Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFCS-16-030 - 2015 Year-End Variance Report REPORT TO: Finance and Corporate Services DATE OF MEETING: March 7, 2016 SUBMITTED BY: Ryan Hagey, Director of Financial Planning 519-741-2200 Ext 7353 PREPARED BY: Debra Fagerdahl, Manager of Financial Planning 519-741-2200 Ext 7114 WARD(S) INVOLVED: All DATE OF REPORT: February 22, 2016 REPORT NO.: FCS-16-030 SUBJECT: 2015 Year-End Variance Report ________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION: For Information BACKGROUND: This is the third and final report to Council regarding the City the 2015 budget. The report and attached schedules include infor tax supported services · rate supported enterprises/utilities, and · supplementary information related to investment income · REPORT: Overall, the City ended 2015 with results that were within 1% of contributors to an overall small net positive variance were the enterprise, and Tax supported operations. Year-end positions fo summarized in the table on the following page. *** This information is available in accessible formats upon req Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. IF2 - 1 2015 Summary Results ($000's) Two examples are provided below to assist in interpreting the 2015 The first line of the table shows that Tax Supported Operations · surplus of $981,000 on budgeted expenses of $164,558,000, which variance of 0.60% of total expenses. The bottom line of the table shows that Total City Operations en · surplus of $3,849,000 on budgeted expenses of $363,908,000, whic variance of 1.06% of total expenses. Additional details about tax supported operations and the enterp balance of the report. Operating Fund – Tax Base (Schedule 1) The City ended the year with an operating surplus of $981,000 in t This equates to a 0.60% positive variance from the operating exp The surplus in tax supported operations was transferred to the T Fund, which ended the year with a balance of $1.8M. The Tax Sta is still well below its minimum target balance of $5.4M. It is year since 2006 that tax-supported operations have yielded a sur Significant variances (over $200,000) are summarized below. Addi identifying the primary factor contributing to variances that ex the budget are included in Schedule 1. IF2 - 2 Significant Variances (over $200,000) Infrastructure Services Department: Operations – Administration had a deficit of $372,000 largely d · professional services and increased costs related to Regional wo Operations – Region had a surplus of $367,000 due to increased · additional winter maintenance work. Some costs related to the Re other areas of the Operations budget, like Administration, and c offsetting deficit in those areas. Operations – Road Maintenance had a deficit of $229,000 due to · road patches required. Operations – Sportsfields, Trails & Parks had a deficit of $274 · start to the repair season and an overage in the water budget. Operations – Winter Maintenance had a surplus of $428,000 due t · snow/ice at year-end. This surplus was transferred to the Winter per policy. General Expenses: General Expenses – Other had a deficit of $228,000 due to legal · of budget. Gapping had a deficit of $301,000 due to actual staffing costs · budget than in prior years. General Revenue: Payments in Lieu (PIL) had a surplus of $827,000 due retroactiv · assessments on the Region’s new transit facility, the Kitchener and the Central Library parking lots. Investment Income had a surplus of $466,000 due to higher inves · balances. Penalties and Interest had a surplus of $211,000 due to higher · Sundry Income had a surplus of $393,000 due to Ice Strom Assist · funding. IF2 - 3 Building Enterprise (Schedule 2) 2015 Summary Results ($000's) The Building Enterprise had a surplus of $949,000 which was bett deficit of $783,000. The positive variance was largely due to hi all sectors except for high rise apartment building. Golf Courses (Schedule 3) 2015 Summary Results ($000's) The Golf Enterprise broke even which is very close to the small $25,000. Parking Enterprise (Schedule 4) 2015 Summary Results ($000's) The Parking Enterprise had a surplus of $511,000, which was more surplus of $77,000. The positive variance was largely due to inc owned parking facilities at City Hall, Grand River Hospital and lower than forecasted taxes for the Civic District parking garag Water Utility (Schedule 5) 2015 Summary Results ($000's) The Water Utility had a deficit of $2.2M, which was worse than t $29,000. The variance was due to lower than expected consumption expected water main breaks (water not billed and increased repai IF2 - 4 Sanitary Sewer Utility (Schedule 6) 2015 Summary Results ($000's) The Sanitary Sewer Utility had a deficit of $531,000 which was m $176,000. The variance was due to lower than expected consumpti with the Water Utility. The negative variance was offset by lowe and repair costs. Storm Sewer Utility (Schedule 7) 2015 Summary Results ($000's) The Storm Sewer Utility had a surplus of $243,000 which was more surplus of $137,000 largely due to higher than expected growth. Gas Utility (Schedule 8) 2015 Summary Results ($000's) Gas Delivery was largely on budget with a small positive varianc Programs had a surplus of $725,000 primarily due to rental water than expected. This surplus was offset by gas delivery sales bei to the warmer weather at the end of 2015 and higher than expecte inventory management. Gas Supply had a surplus of $7.5M which is more than the budgete was largely due to the price of gas being lower than budgeted, b consumption due to the warm weather at the end of 2015. This sur was considered when establishing gas supply prices in November o the surplus will be returned to customers through a lower supply Gas Transportation had deficit of $1.2M which was worse than the $69,000. This was largely due higher than expected gas transport IF2 - 5 Investment Report (Schedule 9) All investments made were in accordance with the City’s investme investment yields have averaged 1.47%, and average short term in remained high. Investment income had a surplus of $466,000. ALIGNMENT WITH CITY OF KITCHENER STRATEGIC PLAN: The recommendation of this report supports the achievemen vision through the delivery of core service. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Financial implications are discussed above and detailed in the a COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: Inform – This report has been posted publicly as part of the age Dan Chapman, Deputy CAO (Finance and Corporate Services) ACKNOWLEDGED BY: IF2 - 6 IF2 - 7 IF2 - 8 IF2 - 9 IF2 - 10 IF2 - 11 IF2 - 12 IF2 - 13 IF2 - 14 IF2 - 15 IF2 - 16 IF2 - 17 IF2 - 18 IF2 - 19 IF2 - 20 IF2 - 21