HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-05-07 HERITAGE KITCHENER MINUTES
MAY 07, 2013 CITY OF KITCHENER
The Heritage Kitchener Committee met this date, commencing at 4:05 p.m.
Present: Mr. G. Zeilstra-Chair
Councillor F. Etherington, Ms. E. Rudland, Ms. B. Glenn-Graham, Ms. A. Hooykaas,
Messrs.J. Stevens and S. Burrows.
Staff: L. Bensason, Coordinator of Cultural Heritage Planning
C. Goodeve, Supervisor, Legislated Services
C. Mahood, Heritage Planner
M. Lee, Heritage Planner
W. Sleeth, Landscape Architect
D. Livingstone, Committee Administrator
1. PRESENTATION - CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
- VICTORIA PARK WASHROOMS
The Committee considered the Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment for the proposed
washroom building at Victoria Park, prepared by The Landplan Collaborative Ltd., dated April
24, 2013.
Mr. L. Bensason provided background for the project stating that the Heritage Impact
Assessment (HIA) is being presented as a requirement for the Heritage Permit Application to
construct a new washroom building in Victoria Park. He referred to the February 5, 2013
Heritage Kitchener meeting which was attended by Mr. W. Sleeth, who presented four options
for the washroom facilities in Victoria Park. The four options that were considered were: year
round utilization of the existing facilities located near the pavilion; adaptively reuse and retrofit
the building on Joseph Street; construct a new building at the end of the existing parking lot on
Jubilee Drive; or, reuse the existing utility building on Water Street. At the March 4, 2013
Council meeting, construction of a new building at the far side of the parking lot on Jubilee
Drive was approved. He indicated that as Victoria Park is located in the Victoria Park Heritage
Conservation District, and to have consideration for policies from the Region of Waterloo
related to Cultural Heritage Landscapes, it was requested that an HIA be prepared. He stated
that the HIA is being presented for information at this time, in anticipation of the HPA being
brought forward to Heritage Kitchener in June for consideration.
Mr. Owen Scott, LandPlan Collaborative gave a presentation reviewing the HIA and the
Victoria Park Conservation District Plan. He advised that the HIA examines mitigating
measures to ensure the washroom assimilates with the heritage attributes of the Park and the
District. He reviewed the Victoria Park Conservation District Plan,which refers to Victoria Park
as one of the nation's finest examples of romantic landscape style. He advised that all
attributes are to be taken into account when considering the location of the new building in
order to preserve the attributes of the cultural heritage landscape. The Plan states that all
permanent structures within the wooded areas should be discouraged for preservation, he
noted that the wooded area at the washroom location should be enhanced in accordance with
the Plan. Mr. Scott reviewed applicable conservation policies within the Plan stating a number
of criteria are required for a new building including vistas, lighting furnishings, and signage.
Mr. Scott referred to the impacts of the new building stating that there are a number of trees in
the wooded area in the vicinity of the approved location including Austrian Pines, Globe
Maples, and grand Sugar Maples, all of which will be preserved if in good health. He noted
that the objective within the Plan is to encourage a canopy of trees and hearty planting to
mitigate the sighting of a building in order to nestle it into the wooded area. He reviewed the
characteristics of the proposed building perspective: 1300 sq. ft in size; single storey with a
gable roof; located at the northerly edge of the existing parking lot and will have the least
impact to the Park as possible. The size, sighting, massing and detailing are all design
aspects used to have a minimal impact. With regard to outside elevations, he indicated that
the lighting would be minimal with the longer lower roofline softening the impact; poured
concrete lentils with benches will be built-in; cedar shingles have been suggested; glass will be
tempered and frosted to convey a traditional image, all of which are consistent with the Victoria
Park Heritage Conservation District Plan. Mr. Scott opened the floor to comments and
questions from the Committee.
