Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCSD-14-095 - Termite Control and Enforcement Report Staff Report I rTC'.�► t .R Community Services Department wmkitchener.ca REPORT TO: Community and Infrastructure Services Committee DATE OF MEETING: September 8, 2014 SUBMITTED BY: Mike Seiling, Director of Building/CBO, 519-741-2200 ext. 7669 PREPARED BY: Tim Benedict, Manager of Building, 519-741-2200 ext. 7645 WARD(S) INVOLVED: All Wards DATE OF REPORT: August 13, 2014 REPORT NO.: CSD-14-095 SUBJECT: Termite Control and Enforcement Report RECOMMENDATION: That no funding be provided to individual home owners for the treatment of termites on private property; and, That staff be directed to undertake a review of the existing by-law Chapter 689 of the City of Kitchener Municipal Code; and further, That staff be directed to implement a Public Education Program about termites for the entire city starting in 2015. BACKGROUND: Previously submitted report CSD-14-080 "Insect/Pests Control and Enforcement" was discussed at the August 11, 2014 Community and Infrastructure Services Committee and further resolved at Special Council "That consideration of the following recommendation be deferred to the September 8, 2014 Community and Infrastructure Committee meeting: "That Community Services Department report CSD-14-080 be referred to the 2015 Budget process for consideration of long term funding, and, That funding assistance is allocated as outlined in Chapter 689 (Termite- Wood-Destroying Insects Control) of the City of Kitchener Municipal Code, and, The funding assistance should be limited to $2,000. for each of the 13 properties that have had observed termite infestation, for residents that are willing to proceed with treatment of their property in 2014, and further," 9 - 1 That "staff be directed to provide additional information on the following matters; a) potential funding options to provide assistance to homeowners to address termite infestation; b) investigate best practices undertaken by other municipalities to address termites; c) potential of having Dr. Timothy Myles, Termite Control Officer, City of Guelph address the Committee on possible termite mitigation measures; d) examine whether termites are covered under homeowner insurance policies; and, e) consult the Provincial Government as to possible financial assistance that could be provided to address this issue." REPORT: The flowing report is separated into individual items that reflect the items requested by council for staff to provide additional information on. a) Potential Funding Options 1) Status Quo — Keep and retain the current by-law 689, and develop an application/agreement process for grant and/or loans and ability to charge back to taxes in the event of default on payment. A funding source would be required and additional resource time to review and process will apply. 2) Minor By-Law Modifications - Change by-law 689 to remove grants but keep portion on loans 3) Revise By-Law - Revise by-law 689 to remove financial assistance and include provision for treatment to be completed by the municipality and costs applied to the taxes (similar to other property standards processes) 4) Budget 2015 - Include a new Termite Public Education Program in the 2015 Budget process to advise all residents of termites with facts and preventative actions that can be taken 5) Budget 2015 - Include a new Termite Program in the 2015 Budget process to hire an outside company for the purposes of research, treatment and possible eradication. Direction would be required on whether this would cover just the current affected area or the entire City? b) Best Practice of Other Cities How do other municipalities handle termites? 1) City of Guelph The City of Guelph in 2011 began a termite management program lead by Dr. Tim Myles in an attempt to reduce the termite population in Guelph. This program is in addition to requiring home owners to chemically treat their property where required, inspection of all material leaving the property and a required inspection prior to selling the property. No funding is provided to individual home owners for treatment or structural repair of properties however the experimental termite management program is funded entirely by the Municipality, Guelph budget's approximately $150,000 a year for this program. 9 - 2 2) Town of Kincardine The town of Kincardine provides three options to comply with any building permits within termite areas. Option 1 is chemical treatment of the property; Option 2 is constructing any new buildings as per the Building Code prescriptive requirements or Option 3 to purpose an alternative solution to the Building Division. The City of Kincardine does not actively pursue owners to treat their property unless work is purposed on the property or under their by-law require treatment where the termite inspector deems necessary. The Town of Kincardine maintains a policy GG.2.19 Municipal Loans to Ratepayers to loan homeowners a minimum $5000 for a list of projects, termite treatment is included however Kincardine has indicated they have never loaned any monies for termite treatment. 3) City of Toronto In 2006 the City of Toronto added a $50,000 line item to their budget for a "Public Information and Education Program Regarding Termite Identification, Treatment and Eradication" In 2013 it appears this funding and reserve were closed out. Currently the City of Toronto's by-law Chapter 629-9 reads "All properties shall at all times be kept free of rodents, vermin, insects and other pests and from conditions which may encourage infestation by pests." c) Council Info Session City staff has made arrangements with Dr. Myles to be in attendance September 8t" for a short PowerPoint presentation. Dr. Myles also offered the following information about the Trap, Treat and Release (TTR) in Guelph; - TTR is being run through an experimental permit issued by the Pest Management Regulatory Authority (PMRA) - TTR is limited to the City of Guelph and would not be allowed to be performed in the City of Kitchener - The TTR experimental permit runs until the end of 2016 Dr. Myles also offered the following suggestions to our situation in Kitchener; - TTR could be replaced with entomopathogenic nematodes which doesn't require a permit for the purchase and application - Install monitoring traps along with the entomopathogenic nematodes treatment - Explore a new biological method with Dr. Myles to seek approval through PMRA for treatment in Kitchener as an experimental test d) Insurance Coverage Upon contacting Insurance Bureau of Canada (IBC) staff was informed that "they are not aware of any insurance company in Canada that will offer such coverage..., loss or damage caused by insects is a standard exclusion in all Canadian home insurance policies, and always has been." The reasoning IBC provided that such losses are not deemed to be insurable is because if proper construction and maintenance is employed, such losses are preventable. 9 - 3 e) Provincial Funding Early reports indicate the termite control program was set-up in 1964 with the Ministry of Economics and Development and the City of Toronto. In 1975 the termite control program was administered by the Pesticides Control Section of the Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE). This program covered six areas, namely a survey and monitoring component, a research component, a technical training and support component, a public education component, an incentive grant component and a municipal component. The incentive grant component provided provincial grants to home occupants for the control of termites on residential properties where the municipality has entered into a termite control agreement with the Ministry of the Environment. The grant would cover 60% of the combined cost of chemical soil treatment and wood-soil separation to a maximum of CDN $2000. The province would also pay 60% of the cost of soil pre-treatment for new construction, to CDN $1000. These grants ended in 1992 when the Provincial Ministry of the Environment's Termite Control Program ceased to provide funds to assist homeowners with the cost of chemical treatments. As part of the agreement between the municipality and the Ministry of the Environment the municipality was also required to pass an appropriate by-law enabling it to enforce termite control. A recent conversation with a representative of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing (MMAH) advised no such funding exists or is budgeted for termites. ALIGNMENT WITH CITY OF KITCHENER STRATEGIC PLAN: This report aligns with Community Priority: Quality of Life which states "Our shared vision is for Kitchener to be a community that invests in maintaining basic services..." Per strategic direction 8, this report supports the city working with partners to create a culture of safety in our community. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Prior to having Council direction for funding it is difficult to estimate financial implications. Some rough estimates of costs could be as follows; a) Short Term — For Briargate and Greenock at the proposed $2000 per household 13 Properties = $26,000 or 20 Properties = $407000 b) Long Term — Further research and costing would be required during the 2015 Budget process from $20,000 - $1507000 c) Public Education Program to get facts and tips out to residents $20,000 Should council decided to provide funding for the treatment of termites it should be noted that this would open the City up for requests of funding for the treatment or repair from other insects or pests. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the council / committee meeting. ACKNOWLEDGED BY: Michael May, Deputy CAO Community Services Department 9 - 4