HomeMy WebLinkAboutCAO-13-016 - OLG Casino Modernization - Kitchener as Potential Host Municipality
REPORT TO:
Council
DATE OF MEETING:
May 13, 2013
SUBMITTED BY:
Jeff Willmer, CAO, 519-741-2200 x7350
PREPARED BY: Jeff Willmer, CAO, 519-741-2200 x7350
WARD(S) INVOLVED:
all
DATE OF REPORT:
May 8, 2013
REPORT NO.: CAO-13-016
SUBJECT: Ontario Lottery & Gaming Commission
Casino Modernization in Zone SW#1
Kitchener as Potential Host Municipality
RECOMMENDATION:
1. WHEREAS the results of the community engagement showed strong opposition to
an Ontario Lottery & Gaming Corporation facility (casino) being located within the
City of Kitchener;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the OLG be advised that the City of Kitchener
has completed its community engagement process and is not willing to host a
casino.
- and -
2. WHEREAS a casino in the Township of Woolwich is expected to have a significant
negative social and economic impact on the Kitchener community as well as the
overall regional community;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Township of Woolwich be requested to
reconsider its willingness to host an OLG gaming facility.
- and -
3. WHEREAS the social and economic effects of the OLG’s modernization strategy
to increase ease of access to urban casinos affects communities on a regional
scale; and,
WHEREAS the consultation process prescribed in provincial legislation requires
the agreement of only a lower tier municipality in a two tier municipal government;
7 (a) - 1
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Province of Ontario and the OLG be
requested to cease the current RFPQ and operator selection process in Gaming
Zone SW1 to allow it to be amended to require the agreement of the upper tier
municipality as well as a lower tier municipality;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of the resolutions resulting from Chief
Administrator’s Office report CAO-13-016, be circulated to the Premier of Ontario,
the Provincial Minister of Finance, the Members of Provincial Parliament as well
as the heads of all local and regional municipal councils in Gaming Zone SW1 and
the Chair of the OLG; and,
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Mayor be directed to request a meeting on this
matter with the Premier and the Minister of Finance.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Community input is overwhelmingly opposed to having a casino in Kitchener or in the
surrounding area. On that basis we are recommending that the City decline to host an OLG
casino and take steps to ensure that a casino does not establish nearby where the same
negative social and economic effects would be suffered by Kitchener and the regional
community.
BACKGROUND:
In the 1990s the provincial government legalized government-run casinos. At that time
Kitchener, Waterloo and Cambridge each declined to host a casino. Woolwich Township also
declined and subsequently Elmira’s harness racing track closed and Grand River Raceway &
Slots opened in Elora/Centre Wellington in 2003.
The Ontario Lottery & Gaming Corporation (OLG) announced its modernization strategy in
2011. The general intent is to move from slot machine gambling facilities at harness racing
tracks in rural areas to modernized casinos (including table games as well as slot machines) in
or near large urban areas. This is expected to increase ease of access to casinos by urban
populations and generate more revenue for OLG. New modernized casinos would be built and
operated by the private sector. OLG would share a percentage of the revenue from slot
machines with the host municipality.
Kitchener is within OLG’s Gaming Zone SW#1 (map attached as Appendix A). The current
process could result in either an expansion of Elora’s Grand River Raceway & Slots to become
the modernized casino for Zone SW#1or a new casino built elsewhere in the zone, provided the
local municipality has had a public consultation and passed a resolution confirming its
willingness to host.
Centre Wellington and Woolwich Townships have confirmed their willingness to host a casino.
Wilmot Township and the Cities of Cambridge and Waterloo have declined to host.
REPORT:
Options
7 (a) - 2
1. Declare Kitchener’s willingness to host a modernized OLG Casino and begin process of
establishing terms and conditions;
2. Declare that Kitchener is not willing to host a modernized OLG Casino;
3. Declare that Kitchener is not willing to host a modernized OLG Casino and take actions
toward preventing a new casino outside Kitchener but in such close proximity that
Kitchener would suffer the negative social and economic effects.
Results of Community Input
The community engagement process was discussed in general terms with City Council at its
March 25 meeting. The process is detailed later in this report under the heading “COMMUNITY
ENGAGEMENT”.
Town Hall meetings April 23 and April 30:
OLG representatives presented information at the beginning of the April 23 meeting. Twenty-
five members of the community spoke as delegations April 23 with a further twenty-one
speaking on April 30. The community input was overwhelmingly opposed to Kitchener being a
willing host.
Six delegations spoke in favour of hosting and/or proceeding to the next step of the process,
noting that such an action now would still allow for revoking support later in the process. Primary
economic benefits included municipal revenue stream, construction jobs, and ongoing jobs at
the casino.
Forty delegations spoke against. Primary themes included the negative social effects of
problem gambling, and the negative economic effects of the community’s spending being
redirected to OLG and away from existing entertainment businesses.
The minutes of both meetings are attached, providing more detail on each delegation and their
respective position and comments.
Advisory Committee Input
The Kitchener Youth Action Council appeared as a delegation at the April 23 public meeting.
They advised against a casino and emphasized the potential negative impact on students, who
are more likely to become problem gamblers, and concerns that a casino would normalize
gambling behaviour among the student population.
Three advisory committees appeared at a special meeting of City Council on May 6. Those
committees were: Compass Kitchener, Safe and Healthy Community Advisory Committee and
Economic Development Advisory Committee (EDAC).
Compass Kitchener advised that the City should decline the invitation to further discuss the
casino opportunity on the basis that it would conflict with the strategic directions of The City of
Kitchener Strategic Plan. (See also “ALIGNMENT WITH THE CITY OF KITCHENER
STRATEGIC PLAN” later in this report.)
7 (a) - 3
Safe & Healthy Community Advisory Committee advised Council to say “no” to the casino, or to
incorporate the crime prevention strategies previously brought forward by the Regional Crime
Prevention Council.
EDAC advised that more information is needed to evaluate the question and make an informed
decision. They recommended the City of Kitchener continue with the process in order to better
understand and assess risks and mitigate them.
City of Kitchener Survey Results
City staff engaged Environics to help phrase the survey questions and to complete an analysis
and summary of the survey results. The summary completed by Environics is attached. 2326
individuals completed this survey. 75% either strongly oppose (70%) or somewhat oppose (5%)
a new casino in Kitchener, whereas 24% either strongly support (18%) or somewhat support
(6%) this. 75% either strongly oppose (63%) or somewhat oppose (12%) a new casino in the
greater K-W region but outside Kitchener; whereas 17% either strongly support (7%) or
somewhat support (10%) this.
Based on the methodology used, where respondents are not randomly selected but make their
own choice on whether or not to participate, the City’s survey cannot be considered to be
statistically significant. However, based on the alignment of the demographic data provided by
respondents with the census data we are satisfied that it is representative of a cross section of
this community.
The number of surveys completed is far greater than other surveys conducted by the City in
recent years. Other recent surveys include the following:
Rockway Seniors’ Centre Feasibility Study: 650 responses
LEAF Fund 2012: 205 responses
Leisure Facilities Master Plan: 200 responses
2013 Budget: 14 responses
Concerns were raised that the survey required the name and address of the respondent. The
survey noted that this information is kept confidential. The reason that we required it was to
mitigate against the potential for “ballot box stuffing.” The survey was available both online as
well as using printed copies. The results were checked for duplication. Instances of duplication
were minimal and have been eliminated from the analysis.
A polling firm commissioned by Bingemans used a different methodology and completed a
survey of 502 Kitchener residents. Among its key findings were that 63% are “open to having a
conversation about potentially hosting a casino in Kitchener and what that might mean for the
city” as opposed to 35% who are “closed to the idea of having a casino in Kitchener and not
engage in any discussion about it”. 64% strongly agreed (22%) or somewhat agreed (41%) that
they want to learn more about various proposals that might come forward to building a casino in
the city whereas 35% either strongly disagreed (20%) or somewhat disagreed (15%).
7 (a) - 4
Community Input Independent of Survey
A summary of additional written submissions is attached as Appendix F. 148 were received,
with 10% supporting Kitchener as a host municipality, 81% opposed, and 9% other/undecided.
In addition the City received five petitions, all opposed to the proposal to host an OLG gaming
facility in Kitchener. Petitions were from:
Trinity United Church – 87 names
St. Andrew’s Presbyterian Church – 92 names
Kitchener Mennonite Brethren Church – 110 names
Salvation Army Kitchener Community Church – 50 names
Waterloo-Kitchener United Mennonite Church – 97 names
Summary
Based on the community input there is very strong support for Option 3. Not only is the
community opposed to a casino in Kitchener, it is opposed to a casino elsewhere in the area.
Very few at either of the town hall meetings or in written submissions supported the argument
that if a casino is coming to the K-W area anyway then Kitchener should receive the municipal
revenue and set the terms and conditions.
OLG Modernization Process
OLG’s process follows provincial legislation. In a two-tier municipal government only the lower
tier municipalities are consulted. This has had a “divide and conquer” effect, where a
municipality of 24,400 has stated its willingness to host despite no other municipality being
willing to host in this region with a population of 559,000.
It is understandable that a smaller lower-tier municipality would be attracted by the prospect of
millions of dollars in annual revenue. However, it is the upper tier that is responsible for social
services and public health, and the majority of the negative effects – both social and economic –
are felt by the region-wide community where the three cities represent over 86% of the regional
population.
The region-wide community is clearly opposed, but the process may result in a new casino
coming to the region in any case. This is contrary to the Province’s stated intent not to establish
a casino in a community that does not want one. The lack of alignment between this stated
intent and the possible outcome of the selection process leads to Option 3 being the most
logical outcome of Kitchener’s community engagement.
OLG’s process needs to be refined to better serve communities with 2-tier municipal
government. This should be done before a decision is made on a new casino within this gaming
zone.
Social and Economic Effects of a Casino
OLG acknowledges that in Ontario 1.2 to 3.4% of the population is predisposed to become
moderate to severe problem gamblers, and that a new casino built closer to the region’s
population centres is expected to cause an increase of problem gambling in this region.
7 (a) - 5
The negative effects of problem gambling apply not only to those individuals, but their families,
friends, employers and the community at large. This was made clear by delegations at the
second town hall meeting who described their own experiences as a recovering problem
gambler or as the spouse of a problem gambler. The dollar cost of problem gambling is difficult
to quantify; however, it is generally accepted that the negative effects of problem gambling go
well beyond mere dollar costs.
Where supporters and opponents disagree is on economic impact. Supporters point out the
benefits of job creation and the municipal revenue stream. Opponents point out the redirection
of spending away from existing businesses, estimating a net loss of over $129 million annually
to the regional economy. Tourism benefit is not considered to be significant; with more than 20
casinos across Ontario it is estimated that approximately 5% of casino visitors would be non-
residents.
The municipal revenue stream is based on the formula set out in the Financial Implications
section of this report. Over the past month the provincial government has repeated that the
same formula applies to all municipalities; however, media reports in recent days indicate that
there may be a different agreement under consideration for the City of Toronto.
Staff’s perspective is that a casino would not be a wealth-generating economic development
tool in this region. This is consistent with the March 2013 report by the Martin Prosperity
Institute, regarding the proposed Toronto casino, which states, “The academic research shows
that the total costs, much which would accrue to the city, are somewhere between two and
seven times the benefit received.”
A modernized casino in Kitchener, or in close proximity to the urban areas of Kitchener,
Cambridge and Waterloo, would appear to be an economic benefit to OLG and the casino
operator, and an economic cost to the regional community.
If there were economic benefits that outweighed social costs then the argument could be made
that a casino would be beneficial to the community. However, it is clear that the economic
impact is itself a cost rather than a benefit.
Alignment with Kitchener Economic Development Strategy:
The Kitchener Economic Development Strategy (KEDS) has not identified a casino as a priority
for the City of Kitchener. Under the category of “Strategic Imperatives”, KEDS has committed
the City to evaluate, in partnership with our stakeholders and regional partners, the need for and
feasibility of big-city business service functions, such as a convention centre, additional
education or cultural industry catalysts. One of the proponents of the casino has linked it to the
development of a convention centre complex. In this case, it could be argued that a casino
provides a potential bridge to a privately funded expanded convention facility in the Waterloo
Region. However, such a rationale would be tangential to the main thrust of KEDS which is
focused on supporting the start-up ecosystem, building globally competitive clusters, attracting
and retaining talent, building a dynamic downtown and shaping the Innovation District. A casino
does not figure prominently in any of these strategies.
