Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-02-27COMMUNITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 27, 2012 CITY OF KITCHENER The Community and Infrastructure Services Committee met this date, commencing at 4:10 p.m. Present: Councillor K. Galloway - Chair Councillors J. Gazzola, D. Glenn-Graham, B. Ioannidis, Z. Janecki, Y. Fernandes, S. Davey, F. Etherington, B. Vrbanovic and P. Singh. Staff: J. Willmer, Deputy CAO, Community Services P. Houston, Deputy CAO, Infrastructure Services D. Chapman, Deputy CAO, Finance & Corporate Services L. Johnson, Director of Communications & Customer Service R. Regier, Executive Director of Economic Development T. Beckett, Fire Chief J. McBride, Director of Transportation Services K. Kugler, Director of Enterprises J. Young, Manager of Special Events B. Cheyne, Supervisor of Athletics R. Schirm, Supervisor of Crossing Guards C. York, Arts Co-ordinator D. Saunderson, Committee Administrator CSD-12-033 - AFFILIATION OF KITCHENER-WATERLOO PREDATORS VOLLEYBALL 1. CLUB The Committee considered Community Services Department report CSD-12-033, dated February 15, 2012, regarding the Kitchener-Waterloo Predators Volleyball Club becoming an affiliated minor sport group within the City; and, having insurance coverage through the City’s Minor Sport Third Party Liability Insurance policy. Councillor J. Gazzola requested clarification on the Third Party Liability Insurance Policy and whether the Kitchener-Waterloo Volleyball Club has requested affiliation status with the City of Waterloo, or whether the City will be accepting the majority of the Club’s liability. He stated that of the 537 registered athletes, there are only 237 Kitchener residents that are enrolled in the program. Mr. B. Cheyne advised the Club has also sought affiliation status from the City of Waterloo. He indicated that staff have been in contact with the City of Waterloo and they will be recommending approval of a similar status with them. He stated there would be no greater risk to the City regarding liability as it is a shared responsibility across all municipalities with similar affiliation. Councillor S. Davey requested an amendment to the recommendation to approve the affiliation status for the Volleyball Club pending their ability to obtain similar status with the City of Waterloo. On motion by Councillor D. Glenn-Graham - it was resolved: “That subject to the approval of affiliation status with the City of Waterloo, the Kitchener Waterloo Predators Volleyball Club be approved, as an affiliated minor sport group with the City of Kitchener, pursuant to the City’s Minor Sport Affiliation policy; and further, That the Kitchener Waterloo Predators Volleyball Club be added as an insured group to the City of Kitchener’s Minor Sports third party liability insurance program.” CSD-12-025 - AMENDMENT TO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 711 (OPEN AIR BURNING) 2. The Committee considered Community Services Department report CSD-12-025, dated February 21, 2012, regarding an amendment to Chapter 711 (Open Air Burning) of the Municipal Code, to include a prohibition on outdoor burning during times when the Fire Chief has declared a ban on fires. COMMUNITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 27, 2012 - 13 - CITY OF KITCHENER CSD-12-025 - AMENDMENT TO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 711 (OPEN AIR BURNING) 2. (CONT’D) On motion by Councillor D. Glenn-Graham - it was resolved: “That a By-law be enacted to amend Chapter 711 (Open Air Burning) of the City of Kitchener Municipal Code with respect to prohibiting open air burning during periods when a fire ban is in effect.” INS-12-008 - CITY OF KITCHENER DOWNTOWN FLEXIBLE PARKING 3. Councillor B. Ioannidis declared a pecuniary interest and did not participate in any discussion or voting with respect to this matter, as he owns a property in the Downtown. The Committee considered Infrastructure Services Department report INS-12-008, dated February 21, 2012, regarding an amendment to the Uniform Traffic By-law for the on-street parking regulations on King Street between Benton Street and Francis Street. Councillor J. Gazzola requested clarification on whether the Kitchener Downtown Business Improvement Area (BIA) was contacted regarding the proposed amendments to the on-street parking regulations and whether they were in agreement to the changes. Mr. J. McBride indicated that the amendment to the Traffic By-Law is more housekeeping in nature to regulate the on-street parking established through the King Street re-design. He stated that construction is now complete and the By-law needs to be reflective of the parking that now exists. He further advised that the BIA was contacted and they are in agreement with the new regulations. On motion by Councillor D. Glenn-Graham - it was resolved: “That Schedules 1, 2 (Downtown