HomeMy WebLinkAboutHK - 2017-12-05 - Item 5 - Heritage Impact Assessment - 114-120 Victoria Street South (Former Huck Glove Factory)
October 2017
Assessment
Heritage Impact
17069 | 114-120 Victoria Street S
mccallumsatherpage ii
page iii
table of contents
...................................................................................................3
...........................................................................................................7
Table of ContentsExecutive Summary1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 Introduction .....................................................................................................11.2 Methodology
1.3 Contact Information ........................................................................................52.0 RESEARCH / ANALYSIS2.1 Context 2.2 Historical Occupancy and Evolution
............................................................112.3 Architectural Description ..............................................................................132.4 Existing
Conditions ......................................................................................152.5 Description of Cultural Heritage .............................................................
.....193.0 STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE 3.1 Description of Property .................................................................................233.2 Statement of Cultural Heritage
Value or Interest .........................................254.0 CONSERVATION APPROACH AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 Summary of Conservation Principles ...................................................
..........274.2 Proposed Development and Potential Heritage Impacts ...........................294.3 Considered Alternatives and Mitigation Strategies ......................................394.4
Recommendations .......................................................................................404.5 Process and Next Steps ................................................................
...............415.0 REFERENCES APPENDICES Heritage Personnel Heritage Experience
- heritage impact assessment
114-120 victoria street south
ed
ed cultural
cance of the subject
Ministry of Culture, Tourism and
The HIA assesses the potential impact
of the
cant to Kitcheners cultural heritage as a place of
nfo Sheet No. 5
Ontario Heritage Act.
publication Heritage Resources in the Land use Planning
of the
mccallumsatherpage iv
executive summary The purpose of the report is to evaluate the impact of the proposed development on 114-120 Victoria Street South, the site of the former Huck Glove Factory and to suggest
potential mitigation strategies to sensitively incorporate the original building into a new development. Due to the scale of the associated development, this Heritage Impact Assessment
will identify existing cultural heritage that meets the criteria for designation and address the new design, proposed impacts and mitigation strategies. In our research, both archival
and primary, we validated that the original building, industry. In this report, we reviewed the building to identify the features that would be recommended for designation. Once the
characteristics of the building's existing value has been established, design guidelines are recommended to meaningfully incorporate into an adaptive reuse project. This approach balances
the desire to respect history, with the need to address contemporary concerns such as sustainability, urban design, accessibility and compliance with the building code. cultural heritage
resources meet the criteria for heritage designation as per Regulation 9/06 heritage resources. As per I Sport Heritage Toolkit Process, potential negative impacts to cultural heritage
resources include but are not limited to:
ning
page v
executive summary
ning the overall heritage
1
rst formal step in the heritage process is to submit for Rezoning and Site Plan
value of the buildings such as the material and composition of existing facades in the industrial vernacular. street.building. It is recommended that the frontage on Victoria Street
South and Bramm Street, remain connected to the street. The side and rear setbacks and transitions be addressed relative to the nature of the proposed development. The clerestory separation
varies in setback with a height of approximately 900mm and the setback is 3m/1.8/.6 to zero. It is anticipated to use a light band to highlight this separation.as per Conservation
Principle 7 - Legibility. It is recommended that any new work be distinguishable from original fabric. elements of a cultural resource so as to retain its heritage value and extend
its physical life. This may involve preservation, rehabilitation, restoration, or a combination of these actions or processes", Parks Canadas Standard and Guidelines for the Conservation
of Historic Places in Canada, 2003.
Conserve Maintain sightlines to the adjacent heritage and note-worthy buildings on the New development should maintain an appropriate setback from the original Any new
building adjacent to the Huck Glove building should be contemporary Approval. As the project is reviewed by planning, heritage will have the opportunity to comment on the potential
impacts of the proposed development. Once high level relationships and principles have been established, the heritage team will work with the development team to provide a conservation
plan identifying the short, medium and long term projects for the Huck Glove building. When the conservation work has been completed and re-incorporated into a new development, designation
will be pursued.
cant heritage attributes or features;
cant views or vistas within, from, or of built
- heritage impact assessment
cance of the complex.
cant relationship; and
restore. integrity of the Huck Glove building. associations and meaning by making the property relevant and integrated with the community.
114-120 victoria street south
alteration that is not sympathetic, or is incompatible, with the historic fabric, appearance and context; shadows created that alter the appearance of a heritage attribute; isolation
of a heritage attribute from its surrounding environment, context, or a heritage resources.Measures to mitigate potential impacts consistent with recognized conservation principles
including the Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (Parks Canada) and the Eight Guiding Principles in the Conservation of Built Heritage Properties
(Ontario Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport) include: Maintain appropriate physical relationships and visual settings that contribute to Preserve the historic character of
the Huck Glove building, do not over repair or Respect the uniqueness of the building in its materials and detailing. Allow for new construction that relates to and conserves
the essential form and Provide for the participation of the people for whom the place has special
mccallumsatherpage vi
c
page 1
background
.
introduction
1.1
cance and heritage attributes of the building on the
es the impact of the proposed development on its status as
Ontario Heritage Act.
mcCallumSather was retained to guide and evaluate design during the development process. Prior to submission, both heritage and the design team worked together to form a strategy and
approach for the restoration and adaptation of the cultural resource on the site. Historical analysis, design recommendations and coordination are required to address both the existing
property and the resulting impact of the proposed alteration and construction following the City of Kitcheners planning requirements and the This report is created to evaluate the
impacts of the proposed design of adjacent buildings. Recommendations contained in this report are based on a thorough a cultural heritage resource. In the report, both conservation
and mitigation options are considered, where appropriate, in order to propose a development which appropriately conserves, adapts and adds to its existing cultural resources. The adaptation
strategy applies conservation principles balanced with new construction techniques to mitigate any potential negative impacts to both the original structure and decorative features.
A balanced approach to conservation and adaptation has guided the development design in all areas and will continue to do so in future phases. The adaptive reuse and detailed in future
design phases in order to inform decisions and direct the 114-120 Victoria Street South re-development throughout the process
- heritage impact assessment
114-120 victoria street south
mccallumsatherpage 2
page 3
background
ed by a community" or
ed in the 2014 Provincial Policy
cant?
methodology
cations, methodology of construction and
1.2
cance
cant built heritage resource which is "a building, struc-
cant or unique within the City?
to the understanding of a belief, person, activity, organization or institution that is ture, monument, installation or and manufactured remnant that contributes to cultural heritage
landscape of which industrial complexes and main streets are listed as examples. or conserve its cultural value?upgraded?
