HomeMy WebLinkAboutCSD-13-064 - Heritage Permit Application HPA-2013-IV-009 - Alteration of Schoerg Barn FoundationStaff Report
I r Community Services Department wvwuukitchenerra
REPORT TO: Heritage Kitchener
DATE OF MEETING: June 4, 2013
SUBMITTED BY: Brandon Sloan, Manager of Long Range & Policy Planning
PREPARED BY: Michelle Drake, Heritage Planner (519- 741 -2200 ext. 7839)
WARD(S) INVOLVED: 3
DATE OF REPORT: May 28, 2013
REPORT NO.: CSD -13 -064
SUBJECT: Heritage Permit Application HPA- 2013 -IV -009
Joseph Schoerg Crescent (Part of Lot 11 Beasley's Broken
Front Concession and Part 2 of Reference Plan 58R- 16275)
Proposed Barn Foundation Rehabilitation and
Improvements to the Surrounding Landscape
RECOMMENDATION:
That pursuant to Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Heritage Permit Application
HPA- 2013 -IV -009 be approved to permit the rehabilitation of the barn foundation and
improvements to the landscape at the property legally described as Part of Lot 11
Beasley's Broken Front Concession and Part 2 of Reference Plan 58R -16275 in
accordance with the plans and supporting information submitted with the application.
BACKGROUND:
The Community Services Department is in receipt of Heritage Permit Application HPA- 2013 -IV-
009. The applicant is seeking permission to rehabilitate the barn foundation and silo and to
improve the surrounding landscape at the property legally described as Part of Lot 11 Beasley's
Broken Front Concession and Part 2 of Reference Plan 58R- 16275.
REPORT:
The subject property is a City -owned park located on the south side of Joseph Schoerg
Crescent in the Pioneer Tower West community.
The Schoerg Barn foundation is one of two historic fieldstone foundations located immediately
east of Pioneer Memorial Tower. The fieldstone foundation of the adjacent c. 1830 Betzner Barn
was acquired by the City and was restored in 2010 as part of the development of an interpretive
feature completed in 2011. The fieldstone foundation of the Schoerg Barn was also acquired by
the City for the purpose of preserving its unique heritage attributes.
A Notice of Intention to designate was passed by Council in December 2004. The notice
identifies the following heritage attributes: the Schoerg Barn fieldstone foundation and concrete
silo; and, the cultural heritage landscape, including "the placement and relationship of the
fieldstone foundation with the neighbouring Schoerg farmhouse on top of the ridge of land, and
the lands featuring unobstructed views to the Grand River Valley which continue to feature
characteristics which originally influenced its settlement by the Mennonite pioneers including
rich fertile soils, a mixture of dense forest, open meadows, and proximity to water."
The City is proposing to rehabilitate the Schoerg Barn fieldstone foundation and silo and to improve
the surrounding landscape. The rehabilitation work is similar to the work completed on the Betzner
Barn fieldstone foundation.
The proposal will involve:
• Rehabilitation of the Schoerg Barn fieldstone foundation and silo, including:
• Adding a retaining wall below grade;
• Adding subgrade drainage;
• Replacing damaged and missing bricks and stones as required to match the existing;
• Repointing the foundation with a lime based mortar to match to match the existing;
• Adding a cut limestone capping to the foundation;
• Adding galvanized steel window frames to the existing window openings;
• Adding galvanized steel hand rails along the north wall;
• Removing the existing cistern, cinder block wall extension, concrete manger and divider;
• Replacing the existing floor with a granular material; and,
• Improvements to the surrounding landscape, including:
• Removing remnants sections of the white picket fence near the north east corner of the
property;
• Removing the concrete pad and ramp on the south side of the barn foundation;
• Removing the insulation and making safe the foundation of the remnant spring house;
• Installing an accessible concrete and stone dust pathway from the road to the rear of south
elevation of the foundation;
• Grading the site to improve surface drainage and direct slopes away from the barn
foundation;
• Removing buckthorn vegetation from the property;
• Removing all saplings and shrubs between the barn foundation and the retaining wall;
• Conserving in -situ the existing retaining wall;
• Constructing a paige -wire fence parallel to the retaining wall to delineate the steep slopes;
• Conserving in -situ the existing concrete structure located south of the retaining wall;
• Protecting large trees during construction; and,
• Installing interpretive signage.
