HomeMy WebLinkAboutDSD-19-011 - A 2019-001 - 439 Park StStaff Repoil K;x �R
Development Services Department wwwkitchener.ca
REPORT TO: Committee of Adjustment
DATE OF MEETING: January 15th, 2019
SUBMITTED BY: Juliane von Westerholt, Senior Planner - 519-741-2200 ext. 7157
PREPARED BY: Eric Schneider, Junior Planner— 519-741-2200 ext. 7843
WARD: 9
DATE OF REPORT: January 7th, 2019
REPORT #: DSD -19-011
SUBJECT: A2019-001 — 439 Park Street
Applicant — Jo -Ann Malhotra
Recommendation: Approve
Ike
REPORT
Location Map: 439 Park Street
Planning Comments:
The subject property located at 439 Park Street is zoned Community Institutional Zone (1-2) in
the Zoning By-law 85-1 with Special Use Provision 102U. The property is designated
*** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. ***
Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance.
Community Institutional in the K -W Hospital Neighbourhood Secondary Plan in the 1994 Official
Plan. Staff conducted a site inspection of the property on December 21St, 2018.
The applicant is requesting relief from Section 6.1.1.1(a)(iv) to legalize parking spaces located
OM from a street line rather than the required 3M.
View of Parking Lot on Site (December 215, 2018)
In considering the four tests for minor variances as outlined in Section 45(1) of the Planning Act,
R.S.O., 1990 Chap. P. 13, as amended, Planning staff offers the following comments.
The requested variance meets the general intent of the Official Plan. The subject property is
designated Community Institutional in the K -W Hospital Secondary Plan in the 1994 Official
Plan. The Community Institutional designation recognizes the existence of community
services (such as the existing health office on the subject site) that are intended to be
complementary to the existing residential uses in the neighbourhood. The parking layout
represents an existing situation and therefore the requested variance meets the general
intent of the Official Plan.
2. The requested variance meets the general intent of the Zoning By-law. The intent of the
regulation that requires 3 metres between parking spaces and the street line is to provide
adequate space for landscaping between parking areas and the public realm. Landscaped
areas act as a buffer to ensure that parking areas do not conflict with pedestrian and
vehicular movements at the street line. In this situation, the subject property does in fact
contain a landscape bed located between the sidewalk and the parking area that is
approximately 6 metres wide that has been conveyed to the City for future road widening.
Therefore, the requested variance meets the intent of the By-law as there is a more than
adequate area to buffer the parking area from the street line.
3. The proposed variances are considered desirable and appropriate for the development and
use of the lands. The parking layout is an existing situation and Staff believes it to be
appropriate for the use of the lands.
4. The variance is considered minor. No changes to the layout of the site are proposed so Staff
considers the variance to be minor.
Building Comments:
The Building Division has no objections to the proposed variance.
Transportation Services Comments:
Transportation Services have no concerns with the proposed application.
Heritage Planning Comments:
The Kitchener Cultural Heritage Landscape Study (CHLS) dated December 2014 and prepared
by The Landplan Collaborative Ltd. was approved by Council in 2015. The CHLS serves to
establish an inventory. The CHLS was the first step of a phased Cultural Heritage Landscape
(CHL) conservation process. The owner of the property municipally addressed as 439 Park
Street is advised that the property is located within the Gildner Neighbourhood CHL. The owner
and the public will be consulted as the City considers listing CHLs on the Municipal Heritage
Register, identifying CHLs in the Official Plan, and preparing action plans for each CHL with
specific conservation options.
Environmental Planning Comments:
No environmental planning concerns due to nature of application.
RECOMMENDATION
That application A2019-001 requesting permission to legalize parking spaces set back
Om from a street line rather than the required setback of 3m be approved.
Eric Schneider, BES
Junior Planner
Juliane von Westerholt, B.E.S., MCIP, RPP
Senior Planner
Region of Waterloo
January 3, 2019
Holly Dyson
City of Kitchener
200 King Street West
P.O. Box 1118
Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7
Dear Ms. Dyson:
PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT
AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES
150 Frederick Street, 8th Floor
Kitchener ON N2G 4A Canada
Telephone: 519-575-4400
TTY: 519-575-4608
Fax: 519-575-4449
www. reg i o n ofwate r l o o. ca
File No.: D20-20/VAR KIT GEN
1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8-13, 15-16
Re: Committee of Adjustment Meeting on Tuesday, January 15th, 2019, City of
Kitchener
Regional staff have reviewed the following Committee of Adjustment applications and
have no comments:
1. FN 2019-001
— 27 Glasgow Street, Jay Harrison & Sean Geobey
2. SG 2019-001
— 70 King Street East, EuroPro (Kitchener) GP Inc.