Does this property or structure have strong associations with and/ or contribute Conservation and Adaptation: If the questions regarding the design or physical value, contextual value
and integrity have indicated that the building is of interest, the following questions should also be answered regarding any future development: What physical or referential aspects
of the building are most crucial to maintain What is the structural condition of the building? What are the mechanical and electrical conditions? What services need to be
What are the opportunities to make the building more accessible to the public? The next stage of the project will include a conservation plan. It will explore the short, medium and
long term scope of work for the Huck Glove building and give the maintenance and monitoring strategy after the development is complete.
in
Ontario Heritage Act
c achievement?
under the
nish, craftsmanship/details noteworthy?
rst hand analysis of the site from all relevant
- heritage impact assessment
Ontario Regulation 9/06
or type?method of construction?merits of design, composition, craftsmanship or details? Does the structure street, neighbourhood or area? neighbourhood? landscaping or exterior features
that complete the site? features? Is this a notable structure due to sympathetic alterations that have taken place over time?
114-120 victoria street south
The research methodology gathers relevant data from the city archives (maps, photos, stakeholders and consultants. In doing so, we intend to shed light on the following questions as
outlined by Stage 1: Design or Physical Value Style: Is this a notable, rare or unique example of a particular architectural style Construction: Is this a notable, rare or unique
example of a particular material or Design: Is this a particularly attractive or unique structure because of the Contextual Value Continuity: Does this structure contribute
to the continuity or character of the Setting: Is the setting or orientation of the structure or landscaping noteworthy? Landmark: Is this a particularly important landmark
within the region, city or Completeness: Does this structure have other original outbuildings, notable Integrity Site: Does this structure occupy its original site? Alterations:
Does this building retain most of its original materials and design Condition: Is this building in good condition?
mccallumsatherpage 4
N2J 2H1
page 5
17 Laurel St
background
Waterloo, ON
T. 519 884 271
F. 905.526.0906
T. 905.526.6700
157 Catharine St. N
Project Architects:
ABA Architects Inc
Hamilton, ON L8L 4S4
Waterloo, ON N2V 1C5
101 Randall Drive Unit B
Bolen Trussell Architecture
1.3 CONTACT INFORMATION
Heritage Architect: mcCallumSather
Drew Hauser (drewh@mccallumsather.com)
Christina Karney (christinak@mccallumsather.com)
contact information
1.3
- heritage impact assessment
114-120 victoria street south
PROPOSED SITE:114-120 Victoria St S.(Huck Glove Factory)
City of Kitchener, PARTS Central Plan 2016.
Source:
mccallumsatherpage 6
Built Heritage Resource
page 7
architecture
cially designated a
context
2.1
ict ensued as the city was forced to confront its cultural
rst buildings were built; and over the next decade, several families
Kitchener's history dates back to 1784, when the land was given to the Six Nations by the British as a gift for their allegiance during the American Revolution. From 1796 and 1798, the
Six Nations sold 38,000 hectares of this land to a Loyalist, Col. Richard Beasley.The portion of land Beasley purchased was remote but it was of great interest to German Mennonite farming
families from Pennsylvania,. They wanted to live in an area that would allow them to practise their beliefs without persecution.Eventually, the Mennonites purchased all of Beasley's
unsold land, creating 160 farm moved north to what was then known as the Sand Hills. One of those families, arriving in 1807, was the Schneiders, whose restored 1816 home - the oldest
building in the city - is now a downtown museum.In 1816, the Government of Upper Canada designated the settlement the Township of Waterloo. Much of the land, made up of moraines and
swampland interspersed with rivers and streams, was converted to farmland and roads.Immigration to the town increased considerably from 1816 until the 1870s - many of the newcomers
being of German (particularly Mennonite) extraction. In 1833, the area was renamed Berlin; and in 1853 Berlin became the County Seat of the newly created County of Waterloo, elevating
it to the status of village. The extension of the Grand Trunk Railway from Sarnia to Toronto - and hence through Berlin - in July 1856 was a major boon to the community, helping to
improve city. However, with the outbreak of the First World War in 1914 came anti-German distinctiveness.
- heritage impact assessment
114-120 victoria street south
PROPOSED SITE:114-120 Victoria St S.(Huck Glove Factory)
Source: City of Kitchener, Staff Report, Heritage Best Practices
mccallumsatherpage 8
Warehouse District
page 9
architecture
. Limited trees and long views along the track
table and source of high paying jobs that created an
oors and large windows, these structures combine an evolution from
CHL Study Staff Report
ned in the
North America, the evolution of large department stores, such as Eaton's, Simpson's, Sears and others arose directly from the large-scale transport of goods by train as manufactured
in centres such as Kitchener. Many of the original warehouse and factory buildings remain in the Warehouse District of Downtown Kitchener, bordering the rail line as it slices through
the centre of the community. At least seven of the factory complexes shown on the 1911 plan of Kitchener remain in the Breithaupt and Victoria corridor including the former Dominion
Tire Company, Krug Furniture (still operational), the Kaufman Rubber Company, the Lang Tanning Company, the Rumpel Felt Co., the Huck Glove building and several others. It should be
noted that the Kaufman Rubber Company building was designed by Albert Kahn (1869-1942) in 1908, the same year he designed the Highland Park Ford Plant for Henry Ford. It was in this
plant that Henry Ford produced the Model T -car and perfected the concept of mass production. Kahn designed more than 1,000 buildings for the Ford Motor Company and became known as
the architect of the industrial era. The Kaufman Building and the concentration of other typically multistoried structures, is distinct and perhaps the most prominent of the cultural
landscapes in the city as corridor make this area highly visible from adjacent streets. Consistent in overall all brick construction through to concrete and steel dating from the late
19th century to the mid-20th. Interestingly, the workers lived in houses close to the factories who were able to walk to work in a manner that is the envy of most modern commuters.
The quality of these mostly brick residential neighbourhoods also tells a compelling economy where workers could live and work in grace and comfort.
re
- heritage impact assessment
114-120 victoria street south
There was pressure for the city to change its name from Berlin; and in 1916 - following much debate and controversy - the name of the city was changed to Kitchener after Herbert Kitchener,
1st Earl Kitchener, who died that year while serving as the Secretary of State for War of the United Kingdom.Warehouse District Kitchener was a centre of industrial growth in Canada
at the turn of the 20th century. It caused a rapid increase in population such that whole districts in the City were developed within a very short time frame between 1900 and 1920.
The population grew in the two years between 1911 and 1913 from just over 15,000 to over 19,000 as a result of the development of the industrial economy.halls and commercial enterprises.