In reviewing the merits of the application, Heritage Planning staff note the following:
• The rehabilitation work to the Schoerg Barn and improvements to the surrounding landscape
are similar to the works already completed for the adjacent Betzner Barn;
• The replacement of damaged bricks and stones will use reclaimed materials, where possible,
or new materials that visually match the existing Schoerg Barn fieldstone foundation;
• The cut limestone cap, window frames /grates and hand rails to be installed on the Schoerg
Barn fieldstone foundation and silo will be distinguishable from the original;
• The repointing of the Schoerg Barn fieldstone foundation will be completed with a lime based
mortar that matches the existing;
• The addition of a below grade retaining wall and the repointing of the Schoerg Barn fieldstone
foundation will stabilize the existing foundation and prevent further deterioration;
• The addition of a cut limestone cap to the Schoerg Barn fieldstone foundation, the addition of
below grade drainage and site grading will prevent further deterioration by directing water away
from the foundation wall;
• The replacement of damaged or missing bricks, the repointing of the fieldstone foundation, the
addition of window frames /grates to the foundation and silo, the addition of hand rails, the
removal of the cistern, the removal of the cinder block wall extension, the removal of the
concrete manger, the removal of the concrete divider and the construction of a new paige -wire
fence parallel to the retaining wall will increase public safety for visitors accessing the site;
• The installation of an accessible concrete and stone dust pathway from the road to the south
elevation of the foundation will provide safe public access to the site for users with various
mobility ranges;
• The removal of the insulation and works to stabilize the foundation of the remnant spring house
will conserve the resource for interpretation;
• The removal of overgrown and non - native vegetation will open access to the site; and,
• As a whole the rehabilitation work and landscape improvements will not negatively impact the
heritage attributes or detract from the character of the property.
ALIGNMENT WITH CITY OF KITCHENER STRATEGIC PLAN:
Community Priorities — Quality of Life and Development
The City has its own unique culture and heritage. The City has places, spaces and stories that
enrich, enlighten and guide growth and development. These cultural heritage resources are
integral to the identity of the City, but they also play a significant role in economic development
by helping to enhance quality of life, strengthen distinctiveness, stimulate revitalization and
attract tourism. Listing of non - designated property of cultural heritage value or interest on the
Municipal Heritage Register supports the Quality of Life Community Priority of the City of
Kitchener Strategic Plan by helping to nurture a sense of pride and community and promote
culture as both an economic driver and a central element of a healthy community. Listing on the
Municipal Heritage Register also supports the Development Community Priority to honour and
protect our heritage.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Funding for the conservation of the Schoerg Barn fieldstone foundation and improvements to
the landscape is available within current capital budget allotments.
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT:
Section 33(4) of the Ontario Heritage Act requires Council to consult with the Municipal Heritage
Committee (Heritage Kitchener) before consenting to a Heritage Permit Application, consenting
to a Heritage Permit Application on terms and conditions, or refusing a Heritage Permit
Application. Members of the community will be informed via circulation of the report to Heritage
Kitchener and via formal consideration by Council.
REVIEWED BY:
Leon Bensason, Coordinator, Cultural Heritage Planning
ACKNOWLEDGED BY: Alain Pinard, Director of Planning
Community Services Department
ATTACHMENT:
Appendix `A': Heritage Permit Application HPA- 2013 -IV -009
Draft — 29/April/2013
HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
City of Kitchener
Community Services Department
Planning Division
��kPv 200 King Street West
Kitchener, Ontario N2G 4G7
(519) 741-2426
Nature of Application
Exterior e Interior
Demolition n New Construction
Subject Property
Municipal Address:
Legal Description (if known,)
❑ Alteration
JOSEPH SCHOERG CRES
Relocation
_01
WATERLOO CON BEASLEYS BF PT LOT 11 RP 58816275 PART 2
Building/Structure Type: Residential ❑ Commercial ❑ Industrial ❑ Institutional ❑
Heritage Designation: Part IV le Part V (HCD) n
Is the Subject Property subject to a Heritage Easement or Agreement? Yes F-1 No ❑
Property Owner
Name: City of Kitchener
Address: PO BOX 1118 STN C, Kitchener, Ontario, N2G 4G7
Telephone (Home): Telephone (Work):
Fax: E-Mail:
Agent (if applicable)
Name:
Address:
Telephone (Home):
Fax:
Written Description
Kevin Post (Landscape Architect, City of Kitchener)
131 Goodrich Dr.
Telephone (Work): 519-741-2600 ex 4237
E-Mail: kevin.post@kitchener.ca
Please provide a written description of the project proposal including any conservation methods you
plan to use. Provide such detail as materials to be used, measurements, paint colours, decorative
details, whether any original building fabric is to be removed or replaced, etc. Use additional pages
as required. Please refer to the City of Kitchener Heritage Permit Application Submission Guidelines
for further guidance.
