Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPublic Works - 1999-03-22PWTC\1999-03-22 PUBLIC WORKS & TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MINUTES MARCH 22, 1999 CITY OF KITCHENER The Public Works and Transportation Committee met this date under the Chairmanship of Councillor John Smola, with the following members present: Councillors J. Haalboom, C. Weylie, B. Vrbanovic, and Jake Smola. Mayor C. Zehr and Councillors G. Lorentz, J. Ziegler, and K. Taylor-Harrison were in attendance for part of the meeting. Others Present: Councillor T. Galloway, Ms. P. Houston, Ms. K. Rienert, Ms. J. Billett, and Messrs. E. Kovacs, S. Gyorffy, D. Snow, J. McBride, D. Mansell, J. Gazzola, J. Shivas, and L. Neil. This meeting of the Public Works and Transportation Committee commenced at 8:40 a.m. 1. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT POLICY The Committee was in receipt of a report outlining proposed changes to the Storm Water Management policy and review process as it relates to the processing of Section 41 Development Agreements for site specific applications. Mr. E. Kovacs provided the Committee with a PowerPoint presentation in which he noted that re-evaluation of the process was undertaken because of the many concerns raised by the development industry who view the current process as being too constraining and unreasonable. He advised that the evolution of the Storm Water Management process has seen a shifting from a more global review down to a micro-level of site specific review. It was pointed out that, from a developer's perspective, the current site specific review process poses a number of disadvantages relating to physical space demands, lengthy time delays, financial constraints and the long term maintenance obligations that require financial commitment that is too costly. From an environmental aspect the maintenance costs pose a major deterrent in maintaining on-site Storm Water Management Ponds and, accordingly, the objectives of an on-site facility are not being met. Mr. Kovacs noted that staff are obligated to carry out and enforce the present process which has placed them in conflict with the development industry. As a result of the conflicting environment, he advised that staff are now recommending abandonment of the current site specific review process to be replaced with the concept of communal ponds. Mr. Kovacs commented that the proposed approach toward communal ponds would alleviate this conflict through effective use of existing Storm Water Management Ponds, thereby speeding up the process and removing long term maintenance from the developer. Maintenance would be carried out by the City, ensuring that objectives, including environmental issues, are met. Mr. Kovacs pointed out to the Committee that in order to undertake this change in policy, staff are recommending that all Section 41 applications be exempt from Storm Water Management review and that an engineering consultant be retained to determine the specific requirements to implement a global Storm Water Management System. The consultants report will take into consideration a fee structure which will self-fund the cost for this global approach. Further, he noted that staff are recommending all Storm Water Management Ponds be integrated into a comprehensive database within the computerized Infrastructure Management System to facilitate long term management of these facilities. It is anticipated that interim funding for this project will be approximately $70,000 in 1999 and will require additional funding in the years 2000 to 2001. In conclusion, he stated that the change in process proposed will result in refinement and improvement upon the current process and create a more harmonious relationship between staff and the development industry. Mayor C. Zehr inquired what reaction had been received from the development industry towards the concept of communal ponds. Mr. Kovacs responded that he and Mr. J. Gazzola had met with a majority of the development industry and were encouraged by a very positive response from them towards the new concept. Councillor K. Taylor-Harrison entered the meeting at this point. Mayor C. Zehr questioned what, if any, risks the City would be taking in implementing such a change and, in particular, whether basic needs would still be met. Mr. Kovacs responded that staff believe existing ponds can handle the additional quantity without the need for major reconstruction to enlarge these facilities, however, some upgrading will be required to meet 1. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT POLICY (CONT'D) PUBLIC WORKS & TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MINUTES MARCH 22, 1999 - 20 - CITY OF KITCHENER quality standards. In this respect, he felt that the risk to the City would be minimal. Further, he pointed out that half of the built-up areas of the City are already serviced by Storm Water Management and by removing the constraints for site specific review the City will be better off in the long run. Mayor C. Zehr further questioned the necessity to hire a consultant given the fact that the proposal, if implemented, will serve to relieve staff. Mr. Kovacs responded that more detailed analysis is required and in-house resources are not adequate to meet this need. Expertise is required to address a number of technical issues in evaluating areas to be addressed for Storm Water Management, continued review of the new process, and development of a comprehensive, uniform fee structure. Councillor J. Haalboom requested staff to provide an example of a Section 41 application within the catchment area of an existing Storm Water Management Pond that would be exempted from the current reviews as a result of implementation of this proposal. Mr. D. Mansell responded that, within the Huron Business Park, the majority of existing Storm Water Management Ponds were established under the old system and the consultant will be asked to look at this area to determine what will be needed to upgrade in order to meet quality standards. Further examples are ponds located adjacent to Autumn Hill Crescent and near Resurrection High School. Mr. Kovacs further pointed out that he had discussed the new proposal with the Grand River Conservation Authority and, again, the response had been positive. Councillor J. Haalboom questioned how difficult it would be to include the built-up area surrounding, and including, the Downtown. Mr. Kovacs advised that dealing with built-up areas, and in particular the core area, would be the most challenging. He pointed out, however, that an additional catchment could be provided if the Victoria Park area was included as a Storm Water Management facility. Staff are cognizant, however, that retrofitting this area as a Storm Water Management facility will require considerable effort and cost to maintain the existing high quality recreational use and protect the area from environmental concerns. Victoria Park aside, Mr. Kovacs noted that it will be difficult to find affordable space within the Downtown area which will present significant challenge in servicing the area with Storm Water Management Ponds. Councillors J. Ziegler and T. Galloway entered the meeting at this time. Councillor Haalboom noted that implementation of the new policy will require ongoing funding and inquired if costs to maintain such a program are known at this time. In response, Mr. Kovacs pointed out that, as part of the Terms of Reference for the engineering study, the consultant will be directed to develop a fee structure that will allow this process to be self-funded. Councillor Haalboom further inquired whether a policy was in place that would render the consultant preparing the engineering study ineligible to bid on subsequent projects to prohibit the consultant from having an inside track. In response, Mr. Kovacs stated that this is not likely to occur, in that, the nature of a consultants business requires an unbiased approach. He noted, however, that this concern could be a part of the criteria to be considered during the selection process for future projects. Councillor Haalboom commended staff for their efforts in improving the process for Storm Water Management and inquired if the ultimate goal was to create a master plan for the most up- to-date methods of dealing with Storm Water Management. Mr. Kovacs responded that this was correct. Councillor T. Galloway questioned what effect the new policy will have on existing ponds and if it will be possible for current owners to decommission on-site ponds. As an example, he cited the Huron Business Park which has many on-site ponds, and questioned if an owner wanted to expand and take over Storm Water Management on-site, would it be allowed. Mr. Kovacs advised that the new policy was not intended to be retroactive and, in his view, it would be possible for existing Storm Water Management Ponds to be decommissioned. He pointed out, however, that if a major redevelopment project is proposed in such an area it may then fall under the new policy. 1. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT POLICY (CONT'D) PUBLIC WORKS & TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MINUTES MARCH 22, 1999 -21 - CITY OF KITCHENER In reference to the quality components outlined on the map included with the report, Councillor Galloway questioned if there were any engineered Storm Water Management Ponds in the location of the Red Cedar Swamp, as the map seemed to indicate there were none. Mr. Kovacs responded that staff had inventoried all existing Storm Water Management Ponds as shown on the existing map, however, if it was felt to be inaccurate this would need to be reviewed. Councillor Galloway inquired if it was possible that it was not included because it was a natural formation rather than engineered. Mr. Mansell pointed out that, at the time the area in question was developed and as part of the Trillium Drive extension, Storm Water Management Ponds were included that meet both quantity and quality standards. Councillor Galloway asked for assurance that the quality of the cold water stream running into