Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutINS-11-029 - Asset Management Service Delivery StrategyStaff Re~p~r~ I~~rc~~nT~~ lnfrastrurture Services Department REPORT TO: DATE OF MEETING: SUBMITTED BY: PREPARED BY: WARD(S) INVOLVED: DATE OF REPORT: REPORT NO.: SUBJECT: Council May 9, 2011 www.kitchenerca Dan Chapman, Deputy CAO Finance & Corporate Services (519-741-2347) Hans N. Gross, P (519-741-2416) All April 5, 2011 INS 11-029 Eng., Director of Asset Management Asset Management Service Delivery Strategy Phase 1 -Asset Management Gap Analysis Report RECOMMENDATION: For information EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City of Kitchener has established a corporate asset management program as an outcome of the Asset Management (AM) Service Delivery Strategy developed in late 2009. The asset management program is a holistic approach to managing the City's assets, incorporating all aspects of asset maintenance and service delivery. Some examples of assets include roads, sewers, buildings, vehicles. Asset management is the combination of management, financial, economic, engineering, and other practices applied to physical assets with the objective of providing the required level of service in the most cost-effective manner at an acceptable level of risk. It comprises all elements needed for lifecycle asset management. The purpose of the Gap Analysis is to determine the gap between the City's current asset management practices and best practices for all of the City's assets. The goal of the report is to identify opportunities for improvement that will move the City from where it is to the best appropriate practice. The City's goal and strategic directions for asset management are: Goal: Develop an asset management program that ensures the availability and sustainability of existing and future assets in response to legislation, corporate goals, the community and growth. 1(b)-1 Staff Re~p~r~ ~1ITCH~1`r?E~ 1lI~CQStrl~fi?'UC~ Se!'VICES D~p(1rf1?1~11~ w~+w.kitthenerca Strategic Directions: • Affordable Services -Link the operating and capital funding levels to the required levels of service for each asset type with a view to providing the flexibility to respond to changing conditions and managing risk. • Dependable Services -Set priorities for asset rehabilitation and replacement based on a combination of the business risk exposure and appropriate lifecycle treatment strategies. • Planned Maintenance -Develop advanced asset management plans comprising long range funding requirements for both the existing and future asset inventories. • Prioritized Funding -Link the Asset Management Plans to the City's direction for financial management. While the City has made a number of significant investments that will support the asset management program going forward, notwithstanding these accomplishments, some of the key elements of sound asset stewardship remain to be put in place. The identified gaps in the City's practices provide the basis for the improvement projects which are detailed in the Gap Analysis Report. BACKGROUND: Capital asset management represents a core business function for the City of Kitchener given the considerable number and value of assets that are owned and maintained by the municipal government (almost 300,000 individual assets with a replacement cost of about $2.5 billion). Despite a sizeable asset base, the approach to asset management is often informal, lacking high-level corporate oversight and coordination. Refer to attached Appendix 1 for a list of the City's Asset Groups. The introduction of new tangible capital asset accounting standards has provided the City of Kitchener a platform from which to launch leading edge systems to support asset management. These systems will maintain the corporate asset inventory and also provide a corporate tool for decision support. These changes provide an opportunity to improve the coordination between City departments to ensure that efficiencies resulting from new technology are maximized and that decisions are made in the future to optimize the use of taxpayer/ratepayer funds for capital investment. In 2009, the City prepared an Asset Management Service Delivery Strategy (Report FIN-10- 026) in consultation with asset managers from across the City. The strategy was vetted thoroughly and was endorsed by City Council at its regular meeting held on February 22, 2010. 1(b)-2 S~a~ff Re~p~rt IIITCH~I~TE~ lnfrastrurture Services Depa~rfl)1ellit www.kitthenerca The Strategy proposed a number of phases in support of the objective outlined above. These work packages are consistent with industry-wide implementation strategies and plans for asset management. A brief description has been provided for each of the phases below. Phase 1 -Gap analysis - To determine the gap between the City's current asset management practices and best practices for all of the City's physical assets. Phase 2 -Review of the GIS/asset inventory component of the Corporate Database - To assess the completeness, currency and accuracy of the inventories, and to develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure the integrity of the asset inventories critical to the ongoing support of the asset accounting process and to asset management. A second component will identify the need for service level agreements (SLA's) for data management between the divisions and Corporate IT as the service provider. This would include a review of the SLA's