In most of the world, industrial cities arose from the availability of power and transportation. In the 18th century, population growth was linked to industrial areas through access
to waterways which were used to generate power and water transport. Kitchener was different, not having direct access to a river or lake system, but instead used 'rivers' made of iron,
in the form of the convergence of rail lines (Grand Trunk became operational in 1856) which allowed raw materials to be transported in and fabricated materials to be exported. Using
products from the farmland surrounding the community, many of the manufactured items included clothing in the form of cloth and leather products. Furnishings made from the extensive
old growth forests to the north and west and equipment fabricated for farming were included in the production. Rail brought coal to power the industries which connected the factories
with locations across North America and products were made by the boxcar and sometimes by the trainload. Large buildings constructed for manufacturing products and even larger warehouses
were built to store products for bulk train shipments. Shipments, in most cases, went to giant retail stores in major centres and were distributed across the continent to the order
of anyone with access to the telegraph and the retail company's catalogue. In
Source: City of Kitchener Archives - Fire Insurance Maps for 120 Victoria Street South.
mccallumsatherpage 10
Fire Insurance Map (1908-1925)Fire Insurance Map (1908-1947)
rst
page 11
architecture
rm went on to
rm of Brown & Erb on King Street West,
rm moved in 1937 to Kitchener.
Miller-Lang company for a period of time operated out of the Hagen building on Victoria Street until the building was taken over by the Huck Glove Company in 1937.in 1880, in the Town
of Berlin making furniture and kid gloves. After Erbs death in become the Huck Glove Company. A building located at 122-123 Victoria Street South and built by the Hagen Shirt & Collar
Company, was occupied by the Huck The historic and associative values relate to the original owner, the Hagen Shirt and Collar Co.; a previous owner, the Lang Shirt Co.; and, the present
owner, Huck Glove Group Company. The building was built by Henry A. Hagen who was the founder of the Hagen Shirt and Collar Co. The company was incorporated in 1906 and manufactured
the Hagen brand of shirts, collars, and cuffs. The Huck Glove Company traces its origins to 1880, when Menno Erb went into partnership with C.F. Brown. They operated a tannery and manufactured
mattresses. In 1889 they built a factory on King Street to make buckskin, calf and kid gloves and fur mitts. In 1906, after Mr. Erb's death, a foreman, Joseph Huck bought the glove
business and established the Huck Glove Co. Ltd. The company moved to the building at 120 Victoria Street South around 1937. In the year 2000, Huck Glove Group Company Limited had an
operation size of 32,000 square feet. It employed twenty-two (22) people, manufactured leather gloves and mitts, being distributors of PVC, nitrile, neoprene, kevlar, cotton knit,
vinyl, and latex. aid and safety products, still operational from Victoria Street South in Kitchener. Still located on Victoria Street South in the City of Kitchener, the building
is currently vacant is owned by 114-120 Victoria Street South Inc.
tted
rm started making
rst company to manufacture
- heritage impact assessment
rst real bid in the shirt business when in 1910, it purchased the
historical occupancy and evolution
114-120 victoria street south
Henry A. Hagen learned the shirt cutting trade from Horace Messett while working for the Messett Shirt Company in the Town of Berlin. In 1891, Henry Hagen, Henry S. Boehmer and his
son A. O. Boehmer bought the assets of a shirt company that Horace Messett had operated in Galt. Henry Hagen owned the machinery and moved it from Galt to Berlin where the three men
formed the Berlin Shirt & Collar Company. Henry was manager and put in charge of the manufacture of shirts. During this period the company manufactured shirts on a jobbing basis for
Aaron Erb, who owned a small shirts for the Forsyth family.Henry Hagen established the Hagen Shirt & Collar Company sometime in the early 1900s. It was located in the heart of Berlins
business district. In 1906, Henry built a building at 122-130 Wilmot (Victoria) Street, after selling his interest in the Berlin Shirt & Collar Company to John Lang who operated the
Lang Shirt Company. After Mr. Langs death, the company became the Miller-Lang Shirt Company. Hagens building with all modern equipment of the period. In 1906, the company was incorporated
to form the Hagen Shirt & Collar Company Limited, manufacturing Hagen brand high shirts for John Forsyth exclusively. In 1907, Henry A. Hagen went into the shoe store business with
A. Sippel under the name of Sippel & Hagen. By 1908, the Hagen Shirt & Collar Company Limiteds trade had been extended west as far as the Yukon. The Hagen companys equipment and
went on to establish John Forsyth Limited. The
2.2
mccallumsatherpage 12
page 13
architecture
re alarm systems.
cation and insulation may be required.
re code upgrades may be required such
nished with plaster - interior partitions are
repair, in particular around new metal details at base which show signs of spalling and cracking. that the original windows would have been double hung with wood frames. Existing windows
are mostly intact, but it is recommended that they be replaced for better performance as well as for heritage aesthetics. clad with painted wood. conditions. A new system may be required
depending on new proposed use.updates depending on new programme / use. elevator could provide access from the street level to level 1.
Structure, Brick Masonry: Currently in fair condition, but requires some Roof Assembly: Appears to be in good condition. Door and Windows: Windows and doors are not original. It
is suspected Heating / Air Conditioning: Building is conditioned to maintain current Electrical / Plumbing: Building is currently serviced but may require Barrier Free: Building
is currently not accessible from the street. A new Review if hazardous material abatement is required.
Envelope Systems Code Compliance 120 Victoria Street S. which includes the Huck Glove building has been recently vacated. A preliminary review was undertaken on August 3, 2017 to assess
current conditions from visual observations. More detailed condition assessments will be undertaken as the building is rehabilitated and would be produced in conjunction with a Conservation
Plan.
architectural visual description
2.3
- heritage impact assessment
114-120 victoria street south
Source: City of Kitchener, Staff Report, Heritage Best Practices
3
August 3,
Cement based mortar (chip out and replace)
Locations of Spalling brick to be replaced, selective repointing
13
Source: Elevation Drawings by mcCallumSather based on photos taken 2017 and measurements from the Topographic Survey by ACI Surveyors, September 201
Original lime based mortar
2
1
2
Rust Stain Locations of Spalling brick to be replaced
mccallumsatherpage 14
Original Brick Facade at parapet. Original Brick Facade at foundation wall
page 15
architecture
ected in the
oor assemblies, and
cations for the aforementioned items to ensure good
existing conditions
2.4
ashing details; and
foundations. heritage practices in implementation.
Recently occupied, the building fabric and interiors have been kept in good condition. The current owners have continued to monitor and heat the building. As the devel-opment of the
site moves forward, assessment of the buildings will be an ongoing process, involving the lead architect, structural, mechanical and electrical engineers and the heritage consultant.
