HomeMy WebLinkAboutCSD-18-005 - FN 2018-001 - 197 Simeon StREPORT TO: Committee of Adjustment
DATE OF MEETING: January 16, 2018
SUBMITTED BY: Juliane von Westerholt, Senior Planner - 519-741-2200 ext. 7157
PREPARED BY: Eric Schneider, Technical Assistant – 519-741-2200 ext. 7843
WARD: 10
DATE OF REPORT: January 9, 2018
REPORT #: CSD-18-005
SUBJECT: FN2018-001 – 197 Simeon Street
Applicant – Carolyn Vander Schaaf
Approve with Conditions
RECOMMENDATION
That application FN2018-001 requesting permission to legalize an existing wood fence
having a height of 2.2m to be located 0.5m from the lot line abutting Cameron Street
rather than the required 4.5m; and, to be located within the Driveway Visibility Triangle
(DVT) whereas the By-law does not permit encroachments into the DVT be approved
subject to the following conditions:
1. That the wooden fence boards obstructing visibility within the DVT are removed,
creating openings for visibility as per the elevation drawings submitted within this
application. This measure shall be completed by April 30th, 2018.
2. That the openings in the fence detailed in Condition 1 be maintained in perpetuity,
otherwise this decision becomes null and void.
Location Map: 197 Simeon Street
*** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. ***
Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance.
REPORT
Planning Comments:
rd
, 2018. The subject
City Planning staff conducted a site inspection of the property on January 3
property located at 197 Simeon Street is zoned Residential Four (R-4) in the Zoning By-law and
is being used as a single detached dwelling.
The applicant is requesting permission to legalize an existing 2.2 metre high wooden fence
located 0.5 metres from the exterior lot line whereas the By-law requires a setback of 4.5 metres
(Section 630.5.1c). The applicant is also requesting permission to allow the fence to be located
within the driveway visibility triangle (DVT) (Section 630.5.1d).
rd
View of Fence from Cameron Street (Site Visit January 3 2018)
In considering the requested variance to the Fence By-law, Planning staff offers the following
comments:
The proposed variance meets the intent of the Fence By-law for the following reasons. The intent
of the regulation that requires fences with a height between 1.82 and 2.44 metres to be set back
4.5 metres from the property line is to preserve street aesthetics and to provide an adequate buffer
for the pedestrian realm. After completing a site visit, Planning staff is of the opinion that the subject
fence does not have a negative effect on street aesthetics, nor does it have a negative effect on the
pedestrian realm. In addition to the 0.5 metre setback to the property line, there is an additional 1.2
metres between the property line and sidewalk. Staff believes that the resulting 1.7 metre distance
between the fence and the sidewalk sufficiently provides an adequate buffer space.
View of Fence in Relation to the Sidewalk
The intent of the regulation that prohibits fences within the driveway visibility triangle (DVT) is to
ensure that visibility is maintained when a vehicle is exiting the driveway. To rectify this issue, the
applicant is proposing to create openings in the fence by removing wooden boards in the area that
would block visibility within the DVT to allow for clear, unobstructed visibility. These proposed
openings are depicted in the diagrams below that were submitted by the applicant. Transportation
Services has reviewed the diagrams of the proposed openings and is in support of this proposed
solution.
FA
Diagram of Proposed Openings for Visibility
Based on the foregoing, Planning staff recommends that this application be approved subject
to the conditions outlined below in the Recommendation section of this report.
Building Comments:
The Building Division has no objections to the proposed variance
Transportation Services Comments:
Based on the submitted plans with the application, the proposed openings within the existing
fence are acceptable in creating visibility and must be maintained at all times.
Heritage Planning Comments:
Heritage Planning staff has no concerns with the proposed variances.
The Kitchener Cultural Heritage Landscape Study (CHLS) dated December 2014 and prepared
by The Landplan Collaborative Ltd. was approved by Council in 2015. The CHLS serves to
establish an inventory. The CHLS was the first step of a phased cultural heritage landscape
(CHL) conservation process. The owner of the property municipally addressed as 197 Simeon
Street is advised that the property is located within the Pandora Neighbourhood CHL. The
owner and the public will be consulted as the City considers listing CHLs on the Municipal
Heritage Register, identifying CHLs in the Official Plan and preparing action plans for each CHL
with specific conservation options. Please contact Michelle Drake, Senior Heritage & Policy
Planner, for more information.
Environmental Planning Comments:
No environmental planning concerns.
Eric Schneider, BES Juliane von Westerholt, MCIP, RPP
Technical Assistant Senior Planner
Region of Waterloo
January 02, 2018
Holly Dyson
City of Kitchener
200 King Street West
P.O. Box 1118
Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7
Dear Ms. Dyson:
PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT
AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES
150 Frederick Street, 8th Floor
Kitchener ON N2G 4A Canada
Telephone: 519-575-4400
TTY: 519-575-4608
Fax: 519-575-4449
www. reg i o n ofwate r l o o. ca
File: T 15-40/VAR KIT GEN
(2) /06 Highland, McDonalds Restaurant
(6) /55, Roth, Ronald Lee
Re: Committee of Adjustment Meeting on January 16, 2018, City of Kitchener.
Regional staff have reviewed the following Committee of Adjustment application(s) and
have the following comments:
1. 197 Simeon Street (FN 2018-001): No concerns.
2. 431 Highland Road West (SG 2018-001): No concerns.
3. 3310 King Street East (A 2018-001): No concerns.
4. 375 Luella Street (A 2018-002): No concerns.
5. 197 Simeon Street (A 2018-003): No concerns.
6. 98-110 Victoria Street South (A 2018-004): No concerns.
Please be advised that any development on the subject lands is subject to the
provisions of the Regional Development Charge By-law 14-046 or any successor
thereof and may require payment of Regional Development Charges for these
development(s) prior to the issuance of a building permit.
The comments contained in this letter pertain to the Application number(s) listed. If a
site is subject to more than one application, additional comments may apply.
Please forward any decisions on the above mentioned Application number(s) to the
undersigned.
Yours Truly,
.::� ��. I 1__�
DOCS: 2598488
Joginder Bhatia
Transportation Planner
(519) 575-4757 ext 3867
Grand River Conservation Authority 400 Clyde Road, P.O. Box 729
Resource Management Division Cambridge, Ontario N1 R 5W6
Beth Brown, Supervisor of Resource Phone: (519) 621-2761 ext. 2307
Planning E-mail: bbrown@grandriver.ca
PLAN REVIEW REPORT: City of Kitchener
Holly Dyson
DATE: December 19, 2017 YOUR FILE: See below
GRCA FILE: N/A
RE: Applications for Fence:
FN 2018-001 197 Simeon Street
Applications for Signs:
SG 2018-001 431 Highland Drive West
Applications for Minor Variance:
A 2018-001 3310 King Street E
A 2018-002 375 Luella Street
A 2018-003 197 Simeon Street
Applications for Consent:
B 2018-001
301 Westmount Road
B 2018-002
67 Second Avenue
B 2018-003
268 Woolwich Street
B 2018-004
6 Pequegnat Avenue
GRCA COMMENT*:
The above noted applications are located outside the Grand River Conservation
Authority areas of interest. As such, we will not undertake a review of the applications
and plan review fees will not be required. If you have any questions, or require
additional information, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Beth Brown
Supervisor of Resource Planning
Grand River Conservation Authority
BB/dp
*These comments are respectfully submitted as advice and reflect resource concerns within the scope and mandate of the Page 1 of 1
Grand River Conservation Authority.