Ms. A. Hooykaas expressed concerns related to safety and inquired about lighting on the
pathway and building. Mr. Scott responded that the building exterior is lit but additional lighting
HERITAGE KITCHENER MINUTES
MAY 07. 2013 -14- CITY OF KITCHENER
1. PRESENTATION - CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT
- VICTORIA PARK WASHROOMS (CONT'D)
can be considered. Mr. S. Burrows agreed with Ms. Hooykaas, suggesting additional lighting
for safety and expressed concern that an area behind the building will create an alcove with
trees. Mr. W. Sleeth responded that there is an existing light pole which may be relocated
along the pathway to the building to address safety concerns. In addition, Mr. Scott noted that
there are four lights to be located around the exterior of the building.
Councillor F. Etherington shared the concern for the alcove created behind the building. He
noted that there is an existing berm that currently creates issues for the police which would be
further exacerbated by trees.
Mr. Burrows commented that the design of the structure does not seem representative of its
site within Victoria Park and that it is being hidden. Mr. Scott responded that the building is
being situated in accordance with the Victoria Park Heritage Conservation District Plan which
suggests no building in the wooded area. He reiterated that the proposal mitigates the Plan's
policies by nestling the building into the wooded area.
With regard to the building materials, Councillor F. Etherington commented that cedar shingles
are being proposed, and inquired if they are used consistently throughout the structures within
the Park. Mr. Sleeth responded that the garage has cedar shingles but the boathouse does
not. Mr. M. Peterson provided comments, in absentia, suggesting the use of alternative
materials, such as simulated asphalt shingles or recycled rubber shingles that appear to be
cedar shake and offer a partnership between heritage value and environmental sensitivity.
Councillor Etherington further commented that the Victoria Park Working Group has suggested
a skate changing area at the new building. Mr. Scott acknowledged this suggestion has been
incorporated in to the design, noting that the exterior benches will serve as an outdoor skate
changing area.
2. CSD-13-042 - LISTING OF NON-DESIGNATED PROPERTIES OF CULTURAL
HERITAGE VALUE OR INTEREST ON THE MUNICIPAL HERITAGE
REGISTER
The Committee considered Community Services Department report CSD-13-042, dated April
25, 2013 recommending listing the properties municipally addressed as 79 Moore Avenue/54-
68 Shanley Street, and 241-247 Duke Street West/55 Victoria Street North as non-designated
properties of cultural heritage value or interest on the Municipal Heritage Register.
Ms. M. Lee reviewed the report, advising that the two properties are municipally addressed as
79 Moore Avenue/54-68 Shanley Street and 241 Duke Street West/55 Victoria Street North.
The first property is known as Sacred Heart Catholic Church and consists of a church, rectory,
former convent and two older homes, all owned by the Catholic Church. She reviewed the
Statement of Significance for 79 Moore Avenue/54-68 Shanley Street which was prepared to
detail the heritage attributes of the property, including the design, historical and contextual
features and is attached to Report CSD-13-042 as Appendix A'.
Ms. Lee provided an overview of the second property recommended for listing on the
Municipal Heritage Register, advising that it is known as the Bergen Electric Company, circa
1800s, and is currently tenanted by the "Love Shop". She stated that it is located on the
southwest corner of Duke Street West and Victoria Street North in the downtown Kitchener.
She advised that an addition to the original structure was constructed, by the overall mass and
setbacks remain the same. She reviewed the design, historical, and contextual features of the
building, as detailed in the Statement of Significance for 241 Duke Street West/55 Victoria
Street North which is attached to Report CSD-13-042 as Appendix A'.
HERITAGE KITCHENER MINUTES
MAY 07. 2013 -15- CITY OF KITCHENER
2. CSD-13-042 - LISTING OF NON-DESIGNATED PROPERTIES OF CULTURAL
HERITAGE VALUE OR INTEREST ON THE MUNICIPAL HERITAGE
REGISTER(CONT'D)
On motion by Mr.J. Stevens-
it was resolved:
"That pursuant to Section 27 of the Ontario Heritage Act, the following properties be
listed on the Municipal Heritage Register as non-designated properties of cultural
heritage value or interest, in accordance with the Statements of Significance attached
as Appendix'A'to Community Services Department report CSD-13-042:
■ 79 Moore Avenue/54-68 Shanley Street;
■ 241-247 Duke Street West/55 Victoria Street North."