currently in place and identification of new ones and updates to the existing ones to ensure currency and completeness of asset registers. Phase 3 -Development of customer levels of service -This will include asset specific technical standards and will be an ongoing process for each asset type, as well as customer focused levels of service; major assets would be addressed initially as part of this package with subtypes to be pursued with internal staff over time. The City's assets only exist to deliver services to the community. Phase 4 -The development of long-term asset specific funding projections - To enhance the City's financial sustainability planning using the RIVA modeling tool and documentation of asset management plans. The resolution passed by Council at the February 22, 2010 meeting stated: "THAT the Asset Management Service Delivery Strategy as outlined in staff report FIN-10-026 be supported as the direction for the City of Kitchener's asset management program over the next 3 to 5 years; AND FURTHER THAT the City complete Phase 1 of the Strategy in 2010, being the Asset Management Gap Analysis." As further background information on the City's current asset management best practices, a document entitled "Asset Management Backgrounder" is attached to Report INS 11-029 as Appendix 2. REPORT: The Gap Analysis Methodology and Approach The approach to the gap analysis utilizes the seven element model based on the methodology outlined in the International Infrastructure Manual, Edition 2006. Questions for each of the seven elements were raised in a series of workshops organized by asset type. The self assessment (responses to questions) by the participants was reviewed to identify the strengths and weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement -strategic actions to close the gap between the current and most appropriate best practices. The gap analysis began in June 2010 and was completed in February 2011. 1 (b) - 3 Staff Re~p~r~ ~1ITCH~1`r?E~ ~t?fCQStI'uCture ServrCeS Dep~Cfinen~ w~+w.kitthenerca The seven asset management program elements are described briefly below. 1. Lifecycle processes & practices -These are the processes and practices used by the City in managing its assets -creating, maintaining, and operating its assets and resources to provide the defined service levels. Processes and practices form the basis for all asset management activities within an organization. Without clearly defined and documented procedures, the ability for the organization to execute practices consistently is greatly reduced. These target processes cover the entire lifecycle of the asset. 2. Information systems -Provide the vehicle for the input, storage, organization, analysis, maintenance and retrieval of asset related data. 3. Data and knowledge -The organization's asset data and knowledge about assets forms the basis of every decision made by the organization. The extent, quality, accuracy, availability, and means of storing asset-related data and information dictate the quality and timeliness of the decisions. The asset registry constitutes the heart of all asset management systems. It forms the link between all other asset-related applications and supports the structure by which the information systems analyze and manipulate data. Primary data includes information such as location, valuation and physical attributes; secondary data comprises maintenance history, condition, performance data, failure mode data; higher level data such as advanced-analytics oriented data is used to support optimized decision-making 4. Organizational & people considerations -This element relates to the way organizational factors support asset management and its effective service delivery. Organizational considerations include asset management policy, organization, roles and responsibilities of the sponsor, steering committee and asset managers. The knowledge, skills and attitudes of staff drive an organization to achieve its goals and deliver services. Outcomes (improvements) are, in large part, dependent upon staff. The staff-related considerations include skills and age profiles, attitude and culture, appropriate resources, adequate training and support, and effective management of corporateknowledge, and acceptance of change. 5. Strategic planning comprises the information and tools associated with asset lifecycle planning, costing and renewal strategies. 6. Commercial tactics -Commercial tactics form the basis for the implementation of asset management planning in the field through internal and/or external service providers. Sound commercial tactics are necessary for an organization to drive efficiencies through all aspects of an asset's lifecycle, from conception to disposal. Commercial tactics include the ability to focus on core business activities, gaining efficiencies through effective "packaging" of contracts, good quality contracts and specifications, information and data availability and feedback, and effective contract administration, contractor selection, and contract support systems. 7. Asset management plan -Asset management plans (AMP) incorporate all of the above processes -they are the collation of all asset management practices within an organization and form the basis of the external interface with customers and other stakeholders. Without a robust and substantiated AMP, the Department could fail to fully leverage its resources. 