HomeMy WebLinkAboutCSD-11-046 - Regional Graffiti Strategy Update~~~..~L 1~~ ~~1~~ G~~f~~~~~~ ~f L~~~ WWW.II~i~~~~~r.~~
REPORT T0: Community and Infrastructure Services Committee ,
DATE OF MEETING: June 20, 2011
SUBMITTED BY: Jeff Willmer, Deputy CAO, Community Services, Ext. 2325
PREPARED BY: Shayne Turner, Director of By-law Enforcement, Ext. 2753 ~
WARD(S) INVOLVED: All
DATE OF REPORT: June 8, 2011
REPORT NO.: CSD-11-046
SUBJECT: UPDATE -REGIONAL GRAFFITI STRATEGY
RECOMMENDATION:
For Information
BACKGROUND:
On April 26, 2010, staff presented Report No. CRPS-10-044 (copy attached) outlining the initial
phase of a Waterloo Region Graffiti Strategy. Since that date the working group, now known as
the Waterloo Region Anti-Graffiti Alliance, has developed a number of initiatives aimed at a
public information launch to build awareness beginning this month. This report will serve as an
update on the current status of the Strategy as well as outlining next steps.
REPORT:
During the initial development of the strategy a series of brainstorming sessions were held,
involving a large number of stakeholders, as identified in the attached Strategy document that
was presented to Council in April of last year. Since that time, a core working group consisting
of staff from the cities of Kitchener, Waterloo and Cambridge, Waterloo Regional Police Service
and the Kitchener Downtown BIA have been working with staff from the Waterloo Region Crime
Prevention Council to develop a public education plan to raise awareness of the impact of
graffiti on our communities and to encourage community involvement in reporting and removing
graffiti.
9-1
1
Staff Report
Krr~.~-~~,i~iER CommunityServicesDepartment www.kitthenerta
The fundamental goal of the strategy is to Build awareness and reduce the incidents of graffiti
throughout Waterloo Region by engaging our entire community in amulti-level and multi-
disciplined approach to graffiti reduction. More simply put, the goal is to prevent graffiti from
occurring in the first place and facilitating quick removal to help prevent reoccurrences. A
fundamental element of graffiti reduction is the concept of the "broken window theory", in that
the sooner graffiti is removed from an area, the less likely it will be that more graffiti will appear
in that same area.
Early on, it was recognized that a graffiti removal strategy must include the right balance of
education, empowerment and enforcement. On this basis, the key messaging to the community
is comprised of 3 components:
Recognize It -understand that graffiti is vandalism and the negative impacts of it,
including perceptions of safety and costs to the community;
Re ort It -encouraging the community to report incidents of graffiti, which will assist
City staff in arranging for timely removal and the Police Service in tracking and
investigating graffiti as a crime;
Remove It -encouraging private property owners to remove graffiti from their
properties as soon as possible in efforts to reduce incidents of reoccurrence, and the
community as a whole to get involved by way of neighbourhood cleanups.
The following is a list of the key initiatives, completed or underway, forming the overall strategy:
- The development of visuals, including posters, that will stress a consistent message
throughout the region;
- The implementation of a toll-free phone number for anyone to report incidents of
graffiti anywhere in the region. The phone number is 1-855-TAG-FREE (824-3733);
- The development of a shared website (www.wipeoutgraffiti.ca) to promote the
strategy as well as provide a further mechanism to report incidents;
- The development of mural projects at locations where graffiti has been identified as a
significant challenge. In this regard, a mural project on a retaining wall for a Hydro
sub-station in the area of Morgan Avenue is nearing completion;
- The 3 cities have reviewed and refined their respective graffiti removal enforcement
processes to be more consistent with each other;
- An enhanced relationship with utilities/agencies to better address graffiti removal
from their "street furniture" situated within the municipal road allowances (ie. postal,
hydro or cable boxes and traffic signal boxes);
- The development of an anti-graffiti education message aimed at youth, starting with
education delivered at the Children's Safety Village;
9-2
1
Staff Report
Krr~.~-~~,i~iER CommunityServicesDepartment www.kitthenerta
The development of a process to encourage community cleanups, including the
provision of "graffiti cleanup kits" to be provided to neighbourhood groups for their
planned events.
A series of information pieces are currently under development by City staff to deliver the anti-
graffiti messaging throughout Kitchener, starting with the recently released May/June edition of
Your Kitchener. Similar efforts are underway in the other municipalities.
