HomeMy WebLinkAboutINS-13-100 - Corporate Asset Management Program UpdateStaff Rep►�►r
I r Infrastruc�ture5ervrresDepartment wvwuukitchenerra
REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of Council
DATE OF MEETING: October 28, 2013
SUBMITTED BY: Hans N. Gross, P. Eng., Director of Asset Management
PREPARED BY: Hans N. Gross, P. Eng., Director of Asset Management
WARD(S) INVOLVED: All
DATE OF REPORT: October 23, 2013
REPORT NO.: INS — 13 - 100
SUBJECT: Corporate Asset Management Program Update
RECOMMENDATION:
For Information.
BACKGROUND:
The City of Kitchener has established a corporate asset management program to manage the
City's assets, incorporating all aspects of asset maintenance and service delivery. Asset
management represents a core business function for the city given the considerable number
and value of its assets — over $3 Billion in replacement value.
In January 2012, Council was provided with an update of the program and on January 16, 2012
Council adopted the Corporate Asset Management Program Policy and Framework ( Report
INS -11 -082).
The program incorporates a strategy for addressing and prioritizing asset rehabilitation and
replacement needs in a consistent and transparent format. The objective of the strategy is to
use risk management concepts to provide an optimal balance between the needs and costs for
repairing, replacing and upgrading assets with the affordability to do so. More specifically, the
strategy delivers the following benefits:
• Council awareness and involvement in addressing infrastructure deficit
• The development of long range asset management plans
• Improved evidence - informed decision - making
• Long -term financial requirements to sustain the assets
• Improved corporate financial stability and sustainability
• Improved capital planning processes
• Consistent asset management practices and measures across the organization
• Positioning the City to be eligible for the receipt of upper government -level infrastructure
funding programs
This report provides an update of activities and results from January 2012 to October 2013.
REPORT:
The asset management update presentation, a hard copy of which is attached to this report,
includes:
• A brief description of the purpose and services provided by the Asset Management
Division
• A summary of the City's asset management history from 2006 to October 2013
• A synopsis of the City's position among Ontario municipalities related to asset
management practices
• Results of detailed asset management plans for: Pavement, the Sanitary Utility, the
Water Utility, the Stormwater Utility and the Auditorium and Arenas.
• The roadmap for next steps
This presentation provides high -level results for the five detailed asset management plans
including information on: asset inventory, general asset condition, confidence level of the
results, deficit levels and long -term funding scenarios including the establishment of reserves for
the sustainability of the assets. Each of the five detailed asset management plan reports
consists of 40 — 60 pages.
Council is asked to consider the following questions as it relates to the presentation:
• Is the information being presented clear and helpful?
• Are the funding scenarios together with the establishment of reserves reasonable and
acceptable?
• Is there any other high -level information that you would like to receive in future updates?
ALIGNMENT WITH CITY OF KITCHENER STRATEGIC PLAN:
The Asset Management Program resides within the City's Strategic Plan as part of Section 2 —
Effective and Efficient Government Priorities, namely Priority E2.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
None.
CONCLUSION:
A solid Corporate Asset Management Program will ensure the availability and sustainability of
existing and future assets for the City of Kitchener.
ACKNOWLEDGED BY: Pauline Houston, DCAO
Infrastructure Services Department
1.b. -2
0
City of Kitchener
Corporate Asset Management
Program Update
October 28, 2013
1.b. -3
• AM Division — Who are we and what we do?
• AM History — One Step At A Time
• How Does Kitchener Measure Up?
• Funding Source for Kitchener's 12 Asset Groups
• Asset Management Plan (AMP) Results:
— Level of Confidence
— Pavement
— Sanitary Utility
— Water Utility
— Stormwater Utility
• Facilities Management Overview and AUD and Arenas Results:
— Overview
• Roadmap for Next Steps
1.b. -4
Asset Management Division
Purpose —to develop a Corporate Asset Management program that will
ensure the availability and sustainability of Kitchener's existing and future
assets.