3. SG 2019-002
— 439 Park Street, Jo -Ann Malhotra
4. A 2019-001 —
439 Park Street, Jo -Ann Malholtra
5. A 2019-002 —
106 Idle Creek Drive, James Abohbot
6. A 2019-003 —
487 Riverbend Drive, Grerei Investments Ltd.
7. A 2019-004 —
54 Bridge Street, Marann Homes Ltd.
8. A 2019-005 —
362 Edwin Street, Kirk and Jeraldine Van Os
9. A 2019-006 —
925 Thomas Pedder Court, Activa Holdings Inc.
10.A 2019-007 —
35 Trillium Drive, Huron Creek Holdings Corp.
11.A 2019-008 —
242 Ingleside Place, William Cody Willems
12.A 2019-009 —
63 Pinedale Drive, Sheldon John Foley
13.A 2019-010 —
150 Mill Street, Tom Ferguson
14.A 2019-011 —
270 Spadina Road East, 270 Spadina Kitchener Inc.
15.A 2019-012 —
50 Moore Avenue, Cathy DeBrabandere
16.A 2019-013 —
25 Fourth Avenue, Lino & Angela Santarossa
17.A 2018-127 —
659-663 Victoria Street South, Eight -Loop Inc.
Please be advised that any development on the subject lands is subject to the
provisions of the Regional Development Charge By-law 14-046 or any successor
thereof and may require payment of Regional Development Charges for these
developments prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Document Number: 2898843
The comments contained in this letter pertain to the Application numbers listed. If a site
is subject to more than one application, additional comments may apply.
Please forward any decisions on the above mentioned Application numbers to the
undersigned.
Yours Truly,
Jason Wigglesworth, C.E.T.
Transportation Planner
(519) 575-4835
Filing: 2 — 06 FREDERICK — Crabby Joe's
7 — 52 — 2019641 Ontario Ltd.
14 — VAR KIT — 270 Spadina Kitchener Inc.
17 — 55 — Silicon North Real Estate Inc.
Grand River Conservation Authority
Resource Management Division
Andrew Herreman, Resource Planning
Technician
400 Clyde Road, P.O. Box 729
Cambridge, Ontario N 1 R 5W6
Phone: (519) 621-2761 ext. 2228
E-mail: aherreman@grandriver.ca
PLAN REVIEW REPORT: City of Kitchener
Holly Dyson
DATE: January 3, 2019 YOUR FILE: See below
RE: Applications for Minor Variance (Signs and Fences):
SG 2019-001 70 King Street East
SG 2019-002 439 Park Street
FN 2019-001 27 Glasgow Street
Applications for Minor Variance:
A 2018-127
659-663 Victoria Street South
A 2019-001
439 Park Street
A 2019-003
487 Riverbend Drive
A 2019-004
54 Bridge Street West
A 2019-005
362 Edwin Street
A 2019-006
925 Thomas Pedder Court
A 2019-007
35 Trillium Drive
A 2019-008
242 Ingleside Place
A 2019-009
63 Pinedale Drive
A 2019-010
150 Mill Street
A 2019-011
270 Spadina Road East
A 2019-012
50 Moore Avenue
A 2019-013
25 Fourth Avenue
Applications for Consent:
B 2019-001
427 Old Chicopee Trail
B 2019-002
25 Fourth Avenue
B 2019-003
31 Fourth Avenue
B 2019-004
31 Fourth Avenue
GRCA COMMENT*:
The above noted applications are located outside the Grand River Conservation Authority areas
of interest. As such, we will not undertake a review of the applications and plan review fees will
not be required. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Andrew Herreman
Resource Planning Technician
Grand River Conservation Authority
"These comments are respectfully submitted as advice and reflect resource concerns within the scope and mandate of the Page 1 of 1
Grand River Conservation Authority.