7 (a) - 6
Terms & Conditions if Kitchener is Willing Host
Those who spoke in favour of Kitchener declaring its willingness to host a casino and
proceeding at least to the next step of the OLG process cited the benefits of considering specific
proposals. They suggested that the City could address potential negative effects by
establishing terms and conditions (e.g., location away from sensitive uses; mitigate negative
effect on competing venues, which would include Centre In the Square and the Kitchener
Memorial Auditorium Complex) and/or to leverage potential benefits (e.g., more entertainment
options closer to home; convention centre facilities provided sooner than otherwise likely and
owned and operated by the private sector).
Such terms and conditions would be intended to create a better fit between a proposed casino
and a host community. There is the risk that if they are too numerous or too stringent they may
make the host community less attractive than a nearby community with less stringent
conditions.
ALIGNMENT WITH CITY OF KITCHENER STRATEGIC PLAN:
Compass Kitchener is a citizen advisory committee responsible for advising city council on
critical strategic issues and goals in the community. The committee considered whether a
casino in Kitchener would align with our City’s Strategic Plan, and found that the matter was
relevant to the following 5 of the 6 community priorities:
Dynamic Downtown
Leadership and Community Engagement
Environment
Quality of Life
Development
In its presentation to Council on May 6 Compass Kitchener concluded that a casino would
conflict with or would contradict all five of those strategic priorities and cited a number of
strategic directions, under each priority, that would not be aligned with a casino.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
The OLG has outlined a host funding model which is presently under review. The model
provides for the following revenue-sharing arrangements which would be formalized in a
Municipality Contribution Agreement:
5.25% for the first $65M of net Slot Revenue; plus
3.00% on the next $135M of net Slot Revenue; plus
2.50% on the next $300M of net Slot Revenue; plus
0.50% on the remainder of net Slot Revenue.
The OLG Slots at Georgian Downs can be used as a comparator, based on number of slot
machines, and it has generated municipal revenues averaging approximately $4M per year over
an eleven year period. Estimates of municipal revenue in this region may be double that based
on regional population and proximity of a casino to population centre. However, if slot machines
7 (a) - 7
are eventually displaced by other games or other technologies, the municipal revenue could be
reduced significantly.
The City could anticipate receiving development charges, permit fees and annual property tax
revenues from a casino operation. These amounts have not been quantified.
As numerous public delegations have noted, the introduction of a casino would result in
increased costs to service local infrastructure and provide for increased public health, social
service and emergency service costs (mostly at the upper-tier level).
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT:
In order to inform the public, a web page was launched that provided an overview of OLG’s
mandate, current status of the decisions of neighbouring municipalities in Waterloo Region, and
‘Next Steps” for the City of Kitchener.
Engaging and consulting with the community was essential. An extensive community
engagement campaign was launched to promote the four options for the public to provide their
input:
1. Complete an online survey (open April 15 – May 1)
2. Complete paper surveys (available April 15 – May 1)
3. Provide feedback directly to City Hall, either through the Office of the Mayor and Council,
directly to councillors, or to the Director of Corporate Communications & Marketing
4. Attend, or register to speak, at two Town Hall public input evenings, April 23 and 30, or
the Special Council meeting for citizen advisory committees, May 6, all of which were
held at City Hall
The public was made aware of these opportunities through the local media, city-submitted
newspaper articles, councillor columns, social media and prominence on the city’s website.
As well, for those unable to attend the Town Hall sessions, Rogers TV taped the proceedings
and posted to their website. A link was also added to the city’s website at
www.kitchener.ca/casino.
CONCLUSION:
Community input is overwhelmingly opposed to a casino in principle, and not at all likely to be
swayed by terms and conditions, or specific casino proposals.
OLG acknowledges the rates of problem gambling in Ontario. In addition, ease of access is
expected to cause an increase of problem gambling in this region. On that basis we are
compelled not only to decline the opportunity to host a casino, but to take steps to ensure that a
casino does not establish nearby where the same negative social and economic effects would
be suffered by Kitchener and the regional community.
At a recent joint meeting of all municipal councils in Waterloo Region councillors heard that a
community’s shared values are what make us attractive to businesses that also share those
values. This regional community’s values are exemplified by the “barnraisers’ tradition” in which
7 (a) - 8
“individuals and groups work together to benefit everyone, without regard to personal gain”
(Waterloo Region Record, Barnraiser Award). This is part of what distinguishes us from
communities elsewhere in Ontario and across Canada. The casino concept is in stark contrast,
as its appeal is the individual (casino operator or a winner) may experience personal gain but
only at the expense of others (other local businesses and those who lose money at the casino).
Taking a stand on OLG casinos that is different from other Ontario communities would be
consistent with that our community’s tradition and shared values.
On this basis it is recommended that Council pursue Option 3.
ACKNOWLEDGED BY: Corporate Leadership Team
Appendices
A. Map of Zone SW#1
B. Chart of OLG process
C. Minutes of April 23 2013 “Town Hall” Council Meeting
D. Minutes of April 30 2013 “Town Hall” Council Meeting
E. Environics Analysis and Summary of City of Kitchener Survey results
F. Independent written input received from the community
7 (a) - 9
7 (a) - 10
7 (a) - 11
SPECIAL COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 23, 2013 CITY OF KITCHENER
A special meeting of City Council was held at 6:02 p.m. this date, chaired by Mayor C. Zehr with all
members present.
Notice of this meeting had been previously given to all members of Council by the City Clerk pursuant
to Chapter 25 (Council Procedure) of the Municipal Code.
Messrs. Larry Flynn, SVP - Gaming, Paul Pellizzari, Executive Director - Policy & Social
Responsibility and Jake Pastore, Director - Community & Municipal Relations, addressed Council on
behalf of the Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation (OLG) to present an overview of the OLG’s
plan to modernize its lottery and gaming operations. Mr. Flynn advised that over the last seven
years, OLG has contributed $1.7B to $2B annually to the Province. He added that OLG also annually
contributes $40M to Ontario’s problem gambling strategy. He stated that part of the OLG’s
modernization plan will see the development of at least one gaming facility in each of the 29 zones
identified across the Province.He noted that zone SW1 includes the Region of Waterloo, which
currently has 83,000 residents who are members of OLG’s loyalty program.
Mr. Pastore further advised that the OLG has engaged 68 communities across the Province, with
approximately 39 municipalities expressing support for the modernization program. He added that 10
communities indicated support for neighbouring municipalities and 12 municipalities from outside of
the gaming zones have expressed an interest in participating. He suggested that Kitchener could
contact the 24 municipalities that currently host OLG gaming facilities as a means of garnering further
information on this matter. He reviewed the process that is being followed by the OLG, indicating that
the Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation Act stipulates that interested municipalities must
undertake public consultation and have the ability to back out of being considered a host site at any
step in the process. He advised that the Premier of Ontario has stressed that the OLG shall not
locate a facility in a municipality that has indicated it does not wish to be considered as a host site. In
addition, the location of the gaming facility must be amenable to the host municipality. He noted that
the SW1 zone has been identified as potentially hosting 1,200 slot machines and 50 gaming tables.
Mr. Pellizzari then presented information on the OLG’s role in ensuring responsible gambling in
Ontario. He advised that Ontario is considered to have one of the best Responsible Gambling
structures in the world. He stated that OLG staff is trained to identify red flag behaviour and direct
people suspected as having a gambling problem to free counseling. He estimated that 150,000
Ontarians are assisted each year through the Responsible Gambling Centres located at all gaming
facilities and off-site counsellors in 20 offices across the Province. He commented that the OLG does
not want problem gamblers, noting that it is a bad businesses model as well as being bad for public
health. He stated that as part of the modernization, the OLG will be implementing technology to set
time / money limits on slot machines, driven by data analysis of play patterns. In addition, the OLG
has implemented an education program to help people make an informed choice about gambling.
In response to questions, Mr. Flynn advised that while he does not have specific data related to
Waterloo Region, approximately 55% of the OLG’s gaming customers are at or above the median
earning level. He stated that since November 1999, the City of Brantford has received approximately
$50M for being a host municipality, which was applied toward their infrastructure needs. He added
that the Premier of Ontario has directed that the funding formula needs to be fairly applied across all
zones; therefore, municipalities with existing facilities should serve as good case studies into the
benefits of hosting. He indicated that the total revenue generated in 2012 by the OLG was
approximately $6.5B, noting that $2B of this amount went to the Province. Mr. Pellizzari commented
it is challenging to accurately identify the number of suicides and / or bankruptcies directly associated
with gambling. He stated that as the operator of these gaming facilities, OLG is committed to
providing the most robust program it can to provide help to mitigate problems. He added that in 2012
there were 158,376 interactions at the Responsible Gambling Centres. He noted that the OLG gives
$40M to public health, in addition to the $13.8M spent on their own programs aimed at educating the
public as to the risks associated with gambling. Mr. Flynn further advised that the Ontario Lottery and
Gaming Corporation Act clearly outlines that the OLG is to engage lower tier municipalities, who may
choose to share a portion of their hosting fees with a regional government and / or neighbouring
municipalities.
Dr. Liana Nolan, Waterloo Region Medical Officer of Health, circulated copies of the position
statement issued by Region of Waterloo Public Health in December 2012, on the health impacts of
problem gambling. She advised that problem gambling will increase in Waterloo Region with the
proximity of a casino because of increased access. She stated that revenues are generated from
7 (a) - 12
SPECIAL COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 23, 2013 - 86-CITY OF KITCHENER
gambling losses, which are unevenly distributed among those who are least able to afford such
losses. She stressed that the revenue generated by gambling relies in part on problem gamblers and
current measures to prevent problem gambling have had limited effectiveness. She advised that it
has been estimated that 5.5% of the clients in Ontario casinos are addicted to slots and generate
31% of the revenues from those machines. She added that 12.1% of the clients are addicted to table
games and generate 57% of revenues. Dr. Nolan further advised that it is estimated that 1.2% to
3.4% of the population of Ontario have moderate to severe forms of problem gambling. She added
that with a casino in Waterloo Wellington, this increased access would result in approximately 8,800
high severity problem gamblers and 26,300 moderately severe problem gamblers.She noted that
every problem gambler affects about 2.8 family members; therefore, 98,000 family members would
be affected by a casino in this area. She indicated that the Canadian Community Health Survey Data
suggests the prevalence of problem gambling in Waterloo Region is currently estimated at almost half
the provincial average. She commented that the main health impact of gambling is that in some
individuals it leads to problem gambling, which then impacts the overall community.
Mr. Mark Bingeman, Bingemans Grand Experiences, circulated an information package to Council,
outlining reasons in support of having an OLG gaming facility located in the City of Kitchener. He
advised that the City could receive $4M to over $8M annually in potential hosting fees. He estimated
that the City, as well as the Region of Waterloo, could garner in excess of $7M in development
charges and permit fees. He added that this new development would also generate significant
property tax revenues annually for the City and the Region. He spoke to the potential tourism
benefits associated with a casino, suggesting that it could draw over 700 bus tours from one bus tour
operator. He put forward that it would result in immediate construction jobs, estimating that building a
casino in Kitchener would result in over $250M in private sector investment. Mr. Bingeman advised
that once completed, a casino would employ over 1,500 people which could put over $35M in payroll
dollars back into the community. He commented that the City could use the additional revenues
generated by a casino to help bolster local arts and culture, infrastructure and / or social services.
Mr. Sean Simpson, Ipsos Reid, circulated copies of a survey conducted by his company on behalf of
Bingemans Grand Experiences from April 10 to April 15, 2013. He advised that this survey sampled
502 Kitchener residents who were interviewed by telephone, adding that quotas on age and gender
were used to ensure balanced demographic sampling. He stated that a survey with an unweighted
probability sample of this size has an estimated margin of error of +/- 4.4 percentage points, 19 times
out of 20, of what the results would be had all Kitchener residents been surveyed. He gave an
overview of the survey results, indicating that most residents are aware of the OLG’s plans to consult
municipalities on their interests in a casino. He stated that most appear to have at least some degree
of knowledge about what a casino could mean for the City, adding that two thirds want to learn more
about the various proposals that might come forward to build a casino; and, the associated impacts
that it could have on the City.
Mr. Rob Simpson circulated materials outlining his opposition to a casino being built in the City of
Kitchener, highlighting the economics of a new casino in Waterloo Region. He gave a presentation
indicating that a casino would result in a net outflow of $180M, which would have gone toward
entertainment and leisure activities based in Waterloo Region. He stated that minus the $50.5M
inflow into the Regional economy related to wages and hosting fee, this equates to an annual overall
loss of $129.5M for the local economy. He noted that such a loss would profoundly harm local
businesses and jobs. In addition, a casino would harm the community due to the increase in problem
gambling.
