was in attendance and presented their Audit Planning Report for
the year ending December 31, 2010.
On motion by Councillor B. Vrbanovic-
it was resolved:
"That the 2011 External Audit Planning Report, prepared by KPMG and attached as
Appendix 1 to Finance and Corporate Services Department report FCS-11-048, be
approved."
3. FCS-11-022 - 2010 YEAR IN REVIEW - AUDIT STATUS REPORT
- and -
FCS-11-023 - 2011 INTERNAL AUDIT WORK PLAN
Ms. Tasker then reviewed two staff reports: FCS-11-022, dated January 20, 2011, which
reviews the work done by the internal auditor in 2010; and, FCS-11-023, dated February 11,
2011 , which presents the internal audit work plan for 2011 .
Respecting the Central Maintenance Facility, Councillor Fernandes questioned whether an
audit would be completed and was advised by Ms. Tasker that she will only be auditing stores.
Ms. Houston advised that efficiencies have been anticipated in the business case and these
will be reported to Council later this year.
AUDIT COMMITTEE MINUTES
MARCH 7, 2011
- 2 -
CITY OF KITCHENER
3. FCS-11-022 - 2010 YEAR IN REVIEW - AUDIT STATUS REPORT (CONT'D)
- and -
FCS-11-023 - 2011 INTERNAL AUDIT WORK PLAN - (CONT'D)
Ms. Tasker noted that the work plan contains internal audit work only and she reviewed the
type of audit required for each as well as estimated duration and preferred timing, noting that
some of the audits are either in process or already complete.
Ms. Tasker then advised that some members of Council have made suggestions to her of
other audits they would like completed: Revenue cash counter controls audit, extent of
nepotism, building permits cash controls audit and Administrative expenses
controls/compliance. In response to these requests, Ms. Tasker advised that nepotism can be
made part of the hiring transparency audit. As the Revenue cash counter controls audit and
the Building permits cash controls audit will each take approximately 1 week, they can be
accommodated in the 2011 work plan. However, controls/compliance respecting
Administrative expenses could take a considerable amount of time, depending on the scope,
and can not be accommodated in the work plan this year.
The Committee was provided with a detailed summary of the Administrative expenses for
2010, including enterprises, by Ms. Ladd. Referring to the last page of the summary, Mr.
Chapman noted that if the storm water management rebates are included, the increase in
2011, as approved by council, will be 5.20/0 over 2010 and if the storm water management
rebates are not included, the increase for 2011 will be 0.60/0. Respecting cash short/over,
$899,000 will be included in the budget for the Parking Enterprise; and, referring to page 27 of
57, Mr. Chapman noted that $614,000 for storm water rebates belongs to that utility. The
balance of the other budget lines is similar from year to year. Mr. Chapman then advised that
the type of audit required for administrative expenses will take 1-2 months, so if it is to be
done, something on the work plan will have to be removed.
Councillor Vrbanovic advised that he had requested the audit of administrative expenses;
however, he is satisfied with the explanation provided.
Councillor Singh questioned miscellaneous expenses and Mr. Chapman advised that he is not
certain that the figure is final. He stated that Ms. Brisbane will present the final 2010 Budget at
the next meeting.
Councillor Fernandes questioned conferences and travel expenses and was advised that
Finance staff will provide that information.
On motion by Councillor P. Singh
it was resolved:
"That the 2011 work plan for Internal Audit be approved as outlined in Finance and
Corporate Services Department report FCS-11-023 and amended to include the
following:
a) that the extent of nepotism be added to the hiring transparency audit,
b) that a cash controls audit of the building permit function be undertaken; and,
c) That a controls audit of the Revenue cash counter be undertaken."
4. ADJOURNMENT
This meeting adjourned at 2:45 p.m.
D. Gilchrist
Committee Administrator