Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutINS-11-066 -Traffic Calming Request - Glasgow St Fischer Hallma1 KITCx~i~~R Staff Report ~nfrastru~ture Services Department r.ki~~~~~erca REPORT T0: Community and Infrastructure Services Committee DATE OF MEETING: September 12, 2011 SUBMITTED BY: John McBride, Director of Transportation Planning PREPARED BY: Ken Carmichael, Supervisor of Traffic and Parking 519-741-2372 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 8 DATE OF REPORT: August 23, 2011 REPORT NO.: INS-11-066 SUBJECT: GLASGOW STREET, FISCHER HALLMAN ROAD TO BELMONT AVENUE -TRAFFIC CALMING REQUEST RECOMMENDATION: That a traffic calming review be executed in 2012 for Glasgow Street between Fischer Hallman Road and Belmont Avenue, with recommended measures incorporated into the roadway design for the reconstruction of these sections of roadway in 2013 (Knell Drive to Westmount Road) and 2014 (Westmount Road to Belmont Avenue). BACKGROUND: A resident delegation appeared at Council on Jun 13/11, requesting that Council consider the implementation of traffic calming measures on Glasgow Street between Fischer Hallman Road and Belmont Avenue. Upon consideration of the delegation's request, the following Council resolution was passed: "That a request by area residents to implement traffic calming measures on Glasgow Street from Fischer Hallman Road to Belmont Avenue, be referred to the September 12, 2011 Community & Infrastructure Services Committee meeting, to allow additional information to be presented and a recommendation of staff brought forward to address the issues raised by area residents." This report serves to update the Committee on traffic conditions on Glasgow Street, including staff's recommendation for follow up. REPORT: Roadway Classification The City of Kitchener's first Municipal Plan was established in 1965. This plan did not include classification of the City's roadways. 8-1 1 Staff Re ort p I~t`r~.~-~~,i~iER ~nfrastrurture Servrces Department www.kitthenerta The Municipal Plan was updated in 1979. Through this update, roadway classifications were established for all City of Kitchener roadways. Accordingly, Glasgow Street was designated as a collector roadway. The 1979 Municipal Plan did not differentiate between minor and major collector roadways, as a collector roadway's function was defined as: Collector Road - A route that collects traffic from an area and distributes it to an arterial road. Direct access to abutting properties is permitted. For example, Krug Street, Greenbrook Drive. Glasgow Street between Fischer Hallman Road and Belmont Avenue is designated as a major collector roadway within the City of Kitchener's current Municipal Plan (1994). The function of a major collector roadway is to collect and distribute traffic between local streets, other collector roadways and the arterial road system, as a primary function to carry through traffic between neighbourhoods. The expected traffic volume on major collector roadways is 8,000 to 12,000 vehicles per day. Roadway Reconstruction The history of road reconstruction on Glasgow Street was investigated. Records go back to 1965. Since 1965, the only major construction work on Glasgow Street was between Fischer Hallman Road and Knell Drive in 2000. This reconstruction updated the old, rural road cross- section to an urban cross-section that includes curb and gutter, sidewalks, bicycle lanes and defined, narrowed traffic lanes. Glasgow Street between Knell Drive and Westmount Road is scheduled for reconstruction in 2013, while Glasgow Street between Westmount Road and Belmont Avenue is scheduled for reconstruction in 2014. The reconstruction of roadways can provide an opportunity to incorporate traffic calming measures into the roadway design. Traffic Speed and Volume Analysis Speed and volume studies for Glasgow Street have been conducted at various locations, with additional historical speed and volume studies through the Glasgow Street corridor. Recent, updated studies on Glasgow Street have rendered the following 85t" percentile speed results. I n~atinn Volume (vehs/days Speed (85t" percentile) Glasgow St Westwood Dr to Knell Dr Glasgow St Inwood Dr to Aberdeen Rd 6, 567 6, 659 Glasgow St Avondale Ave to Dunbar Rd 7,898 60 kmlh 54 km/h 52 kmlh These volumes and speeds can be considered typical for major collector roadways and are similar to volumes and speeds previously recorded on Glasgow Street. 