• June 2010 to May 2013 —1 Director (Hans Gross)
• May 2013 to Current — addition of Engineering's Asset Planning Group (6 Staff)
Services
• Corporate activities
(E.g. data integration, asset reporting, asset plan development)
• Asset specific activities
(E.g. data management plans, levels of service, lifecycle costing)
1.b. -5
AM History —One Step At A Time
2006-2008 PSAB 3150 Implementation
2007 High Level Asset Management Assessment
2007-2009 Financial (SAP) & Work Order System (CityWorks) Implementation
2009 Asset Management Service Delivery Strategy
2011 Kitchener's Infrastructure Gap Analysis Report
2012 Kitchener's Adoption AM Policy
2012-2013 Detailed AMPs; Pavement and the AUD and Arenas
2013 Detailed AMPs for San, Water, Storm in compliance with provincial
requirements
1.b. -6
How Does Kitchener Measure Up?
1. Gap Analysis Results (2011) for Kitchener's Best Practices for 12
asset groups.
— Ranges from very good to very poor
2. Industry Trend
— 2012 Telephone Survey of 18 Ontario mid to large size cities
puts us in the top 10 — 20%
3. July 2013 Research Paper on AM Activities of 20 Ontario cities puts
us in the top 20%
4. Kitchener's completion of detailed AMPs in compliance with
provincial guidelines for funding purposes
1.b. -7
Funding Source for 12 Asset Groups
Notes: 1) Asset replacemeint valbes are Ihiiistoriiicalll valbe Lased as of IDec 20,11.
2) Asset replacemeint valbes iin birackets are 20,13 coin Stlillctiioin valbe Ibase d.
3) * Detadled asset miainageimeinit plain cornpleted 20,13 foir total Asset GrCILI�P,.
4) " DetaflIed asset miainageimeint plain cornpleted 20,13 foir Ipairtiiialll Asset GrOLIlP,.
2) Gas 1 244
4) St�orimwateir Ultilhity * 280 (705)
6) Gollfling IE irate irpirlise 22
8) Fac:lillitlies (the AIUD) **
10) Fairly & Open Area
12) Cemeteries
431
6IR
2
Asset Management Plan Results
Level of Confidence
Confidence level examines factors that influence the integrity of
the plan.
• Inventory Data
• Condition Data
• Treatment Strategies (0 & M programs and practices)
• Lifecycle Cost (0 & M work &rehab /replacement)
1.b. -9
Asset Management Plan Results
Pavement
Asset
• Roads 714 km (70% local; 30% collector); Replacement Value $416 M
Condition
• Measured by Pavement Quality Index (PQI) on a scale of 0 to 100
• Current Overall PQI is 68 — rated as FAIR
• Local Roads PQI = 60; Collectors PQI = 80
• PQI = 50, candidate for re- surfacing or reconstruction
• PQI = 25, candidate for reconstruction only
Confidence Level is 90
Service Level
• Kitchener's Level of Service target is 70 (similar to adjacent cities and region)
• Condition inspection cycle completed every 2 years; last inspection in 2012
1.b. - 10
Asset Management Plan Results
'•.• • -
a
all
70
50
30
I
Arterial Roads
r
Local (Roads
C
M
Asset Management Plan Results
Pavement Funding Scenarios
• Current deficit is $170 M
• Current funding level is $6.2 M annually
1. Maintain current funding level:
• PQI = 60 by 2025
• PQI = 50 by 2040
Not sustainable over the long term
2. Increase and sustain funding level to $12 M annually plus inflation:
• PQI = +/- 70
Sustained over the long term
3. Funding level starts at $6.2 M and increases by 2.2 % annually plus inflation:
• PQI = 60 to 70
Sustained over the long term
4. Funding level starts at $8.0 M and increases by 1.5 % annually plus inflation:
• PQI = 65
Sustained over the longterm
1.b. - 12
Asset Management Plan Results
$200,000,000
$180,000,000
$160,000,000
N
L
�a $140,000,000
c
v
$120,000,000
N
al
7
$100,000,000
c
v
x
x
w $80,000,000
c
c
Q $60,000,000
$40,000,000
$20,000,000
$0
a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Roads - Capital Costs to Rehab. & Reconstruct Current Inventory
Comparison Condition Resulting from the Scenarios
Rehab IOWA Reconstruct
Current Funding Level $6.2M Funding of $8M + 1.5%
-Funding of $ 6. 2M+ 2. 2%^^^^^^^^^^... Condition from Baseline Scenario $6.2M
Condition from Scenario 1: $12.6M . ° ° ° ° ° °.. �^ Condition from Scenario 2:$6.2M+2.2%
Condition from Scenario 3:$8M +1.5%