-Please refer to the written descrir)tibn as attached-
Draft — 29/April/2013
Review of City of Kitchener Heritage Permit Application Submission Guidelines
Describe why it is necessary to undertake the proposed work.
-Plpa�p rpfpr to the written dperroption as attarbed-
Describe how the proposal is consistent with the Part IV individual designating by-law or the Part V
Heritage Conservation District Plan.
-Please rpfer to the wrffittpn r1pgrAptinn as attachpd-
Describe how the proposal is consistent with the Parks Canada Standards and Guidelines for the
Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (available at www.pc,gc.ca).
-Plpa�,p rpfpr to the written description as attachpri-
Expected Start Date: 3/July/2013 Expected Completion Date: 30/September/2013 —
(Day/Month/Yearl— (DaylMonth/Y ear
T
Have you discussed this work with Heritage Planning Staff? e4yes, ❑ No
If yes, who? Leoin Bensason —
Have you discussed this work with the Building Division? ❑ Yes No
If yes, who?
Have you applied for a Building Permit for this work? ❑ Yes, M<o
Other Related Applications (Building/Planning): . Application No.
Acknowledgement
The undersigned acknowledges that all of the statements contained in documents filed in support
of this application shall be deemed part of this application. The undersigned acknowledges that
receipt of this application by the City of Kitchener - Planning Division does not guarantee it to be a
"complete` application. The undersigned acknowledges that Council of the City of Kitchener shall
determine whether the information submitted forms a complete application. Further review of the
application will be undertaken and the owner or agent may be contacted to provide additional
information and/or resolve any discrepancies or issues with the application as submitted. Once the
application is deemed to be fully complete, the application will be processed and, if necessary,
scheduled for the next available Heritage Kitchener Committee and Council meeting, Submission
of this application constitutes consent for authorized municipal staff to enter upon the subject
property for the purpose of conducting site visits, including photographs, which are necessary for
the evaluation of this application. The undersigned acknowledges that where an agent has been
identified, the municipality is authorized but not required to contact this person in lieu of the owner
and this person is authorized to act on behalf of the owner for all matters respecting the
application. The undersigned agrees that the proposed work shall be done in accordance with this
application and understands that the approval of this application under the Ontario Heritage Act
Draft — 29/April/2013
shall not be a waiver of any of the provisions of any by-law of the City of Kitchener or legislation,
including but not limited to the requirements of the Building Code and the Zoning By-law. The
undersigned acknowledges that in the event this application is approved, any departure from the
conditions imposed by the Council of the City of Kitchener or from the plans or specifications
approved by the Council of the City of Kitchener is prohibited and could result in a fine being
imposed or imprisonment as provided for under the Ontario Heritage Act.
3
Signature of Owner/Agent: 'oL Date: 1'1171'4
Signature of Owner/Agent:
Authorization
Date:
If this application is being made by an agent/solicitor on behalf of the property owner, the following
authorization must be completed:
I /We,
hereby authorize
owner of the land that is subject of this application,
to act on my I our behalf in this regard.
Signature of Owner: Date:
Signature of Owner:
Date:
The personal information on this form is collected under the legal authority of Section 33(2),
Section 42(2), and Section 42(2.2) of the Ontario Heritage Act, The information will be used for the
purposes of administering the heritage permit application and ensuring appropriate service of
notice of receipt under Section 33(3) and Section 42(3) of the Ontario Heritage Act If you have
any questions about this collection of personal information, please contact the Manager of
Corporate Records, Legislated Services Division, City of Kitchener (519-741-2,769).
Written Description for the
Schoerg Barn Heritage
Permit Application
KjT(,`Hii ,R. May 2013
Written Description:
The first part will be concentrating on the rehabilitating of the existing
farm foundation to stabilize the stone foundation from further
environmental deterioration. The second part will be focusing on
improvements to the surrounding landscape to create the park.
1) The rehabilitation for the existing foundation will include the
following as listed below. All rehabilitating work will be similar to
the rehabilitating work that was completed at the nearby Betzner
Barn in 2010.
• Add a low strength concrete retaining wall below grade along
the north wall to stabilize the heritage barn foundation from
overturning.
• Add subgrade drainage to reduce hydrostatic pressure behind
the existing foundation wall and reduce the amount of water
moving through it.
