Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-04-01 HERITAGE KITCHENER MINUTES APRIL 1. 2014 CITY OF KITCHENER The Heritage Kitchener Committee met this date, commencing at 5:03 p.m. Present: Mr. G. Zeilstra-Chair Councillor F. Etherington, A. Hooykaas, E. Rudland, and Messrs. S. Burrows, and S. Thomson. Staff: M. Drake, Heritage Planner D. Livingstone, Committee Administrator 1. CSD-14-024 - HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION HPA 2014-IV-003 - 883 DOON VILLAGE ROAD - PROPOSED NEW ROOF The Committee considered Community Services Department report CSD-14-024, dated March 17, 2014 recommending approval of Heritage Permit Application HPA 2014-IV-003 to permit the installation of Enviroshake or asphalt shingles and roof vents at 883 Doon Village Road. Ms. M. Drake presented the item advising that the property located at 883 Doon Village Road is designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act for historic and architectural value. She stated that the applicant is seeking permission to remove and replace the existing cedar roof which is 29 years old, with Enviroshake or asphalt shingles and roof vents at the rear elevation. She indicated that Enviroshake is being proposed as an alternative because it is available in a weathered grey colour and installed in a similar manner as a cedar roof. Ms. Drake reviewed the merits of the application and noted that the designating by-law does not reference the roofing materials. On motion by Mr. S. Burrows- it was resolved: "That pursuant to Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Heritage Permit Application HPA 2014-IV-003, be approved to permit the installation of Enviroshake or asphalt shingles and roof vents (rear elevation) at the property municipally addressed as 883 Doon Village Road in accordance with the supporting information submitted with the application and subject to the following condition: i) That the final location and details for the roof vents on the rear elevation be reviewed and approved by Heritage Planning staff." 2. HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT(HIA) - WILLIAMSBURG SOUTH COMMUNITY - SOUTH WEST CORNER OF BLEAMS AND FISCHER-HALLMAN ROAD The Committee considered the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) for the Henhoeffer Farm House and Williamsburg School House, prepared for RBJ Schlegel Holdings Limited by Carson Woods Architects Limited,dated March 2009 and revised November 2013. Ms. Drake introduced the item advising the HIA is related to a proposed plan of subdivision and is a requirement for the planning process. She stated that there is a designated heritage property located on the subject lands; and, a historically significant schoolhouse located adjacent to the property. She indicated that comments received from the Committee this date would be considered during the planning application review. Mr. Vaughan Bender, RBJ Schlegel Holdings Limited, introduced the HIA, advising the proposal for the Williamsburg South Community is to develop an adult-oriented neighbourhood with a mixed use community providing a variety of housing types with supporting commercial, recreational and open space land uses to foster community identity, interaction and healthy lifestyles. He reviewed the proposal in context of the Rosenberg Secondary Plan, with reference to the draft plan of subdivision which maintains the heritage vista between the farmhouse and school house. Mr. Robert Anderson, Carson Woods Architects Limited, presented the HIA, noting that the revision of the 2009 application includes preservation of the heritage attributes of the Henhoeffer farmhouse and the Williamsburg School. He reviewed the heritage assets of the HERITAGE KITCHENER MINUTES APRIL 1. 2014 -9 - CITY OF KITCHENER 2. HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT(HIA) - WILLIAMSBURG SOUTH COMMUNITY - SOUTH WEST CORNER OF BLEAMS AND FISCHER-HALLMAN ROAD (CONT'D) 1890 Henhoeffer farmhouse, noting that the porch at the back of the existing home has been enclosed. He referred to the east elevation suggesting that changes occurred to the porch in 1919. He stated that the recommendations for preservation for the exterior of the Henhoeffer farmhouse are as follows: the roof and overall silhouette form of the house., soffit brackets., brickwork on the east and north sides; the one original sash window in the old dining room; the original front doors and second level porch door; and, the carriage platform. He reviewed the recommendations for preservation for the interior of the house: the decorative plaster moulding; the burled hardwood faux painted doors; original window surrounds; contrasting striped wood floors; original baseboards and wainscoting; and, original hardware. Mr. Anderson then reviewed the heritage attributes of the Williamsburg School, indicating that the building was built in approximately 1862, has been a private residence since 1967 and was designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act by By-law 87-309. He detailed the heritage attributes of the schoolhouse, including: its position as cornerstone of the rural Williamsburg community from its early days through most of the 20th century; rubble stone facades; belfry; fence; and, the woodshed. He referred to the lands located at 1198 Fischer- Hallman