Proposed repairs, to conserve the exterior of the building include: Selective cleaning of brick at areas of damage; Selective re-pointing of deteriorated masonry joints; Repair
of roof; Window replacement; Restore exterior signage Other areas under review: Structural review of how to support any additions. The Conservation Plan for the Huck Glove
building will address the technical, aesthetic repair and scope of work presented in the building permit application.
- heritage impact assessment
114-120 victoria street south
mccallumsatherpage 16
page 17
August 3,
architecture
Source: Elevation Drawings by mcCallumSather based on photos taken 2017 and measurements from the Topographic Survey by ACI Surveyors, September 201
- heritage impact assessment
114-120 victoria street south
Source: Map by mcCallum Sather using google map and PARTS Central Plan 2016.
S
t
S
a
i
r
o
t
c
i
V
10
7
8
9
t
S
h
p
5
e
s
o
J
2
4
1
S
t
t
S
S
3
a
i
m
r
o
m
t
a
c
r
i
B
V
6
t
S
k
r
a
P
mccallumsatherpage 18
Legend Listed Properties Part IV Designation Part IV Designation (district) Non- Designated building of interest2.5.1 120 Victoria Street S (subject Site - non designated building
of interest)2.5.2 127 Victoria Street S 2.5.3 130 Victoria Street S2.5.4 131 Victoria Street S2.5.5 72 Victoria St. Street S 2.5.6 Kaufman House * 2.5.7 113-151 Charles St. W
(The Tannery Complex) 2.5.8 Victoria Park District 2.5.9 195 Joseph St 2.5.10 Kaufman Lofts * Project under review
uences
page 19
architecture
uences from the Ukrainian Baroque architectural style. The
guration)
Figure 4: 131 Victoria Street South (Ukrainian Catholic Church of the 131 Victoria Street South is a early 20th century building built in the vernacular building is situated on a 0.22
acre parcel of land located on the east side of Victoria Street South between Theresa Street and Michael Street in the Victoria Park Planning Community of the City of Kitchener within
the Region of Waterloo. The principal resource that contributes to the heritage value is the church building. 131 Victoria Street South is recognized for its design, physical, historical
and associative from the Ukrainian Baroque architectural style. The building is in good condition with many intact original elements. The building features: hipped gable roof; red brick
construction; date stone that reads "1926"; large semi-circular windows with brick voussoirs; round window with stained glass; semi-circular door with concrete surround; and, pear-shaped
dome.Figure 5: 72 Victoria Street South 72 Victoria Street South is an early 20th century building built in the IndustrialVernacular architectural style. The building is situated on
a 0.85 acre parcel of land located on the west side of Victoria Street South between Joseph St. and Arthur Pl. in the City Commercial Core Planning Community of the City of Kitchener
within the Region of Waterloo. The principal resource that contributes to the heritage value is the industrial building. Similar to the Huck Glove building, 72 Victoria Street South
also is characterized by its rectangular plan, brick construction, bays separated by shallow buttressing, segmentally arched window openings with brick voussoirs, and stone sills.Figure
6: 621 King Street West (Kaufman House)621 King Street West is a two-and-a-half storey late 19th century brick building built in the Victorian Gothic architectural style. The building
is situated on a 1.83 acre parcel
description of cultural heritage
2.5
e Shoe
e to manufacture ladies
- heritage impact assessment
e was an active member of the Waterloo County Health Association,
114-120 victoria street south
Figure 2: 127 Victoria Street South 127 Victoria Street South is a two storey early 20th century building built in the IndustrialVernacular architectural style. The building is situated
on a 0.85 acre parcel of land located on the east side of Victoria Street South between Michael Street and Oak Street in the City Commercial Core Planning Community of the City of Kitchener
within the Region of Waterloo. The principal resource that contributes to the heritage value is the industrial building.The design and physical values relate to the Industrial Vernacular
architectural style that is in good condition with many intact original elements. The building features: rectangular plan; red brick construction; chimney; decorative cornice; shallow
buttressing between windows; concrete headers and sills; and, large window openings with triple 6/6 hung windows. The historic and associative values relate to the original shoes. The
13,000 square foot plant underwent expansion in 1918 when the building footprint increased by 50%. The company operated for 53 years until its closing in the Lodge, Rotary and St.
John's Anglican Church. Washerama bought the building in 1978 and continues to operate at this location.Figure 3: 130 Victoria Street South 130 Victoria Street South is a mid 20th century
institutional building built in the Art Deco architectural style. The building is situated on a 0.15 acre parcel of land located on the west side of Victoria Street South between Bramm
Street and Park Street in the Cherry Hill Planning Community of the City of Kitchener within the Region of Waterloo. The principal resource that contributes to the heritage value is
the drive in dry cleaners building.
ll additions throughout the
oor of all buildings; the demolition of the one storey
rst major industry in Berlin and it became the largest
nishes demonstrate the functional and industrial history of the
cant alterations and additions between 1917 and 1925. The Tannery
of land located on the south side of King Street West between Wellington Street South and Victoria Street South in the K-W Hospital Planning Community of the City of Kitchener within
the Region of Waterloo. The principal resource that contributes to the heritage value is the two-and-a-half storey late 19th century brick building.The building is a rare example of
the Victorian Gothic architectural style. The building is in good condition with many intact original elements. The original building is constructed with tooled red sandstone, which
was a rare building material in Berlin. The building features elements such as an 1897 date stone carved with ostrich feathers motif; carved stone detailing on corners feature ostrich
feathers and a lion with wings; a turret with octagonal slate roof; a slate roof with decoration; wood dentil mouldings; stained glass windows; double hung windows; and a chimney.Figure
7: 113-151 Charles St. W., 170-188 Joseph St., 3-44 Francis St. S (The Tannery Complex) The Lang Tanning Company was founded in 1848 by Reinhold Lang. The Lang family members were prominent
local industrialists whose cultural and political leadership established Berlin as an important urban centre of industrial activity in southern sole leather producer in the British
Empire. The Tannery is comprised of a complex of interconnected buildings on the block bounded by Charles, Francis, Joseph and Victoria streets. The majority of the buildings were constructed
between 1896 and buildings are good examples of vernacular industrial architecture. Simple brick complex. The rehabilitation of the Tannery involved: the repointing of deteriorated
masonry joints; the replacement of deteriorated bricks; roof repairs; the repair of existing windows on the buildings located on Francis Street and the installation of new windows of
complementary design on all other buildings; the installation of new building at the corner of Charles Street and Victoria Street; the selective demolition
2468
10
page 20
mccallumsather
13579
page 21
architecture
ng and natural lighting (hence the name
cant in the history of industrial building design, providing
cant architecturally and is representative of the history of industrial
rm the Trussed Concrete Steel Company, patented a system for building
site. The result is rehabilitation and adaptive reuse project that has brought new life to the Tannery. Figure 10: 410 King Street East (Kaufman Footwear)The Kaufman Footwear building
located at 410 King Street West is an excellent example of early industrial modernist architecture, and of the work of one of the 20th Centurys greatest industrial architects, Albert
Kahn (1869-1942). Built over a period of 17 years in phases dating 1908, 1911, 1920 and 1925; the building is representative of the evolving construction methods of the era and of the
changes in industrial production, including the organization of work, greater attention to the welfare of the workforce and the dramatic growth of industries at the turn of the century.During
the latter part of the 19th Century, the design and appearance of factories changed from the basic mill construction or construction with iron and steel, to factories designed using
reinforced concrete frames. It would be Albert Kahns brother Julius, who reinforced concrete bars, known as the Kahn System. This new method of construction daylight factory
given to describe this style of industrial building).The Kaufman Footwear building embodies many of Kahns design philosophies. Together, the four building phases maintain a unity of
style and scale, and the massing of the 1908- 1925 complex provides a powerful focus in its setting within the Downtown. architecture in Canada.