1 (b) - 4 Staff Re~p~r~ ~ITCH~14?E~ lt?fCQStI'uCture Ser~rrCeS ~epaCf~aen~ www.kitthenerca The City's Asset Groups A summary table of the City's asset groups, descriptions and their values based on December 2009 replacement values is shown in Appendix 1 (attached). The City's Asset Owners and Stewards A summary table of the City's assets and their respective owners and stewards is shown in Appendix 3 (attached). Highlights of the Gap Analysis While the gap analysis was focused on major asset groupings, several findings applied to the City of Kitchener as a whole. The first step in the process was the development of corporate business drivers by the stakeholder group, and subsequently business drivers by major asset type. The following corporate business drivers were developed to guide the asset management program: • Public safety and liability • Environmental compliance • Funding constraints • Demand /growth • Economic development /retention of businesses • Balancing expectations & trends • Community and Council priorities • End of life for the asset Strengths -The City has made a number of significant investments that will support the asset management program going forward -the Growth Management Strategy; master plans for transportation (in progress), parks, and the sanitary network; the corporate technology strategic plan; the development of the accelerated infrastructure replacement program (AIRP); the implementation of the Delta project (SAP and Cityworks); the acquisition of RIVA EI (implemented) and RIVA DS (decision support software tools). The establishment of the Office of Asset Management led by the Director of Asset Management is a major step in the process. Weaknesses -Notwithstanding these accomplishments, some of the key elements of sound asset stewardship remain to be put in place -definition and documentation of levels of service, documentation of lifecycles and lifecycle costing for all assets, long term financial forecasting, automation of preventative maintenance schedules, and identification of units of accomplishment to support performance measurement to name a few. There are many gaps in the City's asset inventories and no defined plan as to what they should contain and how they should be maintained. Much remains to be implemented within Cityworks, which is a major tool for asset management. These gaps and others provide the basis for the improvement projects. 1(b)-5 Staff Re~p~r~ ~ITCH~14?E~ lt?fCQStI'uCture Ser~rrCeS ~epaCf~aen~ www.kitthenerca Key Strategic Issues Key strategic issues identified during the review include: • operating budgets are falling significantly behind due to the growth of infrastructure • capital budgets are falling behind for funding the lifecycle replacement of infrastructure • levels of service and units of accomplishment critical to measuring performance and managing costs are not tracked • further leveraging of technology requires both business and technical resources; there are no budgeted funds for expanding SAP or CityWorks, both asset management specific tools. GIS is also an Asset Management tool and is potentially under-resourced to support the growing needs • data is a critical element to managing all types of infrastructure and requires more structure and discipline to properly manage and leverage this costly investment • there are a number of strategic forums that need to interact with asset management - IT, business planning, project portfolio management, various technology steering committees • more SAP training and support is required to support fiscal management Importance of CityWorks as an AM Tool The City uses a wide variety of systems to support their current Asset Management activities. The current asset management system is a combination of technologies, data and processes which work together to support the AM practice. It includes CityWorks, the GIS, SAP and RIVA (as well as fleet and other dedicated solutions). CityWorks is the corporately endorsed work management solution. In combination with the GIS, CityWorks maintains the core asset inventories, tracks service requests and work orders against assets and will be used to record condition data. CityWorks is central to the asset management technology toolbox. Improvement Projects Improvement projects have been divided into two categories -foundation projects and asset specific projects which align with specific programs/ divisions. The foundation projects comprise work that should be completed before the asset owners and stewards begin their tasks. They are common to most of the assets and require preparatory work to set standards and develop templates to make the work of the divisions easier. Whether it is the development of data management plans or defining levels of service, it is important set out the standard content and approach to ensure consistency on a corporate basis. Sixteen (16) major foundation projects have been identified and are described in detail within the Gap Analysis Report. In addition, numerous asset specific projects in support of processes and practices have also been noted. 