Specifically with regard to the removal enforcement process within the City of Kitchener, the
staff report in April of last year resulted in the development of a stand alone graffiti by-law. Prior
to the enactment of the new by-law, graffiti removal was addressed as a provision in the more
comprehensive Property Standards By-law. The issue identified by staff was the legislated
process for property standards enforcement (ie. prescribed timelines for compliance and the
appeal process) could present challenges with regard to encouraging quick removal. The new
by-law provides staff with more flexibility to work with property owners, in requiring graffiti
removal, while at the same time allowing them to initiate removal very quickly when the
circumstances warrant such action.
It is important to understand that this strategy is still evolving and the working group will
continue to collaborate with the community and other stakeholders to enhance current initiatives
and develop new ideas.
Staff are available to work with members of Council with regard to any efforts to deliver the
messaging and encourage graffiti cleanups within their respective Wards.
ALIGNMENT WITH CITY OF KITCHENER STRATEGIC PLAN:
The City's participation in the Regional Graffiti Strategy supports the City's Community Priorities
of Quality of Life and Leadership and Engagement, as outlined in the City's Strategic Plan.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
To date, the costs relating to the printing of posters and establishing the reporting phone
number has been minimal (less than $800). This cost will be covered by existing operating
budgets. Going forward, the annual cost for the City of Kitchener's share of maintaining the
reporting phone number will be dependant upon the number of phone calls made to it. Staff will
monitor the costs associated with the phone line over time, however early estimates indicate a
cost not exceeding $500 annually.
9-3
1
Staff Report
Krr~.~-~~,i~iER CommunityServicesDepartment www.kitthenerta
Costs relating to future initiatives will be scrutinized in terms of existing operating budgets where
possible. In the event that costs are identified that cannot be absorbed within current operating
budgets, staff will present proposals to Council where appropriate.
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT:
As identified in the attached Strategy document, many stakeholder groups, including
neighbourhood representatives, were involved in the initial brainstorming sessions. The
stakeholders will continue to be involved in discussions regarding opportunities to advance
existing initiatives and the development of future action items. In addition, several presentations
have been made to groups such as KYAC, the Waterloo Region Police Services Board and the
Waterloo Region Crime Prevention Council. Future presentations will be made to various
neighbourhood associations.
ACKNOWLEDGED BY: Jeff Willmer, Deputy CAO, Community Services Department
Encl.
9-4
J
c~~R
CorporQte Services
REPORT T0: Finance and Corporate Services Committee
DATE OF MEETING: April 26, 2010
SUBMITTED BY: Troy Speck, General Manager of Corporate Services
PREPARED BY: Shayne Turner, Director of By-law Enforcement
WARD(S) INVOLVED: All
DATE OF REPORT: April 19, 2010
REPORT NO.: CRPS-10-044
SUBJECT: GRAFFITI STRATEGY -UPDATE
RECOMMENDATION:
That the UUaterloo Region Graffiti Strategy update as contained in Report No. CRPS-10-044 be
received for information; and further,
That a by-law be enacted to regulate the placing of graffiti and the removal of graffiti from
property.
BACKGROUND:
The Graffiti Strategy Committee was formed in 2009 and has developed a draft action plan
which is attached to this report.
One of the action items relates to developing appropriate tools to assist enforcement staff with
facilitating quicker removal of graffiti. This report discusses the option of a graffiti removal by-
I aw.
REPORT:
The attached report, which is still under development, provides an overview of the process
followed to date and the various stakeholders who have participated. It also outlines the key
areas of focus (themes) within the strategy. It is important to note that the action plan
represents those items that are under consideration and being explored at this time. It is
9-5
considered to be a "living" document that is subject to change from time to time as the status of
action items evolve, are removed because they have been completed or are found not to be
feasible, or as new ideas come forward for exploration.
During the process and development of the action plan, it was identified that municipalities
within the Region deal with graffiti removal in a variety of ways. As a result, one of the action
items created relates to looking at how the enforcement process may be streamlined to be
consistent within the 3 cities as well as more flexible and efficient.
Of note is the fact that the City of Cambridge has developed a stand alone graffiti removal by-
law, whereas the Kitchener and Waterloo deal with graffiti removal by way of a provision in our
larger Property Standards By-law. As such, Kitchener and Waterloo enforcement staff have met
to discuss the feasibility of a by-law that would deal with graffiti in a manner similar to
Cambridge.
