HomeMy WebLinkAboutCSD-11-144 - 2011 Urban Design Awards and Mike Wagner HeritageJ
Staff Reporf
KITC;H~,~T~R Community Services Department www.kircnenerca
REPORT T0: Community & Infrastructure Services Committee
DATE OF MEETING: November 7, 2011
SUBMITTED BY: Alain Pinard, Director of Planning
PREPARED BY: Heather Holbrook, Planner (Urban Design), 519-741-2324
Michelle Drake, Heritage Planner, 519-741-2839
WARD(S) INVOLVED: All Wards
DATE OF REPORT: October 27, 2011
REPORT NO.: CSD-11-144
SUBJECT: 2011 Urban Design Awards and Mike Wagner Heritage
Award s
RECOMMENDATION:
For Information
BACKGROUND:
The purpose of this report is to inform Council and the public of the 2011 Urban Design Award
and Mike Wagner Heritage Award recipients. Urban design and heritage conservation efforts
are recognized through the Urban Design Awards and Mike Wagner Heritage Awards. The
Urban Design Awards were established in 1988 to recognize projects that exemplify superior
design contributions while the Mike Wagner Heritage Awards were established in 1997 to pay
tribute to property owners and businesses who have contributed to the conservation of cultural
heritage resources. The 2011 Urban Design Awards and Mike Wagner Heritage Awards were
presented concurrently at a reception held in the City Hall rotunda on October 5, 2011. The
award recipients are identified and described in this report.
REPORT:
Urban Design Awards
In 1988 Council endorsed the idea of presenting Urban Design Awards in recognition of projects
which exemplified superior design contributions to the City. Since then, the City of Kitchener
has presented Urban Design Awards every two years. In 2010 Council approved an amendment
to the Urban Design Awards program and deferred the 2010 Urban Design Awards to 2011. The
revised Urban Design Awards program now recognizes more categories of Urban Design
projects and has more rigorous evaluation criteria. The amendment resulted in changes to the
Judging Committee composition and the format in which the awards are presented. The City of
Kitchener's Urban Design Awards recognize industry leaders who exemplify a commitment to
design excellence and create a built environment that enhances our quality of life.
There are seven categories in the City of Kitchener Urban Design Awards noted below:
IF2-1
J
Staff Reporf
KITC;H~,~T~R Community Services Department www.kircnenerca
1. Low Rise Buildings (1- 3 storeys and 2. Mid to High Rise Buildings (4 storeys and u~) -
given in recognition of a building that makes a positive contribution to the public realm
and demonstrates urban design excellence and creativity through a sensitive
understanding of the context, site plan, massing and pedestrian amenities.
3. Civic Projects -given to public sector projects, including both Civic Buildings and Public
Spaces, that make a significant contribution to the overall quality of the public realm.
4. Urban Elements -given in recognition of components of the urban environment that
contribute significantly to the quality of the public realm in the City.
5. Visionsl Master Plans -given in recognition of a plan or study of a significant area within
the City that provides a development strategy for urban transformation.
6. Neighbourhood Design -given in recognition of approved and built subdivisions within
the City that implement the design objectives of the Design Brief for Suburban
Development and Neighbourhood Mixed Use Centres.
7. Student Projects -given in recognition of exemplary theoretical or studio projects
relating to urban design and/or the public realm for a study site located in the City of
Kitchener.
The 2011 Urban Design Awards ceremony was the eleventh presentation of the Urban Design
Awards. More than fifty nominations were submitted for review for projects completed between
January 1, 2008 and May 9, 2011.