Core), 5 and 24 of the City of Kitchener Uniform Traffic By-Law No. 2007-138 be amended as outlined in Appendix B to Infrastructure Services Department report INS-12-008; and further, That the Uniform Traffic By-law be amended accordingly.” INS-12-021 - ON-STREET PARKING REGULATIONS 4. - BELMONT VILLAGE The Committee considered Infrastructure Services Department report INS-12-021, dated February 21, 2012, regarding an amendment of the Uniform Traffic By-law for the on-street parking regulations (i.e time limits) within Belmont Village. On motion by Councillor D. Glenn-Graham - it was resolved: “That on-street parking be permitted in the Belmont Village area for two (2) consecutive hours on the following roadways: Belmont Avenue West (South Side) • From a point 47 meters east of Union Street to a point 53 meters east thereof; • From a point 10 meters east of Argyle Street to a point 65 meters east thereof; • From a point 10 meters east of Claremont Avenue to a point 62 meters east thereof; Belmont Avenue West (North Side) • From a point 55 meters west of Glasgow Street to a point 17 meters west thereof; • From a point 51 meters west of Belmont Lane East to a point 34 meters west thereof; • From a point 12 meters east of Claremont Avenue to a point 38 meters east thereof; • From a point 17 meters west of Claremont Avenue to a point 5.5 meters west thereof; COMMUNITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 27, 2012 - 14 - CITY OF KITCHENER INS-12-021 - ON-STREET PARKING REGULATIONS 4. - BELMONT VILLAGE (CONT’D) • From a point 55 meters east of Belmont Lane East to a point 46 meters east thereof; • From a point 12 meters east of Belmont Lane East to a point 18 meters east thereof; Claremont Avenue (West Side) • From a point 10 meters south of Belmont Avenue West to Belmont Lane West; Rock Avenue (East Side) • From a point 11 meters south of Belmont Avenue West to a point 18 meters south thereof; and further, That the Uniform Traffic By-law be amended accordingly.” CSD-12-032 - 2012 TIER 2 COMMUNITY GRANTS FUNDING 5. The Committee considered Community Services Department report CSD-12-032, dated February 15, 2012, in which staff recommend the awarding of Tier 2 grants for 2012. The report contains background information noting that the groups recommended for funding will align with the community’s overall goals and the City’s strategic priorities. Ms. K. Woodcock and Ms. R. Willms presented the report. Ms. Woodcock further advised that 2 delegations were registered to attend this meeting; however, the representative from the Cherry Park Neighbourhood Association was unable to attend this date. Mr. Scott Piatkowski, Tier 2 Grant Peer Review Committee member, advised that the Community Grants are subject to a three stage evaluation process: stage 1 includes a basic review of the applications in comparison to the primary grant criteria; stage 2 includes a review of the proceeding applications against the secondary grant criteria; and, stage 3 includes a full review by the Peer and Staff Review Committee using the guiding principles to determine the recommended grant allocations. He stated that this year’s budget for the 2012 Tier 2 grants totalled $134,216. He indicated that the Review Committee is recommending the total allocation of $132,328. be granted, leaving an unallocated balance of $1,888. Ms. J. Lee and Ms. L. Jack Brauweiler, Kitchener-Waterloo Poetry Slam were in attendance in support of staff’s grant recommendation. Ms. Lee noted that their next Poetry Slam event would be held on March 30, 2012 and invited all members of Council to attend. On motion by Councillor Y. Fernandes - it was resolved: “That a 2012 Community Grant Tier 2 in the amount of $2,860. for the Kitchener- Waterloo Poetry Slam be approved.” Councillor J. Gazzola requested clarification on the Tier 2 Community Grant budget noting that Appendix B indicates that in 2011 the City approved $91,679. in Community Grants and in 2012 the proposed recommendation is considerably higher at an amount of $132,328. Ms. R. Willms stated that the 2011 total noted in Appendix B does not represent the total 2011 grants approved as not all groups re-apply each year. Often groups receive a Tier 2 Community Grant for a one-time special event. She indicated that the chart reflects groups that applied received funding in 2011 who have applied again in 2012 as well as new groups applying for the first time. She noted that the total budget for 2011 was approximately $144,000.; which was ultimately overspent due to appeals that Council approved for funding. In response to questions, Ms. Willms advised that the number of applications received for 2012 was relatively average. She stated that in 2011 the grant funding requests totalled approximately $450,000.; whereas the grant requests for 2012 totalled approximately $300,000. Councillor Gazzola questioned the