80.0
70.0
0
60.0
0
U
a)
>_
a)
50.0 m
o_
rn
N
a)
40.0 of
30.0
20.0
1.b. - 13
Asset Management Plan Results
Sanitary Utility
• Asset
— 800 km pipes; 11,000 manholes (replacement value $873 M)
— 22 pumping stations (replacement value $37 M)
• Condition — Good to Very Good — Condition inspection cycle completed every 12 years
B B Both better than mid age condition
A- A- No significant services outages
A- A- Demands are met
B B Current funding level reasonable for long term , nominal level of
deficit
• Confidence Level is 75
• Service Level — not published for sewers; regulatory for pumping stations; complaints prioritized;
immediate response to critical events; customer expectation is "an event -free sewer system"
1.b. - 14
Asset Management Plan Results
Sanitary Pipes -Asset Installation Profile
by Quantity
Sanitary Pipes "I'l""I'll""I'llIll""I'll""I'I Average Age
180,000
160,000
140,000
120,000
10
le
100,000
O
Year
80,000
60,000
40,000
20,000
0
Sanitary Pipes -Asset Installation Profile
by Quantity
Sanitary Pipes "I'l""I'll""I'llIll""I'll""I'I Average Age
le 10 e
50
40
30
20
10
0
I.b. - 15
10 le
10
le
Year
le 10 e
50
40
30
20
10
0
I.b. - 15
Asset Management Plan Results
Sanitary Utility Funding Strategy
Sewers
• Current funding level averages $7.5 Mannually
• Deficit by 2023 will be $15.2 M under current funding
• Maintain current funding level for current 10 year capital plan
• Optional Strategies after 2023:
1.
Annual funding
of $8.4 M
increased with
inflation
2.
Funding start at
$6 M and
increased 1%
annually plus inflation
• Result: deficit cleared and reserve established between 2023 and
2050 to fund the anticipated spike in activities after 2050
1.b. - 16
Asset Management Plan Results
$30,000,000
$25,000,000
`m
0
a $20,000,000
c
v
u
d
' $15,000,000
C
CL
x
W
M
c
$10,000,000
$5,000,000
$0
1 f
�a OS OC9 OUul , O A S 19 �S u, OQ� " 9
Sanitary Pipes - Impact on Conditions from Funding Scenarios
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII11111111 Replace IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Rehab
Case 1: Current 10 yr Funding then Avg $8.4M ^ Case 2: Current 10 yr Funding, then $6M+1%
Best Case Condition Condition from Case 1
"Condition from Case 2
100
90
80
70
60
C
O
50 0
O
U
m
40 S
30
20
10
0
1.b. - 17
Asset Management Plan Results
Sanitary Utility Funding Strategy
Pumping Stations
• Current funding level averages $1.2 M annually
• No deficit due to high risk and consequence of failure
• Maintain the current funding level for the current 10 year capital
plan
• Funding requirements after 10 year period projected to be in the
range of $0.75 M annually
• Most activities are replacement activities
• Regular updates to pumping station assessments and maintenance
requirements
1.b. - 18
Asset Management Plan Results
Water Utility
• Asset
— 760 km pipes; 4,000 hydrants; 6,500 valves (replacement value $750 M)
— 61,615 water meters (replacement value $12.75 M)
• Condition — Fair to Very Good
B- C Large amount of iron water mains; water meters aging
B A- Some water quality and watermain breakage issue
A- A- Demands are met
B- C Meters significantly unfunded at current level; potentially
significant deficit for watermains
• Confidence Level is 75 % for watermains and 90 % for water meters
• Service Level — primarily regulatory; Utility commitment is the delivery of safe
drinking water and reliable service
1.b. - 19
Asset Management Plan Results
1. b. - 20
Water Mains -Asset Installation Profile
by Quantity
Water Mains Average Age
160,000
140,000
120,000
d
ED
a
>%
100,000
c
�
L
d
CY
80,000
Q
�`'
60,000
a�
40,000
20,000
0:'a
°o
e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Year
1. b. - 20
Asset Management Plan Results
Water Utility Funding Strategy
Watermains
• Current funding level averages $6.2 M annually
• Deficit by 2023 will be $63 M under current funding
• Maintain current funding level for current 10 year capital plan
• Deficit to be addressed between 2025 to 2045
• Optional Strategies after 2023:
1.
