Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFCS-12-010 - E11-084 - Rockway Centre Feasibility Study BusineREPORT TO:Committee of the Whole DATE OF MEETING: 2012-02-06 SUBMITTED BY: Larry Gordon, Director of Supply Services, 2214 PREPARED BY: Larry Gordon, Director of Supply Services WARD(S) INVOLVED: N/A DATE OF REPORT: 2012-01-30 REPORT NO.: FCS-12-010 SUBJECT: E11-084 – Rockway Centre Feasibility Study & Business Case RECOMMENDATION: That Expression of Interest E11-084 – Rockway Centre Feasibility Study & Business Case, be The RETHINK GROUP, Ennismore, Ontario awarded to at their estimated fee of $35,160., including disbursements of $3,950., plus H.S.T. of $4,571., for a total of $39,731., based on a satisfactory contract being negotiated and an upset fee being established; and further, That the Director of Supply Services be authorized to execute an agreement satisfactory to the City Solicitor. BACKGROUND On December 7, 2009 staff tabled report CSD-09-071 addressing the Older Adult Strategy future directions. Within this report, it was recommended that the Rockway Senior Centre be closed, effective January 2011. In summary, four factors contributed to this recommendation being brought forward. First, emerging trends have shown that as the baby boom population reaches their older adult years, they will be requesting the provision of different programming, opportunities and venues (e.g. more active programming and the appropriate facilities to accommodate this). Research indicates that the “new” older adult has a very different perception of aging, and traditional senior centres, including the Rockway Centre, will not be able to meet their needs. Second, supporting the research and demographic trends outlined in the Older Adult Strategy, even though the number of older adults has been growing in our community, participation at Rockway Centre, in the traditional seniors programs, has been declining steadily over the past number of years. For example: a. Senior Memberships had dropped 25% from 2004 to 2009; b. Attendance in ongoing groups has declined by approximately 49% from 2004 to 2009; c. The meal program served 33% fewer meals in 2009 than in 2004; ï ·÷ ó ï d. The Marmo Travel Club membership has declined by 55% from 2004 to 2009; and, e. Attendance at special events had declined by 63%. Third, although the facility has been on a regular maintenance program and has been well maintained by the City of Kitchener’s Facilities Management Division throughout the years, given its age and the inherent site conditions there are significant challenges that will have to be addressed if the facility is not closed. This includes: a. Foundation drainage and repairs that will need to be completed to address the ingress of water into the basement; b. Accessibility renovations which will be required into the future as the demands of the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA) become more stringent; c. Elevator repairs/replacement; and d. Kitchen renovations Finally, and perhaps the most important consideration, it was found that if the Rockway Centre was closed, the majority of programs and services operating out of the facility could be housed at our more modern Community Centres. A review of space at other recreation facilities and Community Centres showed that, although one facility could not house all Rockway programs entirely, it was possible to find space to accommodate for most of the programming throughout our community. It is important to note that although there was approximately $1 million in repairs required for Rockway Centre, and this factor contributed to the rationale for closing the facility, it was not the major consideration that led to the recommendation. Understanding the trends of the future, the facility limitations and declining participation at Rockway, and considering that it was felt that existing Rockway programs could be housed at other facilities, staff felt that closing the facility was a viable option. At the December 7, 2009 Community Services Committee meeting it was resolved: i) That the Older Adult Strategy Final Report, as attached to Community Services Department report CSD-09-071, be received; and, ii) That a final decision regarding the potential closing of Rockway Senior Centre be deferred until the Community services Committee meeting scheduled for March 8, 2010, to allow further dialogue with the stakeholders; and iii) That staff provide Council with detailed information regarding the impact on the 2010 budget of the potential closing of Rockway Senior Centre by January 18, 2010; and further, iv) That in the interim, a group of citizens and staff be appointed to consult with older adult population to advise on the transition of programs from Rockway Senior Centre to alternate locations, and consider the issue of a ‘gathering place’. Over the next months staff entered into significant dialogue with citizens, user groups and Neighbourhood Associations regarding the transition of programs from Rockway to alternate locations. However, although staff believed that there was capacity at our other facilities, there lacked agreement in the community of whether a transition of programs could be completed and accommodated for without significant loss to Rockway participants. As a result, on February 22, 2010 a motion was brought forward by Council concerning the proposed closing of the Rockway Seniors Centre. The motion included the following: ï ·÷ ó î WHEREAS over the past number of years, the City of Kitchener, as part of its commitment to healthy and sustainable communities, has been both