recommendation for the eyeGO to the Arts community group and whether their Tier 2 funding would be similar in nature to the Tier 1 funding they already receive. Ms. Willms advised that eyeGO to the Arts requested a Tier 2 grant to host a COMMUNITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 27, 2012 - 15 - CITY OF KITCHENER CSD-12-032 - 2012 TIER 2 COMMUNITY GRANTS FUNDING (CONT’D) 5. th special event in conjunction with the City’s 100 anniversary. Councillor Gazzola questioned th whether their event could be funded through the City’s 100 anniversary budget allocation. In response, Ms. Willms stated that it was likely a timing issue as the group would not have been aware of the 100th anniversary grant opportunities prior to the 2012 Tier 2 grant deadline. Councillor Gazzola questioned the recommendation for the Kitchener Downtown Business Improvement Area (BIA) grant for their Canada Day celebration. He questioned whether the Canada Day event could be an additional special event that the City could partner in. Mr. J. Young advised that the BIA plans on hosting a Canada Day event; it may be a special event the City would like to participate in, but we are not interested in partnering with them as an event host at this time. Councillor Gazzola questioned why the Grand Philharmonic Choir was recommended for a 2012 Community Grant for an event that was occurring in 2013. Ms. Willms stated that groups are permitted to apply for events that occur early in the following year. In response to questions regarding the grant funding recommended for the Strong Start, Ms. Woodcock advised that they are a not-for-profit group that offers programs through educational facilities; however, the Review Committee felt that their programs were additional educational opportunities that are not being achieved through the local school boards. Councillor Gazzola requested clarification on the eligibility criteria and whether consideration had been given to the Steckle Heritage Farm and whether providing them with a grant was in turn, allowing them to hand out grants to the community by hosting free Family Sundays. Ms. Willms indicated that the recommendation is for an ‘in kind’ grant to cover the cost of their ads in the Kitchener Leisure Magazine. Councillor F. Etherington questioned why the Kitchener-Waterloo Art Gallery was recommended for refusal. In response to questions, Ms. Willms advised that, for Tier 1 grant organizations, Tier 2 grants are meant as a one-time funding source. The Grant Review Committee determined that the request appeared to be for operating funds and therefore did not meet the criteria. She stated that the Committee also felt, as the organization receives funding through the Tier 1 grant process and the arts and culture sustainability fund, if there were additional funding opportunities available to them, that their request was of a lower priority in comparison to some of the other grant requests. Councillor Etherington further advised that the delegation from Cherry Park Neighbourhood Association was not able to attend this meeting and has asked that consideration of their application be deferred to the March 5, 2012 Council meeting at which time she can attend. Councillor S. Davey questioned when the grant process for 2013 would begin and how the budget for the grant program is allocated. Mr. D. Chapman advised that Council Policy I-525 (Community Investment Policy) has an established formula to determine the budget allotment for the Community Grant program. Ms. Willms noted that the grants are advertised annually around August / September with an anticipated application deadline of early November. Councillor Y. Fernandes requested clarification on the grant recommendation for Inter Arts Matrix. She stated that the group intends on using the funds for operating which would potentially mean that they would require more than a one-time funding source. Ms. Willms stated that groups may request a Tier 2 Grant for operating funds, and noted that any group that is recommended for a Tier 2 Grant for 5 consecutive years would then be eligible for funding through the Tier 1 Grant process. Councillor Fernandes stated that groups requesting funds for operating should be encouraged to seek a more sustainable funding source. Councillor Fernandes also referred to Strong Start, stating that groups providing educational programs through the local schools should be encouraged to seek partnerships with the School Board rather than requesting grant funding through the City.She requested further clarification on the Waterloo County Rugby Football Club and whether their request was meant to establish rugby programs in the local schools. Mr. B. Cheyne advised that the Club intends on using their funding to establish a marketing campaign within the local schools to encourage COMMUNITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 