Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011-04-21ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITTEE MINUTES APRIL 21, 2011 CITY OF KITCHENER The Environmental Committee met this date commencing at 4:05 p. m. Present: Ms. S. Smith -Chair Councillors Y. Fernandes and B. Vrbanovic, Ms. L. Matthews, Ms. S. Danckert, Ms. B. Ciochon and Messrs. S. Grossman, D. Hoshowsky, M. Peterson and R. Younis Staff: W. Sleeth, Landscape Architect C. Musselman, Senior Environmental Planner D. Saunderson, Committee Administrator 1. COMPASS KITCHENER ALL ADVISORY COMMITTEE WORKSHOP The Committee was in receipt this date of correspondence from Compass Kitchener inviting all members of the City's advisory committees to participate in the annual All Advisory Committee Gathering on May 28, 2011 from 9-11:00 a. m., at Wilfrid Laurier's Faculty of Social Work. Ms. S. Smith noted that anyone wishing to attend needs to RSVP by May 20, 2011. 2. MULTI-USE PATHWAY (COMMUNITY TRAIL) MASTER PLAN The Committee was in receipt of a presentation prepared by MMM Group and Eco Plans Ltd., entitled "Multi-use Pathways Master Plan and Implementation Strategy, Environmental Committee -Project Update", dated April 21, 2011. Mr. Jay Cranstone, MMM Group, presented the draft Multi-use Pathway (Community Trail) Master Plan, advising that the goal is to define and prioritize a network of continuous off-road walking and cycling trails that provide active and complete links to all the major destinations within the City. He stated that there has been an emphasis on shifting from personal vehicle use to other modes of transportation, thereby increasing the public demand for ahigh-quality, connected trail network. Mr. Cranstone advised that the Master Plan is meant to provide short, medium and long-term goals for dealing with the design, development and operation of a multi- use pathway network. He noted that the project was undertaken in three separate phases: Phase One: Understanding Resources, which included research, reviewing current inventory conditions and public consultation; Phase Two: the Development of the Master Plan; and, Phase Three: Finalizing the Master Plan. Currently, the project is in Phase Three with the anticipation that the final recommendations will be presented to the Community and Infrastructure Services Committee on May 30, 2011. Councillor Y. Fernandes questioned whether the public consultation methods used to receive feedback from the residents was sufficient to create policies and strategies that adequately reflect the entire City. Mr. Cranstone advised that the on-line survey was just one of the public consultation methods used to obtain information from citizens. He noted that there were also two scheduled open houses and organized stakeholder sessions, which included several members of the public. Questions were raised regarding the potential costs of implementation and whether private industries have been considered for funding some of the maintenance and expansion fees. Mr. Cranstone advised that the implementation strategies do take into consideration the potential of private partnerships to both expand and maintain the trail system. In areas of new development, consideration has been given to include the installation of new trails in the development process. Mr. Cranstone further advised that the City would also be eligible for additional funding through the Infrastructure Funding Projects due to the development of the Master Plan. 3. MULTI-USE PATHWAY (COMMUNITY TRAIL) MASTER PLAN - SUB-COMMITTEE REPORT The Committee was in receipt this date of the Multi-use Pathway (Community Trail) Master Plan Sub-Committee report, providing comments on the Multi-use Pathway (Community Trail) Master Plan. Mr. S. Grossman, on behalf of the Sub-Committee, spoke in support of the draft Master Plan, advising that the document is well organized. He led the Committee in a review of the Sub-Committee report highlighting the following comments/suggestions: ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITTEE MINUTES APRIL 21, 2011 - 12 - CITY OF KITCHENER 3. MULTI-USE PATHWAY (COMMUNITY TRAIL) MASTER PLAN - SUB-COMMITTEE REPORT (CONT'D) • the document would be enhanced if it included sections relating to: implementation; operations and maintenance; summary of recommendations; or, next steps; • consideration should be given to the use of more accessible language to increase the potential readership; • providing everyday examples of environmental savings would help demonstrate and add additional incentives to encourage people to change their behaviours towards environmental protection; • additional research should be undertaken with regards to the Water Bean Grand River Community Trails Corporation and the Grand River Community Trails