Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFCS-16-067 - E16-026 Consultant Services - Road Reconstruction - Rehabilitation Geotech Investigation Design REPORT TO: Committee of the Whole DATE OF MEETING: 2016-04-25 SUBMITTED BY: Michelle Palmer-Novakovic, Director of Supply Services 519-741-2200 ext. 7214 PREPARED BY: Laurie Stecho, Supervisor of Purchasing 519-741-2200 ext. 7089 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Wards 2, 3, 8, 9 and 10 DATE OF REPORT: 2016-04-08 REPORT NO.: FCS-16-067 SUBJECT: E16-026 Consultant Services – Road Reconstruction / Rehabilitation Geotechnical Investigation and Design ___________________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION: That Expression of Interest E16-026 Consultant Services – Road Reconstruction / Rehabilitation Geotechnical Investigation and Design, be awarded to Englobe Corp., Kitchener, Ontario, at their estimated fee of $239,445., including contingencies, provisional in-situ infiltration testing and environmental testing allowance of $144,495. plus H.S.T. of $31,127.85, for a total of $270,572.85, based on a satisfactory contract being negotiated and an upset fee being established. BACKGROUND: This contract is for geotechnical investigation for road reconstruction/rehabilitation work planned and anticipated for 2017 to 2019. The purpose of geotechnical investigation and design is to ensure that all aspects of surface and subsurface soil conditions are thoroughly understood prior to the start of detailed design or final budgeting for any capital infrastructure remediation works. This permits adequate forewarning of any potential problems related to surface or subsurface soil conditions that may pre-exist at the proposed work location, and allows for adequate mitigation strategies to be developed in relation to any potential problems that may be discovered. Such strategies may include making appropriate allowances in necessary budget, design, project execution, and environmental remediation at proper timeframes in the project's life in order to appropriately deal with issues. Doing so removes risks that would otherwise occur to project budget, execution, and timing at the time of construction or the potential for the unexpected discovery of unsuitable soil conditions at that time. *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. 1.iv. - 1 A consultant is required due to the use of large expensive, highly specialized equipment. This includes a mobile drilling rig, sample retrieval and storage facilities, and a fully outfitted and accredited soils and material testing laboratory. REPORT: In accordance with Chapter 170 of the Municipal Code pertaining to the Selection of Professional Services/Consultants, a Consultant’s Review Committee was established consisting of R. Dredge, Corridor Management Technologist, D. Lupsa, Design and Construction Project Manager, B. Garcia, Engineering Construction Project Manager and L. Stecho, Supervisor of Purchasing. Expressions of interest were advertised publicly on the City of Kitchener website and on the internet through the Ontario Public Buyers Association Electronic Tendering Information System relative to this project. Documents were downloaded by twenty-six (26) interested parties and by the closing date of Tuesday February 16, 2016, ten (10) responses had been received. The review committee met on Tuesday March 1, 2016, to review the submissions and a shortlist of three (3) candidates* was selected for further interviews. The Committee met on Wednesday March 23, 2016 to interview the shortlisted candidates. The Committee recommends awarding the project to Englobe Corp., Kitchener, Ontario. The Committee rated consultants on the following criteria: • Evaluation of Proposed Project Manager • Completeness of Proposal • Qualifications / Expertise • Variety & Quality of Disciplines In House / In Consortium • Past Performance • Knowledge of the City (re: this area) • Amount of City Work Completed in the Past • Proposed Project Team • Effect of Interview • Cost of Consultant’s Fees • Effectiveness of Work Plan A listing of the responding parties follows for your reference: Aecon Materials Engineering Caledon ON DBA Engineering Ltd. Vaughan ON DST Consulting Engineers Inc. Waterloo ON Englobe Corp. Kitchener ON * exp Services Inc. Cambridge ON GHD Limited Waterloo ON 1.iv. - 2 Golder Associated Ltd. Cambridge ON * Peto MacCallum Ltd. Kitchener ON * V.A. Wood (Guelph) Incorporated Guelph ON WSP Canada Inc. Cambridge ON *Shortlisted candidates ALIGNMENT WITH CITY OF KITCHENER STRATEGIC PLAN: The recommendation of this report supports the achievement of the city’s strategic vision through the delivery of core service. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: In addition to the costs anticipated in this tender, the design and implementation of these types of projects typically involves city staff and resources from across the corporation. These costs are included in the line item "Projected Costs: Staff Time/Permitting/Material testing", and will be itemized when they exceed $125,000. Included in this line item are staff time and expenses for all city staff in support of the project such as Engineering, Kitchener Utilities, and Transportation Planning. The line item also includes all regulatory permitting, geotechnical and material testing, detouring and traffic control, alternate access and parking requirements and any other miscellaneous costs. Projects utilizing in-house staff will include costs for inspection during construction and contract administration. The net cost for this expression of interest (A), is fair and reasonable for a purchase of this scope and the upset limit is within the budget allowance (B) provided within the budget. Funding for this purchase is included within the approved capital budgets. The estimated surplus (D) will remain within the various accounts, and will be used to fund future construction. 1.iv. - 3 Expression of Interest E16-026 Geotechnical for 2018 and 2019 Reconstruction Projects The total budget for all phases of this project is $ 289,634.00 Estimated Cost for this Phase of Work Expression of Interest E16-026 costs, including HST 270,572.85 less: HST rebate (26,913.61) Net Cost Being Awarded 243,659.24 A Costs Incurred to Date - Projected Costs: Staff Time/Permitting/Material Testing 10,000.00 Total Estimated Cost for this Phase of Work $ 253,659.24 C Budget for this Phase of Work AIRP - Sanitary Utility 128,045.00 AIRP - Storm Water Utility 64,023.00 AIRP - Water Utility 86,292.00 AIRP - Intensification Allowance (DC) 2,024.00 Fed Gas Tax 9,250.00 Total Budget for this Phase of Work $ 289,634.00 B Estimated Surplus/(Deficit) for this Phase of Work (B - C) 35,974.76 D COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM – This report has been posted to the City’s website with the agenda in advance of the council / committee meeting. PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION OF THIS MATTER: Not applicable ACKNOWLEDGED BY: Dan Chapman, Deputy CAO & City Treasurer, Finance and Corporate Services 1.iv. - 4