Ms. Nicole Gatchene, Kitchener Youth Action Council (KYAC) addressed Council in opposition to the
City of Kitchener being a host municipality for an OLG gaming facility. She advised that KYAC is
concerned that if Council agrees to host a casino that this would equate to consenting to gambling.
She stated that a 2009 survey of Ontario students indicated that 42.6% had gambled despite it being
illegal. She suggested that if approved, a program should be implemented to educate youth as to the
dangers of gambling.
Mr. Matt Jantzi spoke in opposition to a casino being built in Kitchener, commenting that casinos
foster a number of social problems. He stated that if a casino was built in close proximity to
Kitchener, this would also have a negative impact on this community, with little to no economic
support to address those challenges. He encouraged Council to say no to the OLG and reach out to
the Township of Woolwich and ask that they reconsider their decision to host a casino.
7 (a) - 13
SPECIAL COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 23, 2013 - 87-CITY OF KITCHENER
Ms. Barbara Spronk, Poverty Free KW Action Group, gave a presentation outlining her organization’s
opposition to having a casino located in the City of Kitchener. She advised that a casino would result
in increased expenditures to address social problems within the community. She commented that
casinos offer a false sense of hope, particularly to low income households. She added that 9% of
Kitchener’s population is low income, which is higher than any other municipality in Waterloo Region.
Ms. Ginny Quinn addressed Council in opposition and expressed concern with the decision made by
the Township of Woolwich to consent to potentially hosting a casino. She noted the various tourist
attractions that currently existing in this community, commenting that a casino is not needed to draw
people to Waterloo Region. She suggested that the small financial allocation the City would receive
from the OLG would not offset the numerous negative impacts of a casino.
Pastor Vidya Narimalla, Kitchener Mennonite Brethren Church, submitted a petition signed by 110
members of his Church who are in opposition to having a casino built in the City of Kitchener. He
questioned the benefits of hosting a casino, stating that casinos are not a viable form of economic
development; rather, it is a regressive form of taxation aimed at a vulnerable portion of society.
Ms. Christiane Sadeler, Waterloo Region Crime Prevention Council, circulated a position paper
outlining her organization’s opposition to casinos and proposing 12 recommendations to mitigate the
negative impacts associated with problem gambling. She advised the data shows that a direct link
between the presence of a casino and increases in crime as being inconclusive; however, it does
demonstrate growth in the risk factors for crime. She stated that population health research indicates
that the opening of a casino leads to a direct increase in problem gambling within a community. She
added that the outcomes of problem gambling tend to not only negatively impact the individual, but
also can create significant community and social costs.
Mr. Les Holdway, C5 - The Centre for Corporate Communications and Competition, addressed
Council in opposition to having an OLG gaming facility located in the City of Kitchener. He advised
that when the slot machines were installed in Elora, the OLG indicated that they intended to be long-
term partners with the community; however, it does not appear that the OLG will be extending the 20-
year agreement it has with Elora. He noted that the slot machines at the Elora racetrack have had
little influence on tourism in that area.
The meeting then recessed at 8:00 p.m. and reconvened at 8:05 p.m. chaired by Mayor C. Zehr with
all members present.
Ms. Chaitanya Jyoti Parivrajika, Brahmarishi Mission of Canada, addressed Council in opposition to
having an OLG gaming facility located in Kitchener, noting how gambling goes against the tenets of
her religion. She commented that gambling can poison the mind, body and spirit and lead to an
unhappy and unproductive society.
Mr. Randall Templeton, Trinity United Church, submitted a petition signed by 183 members of his
Church who are in opposition to having a casino being built in the City of Kitchener. He expressed
concerns regarding the negative impact that a casino would have on the local economy as well as the
estimated increase in the number of problem gamblers. He commented that if a casino is built in the
Township of Woolwich, the City should seek some form of legal redress to mitigate the costs
associated with increased spending toward social programs and crime prevention.
Mr. Michael Kellett registered as a delegation to speak to this matter; however, he was not in
attendance this date.
Mr. Clint Rohr, Woolwich Concerned Citizens Against Gambling Expansion in Waterloo Region, gave
an overview as to why he opposes the construction of a casino anywhere in the Region of Waterloo.
He stated that it is the position of his organization that the decision made by the Council of the
Township of Woolwich is an infringement on the rights of all residents of Waterloo Region, suggesting
that a question as to whether an OLG gaming facility should be located in this Region should be
added to the ballot of the next municipal election.
Mr. Shayne Sangster, Kitchener Centre New Democrats, addressed Council in opposition to having
an OLG gaming facility located in Kitchener. He suggested that a casino would be counterproductive
to the economic investments the City has made in its Downtown core. He commented that it was
unlikely the OLG would build a resort casino, such as Casino Niagara or Casino Rama, estimating
that a smaller scale casino would be constructed in Kitchener. He stated that it is doubtful a casino in
7 (a) - 14
SPECIAL COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 23, 2013 - 88-CITY OF KITCHENER
Kitchener would be able to attract gamblers from outside of this region; thereby, relying on the local
economy to generate revenues.
Ms. Trudy Beaulne, the Social Planning Council of Kitchener-Waterloo, circulated copies of her
speaking notes, which convey her organization’s opposition to locating a casino anywhere within the
boundaries of the Region of Waterloo. She commented that the only way a casino makes a profit is
at the loss of it patrons, adding that this is not a healthy business proposition from which to
encourage responsibility or healthy community development. She asked that an objective
assessment be undertaken to determine the overall impact that a casino would have on the
community.
Mr. Douglass Grant advised of the negative impact a casino had on the community of Sydney, Nova
Scotia. He outlined his personal knowledge of the detrimental effects of gambling and urged Council
to reject the proposal to have an OLG gaming facility located in the City of Kitchener.
Mr. Richard Christy, spoke in opposition to the OLG’s proposal, advising that as Mayor of the City of
Kitchener in 1996, he convened a meeting with his counterparts from neighbouring municipalities and
at that time, it was agreed to reject a similar proposal from the Provincial Government to have a
casino built in this area. He referred to a book entitled “The Luck Business” which outlines the
adverse effects of legalized gambling on municipalities in the United States of America. He
acknowledged the difficulties of resisting the potential revenues generated by a casino, particularly
given the possibility of one being built in an adjacent municipality. However, in his opinion, rejecting
this proposal was the right decision in 1996 and continues to be the right decision for the City of
Kitchener.
Mr. Jan d’Ailly, expressed concern with what he views as an attempt by the Provincial Government to
earn additional revenues by increasing the number of casinos in Ontario. He commented on the
potential detrimental impacts that this could have on the health and safety of the community.
Ms. Annette Anderson was in attendance and expressed her opposition to having a casino built in the
City of Kitchener.
Ms. Emely Tscholy recited a quote from her father that “casinos weren’t built by winners.”
Mr. Bill Schneider conveyed his opposition to having a casino located within the Region of Waterloo.
He commented that the Township of Woolwich does not have the mandate to commit the entire
Region to having a casino. He suggested that the City of Kitchener should set out a condition that
further dialogue on this matter would only move forward if the Township of Woolwich agrees to
withdraw its support for a casino.
Moved by Councillor F. Etherington
Seconded by Councillors S. Davey
“That leave be given the Mover and Seconder to introduce a by-law to confirm all actions and
proceedings of the Council and that the same be taken as read a first, second and third times, be
finally passed and numbered 2013-053 by the Clerk.”
Carried.
On motion the meeting adjourned at 8:50 p.m.
MAYOR CLERK
7 (a) - 15
SPECIAL COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 30, 2013 CITY OF KITCHENER
A special meeting of City Council was held at 6:05 p.m. this date, chaired by Mayor C. Zehr with all
members present.
Notice of this meeting had been previously given to all members of Council by the City Clerk pursuant
to Chapter 25 (Council Procedure) of the Municipal Code.
Mayor Zehr advised that this was the second of two public consultation sessions being held as to
whether the City of Kitchener should be a host municipality for an Ontario Lottery and Gaming
Corporation (OLG) facility. He stated that as per the process agreed upon at the April 8, 2013 special
Council meeting, Councillors would not be asking questions of the delegations. He added that this
matter is scheduled to be considered at the May 13, 2013 Council meeting, noting that no further
delegations would be permitted to address Council at that time.
Mr. Ted Parkinson advised that, in his opinion, the Provincial Government has already decided that a
casino would be located in Waterloo Region, what is unclear is whether it will be constructed in the
Township of Woolwich or another municipality. He commented that the majority of residents would
be happy if Kitchener City Council decided against being a host municipality; however, it would just
mean that Woolwich would receive the financial benefits from a casino. He suggested that the local
area municipalities should approach the Provincial Government to demand that if a casino is built
anywhere in Waterloo Region, then the revenues should be shared across all local area
municipalities; rather, than the current process of pitting the various municipalities against each other.
Mr. Marcus Shantz spoke in opposition to an OLG gaming facility being located in Waterloo Region.
He stated that a casino would not positively impact the City’s economic development and would not
benefit the local economy as most spending would occur at the casino. He cautioned against
assuming that a casino would be located in the Township of Woolwich, noting that there is still time
for that municipality to reconsider its decision.
Ms. Karen Scott gave a presentation in opposition to a casino being located in the City of Kitchener.
She expressed concerns with respect to the impact a gaming facility might have on this community,
noting personal experiences of the difficulties of living with a severe problem gambler.
Mr. Patrick Yanchus addressed Council in support of the City of Kitchener agreeing to host an OLG
gaming facility. He encouraged Council to endorse the use of Bingemans as a potential future
location for a casino in Kitchener.
Mr. Peter Durksen, Grace Mennonite Brethren Church, gave a presentation, outlining his opposition
to a casino being located in the City of Kitchener. He asked that Council consider how a casino
would negatively impact the social fabric of this community.
Mr. James Howe advised that he is opposed to a casino anywhere in Waterloo Region, stating that
the OLG is acting in bad faith by not dealing with the municipalities in this Region as one entity. He
suggested that the Township of Woolwich has forced this debate on the City of Kitchener by agreeing
to host an OLG gaming facility. He commented that building a casino in Kitchener does not fit with
the tenets of a safe and healthy community. He commented that no amount of money could mitigate
the social consequences associated with problem gambling and asked that Council reject the
possibility of being a host municipality.
Ms. Shannon Weber, Downtown Kitchener Business Improvement Area (BIA), addressed Council
indicating that the BIA believes that there is no place for a casino in the City of Kitchener. She stated
that while municipalities across Ontario may have embraced a casino as a strategy to assist with
growing and revitalizing their languishing downtown areas and to stimulate economic development,
this is not required in Downtown Kitchener. She advised that the City’s Downtown is currently on a
path of positive economic development, due to existing investments. She recited a quote from
Richard Florida in the Huffington Post, “that casino building is city ruining of the highest order, and
virtually every serious study that has ever been done as to the economic impacts of casinos shows
that their costs far exceed their benefits.” She added that if Council were to agree to host a casino,
the BIA would request a commitment to fund activities to promote the Downtown recognizing the
economic and social burdens that a casino would impose on the City’s core.
Mr. Lawrence Bingeman addressed Council in support of the City of Kitchener examining the
possibility of becoming a host municipality for an OLG gaming facility. He noted several issues that
7 (a) - 16
SPECIAL COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 30, 2013 - 103-CITY OF KITCHENER
were at one time considered normal, but in today’s society seem outdated; such as no shopping on
Sundays. He suggested that in the future, the same viewpoint might be taken regarding this debate
as to whether the City should host a casino. He stated the OLG indicated that 83,000 people from
this area leave the Region to gamble in nearby casinos, adding that it would make sense to have
those people spend their money in Kitchener.
Ms. Nadine Quehl, Alliance Against Poverty, provide Council with a copy of a position paper develop
by her organization, which outlines their objections to a casino being located anywhere in Waterloo
Region. She stated that the Problem Gambling Research team at the University of Waterloo found
that casinos represent a loss for the local economy, since the majority of money is spent in the casino
hotel, restaurants and shops, instead of local businesses. She suggested that the proposed casinos
are to be run for the benefit of the Provincial Government and not the host municipality.
Ms. Sue Pallas expressed concerns with the possibility of the City of Kitchener becoming a host
municipality for an OLG gaming facility. She spoke of her personal history of being a problem
gambler, noting the damage that addiction has had on her life.
