HomeMy WebLinkAboutCSD-18-053 - SG 2018-005 - 54 Queen St N1
Staff Report
KI
R Community Services Department www.kitchenerca
REPORT TO: Committee of Adjustment
DATE OF MEETING: March 20th, 2018
SUBMITTED BY: Juliane von Westerholt, Senior Planner - 519-741-2200 ext. 7157
PREPARED BY: Eric Schneider, Technical Assistant — 519-741-2200 ext. 7843
WARD: 10
DATE OF REPORT: March 13th, 2018
REPORT #: CSD -18-053
SUBJECT: SG2018-005 — 54 Queen Street North
Applicant — Glenn Stewart
Approve with Conditions
l ,
\R-5 �64u1
5/
�7
1-2
'tAnere.S
P_b,A r Ch,d,
` V
A= Gervemois Hmuse
/1 -AW Gnnl %�-
�Cs L �' C. -
W., De ..I6 \
zo
Location Map: 54 Queen Street North
RECOMMENDATION
That application SG2018-005 requesting permission to install a ground -supported sign
having an area of 4 sq.m. rather than the permitted maximum area of 3 sq.m.; to have a
clearance from grade of 0.9m rather than the required 2.44m when located within the
Corner Visibility Triangle (CVT); and, for a sign containing automatic changing copy to
be located within 3.8m of an intersection rather than the required setback of 23m be
approved, subject to the following conditions:
1. That a sign permit is obtained from the Planning Division by June 30th, 2018.
2. That messages displayed on the automatic changing copy portion of the sign
remain static for at least 6 seconds.
*** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. ***
Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance.
REPORT
Planning Comments:
The subject property located at 54 Queen Street North is zoned Community Institutional Zone (I-
2) in the Zoning By-law 85-1. Staff conducted a site inspection of the property on March 2nd
2018.
The applicant is requesting permission to construct a ground supported sign with a sign area of
4 square metres rather than the maximum permitted sign area of 3 square metres within an
institutional zone (Section 680.11.9), a clearance of 0.9 metres within the Corner Visibility
Triangle rather than the required minimum clearance of 2.44 metres (Section 680.11.14), and
for the sign to contain automatic changing copy located 3.8 metres from an intersection rather
than the required 23 metres (Section 680.3.29).
View of Proposed Sign Location and Intersection (Site Visit March 2nd, 2018)
The intent of the regulation that restricts sign area to 3 square metres within an institutional zone is
to ensure that signs located in an institutional zone are not excessively large and do not
dominate the streetscape as these properties are often within areas that are primarily
residential. The subject property is not located within a primarily residential area; rather it is
located at the intersection of a Regional Road (Weber Street) and a Major Community Collector
Street (Queen Street). Staff is of the opinion that the proposed sign with an area of 4 square
metres will not dominate the streetscape given the location of the property at a major
intersection. In addition, considering the height, size and scale of the building on the property,
Staff is of the opinion that the proposed sign is not excessively large.
The intent of the regulation that requires a 2.44 metre clearance for ground supported signs within
a Corner Visibility Triangle (CVT) is to ensure that visibility is maintained for pedestrians, cyclists
and automobile drivers. The building on site is located within the CVT and has existed in that
location for over 100 years. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed sign will not create any
additional obstruction to visibility as the building is already within the visibility triangle. Regional and
City of Kitchener Transportation Staff have reviewed the application and have no visibility concerns
for the location of the sign.
The intent of the regulation that requires 23 metres between signs containing automatic changing
copy and an intersection is to ensure that the sign does not cause a safety hazard by distracting
motorists travelling through the intersection. Staff is recommending a condition that requires the
messages on the sign to remain static for at least 6 seconds in order to mitigate any concerns of
distraction. In addition, Transportation Services has reviewed the application and has no objections
to the proposed objections to the proposed location of the sign.
Based on the foregoing, Planning staff recommends that this application be approved subject
to the conditions outlined in the Recommendation section of this report.
View of Proposed Sign Location (Site Visit March 2nd, 2018)
Building Comments:
The Building Division has no objections to the proposed sign variance. Note that a sign permit will
be required for the new sign.
-, 4
at
View of Proposed Sign Location (Site Visit March 2nd, 2018)
Building Comments:
The Building Division has no objections to the proposed sign variance. Note that a sign permit will
be required for the new sign.
Transportation Services Comments:
Transportation Services have no concerns with the proposed application.
Regional Comments:
No Concerns. The sign is on private property and should comply with City of Kitchener Sign By-
law.
Heritage Planning Comments:
The subject property municipally addressed as 54 Queen Street North is located within the Civic
Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District (CCNHCD) and designated under Part V
of the Ontario Heritage Act. The Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District
Plan provides policies and guidelines in regards to public landscape and infrastructure which
includes street and building signs. Changes to these elements can play a significant role in the
overall quality of the streetscape and character of the district. Heritage Planning staff note that a
heritage permit is not required as the proposed sign is a ground supported sign and is not
attached to the building. Although the CCNHCD plan encourages painted wood and metal as
signage material due to their historic use, Heritage Planning staff have noted that there are
precedents of fluorescent and changing copy signs within the Civic Centre Neighbourhood
Heritage Conservation District and for other heritage buildings. Considering this, Heritage
Planning staff have no concerns with the application.