1 (b) - 6 Staff Re~p~r~ ~ITCH~14?E~ lt?fCQStI'uCture Ser~rrCeS ~epaCf~aen~ www.kitthenerca Next Steps Currently under way: • Documentation of the governance model and development of an Asset Management Policy setting out the priority elements of Asset Management for the City • Development of the CityWorks Vision. CityWorks, the city's work management system, is a major tool for asset management and is the corporate asset registry for all of the city's infrastructure assets (undertaken through IT). • Development of the CityWorks Inspection Strategy. This is an enhancement to the CityWorks system which will facilitate the development of preventive maintenance strategies for a wide range of assets (undertaken through IT). • Development of the CityWorks Maturity Matrix. This is an assessment of current usage of the CityWorks system and will be used to track CityWorks adoption and maturity on an on-going basis. In addition, the maturity assessment will be used to realistically assess the goals or final state for each asset type (undertaken through IT). Work programs to be developed: • Define and document current and future levels of service for each of the city's assets to meet legislated standards and corporate and community goals. • Implement inspections and cyclical work orders for all key asset types to collect and record necessary data. • Continue with on-going enhancements and upgrades to the CityWorks data management system. • Undertake a detailed review of the GIS inventories to lay the groundwork for the development of inter-divisional service level agreements. This will establish an appropriate level of data management for the asset inventories requires to support the PSAB program and the asset management long term plans. • Establish a framework for creating data management plans through the development of an approach for defining data management requirements for each asset type which can be used across all asset types. • Develop a mobile strategy in key asset areas to improve the efficiency and accuracy of data collection and data management. • Develop long range asset management plans, including risk profiles, for all major assets beginning with two pilot projects, namely; pavement and one major building (the Aud). • Implement a policy of full cycle planning and optimized decision making for all major assets (total cost of ownership) to address the operating and maintenance shortfalls due to increased asset portfolios • Revisit and revise the accomplishments and funding for the accelerated infrastructure funding to include storm and potentially gas infrastructure 1 (b) - 7 Staff Re~p~r~ ~1ITCH~1`r?E~ 1lI~CQStrl~fl?'UC~ Se!'VICES D~p(1rf1?1~11~ w~+w.kitthenerca ALIGNMENT WITH CITY OF KITCHENER STRATEGIC PLAN: Work falls within the Efficient and Effective Government plan foundation area of the Strategic Plan. The goal of Asset Management is to develop an asset management program that ensures the availability and sustainability of existing and future assets in response to legislation, corporate goals, the community and growth. The strategic directions are; Affordable Services, Dependable Services, Planned Maintenance and Prioritized Funding. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: The development of two (2) long range detailed asset management plans as pilot projects will begin later this year. The two assets are pavement and bridges and one major building (the Aud). The development of the two pilot projects is estimated at $150,000 which is provided for in the current budget. ACKNOWLEDGED BY: Pauline Houston, Deputy CAO Infrastructure Services (519-741-2646) 1 (b) - 8 Asset Value Distribution (Updated Ap~•i113, 2011) Replacement Value as at December 2009 Asset Group Replacement Value At December 2009 $ Replacement Value Rounded, ~ % of Total Value 1) Water Utilit 149,684,666.58 150,000,000 6 2) Gas Utilit 218,752,081.15 219,000,000 9 3) Wastewater Utilit 183,479,287.81 183,000,000 7.5 4) Stormwater Utili 258,397,462.29 258,000,000 10.5 5) Parlcin~ Enter rise 61,772,616.53 62,000,000 2.5 6) Golfin Enter rise 18,997,420.51 19,000,000 0.5 7) Fleet 57,476,094.97 57,000,000 2 8) Facilities 351,969,678.59 352,000,000 14.5 9) Roads and Traffic 1,076,582,248.95 1,077,000,000 44 10) Parks & O en S ace 44,883,338.02 45,000,000 2 11 Forest 30,000,000.00 30,000,000 1 12) Cemeteries 7,591,783.89 8,000,000 0.5 Total Asset Grou s 2,459,586,679.30 2,460,000,000 100 13) Short Lived Assets (not included in AM 33,126,855.84 14) Land (not included in AM) 910,129,588.72 Total 3,402,843,123.85 Description of Asset Categories 1) Water Utility - main pipes and service pipes - valves - h~ drants - meters 2) Gas Utility - main pipes and service pipes - valves - meters - regulator pits - regulator stations - water heaters (rental) 3) Wastewater (Sanitary) Utility - mails pipes and service pipes - manholes - pumpilig stations & associated stn~cttires 4) Stormwater Utility - pipes - manholes & catchbasins - storm«-ater management ponds - quality control sUuctures and oil & gilt separators - inlet and outlet structures - creels stabilization (not included in the December 2009 inventor-) 1 (b) - 9 5) Parking Enterprise - surface pairing lots & associated infrastructure (lighting, drainage, landscaping) - parking sUuctures & associated infi-asti~ucture (parkilig controls) 6) Golfing Enterprise -golf courses - club houses & contents - storage & maintenance structures - golf carts - specialized equipment solel~T used b~-~ the golf courses 7) Fleet - vehicles - radios - specialized tools 8) Facilities - Cite Hakl, Operations and Maintenance acid Storage buildings - Legion (Ontario St), 44 Gaukel, 20 David St - Kitchener Market - Fire Stations - Auditorium. Arenas and Community- Centres - Centre in the Square, Libraries and Museums -the above, INCLUDES furniture and kitchen equipment - the above. EXCLUDES audio visual equipment, computers. printshop, servers and telephone 9) Roads and Traffic - roads and sidewalks - bridges and culverts - traffic systems (signs, signals, markings, street lights) 10) Parks and Open Space - sportsfields and play grounds - pedestrian bridges - pathwa~rs & trails ll) Forestay - street trees, natural areas and related landscaping features on public land 12) Cemetaries - road s~-stems and related infrastructure - stn~ctures (mausoleum and storage) - fencing 13) Short Lived Assets - Computer Soft~yare $26,874,868.00 - Computer Hardware $ 4,997,~34.ll - Telephones $ 619,246.14 - Printshop & Audio Visual $ 63,207.