8-2 1 Staff Re ort p I~t`r~.~-~~,i~iER ~nfrastrurture Servrces Department www.kitthenerta Further analysis was completed related to the speed of vehicles, comparing Glasgow Street to other major collector roadways. This analysis is summarized below. Table 1 -Glasgow Street Speed Analysis Summary, outlines a breakdown of the incidence of speeds on Glasgow Street in comparison to other major collector roadways. Table 1-Glasgow Street Speed Analysis Summary Speed Speed Speed Location > 60 km/h > 70 km/h > 80 km/h Glasgow St -Westwood Dr to Knell Dr 11.3% 1.8% 0.5% -Inwood Dr to Aberdeen Rd 8.2% 3.5% 1.7% -Avondale Ave to Dunbar Rd 1.5% 0.5% 0.4% Major Collector roadways* 9.2% 1.2% 0.4% * - average of Biehn Drive, Deer Ridge Drive, Doon South Drive, Greenbrook Drive, Lorraine Avenue, Rittenhouse Road This data indicates that the incidence of higher speeds on Glasgow Street, while not desirable, is considered typical for a major collector roadway. Collision Analysis An updated five (5) year collision analysis for the Glasgow Street corridor was completed for the years 2006 through 2010. This analysis excluded the intersections of: -Glasgow Stand Fischer Hallman Road -Glasgow Stand Westmount Road -Glasgow Street and Belmont Avenue. The intersections of Glasgow/Fischer Hallman and GlasgowlWestmountsre under Regional jurisdiction. Any improvements at these intersections would be executed by the Region of Waterloo. The intersection of Glasgow/Belmont has experienced a total of 44 collisions during this five (5) year time period. While a traffic calming review for Glasgow Street would not specifically address this intersection, staff will be executing a separate review of this intersection. A summary of the collision on Glasgow Street is summarized in Figure 1 -Glasgow Street Collision History. 8-3 1 Staff Re ort p I~t`r~.~-~~,i~iER ~nfrastrurture Servrces Department www.kitthenerta A total of 21 collisions occurred on Glasgow Street, excluding the three intersections noted previously, during the 2006-2010 time period. These collisions, spread out through the corridor, indicate no strong patterns in collision occurrence. Figure 1 -Glasgow Street Collision History summarizes the locations of collisions within the Glasgow Street corridor. Figure 1-Glasgow Street Collision History fly- ~~~ ~ lA ~ 5 Year Collision History 2006-2010 Glasgow St (Fischer-Hallman Rd to Belmont Aver ~~~ Total Collisions = 21 ~~ ~~~ «~ is ~ .a ~e~~ ~ - 2 ~~ ", - - ~ ~ ~ 1 ur: ~ ~r ~ +~~~ '~ -~ 3 ~ 3 ~~~t ~ ~ur~t ~~I~ ~ rrd ~ur~t ~ ~I u~ ~~- ~ 6 ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~,. rd ~} a r ~ she - ~ i~ °~r~ _.~-~' ~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~_ ~ ~ 1 ~~~~ _=~ * * ~ ~ * ~ .~ *~ ~*~ ~~* ~ irs • ~ * ~ ~~ ~ * ~ * ~~ ~ ~r ~ ~ _. _~- ~ y,t ~ ~ 5 r ~s - E~r ~ r~°~ w These collisions are summarized on the next page by collision type in Table 2 -Collision Summary. 