- heritage impact assessment
114-120 victoria street south
mccallumsatherpage 22
Site Survey
page 23
architecture
description of property
3.1
The subject property municipally addressed 114-120 Victoria Street South, in Kitchener, contains a c.1907 former factory building (120 Victoria St. S.) in the Industrial Vernacular style.
The building is situated on a 0.95 acre parcel of land, located on the West side of Victoria Street South between Bramm Street and Joseph Street. The building is still in use and is
operating as an industrial use building. The building is rectangular in plan and was made of yellow brick construction. The windows, which are segmentally arched with brick voussoirs,
and stone sills, are equally sized and spaced. The structural bays of the building are separated by shallow buttressing. A one-storey addition was added to the West side of the building,
date unknown.
- heritage impact assessment
114-120 victoria street south
2
(TYP)
3
(TYP)
1
(TYP)
6
(TYP)
5
(TYP)
4
mccallumsather page 24
Heritage Attributes
cance
page 25
ce and laundry; second
oor - cutting and operating. The Huck
ine;
that the building was owned by the Lang Shirt Co. Limited and the building was used Glove Company traces its origins to 1880, when Menno Erb went into partnership with C.F. Brown. They
operated a tannery and manufactured mattresses. In 1889 they built a factory on King Street to make buckskin, calf and kid gloves and fur mitts. In 1906, after Mr. Erb's death, a forman,
Joseph Huck bought the glove business and established the Huck Glove Co. Ltd. The company moved to the building at 120 Victoria Street South around 1937. Today the company is known
as Huck Glove Groopco Ltd. and two third generation family members are involved with the business: Robert Huck, President and Bob Huck, Controller. The company continues to operate
out of the building at 120 Victoria Street South.DESCRIPTION OF RECOMMENDED HERITAGE ATTRIBUTES - EXTERIORThe heritage value of 120 Victoria Street South resides in the following heritage
attributes: All elements related to the construction and Industrial Vernacular architectural style of the building, including:2. Rectangular plan;3. Yellow brick construction;4. Bays
separated by shallow buttressing;5. Segmentally arched window openings with brick voussoirs; and,6. Stone sills.
ed
statement of cultural value or interest
3.2
es the Reasons to Designate
Ontario Heritage Act
under the
- heritage impact assessment
Ontario Regulation 9/06
114-120 victoria street south
The building at 120 Victoria St. S. is noted in on the City of Kitchener Staff Reports as a Non-Designated Property of Cultural Heritage Value or InterestUsing DESCRIPTION OF HISTORIC
PLACE 120 Victoria Street South is a three storey early 20th century building built in the Industrial Vernacular architectural style. The building is situated on a 0.95 acre parcel
of land located on the west side of Victoria Street South between Bramm Street and Joseph Street in the City Commercial Core Planning Community of the City of Kitchener within the Region
of Waterloo. The principal resource that contributes to the heritage value is the industrial building.HERITAGE VALUE 120 Victoria Street South is recognized for its design, physical,
historical and associative values.The design and physical values relate to the Industrial Vernacular architectural style that is in good condition with many intact original elements.
The building features: rectangular plan; yellow brick construction; four bays on the Victoria Street elevation separated by shallow buttressing; segmentally arched window openings with
brick voussoirs; and, stone sills. Until 2009, the front and side elevation of the building featured sign banding that read "The Huck Glove Co. Ltd.".The historic and associative values
relate to the original owner, the Hagen Shirt and Collar Co.; a previous owner, the Lang Shirt Co.; and, the present owner, The Huck Glove Co. Ltd. The building was built by Henry A.
Hagen who was the founder of the Hagen Shirt and Collar Co. The company was incorporated in 1906 and manufactured the Hagen brand of shirts, collars, and cuffs. The 1924-25 Fire Insurance
Map indicates
4. RESPECT FOR ORIGINAL FABRIC:Repair with like materials.Repair to return the resource to its prior condition, without altering its integrity.5. RESPECT FOR THE BUILDING'S HISTORY:Do
not restore to one period at the expense of another period.Do not destroy later additions to a house solely to restore to a single time period.6. REVERSIBILITY:Alterations should be
able to be returned to original con-ditions. This conserves earlier building design and tech-nique.e.g. When a new door opening is put into a stone wall, the original stones are numbered,
removed and stored, allow-ing for future restoration.7. LEGIBILITY:New work should be distinguishable from old.Buildings should be recognized as products of their own time, and new
additions should not blur the distinction between old and new.8. MAINTENANCE:With continuous care, future restoration will not be nec-essary.With regular upkeep, major conservation
projects and their high costs can be avoided.
nishes, except where absolutely necessary.
b
Eight Guiding Principles in the Conservation of Historic Properties The following guiding principles are ministry statements in the conservation of historic properties and are based
on international charters which have been established over the century. These principles provide the basis for all deci-sions concerning good practice in architectural conserva-tion
around the world. Principles explain the "why" of every conservation activity and apply to all heritage prop-erties and their surroundings.1. RESPECT FOR DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE:Do not
base restoration on conjecture.Conservation work should be based on historic documen-tation such as historic photographs, drawings and physical evidence.2. RESPECT FOR THE ORIGINAL
LOCATION:Do not move buildings unless there is no other means to save them.Site is an integral component of a building. Change in site diminishes heritage value considerably.3. RESPECT
FOR HISTORIC MATERIAL:Repair/conserve - rather than replace building materials and Minimal intervention maintains the historical content of the resource.