>9 $33,126,8~~.84 i fib) - io January 21, 2011 ASSET MANAGEMENT BACKGROUNDER CITY OF KITCHENER Infrastructure is the conduit for providing services to the public. During the last 100 years, the City of Kitchener has invested in and acquired some $2.SB worth of infrastructure. The value is based on 2009 replacement dollars. The areas of investment include: • Water Utility • Gas Utility • Wastewater (Sanitary) Utility • Stormwater Utility • Parking Enterprise (parking lots & parking stn~ctures) • Golfing Enterprise (golf courses & club houses ) • Fleet • Facilities (civic, maintenance, fire, community centres, arenas, museums • Roads (pavement, sidewallc, bridges, culverts, traffic signs, lighting ) • Parks (sportsfields, playgrounds, pedestrian bridges, pathways, trails ) • Forestry (street trees, natural areas, active parldand ) • Cemetaries The challenge for Kitchener is to continue to acquire assets as the city grows, to upgrade these assets to keep pace with technology and changes in legislation, to replace these assets due to deterioration and most importantly to meet the levels of service expected by the community on a continuous basis. Over the past three years, the City of Kitchener has laid the foundations for the establishment of an advanced asset management program. The earliest effort focused on the development of the major asset inventories in the City's Corporate Database and the establishment of an Accelerated Infrastn~cture Fund for the replacement of roads, water, and sanitary infrastnicture which has the goal of ensuring that all infrastnicture is under 80 years of age by 2032. These initiatives were supported by a wide range of best practices already ingrained in the organization. The introduction of the new accounting standard, PSAB 3150 (Tangible Capital Assets) requiring all municipalities to develop and value their asset inventories at historic cost, was a catalyst for the City to replace aging corporate systems with leading edge solutions. The completion of the Delta Project in December, 2008 was heralded as the successful implementation of two systems, Cityworks and SAP, and indeed it was a sigiuficant achievement. 1(b)-11 In 2009, the City tools the first step in the implementation of an advanced asset management program by commissioning the development of the Asset Management (AM) Service Delivery Strategy. The strategy set out four phases of activity. The first phase of activity, which is currently being completed, is the the Asset Management Gap Analysis. This phase provides a framework with a view to how well the City is performing in terms of best practices, identifies the strengths and wealaiesses of the current situation and identifies opportunities for improvement. The first step in the process was the development of corporate business drivers to identify those elements that impact the management of our assets, namely; • Public safety and liability • Environmental compliance • Funding constraints • Demand /growth • Economic development /retention of businesses • Balancing expectations & trends • Community and Council priorities • End of life for the asset The Gap Analysis process has highlighted some best practices which are already entrenched in the City of Kitchener. These best practices already in place represent a good start in the development of an overall Asset Management Program. Capital investment and resources will be required to fully develop the program within the next 5- yeartime frame. The best practices have been summarized witlun a number of specific categories. Demand Analysis The City has undertaken several Environics surveys to determine the community's priorities and satisfaction levels. This information provides Council and staff with guidelines for developing affordable and sustainable levels of service. For example, there may be general satisfaction with the quality of the roads in which case the roads program may not need to be adjusted. At the same time there maybe concerns expressed about the timeliness and quality of snow clearing or leaf collecting. This would trigger an examination of the current practices in light of legislative requirements and fielding ability. The levels of service requested by the community and sometimes established by other legislation will have a direct impact on the funding levels required to deliver the service. The City has also completed or is currently undertaking a Growth Management Strategy, a Transportation Master Plan, a Sanitary Network Master Plan, and a Parks Master Plan. These master plans provide projections of the number of assets that the city will acquire as it grows. This information is critical in developing aforward-looping approach to asset sustainability that comprises operations, maintenance, administration, rehabilitation and eventual replacement