As mentioned, Kitchener's By-law Enforcement staff deal with graffiti, taking action to require its
removal, using a provision in the Property Standards By-law (Chapter 665 of the Municipal
Code). Although the removal provision in the By-law is enforceable, staff are of the opinion that
the process can be improved to allow staff more flexibility. The property standards enforcement
process is governed by the Building Code Act and includes certain requirements that can impact
the timelines related to having graffiti removed. In addition, there is a formal process to appeal
the timelines to comply as specified in the orders.
Staff are proposing the development of a stand alone graffiti removal by-law to replace the
current property standards provisions they are enforcing. The proposed by-law is authorized
under the provisions of the Municipal Act, 2001, that enables municipalities to deal with
nuisance issues. The proposed by-law will allow staff to be more flexible in terms of the
timelines given to property owners to comply. In addition, staff can work with the property
owners and provide some latitude in terms of compliance requirements outside of the formal
appeal process in property standards enforcement.
The by-law will also contain a provision that will allow the City to enter on to the property to
clean up the graffiti if the owner fails to do so. All associated costs can be added to the tax roll
of the subject property.
A draft by-law is currently under development by By-law Enforcement staff in conjunction with
Legal Services and, subject to Council's direction, will be presented for enactment at a future
Council meeting.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
None identified at this time.
9-6
COMMUNICATIONS:
No Corporate Communications required.
CONCLUSION:
The Waterloo Region Graffiti Strategy Committee has developed an action plan to address the
issue of graffiti in a variety of ways. The action plan identifies the process of enforcing graffiti
removal as one that can be improved.
Staff believe the proposed stand alone graffiti removal by-law, which will replace the current
process using the property standards process, will give staff more flexibility to require quicker
removal as well as options to work with the property owner to facilitate graffiti removal.
ACKNOWLEDGED BY: Troy Speck, General Manager of Corporate Services
Encl.
9-7
Waterloo Region
Anti-Graffiti Alliance
A report on the initiatives being undertaken
to reduce incidents of graffiti throughout
Waterloo Region
June 2011
9-8
Goal:
Build awareness and reduce the incidents of graffiti throughout Waterloo Region by
engaging our entire community in amulti-level and multi-disciplined approach to graffiti
reduction.
Introduction:
The presence of graffiti has a large and widespread negative impact within a
community. These adverse impacts relate to the perceptions of crime and safety,
aesthetics and the local economy. In addition, municipalities, public agencies and
institutions, enforcement agencies, business and private property owners, spend
considerable time and financial resources with regard to their individual efforts to
combat graffiti. There are few people in a community that will not, atone time or
another, be affected by the presence of graffiti to some extent.
The Waterloo Region Crime Prevention Council published their Fear of Crime:
Perceptions in Waterloo Region report in November of 2009. The report helpsto
provide some context with our Region. In this report, graffiti was identified as one of
the "crimes of concern",and ranked 7t"amongthe identified crimes in terms of level of
concern, according to a 2008 citizen survey.
(Need to include foot note acknowledgement of report)
Background:
In 2009, a small coregroupof municipalitiesand agencieswithinWaterloo Region began
to brainstorm ways to combat graffiti. It became clear early in the discussions that a
coordinated and collaborative approach would be the optimal way todevelop anAnti-
Graffiti Strategy. The strategy, involved identifying all relevant stakeholders in the
region to implement anti-graffiti initiatives. An attempt is being made to move from
individual to collective actions.
A largegroup of stakeholders were brought together to brainstorm and begin the
development of ananti-graffiti strategy. The discussions were fruitful and the
stakeholder group identified a wide variety of issues associated with graffiti and ways to
combat it. All of the input was categorized into four major themes. Embedded
throughout the themes are the guidingprinciples of the4 E's, consistentwithstrategies
and initiatives developed in other jurisdictions. The 4 E's are:
Education, Empowerment, Eradication and Enforcement.
9-9
It is anticipated that the Anti-Graffiti Strategy will continue to be a dynamic document
whereby various initiativesand action items will be discussed, implemented and
evaluated over time. Certain existing initiatives once completed may be removed from
the action list and new initiatives added as they are identified as being relevant and
feasible within the region.
Themes:
The stakeholders have agreed to advancethegraffiti strategyalongfourthemes,
identified as:
Prevention and Enforcement
Develop initiatives aimed at deterrence and consistent by-law regulations relating to
early removal.
Community En~a~ement
Getting people engaged in initiatives to prevent and reduce graffiti within their
communities.
Public Awareness and Education
Raise awareness within the community as to the impact of graffiti and ways to combat
it.