Mr. Harald Drewitz circulated informational material, outlining his objections to a casino being
constructed in the City of Kitchener. He spoke to the financial implications of a casino, expressing
surprise with the information provided by the OLG that the average salary of someone working at a
casino was $50,000. to $60,000. He suggested that those amounts do not coincide with what has
been reported in the media, adding that the City should request a breakdown from the OLG as to how
much non-management employees earn annually.
Jelacic Juraj was listed as a delegation to address Council on this matter, but was not in attendance
at this meeting.
Mr. Bill Pegg, K-W Gaming Centre Sponsors, provided Council with several reports outlining the
impacts that a casino may have on the municipality. He advised that while he is ambivalent about a
casino being located in Waterloo Region, he is offended by the inference that the OLG is dishonest.
He stated that their mandate is to control gaming within the Province and to turn a profit from it on
behalf of the taxpayers. He expressed concerns with the offensive and degrading comments made
by some people that gaming is a tax on the poor and the stupid. He advised that no one has the right
to judge people who happen to enjoy casinos as one of their entertainment choices, regardless of
their financial circumstances. He pointed out that the OLG gets 90% of its revenues from 30% of its
customers; however, most businesses make the vast majority of their revenues off of a small group of
regular customers. He suggested that Council could decide to share any revenues the City receives
from the OLG with the rest of the Region as a means of mitigating the social impacts of a casino on
this area. He noted that his only reason for supporting a casino would be the possible injection of
millions of dollars into the local economy through construction jobs and eventually casino employee
payroll. He suggested that accordingly, Council should move forward with negotiation with the OLG
as a means of garnering further information.
Mr. Rob Martin, Waterloo Region Suicide Prevention Council, circulated a position paper indicating
his organization’s opposition to a casino being located in Kitchener. He asked that Council consider
the impact that a casino would have on people in the community who currently experience gambling
problems and addiction or will develop it in the future. He stated that while the evidence on the
association between casinos and suicide is not clear; it is known that problem gamblers are three and
a half times more likely to attempt suicide compare to the general population.He suggested that the
development of a casino in Waterloo Region would facilitate the means for problem gamblers to
develop or worsen in people who are already struggling with this addiction.
Mr. Joe Mancini, The Working Centre, spoke to the experience his organization had in operating two
charity casinos on behalf of area service clubs in the mid-1990s. He stated that after only two
weekends the Working Centre determined that sharing in the profits made through gambling was
wrong. He added that a disproportionate amount of revenues made from gambling comes from the
poor and asked that Council not support the proposal to host an OLG gaming facility.
Mr. John Neufeld, The House of Friendship, spoke to the risk factors associated with having a casino
located within this community. He commented that while the potential for an additional source of
revenue is enticing, the generation of this revenue would come at the expense of members of the
community. He noted the inadequate amount of funding that is currently provided by the Provincial
7 (a) - 17
SPECIAL COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 30, 2013 - 104-CITY OF KITCHENER
Government for social services, adding that a casino would place a further strain on those services.
He requested that Council not support the proposal to host an OLG gaming facility.
Mr. Mike Farwell indicated that a casino built anywhere in Waterloo Region would bring a variety of
negative social consequences that would affect all residents. He stated that the Medical Officer of
Health indicated that a casino in this Region would create 8,800 high severity problem gamblers. He
added that prior to building a casino in Columbus, Ohio last year, a study was conducted by
community research partners, which estimated the cost of treating one problem gambler at $715. per
year. He suggested that it would cost approximately $6.3M annually to treat the problem gamblers in
this community. He noted that this is significantly higher than the estimated $4M in revenue that a
casino would generate for the local municipality. He stated that while it is undeniable that a casino
would generate revenues for the municipality, it is also true that building a casino would create a host
of new problems. He noted that while those problems are primarily social, there is an economic
argument to consider. He commented that, he does not want to see a casino located in this Region
because we, as a community, are better than that. He cited several examples of how Kitchener has
fostered economic development, noting that the revenues generated by a casino are not needed for
the future success of this community.
Mr. Ivan McNeilly provided Council with materials outlining his objections to a casino being located in
the City of Kitchener. He advised that he is a retired member of the Salvation Army, who opposes all
forms of gambling. He commented that the OLG is not so much interested in providing citizens with
pleasurable entertainment as they are in reaping profits. He added that in his opinion, this is another
form of taxation on people who are too weak to refrain from this enticement. He submitted a petition
signed by 50 members of the Salvation Army Kitchener Community Church rejecting the idea of a
casino being located in Kitchener.
Ms. Marcela Saad circulated a copy of her speaking notes to Council, which expressed her opposition
to Kitchener being a host municipality for an OLG gaming facility. She encouraged Council to
continue with the implementation of the City’s Economic Development Strategy to modernize and
diversify the local economy by placing an emphasis on emerging economic clusters. She suggested
that residents are not prepared to accept the unsavory changes that a casino would bring to the City’s
existing health environment.
Mr. Jerry Forler advised that as a resident of the Township of Woolwich he was requesting that the
City of Kitchener reject the proposal put forward by the OLG. He stated that ten years ago he was
part of a coalition of concerned citizens who opposed the addition of slot machines to the Elmira
Racetrack. He expressed concerns with the impact that a gaming facility may have on the area’s
youth.
Mr. Abdul Rahimi spoke in opposition to a casino being located in the City of Kitchener. He expressed
concerns with regards to the detrimental impacts a casino could have on the community, noting that
he did not wish to have his seven children grow up to be gamblers.
Ms. Sharon Wallace addressed Council in opposition to Kitchener being a host municipality for an
OLG gaming facility. She commented that the disingenuous self-interested arguments put forward in
favour of a casino were disheartening. She stated that this is a legacy decision, which will impact
future generations; accordingly, Council needs to ensure that its decision is in the best interest of the
community.
Moved by Councillor K. Galloway-Sealock
Seconded by Councillor S. Davey
“That leave be given the Mover and Seconder to introduce a by-law to confirm all actions and
proceedings of the Council and that the same be taken as read a first, second and third times, be
finally passed and numbered 2013-058 by the Clerk.”
Carried.
On motion the meeting adjourned at 7:53 p.m.
MAYOR CLERK
7 (a) - 18
7 (a) - 19
7 (a) - 20
7 (a) - 21
7 (a) - 22
7 (a) - 23
7 (a) - 24
7 (a) - 25
7 (a) - 26
7 (a) - 27
7 (a) - 28
7 (a) - 29
Public Comments Submission Opinion
Date
Not sure where or when the citizens of Kitchener get to vote or 3/14/2013 Opposed
in our region, but here is my 2cents worth. NO. We do not need a
somewhere close to home for people with gambling addictions to throw their hard
earned money away easily. Its bad enough that every corner store sell pro line
tickets and lottery tickets, we have off track betting facilitie and no
gambles anonymous facilities or mandatory counseling for bankrupt gamblers. These
are hard times that we live in now, making those that have money
out of town to do so, makes sure that only those that can really
Only the bookie laughs all the way to the bank, in this case the Lottery corporation,
not Kitchener residents.
Sent an email with a link for an indoor resort instead of a casi3/14/2013 Suggestion
money maker, especially if it looked like sunlight.
Please help us protest against the OLG slot and Table attendants. Regarding them 3/14/2013 None
receiving tips and DO NOT report any tips to our Government, As
procedures in place to report tips. Liquor servers here in Ontario have a minimum
wage of just $8.90 an hour, compared with $10.25 minimum wage and receives
approximately $3,000.00- $6,000.00 annually in tips.
A server here in Ontario has to claim their tips and report the
line 104 on T4 slips. OLG Casino employees earns $17.50 and upwards an hour and
receives Approximately $45,000.00-$100,000.00 in tips annually and DONT claim
receiving any tips to the Ontario Government.
Do you think that the OLG Employees should have to follow the sa
the Restaurants industry and claim their tips?
It's the Gambling season again politically, Councillor. Why anyo3/15/2013 Opposed
into the business would want a Casino even in the same county re
person's delusion than anything else. Here's hoping that you wil
initiative in this area.
What is offensive here is that the OLG has anything to say about
promotes itself as something useful. Its role is to prevent orga
gaining purchase anywhere and try to help gamblers kick their dise, not expand
the market for loan sharks.
Called to advise first Scott, then Carl, and then all council th3/15/2013 Opposed
having a Casino in the Region of Waterloo, or anywhere in the ar
7 (a) - 30
The legalization of gambling was a reasonable and sensible idea because it gave 3/18/2013 Opposed
government, instead of organized crime, control over this activi
government that has now has become addicted to gambling. We are
half from Casino Niagara, not to mention the one in Niagara Falls, New York. There is
a casino in the Barrie area only two hours from here. There is a
only three hours from here. The Provincial Government, with the
plan to increase the number of Casino's, is turning gambling from a destination event
into a common widespread activity. There is plenty of common gam
through the lotteries available at pretty well every stand-alone corner store, grocery
store and gas station variety store. Holding out this carrot to so many municipalities
is unfathomable. If we actually need this money then we should r
than encourage more gambling. Gambling merely transfers money. O
very little economic benefit. The OLG takes a 50% rake off, the house takes a profit
and the rest gets goes out in prizes, much of which is then used
for more gambling. There are already plenty of gaming opportunit
do not need to fuel the OLG/Provincial government gambling addiction. Legalizing
gambling is one thing, turning it into a commonplace is quite an
you to firmly reject the idea of a Casino in Kitchener and use y
that it does not come to the Waterloo Region.
Many citizens are urging Woolwich Township to SAY NO TO THE CA3/20/2013 Opposed
of having one here in the Region will far outweigh the lit
`receive as a bribe.
Thanks to the Record for another insightful Editorial on Saturday March 2.
Woolwich council may be sorry if they break ranks with the res
Back in the `90s when The Harris Government was closing hospitals and
of our two acute care hospitals , St. Marys , was on the hit list, this community
roared like a lion and banded together to fight this great
time the same gogift us with a casino. Our mayors
and councils banded together and, as I remember it, it only took a few meetings
for them to reach an agreement...that ALL of them would say NO
other. We need that `loyalty ` again to keep Waterloo Reg
safer community.
The reasoning at the time was discussed : We already had Oktobe
Maple syrup Festival, the Quilt festival and so many other
lot of strangers and visitors and traffic here. Now we can a
Waterloo Jazz Festival, the Kitchener Blues Festival, the Mul
the Roundabouts plus 10,000 new people a year moving into Wat
It is my strong belief that the safety and well-being of our existing residents
should take priority and we should not be hosting a casin
problems it would visit on us.
7 (a) - 31
It was great to pick up Mayor Zehr on the new CBC Radio this morning. I have family 3/20/2013 Opposed
in KW and love the whole area.
I am concerned at the EROSION OF THE WORK ETHIC in Ontario with
the "casino way of thinking". What message are we sending our c
the whole community? Is it that family and work should move over for gambling and
entertainment?
Some years ago a semi-handicapped welfare recipient in the other half of my duplex
residence wanted to borrow $20. After further acquaintance I le
gambling (and of course I never was repaid).
I don't think this is the right path to go down, and as you poin
loss to the local economy.
I am also sad to hear that the steam rail line to St Jacob's can
a novel way to connect a downtown and colourful St Jacobs. Rather see it expanded!
He is against having a casino in the Region, or Kitchener. He fe3/25/2013 Opposed
we have gambling facilities within close distance of Kitchener f
like to pursue this type of entertainment. Also, he feels that this would make things
worse for people who cannot afford to gamble, and those who have
gambling.
George is opposed to having a casino in Kitchener or the Region.3/25/2013 Opposed
number of people that come out ahead when they gamble are few.
On this past Saturday a Waterloo Region Record headline read, "T3/26/2013 Suggestion
casino talks." My counsel is this: "Take all the time you need.
It's our Region, not the OLG's." In typical fashion, the OLG do
job - boasting all the gains of hosting a casino till everyone has dol
out their eyes, saying nothing about whose pockets the gains wilthe
social costs. Then in order to push through a Yes decision befo
big dreams bubble to burst and reality set in, they impose a qui
really think that if you don't meet their deadline they are goinr long?
If any member of council is against a casino then maybe bring a ion banning the 3/28/2013 Suggestion
sale of alcohol and tobacco products and fast food within the city of Kitchener as
these items are much more harmful than a gaming venue.