8-4 1 KITCx~i~~R Staff Report ~nfrastru~ture Services Department r~kit`~~~~erca Table 2-Collision Summary Collision Summa Initial Impact T pe Year Angle ^ TM • Other • Approaching Z Sideswipe ~ Rear end ~ SMV Un • SMV other ~ Total 2010 1 1 4 6 2009 1 3 1 5 2008 2 1 1 1 5 2006 1 1 2 Total 3 3 1 1 1 10 1 1 21 Collision Summa Initial Impact T pe B Year Angle ^ TM • Other • Approaching Z Sideswipe ~ Rear end ~ SMV Un • SMV other Total 2010 5% 5% 19% 29% 2009 5% 14% 5% 24% 2008 10% 5% 5% 5% 24% ~~~ ~, 2006 5% 5% 10% Total 14% 14% 5% 5% 5% 48% 5% 5% 100% This summary indicates that the types of collisions vary significantly, with no clear collision patterns by type or location. Further detailed analysis of collisions would be executed through a more comprehensive traffic calming review for Glasgow Street. All-Way Stop Analysis A number of intersections along Glasgow Street were studied for the possible implementation of an all-way stop control. These intersections include: Glasgow Street at Westwood Drive Glasgow Street at Knell Drive Glasgow Street at Inwood Drive Glasgow Street at Aberdeen Road Glasgow Street at Dunbar Road. For the information of the Committee, as outlined in the Ontario Traffic Manual, all-way stop controls will not be used under the following conditions: 1. Where the protection of pedestrians, school children in particular, is a prime concern. This concern can usually be addressed by other means. 2. As a speed control device. 3. On roadways where progressive signal timing exists. 4. On truck or bus routes, except in an industrial area, or where two such routes cross. 5. Where traffic would be required to stop on grades. 6. As a means of deterring the movement of through traffic in a residential area. 7. Where visibility of the sign is hampered by curves or grades, and insufficient safe stopping distance exists. 8. Where any other traffic device controlling right-of-way is permanently in place within 250 m, with the exception of a Yield sign. 8-5 1 I~TC:~~ivER Staff Report ~nfrastru~ture Services Department w.~i~~~~~er.~~r The implementation of unwarranted all-way stop controls, as studied by the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE), results in the following negative impacts: Safety Problems: • Drivers not obeying the right-of-way at all-way stop intersections. • Drivers not making a complete stop. • Drivers recognize that stop signs are not needed at an intersection and tend to ignore the control resulting in potential safety problems. This has led to a general decrease in compliance with traffic control devices. • Drivers tend to increase speed at mid-block to make up for time lost. Economic Impacts: • Increased delays. • Increased fuel consumption due to increased vehicle stops and acceleration. • Increase in vehicle operating costs. Operational Impacts: • Increased stops and delays. • Increased traffic congestion at an intersection. • Driver anxiety, impatience. • Increase in collisions, under certain circumstances. Environmental Impacts: • Increased noise and air pollution due to an increase in vehicle stops and acceleration. Because of these negative impacts, all-way stop controls will only be implemented at those intersections that meet the minimum warrants for their installation. An analysis of the intersections studied within the Glasgow Street corridor rendered the following results. Glasgow at: Total Intersection Volume (min 500 veh/hr) Minor Roadway Volume (min 200 veh/hr) Collisions (min 3/yr for 3 years) All-Way Stop Warranted 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.33 No No No No No *Note-Total Intersection VolumeAND Minor Roadway Volume must meet minimum warrant OR Collisions must minimum warrantfor an all-way stop to be warranted. Westwood Knell Inwood Aberdeen Dunbar 512 509 538 579 704 -and - 40 26 28 91 78 -or- 8-6 1 Staff Re ort p I~t`r~.