HomeMy WebLinkAboutDSD-18-132 - A 2018-107 - 624 King St WStaff Repod
Development Services Department
J
AZR
www.kitchener. ca
REPORT TO:
Committee of Adjustment
DATE OF MEETING:
October 16, 2018
SUBMITTED BY:
Juliane von Westerholt, Senior Planner - 519-741-2200 ext. 7157
PREPARED BY:
Lisa Thompson, Planning Technician — 519-741-2200 ext. 7847
WARD:
10
DATE OF REPORT:
October 2, 2018
REPORT #:
DSD -18-132
SUBJECT:
A2018-107 — 624 King Street West
Applicant — James Fryett, James Fryett Architect Inc.
Approve with Conditions
Streetview image of subject property
REPORT
Planning Comments:
The subject property is located at 624 King Street West at the corner of King Street West and Wellington
Street North. The property is zoned Mixed Use Two zone (MU -2) and is designated Mixed Use Corridor
in the K -W Hospital Neighbourhood Secondary Plan. The applicant is proposing to build a 6 -storey, 71 -
unit multiple dwelling on the property with an underground automated parking structure.
The Owner is presently in the site plan approval process for the proposed development and has also
previously received Committee of Adjustment Approval for a parking reduction for the development
(A2018-048) .
The owner has re-applied to the Committee of Adjustment to seek relief for an additional parking
regulation that was not identified in the original application, and a reduction in the percentage of visitor
parking required for a multiple dwelling.
*** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. ***
Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance
City Planning staff conducted a site inspection of the property on May 27, 2018. The site remains
vacant as site plan approval and a building permit have not been issued for the new development yet.
The applicant is requesting relief from the Zoning By-law for the following:
1. Relief from Section 6.1.1.2 d) to allow 90 -degree angle parking spaces to have a minimum length
of 5.2 metres rather than the required 5.5 metres; and
2. Relief from Section 6.1.2 b) vi) B) to provide 10% visitor parking for a multiple dwelling rather than
the required 20%. The 10% visitor parking is to be provided within the automated parking
structure.
In considering the four tests for minor variances as outlined in Section 45(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O.,
1990 Chap. P. 13, as amended, Planning staff offer the following comments.
1. The variances meet the general intent of the Official Plan as subject property is designated Mixed
Use Corridor in the K -W Hospital Neighbourhood Secondary Plan which permits multiple residential
uses and encourages intensive, transit supportive development. The proposed multiple dwelling is
permitted within the designation and is fully transit supportive being located on the LRT route and is
within walking distance to a station stop and the future multi -modal hub.
2. The variances meet the general intent of the Zoning By-law as the proposed multiple dwelling
conforms to the MU -2 zoning regulations. The zoning by-law parking regulations require 90 -degree
angle parking spaces to have a minimum width of 2.6 metres and a length of 5.5 metres to ensure
that vehicles can be adequately accommodated. The minimum parking stall dimensions were never
considered for a structured automated system. The vendor of the system has provided confirmation
that the interior dimensions of the "bays" within the system will be able accommodate the majority of
passenger vehicle models. The applicant has also been working with the vendor of the automated
parking structure to have the largest interior bay space for the vehicles. The modest reduction in
parking stall length in a controlled environment meets the intent of the zoning by-law. Additionally,
the reduction in visitor parking from 20% to 10% is in keeping with the general intent of the zoning
by-law as the proposed parking regulations to be implemented through the comprehensive zoning
by-law review will require visitor parking at the rate of 10%.
3. The variances are minor for the following reasons. Purchasers of units in the proposed building
will be aware of the automated parking structure and will have the choice to purchase a parking
space within the structure knowing what the size limitations are and have the opportunity of
utilizing the many modes of public transit in close proximity to the development. The reduction in
visitor parking to 10% is the future direction the City is proposing for all development and is
therefore minor to implement the rate now.
4. The variances are appropriate for the development and use of the land. The central location of the
development makes it appropriate to encourage the use of public transit and less reliance on the
personal motor vehicle. The TDM measures to be implemented in the design of the building are
also appropriate to help reduce the need for vehicle parking for both residents and visitors. The
automated parking structure will accommodate most models of passenger vehicles should the
residents of the building choose to purchase a space, and visitors will be able to utilize the spaces
within the automated structure as well.
Based on the foregoing, Planning staff recommends that this application be approved subject to the
conditions outlined below in the Recommendation section of this report.
*** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. ***
Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance
Building Comments:
No objections to the proposed variances.
Transportation Services Comments:
As the proposed parking system is a semi -automated parking system and cannot be customized for site
specific conditions, Transportation Services have no concerns with reducing the parking stall length from
5.5m to 5.2m. The width of the parking spaces should be at least 2.6m.
Considering the location of the proposed development, its proximity to the LRT and the proposed
Transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures such as user cost for parking and secure bicycle
parking spaces, Transportation Services have no concerns with reducing the required visitor parking
spaces from 20% to 10%.
Transportation Services have no concerns with providing the visitor parking spaces in the semi -
automated parking system subject to the following conditions:
• Visitor parking spaces should always be located on the ground floor;
• Clear reserved visitor signage should be provided for the visitor parking spaces;
• Large, wall mounted red & green lamps should be provided to indicate if the car is positioned on the
lift correctly. This feedback should also be provided by way of a buzzer;
• The presence and position of a vehicle should be measured with sensors;
• The parking garage should be entirely secured and should not be available for public access;
• All visitors must register their vehicle with property management / condo staff (via the resident they
are visiting). In event of a mis-parked car, property management / condo staff would know whose
car it is with their name, phone number and suite number for remediation; and,
• A functional plan showing the above measures should be prepared and submitted to the satisfaction
of the Director of Transportation Services. The Owner agrees to implement the details of the Visitor
Parking Functional Plan to the satisfaction of the Director of Transportation Services.