Puhlic Art
Develop public art projects in identified areas of the region as a way to deter graffiti.
Initiatives:
Appendix A outlines the various anti-graffiti initiatives that currently make up our Anti-
Graffiti Strategy. The initiatives are categorized according to the applicable theme as
described previously.
9-10
Stakeholders:
The following stakeholders have been involved in the development and implementation
of the initiatives identified in the Anti-Graffiti Strategy.
Region of Waterloo Waterloo Crime Prevention Council
Waterloo Regional Police Service Downtown East You Gotta Luv it Project
Kitchener Downtown BIA Waterloo Uptown BIA
City of Kitchener John Howard Society
City of Cambridge ROOF
City of Waterloo Canada Post
Township of Wellesley Button Factory
Township of Wilmot Cambridge, Waterloo, Kitchener BIA'S
Township of North Dumfries Bell Canada
KW- Hydro Wilfred Laurier Police
University of Waterloo Police Community Justice Initiatives
Grand River Conservation Authority Waterloo Region District School Board
Waterloo Catholic District School Board Conestoga College
Crown Attorney's Office Grand River Transit
KW Real Estate Board Community Members and Community
Centre Coordinators and Volunteers
9-11
N
,~
D
0
a--+
U
a
L
~--~
•~
•~
(L
V
0
._
0
L
a--+
f~
O
N
Q ~
X ~
~ ~
C ~
N ~
Q ~
Q c~
Q ~
Q
N - U '~ N
~ ~
~ ~
~ c
~ ~ ° o
a °
~ '
3 v
° ?' s
}' ° +~ ~ ~
~ ° a~ v ~
c~
N
>
v
'3 u
v ~
o~o•~ ~ ~
0~ ~
~ >
~
~
~ m ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ Q
. r~ s
Q ~ ~
Q f~ ~
~ ~
° ~
~ O
v O L ~
` ° ~ ~ U
~
N ~~
• ~
}+ ~
v ~
~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L
~~ a ~ 3 ~ ~3
~ ~~ ~
~ ~ ~
~
~ > a,o ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~
a ~ o m ~
o ~n
~ ~
v
00 ~ °
3 o a
Z
~ c~
s ~ L
o
v ° ,
+~ ~
~ 00
~, ~, ~, o z
~ ~o
~ ~, U x
v s
ago
3
+~ 'v 0
s ~
N ~ ~
CaA N
D ~
~ 0 ~ i 0
}' ~ `~ 3
+~ ~ ~
N
~ ~
0 ~ 0
L
~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ _ ~
3 -Q~~ ~ ~ L v s
cn o~
U ~
~ ~ °
~ a,o L ~a~a~~ ~ _~ ~ - ~
L ~"~
Q
~ ~
° Q) °
~ ~ ~ C N ~
~ ~ L ~ (~ ~
~
` U
~ ~ QJ
~
~ 0
~ aA
~ 0
N 0
~ ~ b~A
~ ~
C }' ~ to +~
~ U ~ _
~
U Q ~
~ 0 0
'
Y
~~ s v ~ ~, ~~ v 3
~ ~ ~ ~ o
~~ ~v o ~ ~ ~~~o ~~ > ~ s
0~ ~ ~~ ~
0 Q ~ s .
a.., Q O ~ ~ ~L
*~ L f0
~~
~
~
~
~
a ~,
~
o r~
°'°
~ ~
°J
o v
o .
>
U~ m ~
U ._ ~
U- U U ~ ~
~ N u N o
U~ a u ra
L
QJ O L ~ QJ O
._
N
._ Q
aJ N
OJ
i
°
0
~
aJ
~ N
~
~
1 ~ ~
O LL
r 5
L
~
~ L ~
~ ~ Q~ ~
_ _ ~ ~ ~
Q Q ~ m ~
~
~
~
f0 .U .u ~
f0 ~/j ~ iJ
~ ~ ~
~
~ -
Q 0
~ U N
U
0
s
~ ~
+~ v ~ ~
~ C~0 tu0
'
' ~ 0
~
0
s +~
~ ~
v .L
u ~
~
v v
o~ L ~
~ U
3 ~ ~
a
~
L=
~
~ ~ ~-
~ v
_ s
' o a~
m
o
v
~,
`~ ~
~
*~
'v 0 >
N Q -
~
~ ~
~ v ~ . " o
L
U
~ •- N C ~
w ~ _ Q
c ~~ ~ L ~
L 3~, c ~
~ ~ 01 0
u Q 0
s ~ ° ~
0 ~ ~
±.' ~
O ~ ~ ~ 0 ~,
(~ aL ~ DJ
~
DJ
~ ~ L
O ~
V ~
•~ L
_
~
Q
~
~
~
~ ~
~u Q 0
~ 0
s
3 ~
~ ~
Q
~
~ ~
~'
~ 0
~ ~
O
~°~ ~
*~ ~
o ~, ~
~~' r~
a V
~
°X
~ °'
a~
~~
~ s ° ' Q~
~ ~ ~ s ~
~
O
~
~
~ c
~ ~
~
c
O
QJ .