~-~~,i~iER ~nfrastrurture Servrces Department www.kitthenerta As indicated, all-way stops are not warranted for any of the five (5) intersections studied through the Glasgow Street corridor and are not recommended for implementation. Traffic Calming Priority Ranking Based on the updated speed and volume studies and collision history, Glasgow Street was compared to other roadways requested for traffic calming. Glasgow Street between Fischer Hallman Road and Westmount Road, previous to this update, was ranked 17t" on our traffic calming priority listing of major collector roadways with 25 points. Incorporating the results of the updated studies, this section of Glasgow Street is now ranked 18t" on this listing with 28 points. Glasgow Street between UUestmount Road and Belmont Avenue was not previously included on our traffic calming priority listing for major collector roadways. Considering the updated studies, it has been determined that this section of Glasgow Street is ranked 8t" on this listing with 38 points. Due to the need to maintain clear emergency response routes through the City, the application of traffic calming measures is limited on major collector roadways. Accordingly, vertical deflections (ie. speed humps, raised crosswalks) cannot be considered due to the negative impact on emergency response times. As a result, typical measures used on major collector roadways to address concerns regarding speeding involve adjustment to the roadway design (roadway narrowings, bump outs, traffic circles, etc). Accordingly, the opportunity presented by the upcoming reconstruction of Glasgow Street will allow for these types of measures to be incorporated into the roadway design. The recommendation for a traffic calming review on Glasgow Street is due to the upcoming reconstruction and is based on the relative position of Glasgow Street in the traffic calming priority ranking. The opportunity provided by the roadway reconstruction allows for traffic calming measures to be incorporated into the roadway design in order to realize cost savings and construct the traffic calming measures in the most effective manner. Additionally, implementing traffic calming measures through a roadway reconstruction will reduce the impact of construction on the local area. It is important to note that none of the roadways in our priority ranking that had a standing on our priority ranking higher than Glasgow Street are scheduled for reconstruction in the near future. Based on these rankings and the opportunity provided through roadway reconstruction, it is recommended to execute a traffic calming review for Glasgow Street between Fischer Hallman Road and Belmont Avenue. Execution of this review through 2012 will allow for any traffic calming design requirements to be incorporated into the roadway design. Please refer to Appendix `A' -Traffic Calming Priority Listing, Major Collector Roadways for an outline of this priority listing. 8-7 1 Staff Re ort p I~t`r~.~-~~,i~iER ~nfrastrurture Servrces Department www.kitthenerta ALIGNMENT WITH CITY OF KITCHENER STRATEGIC PLAN: This initiative falls under the Community Priority of Quality of Life. "Work with partners, including all orders of government, to create a culture of safety in our community." The improved traffic flow and safety will provide positive direction for motorists. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Transportation Planning is provided budget funding to support the execution of four (4) traffic calming reviews each year. It is recommended that the execution of a traffic calming review for Glasgow Street be considered one of the four (4) locations for traffic calming reviews in 2012 and, thereby, will be supported by current budget funding. COMMUNICATIONS: The execution of a traffic calming review for Glasgow Street between Fischer Hallman Road and Belmont Avenue is reliant upon the input of the local residents. Accordingly, a minimum of two (2) public meetings will be held with the residents to ensure their inclusion in this review, as well as a final resident survey to ensure that the recommended measures are supported by the local residents. CONCLUSION: The upcoming reconstruction of Glasgow Street provides an opportunity to incorporate traffic calming measures into the roadway design, thereby having a positive impact on traffic conditions through this corridor. Based on traffic conditions experienced on Glasgow