Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFCS-17-197 - External Audit Plan for Fiscal 2017 REPORT TO: Audit Committee DATE OF MEETING: December 11, 2017 SUBMITTED BY: Corina Tasker, Internal Auditor, 519-741-2200 ext. 7361 PREPARED BY: Corina Tasker, Internal Auditor, 519-741-2200 ext. 7361 WARD(S) INVOLVED: ALL DATE OF REPORT: December 1, 2017 REPORT NO.: FCS-17-013 SUBJECT: 2018 Internal Audit and Service Review Work Plan ___________________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION: That the 2018 Internal Audit work plan be approved as outlined in report FCS-17- 013 dated December 1, 2017. BACKGROUND: Under the Audit Committee terms of reference it is the Audit Committee’s responsibility to provide recommendations for areas of focus and types of audits as well as approve the annual internal audit work plan. The integrated service review work plan encompasses not only the work of Internal Audit but also that of other staff across the corporation with responsibility for service review work. By planning service review work corporately it ensures that there is no duplication of effort and that work is integrated across departments where required. This comprehensive approach also ensures that all service areas will be reviewed at some point over approximately a six year period. This report shows the 2018 integrated service review work plan as well as the Internal Audit work plan. Only the Internal Audit work plan requires Audit Committee approval. *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. 2 - 1 REPORT: Service Review Goal The Effective and Efficient City Services priority within the City’s Strategic Plan (2015 - 2018) places a priority on improving the design and delivery of city services, responsible stewardship of public funds and accountability, among other things. The overarching goal of service reviews is to protect the City’s assets and interests, which supports these priorities. This includes, but is not limited to, protecting the long term health of the organization, its financial and physical assets, its reputation, its ability to perform critical services and the safety and well-being of employees and citizens. The way that staff achieves this goal is through three main categories of review work: 1. Ensuring operations are efficient and effective as possible Are we doing the right things? Are we doing things in the right way? Are we making the best use of our limited resources? Are we meeting customer or citizen needs? 2. Ensuring controls are adequate to protect assets from loss Have risks been adequately identified and mitigated? Are there structures and processes in place to prevent or detect loss, theft, fraud? 3. Monitoring compliance with policy, procedures and legislation Has staff been adequately trained on what is expected of them? Are staff following the rules to ensure work is accurate, reliable, timely, efficient, effective, safe, and legal? Are staff putting the corporation at risk in any way through their actions or inactions? This review work is carried out by internal audit, along with staff in the City’s various departments, to review both internal and customer facing services using a variety of tools. These may include: Service delivery reviews Lean tools and techniques including process mapping and assessing adequacy of controls Time studies Value for money analysis Organizational structure review Review of workplace culture Risk assessments Policy review Compliance audits; and Physical inventory and cash counts 2 - 2 2018 Internal Audit Work Plan The 2018 internal audit work plan includes service reviews as well as controls audits and recurring internal audit activities. Audit Committee is asked to approve the 2018 Internal Audit work plan shown below as per the Audit Committee terms of reference. A description of the types of review is included in Appendix A. The service review portion of the work plan is typically composed of a combination of services chosen from the prioritized list of services and Council requests. This year neither of those factors has influenced the content of the work plan. This is because there is considerable work from the 2017 work plan which will carry over into 2018 and will consume resources in the first half of the year. This is due to two of the service improvement resources being temporarily assigned to other special projects, and the extra time that was required to perform the Lean process review of the Revenue division which was not originally factored into the work plan schedule. The CAO has also committed to conducting a development service review which will be supported by Internal Audit and the other city staff. The process review component of this service review will start in the second half of 2018 and will be a very complex and lengthy review. In addition to these known work plan items, there may be additional work required to perform organizational reviews at the division or section level in some areas following the larger corporate organizational review which will be completed early in 2018. As such, staff needs to maintain some capacity in the work plan