• Replacing any damaged or missing bricks and stones as
required with matching materials.
• Repointing the existing masonry with a lime based mortar,
based mortar which matches the existing.
• Add cut limestone stone capping on all existing foundation
wall segments. The cap stone will overhang the foundation
wall by 75mm (Y) on both sides, including a drip edge, to
help reduce the amount of water entering into the existing
wall.
• Add galvanized steel window frames into the window opens.
• Adding galvanized steel hand rails along the north wall to
reduce potential fall hazards.
• Removal of and make safe the existing cistern and concrete
masonry unit (cinder block) wall extension, located at the
northeast corner of the barn.
• Remove the existing concrete manger and concrete divider
located within the center of the barn foundation.
• Replace the existing earth /damaged concrete barn floor with
a granular material.
2) Park like improvements to the site will include the following:
• Remove the insulation and make safe the foundation of the
existing spring house located just east of the existing barn
foundation. The spring house foundation will be kept in place
to help to keep the history of the site and the relevant
structures.
figgii re I - exposed gxii idaflixun wall xafth sfillx hi
backgroixind
oggii re g" Ilgxu°un and sfillx u°xumxfiuns" (North th II'; Ilxxxdxun
4 11 % j a 11 11 11 11 %, 1, 4 11 11 � � L 11 %.M % 11 11 11 � 1111 11 � L 11 11 % 1111 11 L%
maingger (cxuntxu°))'to Il be u°xumxxx
• Installation of an accessible concrete and asphalt (HL4)
pathway from the road to the rear of the site. This pathway will
be located on the east side of the barn foundation.
• Site grading to improve surface draining and to ensure the
surrounding surfaces slopes away from the heritage barn
foundation.
• Remove buckthorn vegetation from the south end of the site.
• The large existing trees will be protected during construction.
Review of City of Kitchener Heritage Permit Application
Submission Guidelines
Describe why it is necessary to undertake the proposed work
Majority of the work is required to stabilize the foundation and to
prevent further deterioration due to frost action during the winter.
Some of the work is required to increase the public safety of this City
resource. The work required within Part 2 is required to improve site
safety, and improve site drainage, increase site accessibility so that all
can enjoy the heritage resource and to reduce the amount of non-
native invasive plant species.
Describe how the proposal is consistent with the Part IV
individual designating by -law or the Part V Heritage Conservation
District Plan
Pursuant to Notice of Intention to designate, dated on 2004- 12 -13, we
are preserving the remaining structures on site with minimal
intervention to stabilize and to prevent further deterioration to the
structure. We are maintaining the existing landscape characteristics
as much as possible by protecting the existing trees and removing the
non - native weed tree species.
Describe how the proposal is consistent with the Parks Canada
Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places
in Canada (available at www.pc.gc.ca).
Due to actions that were taken by the previous site owner, this
heritage resource has greatly deteriorated. Majority of the wood
elements were removed and the foundation was left to return to the
earth. We are proposing to rehabilitate the remaining fieldstone barn
foundation and stabilizing it for preservation of the heritage value.
Under the Parks Canada Standards and Guidelines for the
Conservation of Historic Places:
• Consider Rehabilitation as the primary treatment when:
• (a) Repair or replacement of deteriorated features is
necessary;
Repairs and replacement of the deteriorating
fieldstone foundation is required for the preservation
of the heritage value.
• (b) Alterations or additions to the historic place are
planned for a new or continued use;
The site is now part of The City of Kitchener's Park
lands and the new use of the site will reflect the
heritage element within a city park.
l i"iggiuu °x 4 Il:xfisthigg spilingg Ilhxiusx the fhisii llafloin to
be u°xumxxx and the u°xumahis umade sage
I' figgiiure .. a °etafii fiu gg walllll sxiiiUll xg Il xu °u .. ggii ar
°xfill i gg to be added unext to the wall Il iuU the wall
Wllll Il be Ileft as fis.
l figgii re 6 Concrete Masonry gJin (chi der Il llxck)
Addffioin .. to Il be u°xumxxx
figgii re " .. U ll fkalll wood deteilorafling x widow
frai e . to Il be replaced xafth x umetalll frai e
o (c) Depiction during a particular period in its history is
not appropriate.
The Barn and former site use will not be restored to
a particular period in history as it is not appropriate
and cost prohibitive.
General Standards for Preservation, Rehabilitation and
Restoration
1. Conserve the heritage value of an historic place.
The structures on site will not be removed or significantly
altered. These elements will be rehabilitated, made safe and
protected from further deterioration.