Conservation Principles The following guidelines are taken from the Ontario Ministry of Culture Architectural Conservation Notes:
mccallumsather page 26
page 27
ning the overall heritage
conservation approach and recommendations
cance of the complex;
1
cant typology of industrial architecture;
integrity of the Huck Glove building; associations and meaning by making the property relevant and integrated with the community;value of the buildings such as the material and composition
of existing facades in the industrial vernacular. street.building. It is recommended that the frontage on Victoria Street South and Bramm Street, remain connected to the street. The
side and rear setbacks and transitions be addressed relative to the nature of the proposed development. The clerestory separation varies in setback with a height of approximately 900mm
and the setback is 3m/1.8/.6 to zero. It is anticipated to use a light band to highlight this separation.as per Conservation Principle 7 - Legibility 1. We would recommend that any
new work be distinguishable from original fabric.
Maintain appropriate physical relationships and visual settings that contribute to Preserve the historic character of 120 Victoria St S, do not over repair or restore.; Respect
the Huck Glove building in its materials and detailing as they relate to a Allow for new construction that relates to and conserves the essential form and Provide for the participation
of the people for whom the place has special Conserve Maintain sightlines to the adjacent heritage and note-worthing buildings on the New development should maintain an appropriate
setback from the original Any new building adjacent to the Huck Glove Building should be contemporary
summary of conservation principles
4.1
Ontario Regulation
cally address the cultural
es the principles from which
cance of Section 3.2.
- heritage impact assessment
Ontario Heritage Act,
under the
114-120 victoria street south
In order to protect the heritage resources of the 120 Victoria Street South, the following heritage value and heritage attributes based on design, historic, and contextual criteria Through
our analysis and application of the criteria as outlined by 9/06 the exterior and some interior features of the Huck Glove building that we recommend be retained and conserved:
Original Huck Glove building
Legend Source: Bolen Trussel Architecture - Site PlanBolen Trussel Architecture & ABA Architects - South Elevation
mccallumsather page 28
Site Plan: Building 'A'
ce
ed
page 29
ce space in
conservation approach and recommendations
ce building consists of the expansion and adaptive re-use of
Description of Development The Proposed Development is a mixed-use development on a property at the corner of Victoria Street South and Bramm Street in Kitchener. The proposed development
forms part of a broader comprehensive development together with the recently approved, and under construction, One Hundred Victoria project. The Proposed building located along Victoria
Street South and incorporating the existing original 1907 Huck Glove building, and a 25-storey mixed retail and residential tower behind the 6-storey building toward the rear of the
site. The mixed use residential building draws on the design features of the 100 Victoria design. The curved glazed wall element weaves in and around the podiums brick cladding system
to extend the undulating streetscape and enhance the pedestrian realm. The brick cladding system makes reference back to the industrial brick buildings within the district while still
maintaining a distinct and contemporary identity. The tower complements the neighbouring buildings with a brick and window wall façade featuring a strong architectural projection element.
This element provides both functional screen walls for the building as well as integrates the tower rooftop mechanical equipment into the façade. an existing 3 storey brick and beam
building at the corner of Victoria Street & Bramm Street in downtown Kitchener. The proposed expansion above and adjacent to the the Region. It will also offer a contemporary spin
on downtown Kitcheners well known brick and beam warehouse spaces. By preserving the existing character of the site and infusing it with state of the art new building systems and
amenities, this facility will become an iconic destination for business growth and urban revitalization.
Proposed Building 'A'
Proposed Building 'B'
- heritage impact assessment
proposed development and potential heritage impacts
4.1
114-120 victoria street south
South Elevation - Master PlanMaterial Precedents
Source: Bolen Trussel Architecture - Elevations
note: location of proposed new entrance.
mccallumsather page 30
Huck Glove in Proposed Development
page 31
ect the original intent of factory light. In
ect a different proportion to building the
conservation approach and recommendations
ective of heritage industrial materials.
oors is recommended.
The commercial addition proposes tinted glass to create a consistent texture with adjacent precast to further juxtapose between old and new components. The glass of general the smaller
mass of the remaining Huck Glove building will remain warm and textural, true to its industrial heritage, while the addition will be tightly clad to evoke a cool modern aesthetic. Within
the extent of the original building, the original structure will be maintained, however will require some areas of structural reinforcement due to the proposed additional loads. While
the design of the interiors has not been complete, maintaining Building B:The proposed curve of the podium base relates to other towers adjacent to the site. The connection height
is similar to the Huck Glove factory. The tower language is in contrast to the heritage asset framing it on all sides. Use of new yellow brick is obvious, distinct factory, it is
scaled and provides private and public amenity.On a large scale, the proposed towers are clad with glass and precast, similar to the approved tower materials on the adjacent property.
The running bond brick pattern picks up on the local vernacular without a patina differentiating old/new; corrugated Potential Heritage Impacts To determine the effect a development
or site alteration may have on a built heritage resource or cultural landscape the MTCS Heritage Resources in Land Use Planning Process outlines six potential direct or indirect impacts:
ed as
oor. On
oor has a 0.6
- heritage impact assessment
oors with frontage on both Bramm St and Victoria St S.
ce building that incorporates the original Huck Glove
114-120 victoria street south
The site includes two main buildings Building B: a 25 storey mixed use development with a podium and residential tower situated west on Bramm StA proportional relationship is created
between the elements through massing and setbacks; Building B is setback by approximately a third of the Huck Glove's width. Building A:At a high level, it is proposed that several
conservation measures be pursued to stabilize and celebrate the heritage of the Huck Glove building. Among repairs such as selective repointing, it is the intent to paint Huck Glove
back on the walls where it was part of the Conservation Plan. Access to the buildings have been addressed on both the east and south facades. On the east, public connections are created
through the glazed addition to the north of the west, terraced stairs provide a plaza experience that relates to the interior street and the mixed use building proposed to the west.
The proposed addition is setback from the front face of the existing building by stepback from the Victoria (east) edge. This is consistent along the east, south and west facades with
the exception of the rear entry. At the rear, where the building addition meets 120 Victoria along its north edge, there is clear glazing to allow for visual connection through the
site. It is the intent to use a high iron content glass for the base and street atrium to emphasize the public space and highlight the remaining heritage elements.