for this potential work. Internal audit will continue to conduct the annual physical inventory, and any confidential investigations as required. Other small controls or compliance reviews could be done on an ad hoc basis as time permits such as regular cash, employee expenses or VISA card audits. The Council priorities for service reviews that were solicited during the September 2017 Audit Committee meeting can, however, be advanced in other ways outside of the internal audit or service review work plans. The following priorities were identified by Council: Special Events – workload, capacity Economic Development – workload, capacity, process Facility Planning – capital costing process INS Administration – organizational structure Parking Enterprise – technology utilization, revenue maximization The Economic Development division is recently under new leadership. As part of the new Executive Director’s initial activities, a review of division capacity and resourcing is 2 - 3 being done. This includes the Special Events section. Therefore, it is considered redundant to initiate a separate audit or service review at this time. Regarding the request for a review of facility planning, it is understood that Council was looking for a condition assessment of city facility assets as input into the business plan for next year. Due to the specialized skill set required for this work it is not possible to complete it with internal resources. Facilities Management is in the process of conducting a condition assessment of the top 3 building assets and there will be further work conducted through the Leisure Facilities Master Plan to evaluate facility renewal requirements. Concerns around the interim nature of the INS Administration team will be resolved through the corporate organizational review. Additional analysis related to the effectiveness and capacity of INS support services is being reviewed internally and therefore a separate internal audit is not required at this time. The Parking Enterprise has been exploring a number of new parking technologies throughout 2017 (listed below). Staff do not feel a separate review is required. A new Pay by Mobile parking application is planned to be implemented in early 2018 complementing the City’s existing surface parking lot pay & display ticket system. The Pay by Mobile parking app will provide customers the ability to pay for parking via their cell phones and will offer a greater user experience by offering the ability to extend parking space use remotely and on-line receipts for parking payments. The newly installed LED street lighting and associated narrowband smart control infrastructure platform provides the opportunity for potential applications that could result in significant operational and economic improvements including Smart Parking. This opportunity will be explored more fully as part of the Digital Kitchener Innovation lab. Smart Parking includes parking management systems such as parking displays and guidance systems that enable users to find convenient and available parking. A new night-time user rate is also planned to be offered before 2019 allowing residents in the downtown area the ability to park their vehicles overnight in secured parking garage facilities for a reduced monthly fee over the existing day time monthly fee. In summary, all of the areas of Council interest are being addressed in some form within the corporation. If staff have misinterpreted Council’s direction regarding these topics, further clarification can be provided during the Audit Committee meeting. However, there is a very limited amount of capacity available for new work in 2018. 2 - 4 Listed below is the proposed Internal Audit work plan: Audit Area Type of Review Notes Service Reviews Operations – Winter Comprehensive Review Carried over from 2017 Maintenance Fire – Administration Process (Lean), Capacity Carried over from 2017 By-law Enforcement – Workload, Capacity, Process Carried over from 2017 Property Standards (Lean) DevelopmentComprehensive Controls Audits SAP – User Profiles Separation of DutiesCarried over from 2017 Recurring Internal Audit Activity Physical Inventory Count verification Confidential Investigations As required 2018 Integrated Service Review Work Plan The 2018 integrated service review work plan is for information only. In addition to the service reviews from the internal audit work plan above, the following reviews are also included in the integrated service review work plan: Service Type of Review Resource(s) Benefits and Pensions Capacity, process (carried over FCS Administrationfrom 2017) Utilities Risk assessment (carried over INS from 2017) Use of Consultants Value for money (carried over INS from 2017) Volunteer Resources Capacity, process CSD Reporting All service reviews assigned to Internal Audit will be brought forward through the Audit Committee in audit status reports on a quarterly basis. All service reviews assigned to other resources will be brought forward through the Audit Committee in an annual summary report in conjunction with Internal Audit’s year in review report. The report will contain the status of the reviews and any major findings or recommendations but will be much smaller in scope and detail than the internal audit reports. If further explanation or detail is required by Council this can be provided upon request. Any reports which require a decision by Council will be brought forward to the appropriate committee with a detailed report.For example, if recommendations within the report indicate that a service should be discontinued, changed significantly or additional funding is required then it would be brought forward for Council approval. 