Annual funding
of $7
M increased with inflation
2.
Funding start at
$5 M
and increased 1% annually plus inflation
• Result: deficit cleared and reserve established between 2023 and
2050 to fund the anticipated spike in activities after 2050
1.b. - 21
Asset Management Plan Results
j4b,000,UUU
$40,000,000
$35,000,000
m
0
M $30,000,000
r
c
a
3
U
$25,000,000
a
c
CL $20,000,000
x
W
C
a $15,000,000
$10,000,000
$5,000,000
SO
Water Mains - Impact of Funding Scenarios on Condition
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIReplace IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Rehab
Case 1:Current10 yrFunding then Avg $71M Case 2:Current10 yrFunding, then $5M+ 1%
Condition from Case 1 Condition from Case 2
Ideal Condition
100.0
90.0
1 ^0.0
70.0
60.0
i
rw
ru „re
Illy:
3 0. 0
1.b. -22
Asset Management Plan Results
Water Utility Funding Strategy
Water Meters
• Current funding level of $0.41 M per year is significantly below
requirements to adhere to prescribed replacement cycles
• Current deficit is $1.8 M
• Required funding level starting in 2014is$0.76 M per year plus
inflation
• Investigating water meter inventory system to improve data related
to replacement cycles.
1. b. - 23
Asset Management Plan Results
Stormwater Utility
• Asset
— 600 km pipes; 16,000 manholes; 12,000 catchbasins (replacement value $615 M)
— 50 oil & grit separators (OGS), (replacement value $15 M)
— 125 storm facilities (SWM ponds), (replacement value $89 M)
— 80km stream reaches (creeks & streams), (replacement value not yet estimated)
• Condition — Fair to Very Good — Condition inspection cycle just started —12 year cycle
Better than mid age pipes; newer facilities but some
B B A outstanding retrofits; newer OGS
Some stormwater quality issues and some flooding
Ill B B A locations; OGS almost new
Some flooding locations; need additional facilities;
. III B B C- OGS at 50% of required level
iA m c- c c All significantly underfunded at current level
• Confidence Level is 70 % on pipes & 60 % on facilities
• Service Level — not published; complaints prioritized; immediate response to critical events;
customer expectation is good drainage, no flooding, no erosion, and no contamination of
waterways or ponds.
1. b. - 24
Asset Management Plan Results
Storm Pipes -Asset Installation Profile
by Quantity
Storm Pipes ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° °° ° Average Age
,�0
120,000
0
100,000
80,000
a
0
0
0
CY
60,000
^03
40,000
1.1",
20,000
0
Storm Pipes -Asset Installation Profile
by Quantity
Storm Pipes ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° °° ° Average Age
,�0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
^°j
^oti
^03
^o� ^oh
1.1",
Year
0
40 u„
0
0
� „h r
10
0
1.b. - 25
Asset Management Plan Results
Stormwater Utility Funding Strategy
Pipes
• Current funding level averages $4.OMannually
• Deficit by 2023 will be $24 M under current funding
• Maintain current funding level for current 10 year capital plan
• Optional Strategies after 2023:
1. Annual funding of $8.2 M increased with inflation
2. Funding start at $6 M and increased 1% annually plus inflation
• Result: deficit cleared and reserve established between 2023 and
2050 to fund the anticipated spike in activities after 2050
1. b. - 26
Asset Management Plan Results
Storm Pipes - Impact of Funding Scenario on Condition
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIReplace IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Rehab
Case 1:Currentl0 yr Funding then Avg $8.2M Case 2: Current 10 yr Funding, then $6M+ 1%
Ideal Condition - Case 1 Resulting Condition
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ Case 2 Resulting Condition
$ 30,000,000 1 11
$25,000,000
`m
0
M $20,000,000
r
c
v
V
d
$15,000,000
H
C
GJ
O
X
W
M
7
C
a $10,000,000
$ 5,000,000
$0
a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a
S �`'10
177
97
837
7
07
17
47
77
7
17
7
1. b. - 27
Asset Management Plan Results
Stormwater Utility Funding Strategy
Storm Facilities (SWM Ponds)
• Current funding level is approximately $1.5 M annually
• Deficit after 10 years will be $6 M
• Maintain the current funding level for the current 10 year capital
plan
• Funding requirements after 10 year period projected to be in the
range of $1.6 M annually
• Optional Strategies after 2023:
1. Annual funding of $1.6 M increased with inflation
2. Funding start at $1.2 M and increased 1% annually plus
