Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCSD-12-083 - Demolition Control Application - 504 Krug StStaff Re apt K[T(~;HEI~T~,R Communr'ty SerucPS Department www.kitchenertu REPORT TO: DATE OF MEETING: SUBMITTED BY: PREPARED BY: WARD(S) INVOLVED: DATE OF REPORT: REPORT NO.: SUBJECT: Community & Infrastructure Services Committee June 18, 2012 Alain Pinard, Director of Planning Mat Vaughan, Planning Technician (519) 741-3400 x 3176 Ward 1 May 28, 2012 CSD-12-083 DEMOLITION CONTROL APPLICATION DC12/13/K/ATP 504 KRUG STREET ANA DASILVA au ~ ~~' 1 Irl r 7+Op 91( ~~~ 1U5 ~~ '+L~1~ ,~~`' 1't0 f .r''`~1(l t r t U B .r'? a ~ ,. tz v ~}~R+4tJ ~ RECOMMENDATION: 4Cf3 5,3 U ~ ~ ~~, ~~ i `x~ 52(1 'fit 3t 4 -°' C~ 540 cc~-c .+v ",.t ~~ 70~ +~7 D ~ ~ ra Subject Lands 01. t~ ~~~~~~ 7!]}~ M Location Map: 504 Krug Street ~T J W 3fi; 7 /?0. ~~ 1) That Demolition Control Application DC12/13/K/ATP requesting permission to demolish one (1) single detached dwelling located at 504 Krug St, owned by Ana DaSilva, be approved with the following condition: The Chief Building Official may authorize and issue a demolition permit under Section 33(6) of the Planning Act subject to the following condition: 1- 1 In the event that construction of the new dwelling unit is not substantially complete within two years from the day demolition of the existing residential property is commenced, the City Clerk may enter on the collector's roll, to be collected in like manner as municipal taxes, $20,000 for each dwelling unit contained in the residential properties in respect of which the demolition permit is issued and such sum shall, until the payment thereof, be a lien or charge upon the land in respect of which the permit to demolish the residential property is issued. REPORT: The Community Services Department has received an application requesting the demolition of a single detached dwelling located at 504 Krug Street. The subject property is zoned Residential Six Zone (R-6) in the Zoning By-law and designated Low Density Commercial Residential in the City's Official Plan. The Owner is requesting permission to demolish the existing dwelling in order to allow for the development of a new singled detached dwelling. Since the Owner is proposing new residential development on the site, a neighbourhood circulation is not required. In order to ensure that redevelopment of the site occurs in a timely manner, staff are recommending a condition as permitted by the Planning Act. The demolition permit would set out the condition imposing a fine of $20,000 for each dwelling unit if redevelopment is not substantially complete within two years after the demolition permit has been issued. Photograph 1: Existing building proposed for demolition Circulation Comments: Planning staff circulated the application to internal departments. Their comments are attached as Appendix "B". 