of the asset. z 1(b)-12 Knowledge of Assets Inventories and condition data exist for many of the assets/infrastn~cture such as pavement, bridges, water, gas, culverts, salutary sewers, storm sewers and trees. Tlus forms the basis of developing the lifecycle program and subsequent funding requirements for assets. Strategic Planiung The City has a Corporate Commuiuty Strategic Plan, a People Plan, an Asset Management Service Delivery Strategy, an Accelerated k7frastructure Funding program and a recently completed Corporate Technology Strategic Plan. The benefit of having completed these plans and programs is the ability to develop acorporate/community vision complete with tasks and timelines. This information feeds into the development of an affordable and sustainable asset management plan. Capital Plamung and Lifecycle Analysis The City has a 10 year capital plan for all physical infrastn~cture such as fleet, sewers, watermains, gas mains, roads, sidewalks, and buildings and their components. The capital budget provides the means for asset maintenance or replacement. Lifecycle planning is in place for pavement, bridges, salutary sewers and watermains. This assists in prioritizing the allocation of funding for the physical assets. A methodology to balance priorities for infrastn~cture finding using condition data has been developed. Accounting and Costing Historical and replacement valuations are complete for assets as of December 2009. The replacement valuations are an important component for the development of annual funding levels to ensure the sustainability of the city's current and future assets. Maintenance and Operations Standard Operating Procedures have been documented for water. Preventive maintenance schedules are documented and tracked. These processes assist in carrying out effective and planned maintenance and replacement of assets to ensure that they achieve their planned lifecycle while delivering the expected level of service. Continuous Improvement The orgaiuzation generally has a positive perspective towards change and continuous improvement. This is a significant benefit for the community since city staff are always looking for ways to do their work better and more effectively. In the long term, the community is the recipient of increased value for their tax dollars. People and Or~aiuzation Engineering Services has dedicated staff worl~ing on asset management initiatives. The City has an Asset Management Program director. The development of an asset management plan for each group of assets is a long term commitment that will require dedicated resources (staff). When the current replacement value of the city's assets (some $2.SB) is considered, the importance of these plans 1(b)-13 becomes apparent since it will impact the long term tax levels and levels of service experienced by the community. Conclusion The City of Kitchener is currently completing the first phase of the Asset Management Service Delivery Strategy, namely the Gap Analysis. The objective of the Gap Analysis was to identify how well the City is performing in terms of best practices and to identify opportunities for improvement. While the City has already implemented some best practices, there are numerous areas of improvement. In general, all assets and related asset programs will require the documentation of current and future levels of service, associating the cost of maintaining the asset to a defined technical standard or community expectation. The City's goal is to develop an asset management program that ensures the availability and sustainability of existing and future assets in response to legislation, corporate goals, the community and growth. The City's directions include: • Linking the operating and capital funding levels to the required levels of service for each asset type with a view to providing the flexibility to respond to changing conditions and managing risk. • Setting priorities for asset rehabilitation and replacement based on a combination of the business risk exposure and appropriate lifecycle treatment strategies. • Developing advanced asset management plans comprising long range funding requirements for both the existing and future assets. • Linking the Asset Management Plans to the City's Strategic Direction for Financial Management The sustainable management of our assets to meet required and expected levels of service is and will be a significant challenge for all municipalities. HNG 4 1(b)-14 ASSET MANAGEMENT -PHASE 1 GAP ANALYSIS ASSET OWNERS & STEWARDS ASSET TYPE ASSET OWNER ASSET STEWARD S (p) primary (s) secondary 1) Water Utility Wally Malcolm • Angela Mick (p) • Greg McTaggart (s) 2) Gas Utility Wally Malcolm • Les Jones (p) 3) Wastewater (Sanitary) Grant Murphy • Greg McTaggart - Utility network (p) • Dan Locke - unl In 7 S steals 4) Stormwater Utility Grant Murphy • Nick Golan (p) • Gre McTa~~art (s) 5) Parking Enterprise John McBride • John McBride - structures (p) • Tony Konstantaiudis - surface ( ) 6) Golfing Enterprise Keith Baulk • 7) Fleet Don Miller • Mike Born (p) • Debbie Boshart - fire a arat<is ( ) 8) Facilities Cynthia Fletcher • Doug Hergott (p) • Kim Kugler (s) 9) Roads & Traffic Grant Murphy • Greg McTaggart - roads (p) • John McBride - traffic ( ) 10) Parks & Open Space Jim Witmer • Greg Hummel (p) 11) Forestry Jim Witmer • Dave Schmitt (p) 12) Cemetaries Keith Baulk • Lorelei Eckel-Braun ~) Prepared November 16, 2010 Rev 1 -Nov 17, 2010 1(b)-15