I wish to register my opposition to the establishment of casino 3/28/2013 Opposed
also agree with Mayor Zehr and other members of council, who bel
decision about such a facility should be made at a region level.ess of which
municipality hosts a casino, the costs and negative effects will
municipalities in the region. Southern Ontario is likely reachin
for this industry and every dollar of income associated with it
counterbalanced by perhaps several dollars of cost and negative
businesses that will lose the food and entertainment dollars tha
casino area. I repeat that I would like to see Kitchener council
to prevent a casino in our region.
I would like to register my opposition to a casino in our region 4/8/2013 Opposed
As someone employed at one of our Universities, I believe a casi
to the high value that Kitchener and Waterloo place on universities, study, and
research. I would hate to see our university and college student
gambling instead of studying.
Thank you for considering the community's opinions as you makes
matter.
7 (a) - 32
I just want to weigh in on this quickly. I am seriously opposed t4/8/2013 Opposed
region and ask that local councils not approve such a decision. My rationale:
Increase in casino availability leads to increases in addiction
Gambling has serious deleterious effects on families - I personally know several
families that have been destroyed by problem gambling.
The projected revenue is not worth it - very little will stay in our community anyway.
The public image of our community is damaged by such a business in our community.
I am a resident and taxpayer in Kitchener. Recently there has be4/8/2013 Opposed
whether the Region of Waterloo might be interested in bringing a
facility to the area. This proposal concerns me. Gambling is addictive and does not
help the vulnerable and poor in our region. A casino goes agains
associate with Waterloo region. I am vehemently opposed to the i
casino or gambling "gaming" facility to Kitchener or the Region of Waterloo
I am NOT in favour of hosting a casino in the Region of Waterloo because it does not 4/8/2013 Opposed
suit the high value that the region places on Universities, stud
casino goes counter to the desire for healthy cities and communities.
As a former resident of Kitchener and a current resident of Wate4/8/2013 Opposed
express my firm resistance to the proposed casino development in
Whatever may be our fiscal responsibilities and challenges, let us not meet them at
the expense of those in our community who will (it is not a ques
impoverish themselves and their families in the name of so-called entertainment. If
we facilitate the gaming addiction of even one person in our comhe
rupture of familial bonds in one household, then we will have ca
than any sum of revenue can undo.
I'll boil things down to a simple question: if a family member i
loved one, were struggling financially and facing difficult choices about how to live
and care for him/herself, would you recommend that he/she seek f
hope in a casino? It's doubtful, isn't it, perhaps ludicrous. Do
debt of thoughtful care to the residents in your communities who elected you to
represent their best interests?
WE ARE OPPOSED TO A CASINO ANYWHERE IN THE WATERLOO REGION! 4/8/2013 Opposed
A casino anywhere in our Region is:
- a fairytale pot-of-gold at the end of our neighbourly, municipally shared rainbow;
- a Band-Aid solution on a festering financial boil on overburdened gover
ledger books;
- the wrong lesson to teach. (Gambling does 'not' solve financial
We ask all levels of government (elected and staff) to lead by e
citizens' tax dollars:
- IDENTIFY the root financial problems;
- STOP rewarding public sector employees with unsustainable increa
- MANAGE expenses rather than trying to find a way to supplement y
- this list is not complete.
7 (a) - 33
The cost of treating addiction and the cost of heart break to fa4/9/2013 Opposed
the money raised. Much of the lost money (because it does come from the
gamblers) goes into the cost of maintaining & running the casino
more honorable ways of raising money for our local needs. In fact, I'm
higher tax in order to sustain our local needs.
A casino goes against the high value we place on universities, c
research. No doubt you are aware that suicide rates among addicted gamblers are
even higher than rates among others with addictions, as well as
that speak against gambling.
Supportive of having a casino in Kitchener or the Region. Feel t4/10/2013 Support
be a good location, and would prefer it to be here.
Thinks this is a "golden opportunity", especially to have it at 4/10/2013 Support
I have been a lifelong resident of the City of Kitchener. I do 4/10/2013 Opposed
be in our City, regardless of location. I understand that a casino may
neighbouring community and that in itself will have an impact on the entire region
and beyond. Early on it was expressed that Kitchener was not in-
now we are considering it? I feel as though we have been bullied into our
position. Leave the casino for someone else. Our City has many
focus on. A casino will create revenue, but will the costs, fin
outweigh the revenue. My wife and I do not wish to have a casino in our town.
Please say no to the casino.
We are very much against a casino in Kitchener. 4/10/2013 Opposed
I am opposed to opening a casino in the Waterloo-Wellington regions for numerous 4/10/2013 Opposed
reasons related to the loss of money by gamblers, and the type o
casino in the community. First, gambling revenue often comes fro
least afford it resulting in suffering and social service costs.
related-services such as hotels and restaurants do not provide quality e
opportunities. I was bemused to hear of Mark Bingeman's support
proposal. My son has worked many summers for Bingemans over nume
I am aware that most student jobs offered are at minimum wage or slightly above.
Unfortunately, adults---even those who have worked at Bingeman's for many years---
are not paid a "living wage".
I am most emphatically not in favour of the city of Kitchener hosting or establishing a 4/11/2013 Opposed
casino anywhere in within the Waterloo ( K-W ) region.
7 (a) - 34
You are to be commended for at least consulting with us on this 4/12/2013 Suggestion
personally do not feel I have enough information to make an info
decision as to whether I am in favour or not. For example 1) What would the
sharing arrangement with OLG be for the municipality it is locat
What portion would the Region and surrounding areas get if any? Who would
be financially responsible for ensuring that gambling issues would be
addressed? 4) What would the municipality who gets the casino use their
share of revenue for? It must be a focused plan of resource appl
just putting it into general revenue is something I would not suort. 5)
What process would be put in place to seek input regarding the l
the casino?
A prudent decision would be to approve additional investigation
negotiation with OLG and the province and keep us informed as yo
By saying yes to going to the next step does not commit to anything long
term and provides potential and possibilities. Saying no close
without knowing all the facts and this is not a good practice fo
such important decisions.
Finally, gambling is here now in many forms and a casino would be one more
on the list. The issue is not about having a casino in Ontario b
have one locally. I like living in a relatively free society and
governments micro-managing what I cannot do without through investigation and
unless we move further into the process we will never know if we
decision or not.
Opposition to the presence of a Casino in Kitchener, or the Regi4/16/2013 Opposed
Zehr that this should be a Regional decision, not a township or city decisi
Please count me among those who oppose a casino in Kitchener. 4/16/2013 Opposed
She is a senior who likes to gamble. 4/16/2013 Support
I want to let you know that I oppose the building of a casino in Kitchener. I dont 4/17/2013 Opposed
believe it can help people or our city in any way.
I would like you to know, as my representative on City Council, 4/17/2013 Opposed
the idea to build a casino, in Kitchener; whether it is at Bingeman's or not.
As an immigrant to this country, I have heard firsthand what pro
brought into the lives of some from my home country, I would not
same things happen in this wonderful city.
I would like to hear from you, on your stance on this issue.
Supports the idea of building a casino on Bingeman's land as par4/17/2013 Support
centre complex. Note that he is a senior manager at a local cons
I am against the casino and have started petition against at my church. 4/17/2013 Opposed
of the people I have talked to are against a casino. It disturb
heard more comments - perhaps because the discussion is rushed. There is little
doubt that a casino has been bad for communities like Brantford and Windsor,
spite a bright beginning and many promises made. I hope the Kit
will not be deceived. The hospitality jobs promised will come a
existing hospitality jobs and when all the easy money has been sucked out of our
community, the casino will be forced to scale back; leaving our
except a big half used building and a lot of addiction problems.
casino for Kitchener.
7 (a) - 35
I read that Kitchener and Waterloo had voted to hear from the re4/17/2013 Opposed
to the proposed Casino.
I do understand that there is considerable profit to be made and
gained can then be applied to several worthwhile projects that benefit the residents
of Ontario. To be sure that is positive.
However, it is equally sure that there are many very negative as
this move. I was recently at a luncheon with some Probus member
Janet Lynns. The subject of the Casino came up and I was shocked to hear that
suicides were not uncommon in the parking lots of existing casin
already acknowledged that we have an obligation to protect peopl
to tobacco by informing them in very graphic detail of the risks. We are clear with
the regulations in the workplace and the restrictions in restaur
some buildings that this activity is not welcome.
The addiction of gambling seems much more sanctioned. I have a dear friend and
former colleague who has lost a home and will face considerable
their profession career. We have had many conversations about t
gambling has -- it saddens me deeply to watch helplessly. I understand because am
one of the very small percentages of people who have, at least s
alcoholism which nearly destroyed my life. Casinos can wreak t
havoc: not only destroying careers, families, but people actual
as they realize they have lost all hope.
The money is alluring - I understand that. Everything is beginning to cost more both
privately and for the municipalities; however -- what "cost' does our city put on a
human life?
We are thankful that the City of Kitchener was not interested earlier in investigating4/17/2013 Opposed
Casino for our fine city. Please do not waiver on your earlier
unequivocally opposed to a casino happening anywhere in this reg
costs and the societal costs outweigh any talked about monetary gains. It is a known
fact that the most economically vulnerable people are affected m
venues. The myriad of advertisements by OLG focus totaling on w
creating a totally false illusion. The City of Kitchener and the Region of Waterloo
does not need a casino.
Members of our church and our Out of the Cold program have signe4/17/2013 Opposed
petition to oppose a casino in our area.
We will be continuing to collect signatures next Sunday and copies will be sent to
both city councils.
Members of our church and our Out of the Cold program have signe4/17/2013 Opposed
petition to oppose a casino in our area.
We will be continuing to collect signatures next Sunday and copies will be sent to
both city councils.
7 (a) - 36
I would like to voice my opinion in support of at least explorinlocating a 4/17/2013 Suggestion
casino in Kitchener. I was born in Kitchener in 1960. I return
Kitchener in 1975 with my family after living in the USA. If we do not explore what
the possibilities of a casino might mean - both financially and as a source of
entertainment for tourists and our citizens, as well as where it
avoid some of the by-product problems that are inherent in casinos - will you have
done your fiduciary duty to the City, to its current citizens, a
generations who may reap an annual dividend from this popular fo
entertainment. If you want to see how a casino can be run efficiently and
effectively go to Casino Rama. Set well away from the public, a
only by car...it is a model to be learned from. But the main point is, why vote no now
before you really know the question...why not vote yes to get all the details and then
make an informed decision after considering them? Isn't that what a well-run
government does?
I was pleased to see that the City is consulting the public over 4/17/2013 Opposed
After much web searching I found the consultation web page. However, it is not
functional, and I could not find a feedback/webmaster address to
this. The process would resonate better if it had a higher profi
For the record, I visited the casino area in Windsor for a professional meeting. The
neighbourhood was an economic desert and I could not find a sing
When I asked, people told me I would have to go to the casino fo
subsidized meal. This experience did not endear me to Windsor or Casinos!
Also, I remain concerned that the web-based poll is so obscure on your website that
it is almost impossible to find. Also, last night, the page was
Specifically: Reference to the public notices section of the hom
easily to the poll. Also, the page is not set up to trigger when a
search on the web. If these glitches can be addressed I think t
much larger and more representative poll.
It has been proven that casinos suck the wealth out of a community aside from a host 4/17/2013 Opposed
of other problems. Since you the council, have blown your wad on
doesn't take a rocket scientist ( maybe more than
accountant) to figure out that all the money has to stay here to pay for the albatross
called the Light rail
I ran for the City of Kitcheners city council a while back. I was reading about the 4/17/2013 Opposed
proposal for the casino at Bingeman Park. I think that the casin
impact on the region and the city. It has not been proven that casinos bring benef
to a region.
I am concerned with people gambling, losing money and people wit
losing it to big corporations. I am also concerned about where t
coming to build it. Would the casino operations be paid for by the governm
I vote if they go with the casino it should be at Bingman's where there is land and 4/18/2013 Suggestion
close to arteries in and out of the city
Resident does not feel we need a casino. People spend money they don't have, and 4/18/2013 Opposed
then need social services to supplement.
7 (a) - 37
I just found out, and filled out, this Kitchener casino proposal4/18/2013 Opposed
active in politics or political events but I must speak up as a citizen of Kitchener, as a
person of faith (Christian) who morally opposes gambling and as
rural congregation.
Casinos are all bright lights and a place of dreams, a place for
promoters would have you believe. And yes, the casinos would fill the coffers of the
local governments. But at what price?