~ +~
aA i ~
~ s
i
~
Q•~ ~
~ ~ ~ L
aa a w~a U w
~ ~
0
._ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ j ~ i ~ 3 ~
~ i ~ ~ ~ ~
a W
0 ~
U w
M
,~
D
o ~;
~;
~ ~
v ~
L
o ~
~ a-•+ ~ v
v
) c~ ~ ~
~
t! ~
' ~ O
U ~ U
U ~ V
~ ~ 3
~ ~
~ v
}
~ 3 v O
.~
0
c ~ ~ Q j, 0 v 'v
, ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ .
~ ~
u ~ ~
a ~ ~ °
w ~ ~ ~
>,
_~ ~
~ L
v
~
t/1 ~
~ L ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t/1 ' L
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
~..r (
]
`r ~
Q~ ~ ~
o
.
O ~ v v
U O U ~ ~
f0 ~ +•+ - f0 ~ C
~3 ~~ fB
~ L ~°v ~
o~
0 ~ ~~ > ~ o
0 ~ ~ _~ 0
~ 0 L ~ ~ +~ GA ~ v~ ~ L
~ a 00
0 ~ ~ _
L
v v
L Q ~ 0
`~
' ~ ~
~ L 0
`~ ~ +~ ~
v ~
~ ~
~~ ~~
~ >
v -
o ~
o~
v v~ a~ oQ s~
+~ ~ ~
+~
o =~
' ~,
v °~ ~ ~
r~ +~ ~ ~,
~ Y v ~
+_+ a L ~ ~ '+~ 0 U 0 L _ •~ v ~
~~ ~ o v ~
3 u ~~
' ~ o ~ o~
~ r~ o ~
~~
0O ~ ~v
~'~ L
~
~ ~~o
~+~ ~~,
L v
3 ~
v o
~'s o ~~
cQ
~ v ~ ~ ~
~ ._ ~ c
~ ~ ~ ~
o v ~ ~
~, o
, ~ c
o ~ ~
s ~
L v •~
~ .
0 L
~ ~ 0~
O ~ v
v O u v
~ p~ c~ p
~ ~
~ p '~A
0 +~ ~ 0
~ C
~~
~° u
~ v
L v ~ 3 U~ ~
L0 3 ~ v
s L v s
L CaA ~ O
v~ L ~~ v o oo~ ~v o +~v
` s'v o v>.
ZoC Q U~ Z U 2aU ~Z ~ ~~ ~n ~ U oC~
~ aA aA ~A
~ ~ ~ ~
O
N 0 0 0 ~
~ ~
~
~ ~ ~ ~ O O
~ i ~ i ~ i ~ i ~ ~
O L
O
L
O L
0 _
'L _
'L
c~ s v s v ~ v ~ ~ a
m
~
L •°-
~ ~ o
'
0 0 v ~ u +~
~ ~ °
~ ~ ~ v .~ ~ cn _o ~
~~ v v
~ (6 ~ v ~ (~ L p~
0
• L ~ Q
a
~
a
~
Q ~
v ~
~ ~ a
oc ~ ~ v
~~
~c~ ~
c~ ~
o
o
~U +~
U~
m
~
m L
~
~ o
~~aoc
~ o
Ut~ _
Q
a~ a~ o ~
' ~ ~
~ o o
° ~ ~;
~ ~,
~ o a,o
c
~
~0
~ L
~~ ~
~'
re
~
v
~ _
a~L
~o
~
~ ~
~
v ~ o
•Q ~ o
~
~ ~~
+~ r~ 3
~ L
~ o
~ a
o
L ~
aA CaA o
+~ +~
~ ~ o~
Q o
~
v +~
~ ~ v
L
to
Q ~ ,~ 0 v ~
L ~
v L ~' CaA ~ ~' v
`~
c~ _
a,o
• 3
v
L ~
~ ~ a~ L~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ •-
v ~
_
•
L ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
3 ~..~ ~
(/~
~ v
~ ~v
~
• ~7L
f0 o
~ 3 +~ m
L
+, v
U v
L
~ O
~ ~ ~ O
~ U
0
~A ~ ~ v c~ ~ N r~ p ~ ca ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v v
