Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFCS-16-146 - 2016 Debt Issue Revision REPORT TO: Council DATE OF MEETING: September 12, 2016 SUBMITTED BY: Ryan Hagey, Director of Financial Planning 519-741-2200 x 7353 PREPARED BY: Ryan Hagey, Director of Financial Planning 519-741-2200 x 7353 WARD(S) INVOLVED: All DATE OF REPORT: September 1, 2016 REPORT NO.: FCS-16-146 SUBJECT: 2016 Debt Issue Revision ___________________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION: That “Urban Forest - $256,000” be removed from the list of items identified for 2016 debenture financing, as approved at the January 18, 2016 special Council meeting and be replaced with “KOF Maintenance - $200,000” and “Activa Twin Pads - $56,000” BACKGROUND: As part of the annual budget process, Council approves a list of capital projects to be financed through issuing debt. As a lower-tier municipality, the City of Kitchener is precluded from issuing debt on its own and instead must issue debt through its upper- tier municipality (the Region of Waterloo). To qualify for debt financing, a project must be capital in nature and have an expected lifespan longer than the term of the debt. REPORT: The Region of Waterloo has been informed by outside legal counsel that Kitchener’s Urban Forest project does not qualify for debt financing as planting trees is not considered by them to be a capital activity. Instead, Kitchener needs to substitute other qualifying capital expenses. Staff have identified two other projects that qualify and can be substituted for the Urban Forest project. 1. KOF Maintenance – HVAC and exterior lighting upgrades 2. Activa Twin Pads – HVAC upgrades Substituting projects has no impact on the overall budget approved by Council. The $256,000 of debt financing is required to deliver the capital budget approved by Council. *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. 1. - 1 ALIGNMENT WITH CITY OF KITCHENER STRATEGIC PLAN: The recommendation of this report supports the achievement of the city’s strategic vision through the delivery of core service. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: None. The recommendation simply changes which projects for which the City is issuing debt. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM – This report has been posted to the City’s website with the agenda in advance of the council / committee meeting. PREVIOUS CONSIDERATION OF THIS MATTER: Original approval for issuing debt was given as part of 2016 Final Budget Day (report FCS-16-002 on January 18, 2016). ACKNOWLEDGED BY: Dan Chapman, Deputy CAO (Finance and Corporate Services) 1. - 2