Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCSD-13-090 - Kitchener Growth Management Plan (KGMP) 2013 - 2015 REPORT TO: Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee DATE OF MEETING: September 30, 2013 SUBMITTED BY: Alain Pinard, Director of Planning PREPARED BY: Garett Stevenson, Senior Planner (519-741-2200 ext. 7070) Brandon Sloan, Manager of Long Range & Policy Planning WARD(S) INVOLVED: All Wards DATE OF REPORT: September 24, 2013 REPORT NO.: CSD-13-090 SUBJECT: Kitchener Growth Management Plan Fall 2013 -Fall 2015+ RECOMMENDATION: That the Kitchener Growth Management Plan Fall 2013 - Fall 2015+, attached to report CSD 13-090, be approved. BACKGROUND: In January 2009, Council approved the Kitchener Growth Management Strategy. A key action item from the strategy was to evolve the 40-year practice of the Staging of Development into a comprehensive plan to manage growth-related projects, infrastructure, land use planning and development applications. In May of 2009, Council approved the first Growth Management Plan (KGMP) followed in the fall of 2011 by the 2011-2013+ KGMP. It is now time to update the biannual KGMP. The KGMP is also a vital tool used by internal City divisions and external agencies in preparing their respective work programs. REPORT: An internal staff team from Planning, Development Engineering, Transportation Planning, Finance, Community Programs & Services and Information Technology provides input into the biannual Kitchener Growth Management Plan (KGMP). The KGMP guides decisions on the relative priority and timing of development applications, environmental assessments, and a broad range of growth-related capital projects, especially infrastructure and community facilities. The KGMP is considered in early Fall (September or October) in order to inform the sequence of growth related infrastructure in the Capital Budget process for the following year. The KGMP also informs the Development Charges process. The plan is used by City divisions, the Region, the GRCA, school boards and other agencies to prioritize their work loads. KGMP 2013-2015+ Process The internal team conducted a preliminary analysis of parcels and project timing based on the Staging of Development criteria outlined in the KGMP (outlined on page 2 of the KGMP document). A draft growth management plan was circulated to departments, agencies, 1 - 1 landowners and their representatives in early July.The item was discussed at the August meetings of both the Waterloo Region Homebuilders Association Liaison Committee as well as the Region of Waterloo Re-urbanization Working Group. The team then synthesized the comments received to formulate the responses provided in this report to create the final KGMP document. This year, the preparation of the KGMP coincides with the Annual Monitoring Report (CSD-13- 076 September 9, 2013). The 2014 Development Charges Background Study is currently infrastructure projects shown in the KGMP. The 2015-2017+ KGMP will further reflect the outcome of the DCstudy. KGMP 2013-2015+ Highlights Since the KGMP 2011, several plans of subdivisions received approval (either through Council or the OMB) in several growth areas. In 2011 and 2012, a total of 4343 units were draft approved. Additionally, numerous subdivision modifications were completed and engineering plans reviewed. Many subdivisions, or stages thereof, were also registered. A number of master plans, engineering environmental assessments, construction projects and other planning projects were undertaken including 9 of the 12 Priority A or B projects from the KGMP 2011 are completed or nearing completion. The outlook for the recommended 2013-2015+ Growth Management Plan program includes prioritization of a number of plans of subdivision and growth related initiatives. Important resources towards completing initiatives that are required to move lands from the draft approval stage to registration, construction and developing complete communities. There are related projects/initiatives that are recommended for prioritization in the immediate timeframe for City staff to undertake or that are known projects in growth areas that involve outside agencies (such as the Region of Waterloo). These initiatives include proceeding with environmental assessments and detailed design for roads, servicing, pumping station upgrades, new road construction, secondary planning and zoning implementation, park/trail implementation, and intensification area work. The following is a summary of the recommended prioritization of land parcels: Priority APriority BPriority CPriority D 16 + 29 + more than 20 4 Intensification 416 Intensification AreasAreas The recommended Priority A & B lands consist of: 17 draft approved plans, 11 plans in circulation and 17 future plans (pending). One Priority C parcel is draft approved and two are future plans - both require future works/applications. Although lands indicated as Priority D may be the lowest priority for development applications, there are often initiatives recommended to be undertaken and completed within each of these areas, such as an area wide transportation study. These initiatives should be completed before the detailed requirements of a subdivision are approved. 