o v 3 •-~ v> ~, > ~t7
v L~ ~ v ~
a ° ~ r~~ ~ o0 o .c ~.~~ ai0~ ~ ~ ~o
~ L ~ ~ ~ (6 ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~
~
~ 0 f0
~ 3 ~ v ~ a,o ~ o c v ~
>
+•+ L ~ `~
~ - v .~ ~ +~
cn
~
~
+ v ~
}'
Q ~'
r~ ~
v ~
, ~ ~ N v 0 ~ v ~ ~
~ ~ o ~~ ~ a~ ~ v ~~~ ~~ 3 ~ a~~
X
o •N
~ Q
~ O 0
L
~ ~
o v ~A
s~ u
~ L
~ }' 0
~' a
3 ~~
o ~ ~
0 •cn 0
m ~
cn ~ v ~ w ~ v c~
~
~
~
( ~
a~ u, w ~ ~ c~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ c
~ c
~
(~
"
~ (~
C6 ~
~ ~ ~
~ CaA
~ °
~ ~ S
(~ q,p U U O
~ ~"
a..+ ~
v L i
0
O ~
(/~ v 0
~ CaA v
0 ~ L
v qp . _
~ ~ ~
~ ~
~
Q of l]A
~ v > 0
v ~ Q
~ U v > Q
~
Q w ~ U O Q w .~ a Q ~ Q l~A OC D .~ L Q ~ 2 L
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~-
~
u
- v
~
'
~ U
3~
a Q w
D
0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
. f0 ~ ~ of ~
U ~ ~ ~ ~ v °
~ ~ ~ I ~ Q Q
~
0 _
V
~ ~ ~
aA
~
v
~ ~
~ v L
o
v Q ~ v
o ~
`~
v
t7 ~ ~
+~
>
~ > v c
~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ 0 ~
a ~
~
~ 0
Z
~
~ ~
~
3
U v ~ ~ +~+ ~ ~ ~
o
~
~
~
~
v ~
~
- v
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
u ~
+~ L
~v +~
c
~ 0
vv
'~
~
.
•
a~ ~ ~ ~ cs ~ ao c
'V ~
• ~
~ L ~
v ~ ~
~ ~ }'
~,v L cn 0
+~
~~
~ ~ ~
3 ~ ~
~ c~ c~ > v
~ ~ c
~ ~ a '> U > ~ ~ O v a
~
•~ L ~ ~ ~
L
~ ~ L
~
.~ ~ .- ~ L L
.~ Q O v O ~ t]A
~
v v
m t!1 O
N .
H ~ 0
to - 0
~
O
~ ~ ~
v
~
cn +
+
o ~ °'
s Q
m ~ ~
~ ~; Q ~
o •~
• o
v ~ o ~
~ , ~
~ ~ ~ ~ L
5
m Q
0 ~.~i ~ L ~..i v
~ (~ ~
L L
f~
v ~ v ~ ~
~ ~
~
,~ ~ V1 ~ ~
~
~ ~ v
~
~
aA ~ v 0
= `~ U ..
v
~ ~
~
t]A
t/1 • ~ L L L i
a ~ Oo~'v o~ °~
~
~ ~
I U ~ ~ L
~
~ i f0
- -
Q
~ ~
~
0 ~
+~
0~~ ~
j
V Q
+,
c 0
cn
~
~
, ~ Q
L
v ~' a ~
~ .
c
_
to ~~
Q
(!1 v
L ~
~ L oo~~ a 3 ~_
_
. a~
~ ~, ~ c
~ ~
U ~
+•' ~
0 u~ ~
+•+ ~
~
0 Q .
v~ v u
~ +~ ~
~
~
L c~
+~ ~ 0 ~_
~ ~v
~ v O L C t
~, ~ 3
.~ ~ v ~", v o
~
r~ r~
v v~
~~~~ +~
~ s
+~ ~ ~
or~
~~
~ ~ a~ o~ o.~
, v .c v ~ ~ ~
v ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~"~ , 0 L
• V ~> ~ O ~ ~-•~ ~ Q ~ Q Q
v
v L
Q
~V
a
D