3. ASSIGNMENT OF FIELD/ EVALUATION SUBCOMMITTEE AND DISTRIBUTION OF FIELD
PACKAGES
The Committee Field Teams were in receipt this date of material for use in the evaluation of
properties which are of cultural heritage interest.
Mr. L. Bensason referred to the March 5, 2013 Heritage Kitchener meeting when members
were asked to submit their interest in participating on either a Field Team or the Evaluation
Subcommittee. He advised that according to the responses received, the following Field
Teams have been assembled:
Field Team 1 —Mr. Stephen Thomson & Ms.Amanda Hooykaas;
Field Team 2—Mr. Grayson Zeilstra & Mr. John Stephens; and,
Field Team 3—Ms.Ann Oja & Mr. Tyler Batten.
Mr. Bensason indicated that training on the architectural styles will take place at the June 4,
2013 Heritage Kitchener meeting, and will be useful for the Committee in applying the criteria
for evaluation by the Field Teams and Subcommittee. He advised that the Evaluation
Subcommittee will be comprised of Ms. Beverly Glenn-Graham, Ms. Erin Rudland, and Mr.
Stephen Thompson. He noted that the role of the Evaluation Subcommittee will be to review
the forms and photographs submitted by the Field Teams, in collaboration with Heritage
Planning Staff; and, to apply criteria to determine if the property should be shortlisted and
brought forward for consideration of listing as a non-designated property of cultural heritage
value on the Municipal Heritage Register.
In response to questions, Mr. Bensason indicated that evaluation of properties within the
packages can be completed over the summer months with submission to Heritage Planning
Staff in August 2013.
4. ROCKWAY GARDENS UPDATE
Mr. L. Bensason gave a presentation updating the status of designating Rockway Gardens
under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. He referred to the Heritage Impact Assessment
(HIA) completed by MHBC Planning and considered by Heritage Kitchener meeting in October
2012, which concluded that the Rockway Gardens and Rockway Centre are of cultural
heritage value and interest. He stated that the HIA identified defining attributes associated
with cultural heritage values; such as, the landscape; open space; fountains; pools; and
rockery. He stated that in consideration of the defining attributes and the impact designation
may have, Heritage Planning Staff met with the Kitchener Horticultural Society. He explained
that the Horticultural Society has worked in partnership with the City to manage and operate
Rockway Gardens for the past 80 years. He indicated that their work has allowed the Gardens
to evolve over time, by moving and installing both old and new structures. He stated that the
Kitchener Horticultural Society has indicated that the rockery is the most significant feature
within the Gardens, and recognizes that it is not going to be moved. He elaborated that when
the Kitchener Horticultural Society became aware of the recommendation to designate the
Gardens, they expressed concern the ability to conduct their work would be impacted by the
requirement of an approved Heritage Permit Application. In response to these concerns, Staff
advised that the recommendation to designate was to promote the significance of the Gardens.
He suggested that rather than specify each structure in the Designating By-law, the
HERITAGE KITCHENER MINUTES
MAY 07. 2013 -16- CITY OF KITCHENER
4. ROCKWAY GARDENS UPDATE (CONT'D)
descriptions could be limited to broad characteristics that would allow the Horticultural Society
to continue to make alterations without triggering the Heritage Permit Application process. He
advised that consideration of the Rockway Gardens and Rockway Centre will be at the May
27, 2013 Community& Infrastructure Services Committee meeting.
Ms. A. Hooykaas indicated that although she is supportive of the concerns expressed by the
Horticultural Society, the history of the rockery should be detailed in the Designating By-law to
ensure it is not at risk through alteration. Mr. Bensason assured her that the Statement of
Significance references detailed features within the rockery, and is attached to the Designating
By-law.
5. ADJOURNMENT
On motion, this meeting adjourned at 5:10 p.m.
Daphne Livingstone
Committee Administrator