It is historically well established that gambling venues attract
prostitution, and violence. But even more than that, persons whoe
participating in a regressive tax. Maybe some can afford it, but
benefits? Those investors already wealthy. Who is devastated? Th
who live in poor conditions because the money is being used for -than-life-
giving purposes. Yes, that is already happening in our towns and cities
compound this tragedy with an even greater evil?
I wish to be on record as registering my strong disapproval. The
should be campaigning for (or against) but this is one issue that has made me take
action.
Just think if the OLG can summarily close down race tracks acros4/18/2013 Opposed
because of taking away shares of funding --- what is to stop them from closing a
casino here when with one in Toronto, one in Hamilton, one in London and one in
our region (besides the ones already in Windsor, Niagara falls,
casino loses money because no one uses it???? What a waste. En
council and the region instead to support the horse racing industry and our rural
brothers and sisters who are crying foul because their slots wer
money for Ontario--the racing industry improved attendance and grew and now it is
all gone for want of a casino in the big city.
There is only so much money people can spend. Let's support our rural fam
instead demand the money be returned to the racing industry.
No Casino here
I don't believe a casino would be a wise addition to the city. Iit 4/19/2013 Opposed
would attract tourists, because there are several other casinos
much more widely advertised (Niagara) and others are also being
more likely that if a casino is built in KW it will have local cs I'm
stereotyping, but I believe that casinos do more harm than good
of clients are not local. Having 2 universities (plus another on
AND several colleges), Waterloo houses a very young population incial
situation. While I don't have stats to back it up (though I will
believe that introducing a casino will increase tourism revenue,
the city resources through increased crime rate, addictions counnd health
services. I believe it will also reflect on the student scores a-secondary
institutions, dropping them in the province university rankings
enrollment.
We are opposed to having a casino in Kitchener for a several reasons. Thank you for 4/19/2013 Opposed
inviting our input.
7 (a) - 38
Firstly I would like to express that I speak as an 18 year old female who has known a 4/19/2013 Opposed
Kitchener resident that has a gambling addiction and frequents c
Southern Ontario.
In regard to discussion about Kitchener hosting a casino, I supp
because of its potential economic value and the positive effect
Kitchener's tourism industry. I recognize that residents are con
potential social issues that could develop and/or propagate from
casino. As well I recognize the fear that it will pull consumers
local businesses/entertainment institutions. To this I would lik
any person who wishes to gamble can/will drive to one of the curre
in Southern Ontario. For those without a vehicle, there are enou- bus tours
available for people to use to reach a casino.
In summary, gamblers will continue to gamble whether there is a casino in Kitchener
or not. It is only logical that Kitchener take advantage of the
casino. If people are already gambling Kitchener should have the
money in the region rather than other areas. The city already deals with the
negatives (I.e. needing to provide counseling to addicts). Furth
that a casino would increase social problems is comparable to pr
LCBO will create alcoholics. This belief that the presence of a casino creating
uncontrollable-gambling addicts overnight completely overlooks the fact addicti
are rooted in issues such as poverty and mental illness, NOT the
casino.
While I support the final decision of the city Councillors I hope this input helps your
consideration of this issue.
Here's an idea! Let's try to help make the LRT successful wit4/19/2013 Suggestion
casino on its route, preferably between Kitchener and Cambridge,
extension of the rail portion into Cambridge. This would have hundreds of be
for the whole region.
Would like to pre-tape your response on your thoughts on having a public 4/19/2013 None
consultation on having a casino. Yes? No?
I'm writing to express my personal opinion and not the company's I'm cont4/19/2013 Support
I am a resident and homeowner in Ward 7.I'm not a gambler
I am in favour of willing to host the casino, for the following
-Kitchener will probably bear the brunt of any additional "social costs" that the casino
might generate, and so we may as well get the economic benefits
your colleagues raised this point on Monday.
- I don't think it should be a "moral" decision to be willing or nhe
Prov Liberals have already made that decision - the casino is going to be built
somewhere within our region, so let's work on extracting maximum
benefit to Kitchener and the region from their decision.
-It's a new revenue stream. These don't come along every day.
-develop the casino with hotels/convention centre and near other
points (Bingemens' for example). Bring tourists into the region.
their gambling problems back to their hometown.)
-A casino is a sin tax, no different than LCBO stores, and cigarettes - no one
complained when they extended LCBO hours and built new stores to
convenient for their clients to purchase more alcohol.
7 (a) - 39
It scares me that the debate has been reopened on whether or not Kitchener should 4/19/2013 Opposed
have a casino. You made the correct decision the first time.
Please . . . stay strong, and focus on the overall good of the c
being swayed by arguments of short-term financial gain. Ask: At what price? For
how long?
Listen to the Region's Public Health policy statement on Gamblin
community healthy!
How are you? As a citizen in your ward, I'm not in favour of a p4/19/2013 Opposed
believe we could take advantage of one a couple of times a year. (During Bluesfest
and Oktoberfest) The social impact on a community is well docume
take advantage of the influx of outside visitors by giving them
festival casinos. I don't think those against casinos could disagree if gamblers are
given the opportunity to play a couple of times a year.
Personally I believe the Provincial Government (OLC's) approach
casinos is a lazy way to raise taxes on the Citizens of Ontario. Kitchener is a city that
support a government's lazy approach (one that goes after the un
raise taxes. We're better than that.
But we can a couple times a year to keep everyone happy
Am very opposed to a Casino in Kitchener - do not agree that it would bring tourism 4/22/2013 Opposed
dollars to the community, only addiction and hardship to countle
their families - we already have enough in very close proximity to Kitchener
Not sure you'll remember me - we met briefly whilst touring the renovated 4/22/2013 Opposed
Methadone Clinic facility on Park near Mt. Hope St. I live on Mt
and children.
I wanted to write to you quickly regarding the idea of placing a casino here
Kitchener. I am vehemently opposed to this and can think of no w
community.
Not being a fan of this plan yourself, I am sure you are well aw
that a casino would simply ruin this wonderful city, so I won't get int
(though if you would like to discuss this further I'd be happy t
I don't believe a casino fits with the kind of community we're h
believe that the potential financial benefits a casino might claim to offer wi
close to outweighing the financial and incalculable social damag
bring to the community.
This is not simply something you do to build and sustain a stroncommunity
- ask any urban planner.
I likely won't be able to attend the public meeting in April, so
everything you can to keep Kitchener growing in the right direct
Would like to interview Scott because his ward contains Bingeman's, a business that 4/22/2013 None
is interested in possibly locating OLG to its grounds.
7 (a) - 40
I live in your ward in Kitchener and would like you to know that4/22/2013 Opposed
a casino. And, also I do not want resources wasted on a public consultation about it.
However, if council plans to move ahead with a casino I would li
a public consultation. I hope this makes sense. Thanks for the
ward
I am horrified a casino is even being discussed. Gambling is entertainment to few 4/22/2013 Opposed
and pipe dreams to many. A tax on those who do not understand t
disaster to relationships and horrible consequences for families
Casinos present an opportunity for draining money from families who need it by
seducing those ill-advised souls who think they can "make money" throwing their
money at games of chance. This is a million steps backwards in
region. Vote against this and lets get on with productive work.
Called to say he is strongly opposed to having a casino in Regio 4/22/2013 Opposed
Unable to access the online survey. Am definitely opposed to a casino in our area. 4/22/2013 Opposed
Recently went to the casino in Sault Ste. Marie during the busy fall
season....very few people there. It is not much of an attractio
there...the novelty seems to have worn off. Victoria Street location (Bingeman's)
would increase the traffic there...busy enough now.
I vote NO regarding the possibility of the establishment of a casino in th4/22/2013 Opposed
area, and, in fact, the Waterloo Region.
- A casino is an unethical way to raise revenue for any purpose.
- I understand that the city would receive a very small percentagethe revenue
"gained" from a casino. Even if the city received a larger porti
health and counseling services and the loss to personal and fami
outweigh any so-called benefit to the city. Surely, there would be a huge increase in
policing costs as well due to crimes associated with the gamblin
- A casino is an open invitation to promote gambling, an addiction
consequences, often affecting the poorest and most vulnerable am
- A casino mentality is counter-productive to the high value Kitchener/Waterloo
places on universities, study and research. Should a casino be
Lazaridis' fine vision of turning this area into "Quantum Valley
a less honourable "Gambling, Addiction and Crime Valley" instead.
For the betterment of our community, I urge you to vote NO regar
amount of money gained is worth the devastation that gambling pr
As a home owner, small business owner, and have an interest in the future of the 4/23/2013 None
City of Kitchener, I very much want council to say YES to listen
hear the facts on what they are proposing.
I want to thank the City of Kitchener for creating the Casino survey and giving 4/23/2013 Opposed
residents in the area an opportunity to voice their opinion on t
I would urge you and city officials to view a recent program on -Ontario. The
Agenda with Steve Paikin on April 8, 2013 was entitled "Should Tto the
Casino Business". The discussion and questions would provide so
to "Should Kitchener get into the Casino Business". My personal opinions on the
7 (a) - 41
matter are:
1. It would hurt the image of our region, which is promoted as "Country".
2. Social problems caused by alcoholism and gambling far outweig
economic benefits.
3. City is vulnerable to a high degree of risk. Casinos are not
what is happening to casinos in Atlantic City.
Thank you for giving me the opportunity to share my thoughts.
As someone who grew up in pre-casino Niagara Falls, I still have friends and relatives 4/25/2013 Opposed
who can tell me what it's all about. My comments are anecdotal
people who have told me these things have no reason to lie.
In addition to consulting with Brantford officials, the city mig
with Niagara Falls officials.
Here are some things I have heard, in no particular order:
- people who lose everything 'fall' into the gorge and their deaths are
'hushed up.'
- people who work on 'the floor' of Fallsview casino are fired for
(not smiling enough) because there are 'people lining up to take
job"
- since the casino operates 24/7, casino workers do not normally get weekends off,
or Christmas or anything else. I have relatives who are a husba
work at Fallsview. They do not even get the same days off after
never a weekend. They have 2 children and finding child care for their work hours is
a challenge
- one acquaintance was being interviewed for a higher level job wi
department and was told that if she got this job she could never
the floor because she would 'know too much' about what really goes on
- in the security office there are lists of names of high rollers
habits.
- my friend from Waterloo went to Niagara Falls for the weekend an
me that to get from her hotel, to the restaurant, to the casino, she did not have
to go outside. Therefore, there is no way that a pre-existing local business
would benefit from casino patrons.
- I have been inside both Fallsview casino and Sault Ste Marie cas
Im not sure where you go to in this site to post your feelings abou4/25/2013 Support
our area, but if this email gets to the right place I feel it would benefi
and add jobs, which we have so lost in the factory industry.
7 (a) - 42
I feel strongly that a casino in the city of Kitchener or in any ar4/25/2013 Opposed
adjacent to the city is not a good fit for this area at all. The
associated with a facility of that kind, and the extra revenue i I
have read in the newspaper the suggestion that this is a done de
hope that is not the case. The entire region needs to stand toge
Kitchener does have a voice.
Just because OLG intends to license a casino in our region doesn't mean we have to 4/25/2013 Opposed
be pitted against one another in the process. Threatening that "hey, these jobs are
going to go elsewhere if not here..." belies the fact that a uni
opposition to such a wrong path forward for job creation and regional development
is still possible and we can collectively tell OLG NOT in Waterl
Studies show that the money that feeds casino owners' hunger for
mostly from within the host region, not from international visitors or folks from far
away specifically to visit a casino in Waterloo Region. Really? - those
dollars will be coming from Ontarians. Studies also indicate tha
- cation" activities, extra leisure items and eating out
which drive LOCAL economy.
It has been proven that casinos suck the wealth out of a communi4/25/2013 Opposed
of other problems. Since you the council, have blown your wad on
doesn't take a rocket scientist ( maybe more than accountant) to figur
the money has to stay here to pay for the albatross called the L
Would like comments prior to pic tonight 4/25/2013 None
Please advise the email address for the form "Casino Consultation Survey". I have 4/25/2013 Opposed
some other questions:
1. Why does the form ask for the household income and highest le
for the person completing the form? How is this information rele
at hand? If one chooses not to provide this information, is the feedback n
into account?
2. Why is the email address flashed on the CKCO screen for only
long enough to locate a pen and paper)? The public has not been
time or clear information on how to provide feedback before the
tomorrow night.
3. If I complete the paper form that I was forced to pick up at
and mail it to you, it will not reach you before the meeting. Wit then be construed
that I am in favour or opposed to the casino? I think I know th
4. Please provide the email address for Paul Singh so that I ca
adamantly opposed to the casino. I have no confidence in your preiving
feedback through your survey form.