1-2 M_ ~; ~ - -~-~~ W _ ~` Planning Analysis: Staff have taken all internal agency comments (see Appendix B) into consideration and have no concerns with the proposed demolition. Staff are of the opinion that the proposed demolition will have minimal impact on the adjacent lands and the overall neighbourhood. The proposed demolition will permit development that will replace the existing dwelling resulting in no net loss to Kitchener's housing stock. The proposed development will also be compatible with the surrounding neighbourhood. The proposed demolition and redevelopment is required in order to remediate an existing soil contamination issue. The existing dwelling needs to be removed to clean up the site appropriately. The immediate surrounding neighbourhood consists of a mix of single detached dwellings, and low-rise apartment dwellings. The redevelopment of the site with the proposed single detached dwelling is consistent with the intent of the Low Rise Residential designation in the Official Plan and is a permitted use under the Residential Six (R-6) zone. ALIGNMENT WITH CITY OF KITCHENER STRATEGIC PLAN: The proposed demolition is required prior to the redevelopment of the subject site and will align with the Kitchener Strategic Plan as it ensures the implementation of the community priority Development with appropriate redevelopment that is consistent with Provincial, Regional and City planning policies. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: No new or additional capital budget requests are expected with this recommendation. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: An information letter will be circulated to all property owners within 60 metres of the subject property in advance of the Community and Infrastructure Services Committee Meeting dealing with the subject application. CONCLUSION: Planning staff are satisfied that the proposed demolition is justified as the Owner intends to rebuild a new single detached dwelling and remediate an existing soil contamination issue. As such, staff recommends that Demolition Control Application DC12/13/K/ATP, requesting to demolish the existing single detached dwelling, be approved subject to the condition outlined in the recommendation of this report. REVIEWED BY: Della Ross, Manager of Development Review ACKNOWLEDGED BY: Jeff Willmer, Chief Administrative Officer List of Attachments: • Appendix A -Demolition Plan • Appendix B -Internal agency comments 1-3 ~, ~ , „ ~ , t D.2: N 5oe55' ~s~ E I a D. 5 °- V W ~ 0.~ ~ ~~ $i q~ ~B ~ i \ 9 \ ~ m 8. ¢Y SW 0. O°t' °y0 ~ 33 STONE m° 't ~ RETAIN. Q; ~°'. ® s9, /e 90 C~~ ~°j jl P/S a WAIL 0° ` ~ SS O \ ~ ~ 'rl ` ~~ . JA ® o ~° x 0. 30 y/S 0~ 9 E.,fl d a 99 $0 ~~, 0.97 n~ 9s ~ 0.36° ~ ~p ~ ~ 0. 48 °- d ~~ ~ 99 1 j 2^ EXISTING HOUSE f J % {~ ~l l~~ 9e ~ `~' eT0 8E DEA7OLISNEO° / ~ q°+'~}~99 qi ~` U00. 42I (100. 2t 4T` -O' ~ d ,~ 1 i8. 325 .30 1.245 in z a ~i~0.65! ~' ~ o O N {\ 0 STOOP 9 °' ova OO ~ ~ ~ T, 4 ~q 9 \ ~ ~ ~' ~ 0 ~ 90 ~ ` FOUNOAT IOH 1.295 . 24' (300.32} `gq 9 g9 9g Z Q / ~' ~9- ~, % ~v ~ `~i' ? 1 ' , r my a /~ s3 n , o a. +i a I ~ 1 `~' +r a ` ~ mry ~ ~ I ~ n ( o,,~' 9° 9 ~ ~ o ~ ( c I a I 9s- >8 /°~ in '°' o a~~ I a rc ~ I d3 l a I ~~~' ~~ ti lFX~ 9y r, s ,~, g ,,• q-~ -t" DENeH NARK ~M3 i `q O G. s ge O~Q 6'ZZ ® ELEV. IN PO~LEW sg ~~ "~9 ~ ~ 0 2't^ tas9uuED) e8 A o ~'S~ ;q1 ®°' 2 ~~ 2. q' \ ClQ y `~~ \` N ~ P ~~ SYO~ E'1-~SS`~G 100.00 EXISTING GRADE (100.00) PROPOSED GRADE p/S PIAST IC SHED ~~ Fa/S ° METAL SHED ~0 U/p ° UTILITY POLE &,l` WBF WQOD 60AR0 FENCE TM TOP OF WALL T'N!S !S N®T A PLAN ®P SURVEY JOHN SCHNARR APRIL 18, 2012 JOB N0. TOP OF FNDN. = 100. 