2. Conserve changes to historic places that, over time, have
become character - defining elements in their own right.
The existing concrete silo, added at some time after the
original barn foundation, will be conserved in its current state
with the addition of galvanized steel grates in accessible
openings for public safety.
3. Conserve heritage value by adopting an approach calling for
minimal intervention.
We are upholding the principle of minimal intervention to
make safe, stabilize and preserve the site - defining heritage
elements.
4. Recognize each historic place as a physical record of its time,
place and use.
A part from the accessible pathway and new cap- stone,
metal railing and window guards no other elements will be
added especially elements from different historical places or
periods.
5. Find a use for an historic place that requires minimal or no
change to its character - defining elements.
As a park land, the character - defining heritage elements will
remain as a shell of its former self, allowing for the historical
connection to the past. Interpretive sign boards to be
provided to help with interpretation of the historical elements.
I iggii re 8 t ll fkalll wall 'types that u°xqufiu °x a relpah,
1131ld( (froi nt uIgglht) and giixll stxunx (heft)
I ggii re 9 xsounu °gr xu °III ant Ilg tziiieu Ilgxu °un.. nrhx Il u°fd(s
(heft) are the orggfhnxll, the ones over the Iheader are
new. �'llhe Mze, textii re and colloii , u"%nxnrch. Soilnx of the
stone Work (ii1ll ll eu° Ilxgnr under the calls stoi nx) fis Il xnrlh
I figgiuu °x g .. Concrete cluirlb of n the uµnxu ~nrlh gxiixoidafloi n
wall to be u°xu"%°noxx
l figgiuu °x 11 .. Sxhoxu°gg Ilgxu°uµn froiµnn �xsxll lh Sxhoxu°gg Cres
l figgii re 12 14 xfsthngg dsteri n to be reinloved and
made sage ",
6. Protect and, if necessary, stabilize an historic place until any
subsequent intervention is undertaken.
No applicable - intervention work will be completed this year,
2013.
7. Evaluate the existing condition of character - defining elements to
determine the appropriate intervention needed. Use the gentlest
means possible for any intervention. Respect heritage value
when undertaking an intervention.
Through consultation with engineers and heritage restoration
experts, the interventions being employed are the least
destructive and are minimal required to make safe, stabilize
and preserve the site - defining heritage elements.
8. Maintain character - defining elements on an ongoing basis.
The City of Kitchener staff will be maintaining the structure
once the rehabilitation work is completed. Any deteriorating
areas will be repaired or replaced in kind. Re- pointing of
masonry elements will be completed by contractors skilled in
this work on an average of every 15 to 20 years as required.
9. Make any intervention needed to preserve character - defining
elements physically and visually compatible with the historic place
and identifiable on close inspection.
The cap stone intervention is required to prevent water from
entering the foundation. The limestone cap stone will be
similar in colour to the existing fieldstones, but saw cut and
squared to allow for distinguishing between the intervention
and historical element. All work that is carried out will be
documented within the construction drawings and archived.
The cap stone details will be the similar to the capstone used
for the rehabilitation at Betzner Barn.
Additional Standards Relating to Rehabilitation
10. Repair rather than replace character - defining elements.
Any repair and replacement work required to the fieldstone
barn foundation will be using reclaimed and /or new materials
that visually match the existing, along with lime based mortar
which matches the existing.
11. Conserve the heritage value and character - defining elements
when creating any new additions to an historic place or any
related new construction.
There will be no large additions to the historic place. The new
items that will be placed onto the barn foundation include the
cap stone, guard railing and window frames. These items
have been detailed to be subordinate and distinguishable
from the historic fieldstone barn foundation. The cap stone,
guard railing and window frames details will be the similar to
the ones used for the rehabilitation at Betzner Barn.
l i"iggii r 1 - hiterlpipetafloin Mgguns at 113etzineip Il:g u°u
hfgg1hHgg1l flingg the illlp edge (IIg U°zuneu Il:g u°un)
l figgii r 15 - II allfiungg and Calpstoine at 113etziner Il:g u°un
U)
J
O y
� J
� � W
r Z
lu O 0 Z�
J
Z Z Q7
0 QJza
c�zaZa
C') oa�oao
z a
N W W W J Z
a
Wfn (7W�iN
o J�c�woo
Z z
W a
W
Z � o
�W J z
� W J LO V
CL r_
o
a o W w
0 a o �� � M
.0 .�
L �
Cl) o Q �o
0 � DC
CL
L Q
�Q Q a;
LIL
L
LZ
W
0 o U) LLI
CL z
V = cn LU Y
V w
c
a
4 �
O CD ✓ Z
W
U F
Us,
5i
,9t
HE \ } \( }� }:
�(� \�}
/} /
\
}
}
�
LU
-a
\ \ \
\
°
)
}
}�
��
e
06
m
�� � \\
�
(
~
w
LU
0
z
�\
\�
/\ � |{
\};
�
2
�
�
6)
\,�
�
�
!