A judging committee evaluated nominations in the Low Rise Buildings, Urban Elements and
Civic Projects categories. A staff subcommittee evaluated nominations in the Student Projects
and VisionslMaster Plans categories. Judges declare conflict of interests and do not vote on
projects in which their firm participated with. Members of the judging panel included:
• Councillor Berry Vrbanovic Chair of the Urban Design Awards Committee
• Brian Campbell, Managing Senior Associate SurveyslGeomatics, Stantec Consulting Ltd.,
First Vice President Waterloo Region Home Builders Association
• Jim Fryett, President, James Fryett Architect Inc., Architect
• Leo Guddemi, Landscape Architect, Stantec, Landscape Architect
• Glenn Scheels, Principal, GSP Group, Urban Planner
• Carrie Curtis, Manager, Municipal Division, MTE Consultants Inc., Engineer
The following projects were awarded by the Judging committees:
Award of Excellence- Low Rise Building
• MHBC Office Building, 540 Bingemans Centre Drive
• Enermodal Engineering, 582 Lancaster Street West
Award of Excellence -Civic Projects
• King Street & City Centre District Streetscape
• Waterloo Region Museum, 10 Huron Road
Award of Excellence -Urban Elements
• Streetscape: Office Building, 447 Frederick Street
• Building Entry: Anselma House, 700 Heritage Drive
IF2-2
J
Staff Reporf
KITC;H~,~T~R Community Services Department www.kircnenerca
• Facade: Eastforest Homes Design Studio, 155 Washburn Drive
• Site Circulation: Sportsworld Crossing, Sportsworld Crossing Drive
• Building Massing: Williamsburg Town Centre, 1187 Fischer Hallman Road
Award of Excellence- Master Plans/Visions
• The Boardwalk,100, 105 and 120 Ira Needles Boulevard
Award of Excellence -Student Projects
• MOWTOWN: A Sustainable Urban Village
Mike Wagner Heritage Awards
The Mike Wagner Heritage Award program was established in 1997 to pay tribute to property
owners and businesses who have contributed to the conservation of the City's cultural heritage
resources. The program is named after former City Councillor Mike Wagner who served on City
Council from 1989 to 1997, and who was a strong advocate for heritage, culture and the arts.
The program has recognized projects that have contributed to the conservation of cultural
heritage resources through adaptive re-use, rehabilitation and restoration. In 2010 Council
approved revisions to the program and deferred the 2010 awards to 2011. The revised Mike
Wagner Heritage Award program better reflects current trends in heritage conservation and
establishes a consistent, fair and transparent process. The revised program includes three
award categories along with eligibility requirements and evaluation criteria.
The three award categories are:
1. Preservation /Restoration of Cultural Heritage Resources
Preservation projects involve protecting, maintaining and stabilizing the existing form,
material and integrity of a cultural heritage resource while protecting its heritage attributes
and values. Preservation projects generally relate to cultural heritage resources that are
intact and do not require extensive repair, extensive replacement, alterations or additions.
Restoration projects involve revealing, recovering or representing the state of a cultural
heritage resource or of an individual heritage attribute as it appeared at a particular period in
its history, as accurately as possible, while protecting its heritage value. Restoration projects
are based on physical and documentary or oral evidence.
2. Rehabilitation /Adaptive Reuse of Cultural Heritage Resources
Rehabilitation and Adaptive Reuse projects involve the sensitive adaptation of a cultural
heritage resource or of an individual heritage attribute for a continuing or compatible
contemporary use, while protecting its heritage value. This may be achieved through
repairs, replacements, alterations andlor additions.
3. Individual Contributions to the Field of Heritage Conservation
Awarded to individuals, businesses, organizations or institutions who have made
exceptional andlor long lasting contributions to the conservation of cultural heritage
resources.
The 2011 Mike Wagner Heritage Awards ceremony was the 10th presentation of the Mike
Wagner Heritage Awards. Two nominations were received for individuals and two nominations
were received for projects completed before May 9, 2011.
IF2-3
J
Staff Reporf
KITC;H~,~T~R Community Services Department www.kircnenerca
Heritage Planning staff and the City's Heritage Kitchener Committee evaluated nominations in
the Individual Contributions to the Field of Heritage Conservation Award and the Rehabilitation l
Adaptive Reuse Award categories. Recommendations of Heritage Planning staff and the City's
Heritage Kitchener Committee regarding the 2011 Mike Wagner Heritage Awards recipients
were forwarded to Council forfinal approval.
