HomeMy WebLinkAboutCSD-18-058 - A 2018-026 - 70 Castlebay StJ
Staff Report
KITCH��r,R Community Services Department www.kitchenerca
REPORT TO: Committee of Adjustment
DATE OF MEETING: March 20, 2018
SUBMITTED BY: Juliane von Westerholt, Senior Planner - 519-741-2200 ext. 7157
PREPARED BY: Siobhan Kelly Student Planner — 519-741-2200 ext.7074
WARD: 5
DATE OF REPORT: March 12, 2018
REPORT #: CSD -18-058
SUBJECT: A2018-026 — 70 Castlebay Street
Applicant — MHBC Planning Limited.
Approved
Location Map: 70 Castlebay Street
RECOMMENDATION
That Application A2018-026 requesting relief from Section 6.1.1.1 b) iv) of the Zoning By-
law to permit a driveway on a corner lot to be located 7.075 metres to the intersection
rather than the required 9.0 metres, be approved subject to the following conditions:
*** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. ***
Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance.
40
54
sz
Sa
84
sz
9n
1
"`R
ss
ss
Location Map: 70 Castlebay Street
RECOMMENDATION
That Application A2018-026 requesting relief from Section 6.1.1.1 b) iv) of the Zoning By-
law to permit a driveway on a corner lot to be located 7.075 metres to the intersection
rather than the required 9.0 metres, be approved subject to the following conditions:
*** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. ***
Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance.
That the owner shall enter into an agreement with the City of Kitchener to be
prepared by the City Solicitor and registered on title of the subject lands,
acknowledging that the driveway and driveway apron must be setback 1.5 metres
from the fire hydrant.
2. That the Owner obtains a building permit to the satisfaction of the Chief Building
Official.
REPORT
Planning Comments:
The subject property located at 70 Castlebay Street is zoned Residential Four (R-4) in the
Zoning By-law 85-1 and designated Low Rise Residential in the City's Official Plan. The subject
property is located at of the intersection of Castlebay Street and Renfrew Street and the
property currently contains no structures. The applicant is requesting relief from Section 6.1.1.1
b) iv) of the Zoning By-law for a driveway to be located 7.075 metres from the intersection of the
street lines abutting a lot for a single detached dwelling on a corner lot, whereas the By-law
requires 9.0 metres.
City Planning staff conducted a site inspection of the property on February 28, 2018,
70 Castlebay Street
70 Castlebay
et Proposed Driveway
In considering the four tests for minor variances as outlined in Section 45(1) of the Planning Act,
R.S.O., 1990 Chap. P. 13, as amended, Planning staff offer the following comments.
The subject property is designated Low Rise Residential in both the City's 2014 Official
Plan and 1994 Official Plan. The 2014 Official Plan Designation is in effect however, a
significant number of Low Rise Residential policies from the 2014 Official Plan are under
appeal and therefore, are not being relied upon for this report. Instead, Low Rise
Residential Policy 3.1.2.1 from the 1994 Official Plan which allows for low density forms of
housing such as single detached dwellings is being relied upon to determine whether the
proposed variance meets the general intent of the Official Plan. The proposed variance
meets the general intent of the designation, which encourages a range of different forms of
housing to achieve a low density neighbourhood. The requested variance to permit a
reduced driveway setback for a corner lot continues to maintain the low density character of
the property and surrounding neighbourhood. The proposed variance meets the general
intent to the Official Plan designation and it is the opinion of staff that the requested
variance is appropriate.
2. The Applicant has requested a variance to permit a driveway setback of 7.075 metres
rather than 9.0 metres from the intersection. The intent of the 9.0 metre driveway
separation requirement is to ensure pedestrian and vehicular safety. It is the opinion of
staff that the driveway separation requirement of the Zoning By-law was developed to
ensure that corner lots maintain appropriate visibility to and from an intersection so as to
ensure safe ingress/egress. The proposed driveway is located to lead directly to a street,
respects the minimum 0.6 metres setback to the side lot line, and maintains appropriate
DVT (4.57 metres) and CVT (7.5 meters). In addition, the proposed driveway apron has
been tapered to account for the required minimum clearance of 1.5 metre from the
existing fire hydrant. It is the opinion of staff, that the 1.925 metre reduction meets the
general intent of the By-law with respect to safety and visibility. Transportation Planning
staff has also indicated that they have no concerns with the requested reduction of 9.0
metres to 7.075 metres.
3. The variance is appropriate for the development and use of the land. The requested
variance should not impact the character of the surrounding neighbourhood. It is the
opinion of staff that the proposed 7.075 metre separation allows for sufficient separation
from the driveway and ensures that vehicles waiting to turn at a stop sign will not block the
driveway and drivers will have sufficient visibility to back out and turn onto the street. The
proposed variance is a result of the site's unique size and shape, which limits the
configuration of a driveway. Consequently, it is the opinion of staff that the proposed
variance will not impact the subject or adjacent properties.
4. The variance is minor for the following reasons. The proposed reduction would not
impact the functionality or visual appearance of the driveway since it would maintain: the
same width as the parking space, the corner visibility triangle, and driveway visibility
triangle. Additionally, the proposed driveway would continue to respect the character of
the neighbourhood and the surrounding corner properties as it provides the same width
as the attached garage and is located to lead to the municipally addressed street. It is
the opinion of staff that a 7.075 metre driveway setback from the intersecting street lines
would not impact access to the intersection for vehicular and pedestrian traffic and could
be appropriately applied to the dwelling without compromising safety in the
neighbourhood.