27, 2012 - 16 - CITY OF KITCHENER CSD-12-032 - 2012 TIER 2 COMMUNITY GRANTS FUNDING (CONT’D) 5. participation. Councillor Fernandes questioned whether there were more appropriate funding sources through provincial programs; such as, “participaction” for funding of this nature. In response, Mr. Cheyne advised that there are additional grant opportunities for sporting groups to assist with promoting their programs; however, the Rugby Club missed their opportunity to apply for other potential funding options, and chose to apply for a Community Grant as an alternative. Councillor Fernandes questioned why the Rugby Club was only recommended for one of their requested grants. Ms. Willms stated that the grant request that was refused was for operating costs and the Committee felt that they had a surplus of funds to meet their operating needs. She indicated that the recommended grant is for a special program that could not be accommodated through their operating funds. Councillor K. Galloway questioned whether the City had a method in place to recall the approved funding if the Waterloo County Rugby Football Club was not able to implement their promotional program within the local schools. Mr. Cheyne advised the Rugby Club has already established their required partnerships to implement their marketing program. On motion by Councillor F. Etherington - it was resolved: “That consideration of a 2012 Community Tier 2 grant for the Cherry Park Neighbourhood Association (Cherry Festival) in the amount of $7,000., as outlined in be referred to the Appendix B to Community Services Department report CSD-12-032, March 5, 2012 Council meeting to allow opportunity for a representative of the Association to speak to their grant request.” On motion by Councillor B. Vrbanovic, the balance of the 2012 Tier 2 Community Grants were brought forward for consideration. Councillor J. Gazzola requested that the grant for the Waterloo County Rugby Football Club for the implementation of a youth development program in physical education classes throughout local elementary and high schools, be dealt with separately. On motion by Councillor B. Vrbanovic - it was resolved: “That a 2012 Community Grant Tier 2 in the amount of $4,352. ($4,000. cash; $352. in kind) for the Waterloo County Rugby Football Club be approved.” On motion by Councillor B. Vrbanovic - it was resolved: “That the balance of the 2012 Community Grants Tier 2 in the amount of $118,116. be approved as outlined in Appendix B to Community Services Department report CSD-12- 032.” INS-12-011 - CYCLING ADVISORY COMMITTEE 2012 PRIORITIES 6. The Committee considered Infrastructure Services Department report INS-12-011, dated February 15, 2012, regarding the Cycling Advisory Committee’s 2012 Priorities. Ms. M. Sahl, Chair, Cycling Advisory Committee presented an overview of the Committee’s activities outlining: the Committee’s mandate; their previous accomplishments; and, their top five priorities for 2012. She advised that one of their initiatives in 2011 was surveying the members of Council to help determine the Committee’s overall expectations going forward. She indicated that three things were clearly identified: Council believe that both cyclists and motorists require more education on sharing the road and providing a safe environment; they were interested in hearing updates from the Committee once or twice yearly; and, several Councillor’s see the Committee’s primary function to advocate for the implementation of the Cycling Master Plan. In addition, Ms. Sahl further advised that through the survey the majority of Council also showed interest in participating in a community ride with the members of the COMMUNITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 27, 2012 - 17 - CITY OF KITCHENER INS-12-011 - CYCLING ADVISORY COMMITTEE 2012 PRIORITIES (CONT’D) 6. Cycling Advisory Committee. She stated that the Committee has proposed a “Councillors’ Ride”; which will provide a greater understanding of what the City looks like through the eyes of a cyclist. She stated that the ride is currently being proposed for May or June 2012. Councillor J. Gazzola commended the Committee on their accomplishments and questioned whether their top 5 priorities would likely be accomplished in 2012. Mr. R. Schirm advised that the Iron Horse Trail Railway Crossing; the CMP Sign Project: Victoria Park to Highway 401; and, the Wilson Avenue Primary Commuter Trail Link Repairs, have already been schedule for work anticipated to begin in Spring 2012. Councillor F. Etherington questioned whether the proposed changes for Iron Horse Trail Railway Crossing were definitely going ahead in Spring 2012. Mr. Schirm stated that the project is currently in its final design stages and budget consideration, and the work is anticipated to be completed sometime this year. Councillor B. Ioannidis questioned whether there