The following individuals andlor projects were awarded by Council:
Individual Contributions to the Field of Heritage Conservation Award
^ Nyle Eby
^ Audrey Becker
Rehabilitation /Adaptive Reuse Award
^ The Donneworth Farmhouse, 397 Gravel Ridge Trail
^ The Tannery District, 113-151 Charles St. W. l 170-188 Joseph St. / 3-44 Francis St. S.
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT:
All members of the public were invited to nominate projects considered worthy of recognition
through the Urban Design Awards or Mike Wagner Heritage Awards programs earlier this year.
A call for nominations was sent by mail and advertised through various means including media
releases and advertising in Your Kitchener News.
A press release was issued October 20, 2011 to notify the public of the award-winning projects.
Videos from the awards ceremony can be viewed at www.kitchener.ca. Descriptions of all the
award-winning projects have been posted on the City's website and are attached as Appendix A
and B to Report CSD-11-144.
ALIGNMENT WITH CITY OF KITCHENER STRATEGIC PLAN:
The City has places, spaces and stories that enrich, enlighten and guide growth and
development. Exemplary urban design projects and cultural heritage resources are integral to
the identity of the City, but they also play a significant role in economic development by helping
to enhance quality of life, strengthen distinctiveness, stimulate revitalization and attract tourism.
The Urban Design Awards and Mike Wagner Heritage Awards publicly acknowledge excellence
in urban design and heritage conservation. As a result, both programs support the Quality of
Life Community Priority of the City of Kitchener Strategic Plan.
REVIEWED BY:
Brian Page, Supervisor of Site Plan Development
Brandon Sloan, Manager of Long Range and Policy Planning
ACKNOWLEDGED BY: Jeff Willmer, Deputy CAO
Community Services Department
Atta~hmPntc
AppendixA-2011 Urban Design Awards-Winning Project descriptions
Appendix B - 2011 Mike Wagner Heritage Awards- Winning Project descriptions
IF2-4
Urban Desian Awards 201 1
e
Low rise Buildings
Given in recognition of a building that makes a positive contribution to the public realm and
demonstrates urban design excellence and creativity through a sensitive understanding of the
context, site plan, massing and pedestrian amenities.
MHBC Office
540 Bingemans Centre Drive
To recognize the attention to detail in the
design of the building and site. A
significant degree of building articulation
coupled with high quality exterior finishes
make the building worthy of recognition.
The site design includes well maintained
landscaping and highly legible pedestrian
circulation routes, both of which
contribute to the success of the
development as a whole.
Award Recipients:
Owner: MHBC
Architect: ABA Architects Inc.
Civil Engineer: MTE Consultants Inc.
Lighting Consultant: Mighton
Engineering Ltd.
General Contractor: Melloul-Blarney
Construction Inc.
IF2-5
Urban Desian Awards 201 1
e
Low rise Buildings
Given in recognition of a building that makes a positive contribution to the public realm and
demonstrates urban design excellence and creativity through a sensitive understanding of the
context, site plan, massing and pedestrian amenities.
Enermodal Engineering
582 Lancaster Street West
a~~~ ..
~.
~_
i
AA 'dvv~
11
.~ - s: C -
/ ~ ~ r~ ~~ j ~~~ I
:.:,
~~, ,~ a z
aJ6
To recognize a building and site design
which is well designed, detailed and
articulated. The exterior finishes of the
building are of the utmost quality. The site
design boasts excellent pedestrian
circulation through the site and beyond
the site as it seamlessly integrates with
the nearby trail network. The project
incorporates countless sustainable
building and site design elements,
ranking it as one of the most exemplary
sustainable development projects in the
City of Kitchener to date.
Award Recipients:
Owner: Enermodal Engineering
Architect: Robertson Simmons Architect
Inc.
Landscape Architect: Roth & Associates
Civil Engineer: MTE Consultants Inc.
Lighting Consultant: Enermodal
Engineering
General Contractor: Melloul-Blarney
Construction Inc.