It appears to me that the casino will be stuffed down our throat
that we were gifted with the light rail transit. Two wrongs do n
should we count on one mistake to pay for another.
7 (a) - 43
Whether or not there is a referendum on the question of a casino4/29/2013 Opposed
would like you to know that I am strongly opposed to a casino he
the district, for that matter. I believe that it would provide no lasting benefit for the
city and would, in fact, hinder the slow and steady work being d
downtown.
In addition, a casino is out of keeping with the image of our ci
Visitors are drawn here by such things as festivals celebrating the making of apple
butter and maple syrup, for cheese , pies, beautiful quilts, far
for one wild week, Oktoberfest. They spend money when they come,
stays here to be used in the community. Our well-being is based on wholesomeness,
not sophistication.
I ask you, as mayor of our city, to remember these points when t
discussed. Please do whatever you can to protect us from outside
imposing false values on our city and undermining its prosperity.
4/29/2013 Opposed
Please vote no tonight to considering a casino in Kitchener.
I do not want a casino in Kitchener. 4/29/2013 Opposed
The following Globe and Mail Article published at 3am on March 25th. Clearly shows 4/29/2013 Opposed
that Ontario's Casinos are sliding into a trend of losing more a
generating revenues well below what was initially expected.
Global trends show similar trends as relayed in my previous correspondence to you
regarding this matter.
Casinos are a dying industry. The one we have in Elmira is enoug
How sick and demented our Ontario Government is. With the econom4/29/2013 Opposed
shape and their revenue down, they have resorted to swindling the people of Ontario
out of their savings. They are also hypocrites. They have known for years that we
Canadians are not saving enough money for retirement and for oth
allow us to deposit money into a tax free savings account to aid us in saving money at
the same time opening up casinos to get at this saved money, be
other savings account to generate revenue. I did not think that they would stoop so
low. They come across as organized crime. This action will come back to haunt the
Government in the future when us old folks retire with less savi
on to the government to support us, then where do they find the Open up
more casinos?
Please do not fall into their trap. They are sprinkling fairy dust on your heads.
7 (a) - 44
I wish to voice my opinion regarding any proposed casino in the 4/29/2013 Opposed
I feel that a casino in Kitchener (or anywhere) does more harm t
money made by casinos comes from those who can least afford it, and comes a
cost to the community in the form of gambling addictions. For
it, I would hope that disposable income would be spent locally i
entertainment.
It is my hope that the city of Kitchener would reject the idea of havi
When I was a child, my parents (wise and community-minded people) told me that 4/29/2013 Opposed
gambling is wrong, that it preys upon people weaker instincts, and is based on a
faulty principle. Now that I am a senior and have had a lifeti
am convinced that they were right.
Like many, I am concerned about the possibility of a casino comi
because of what it will do to the people involved, and because of the negative image
it will give our community.
In these days of financial pressures I am sure it is very tempti
look at casinos as means of generating revenue. My point is tha
supposed revenues were such as have been estimated by some, the casino would sti
be wrong, wrong in principle and wrong for our community.
Please give the public a voice, perhaps a referendum on the ballot of the next
municipal election?
I oppose the proposition to bring a casino to the Region of Waterloo. I am ag4/29/2013 Opposed
on several grounds.
Firstly, there is a promise of windfall cash for governments. Bu
democracy says everyone should shoulder their share of the cost The
casino model hopes that some citizens will throw away money from
community will benefit. Except all citizens will bear the associ
consequences of gambling.
Secondly, casino revenue is not a stable source of funding. As the economy
deteriorates, citizen contributions to casino revenues also fall. But the social
consequences raise with the level of despair just at a time that
services are cut back.
Basing our future on the vagaries of casinos is illogical t citizens
feel any obligation to pay for the services of government? Most
not troubled by taxation policies when shown that tax revenues a
I urge you, in the interests of good community leadership, to vote no to any further
discussion of casinos.
In support of the casino, would like to see it at Bingeman's. Sh4/30/2013 Support
facilities, and will go no matter where they are located. She wa
Says no to a casino in Kitchener, or anywhere else in the Region. She feels4/30/2013 Opposed
one in Elora is ample.
7 (a) - 45
I am concerned that easier access to a casino may lead to increa4/30/2013 Opposed
gambling in our community which stresses families and potentially increases crime.
Casinos seem to be a quick way to increase revenue for local gov
replace a more creative and long term commitment to developing a
community. I believe communities that have a thriving arts/sporteed
casinos.
Take a walk through downtown Brantford and witness the impact of
boarded up, the casino beautifully situated by the river, a coup
universities.....and, that's it! There's no cultural development
How does a casino fit with the vision of the community as a tech and
Against 4/30/2013 Opposed
Dear Mr. Zehr! We want to let you know that we are strongly agai4/30/2013 Opposed
Kitchener and K-W area. Much more money goes out of this area than comes in. It
takes advantage of the weak citizens who hope to make a fortune
the money they so badly need. It creates more problems than it p
Absolute NO gambling!
As a home owner, small business owner, and have an interest in the future of the 4/30/2013 Support
City of Kitchener, I very much want council to say YES to listen
hear the facts on what they are proposing.
Kitchener or any other municipality should not aid and abet the Province of Ontario 4/30/2013 Opposed
losing its horse racing tracks and the horse fanciers losing their investments by
playing along with the images of possible big money to be earned by towns and cities
as dangled before each town and city by OLG. Have a look at attached article, please.
The people of Kitchener need jobs so say yes to a Casino and say4/30/2013 Support
Hub Casino, it's a win win!
7 (a) - 46
Please consider these comments and share them at the regional level as necessary. 4/30/2013 Opposed
The communities in Waterloo region are too interlinked to believe
city will have no impact in another. casinos have no place in or
and the OLGs attempt to spread gambling through this province is
attempt at capitalizing on the current levels of financial instability f
students, and workers, and others in Ontario.
Casinos bring increased stresses and negative impacts by targeti
youth/students, and others, with illusions of success. casinos are unlikely (based on
results from everywhere else) to pull their weight in terms of t
associated with casinos (addiction counseling; suicide preventio
counseling; costs associated with increased numbers of financially unstable people -
property theft in neighbourhoods, cash register robberies; incre
organized capitalism - hard/chemical drugs, loansharking, pimping and human
trafficking, bodyguards/thugs; etc).
Brantford downtown is not being revitalized by the casino, the
revitalization/gentrification that is happening is due to the us
profits from the casino to upgrade a building which brought WLU
into the area - ne (though we already
have that other one in UW or Conestoga).
There are already people in our downtowns; the gentrification projects are already
underway. Casinos suck money from local businesses by taking recreational m
which would have been spent in restaurants, shops, etc. another overlooked
"externality" of casinos is they bring in more hock shops and ca
prey off of desperation, and are otherwise pretty ugly/useless s
downtown/uptown.
The other day I read the article in the K-W Record with regard to Mark Bingeman and 4/30/2013 Support
putting the casino on Bingeman property. Most importantly Mark's idea of saying
yes to a meeting to lay all cards on the table is an absolute mu
In my opinion, Mark Bingeman is the most astute business man, not to mention very
successful. Should Mark think for one minute we would not all b
believe me he would never get involved.
He made his point very strongly, we should at least listen.
I realize Carl you are a very busy man to say the least, but I would lik
for taking the time to read this email.
Take care and hopefully I will hear from you soon.
I don't believe a casino for the city is a good move. I know ot jurisdictions are 4/30/2013 Opposed
seeing this as a money making (seen as tax reduction move) but w?
There will have to be more police available, more help for addit
and most likely other social services. In addition I see this asve to try and get a
portion of a smaller and smaller gambling pot (there are just so
dollars available). We have available currently gambling in Elo
Falls, and others within a two hour drive.
My vote is NO to this.
7 (a) - 47
I would like to state my opposition to having a casino in Kitche 4/30/2013 Opposed
Much time & money has been spent to revitalize our city & in my
directions would be undermined by a casino.
It is unfortunate that this issue is splitting up the Region instead of strengthening
it.
I am also concerned about the partnerships with private enterpri4/30/2013 Opposed
gambling. Gambling is illegal under the criminal code. There i
government provided and regulated gambling. The private sector partnership is
dangerous because corporations have only a profit motive and do
social responsibility as government.
There is an easy way to protect problem gamblers and the tools ato do so
today. OLG already has reward cards that track frequency of pl
spent. Every slot machine and table is set up to track activity
use of cards mandatory. Gamblers would be required to provide p
taxable income as a condition of play. Each gambler would then b
spend/lose 10% of their reported income in any given year. The
simple approaches are not used is telling. Obviously other simp
available. The fact that ineffective programs are used by OLG tells us they w
revenue from problem gamblers.
Thank you for taking the time to read this.
April 17 - Howard sent an article from a magazine called "Charisma" out of 4/30/2013 Suggestion
He is hoping it will shed some light on the issue of casinos; th
community.
March 27 - agrees with the consultation process, however does not want to see a 4/30/2013 Opposed
casino in the Region. She would prefer it to be a referendum que
election.
Have worked in addictions, and have seen first-hand the impact it has on the lives of 4/30/2013 Opposed
others. These are not our community values.
Good for the city 4/30/2013 Opposed
Doris and her spouse both came on the phone to advise that they are not ok with 4/30/2013 Opposed
having a casino in Kitchener.
7 (a) - 48
5/1/2013 Opposed
It seems to me that the revenue sharing that the Ontario Lottery and Gaming
Corporation (OLG) has offered with the host city is grossly inad
increase the cities share revenue decreases from 5.5% to 0.5%, a
the tables. This means that the host city gets about $4 million and the OLG nets
about $130 million dollars. This sounds like a deal that an oil
with a third world dictator.
Net profits work out to about $350,000 daily, for every day of t
being pulled out of the region. That's awful lot money that won't be spent upon
other goods and services in the community. Initially there will
paying service jobs, but this will be offset shortly, from layof
the other employers affected by the casinos $350,000 per day money drain.
The anticipated $4 million addition to city coffers will also be
increased costs of policing, fire, ambulance, counseling, welfar
surges, classroom teaching materials, and programs for children affected by gambling
addicted parents. Don't forget spin off crime and youth offence
result from the impoverishment of those newly introduced to gamb
decreased tax revenues from business failures. There could end up being only a
minor pecuniary gain or most likely a net loss to the host city.
I grudgingly go to OLG casinos about once a year with friends, b
entertainment value in losing money, which is the net result of
visits. Casinos don't thrive upon occasional sensible gamblers who walk
hundred or so that they can afford to lose, and walk out after i
regular clients with serious money. They even give them special
slot machines and various perks.
Assuming that there are about 100,000 adults in the region, they
gamble about $50 per week for the city to get its $4 million. By
you 17 plays on a $3 machine, for a possible $1000 jackpot. This is about 5 minutes
worth of "fun" and there are very few jackpot winners.
Our city fathers are now gambling - a paltry jackpot for expanded social malaise.
Once the casino is voted in, it can't be voted out, just as thos
gambling addiction can't be totally rehabilitated. Unfortunately if this casi
in, the odds are that you who endorsed it, or some of own family
cursed by your choice. When you discover your possessions have b
ucky Day" then you will begin to realize the error of your vote.
Our region is prosperous and should be kept OLG FREE. We're not
community or some border town that needs to suck resources from
off communities or foreign tourists. Hopefully all of those entrusted with the future
of Waterloo Region will see the casino offer for what it is, A L
and vote to keep us OLG FREE.
Note: The estimates and other financial data used here were most
calculated approximately from published Record articles.
7 (a) - 49
I oppose a casino in Kitchener and in Waterloo Region. I don't 5/1/2013 Opposed
economic benefit to the city or the region - because jobs do not pay that well and the
gamblers do not purchase goods and services locally. This was our finding wh
wanted to put slot machines in Woolwich at the Elmira Raceway ma
The region will need to pay the social costs if the casino and s
region.
Former Waterloo Mayor Brian Turnbull said years ago when the Elmira
considered. "All I hear is a giant sucking sound between the sl
Queen's Park." I think casinos and slot machines are a governme
obtain monies, but cause much social and economic harm.
I did fill out the form for Kitchener! I am one of your constit
both opposed but she has not registered her concerns; she doesn'
I have completed my survey with regard to a local casino, and stated that I was in 5/1/2013 Opposed
favour of proceeding with the process. I did watch the parts of
where concerned delegates presented their opinions to council.