Street, and its standing on our traffic calming priority listing, it is recommended that a traffic calming review be executed in 2012 for Glasgow Street between Fischer Hallman Road and Belmont Avenue. Traffic calming measures approved through this review would be then constructed along with the 2013 and 2014 scheduled roadway reconstructions. ACKNOWLEDGED BY: Pauline Houston, Deputy CAO Infrastructure Services Department 8-8 Sta~'Re ort p I~[`r~,~-~~,ivER ~nfrastru~ture Servrces Department r~ki~~~~~erca Appendix `A' -Traffic Calming Priority Listing, Major Collector Roadways W N N N N N N N N N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O co oa J W Cn ~ W N ~ O CD 0~ J W Ui ~ W N ~ O D Qp J D (J1 ~ W N ~ . n ~ m ~ ~ N ~ v oo ~• 3 D ~ cn v ~ fi 0 a ~ °~ 0 m 0 ~ 0 v ~ m ~ ~ ~ c D ~ 0 v ~ < m N ~ s -• ~ v x 0 v O °o O °o ~ °' ~ m ~ y ~ o• ~ p °o O h! ~ 3 '~i ° ~ rt D m D v ~ 3 ~ N ~ 3 ~° (D ~ 3 ~ n ? o O ~ m U1 D o ~ ~ A fA D o ~ U7 ~ o N v, (Q ~ ~ L11 D N (O o ~ Q W rt D N m W ~ N o ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ m N rt ~ 3 ~ (D o 7 < ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cn ~7 ~ ~ ~ cn 0 ~ N _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~ l Y _N (p N ~ ~ 3 ~ W ~ ~ T~7 N //~~ l/ ~ ~ p W N N E ~ ~ ~ ~ O a (D ~ ~ ~ rt 7 ~ 3 o Q ~ ~ O r ~ v, ~ ~ rt C a ~ 3 D ~ o o O G ~ (D o C rt W O L 3 o O N X W fD < ~ ~ 7 a ~ rt O ,1 ~ '~ O O ~ ~ N D N C - ~ ~ 'G < N ~ a N C In ~ D <_ N /~~ 1r+ n T ~ ID ~ ~ ~ = ~ i ~ ~ a rt 0 '* Ort N m p 3 (/J W fD N X W rt Q N O 0 0 I N N O rN ~ O O cn 0 cn 0 cn 0 cn 0 cn 0 cn 0 cn 0 cn 0 cn 0 cn 0 cn 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 cn 0 cn 0 cn 0 cn 0 cn 0 cn 0 cn 0 w 0 cn 0 ~ 0 cn 0 cn 0 cn 0 cn 0 cn 0 cn 0 cn 0 ~~ r+ Q \° ~ '..1 0 CTS O W O z D Cn O Ui J Ui W Ui Ui Ui ~ Ui (0 Ui J ~ OD W O W O Cfi N (J1 ~ CTi CO Cn N W W D D D N ~ W D O Cr N J O J D Cn ~ fJ1 D CJ1 CO W W W ~ N p .a Q. 0 0 fD Q Q ~ O ~ O O O J W CJ1 ~ Co J O ~ 0 ~ 0 N ~ (D N ~ D ~ W ~ N O 1 O N N 0 N 0 ~ D !D ~ W ~ ~ O ~ Q 3 O ~ H A ~ ` O ' O O O J W Ui ~ (0 J O ~ O ~ O N ~ (D N ~ W ~ O ~ N D 1 O N N O N D ~ D C0 ~ W ~ ~ ~ N ^ ,~/ ~ ~ W N W N ~ W W ~ ~ ~ W ~ Cn ~ Cn ~ ~ N W ~ J Cn ~ m J D W ~ ~ p ~ W Ui O 00 J Ui O ~ Ui ~ Ui ~ J O W J ~ O c0 ~ W O D W Cn W Cfi ~ W J Cn W W ~ ~ ~ CO ~ Ui W ~ N OD c0 Ct1 07 t0 O W m W Cn W J J ~ ~ N S W W W Ui d0 W ~ ~ D D D ~ ~ W W D N N O QD ~ J CO ~ W W ~ ~ ~° H z ~ ~ W N W N ~ W W ~ ~ ~ W ~ Ui ~ Ui ~ N W ~ J Ui ~ m J OD W O D O ~ ~ 0 Cn ~ 0 00 00 0 Cn ~ 0 ~ W 0 ~ W 0 ~ W 0 O ~ 0 J N 0 ~ O 0 ~ J 0 ~ O 0 W W 0 W D 0 ~ ~ 0 J D 0 W ~ 0 ~ D ~ N O cD N O Cn J O ~ N O c0 O O c0 t0 O cD ~ O W J O W D O W 00 O J N O W Q 0 3 ~~ 0 ~ ~ N W W ~ W ~ J Cn D N N J ~ J cD OD cD ~ J Cn ~ J W O D ~ N ~ ~ J ~ 3~ O rt N N ~ H ~ ~ W ~ ~ c0 J W ' ' Cn ~ ~ Cn W ~ N N ~ W ~ W 1 ~ D ~ N ~ W N N ~ G' ~ ~J I y ~ O W ~ QD Cn ~ W O W CO W O W N N N, 0 ~ 3 ~ r O i/I ~ ~ D D D O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D D ~ ~ p ~ N ~ ~ p ~ D 1 D ~ ~ D N ~ i ~ r ~ ~D ~ ~ OD W CTi 00 W Ui Ui W W ~ O W W ~ J Ui W W W W J t0 W 00 J W O O W W W J 00 Ui J O D O CTi W N J Ui J O N d0 W 07 O J N QD O W J N O ~~ ,* y 3 H y ~/1 ~ 0 N ~ W D ~ ~ Cn D CTi N m Cn J ~ ~ J W ~ ' ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ N ~ W Cn 1 ~ ~ J J ~ J D W W ~ J ~ W ~ ~ ~ W 0 ~ fA D CO ~ c W cD 07 J c0 ~ W O O O O N J W OD J N Cr W D J QD W ~ 0 3 fA N ~ J ~ W Ui W J D QD ~ J W ~ ~ N 07 W ~ D W 1 ~ ~ D D J N O ~ 0] ~ J ~ J ~ d0 0 3 rt N O O O O O O O O O O O O W O 0 0 0 i 0 0 J1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0. !D pl N W O W W O i i i O i i O O W n O O n W n n n n O W n n n n n !D 0. 0 N rt pl 3 N m ~~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o cn o o cn o 0 0 0 0 o cn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ V ~ 01 ~ 01 ~ t0 ~ t0 N O N O N ~ N ~ N N N ~ N ~ N V N 0) N t0 N t0 N t0 W O W O W ~ W N W V W OD W OD W 00 ~ O ~ ~ ~ N ~ W N N ~. ~ ~ ~ N 8-9