Foundation; and, • the Walter Bean Grand River Community Trails Corporation was incorporated in 1998 not 1996 as stated on page 16 of 3.1.6 of the Trails Master Plan. The Foundation was formed in 2000. In response to comments put forward by the Sub-committee, Mr. W. Sleeth advised that the Multi-use Pathway (Community Trail) Master Plan was being developed at the same time as the Official Plan review, which presented an opportunity to make recommendations for additional/new policies to be incorporated into the Official Plan specific to multi-use pathways. He commented that public education will be a key function of the Master Plan and the Committee's feedback regarding format will be considered when the document is revised. Several members questioned whether there would be an additional opportunity to provide feedback. Mr. Sleeth advised that the development of the Master Plan has an aggressive timeline, and considering the Sub-committee's feedback, there may be an opportunity to extend the public review period to receive additional feedback from the Committee. He agreed to notify the Committee once the Master Plan has been revised. 4. EARTH DAY 2011 STATUS REPORT Ms. C. Musselman reminded members that April 22, 2011 is Earth Day, and encouraged everyone to participate in an Earth Day event in their community. She stated that this year over 60 neighbourhoods have registered to organize their own community clean-up, adding that City staff will be participating in the 20 Minute Makeover. She reminded members that the Kitchener Natural Area would be hosting an Earth Day event on April 23, 2011, starting at 1:00 p. m. 5. ANNUAL SELECTION OF THE BEST BETS -SUB-COMMITTEE REPORT The Committee was in receipt of correspondence from the Air Quality in Kitchener Best Bets Sub-Committee, dated April 12, 2011 concerning the proposed Five Best Bets for 2011. Ms. L. Matthews advised that the Sub-Committee reviewed the 19 potential Best Bets that were identified through the Committee's ranking process, and have recommended actions from four of the seven functional areas outlined in Kitchener's Strategic Plan for the Environment. Concerns were raised regarding recommended Best Bet #4 and whether this initiative has already been accomplished. Ms. C. Mussleman advised that the Best Bets can be action items or can reiterate environmental initiatives that are currently being undertaken to emphasize their importance. It was noted that any recommendation from the Committee concerning this matter would be considered at the May 30, 2011 Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee meeting, to permit the public announcement of the 2011 Best Bets by Clean Air Day on June 8, 2011. On motion by Mr. M. Peterson - itwas resolved: "That in accordance with the Air Quality in Kitchener (2010) Report, attached to Development Technical Services Department DTS-10-149 approved August 2010, the following be approved as the Five Best Bets for 2011: ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITTEE MINUTES APRIL 21, 2011 - 13 - CITY OF KITCHENER 5. ANNUAL SELECTION OF THE BEST BETS -SUB-COMMITTEE REPORT (CONT'D) Best Bet # 1 - encourage the continuation of retrofits and/or installation of bike lanes, paths and sidewalk connections that link trails to provide safer routes, a mix of recreational routes and encourage more users [Recommended Action 1.3c from the Air Quality in Kitchener Report (2010)]; and, Best Bet # 2 - the City of Kitchener should promote educational opportunities that would inform citizens of the benefits of natural areas re: benefits of trees and wetlands -particularly native species [Recommended Action 1.1 b from the Air Quality in Kitchener Report (2010)]; and, Best Bet # 3 - support a Public Bike Sharing Program. The system could provide free or affordable access to thousands of bicycles as alternatives to private vehicles [Recommended Action 3.1a from the Air Quality in Kitchener Report (2010)]; and, Best Bet # 4 - encourage the Region of Waterloo to open or enable permanent localized recycling / electronic / hazardous waste drop off depots [Recommended Action 6.2a from the Air Quality in Kitchener report (2010)]; and, Best Bet # 5 - encourage considerations of the implications for air quality and global climate change during the development of long-range plans [Recommended Action 4.2b from the Air Quality in Kitchener Report (2010)]; and further, That staff through the City's Environmental Study Group be directed to investigate the feasibility and, if appropriate, pursue the implementation of the Air Quality in Kitchener Five Best Bets for 2011." 6. ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITTEE 2011-2012 WORK PLAN - IDENTIFICATION OF COMMITTEE PRIORITIES The Committee considered a revised draft of its 2011-2012 Work Plan, dated March 9, 2011. In addition, the Committee was in receipt of a ranking chart, containing the members' rankings of the newly suggested Work Plan items. Ms. C. Musselman provided an overview of the circulated materials, advising that the current Work Plan has several initiatives still to be completed or are currently underway. She suggested that the Committee might want to select their top two or three items to be included in that document. She noted that the newly selected Work Plan items would be compiled into a consolidated list, which would include potential timelines for completion; and, brought forward for consideration at the May 19, 2011 Environmental Committee meeting. Ms. S. Smith suggested that the Committee could select from the following ranked items, which received either first or second place votes: • joint meeting with the Cycling Advisory Committee; • the establishment of Environmental Benchmarks; • Rapid Transit Review; • Brownfield's annual update; and, • the Development of Sustainability Indicators. Several members spoke in support of having a joint committee meeting with the Cycling Advisory Committee to discuss items of common interest. Ms. Musselman stated that she could speak with the Committee Administrator for the Cycling Committee to inquire about the potential for a joint meeting. Questions were raised regarding what expectations would be placed on the Committee if the `establishment of benchmarks' was chosen as a Work Plan item. Ms. Musselman advised that ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITTEE MINUTES APRIL 21, 2011 - 14 - CITY OF KITCHENER 6. ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITTEE 2011-2012 WORK PLAN - IDENTIFICATION OF COMMITTEE PRIORITIES (CONT'D) staff are presently pursuing the establishment of environmental indicators/benchmarks. She noted that the Committee assisted with the identification of environmental indicators that have been used to help measure and monitor the implementation of the City's Strategic Plan for the Environment. She added that staff could provide additional information to clarify the purpose of these indicators. Councillor B. Vrbanovic commented that in addition to the environmental indicators suggested by Ms. Musselman, there are additional opportunities to achieve environmental benchmarks that the Committee could undertake as part of its Work Plan. He advised that the City is a member of Partners for Climate Protection (PCP), which is associated with the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI), a program that uses afive-milestone framework to reduce greenhouse gases. He spoke to other environmental programs, such as `The Natural Step', which are also dedicated to building more successful and sustainable environmental futures, and suggested that those programs may help engage the community. To better understand the various programs, the Committee requested that staff provide additional information on PCP, ICELEI and `the Natural Step'. Councillor Y. Fernandes requested clarification on the `Hang to Dry Campaign' and questioned how the Committee would complete this as an action item. Ms. Musselman stated that the use of clotheslines were previously prohibited in neighbourhoods throughout the City due to restrictive covenants that were signed at the time of purchasing a home. She noted that covenants restricting the use of clotheslines are not enforceable. She further advised that as a Work Plan item the Committee could consider implementing an education program promoting the use of clotheslines and highlighting their environmental savings. Mr. M. Peterson suggested that the Stormwater Management Annual update could be considered as an action item and questioned whether the Committee would have an opportunity to participate in the creation of the rebate program for homeowners who undertake initiatives to reduce their stormwater run-off. Councillor Fernandes suggested that the Committee should take a tour of the Residential Energy Efficiency Project CREEP) House to learn more about the different stormwater initiatives. Ms. Mussleman agreed to contact Engineering staff regarding the potential for the Committee to play a role in the creation of the Stormwater Management rebate program. Councillor Fernandes questioned whether an Annual Brownfield update could be considered as a Work Plan item. Ms. Musselman noted that she would speak with the City's Brownfield Co-ordinator, about giving a presentation at a future Committee meeting. Ms. Musselman stated that the requested information would be presented at the May 19, 2011 Environmental Committee meeting, to help finalize the 2011-2012 Environmental Committee Work Plan. ADJOURNMENT On motion, this meeting adjourned at 6:22 p. m. D. Saunderson Committee Administrator