HomeMy WebLinkAboutDSD-18-172 - A 2018-128 - 24 Crosswinds DrStaff Repoil
Development Services Department
REPORT TO:
DATE OF MEETING:
SUBMITTED BY:
PREPARED BY:
WARD:
DATE OF REPORT:
REPORT #:
SUBJECT:
1
wwwki tch en er. ca
Committee of Adjustment
December 11, 2018
Juliane von Westerholt, Senior Planner - 519-741-2200 ext. 7157
Erika Kohek, Student Planner — 519-741-2200 ext. 7074
2
December 5, 2018
DSD -18-172
A2018-128 — 24 Crosswinds Drive
Applicant — Phil Ha
Approve
ap
Location Map: 24 Crosswinds Drive
R.
*** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. ***
Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance.
REPORT
Planning Comments:
The subject property located at 24 Crosswinds Drive zoned Residential 4 (R-4) with Special Regulation
597R in Zoning By-law 85-1 and is designated as Low Rise Residential in the 1994 Official Plan and
the 2014 Official Plan (under appeal).
The applicant is requesting relief from Section 6.1.1.1.b) iv) of the Zoning By-law to allow a driveway
access to be located 7.90 metres from the intersection of the street lines abutting the lot rather than the
required setback of 9.0 metres.
City Planning staff conducted a site inspection of the property on November 26, 2018.
View of 24 Crosswinds Drive
In considering the four tests for minor variances as outlined in Section 45(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O.,
1990 Chap. P. 13, as amended, Planning staff offer the following comments.
The subject property is designated Low Rise Residential in both the City's 1994 Official Plan and
2014 Official Plan. It should be noted that a significant number of Low Rise Residential policies from
the 2014 Official Plan are under appeal. Therefore, Low Rise Residential Policy 3.1.2.1 from the
1994 Official Plan which allows for low density forms of housing such as single detached dwellings
is being relied upon to determine whether the proposed variance meets the general intent of the
Official Plan. It is planning staff's opinion that the proposed variance meets the general intent of the
Official Plan which encourages a range of different forms of housing to achieve a low density
neighbourhood. The requested variance is appropriate and will maintain the low density character of
the property and new surrounding neighbourhood. The proposed variance meets the general intent
of the Official Plan.
2. The request to legalize the driveway located 7.90 metres from the intersection of the street lines,
whereas 9.0 metres is required meets the general intent of the Zoning By-law. The reduction of 1.1
metres from the required 9.0 metres can be considered minor. The intent of the 9.0 metre setback is
to ensure that there are no obstructions within the corner visibility triangle, and ensuring vehicles
entering and exiting the intersection can do so safely. It is not anticipated that any negative impacts
on the adjacent residential properties will result from the variances required therefore, the general
intent of the Zoning By-law continues to be maintained.
3. The variances can be considered minor as it is the opinion of staff that the required parking space
can continue to be accommodated on site in a safe manner. The setback of 7.90 metres from the
intersection of the street lines will not present any significant impacts to adjacent properties and the
overall neighbourhood.
4. The variance is appropriate for the development and use of the land. The requested variance should
not impact the existing character of the surrounding neighbourhood.
Based on the foregoing, Planning staff is of the opinion that the variance is minor and meets the general
intent of the Zoning By-law and is appropriate for the lot and surrounding neighbourhood, and recommends
that this application be approved.
Building Comments:
The Building Division has no objections to the proposed variance provided a revision to the issued building
permit is obtained prior to construction. Please contact the Building Division @ 519-741-2433 with any
questions.
Transportation Services Comments:
As the proposed reduction would not affect the corner visibility triangle, Transportation Services have
no concerns with a 1.1 m reduction from the required 9.Om intersection setback to a driveway, to
provide a 7.9m setback.
Heritage Planning Comments:
No heritage planning comments.
Environmental Planning Comments:
No environmental planning concerns.
Engineering Comments:
No engineering comments or concerns.
RECOMMENDATION
That minor variance application A2018-128 requesting relief from Section 6.1.1.1.b) iv) of the Zoning
By-law to allow a driveway access to be located 7.90 metres from the intersection of the street lines
abutting the lot whereas 9.0 metres is required be approved.