IF2-6
Urban Desian Awards 201 1
e
Civic Projects -Civic Building
Awarded to public sector projects, including both Civic Buildings and Public Spaces, that
make a significant contribution to the overall quality of the public realm.
Waterloo Region Museum
10 Huron Road
In recognition of exemplary site layout
and built form design. Both the building
siting and architectural choices in the
design details of the building pay
homage to the rail line and road
alignments that were part of
Kitchener's historic growth patterns.
The glass panel wall and main foyer of
the building activate this site and give
the site a distinct and iconic street
presence.
Award Recipients:
Owner: Region of Waterloo
Architect) Landscape ArchitectlUrban
Planner: Moriyama & Teshima Architects
Civil Engineer) Lighting Consultant)
General Contractor: The Walter Fedy
Partnership
IF2-7
Urban Desian Awards 201 1
e
Civic Projects -Public Spaces
Awarded to public sector projects, including both Civic Buildings and Public Spaces, that
make a significant contribution to the overall quality of the public realm.
King Street & City Centre District Streetscape
King Street East
The King Street streetscape creates a
unique pedestrian walking
environment through its use of flexible
parking, pedestrian scale lighting and
planters. The integration of movable
bollards along the street edge creates
the opportunity to change the use of
the sidewalk form parking to outdoor
cafes quickly and easily. The
incorporation of bio swale planters and
seat walls showcase green technology
and makes it accessible to the public.
The integration of pedestrian scale
lighting with informal and formal
seating opportunities creates a
public realm that is inviting and
functional at all hours of the day.
Award Recipients:
Owner: City of Kitchener
Landscape Architect: IBI Group
General Contractor: Steed and Evans Ltd
Lighting Consultant: John MacDonald
Architect Inc.
IF2-8
r~\ V \l-
Urban Desian Awards 201 1
e
Urban Elements- Streetscape
Given in recognition of components of the urban environment that contribute significantly to the
quality of the public realm in the City.
Office Building
447 Frederick Street '~'
In recognition of a building design that
makes a positive contribution to the
streetscape and helps define the
intersection. The orientation of the
building massing is such that it addresses
the street corner and relates to the public
sidewalk. A variety and high quality of
building finishes help give this building
definition at this prominent location at the
intersection of two busy streets. The
scale of development is in keeping with
the surrounding built environment and is
of a human scale. For these reasons this
development is worthy of recognition for
its contribution to the streetscape.
Award Recipients:
Owner: Richard Wagner
Architect: ABA Architects Inc.
Urban Planner: Labreche Patterson and
Associates Inc.
IF2-9
Urban Desian Awards 201 1
e
Urban Elements- Building Entry
Given in recognition of components of the urban environment that contribute significantly to the
quality of the public realm in the City.
Anselma House
700 Heritage Drive ''~
- - ~-
In recognition of an exemplary treatment
of the main building entry as a prominent
and attractive feature of the overall site
design. The architectural detailing of the
primary building entrance including
articulation and a good variety of building
materials contribute to its aesthetic
appeal. The entry is easily identified as
the primary entrance to the building and
is easily accessible from the public
sidewalk and onsite parking area. For
these reasons the design of the building
entry is worthy of recognition as a focal
~~~~,'~ point in the overall design of the site.
Award Recipients:
Owner: Women's Crisis Services of
Waterloo Region
Architect: MMMC Inc. Architects
IF2-10
Urban Desian Awards 201 1
e
Urban Elements- Facade
Given in recognition of components of the urban environment that contribute significantly to the
quality of the public realm in the City.
Eastforest Homes Design Studio
155 Washburn Drive
__ . . ti ~ ~-
In recognition of exemplary facade
treatments. The use of fenestration
animates the facade and creates an
inviting entry. The facade finishes,
including material choices, light
treatments and colour variation are all
well executed. Ultimately the design of
the facade of this building exemplifies the
"wow factor" that is worthy of recognition.
Award Recipients:
Owner: Eastforest Homes Ltd.