will be an improved cycling connection on Margaret Avenue between Kitchener and Waterloo. Mr. Schirm advised that the Regional Cycling Route maps identify connectivity issues and the Committee has proposed to put up signs in that area to help improve the linkages in that area. CAO-12-007 - BELMONT AVENUE PUBLIC ART 7. The Committee considered Chief Administrator’s Office report CAO-12-007, dated February 10, 2012, regarding the installation of a public art piece on Belmont Avenue as part of the streetscape reconstruction. Ms. C. York reviewed the report. Councillor J. Gazzola questioned why the reconstruction project on Belmont Avenue was eligible for a 1% budget allocation for the commission and installation of public art and whether there was a public art component for the King Street streetscape project.Ms. C. York stated that the King Street reconstruction project also had a public art component; the art piece was selected through a similar process; and, has been installed at Speakers Corner, on the corner of Frederick Street and Benton Street. Councillor F. Etherington requested further clarification as to why the Park Street reconstruction project did not receive a public art budget allocation. Mr. J. Willmer advised that the Belmont Avenue project involved substantial improvement to the streetscape; whereas, the Park Street reconstruction project had no streetscape improvements, remaining basically as it existed. He advised that any time a construction project is a streetscape redesign a 1% budget allocation is established for the installation of public art. On motion by Councillor Z. Janecki - it was resolved: “That the commission and installation of an outdoor wall mural (untitled) at 696 Belmont Avenue West be approved; and, That the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute an agreement, satisfactory to the City Solicitor, with Larry Hunter outlining the obligations of the public art commission; and further, That the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute an agreement, satisfactory to the City Solicitor, with the owner of the building at 696 Belmont Avenue West regarding the installation of the mural panels on the building wall.” CSD-12-024 - GOLF OPERATIONS REVIEW 8. The Committee considered Community Services Department report CSD-12-024, dated February 21, 2012, regarding an operational review of the golf enterprise to determine whether financial or operational improvements can be achieved. Councillor J. Gazzola questioned whether the proposed three week timeline was long enough COMMUNITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 27, 2012 - 18 - CITY OF KITCHENER CSD-12-024 - GOLF OPERATIONS REVIEW (CONT’D) 8. to engage the public and report back to the March 19, 2012 Committee meeting and whether staff were trying to achieve any of the proposed initiatives within the report for the 2012 golf season. Ms. K. Kugler advised that staff have already started to engage the public by collecting contact information from people interested in staying informed about any proposed changes to the golf enterprise. She stated that although the public consultation timeline is short, staff has proposed a significant online communication strategy; as well as, a public open house to seek the majority of their feedback. Councillor Y. Fernandes agreed that the public engagement timeline is short and many of the City’s regular golfers maybe out of the country for the winter months. Councillor Z. Janecki questioned whether there was the potential to extend the public engagement process by another month and have staff report back to the Committee at the April Standing Committee. Councillor K. Galloway pointed out that that this would result in a one month delay. Ms. Kugler advised that a one month deferral would be problematic in terms of being able to plan for implementation of the proposed recommendations. She stated staff will be starting to develop their 2013 budgets in June 2012 and anticipate that implementation of the proposed recommendations will have budget implications. Accordingly the proposed deferral may impact the 2013 golf season. Councillor D. Glenn-Graham advised that the executive summary within the report was quite extensive and there are a number of positive suggestions that have been identified. He stated that he was in support of the proposed recommendations, including the reporting date of March 19, 2012. Councillor S. Davey requested clarification as to whether all of the proposed recommendations were anticipated for 2013 or whether staff were considering implementing any of the proposed changes for the 2012 golf season. He stated, in his opinion, there were a number of initiatives that were straight forward and could potentially be achieved this year. Ms. Kugler advised that the larger recommendations deal specifically with the operating model and are anticipated