1 - 2 As discussed during the consideration of the 2011-2013+ KGMP, there are four main greenfield areas that require infrastructure before development can proceed. This is still the case in the current KGMP, however two areas are starting to move forward in the process. Response to Preliminary Circulation There were 15 responses received on the preliminary circulation regarding 24 parcels. The Grand River Conservation Authority did not identify any concerns. The remainder of the responses were on behalf of various landowners and their representatives. The comments and justification received for the individual parcels are attached as . The following is a summary of the requests and a brief staff response. 730 New Dundee Road The request is to add this parcel as a Priority D to the KGMP. Due to the size of the property, redevelopment of this property does not need to be reflected in the City-wide Staff KGMP and will likely be considered through the Site Plan approval process. recommend not identifying this parcel in the KGMP . Tract Biehns Pt Lots 2 And 3 RP 58R-8062 Pt Part 1 CL (near the commencement of Doon Mills Drive Previous Parcel #39) & 669 Charles Street East The request is to add this parcel as a Priority B to the KGMP. This property is within the Built Boundary Line (Built Up Area) and is a Site Specific Intensification Opportunity, which provides Priority A timing. As this parcel is already indirectly identified in the staff recommend not specifically identifying this property KGMP,. 388 Old Huron Road, 1650 Fisher Hallman Road (former Parcel 131), 1989/2009 Ottawa Street (former Parcel 128) The request is to leave these parcels in the KGMP and identify as Priority A. These three parcels are proceeding to construction. As a result, there parcels have been appropriately removed from the KGMP. As these are active development applications, Staff will continue to undertake necessary reviews as these applications progress Staff recommend not identifying these parcels in the KGMP. towards final approval. Parcel #13 (30T-07201 Laurentian West Phase 1-3A) staff recommended Priority A timing The proponent supports the . Parcel #33 (Hallman Construction Limited Brigadoon) staff recommended Priority B timing The proponent supports the . Parcel #130 (Hallman Construction Limited Brigadoon) staff recommended Priority B timing The proponent supports the . Parcel #34 and #35 (Sunvest Reid Ltd Brigadoon) The request is to identify both parcels as Priority B. The City has not formally reviewed any pre-application development proposals for Parcel #35. The future alignment of Robert Ferrie Drive through these parcels in unknown and will be determined through an 1 - 3 Environment Assessment, a related Official Plan Amendment process, and will include a community scaled transportation plan update. This is a new project that has not been identified previously. Further, the development of these parcels requires the completion of an Environmental Assessment for the extension of the Biehn Drive sanitary sewer. Staff recommend Priority C These macro-level studies should be completed first. timing for Parcel #35 (from Priority D), Priority B timing for the Robert Ferrie Drive Extension EA, and recommend maintaining Priority C timing for Parcel #34. It is expected that in the next KGMP, these parcels could potentially rank higher once the required studies are completed. Parcel #37 (Chalon Estates Doon South Phase 1) staff recommended Priority B timing The proponent supports the . Parcel #46 (Ormston Doon South Phase 2) The request is to identify the south portion of this parcel as Priority B rather than Priority D.The north portion of this parcel has Priority B timing. Given previous commitments in Staff recommend Priority B timing Doon South, as requested for the whole parcel for the reasons outlined in the Propon Parcel #58 (Pearl Valley Development Corporation - Hidden Valley) The request is to change the timing of the Hidden Valley Land Use Plan Update to 2013- 2014 and to plan the Hidden Valley Sanitary Servicing EA and related facilities concurrently with the construction of the River Road extension. The Region of Waterloo is anticipating the completion of the River Road Extension EA in 2014. The Hidden Valley Land Use Plan Update is scheduled for 2015+.The Hidden Valley Sanitary at a later date,pending the outcome of the 2014 Development Charges Background Staff recommend maintaining Priority D timing for Parcel #58. Staff also Study. recommend maintaining the timing shown on the KGMP for required infrastructure and land use planning processes. Pending the completion of the River Road EA process and the 2014 Development Charges Background Study, timing could be revisited. Parcel #90 (Activa Doon South Phase 2) The request is to identify Parcels #33, #34, and #35 as Priority B, to coordinate the timing of the Blair Creek Bridge with the Doon South Sanitary Sewage Facility in 2015, and to identify the Robert Ferrie Drive extension as Priority A/B. Parcel #90 is identified as Priority B.Staff will continue to work with the proponent and the owner to review the merits of a Development Charge Credit Refund Agreement for required infrastructure Staff recommend Priority B timing for Parcel #90, Priority B and