Architect: James Fryett Architect
IF2-11
Urban Desian Awards 201 1
e
Urban Elements- Site Circulation
Given in recognition of components of the urban environment that contribute significantly to the
quality of the public realm in the City.
Sportsworld Crossing
Sportsworld Crossing Drive
Owner: Intermarket Group for GPM Managed
Investments
Architect: Petroff Partnership Architects
Urban Planner: MHBC
Landscape Architect: TerraPlan Landscape
Architects
Lighting Consultant: Hammerschlag & Joffe
In recognition of site planning with
excellent attention to site circulation. This
development incorporates many
elements that assist in wayfinding and
ease of pedestrian movement throughout
the site. Building orientation is well
executed, as building entries have been
sited in highly visible locations to
demarcate terminating views. Various
modes of transportation, including transit
and cycling have been carefully
considered and integrated into the site
design. Loading areas for commercial
businesses are well concealed from
public view. Careful consideration was
given to the retention of existing
vegetation. Perhaps most noteworthy is
the prominent pedestrian walkway,
complete with pedestrian-scaled lighting,
upgraded paving treatments and high
quality landscaping which delineates a
clear pedestrian route through the
parking area. This element of the site is
truly worthy of recognition.
IF2-12
Award Recipients:
Urban Desian Awards 201 1
e
Urban Elements- Building Massing
Given in recognition of components of the urban environment that contribute significantly to the
quality of the public realm in the City.
Williamsburg Town Centre
1187 Fischer Hallman Road
~~
In recognition of outstanding site design
with respect to building massing. This
commercial development has oriented
the parking towards the rear of the site
and brought the predominant building
mass toward the street and sidewalk. The
scale of the building is designed to the
human scale. Enhanced building
articulation at the corner animates the
street. The scale and orientation of the
building enhances the public realm by
contributing to the streetscape and
creating a quality pedestrian space.
Award Recipients:
Owner: Schlegel Urban Development
Architect: Cornerstone Architecture
Incorporated
Urban Planner: Zelinka Priamo Ltd.
IF2-13
Urban Desian Awards 201 1
e
Master Plan Project
Awarded for a plan or study of a significant area within the City that provides a development
strategy for urban transformation.
The Boardwalk
100, 105 and 120 Ira Needles Boulevard
In recognition of an exemplary Master
Plan fora high quality Commercial
Development. The scale of the study
area, ranging over 18 hectares, and
complexity of the issues were unique
challenges overcome in the Master Plan
process. Excellent coordination occurred
among a number of agencies, including
the Region of Waterloo, City of Waterloo
and the City of Kitchener, while balancing
the functional needs and development
interests of numerous clients involved.
The Master Plan produced through this
collaborative process demonstrates
comprehensiveness in that it proposes
solutions to a range of design challenges,
including pedestrian circulation and
connectivity, sustainability elements,
building elevations, building orientation
and the integration of various modes of
transportation.
Award Recipients:
Owner: The I NCC Corp.
Architect: A Baldassarra Architect Inc.
Urban Planner: MHBC
Landscape Architect: MHBC
Civil Engineer: Stantec
IF2-14
Urban Desian Awards 201 1
e
Student Projects
Awarded to public sector projects, including both Civic Buildings and Public Spaces, that
make a significant contribution to the overall quality of the public realm.
MOWTOWN: A Sustainable Urban Village
~~
~~~~`
,~
.a ~,
~' ~,~
l~
~.
~,
~^ ~~~
The design concept presented in this
project successfully integrated the
retained built form into an extensive
open space network and provided
a comprehensive pedestrian walking
system that combined hard scaped
and smaller park and trail-like linkages.
The project also successfully
integrated potential hazard land areas
into a unique amenity and provided a
well balanced mix of development
throughout the study site. The project
presents an innovative design solution
for the study area which is generally in
alignment with the City's Pedestrian
Charter, Parks Master Plan and
guidelines in the City's Urban Design
Manual.