5Y 71-48(30) BTMA. OF FTGS. = 100.57 - t8'-4"l = 58:03 6UENTHER RUES SURVEYING LIMITED © KITCHENER, ONTAft 10 1-4 ,,_. L~~ ~3 ~ ~~ ~~ s9 ~~.5 ~ ~~~ .~ j il ~~.+ 1 ~s~ Y s m Q ~ ~ o ~ ~ u C O U Q. ~ c 4 c O Q C ~ ~ ~ D OJ ~ 4 V ~ ~ v ~ t*J m N C p ~ _ 4 ~ N C ~ O 6! N ~ ~ S D ~ o o >. c s - ~ U v ~' in v c s m ~ ~ O c ~ ~ o X A ~ O ~ QI ' ~ a 7 c m ~ ~' a ' ~ c ~ ;, ~ ' W ~ ~ J 4 N O - ~ ~ '. ro ~ . ~ v a u C . ~_ a ~ ~ a o 46. lfl F ii ~ 'Y U to 6 ~ u a w U O a m Y v 0 u~ c 0 U Q Q Q O C O U c 0 0 E Q O V ~ O 0 N ~ O N N ~ ~ O ~ ` V _ C Y ~ c U U N T ~ D ~ ~ C ~ N N f=6 O C ~ N. C ~ C t9 ro ~ a a U_ >~ ~ ~ } ~ ~ ~ f6 ~ ~ w .. d N dl .p.~ !. E G .~ = L c~ '; ~ a O O O V LL. (~ F GY z ~ N_ O ~a x 1-5 6I J ~ '`'~ ll :I .~ x '~~ -~ z a,;? ~~~ ~~~_ "` U c N ~ ~ ~~~~ U ~ O N Y ~C Z Oj,Y UO Q. • U °o a~ N b ~0 U Y U ~~ Z=> ~~ ~ .1ao° i'".~ ~ 0 c O U 0 N_ C ~ ~ ~ x U L m (~ N O) ~ r ~ O ~ `o Y > d. m ~ ~ ~ ~ h- ° O ® F® 6~- U U E C ~ ~ C N ~ E m N ~ o O c ~ O p _ ~ N ~ ~ t T -p t6 ~ ~ O U ~ ON C O ~ C ~ N G O C N O 3 O E `~ O a ~, a . o E c u :°. o m m o uCi ~ ~ ~ ~ N a N 0 N O ~ ~ T ~ ~ N EO L *' m m m ~ E ~ 3 ~O o x c 3 N ~ o ~ L N c. 3 ~ (0 E ~. 3 m ~~ E ~ L ~ N N U O ' 3 0 Z c s L N O a o T U ~ U1 A U N E m C~ C o E o ~ . ~ A c6 N t4 9 O 'O C R ti - N ~ ~- ` ~ ~ N ~ 6f O f0 Q ~ LP ~ C o ~ o ~i-~-cnv.~ c pu>a° ~ N o ~ e ~+ O e e ® ~ O G ~- ~ _ CO '~ 5t1 CO C .~ 0 ~° U N L. C O . U a N d a> b G o C (n 3 J ~ ~ _ ~p x o ~ U m ~ > K ro - Y ,°2y y, U O ct ~ ~ W ~ ~n -~ -cs a~ v ~ n :v v H ~ ~ 'ti E °' > ~ cf Q }° lL U N U 3 c 4, N O C °C~, O O. ~ ~ •J N m .a ~ ~ C Y ti O ~ G .c m •^ ~ ~ -d w 0 0 ~ U c U ~ c6 U d UR. V' .U V T O ~ ~ N N N fl' V C O, vi ~ O ~ h U sN., v ~y ~ w ~'y v a~ ~ ;~ .~ ~~ p~ ~ ~ N ~ N o ~ o o .~ •~ ,b '~ U Uti ~ 6' '.-y' ate, .~ ~ ti ~ b O :o ~ A .~~~~o 3 .° ~ o ~ °' b o ti ~ ~> av'i w r~,1 (--~ ~ O v, s0. C N a O A U ~ ~ N O ~ O D- m ~ C ry m ~ ~ p c ro t6 a o .% d U ~ ~ ~ N ~ O T._ rn c ~ ~ . C C N E o ID U O N U m O ro n c c_ N x N ?' U O ~ ~ C ro ,o O ~ 3 3 U W Z Z y o 0 W 3 c T N O ti O U Cam., ~` 3 cco b '~ E ,O O .~ ~ w ~ O T ~ y a ~, U ~ O U '~~ ° o 0 N C v ~ o ~ C ~ ~ ~ C O N O ~' C N U -p N N ~ C u. i .c°. ~ c ~ w .. o w o o m a E mop °~ ~ 3 N O ~ p ~ N~ O N O C O C ~ Q ~ N O N C p - O '`o m L C o°SDT~°E Ol C N > C oSIIOiv m E __ c ~ O, LW ~ (0 L - 0 o w o m m o ti c ~ a~ m L `° °o ° E N L C N ~ ~ C A N (6 fl- N C o N d }j N~ a 9 N J~ p L O G ` U N O p Y (9 0 C ~j., ULi Nd ~Sw2 .~ ® • o e • e G W ~'. O ~ N ~..~ ~ o ~o °~ ~ o 'r -o a "J O ~1 C U C ~ o ~ ro J c ~ o U cYJ a 0 3 m - c O N U ro~ C ~ N fl ~ N `~ a a c c m N N a ar 0 3 m c°' T O ~ G ~ O ~ E ~° o m w p Q 9 O ~ N N (0 N m ~ N a `m ~ N C 0 m N o ~ N C U O ?i ~ d L O N N N N C ® IL- t=- O A ~ e ro N. ~~~,~~_ 'c~~ as m n F C N Y c u rj ~~a m °' _ ~ L 3 c C N ~ O O1 C N ~ T O `U W t N n ~ ~ O ~ ~ m c c~ m m c L L N ~ N C OC E~a~ N O ~ ~ ' C ~ ~ ~ad O ~ Qj o m s ~ N c ~ c 0 U L O `c me ~ N C O O ~ .N ~ N ~~EE L~ N 61 O L D c C °' N. ~ ro ~ ~ Y 7 O ~ O o E N E L ® t9 U ~ ~ o ~ ~ C y a o ° UO ( ~ ~ M N n ~ ~°` ~ v e O ro ~ C O _ o~OC~ C ~ O m'a C O O >+ ~ N ~ ~ j C CD ~ ~ L~ ~C S O U N O a `Q U N ~ m m ~o a N C> C N > c i J ui H U ~ ~ m c~ ~ eD [:] W 1-6 N M