inflation
1. b. - 28
Asset Management Plan Results
SWM Facilities - Impact of Funding Scenarios on Condition
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Replace /Build IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Rehab
Case 1:Current10 yr Funding then Avg $1.6M Case 2:Current10 yr Funding, then $1.2M + 1%
Ideal Condition Case 1 Resulting Condition
Case 2 Resulting Condition
$ 7,000,000
$ 6,000,000
`m $5,000,000
0
v
r
c
W
$4,000,000
v
c
W
X $3,000,000
W
7
C
a
$ 2,000,000
$1,000,000
$0
a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a
177
97
837
77
07
�y
y
+t�r
^::ra
47
77
IN
IN
1. b. - 29
Asset Management Plan Results
Stormwater Utility Funding Strategy
Oil &Grit Separators (OGS)
• Current funding level is approximately $0.36 M annually
• Deficit after 10 years will be $3.4 M
• Maintain the current funding level for the current 10 year capital
plan
• Funding requirements after 10 year period projected to be in the
range of $0.22 M annually
• Next OGS replacement due in the 2070's
• Funding requirements after 2070 is projected to be $0.25 M
annually for 20 years
1.b. -30
Facilities Management Overview and
AUD and Arenas Results
Overview
Facilities Management (FM) Objective:
• For assets under the guardianship of FM: Build /Administer /Maintain /Manage a robust
Asset Management program
Facility Asset Management Activities:
• Collecting and assessing facility condition data
• Identifying and reviewing needs and estimates
• Setting prioritization for these needs :
( Repair 4 Rehabilitate 4 Replace 4 Retire )
• Assessing the effectiveness and applicability of rehabilitation treatments
• Managing and using all related information systems
Asset Portfolio:
• 150 City Owned Major and Minor Facilities representing 3,302,130 S.F.
• Over 100 Component Programs
1.b. - 31
Facilities Management Overview and
AUD and Arenas Results
Level of Service
• Use of Facility Condition Index (FCI):
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ of required work in next 5 years
FCI =
$ replacement cost of asset
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
• FCI ranges from 0 to 1
• Industry standard target is FCI less than or equal to 0.1 representing a work deficit
of no more than 10% of an asset's value
• Targets for Kitchener buildings will be set and may vary
acility is in excellent condition and is being maintained well. No deficit of work has developed.
acility is showing signs of neglect and a deficit of deferred work is building.
acility is in a failed condition and is a candidate for complete replacement /reconstruction.
1.b. -32
Facilities Management Overview and
AUD and Arenas Results
Condition Profile for the Auditorium and Arenas
• Asset assessment includes: Dom Cardillo Arena, The Twin Pad
Arenas (Kinsman and Kiwanis) and the administrative corridor
• Average condition of the Auditorium and Arenas is FCI = 0.2
• FCI = 0.2 represents deficit & current needs of almost $10.5 M
• RIVA based asset management plan spans 60 years to cover the
major life cycles and to obtain an average level of funding
requirements.
1.b. -33
Facilities Management Overview and
AUD and Arenas Results
Auditorium and Arenas Funding Options
• 2012 funding level was $440,000
• 2013 funding level was $990,000
• 2012/2013 special funding of $2.55 M for electrical, mechanical & other
upgrades related to expansion of facility
• Deficit work (based on FCI = 0.2), will need to be addressed over several years
Funding Scenarios:
1. Annual funding of $0.99 M annually plus 2 % annual inflation for 60 years
Result: sustainable for the mid -term but shortfall grows in the 40 -60 years timeframe
2. Annual funding of $0.44 M plus inflation over the next 60 years
Result: funding is not sustainable in the mid and long term
1.b. -34
Facilities Management Overview and
110.0co.000
35.000.00❑
30.0CD.000
�CD.UUU.Uuu
7n.nrn.nnn
I CD.UUU.UUU
-in nrrr nnn
5.0G0.000
U
AUD and Arenas Results
Baseline Investinent
-ri,nnn.nnn
7n in m in -Pn7n Tnpr-. Tnqn mr. -Pn4n �,n4r. 7nrin 7nri r. Tnnn -,nnr. -Pn7n 7n7 r,
IBUCICIGI sholtrall Annual Cosl
Scenario 1: Applying the 2013 level of funding of $990,000 (escalated by
2 % per year) over the next 60 years
The graph shows that this investment scenario provides an acceptable
level of funding for the mid-term, but a shortfall (shown in red) grows in
the 40-60 year timeframe.