Award Recipients:
Lilian Chen
Jiffy Lee
Yosef Yip
Catherine Yoon
IF2-15
~Y ti i 'i dP -
u 1
~~ ~ A
~ ~ -
~1~ y
~
~
_
~M
'~1
~~
~~'~~Y
~ ~
,y ';e ~ ~
~ ° - - 4n, ~lcr ,y4 _ ~~
N 9P 1' aF' ~ ~~~~ a., - ~ ~ 4 ~ ~t y~. ' ~ ~
~ 31a9 N i. ~
a y ~'
t
^ ~ ~ B - i
YF
'f A ~~~~ I ~'k
A ~ ~ _ .'
.. .. ,*~ u '.... '
'~ ~~.
,.~~
~ - _
.
~
r
-'.
Yyy.
~h
i, ~„
I
M
_.
Individual Contribution to the Field of Heritage Conservation Award
Awarded to individuals, businesses, organizations or institutions who have made
exceptional and/or long lasting contributions to the conservation of cultural heritage
resources.
Aw r R i i n
a ec a is
N le Eb & Audre Becker
v y y
Nyle Eby and Audrey Becker are direct descendants of Jacob and Michael
Donnenworth. Jacob Donnenworth purchased the land in 1843 and later sold the land to
his son, Michael Donnenworth, in 1853. Michael built a Waterloo County Georgian stone
farmhouse in 1856. The farmhouse remained in the Donnenworth family for 130 years.
Nyle Eby and Audrey Becker have through their personal decisions and actions
contributed to the conservation of a valued cultural heritage resource for the benefit of
future generations. The result is the conservation and integration of the rehabilitated
Donnenworth farmhouse within the Eby Estates community.
.,r [
.~~ ~ x ~ ~. i Ik'
ii
""~~p;
i~/'' ~ ~ '
~
~'~!Fv ~ ~r4 ~ .r. ~
' ~
~ . T
,. ~ *
~
;
arc.
.
/~
y - ~~ y„ ~ ,L ~ c
i 1 . ~` _ ~ j ~~~~ ~ ~ + i
~: ~
1
.t J d
~ ~.
yl`
'~i
`1
,
.
4 ~'~
~,,
i1
!~ E
~lf ~.~ 1.N ~ I5._
Q.~~
1. ~ ~,
~~ ~~
I Y• ~:
.t ~ ~ ~
~Y
IF2-16
~Y ti i 'i dP -
u 1 ~~~ ~ A ~ ~ ~ - _
~M~1~ y'~
1
~~
~~'~~Y
~ ~
,y ';e ~ ~
~ ° - - 4n, ~lcr ,y4 _ ~~
N 9P 1' aF' ~ ~~~~ a., - ~ ~
~ 31a9 N i. ~
~ ~t y~. ' ~ ~
y
4
~'
a
t
^ ~ ~ B - i
YF
'f A ~~~~ I ~'k
A ~ ~ _ .'
.. .. ,*~ u '.... '
'~ ~~.
,.~~
~ - _
.
~
r
-'.
Yyy.
~h
i, ~„
I
M
_.
Rehabi I itation /Adaptive Reuse Award
Rehabilitation and adaptive reuse projects involve the sensitive adaptation of a cultural
heritage resource or of an individual heritage attribute for a continuing or compatible
contemporary use, while protecting its heritage value. This may be achieved through
repairs, replacements, alterations and/or additions.
Th D n n w r h F rm h
e o e o t a ouse
397 Gravel Rid a Trail
g
Built circa 1856 by Michael Donnenworth, the farmhouse is constructed in the Waterloo
County Georgian architectural style. The farmhouse features stone construction, a side
gabled roof with return eaves, an off centered front entrance with porch, and 6/6 hung
windows. The conservation project involved the relocation of the 400 ton farmhouse to a
new site within the Eby Estates community and the rehabilitation of the farmhouse
following the July 8, 2007 fire, which destroyed the roof and interior wood structure. The
farmhouse was rehabilitated by repairing the stone walls; reconstructing the side gable
roof with return eaves, fascia and molded cornice; installing new wood doors and
windows; reconstructing the front and rear porch; reconstructing the end chimneys; and,
constructing a compatible one storey addition with attached two car garage. The result is
a rehabilitation project that has brought new life to the 1856 farmhouse.