maintenance. timing for the Robert Ferrie Drive Extension EA, andPriority B timing for Parcel #33. Further, staff recommend Priority C timing for Parcels #34 and #35 for reasons noted under the associated response. Parcels #97 and 101 (Monarch Doon South Phase 2) The request is to identify both parcels as Priority Abmission identifies ongoing discussions between City staff and the owner regarding a Development Charge Credit Refund Agreement for required infrastructure and 1 - 4 maintenance. The design and construction of the first phase of the Doon South Pumping Station (DSPS) (pump station and interim force main) in accordance with the approved EA is expected to take 18 months to complete, however the commencement Staff recommend maintaining Priority B timing for date has not been determined. Parcels #97 and #101 and will continue discussions with the proponent regarding the Development Charge Credit Refund Agreement and related timing. Parcel #117 (Activa Laurentian West Phase 3b) staff recommended Priority B timing The proponent supports the . Parcel #120 (South Estates (Kitchener) Limited Partnership - Rosenberg) & Parcel #121 (Big Springs Farms Limited Rosenberg) The request is to have further discussions regarding the timing of related infrastructure. Staff will continue to discuss the timing of infrastructure in part with the 2014 staff recommend the timing for applicable Development Charges Study. At this time, infrastructure as shown on the KGMP. Parcel #125 (N2K Storage Rosenberg) & Parcel #126 (Activa Rosenberg) The request is to identify this parcel as Priority A. While this property (and others along Fischer Hallman in the Rosenberg Community) is intended for a mixed use area, there are still a number of planning applications to consider along with engineering and recommend maintaining Priority B timing community infrastructure. Staff . The request is to identify this parcel as Priority A. While this property (and others along Fischer Hallman in the Rosenberg Community) is intended for a mixed use area, there are still a number of planning applications to consider along with engineering and recommend maintaining Priority B timing community infrastructure. Staff . Parcel #132 (Stamm Investments Rosenberg) The request is to identify this parcel as Priority B. Sanitary servicing to this this property will be provided by the Middle Strasburg Sanitary Trunk Sewer which is planned for construction in 2017-2019 and must first proceed through lands to the east that have not yet received draft approval. A pre-application meeting was held with the City and a plan of subdivision application is expected in future as extraction operations are ceasing. Staff recommend Priority C timing as this time as there are some interrelated relationships of this parcel with other parcels in Rosenberg. City staff and some proponents are currently engaged in discussions proposing Development Charge Credit Refund Agreements for required infrastructure and maintenance. No agreements have been finalized and no decisions have been made. ALIGNMENT WITH CITY OF KITCHENER STRATEGIC PLAN: Directions #1 and 3. 1 - 5 FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Decisions on the KGMP are intended to inform the growth-related Capital Budget Forecast. The KGMP provides the city- may impact the timing and/or financial implications of infrastructure and non-infrastructure projects (although there are numerous other factors and influences). Additionally, the 2014 Development Charges Background Study is currently underway and may development as shown on the KGMP. The 2015-2017+ KGMP will reflect the outcome of the study. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: A draft growth management plan was circulated to departments, agencies, landowners and their representatives in early July. The item was discussed at the August meetings of both the Waterloo Region Homebuilders Association Liaison Committee as well as the Region of Waterloo Re-urbanization Working Group. CONCLUSION: The KGMP provides a comprehensive plan that identifies the relative priority for development application and projects within growth areas. The plan directly implem Management Strategy and Strategic Plan. REVIEWED BY: Della Ross, Manager of Development Review Binu Korah, Manager of Development Engineering Ken Carmichael, Manager of Transportation Planning Mark Hildebrand, Director of Community Programs & Services Ruth Anne Goetz, Senior Financial Analyst ACKNOWLEDGED BY: Michael May, Deputy CAO Community Services Department ATTACHMENTS: Appendix A - Preliminary Circulation Comments Received Appendix B - Kitchener Growth Management Plan Fall 2013- Fall 2015+ (available online) http://www.kitchener.ca/en/businessinkitchener/Current_applications_and_studies.asp 1 - 6 BQQFOEJY;B 1 - 7 1 - 8 1 - 9 1 - 10 1 - 11 1 - 12 1 - 13 1 - 14 1 - 15 1 - 16 1 - 17 1 - 18 1 - 19 1 - 20 1 - 21 1 - 22 1 - 23 1 - 24 BQQFOEJY;C 1 - 25 1 - 26 1 - 27 1 - 28 1 - 29 HighestLowest 1 - 30 1 - 31 1 - 32 1 - 33 1 - 34 1 - 35 1 - 36 1 - 37 1 - 38 1 - 39 1 - 40 1 - 41 1 - 42 1 - 43 1 - 44 1 - 45 1 - 46 1 - 47 1 - 48 1 - 49 1 - 50 1 - 51 1 - 52 1 - 53 1 - 54 1 - 55 1 - 56 1 - 57 1 - 58 1 - 59 1 - 60 1 - 61 1 - 62 1 - 63 1 - 64 1 - 65 1 - 66 1 - 67 1 - 68 1 - 69 1 - 70