Based on the foregoing, Planning staff recommends that the application be approved subject to
the conditions outlined in the Recommendation section of this report.
Building Comments:
The Building Division has no objections to the proposed variance provided a building permit be
obtained for the single detached dwelling. Please contact the Building Division @ 519-741-2433
with permit requirements and any questions.
Transportation Services Comments:
For intersecting roadways classified as Local (Castlebay Street)/Local (Renfrew Street),
Transportation Services have no concerns with a 1.647 metre reduction from the required 9.0
metre intersection setback to a driveway, to provide an 7.353 metre setback.
Engineering Comments:
No concerns with the proposed application.
Operations Comments:
No concerns with the proposed application.
Environmental Planning Comments:
No concerns with the proposed application.
Heritage Planning Comments:
No concerns with the proposed application.
Juliane von Westerholt, MCIP, RPP
Senior Planner
Region of Waterloo
March 06, 2018
Holly Dyson
City of Kitchener
200 King Street West
P.O. Box 1118
Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7
Dear Ms. Dyson:
PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT
AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES
150 Frederick Street, 8th Floor
Kitchener ON N2G 4A Canada
Telephone: 519-575-4400
TTY: 519-575-4608
Fax: 519-575-4449
www. reg i o n ofwate r l o o. ca
File: D20-20/
VAR KIT GEN
(3)/58 KIT, Bromberg, Garry, 1415 Huron Road
(5, 6)/53 Fairway, Fusion Homes
(7, 8) /VAR KIT, Freure North Subdivision
(10)/VAR KIT, Emmanuel Bible College
70-136 Fergus Avenue
Re: Committee of Adjustment Meeting on March 12, 2018, City of Kitchener.
Regional staff have reviewed the following Committee of Adjustment application(s) and
have the following comments:
1. 8 Bridge Street East (SG 2018-004): No concerns to the application. However,
the owner should be made aware that any redevelopment application for these
lands may require dedicated road widening up to 13.107 metres from Bridge
Street centreline. Therefore, it is strongly recommended that the sign be located
accordingly. Otherwise, an encroachment agreement with the Region; or actual
relocation of the sign would be required at the owner's cost, at such times in
future.
2. 54 Queen Street North (SG 2018-005): No concerns. The sign is on private
property and should comply with City of Kitchener Sign By-law.
3. 205 West Oak Trail (A 2018-022): No concerns.
4. 51 Simeon Street (A 2018-023): No concerns.
5. 2 Crossbridge Avenue (A 2018-024): No concerns.
6. 500 Rivertrail Avenue (A 2018-025): No concerns.
7. 70 Castlebay Street (A 2018-026): No concerns.
8. 150 Rockcliffe Drive (A 2018-027: No concerns.
9. 66 West Avenue (A 2018-028): No concerns.
10.110, 130 and 136 Fergus Avenue (A 2018-029): No concerns.
11.356-420 King Street West (A 2018-032): No concerns.
DOCS: 2670864
Please be advised that any development on the subject lands is subject to the
provisions of the Regional Development Charge By-law 14-046 or any successor
thereof and may require payment of Regional Development Charges for these
development(s) prior to the issuance of a building permit.
The comments contained in this letter pertain to the Application number(s) listed. If a
site is subject to more than one application, additional comments may apply.
Please forward any decisions on the above mentioned Application number(s) to the
undersigned.
Yours Truly,
Joginder Bhatia
Transportation Planner
(519) 575-4757 ext 3867
Grand River Conservation Authority
Resource Management Division
Trisha Hughes, Resource Planner
PLAN REVIEW REPORT: City of Kitchener
Holly Dyson
400 Clyde Road, P.O. Box 729
Cambridge, Ontario N1 R 5W6
Phone: (519) 621-2761 ext. 2319
E-mail: thug hes@grand river. ca
DATE: February 28, 2018 YOUR FILE: See below
RE Applications for Signs:
SG 2018-005 54 Queen Street North
Applications for Minor Variance:
A 2018-022
205 West Oak Trail
A 2018-023
51 Simeon Street
A 2018-024
2 Crossbridge Avenue
A 2018-025
500 Rivertrail Avenue
A 2018-026
70 Castlebay Street
A 2018-027
156 Rockcliffe Drive
A 2018-029
110, 130 & 136 Fergus Avenue
A 2018-032
356-400 King Street West
Applications for Consent:
B 2018-016 3 Chapel Hill Drive
B 2018-017 to 019 83 Elmsdale Drive
B 2018-020 334-400 King Street West
GRCA COMMENT*:
The above noted applications are located outside the Grand River Conservation Authority areas
of interest. As such, we will not undertake a review of the applications and plan review fees will
not be required. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please contact me.
Sincerely,
//V'fig
Trisha Hughes
Resource Planner
Grand River Conservation Authority
TH/dp
*These comments are respectfully submitted as advice and reflect resource concerns within dee scope and mandate of the Page 1 of 1
Grand River Conservation Authority.