...~.~
M '~ E
.
,s
/5~
~~, ~
IR RR?
RA
~
~F
~
. `
J
W
ypiF,
t~'!°t~~~ ~~jM71 ~'
{
w
.4~-YF A'
'K'~v` ~~
ti„r_. .. -
~Me Q
^^.I `
~ M _
t
~~~ ` . ~,~ ~ ~• ~a~, ~a~r ~ ~, ~.1 w r ~ ,.t
'~ ' ~
.. ~ ~ '~~
'~ ~ { ~ f 't b
66y
ry~ ~' 6*. Cpl r f ~.,~ ~„. ~ xt
.+7!"=~ ~y 5bt !3 ~ie'MC4 '~6.' ~l+.i ~r- .31d / 1~yVt"~, it
i
~ 7r5f ~ ' ,d~.fi ,w 1 ~t I ~~
„~y*~Fla'r ~ ~~.
IF2-17
~Y ti i 'i dP
u 1
~~ ~ A
~ ~
~1~ y -
-
~
~
~M
'~1
~~ _
~~'~~Y
~ ~
,y ';e
~ ° - - 4n, ~ ~
~lcr ,y4 _ ~~
N 9P 1' aF' ~ ~~~~ a., - ~ ~
~ 31a9 N i. ~
~ ~t y~. ' ~ ~
y
4
~'
a
t
^ ~ ~ B - i
YF
A 'f A ~~~~ I ~'k
~ ~ _ .'
.. .. ,*~ u '.... '
,.~~
~ -
'~ ~~.
_
.
~
r
-'.
Yyy.
~h
i, ~„
I
M
_.
Rehabi I itation /Adaptive Reuse Award
Rehabilitation and adaptive reuse projects involve the sensitive adaptation of a cultural
heritage resource or of an individual heritage attribute for a continuing or compatible
contemporary use, while protecting its heritage value. This may be achieved through
repairs, replacements, alterations and/or additions.
Th T nn r Di ri
e a e st ct
113-151 Charles St. W., 170-188 Joseph St., 3-44 Francis St. S.
The Lang Tanning Company was
,..
~
'
"~
founded in 1848 by Reinhold Lang. r ~
-
, ~ ~
~
The Lan famil members were
9 Y ~ ~~ .~., ~
~~~~~
~ ~~
prominent local industrialists whose ;
~% ~ ~~ ' ~ ,`
`
cultural and political leadership , -r-=
established Berlin as an important
urban centre of industrial activity in ~ ~~ ~ -
'~~:
southern Ontario. The company was ~~ ~ ~ ~.;-:
t
the first major industry in Berlin and it ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ - ~ - ~ ~~
became the largest sole leather ~~' - ~ ~~
,r.~ ~ - , , ; ~~ ~.
roducer in the British Em ire. The
p p ~~ ~ . ~ ~~
e ~,,
;
Tanner is com rised of a com lex of
Y p p ~
-~ ~ ~ yl~
'~
interconnected buildings on the block
3 ~~
bounded by Charles, Francis, Joseph replacement of deteriorated bricks; roof
and Victoria streets. The majority of the repairs; the repair of existing windows on the
buildings were constructed between buildings located on Francis Street and the
1896 and 1917 with significant installation of new windows of complementary
alterations and additions between 1917 design on all other buildings; the installation of
and 1925. The Tannery buildings are new doors and windows on the main floor of
good examples of vernacular industrial all buildings; the demolition of the one storey
architecture. Simple brick detailing and building at the corner of Charles Street and
durable finishes demonstrate the Victoria Street; the selective demolition of infill
functional and industrial history of the buildings; and, the construction of compatible
complex. The rehabilitation of the infill additions throughout the site. The result is
Tannery involved: the repointing of rehabilitation and adaptive reuse project that
deteriorated masonry joints; the has brought new life to the Tannery.
IF2-18