Road, which were most recently added to the subdivision proposal, and contain a barn structure. He indicated that it is the recommendation to not proceed with any preservation of the barn, based on its current condition and the use of contemporary materials during repair, as well as lack of evidentiary proof of its historical connection to the Henhoeffer farmhouse. Mr. Anderson continued his review of the HIA and outlined the shadow impact analysis contained within the Report. He stated that the medium density housing proposed for the precinct around the Henhoeffer farmhouse is unlikely to produce any adverse urban design or shadow impact on the heritage asset, if consideration is given for reasonable setback and height limitation in accordance with the zoning recommendation; and, if the east and north facades remain visible from the open passive recreational areas. He noted that the original farm lane would connect to Fischer-Hallman Road and would be a pedestrian trail, and indicated that it was originally the main entrance for the farmhouse, further demonstrating consideration to the heritage resources within the context of the new development. He stated that the farmhouse will likely be a common element to serve the residential uses, with the brackets of the roof to be the height limit of surrounding properties. He then reviewed the shadow analysis for the Williamsburg School, noting the conceptual design and that urban design considerations will mitigate concerns, and indicated that at 30m the shadow impact is nominal. He noted that the open connect across to the passive recreation area on the east and north sides maintains the visibility from Bleams Road and Fischer-Hallman Road to the schoolhouse. He reviewed the summary and conservation recommendations advising that for both heritage assets, ground vibration assessments and ongoing monitoring will be conducted to done to determine a threshold during construction. Mr. Matt Minomiya, Stantec, reviewed engineering considerations of design for the stormwater management facility. He noted the subject lands are located in a low area within the Regional floodplain advising that the intent of the stormwater management facility is to provide water quality and control and to create and maintain a naturalized area. He indicated that the current Ianeway will have to be replaced, and a sanitary trunk sewer has been identified, which may have an impact to trees in the area; however, he expressed intent to maintain the vista and green areas in their existing conditions to maintain views. He indicated that landscaping with efforts to protect environmental and heritage features will be considered during the detailed design phase, and indicated that the grading around the heritage home would receive deliberation to ensure minimal disturbance. Mr. Chris Pigeon, GSP Group, provided closing considerations on the HIA, indicating that the Henhoeffer farmhouse is a focal point of the Williamsburg South Community Plan. He pointed out the linear green space, noting the potential for an extended community trail throughout the subdivision with future consideration to extending the connection beneath Fischer-Hallman Road. He stated that the farmhouse would be in a prominent location within the subdivision and provided assurance that the thirteen trees clustered in the north and east of the heritage farmhouse will be preserved as part of the heritage landscape surrounding the dwelling. HERITAGE KITCHENER MINUTES APRIL 1. 2014 -10 - CITY OF KITCHENER 2. HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT(HIA) - WILLIAMSBURG SOUTH COMMUNITY - SOUTH WEST CORNER OF BLEAMS AND FISCHER-HALLMAN ROAD (CONT'D) Mr. S. Burrows expressed general support for the proposal and encouraged preserving green space through use of design and building height. Ms. Drake pointed out that from a heritage perspective, recognizing negative impacts of proximity, shadow, and design is important. Mr. Anderson responded that the HIA is not presenting a final outcome and restated the objective to ensure the virtue of the heritage attributes are preserved as the process continues. He stated that a design could be proposed provided it represents a reasonable alternative. Mr. Bender noted that the maximum flexibility is the best alternative at this stage, as taller buildings are erected toward Bleams Road impact to the heritage features increases. Mr. G. Zeilstra inquired if there would be a buffer required to separate the Williamsburg Schoolhouse from the subdivision development. Mr. Anderson responded that there is an existing fence surrounding the property and pointed out that as it is under private ownership fencing would be at the owner's discretion. Ms. Drake indicated that fencing may be a requirement from City Engineering and Operations departments. Ms. Drake responded to questions regarding next steps and if the proposal is likely to be brought back to Heritage Kitchener during the planning process. She stated that Heritage Planning Staff will review any concerns to ensure they are mitigated and principles are considered during the detailed construction and site plan approval phase and will then come back to the Committee if required. 3. ADJOURNMENT On motion, this meeting adjourned at 6:17 p.m. Daphne Livingstone Committee Administrator