for the 2013 golf season; she agreed that there are a number of smaller initiatives that could potentially be achieved for the 2012 golf season. On motion by Councillor J. Gazzola - it was resolved: “That the NGF Consulting Operations Report attached as Appendix ‘1’ to Community Services Department report CSD-12-024 (February 21, 2012), be tabled; and, That staff be directed to engage the community, including one public open house to review the recommendations and operating models for the City’s golf courses; and further, That staff be directed to report back to the March 19, 2012 Community & Infrastructure Services Committee meeting with the results of the public feedback and recommendations on the proposed operating model for the future for the City’s golf courses. ” CSD-12-028 - TOWNSHIP OF WOOLWICH 9. CSD-12-029 - TOWNSHIP OF WELLESLEY CSD-12-030 - CITY OF WATERLOO - FIRE DISPATCH SERVICE AGREEMENT(S) The Committee considered Community Services Department reports CSD-12-028, CSD-12- 029 and CSD-12-030, dated February 7, 2012, regarding Fire Dispatch Service Agreements for the Townships of Woolwich and Wellesley and the City of Waterloo. In response to questions, Chief T. Beckett advised that Fire currently has contracts in place with the Townships of Woolwich and Wellesley and the City of Waterloo for fire dispatching services. He advised that the agreements expire in 2012 and staff have negotiated new COMMUNITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 27, 2012 - 19 - CITY OF KITCHENER CSD-12-028 - TOWNSHIP OF WOOLWICH 9. CSD-12-029 - TOWNSHIP OF WELLESLEY CSD-12-030 - CITY OF WATERLOO - FIRE DISPATCH SERVICE AGREEMENT(S) (CONT’D) contracts with a formula to better reflect a per-call rate vs. the current rate. He stated that the new formula will take into consideration the actual cost for fire communications. Councillor Gazzola questioned what the City of Waterloo should currently be paying for the use of Kitchener’s Fire communications. In response to questions, Chief Beckett advised that currently the City of Waterloo pays $244,000. with an annual increase of 3%. He indicated that with the per-call rate formula the City of Waterloo would be paying approximately $307,000. Councillor Z. Janecki questioned why the Township of Woolwich was being recommended for a 3 year agreement, when the Township of Wellesley and the City of Waterloo were being recommended for 5 year agreements. Chief Beckett advised that through the contract negotiations Woolwich preferred a 3-year term. Councillor Janecki requested further clarification on how long it has been since the City has negotiated a new service contract with the City of Waterloo. He indicated that the Woolwich and Wellesley are renewals of a previous 2 year agreement. Chief Beckett advised that the City has been trying to implement a new agreement with Waterloo since 2002. He stated that there have been significant management changes in Kitchener and in Waterloo and that has delayed negotiation of a new agreement. In response to questions, Chief Beckett stated for clarification Kitchener Fire does not provide fire services to the Townships or the City of Waterloo, rather the agreements are strictly for fire communication. Councillor Gazzola requested that staff provide a financial summary report for the dispatch operations provided to the two Townships and the City of Waterloo over the past three years. Carried The following motion was then voted on by a recorded vote and , with Councillors D. Glenn-Graham, Y. Fernandes, K. Galloway, S. Davey, Z. Janecki, B. Vrbanovic, B. Ioannidis, F. Etherington voting in favour; and, Councillor J. Gazzola voting in opposition. Mayor C. Zehr and Councillor P. Singh were absent and accordingly did not vote. On motion by Councillor B. Vrbanovic - it was resolved: “That the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute an agreement with the Corporation of the Township of Woolwich to provide fire dispatch service to Woolwich for a term of three (3) years commencing January 1, 2012, said agreement to be satisfactory to the City Solicitor.” - and - “ That the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute an agreement with the Corporation of the Township of Wellesley to provide fire dispatch service to Wellesley for a term of five (5) years commencing January 1, 2012, said agreement to be satisfactory to the City Solicitor.” - and - “That the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute an agreement with the Corporation of the City of Waterloo to provide fire dispatch service to Waterloo for a term of five (5) years commencing January 1, 2012, said agreement to be satisfactory to the City Solicitor.” COMMUNITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 27, 2012 - 20 - CITY OF KITCHENER ADJOURNMENT 10. On motion, the meeting adjourned at 5:45 p.m. Dianna Saunderson Committee Administrator