1.b. -35
Facilities Management Overview and
AUD and Arenas Results
0.27!
0.25
0.22:
0.20
0. IT
0.15
0. 12:
0.10
0.07:
0.05
0.020
2010 2315 2023 2025 2030 2335 2040 2045 2050 2055 2050 2165 2070 2075
FGI FBI fTrtj
Scenario 1: The line in blue represents the expected FCI (where lower is
better). It is brought inside the target of 0.1 and kept close to this target
until after 2055, at which point the condition of the facility will begin to
deteriorate markedly.
1.b. -36
Facilities Management Overview and
°1 lu'um.mu
°lUu'um.mu
wu,uuu.uuu
sn.nnn.nnn
7n.nnn.nnn
nn.nnn.nnn
nn.nnn.nnn
40.000.000
30.000.000
20.000.000
10.000,000
AUD and Arenas Results
Scenario 2 Investment
Under this approach, the facility falls into poor condition rapidly. The
budget chart shows a rapidly growing deficit of unfunded work (the area in
red).
1.b. -37
Facilities M Overview a
AUD a Arenas R
u—
o—
u—
o— .
uA
o�
u-
o� .
U-
=m.
scenario FCI
U. & ] _ .. ... ..
2010 ai 2020 2025 2030 2035 « 245 20355 am 2005 Gee
FCC Fo JagA
Scenario 2 | The FCIchart shows the condition degrading dramatic8lly, as
I stays above and moves farther away from the target value (shown as
red line).
�.�.- 38
\'
/
Q
U. & ] _ .. ... ..
2010 ai 2020 2025 2030 2035 « 245 20355 am 2005 Gee
FCC Fo JagA
Scenario 2 | The FCIchart shows the condition degrading dramatic8lly, as
I stays above and moves farther away from the target value (shown as
red line).
�.�.- 38
Roadmap for Next Steps
The following activities are in order of priority and apply to all asset
groups:
1. Develop a Data Management Plan including an assessment of the
asset registers
2. Establish existing and future Levels of Service
3. Develop methodology for Life Cycle costing
4. Develop methodology for Demand Planning
5. Establish the process and resources needed to fully implement
RIVA across the remaining assets
6. Develop the methodology to address core services /outsourcing,
delivery of services (assessment of how we do business)
7. Development of an Asset management reporting format
1.b. -39
Roadmap for Next Steps
Suggested timelines for 12 Asset Groups
1. b. - 40
207,9
2074
2015
2016
29f 7
ID,
Task Misne
Stall
Finish
Dwation
Q?
Q.,
013
Q4
013
Q4
0r
I Q2
I QQ
I Q4
Q1
Q2
03
04
1
Q11
Q,3
Q4
I
Water Ulilty
011 /0 1,� 2015
28„06)2017
130w
2
Gas Utillity
011 107,"201 4
30 112,(2016
1130 Bw
3
Wasiewateir (samitary), Ubillity
0,6�11 0,12014
23JO3,�201 7
112 8,. Bw
4
Stormwater Utility
031'02 "2014
211109,201 6
11 37.6w
5
Parking IEinterl
011 01,1'2015
08107�2016
79,,.4w
6
Golifing Enterprise
03�021201 4
09 10 1 � 2015,
49w
7
I'lleet
02/03,12015
281 "03)2016
5 6,,.2 w
8
Facillities
03/06,121713
19„01,p2015
8 5,.2 w
9
Roads & Traffic
011 04�201 3
04101X2017
11 96,.,5w
10
Pairks �& Open Space
011 107,"201 5
28„x112,(2016
78,.2w
III
Forestry
021'O212O�15
06 11 1 �2015,
40w
12
Ceirnieteriles
011 I'll 0,12015
19107p2016
41,.Bw
1. b. - 40
The One and Only Rule of Asset
Management
If a service is not fully funded,
- it is not sustainable
And if it is not sustainable,
- it will eventually fail or fall to an
unacceptable level
1.b. - 41