Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFCS-17-029 - 2016 Year-End Variance Report REPORT TO: Committee of the Whole DATE OF MEETING: March 20, 2017 SUBMITTED BY: Ryan Hagey, Director of Financial Planning 519-741-2200 Ext 7353 PREPARED BY: Debra Fagerdahl, Manager of Financial Planning 519-741-2200 Ext 7114 WARD(S) INVOLVED: All DATE OF REPORT: March 7, 2017 REPORT NO.: FCS-17-029 SUBJECT: 2016 Year-End Variance Report ______________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION: For information. BACKGROUND: This is the third and final report to Council regarding the City’s financial performance versus the 2016 budget. The report and attached schedules include information regarding: · Tax supported services · Rate supported enterprises/utilities, and · Supplementary information related to investment income Variance reports take four to six weeks to prepare once the books are closed, and are forwarded to the next available meeting cycle (either Finance and Corporate Services Committee, or Committee of the Whole). In this case, December books were closed in mid-February and the variance report is being forwarded to Committee of the Whole in mid-March. REPORT: The City’s 2016 overall results were better than budgeted, coming within 2% of budget. Tax supported operations were slightly lower than projected at Final Budget Day, while Enterprises as a whole were somewhat higher than projected. The major contributors to the overall net positive variance in the City were the Gas utility, the Building enterprise, and Tax supported operations. Year-end positions for all City operations are summarized below. *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. 11. - 1 2016 Summary Results ($000's) Two examples are provided below to assist in interpreting the 2016 Summary Results table. · The first line of the table shows Tax Supported Operations ended the year with a surplus of $941,000 on budgeted expenses of $169,229,000, which equates to a variance of 0.6% of total expenses. · The bottom line of the table shows Total City Operations ended the year with a surplus of $6,346,000 on budgeted expenses of $383,336,000, which equates to a variance of 1.7% of total expenses. Additional details about tax supported operations and each of the enterprises are provided in the balance of the report. Operating Fund – Tax Base (Schedule 1) The City ended the year with an operating surplus of $941,000 in tax supported operations, and is the second consecutive year that tax-supported operations have yielded a surplus. The surplus equates to a 0.6% positive variance from the operating expenditure budget of $169M and was transferred to the Tax Stabilization Reserve Fund, which ended the year with a balance of nearly $2.4M. While this is a positive trend for tax supported operations, the reserve balance is still well below its minimum target balance of $5.6M. Significant variances (over $200,000) are summarized below. Additional comments identifying the primary factor contributing to variances that exceed $50,000 and/or 10% of the budget are included in Schedule 1. 11. - 2 Significant Variances (over $200,000) Community Services Department: · By-law Enforcement - Parking/Noise had a surplus of $308,000 due to increased fines from the Ministry of Transportation as a result of their increased collection fee. It is unknown if this revenue stream will be on-going. Infrastructure Services Department: · Engineering - Administration had a surplus of $405,000 largely due to increased engineering sub-division review revenues which are volatile and can vary from year to year. · Operations - Sidewalk Repairs had a deficit of $209,000 because of more repairs performed during a longer work season. · Operations - Sportsfields, Trails & Parks had a deficit of $269,000 due to a longer season and an overage in the water budget. General Expenses: · Gapping had a deficit of $558,000 due to actual staffing costs being close to budget. General Revenue: · Payments in Lieu (PIL) had a surplus of $522,000 due to retroactive Municipal Property Assessment Corporation (MPAC) assessments on the Strasburg Road Transit Facility, the Women's Correctional Facility, the Kitchener Operations Facility, and the Kitchener Public Library Main Branch parking lot. · Investment Income had a surplus of $606,000 due to higher than anticipated rates as a result of the Canadian economy outperforming expectations which transpired to GIC rates remaining unchanged while the City’s budget had assumed a rate reduction based on forecasts at the time. 11. - 3 Building Enterprise (Schedule 2) 2016 Summary Results ($000's) The Building Enterprise had a surplus of $2.4M which was better than the budgeted surplus of $148,000. The positive variance was largely due to higher than expected activity in most sectors and the rush for permits in the last quarter as customers applied before the expected increase to Region of Waterloo development charges on January 1, 2017. Golf Courses (Schedule 3) 2016 Summary Results ($000's) The Golf Enterprise was on budget. Parking Enterprise (Schedule 4) 2016 Summary Results ($000's) The Parking Enterprise was on budget. Water Utility (Schedule 5) 2016 Summary Results ($000's) The Water Utility had a surplus of $567,000, which was better than the budgeted surplus of $418,000. The variance was due to higher than expected bulk water sales combined with lower than budgeted staff costs. These savings were offset by lower water revenue due to reduced consumption. 11. - 4 Sanitary Sewer Utility (Schedule 6) 2016 Summary Results ($000's) The Sanitary Sewer Utility had a surplus of $679,000 which was better than the budgeted surplus of $411,000. The variance was due to maintenance savings as staff was reallocated to the Storm Sewer Utility. These savings were offset by lower than budgeted sewer surcharge revenue which is consistent with the Water Utility. Storm Sewer Utility (Schedule 7) 2016 Summary Results ($000's) The Storm Sewer Utility had a deficit of $304,000 which fell short of the expected surplus of $206,000. Storm sewer maintenance costs due to increased repairs and the City’s environmental insurance deductible of $100,000 related to the Grand River oil spill largely contributed to the unfavourable variance. Gas Utility (Schedule 8) 2016 Summary Results ($000's) Gas Utility - Overall the Gas Utility has a deficit of $1.6M, which was better than the budgeted deficit of $4.9M. Revenues in all gas companies were under budget due to less than anticipated consumption as a result of the milder temperatures. The variances outlined below were anticipated when preparing, and are incorporated into the rate recommendations brought forward by staff in report INS-16-061 Natural Gas Rates. Gas Delivery had a deficit of $106,000 which fell short of the budgeted surplus of $616,000. Contributing to the negative variance was lower than expected gas revenues due to lower volumes. Offsetting the negative variance was the lower than budget maintenance costs and the surplus realized in Other Programs which had a surplus of $1.1M. This positive variance was primarily due to rental water heaters performing better than expected combined with savings from staff vacancies and efficiencies. 11. - 5 Gas Supply had a deficit of $741,000 which is better than the budgeted deficit of $5.7M. This was largely due to the price of gas being lower than budgeted, but was offset by lower consumption due to the warm weather during 2016. This positive variance is what allowed a supply rate reduction in 2017 (versus the previously expected increase). Gas Transportation had deficit of $778,000 which was worse than the budgeted surplus of $200,000. This was largely due to lower than expected gas transportation revenues due to the lower volumes which is consistent throughout all Gas companies. Investment Report (Schedule 9) All investments made were in accordance with the City’s investment policy. Short term investment yields averaged 1.47%, and average short term investment balances remain healthy. A surplus of $606,000 was realized due to the higher than anticipated rates as a result of the Canadian economy outperforming expectations leading to GIC rates to remain unchanged while analysts had expected a reduction. ALIGNMENT WITH CITY OF KITCHENER STRATEGIC PLAN: The recommendation of this report supports the achievement of the City's strategic vision through the delivery of core service. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Financial implications are discussed above and detailed in the attached schedules. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: Inform - This report has been posted publicly as part of the agenda to inform the public. ACKNOWLEDGED BY: Dan Chapman, Deputy CAO (Finance and Corporate Services) 11. - 6 7 - 11. 8 - 11. 9 - 11. 10 - 11. 11 - 11. 12 - 11. 13 - 11. 14 - 11. 15 - 11. 16 - 11. 17 - 11. 18 - 11. Schedule 9 Page 1 * includes average balance in the overnight bank account This graph compares the yields for:1)City investments2)Interest rate for City bank account with CIBC 19 - 11. Schedule 9 Page 2 Average Interest Rate 2016 = 1.47%Average Interest Rate 2015 = 1.47%