There seems to be a lot of opposition to the idea. I may be opposed to bars and
liquor and strip clubs and massage parlors and smoking and those
products, but my views do not affect those who chose to be enter
businesses.
I think that we could use the profits from a casino in our area for light rail transit. I
think we've been missing the boat here for years. I do feel for those who develop
addictions; they have chosen difficult paths. But the rest of us
experiencing life to protect this sad minority.
That is, in Kitchener, roughly 10,000 adults are suffering in this wa5/1/2013 Opposed
friends, our neighbours, our colleagues.
As researchers expand the study of problem gambling, what comes
arises due to a perfect storm: access to close gambling facilities encourages people to
go to them more often; the design of electronic gambling machine
more compelling for a longer time to a wider audience; and human
encourages addiction. A local casino will make the first part ohis storm more
available for more people.
I could tell you about ¿losses disguised as wins¿ or ¿PAR tables
on the psychological effects of playing multi-line slot machines versus older single-
line machines. I will instead suggest reading Natasha Dow Schüll's recent book
Addiction by Design: Machine Gambling in Las Vegas, which was st
its exploration of how many ways casinos have built addiction in
(You can also hear her on the design podcast "99% Invisible" at
http://tinyurl.com/99dowschull.)
The core positive outcomes for a local casino would be the jobs created (though
theyre bad jobs; OLG is getting out of the business of running gambl
civil servants, so new casinos jobs are low-wage and part-time), and the small share
of gambling losses returned to the community. However, the losst outweigh
the costs to our families. I urge you to reject this casino in
7 (a) - 50
I hope never to see a Casino built in this City. Gleaning proceeds from the addiction 5/1/2013 Opposed
of citizens, calling it revenue and charitable donations to orga
'speaking with a forked tongue', which aids and abets the ills o
citizens, while posing under the guise of "needed finances to support charity and
necessary community development". Surely there are more creativ
entrusted with the piloting of our community, to use business ac
to create environments for revenue that do not assist in the unhappy demise of our
neighbours. Casinos are a quick fix cash flow which creates out
and Support Care systems of this nation. A vice in a vicious ci
Contending that people with addictions will find ways to fill them, and continuing to
feed the insatiable quest for winning money, and fast thrills, f
society, is NOT a reason to build a Casino. Governing bodies sh
supporting, building or otherwise involved in Casinos. The outcome to human
demise outweighs the income and lifestyle that supports Casinos.
We are writing to you about the possibility of a casino coming t5/1/2013 Opposed
say right up front that we are opposed to it in every way. Afterg many articles
on this topic we agree that casinos are often called a tax on th
struggling with addictions. Since we are involved in a church an
hours and much money to helping the poor and needy in our commun
does not represent our values or, we feel, the values of our com
and continues to do a good job at cleaning up the core and chang
the downtown, and encouraging prosperity through economic develo
enjoy Centre in the Square and Drayton Entertainment. A casino will compete w
these venues, having another focus than engaging the community i
way. We are concerned by Ken Seilings comment, Its been my experience,
anywhere the OLG moves, communities get torn apart. (Kitchener Post, March 8,
2013) We have lived in the Region most of our lives. We love it
that a casino will add any value to our lives or the lives of ou
I have been discussing the idea of a casino coming to Kitchener with family, frien5/2/2013 Support
and co-workers. The debate begins with a simple question on my part, "would you
others are on the fence. I have yet to run into anyone who says a flat out "NO".
I believe that the people I engage in conversations with are int
fact that a small percentage of them are hesitant to give me an
they have yet to do any research or have yet to be presented with research that
proves that a city can benefit from having a casino. Others are
taxpayer dollars are footing the bill. From news articles it is 's
is pushing for a casino to be built there; I have no problem with that because it is
private property and that tells me that tax payer dollars will n
I have done my own research and my conclusion is that a city lik
benefit immensely from having a casino. More jobs, more tax revenue, more to offer
tourists and surrounding communities and the fact that we would
Kitcheners entertainment dollars in Kitchener. A Casino in our jurisdicti
make sure Kitchener gets the benefits instead of Woolwich.
I encourage you all to have an open mind and to listen to your c
contemplating the idea of a casino in Kitchener. The pros outwei
7 (a) - 51
I write you in two roles. First, I am a citizen of Kitchener, we I have lived since 5/2/2013 Opposed
2001; last year, I joined the downtown renaissance, and moved to
Belmont Village. Im a happy resident, delighted by the last few years¿
developments here.
Second, I write in my professional capacity. While my primary expertise is in
computer science, I recently started doing some joint work with
Research Laboratory at the University of Waterloo, on how change
gambling technology influence addictive behaviour. As a consequ
getting up to speed on this literature in the past few months.
I was troubled to hear that local municipalities were considerin
place a casino here. While it is more responsible than some cas
attempting to ameliorate the negative societal consequences of gambling, casinos,
which earn their profits through gambling losses, are not good n
Research generally suggests that roughly 5-6% of the population show ¿problem
gambling¿ or ¿disordered gambling¿ (the latter is more serious) at any given time;
this is roughly 20% of the fraction of the population that actua
problem gamblers provide (by various studies¿ estimates) between
gambling profits. That is, in Kitchener, roughly 10,000 adults are suffering in this way.
These are our friends, our neighbours, our colleagues.
Casinos are most frequently used by people who can least afford 5/2/2013 Opposed
negative impact on the family.
Antithetical to genuine creativity and viable growth 5/2/2013 Opposed
Antithetical to genuine creativity and viable growth 5/2/2013 Opposed
Antithetical to genuine creativity and viable growth 5/2/2013 Opposed
Antithetical to genuine creativity and viable growth 5/2/2013 Opposed
Antithetical to genuine creativity and viable growth 5/2/2013 Opposed
Antithetical to genuine creativity and viable growth 5/2/2013 Opposed
Antithetical to genuine creativity and viable growth 5/2/2013 Opposed
Antithetical to genuine creativity and viable growth 5/2/2013 Opposed
Antithetical to genuine creativity and viable growth 5/2/2013 Opposed
Antithetical to genuine creativity and viable growth 5/2/2013 Opposed
Antithetical to genuine creativity and viable growth 5/2/2013 Opposed
5/2/2013 Opposed
Negative basis to build our economy. Not showing foresight re fu5/2/2013 Opposed
Gambling fastest growing addiction among our youth, Admission of
our future.
I am very concerned and embarrassed that Kitchener is considering a casino. 5/2/2013 Opposed
I have family members that have gambling addictions and very con
close would make these issues worse.
I don't see this helping our community one bit. If it is to brin
community isn't there another way to boost our city economy without bringing in
something that brings so much addiction and heart ache to so man
7 (a) - 52
I read the article in the paper that Bingeman's are interested i5/2/2013 Support
their property. I think that is a great idea for our city.
I have many friends that make a weekend out of visiting Niagara
enjoy the amenities the casinos in those cities have to offer. I
those friends would prefer to save the money on gas to have a night out here in
Kitchener and then spend the money they would have spent on gas
out.
The money leaving Kitchener would then stay in Kitchener - I think that would benefit
our city in the long run for sure.
I hope people can see the many benefits a casino in our city offers and use log
instead of emotion to make a decision on this.
5/2/2013 Opposed
We want to let you know that we are strongly against a casino in-W 5/2/2013 Opposed
area. Much more money goes out of this area than comes in. It takes advantage of
the weak citizens who hope to make a fortune and gamble their mo
badly need. It creates more problems than it promises to solve.
gambling!
Mr. Mayor, 5/2/2013 Opposed
You have made your position clear that we ought not to have a cas
applaud that stance and urge you to do what you can to ensure th
casino in the entire region. Just wanted you to know that I sup
Listening to CBC this morning the topic was the casino in the Re5/2/2013 Opposed
The comment was, if a casino is opened up here in the Region theihood
Elora would shut down. Has anyone spoken to North Wellington to
would feel about losing their casino? Apparently another option mi
Elora, rather than build a new one here. Have I missed this par
Was this mentioned by council or reported in the Record? When w
close, why would one community even think of doing this to another???
majority of ratepayers not already said no to having a casino he
did Woolwich kick the horse track out of Elmira when the gamblin
added? Was the current Woolwich council even listening to their residents? Is th
Kitchener council going to listen to us?? Leave the OLG in Elor
you in the long run.
What can I say!!! Kitchener has had some high notes and decades n the dumps. It 5/2/2013 Opposed
has taken tons of effort and loads of money to renew and revital
So why throw it all away with a casino???
A part of that re building is in image making and in defining a
marketable sense of character. Some of that has been through educational
institutions, technology spin offs and support for the arts. A l
quality of purpose and modernized urban livability as in the fut
A casino might seem to you like a quick fix for a few bucks but to me it just looks
like a long term sucker trap.
entrepreneur ladder than a casino at Binge
7 (a) - 53
All gambling machines/games are fixed against the participant; I will NOT participate 5/2/2013 Opposed
in casinos knowing that the machines/games are fixed against me.
infrastructure: the opulent buildings, outside and inside, the m
exorbitant salaries, the promised $sum to the willing host municipality, the profit to
the gaming house, - - not much left for the gambler,- if he/she is lucky.
Another article in The Record, said that to guarantee the willin
$60 million, $180 million has to be "taken in",- pardon the pun. Where will this $180
million come from? Conceivably money that would be normally be u
goods and services from other businesses, including monies that
charities. Businesses and charities would suffer. Also quoted in The Record, 5% of
that estimated input would come from problem gamblers, which in
to be covered by rehab services for gambling addictions. Gamblin
ruin relationships and destroy finance savings. The media has rea number
of casinos in Ontario are closing because there has been a serio
to meet all the expenses as required, stated above. Why gamble w
is fixed against the player??
DEAD MAN¿S HAND: Just Say NO to Casinos! 5/2/2013 Opposed
Your voice can make a difference ~ its not too late! On April 15th go to the City of
Kitchener website www.cityofkitchener.ca and reply to the online
know that the good citizens of the Region of Waterloo ¿ all of iwant a
casino here. Research it for yourself. Where there are casinos
addiction and loss; more crime; and more suicide. Is this what
here? Send this to friends and family. Starting April 15th ¿ j
and keep saying NO until our voices are heard.
Councillor Davey, while I am not a resident of Kitchener, I oper5/2/2013 Support
ward. I would like to express my support for the concept of bui
Bingeman complex. This area is already an entertainment and recreation centre and
is not adjacent to any residential, institutional or educational
transportation access and seems to fit the bill for such an unde
idea of a casino in general I believe that it would create jobs of a type that
currently needed in the area. While social costs are a concern,
be directed to correct these and many more social problems in th
believe that a well-managed casino can be a great benefit to the city financially and
socially.
I just want to register my strongest opposition to having casino 5/2/2013 Opposed
I wish to express my opposition to a Casino in Kitchener or anywin the Region. I 5/3/2013 Opposed
go to Elora 2 or 3 times per year and am amazed at the number of
to get more money from the ATM.
I believe that this will be a major problem if we get one in Kit
I wish to express my solid opposition to a casino in Kitchener. 5/3/2013 Opposed
No to casino. 5/3/2013 Opposed
John and I want to add our names to the list of Kitchenerites wh5/6/2013 Opposed
categorically the building of a casino in Kitchener, and in fact
Region. We agree with James Howe's stance on this - he said it so well last week.
Why break people so you have to fix them?
Kitchener has done so much to create and maintain a healthy comm
I understand I have missed the on-line survey. I would still like my "no" vote to be 5/6/2013 Opposed
counted.
7 (a) - 54
Although unable to attend the public hearing last week, I would 5/6/2013 Opposed
absolute disapproval of a casino in Kitchener-Waterloo or anywhere within Waterloo
Region.
Survey received after cutoff date. 5/6/2013 Support
Survey received after cutoff date. 5/6/2013 Support
Survey received after cutoff date. 5/6/2013 Opposed
Survey received after cutoff date. 5/6/2013 Opposed
Survey received after cutoff date. 5/6/2013 Opposed
Survey received after cutoff date. 5/6/2013 Opposed
Survey received after cutoff date. 5/6/2013 Opposed
Against having a casino, and against having it at Bingeman's as 5/7/2013 Opposed
Against having a casino. 5/7/2013 Opposed
Have lived in other communities with casinos and while they brin5/7/2013 Opposed
it increases the need for social services. Don't want to add ano
i.e. gambling addicts.
Mental problems can happen 5/7/2013 Opposed
Against. 5/7/2013 Opposed
7 (a) - 55