2 - 5 ALIGNMENT WITH CITY OF KITCHENER STRATEGIC PLAN: This report supports the achievement of the city’s strategic vision through the delivery of core service. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: There are no financial implications related to this report. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM – This report has been posted to the City’s website with the agenda in advance of the council / committee meeting. ACKNOWLEDGED BY: Lesley McDonald, Acting Deputy CAO, Finance and Corporate Services 2 - 6 APPENDIX A: TYPES OF REVIEWS TypeofReviewDefinition CapacityAreviewoftheactualtransactionorworkvolume,theaverage timetocompleteeachtransactionandtheestimatedrequired resourcingcomparedtotheactualresourcing. ComplianceAtesttodetermineifstaffisfollowingallrules,regulationsand policiesassociatedwiththeservice. ComprehensiveAnallencompassingreviewofthedivisionorserviceincluding thingslikeprocessreview,organizationstructurereview,controls, compliance,riskassessment,servicedelivery,customer satisfaction,valueformoney,capacity,benchmarkingandany otheranalysisrequired. ControlsAnanalysisandtestofcontrolpointswithinaprocesstoensure thatfraudulentactivitycanbeeliminatedormitigated. CostanalysisAdetailedanalysisofdirectandoverheadcostsofaserviceand analysisofchargeoutratesifapplicable. CustomersatisfactionAreviewofcustomersatisfactionwithaserviceandwhere improvementscouldbemade. FollowupAnadditionalreviewofanytype,notsoonerthan1yearafterthe "___________"originalreviewinordertoassesstheimpactoftheoriginal recommendationsandproactivelyidentifyanynew/emerging risks. ProcessAnanalysisofhowaprocessisdoneandwhereefficiency& effectivenessimprovementscouldbemade,including considerationofallstakeholdersrelatedtotheprocess. RiskassessmentAnidentificationofallofthepossiblerisksthatcouldaffecta serviceincludingratingtheprobabilityandimpactoftheriskusing thecorporateriskmatrix. RoleclarificationClarification,documentation,andcommunicationofrolesand responsibilitiesofsimilarrolestoensurethereisnooverlapin duties. ServicedeliveryAreviewtodeterminetheoptimalmethodofdeliveringaservice includingexploringoptionsofcontractingoutornotdeliveringthe serviceatall. ValueformoneyAcomparisonofthefullyburdenedcostofprovidingaservice (includingalldirectcostsplusoverhead)comparedtothecostof obtainingtheservicefroma3rdparty. 2 - 7 PLAN AND WORK AUDIT REVIEW INTERNAL 013 17 FCS 2018SERVICE 2 - 8 efficient protect & procedures to źƓƷĻƩĻƭƷƭ Reviews policy, ğƓķ effective adequate with are ğƭƭĻƷƭ are Service of /źƷǤ͸ƭ loss operationscontrolscompliance ƷŷĻ from Goal legislation ƦƩƚƷĻĭƷ EnsuringEnsuringassetsEnsuringand ƚƷŷƩƚǒŭŷʹ••• 2 - 9 years based review on six the last review over of based corporate work for ofapprove date to Process created only reviewed and services priorities, plan allprogram plan Plan areas required budget work Council work service list, prioritize Work consistent Audit all to expense review Committee risk, Processon ServiceprioritizedprioritiesOngoing,EnsuresAuditInternal ••••• 2 - 10 other starting 2018 work of drive in review half may to: first currently due review into (not Process Development work over projects of Revenue new reviews special for Plan organization carrying add to level to 2018 complexity review of year reviews assigned Work corporate and Lean section half / of this of 2017 scope ResourcesLength second –– capacity plan)Largein SeveralOutcomedivisional No••• 2 - 11 ways: structure other process process in utilization, capacity costing ΑĭğƦğĭźƷǤͲ Priorities addressed be ΑƚƩŭğƓźǩğƷźƚƓğƌ ΑƷĻĭŷƓƚƌƚŭǤ ΑĭğƦźƷğƌ will ΑǞƚƩƉƌƚğķͲ Council Development maximization Enterprise Events Planning priorities Administration EconomicFacilityINS SpecialParkingrevenue Council••••• 2 - 12 Plan Capacity Work (Lean),(Lean),Capacity Review of 2) ProcessComprehensive Process of 1 approval: Audit (page your For MaintenanceComprehensive ΑtƩƚƦĻƩƷǤ Internal Α‘źƓƷĻƩ Reviews: Enforcement AreaType Α!ķƒźƓźƭƷƩğƷźƚƓ law 2018 Audit Service OperationsFireByStandardsDevelopment 2 - 13 Plan duties of Work Review of required 2) CountverificationAs of 2 approval: Audit (page your For Activity Internal Investigations profilesSeparation InternalAudit Audits: Inventory AreaType 2018 Α ƭĻƩ Audit Controls SAP Recurring PhysicalConfidential 2 - 14 Plan plus: plan Work work moneyINS capacityFCS ReviewResources for Audit of assessmentINS information Internal Review the your of all For Includes AdministrationProcess, Service Pensions and AreaType 2018 Service BenefitsUtilitiesRiskConsultantsValueVolunteerResourcesCapacity,processCSD 2 - 15