Source: Bolen Trussel Architecture - Views
mccallumsather page 32
Huck Glove in Proposed Development
page 33
ning
ned relationships
conservation approach and recommendations
element. If removed, former points of connection will be investigated to ensure that there is no damage to the brick. The areas to be investigated further are the following: Windows:
While the existing windows are not original, it is recommended that further investigation will be done around the window replacement as part of the conservation plan. Documentary
evidence has not been found of what these would have been, however given what was typical with this era of industrial construction, they were likely 2 over 2 single or double hung
wood windows. Windows should be selected to enhance the integrity of the existing envelope through water and air tightness and should be consistent with the industrial aesthetic
of the building. Impact of Proposed Alterations - Minimal Impact / Unknown at a high level only. What is evident from the provided imagery and plans, is that the Huck Glove building
has clearly set apart from its additions through strategic setbacks and a contrast of building materials and colour. It is recommended that analysis be conducted to understand the structural
impact to building on top of the original structure and how to strategically needle new structure in for reinforcement. Further analysis should also start along the north facade which
is imbedded within the new development and will be served by new elevators. Further analysis should be done with respect to details proposed for the existing envelope. Details for the
window replacement and proposed wall sections where insulation may be added to the walls or roof assembly should be reviewed for its impact to heritage.
ll formerly open spaces.
eld from open space to residential
cant heritage attributes or features;
- heritage impact assessment
that is not sympathetic or incompatible, with the historic fabric and
created that alter the appearance of a heritage attribute or change the
of a heritage attribute from its surrounding environment, context or
cant relationship;
appearanceviability of a natural features; or
A change in land use
DestructionIsolation
114-120 victoria street south
Alteration Shadows These impacts are described in the next section and how the proposed development of the site will impact the remaining Huck Glove to remain. Impact
of Destruction -Minimal Impact The proposed development shows that the original Huck Glove building will be retained and only non-original additions will be removed. In preparation
of future connections, there will be selective demolition of the following areas: Rear addition : if there any original openings they may be re-instated this will require further
investigation. It is the intent that the brick on the rear may be used for repair. North addition: not considered feasible to be retained as it impede the parking strategy below
grade and limits the ability to connect to the new build which has the least visual impact from behind the public streets. The brick would be salvaged for repairs that are required.
It would be documented for public record. Chimney: removed as it is no longer a functioning component. The brick would be salvaged for repairs that are required. Fire Escape:
The element may require removal depending on the ultimate design of
mccallumsather page 34
Huck Glove in Proposed Development
page 35
ed areas that can
conservation approach and recommendations
cance to the historic development of the site. The proposed
A thorough understanding of the existing conditions with modern building science is important to establish design principles that would not undermine the durability of existing materials.As
the plans develop, more detail will be provided as to how elements will be adapted in future phases of documentation and the Conservation plan (to be provided when applying for a building
permit). Shadow Impacts - No Impact According to the Sun Shadow study done by GSP (left), the proposed new buildings do no impact the existing Huck Glove building due to its south east
corner location of the site. All shadows resulting from the new development impact the conditions on the north side of the site only and do not impact the existing heritage except for
a portion of the north corner (and non public side) at 4pm and 6 pm on June 21st . Isolation Impacts - Minimal Impact The building has minimal isolation impacts considering it will
be maintained for employment use. It is currently surrounded by small commercial buildings and parking development strengthens connections through the provision of greater public space,
landscape and pedestrian connections. be developed to express the sites history. As the Huck Glove building is characterized by yellow brick, a connection / reference to this in the
material language could be incorporated in the public realm. The use of unit pavers, a potential seating area or other furnishings could be used to enrich and compliment new and existing
buildings . The
- heritage impact assessment
114-120 victoria street south
Source: GSP- Sun Shadow Study
Source: Bolen Trussel Architecture - Plans
* Fourth - Roof Plan are not shown (above the original building)Second Floor Plan
mccallumsather page 36
Concept Plans
P1 - Basement Ground Floor Plan Third Floor Plan
page 37
conservation approach and recommendations
lled space which is strategically located to Kitchener's downtown
re protection and sanitation.
pavers or similar is pulled inside the building to re-inforce to original exterior context of the project.Visual Impacts - Minimal Impact / Unknown It is clear from the proposed plans,
elevations and views that the setbacks appropriately enhance and maintain the street presence of the Huck Glove building. Change in Use Impacts - Minimal Employment use of the Huck
Glove building will be maintained in the proposed development. While the nature of employment has evolved from the early 1900s, Huck Glove will continue and surrounding residential
neighbourhoods. The building will be impacted by an increase of occupancy which will be addressed through the building code for matters relating to
- heritage impact assessment
114-120 victoria street south
cance.
nd that conserving the relocated
cant challenges - the owner of the new
ourish in its evolving context.
cult to stabilize. It may also be an option
This option presents challenges in terms of the long term sustainability of the asset. In this par-ticular case, the function and density as is has been proven to not be viable in this
location and may not be the most meaningful at this time. We would want to see new use that would help this This option is the most viable as it balances new development with retention
and appreciation of architectural and social heritage. It requires thoughtful design to address these unique challenges. Relocating and maintaining a heritage structure Huck Glove building
over the long term is not economically sustainable and could reduce its Preservation by documentation is the least desir-able option, but may be appropriate in cases where the structural
integrity of a building is poor and prohibitively expensive or technically where there is a large stock of other surviving, or more representative examples. The Huck Glove building
is characteristic of the industrial vernac-ular and is in good condition. Documentation would only be required for the original building.
cant visual and
cance.
cult and may require mitigation strategies to
Preservation is not a do nothing approach: to ensure that the building does not suffer from rapid deterioration, repairs must be carried out and monitored. Execution of a maintenance
program for a building of this scale may over the long term, prove costly and drain human resources. Adapting the building to new uses may still prove manage the impacts of shadow,
differences in scale, orientation and setback and architectural compatibility. This option would require ade-quate study and analysis. historical relationships between the Huck Glove
building and the local fabric and would remove the building from its geographic connections with the neighbourhood. Demolition would result in a tangible element of the architectural
heritage to be lost and would sever a historic and visual relationship between the Huck Glove building and other sites in the neighbourhood. Partial demolition has been pursued, but
to remove only a portion of the building that was not listed under the buildings
es the
principle of minimal intervention and has the highest probability for retaining all heritage attri-butes of the property. Rehabilitation and reuse can revitalize a historic place.
Not only are structures repaired and in some areas, restored when adapted, they are regularly maintained and protect, and the heri-tage attributes are understood, recognized and celebrated.