updating several long-term strategies and policies in terms of leisure and recreational delivery to the residents of Kitchener (i.e. the Parks and Recreation Operational Review, the Leisure Facilities Master Plan, the Older Adult Strategy and the Youth Strategy), and has also been reviewing how to most effectively utilize its facilities based on facility availability during certain times of day; and WHEREAS our research and Older Adult Strategy has shown and input from our residents has confirmed that we should strengthen our delivery model by further building upon or transitioning to neighbourhood community centres that serve as community resource centres and provide programming for all age groups; and, WHEREAS Kitchener Council, after hearing from many residents, recognizes that while a lack of consensus on the future of older adult programming exists, pursuing staff’s initial recommendation at this time is not in the best community interest and that additional time to further study enhanced levels of service for older adults would be in the best interest of our community; BE IT NOW RESOLVED: i) That ongoing efforts with respect to the closure of the Rockway Seniors Centre be terminated; and, ii) That the City continue working with neighbourhood associations and older adult groups towards co-ordinating and offering programming for all ages in our facilities throughout the community; and, iii) That staff prepare a report about any maintenance and/or capital requirements and future maintenance necessary in the short-term for the ongoing operations of the Rockway Seniors Centre facility; and further, iv) That staff do a feasibility study and business case analysis, including public consultation and participant involvement, to look at the long-term use of the Rockway Seniors Centre site for the provision of older adult service delivery and possible other uses. Staff are ready to move forward with item iv), the feasibility study and business case. Specifically, the feasibility study and business case will i) review and analyse past and current program and facility use at Rockway Centre; ii)review and analyze other program, service and strategic community needs that could be considered on the site, compatible and/or complementary to older adult programming; iii) assess the capacities and limitations of the Rockway facility and site; iv) identify possible amenity/site modifications that would be needed to deliver older adult programming and possible other community programs and services; v) investigate possible public and/or private partnerships; vi) evaluate alternatives; and vii) provide recommendations, including budget implications which considers the long-term use of the site for older adult programming and other possible services. ï ·÷ ó í REPORT: In accordance with Chapter 170 of the Municipal Code pertaining to the Selection of Professional Services/Consultants, a Consultant’s Review Committee was established consisting of M. Hildebrand, Director, Community Programs & Services, D. Campbell, Manager, Community Resource Centres, L. Stewart, District Facilitator Country Hills Community Centre, L. Leedham, Rockway Advisory Council and L. Gordon, Director of Supply Services. Expressions of interest were advertised publicly, on the City of Kitchener website and on the internet through the Ontario Public Buyers Association Electronic Tendering Information System relative to this project. Documents were downloaded by twenty-seven (27) interested parties, and by the closing date of Monday October 31st, 2011, three (3) responses had been received. The review committee met on Wednesday, November, 23rd, 2011, to review the submissions and a shortlist of one (1) candidate was selected for further interviews. The Committee met on Wednesday, November 30th, 2011 to interview the shortlisted candidate. The Committee elected to award the project to The RETHINK GROUP, Ennismore, Ontario. The Committee rated consultants on the following criteria: Qualifications/Expertise Evaluation of Proposed Project Manager Variety & Quality of Disciplines In House/In Consortium Past Performance /reference Knowledge of seniors’ services, facilities and municipal recreation Demonstrated ability to meet the requirements of the project Examples of Comparable Work Completed Pricing and Related Costs Completeness of Expression of Interest A listing of the responding parties follows for your reference: Milestones Strategy Management Consultants Toronto ON Monteith Brown Planning Consultants London ON The RETHINK GROUP Ennismore ON ALIGNMENT WITH CITY OF KITCHENER STRATEGIC PLAN: Theme: Financial Management Strategic Direction: Ensure responsible use of public funds within a supportive policy framework. The City of Kitchener’s purchasing policies and practices ensure openness, fairness and transparency in the procurement of goods and services. ï ·÷ ó ì FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Estimated Cost for Rockway Feasibility Study Expression of Interest E11-084 costs, including HST 39,731 Less: HST rebate on tender (3,952) Net Cost Being Awarded 35,779 A Costs Incurred to Date - Projected Costs to Complete Study - Total Estimated Cost 35,779C Budget for Rockway Feasibility Study City of Kitchener 39,780 Total Budget 39,780 B Estimated Surplus/(Deficit) (B - C) 4,001D Funding is provided from the Feasibility Studies capital account. Surplus funds are to remain in the account to fund future studies. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: Not applicable. ACKNOWLEDGED BY: Dan Chapman, Deputy CAO & City Treasurer, Finance and Corporate Services ï ·÷ ó ë