Note that the subject property is located within the Civic Centre Secondary Plan. The City will be
commencing a secondary plan review in 2018. The land use and zoning of the property is
subject to change. For more information, please contact Tina Malone -Wright by phone (519-
741-2200 ext. 7765) or by email(tina.malonewright(a�kitchener.ca).
Eric Schneider, BES
Technical Assistant
Juliane von Westerholt, MCIP, RPP
Senior Planner
Region of Waterloo
March 06, 2018
Holly Dyson
City of Kitchener
200 King Street West
P.O. Box 1118
Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7
Dear Ms. Dyson:
PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT
AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES
150 Frederick Street, 8th Floor
Kitchener ON N2G 4A Canada
Telephone: 519-575-4400
TTY: 519-575-4608
Fax: 519-575-4449
www. reg i o n ofwate r l o o. ca
File: D20-20/
VAR KIT GEN
(3)/58 KIT, Bromberg, Garry, 1415 Huron Road
(5, 6)/53 Fairway, Fusion Homes
(7, 8) /VAR KIT, Freure North Subdivision
(10)/VAR KIT, Emmanuel Bible College
70-136 Fergus Avenue
Re: Committee of Adjustment Meeting on March 12, 2018, City of Kitchener.
Regional staff have reviewed the following Committee of Adjustment application(s) and
have the following comments:
1. 8 Bridge Street East (SG 2018-004): No concerns to the application. However,
the owner should be made aware that any redevelopment application for these
lands may require dedicated road widening up to 13.107 metres from Bridge
Street centreline. Therefore, it is strongly recommended that the sign be located
accordingly. Otherwise, an encroachment agreement with the Region; or actual
relocation of the sign would be required at the owner's cost, at such times in
future.
2. 54 Queen Street North (SG 2018-005): No concerns. The sign is on private
property and should comply with City of Kitchener Sign By-law.
3. 205 West Oak Trail (A 2018-022): No concerns.
4. 51 Simeon Street (A 2018-023): No concerns.
5. 2 Crossbridge Avenue (A 2018-024): No concerns.
6. 500 Rivertrail Avenue (A 2018-025): No concerns.
7. 70 Castlebay Street (A 2018-026): No concerns.
8. 150 Rockcliffe Drive (A 2018-027: No concerns.
9. 66 West Avenue (A 2018-028): No concerns.
10.110, 130 and 136 Fergus Avenue (A 2018-029): No concerns.
11.356-420 King Street West (A 2018-032): No concerns.
DOCS: 2670864
Please be advised that any development on the subject lands is subject to the
provisions of the Regional Development Charge By-law 14-046 or any successor
thereof and may require payment of Regional Development Charges for these
development(s) prior to the issuance of a building permit.
The comments contained in this letter pertain to the Application number(s) listed. If a
site is subject to more than one application, additional comments may apply.
Please forward any decisions on the above mentioned Application number(s) to the
undersigned.
Yours Truly,
Joginder Bhatia
Transportation Planner
(519) 575-4757 ext 3867
Grand River Conservation Authority
Resource Management Division
Trisha Hughes, Resource Planner
PLAN REVIEW REPORT: City of Kitchener
Holly Dyson
400 Clyde Road, P.O. Box 729
Cambridge, Ontario N1 R 5W6
Phone: (519) 621-2761 ext. 2319
E-mail: thug hes@grand river. ca
DATE: February 28, 2018 YOUR FILE: See below
RE Applications for Signs:
SG 2018-005 54 Queen Street North
Applications for Minor Variance:
A 2018-022
205 West Oak Trail
A 2018-023
51 Simeon Street
A 2018-024
2 Crossbridge Avenue
A 2018-025
500 Rivertrail Avenue
A 2018-026
70 Castlebay Street
A 2018-027
156 Rockcliffe Drive
A 2018-029
110, 130 & 136 Fergus Avenue
A 2018-032
356-400 King Street West
Applications for Consent:
B 2018-016 3 Chapel Hill Drive
B 2018-017 to 019 83 Elmsdale Drive
B 2018-020 334-400 King Street West
GRCA COMMENT*:
The above noted applications are located outside the Grand River Conservation Authority areas
of interest. As such, we will not undertake a review of the applications and plan review fees will
not be required. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please contact me.
Sincerely,
//V'fig
Trisha Hughes
Resource Planner
Grand River Conservation Authority
TH/dp
*These comments are respectfully submitted as advice and reflect resource concerns within dee scope and mandate of the Page 1 of 1
Grand River Conservation Authority.