Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFCS-14-104- Dog Designation Committee Appeal - Mackay and SchmuckStaff Report rTC.�r R finance and Corporate Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Mayor C. Zehr and Members of Council DATE OF MEETING: June 16, 2014 SUBMITTED BY: Dog Designation Appeal Committee PREPARED BY: Daphne Livingstone, Committee Administrator, 519- 741 -2200 x7275 WARD(S) INVOLVED: All DATE OF REPORT: May 28, 2014 REPORT NO.: FCS -14 -104 SUBJECT: DANGEROUS DOG DESIGNATION APPEAL — MACKAY AND SCHMUCK RECOMMENDATION: That the decision of the Dog Designation Appeal Committee regarding an appeal filed by Christine Mackay and Bradley Schmuck, wherein the Committee affirms the Dangerous Dog Designation applied to their dog `Ruben' by the Kitchener - Waterloo and North Waterloo Humane Society and assigns conditions for keeping of said dog, be ratified and confirmed. BACKGROUND: On March 19, 2014, the Kitchener - Waterloo and North Waterloo Humane Society designated `Ruben', a Rhodesian Ridgeback breed of dog owned by Ms. Christine Mackay and Mr. Bradley Schmuck, as a Dangerous Dog, resulting from an unprovoked attack on a human, on February 23, 2014. The Office of the City Clerk subsequently received correspondence from Ms. Mackay and Mr. Schmuck appealing the Dangerous Dog Designation; and accordingly, a Notice of Hearing was issued to the Appellants (Christine Mackay and Bradley Schmuck) and the Respondent (the Kitchener - Waterloo and North Waterloo Humane Society). REPORT: On May 5, 2014, the Dog Designation Appeal Committee considered the evidence and exhibits introduced by all parties to this hearing. A Statement of Facts was presented on behalf of the Respondent and Appellants which proposed modified conditions for keeping `Ruben'. The modified conditions relate to section a) ii, which originally required the construction of a pen and was modified to allow the construction of a fence to secure the dog in the yard of the residence; and b), which originally required `Ruben' to be caged or penned when in the presence of children under the age of 16 and was modified to provide for the exception of the dog owners' children. The remainder of the conditions required by the Humane Society were unchanged in the proposal presented to the Committee. 3. -1 The Committee then affirmed the Dangerous Dog Designation with the following revised conditions for keeping the Dangerous Dog: That the owner shall: a) keep the Dangerous Dog, when it is on the lands and premises of the owner, confined: i. within the owner's dwelling; or, ii. in a yard with a fence of approximately 6 feet of height or higher, such fence to be adequate to keep the dog confined to the yard to the satisfaction of the Poundkeeper; or iii. wearing muzzle and on a leash not to exceed 1.8 metres (six feet) in length, and under the control of a person of at least 16 years of age. b) When children other than the children of the dog's owner(s) are in the owner(s)' dwelling, to keep the dog caged, penned or under control of a person of at least 16 years of age. c) securely attach a muzzle as defined in Chapter 530 (Dogs) to the Dangerous Dog at all times when it is off the owner's property and not caged or otherwise penned or confined to the satisfaction of the Poundkeeper. d) have a microchip inserted in the Dangerous Dog by a licensed veterinarian and to permit the Poundkeeper to verify the implantation of such microchip and supply the microchip information to the Poundkeeper. e) provide the Poundkeeper with the new address and telephone number of the owner within two (2) working days of moving the Dangerous Dog. f) provide the Poundkeeper with the name, address and telephone number of the new owner within two (2) working days of selling or giving away the Dangerous Dog. g) advise the Poundkeeper within two (2) working days of the death of the Dangerous Dog. h) advise the Poundkeeper forthwith if the Dangerous Dog is running at large or has bitten or attacked any person or animal. i) purchase and display, at the entrance to the owner's dwelling, to which a person would normally approach, and at any other place on the property as directed by the Poundkeeper, a warning sign or warning signs provided by the Poundkeeper. The sign(s) shall be posted in such a manner that it/they cannot be easily removed by passersby and the sign posted at the entrance which a person would normally approach must be clearly visible to a person approaching the entrance or, when in a multiple unit dwelling, the owner will provide the name of the property owner and property manager if any and allow the Dog Designation Appeal Committee to request that person to post a sign. j) To have the dog sterilized and to provide a proof satisfactory to the Poundkeeper that such procedure has been performed. 3. -2 k) provide a copy of this designation to any person who keeps or harbours the Dangerous Dog. 1) cause the Dangerous Dog to wear the tag or tag(s) provided by the Poundkeeper at all times. m) not to keep or harbour the Dangerous Dog in a multiple dwelling or lodging house and where the owner's current dwelling is a multiple dwelling or lodging house the dog may be kept or harboured at other premises subject to all the conditions imposed on the keeping of the dog under this by -law. ALIGNMENT WITH CITY OF KITCHENER STRATEGIC PLAN: Enforcing the provisions of Municipal Code Chapter 530 (Dogs) aligns with the Strategic Plan by ensuring that the City is a safe place to live for all residents, while providing a fair and equitable process for dog owners to seek redress of designations applied to their dogs. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: There are no financial implications associated with this report. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: All those in attendance at the May 5, 2014 Hearing, were advised of the Committee's decision and that it would be considered at the June 16, 2014 Council meeting. In addition, a Notice of Decision was served on the Appellant and the Respondents via registered mail on May 12, 2014; thereby, further notifying both parties of when the Committee's decision would be considered by Council and the process for registering as a delegation. ACKNOWLEDGED BY: Dan Chapman, DCAO, Finance & Corporate Services 3. -3