Engineering Comments:
No concerns with the proposed variances.
RECOMMENDATION
That application A2018-107 requesting relief from Section 6.1.1.2 d) to allow 90 -degree angle parking
spaces to have a minimum length of 5.2 metres rather than the required 5.5 metres; and relief from
Section 6.1.2 b) vi) B) to provide 10% visitor parking for a multiple dwelling rather than the required 20%
(the 10% visitor parking is to be provided within the automated parking structure) be approved subject
to the following conditions:
1. The owner shall receive final approval of Site Plan Application SP18/080/K/LT.
2. The owner shall submit a Visitor Parking Functional Plan addressing the visitor parking in the
automated structure and agrees to implement the details of the plan to the satisfaction of the Director
of Transportation Services.
Lisa Thompson, CPT
Planning Technician
Juliane von Westerholt, MCIP, RPP
Senior Planner
*** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. ***
Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance
Region of Waterloo
October 9, 2018
Holly Dyson
City of Kitchener
200 King Street West
P.O. Box 1118
Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7
Dear Ms. Dyson:
PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT
AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES
150 Frederick Street, 8th Floor
Kitchener ON N2G 4A Canada
Telephone: 519-575-4400
TTY: 519-575-4608
Fax: 519-575-4449
www. reg i o n ofwate r l o o. ca
File No.: D20-20/VAR KIT GEN
1, 4, 8, 9, 10
Re: Committee of Adjustment Meeting on October 16, 2018, City of Kitchener
Regional staff have reviewed the following Committee of Adjustment applications and
have no comments:
1.
SG 2018-010
— 505 Franklin Street North, Steve Roth (City of Kitchener)
2.
SG 2018-011
— 1700 Queens Boulevard, Steve Roth (City of Kitchener)
3.
SG 2018-012
— 22 Frederick Street, EuroPro GP Inc.
4.
A 2018-106
—
15 Tartan Avenue, Primeland Developments (2003) Limited
5.
A 2018-107
—
624 King Street West, Rahim Anwar
6.
A 2018-108
—
400 Bingemans Centre Drive, Summit Ltd.
7.
A 2018-109
—
1331 Countrystone Drive, Sunvest Development Corp.
8.
A 2018-110
—
97 Rivertrail Avenue, 25229365 Ontario Inc.
9.
A 2018-112
—
84 Mansion Street, Gary & Neda Cushing
10.
A 2018-113
—
56 Cameron Street North, Tony Rossel
11.
A 2018-114
—
227 Manitou Drive, Ali Rasoul
12.
A2018-115
—
1425 Block Line Road, NVU — Homer Watson Ltd.
Please be advised that any development on the subject lands is subject to the
provisions of the Regional Development Charge By-law 14-046 or any successor
thereof and may require payment of Regional Development Charges for these
developments prior to the issuance of a building permit.
The comments contained in this letter pertain to the Application numbers listed. If a site
is subject to more than one application, additional comments may apply.
Please forward any decisions on the above mentioned Application numbers to the
undersigned.
Document Number: 2839402
Yours Truly,
Jason Wigglesworth, C.E.T.
Transportation Planner
(519) 575-4835
Filing: 2 — VAR KIT — Kitchener, City of/Fire Station
3 — 06 FREDERICK GEN
5 — 15 KING KIT — Scherifali, Ahmet
6 — VAR KIT — Brick Brewing Co.
7 — 57 — Sunvest Development Corp.
11 — 69 — Rasoul, Ali
12 — 28 — Northview Apartment REIT
Grand River Conservation Authority
Resource Management Division
Andrew Herreman, Resource Planning
Technician
400 Clyde Road, P.O. Box 729
Cambridge, Ontario N 1 R 5W6
Phone: (519) 621-2761 ext. 2228
E-mail: aherreman@grandriver.ca
PLAN REVIEW REPORT: City of Kitchener
Holly Dyson
DATE
RE
October 4, 2018 YOUR FILE: See below
Applications for Minor Variance (Sign):
SG 2018-010 505 Franklin Street North/39 Midland Drive
SG 2018-011 1700 Queens Boulevard
SG 2018-012 22 Frederick Street
Applications for Minor Variance:
A 2018-104
387 King Street East
A 2018-106
15 Tartan Avenue
A 2018-107
624 King Street West
A 2018-108
400 Bingemans Centre Drive
A 2018-109
1331 Countrystone Drive
A 2018-110
97 Rivertrail Avenue
A 2018-112
84 Mansion Street
A 2018-113
56 Cameron Street North
A 2018-114
227 Manitou Drive
A 2018-115
1425 Block Line Road
Applications for Consent:
B 2018-116 357 King Street East
GRCA COMMENT*:
The above noted applications are located outside the Grand River Conservation Authority areas
of interest. As such, we will not undertake a review of the applications and plan review fees will
not be required. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Andrew Herreman
Resource Planning Technician
Grand River Conservation Authority
"These comments are respectfully submitted as advice and reflect resource concerns within the scope and mandate of the Page 1 of 1
Grand River Conservation Authority.