This option would retain the Huck Glove in its current form and reinstate it to a surrounding that gives it prominence and offers it long term protection. Through a detailed investigation,
the construc-tion, architecture and history of the Huck Glove would be better understood and could be used for a comparative study. Its importance would survive as documentary records
accessible to the public through various means.
ce with the more recent additions
mccallumsather page 38
Development Options
OptionAdvantages Disadvantages Comment 1. Preserve and maintain as is: maintain use as 2. Incorporate the Huck Glove building into a new construction and rehabilitate it for compat-ible
new uses 3. Relocate and rehabilitate for compatible new uses 4. Preserve by record and commemorate: docu-ment the Huck Glove building through written notes, measured drawings, photographic
records, then demolish. The building may then be commemorated through interpretive signage or displays.
Figure 1: Conservation Options Chart
page 39
cance of the Huck Glove building
conservation approach and recommendations
the City of Kitchener;the process which allows the public to understand the role of this building as it has evolved over its history;which will ultimately result in its long term protection
through designation at the end of the process; and
The option that best balances the economic vitality and the long term sustainability of the Huck Glove with intact heritage attributes, and the one that also minimally impacts the heritage
attributes is Option 2, which will incorporate the Huck Glove into a new development and rehabilitate it with compatible new uses. This Option allows the development team to: Sustainably
conserve a tangible example of the Huck Glove building's role within Provide detailed documentation of the buildings current condition as a result of Retain the Huck Glove building
within its geographic and historic setting. The Huck Glove building is characteristic of the industrial style and a landmark which has been well maintained. It has positioned itself
well to be adaptively reused and revitalized within this larger development, which has provided an improved pedestrian experience and opportunities to strengthen relations with the
surrounding neighbourhood.
ce
ed four conservation
considered alternatives - mitigation strategies
4.3
- heritage impact assessment
in its existing form. compatible uses; written notes, measured drawings and photographic records, then demolish. The building may then be commemorated through interpretive signage or
displays.
114-120 victoria street south
There is no single, correct way to mitigate the impacts of new construction on historic structures. Best practices for heritage conservation generally attempts minimal intervention,
that is, maintaining the building in as close to the condition it was encountered. In reality, however, economic, and/ or technical site considerations may require an alternate method
to conserve the cultural heritage value of a structure or property.options outlined in Figure 1 which are: 2. Incorporate the Huck Glove into a new construction and rehabilitate it
for 3. Relocate and rehabilitate for new comparative uses, and; 4. Preserve by record and commemorate: document the Huck Glove building through
ner
ed features
Warehouse District (L-COM-1 in CHL
ce space and maintaining some of the
cant as it relates to the
ed that the Huck Glove building has been maintained with all of its
ning elements intact. The setbacks to other buildings in this development
and its historic and associative value with its former owners including: the
recommendations
mccallumsather page 40
4.4 We have reviewed the conditions of the buildings on the proposed development site and have concluded that the physical, contextual and historic value of the building should be conserved
for future use and recommend that designation be pursued at such as rectangular plan, yellow brick construction, four bays on the Victoria Street elevation separated by shallow buttressing,
segmentally arched window openings with brick voussoirs, and, stone sills are essential to its character. We also see the building Appendix 6) Hagan Shirt and Collar Co, the Lang Shirt
Co. and the Huck Glove Co. Ltd. help to distinguish old from new and provide opportunities for further connection and interaction public space and a new accessible entrance. original
interior allurements. This would describe in more detail the impact of any alterations such as window replacements, proposed connections to new additions horizontally or vertically,
and any changes that could occur on the interior layouts to accommodate new programme. A maintenance and monitoring plan should be completed as part of the Conservation Plan to ensure
the long term sustainability of this asset. Details of the Next Steps are outlined in the following section.
page 41
ndings and
ndings from this
conservation approach and recommendations
ed portions of project that relate to the retained
process and next steps
4.5
Short Term: HIA Phase 1& Documentation. -CURRENT As part of the short term conservation work, the development team has completed documentation including measured drawings, photographs
and reports. We anticipate we will present the proposed design and impacts to the Heritage Advisory Committee (Date TBD). The recommendation to designate will occur once all the renovations
of this development have been completed. Medium Term: Conservation Plan Phase 1, Demolition Submittals - FUTUREOnce the project has received comments and is at a stage where the architecture
can be developed, mcCallumSather will coordinate with the design team to provide guidance on methods of conservation in the form of a Conservation Plan. This will include any proposed
demolition, repairs, structural reinforcement and connections that will come as a result of the proposed conversions and additions. Long Term: Field Review and Monitoring (Plan for
Designation and Post Occupancy)Once building permits have been granted and site work is proposed (for demolition and construction) mcCallumSather will review the conditions and note
any repairs that work will help inform both the design work and long term requirements for monitoring and maintenance. Once the development has been approved and constructed, we recommend
that the heritage asset. Phase 3 of the Conservation Plan will outline the requirements post occupancy for monitoring and maintenance over its lifetime.
- heritage impact assessment
114-120 victoria street south
Through meetings with City of Kitchener Heritage Planners, we have outlined the next steps that are recommended to respond to the evolving concerns of heritage throughout the process
of development. Given the nature and scope of the project, a phased approach to the Heritage Impact Assessment and the Conservation Plan is recommended.
cance 120 Victoria Street North, 2009
5.0 REFERENCES City of Kitchener.
City of Kitchener, PARTS Central Plan 2016. Staff Report, Planning Around Rapid Transit Stations City of Kitchener, December 2, 2015. Staff Report, Heritage Best Practices CSD-15-19Government
of Ontario. 2006b. Ontario Regulation 9/06, Criteria for Determining Cultural Heritage Value or Interest, Under the Ontario Heritage Act. Electronic Document: http://www.elaws.gov.on.ca/html/regs/en
glish/elaws_regs_060009_e.htmLast accessed August 2, 2017.Government of Ontario. 2006b. Ontario Heritage Act. Electronic Document: https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/90o18. Last accessed
August 2, 2017.Government of Ontario. 2006. Heritage Resources in the Land Use Planning Process, Cultural Heritage and Archaeology Policies of the Ontario Provincial Policy Statement,
2005.Government of Ontario. 2014. Provincial Policy Statement. Electronic Document: http://www.mah.gov.on.ca/AssetFactory.aspx?did=10463Last accessed August 2, 2017.ACI Survey Consultants.
November 11, 2014. Huck Original Building 3 Storey Brick No. 120 Victoria Street North ACI Survey Consultants. February 5, 2015. Topographic Survey Showing Part of Lot 553 Registered
Plan No. 378 City of Kitchener.
mccallumsather page 42
page 43
che Series, Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions,
Bolen Trussel Architects. October 10, 2017, Site Plan, Elevations, Floor Plans and ViewsABA Architects October 24, 2017, Master Site Plan Archives Busy Berlin 1947 Fire Insurance Plan,
Sheet 132
- heritage impact assessment
114-120 victoria street south