Juliane von Westerholt, BES, MCIP, RPP
Senior Planner
Region of Waterloo
November 29, 2018
Holly Dyson
City of Kitchener
200 King Street West
P.O. Box 1118
Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7
Dear Ms. Dyson:
PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT
AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES
150 Frederick Street, 8th Floor
Kitchener ON N2G 4A Canada
Telephone: 519-575-4400
TTY: 519-575-4608
Fax: 519-575-4449
www. reg i o n ofwate r l o o. ca
File No.: D20-20/VAR KIT GEN
Re: Committee of Adjustment Meeting on December 11, 2018, City of Kitchener
Regional staff have reviewed the following Committee of Adjustment applications and
have following comments:
1. SG 2018-014 — 321 Fischer Hallman Road — No Concerns
2. SG 2018-015 — 371 Franklin Street North — No Concerns
3. A 2018-126 — 468 Trussler Road — No Concerns
4. A 2018-128 — 24 Crosswinds Drive — No Concerns
5. A 2018-129 — 398 Rivertrail Avenue — No Concerns
6.
A 2018-130
—
374, 380 and 384 Prospect Avenue — No Concerns
7.
A 2018-131
—
414 and 424 Prospect Avenue — No Concerns
8.
A 2018-132
—
114-120 Victoria Street South — No Concerns
9.
A 2018-133
—
121 Walter Street — No Concerns
10.A
2018-134
—
76 Grand Flats Trail — No Concerns
11.
A 2018-135
— 171 Rivertrail Avenue — No Concerns
12.
A 2018-136
— 248 Shady Glen Cres — No Concerns
13.
A 2018-137
— 1 Goodrich Drive AKA 1 Chandaria Place — No Concerns
14.
A 2018-138
— 242, 254 and 262 Queen Street South — No Concerns
15.
A 2018-139
— 16 Chapel Hill Drive — No Concerns
16.
A 2018-140
— 405 and 409 Nyberg Street — No Concerns
17.A
2018-141
—
1800 Victoria Street North — No Concerns
Please be advised that any development on the subject lands is subject to the
provisions of the Regional Development Charge By-law 14-046 or any successor
thereof and may require payment of Regional Development Charges for these
developments prior to the issuance of a building permit.
The comments contained in this letter pertain to the Application numbers listed. If a site
is subject to more than one application, additional comments may apply.
Document Number: 2877629
Please forward any decisions on the above mentioned Application numbers to the
undersigned.
Yours Truly,
Monirul Islam, P.Eng.
Transportation Planner
(519) 575-4435
Grand River Conservation Authority
Resource Management Division
Andrew Herreman, Resource Planning
Technician
400 Clyde Road, P.O. Box 729
Cambridge, Ontario N 1 R 5W6
Phone: (519) 621-2761 ext. 2228
E-mail: aherreman@grandriver.ca
PLAN REVIEW REPORT: City of Kitchener
Holly Dyson
DATE: December 3, 2018 YOUR FILE: See below
RE: Applications for Minor Variance (Signs and Fences):
SG 2018-014 321 Fischer Hallman Road
SG 2018-015 371 Franklin Street North
FN 2018-003 626 Blair Creek Drive
Applications for Minor Variance:
A 2018-116
359 Alice Avenue
A 2018-123
106 Ahrens Street West
A 2018-125
810 Frederick Street
A 2018-126
468 Trussler Road
A 2018-128
24 Crosswinds Drive
A 2018-129
398 Rivertrail Avenue
A 2018-130
374, 380 & 384 Prospect Avenue
A 2018-131
414 & 424 Prospect Avenue
A 2018-133
121 Walter Street
A 2018-134
76 Grand Flats Trail
A 2018-135
171 Rivertrail Avenue
A 2018-136
248 Shady Glen Crescent
A 2018-137
1 Goodrich Drive/1 Chandaria Place
A 2018-138
242, 254 & 262 Queen Street South
A 2018-139
16 Chapel Hill Drive
Applications for Consent:
B 2018-121
59 Irvin Street
B 2018-122
20 Victoria Marie Court/15 Prince Albert Boulevard
B 2018-124
34 Third Avenue
B 2018-126
53 Second Avenue
B 2018-127
385 Frederick Street
GRCA COMMENT*:
The above noted applications are located outside the Grand River Conservation Authority areas
of interest. As such, we will not undertake a review of the applications and plan review fees will
not be required. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Andrew Herreman
Resource Planning Technician
Grand River Conservation Authority
"These comments are respectfully submitted as advice and reflect resource concerns within the scope and mandate of the Page 1 of 1
Grand River Conservation Authority.