Us,
5i
,9t
HE \ } \( }� }:
�(� \�}
/} /
\
}
}
�
Us,
5i
,9t
HE \ } \( }� }:
�(� \�}
°
e � 3
N
go G� q ogo U
a � w
"yam 1 E
oa �M1°
m° � w°
,
o�
lip
w z ��
ado =
\
11 a
\ \l Im'� "11 \ mll1\1 \I�
I li \\ 1j 1iBae\
L71�- - ±-\11
IIS�11 //I-
11�
r
f'
\ � I
I
c7s dv\ \g
whom Rol <�
_
\ \ \ \
G�
moo°
d\ n1 °w
in
¢g
z�z�
\
o� amC
\ \ \1\ �I
111 in
lGo
1
\ ins to M M1
41
\
{
° \ \ \ \ \
�a \
zw
\ _
\ v 1
\#
an
\ @1111
W
I\ \ \ \
=p gig!
o°= -o=
o
W
r
=i
=gig
°
e � 3
N
go G� q ogo U
a � w
"yam 1 E
oa �M1°
m° � w°
,
o�
lip
w z ��
ado =
\
11 a
\ \l Im'� "11 \ mll1\1 \I�
I li \\ 1j 1iBae\
L71�- - ±-\11
IIS�11 //I-
11�
r
f'
\ � I
I
c7s dv\ \g
Nil "Ogg -
�
whom Rol <�
_
\ \ \ \
G�
moo°
d\ n1 °w
in
¢g
z�z�
\
o� amC
\ \ \1\ �I
111 in
lGo
1
\ ins to M M1
41
\
{
° \ \ \ \ \
�a \
zw
\ _
\ v 1
\#
\ @1111
W
I\ \ \ \
=p gig!
o°= -o=
o
W
r
=i
=gig
still
l
ew
m
QRS,¢
"mr
Nil "Ogg -
�
r
—
��° -
/ ��� \ V A i� I I ,L. �'��d —•—/K � I o��a I A 1 i I � �Im°� A �°
—
° -
i\
� I Yams Q�� \ \ �� a \ \\ . \\ 1\ ii✓ \ �4 �\ \ono \ \
z
s�A\
Jb�ZO \ N
o A
`v
o �
LZ
LLI
W
w
�
r
—
��° -
/ ��� \ V A i� I I ,L. �'��d —•—/K � I o��a I A 1 i I � �Im°� A �°
—
° -
i\
� I Yams Q�� \ \ �� a \ \\ . \\ 1\ ii✓ \ �4 �\ \ono \ \
z
s�A\
Jb�ZO \ N
o A
`v
o �
LZ
4,-
A2
z
II 3
,
LU
z
CC
6i
i5
LU
E:l
1
2
L)
H. lb
U)
II 3
H. lb
o°
' I I.
I I
a3
0�
Lo
oW
19
I
'Es
02
ir
W
lip
Fr-
ag
19
0
z
LLJ
❑ El [T] ❑
❑ El M
ph
ZI
-1
z
0
Ot 5-
z
Cl)
0
z
W
IrLLI
7i
-IF
6 9
A Lu
4
IN
z
2s
2.
2
LU
<
2
sh
-.E
Po
g�
N'-M 0 Ls
2
Ot 5-
z
W
-IF
6 9
A Lu
IN
2G
w0,
2
sh
-.E
Po
g�
N'-M 0 Ls
2
�NN
V-4A,
11 gill
d
it
oz
Z
L IIIFEL
III 11111115
AIII-
M
MEN
o
bud
Emflk
EM,
Y
o gg
¢ R
z
1H m
�w�w
g
-ul
M
-z
- 1 1111,111,111 Hill M
111-
11
z
LLj
it
2t
LU
0
as
co
LU
o
WN
------- - - --
pg
FL
0 t!
X X,
zw
oozy
rr
Iz
>
/\MM\/
M
Z:z
T T
--s
g
Z LW