Strasburg Creek would not be impacted as this would be a major concern to the municipality. Mr. Kovacs advised that the time during which the study is undertaken will pose the greatest risk as developers will be exempt from the review process, and suggested that the Committee may wish to recommend to staff further protection measures. He noted, however, that he did not foresee any serious environmental impacts resulting from the exemption stage. Councillor Galloway further questioned, in reference to the map, where Phase 3 would drain to. Mr. Mansell advised that Phase 3 filters through the entire system, passing through two or three ponds along the way, before coming into the headwaters of Strasburg Creek in the area of Mclntyre/Trillium Drives. Councillor Galloway questioned what environmental impacts this may have on the Creek and Mr. Kovacs responded that a fundamental review on-site could be applied and partial treatment provided; however, he could not fully ascertain the impact at this time. Councillor Galloway stated that he was generally supportive of the new policy and sympathetic to the developer's concerns with the current process, however, he encouraged staff to view this area of Strasburg Creek as site specific in nature. He pointed out that, within Phase 3, a number of new purchases have been undertaken which, without the current Section 41 review process, may pose environmental threats to the Huron Natural Area and suggested that staff may need to consider constructing an additional facility to service this area. Mr. Kovacs again pointed out that the City will be most vulnerable during the six to eight months it will take to complete the study and suggested that the Committee may wish to pass a resolution that will allow staff to require high risk applications to not be exempt from site specific review. Councillor Galloway, while not in disagreement with this suggestion, asked that consideration be given to other control mechanisms such as building an additional facility rather than relying on the Red Cedar Swamp. Mr. Kovacs advised that staff would undertake to review this suggestion and provide Council with a response prior to its consideration of the matter at its meeting to be held on March 29, 1999. Councillor Haalboom stated that she was in agreement with Councillor Galloway's concerns with respect to the Huron Natural Area. She noted, however, that during the study period of six to nine months, the potential to take advantage may result in additional areas of concern and questioned if it was feasible to come up with an answer in one weeks time. Mr. Kovacs responded that the greatest risk is in areas where there are no existing ponds and, again, stated that direction could be given to staff to utilize full Storm Water Management review for high risk applications during the interim period. On motion by Mayor C. Zehr- it was resolved: "That, effective immediately, all Section 41 applications that lie within catchment areas of existing Storm Water Management Ponds be exempt from Storm Water Management reviews, as specified in the 'Site Grading, Erosion Control, Servicing and Storm Water Management Guidelines'; and further, That, effective immediately, all Section 41 applications that lie within catchment areas that do not have existing Storm Water Management Ponds, but which will be subject to an engineering study to determine specific requirements to implement a 'global' Storm Water 1. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT POLICY (CONT'D) Management System be exempt from detailed Storm Water Management reviews and be PUBLIC WORKS & TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MINUTES MARCH 22, 1999 - 22 - CITY OF KITCHENER subject to fundamental lot grading and surface considerations; and further, That an engineering consultant be retained to determine specific requirements to implement a 'global' Storm Water Management system, as outlined in the report presented to the Public Works and Transportation Committee on March 22, 1999; and further, That a fee structure be determined to self-fund, and equitably distribute, the costs for a 'global' Storm Water Management system, the amount of which is to be determined through the engineering study; and further, That staff of the Department of Public Works integrate all Storm Water Management Ponds into a comprehensive database, in the computerized Infrastructure Management System, to facilitate the long term management of these facilities; and further, That all interim funding of $70,000 in 1999, to undertake the above initiatives, be provided from the Capital Contingency Fund, and additional funding in 2000-2001, to be determined by the engineering study; and further, That staff of the Department of Public Works, in collaboration with the Business Enterprise Centre, promote awareness among the stakeholders of the policy change." 2. DOPWR 99-8 - COMMUNITY SAFETY ZONES The Committee was in receipt of a report outlining a proposal to create Community Safety Zones within the municipality pursuant to legislation enacted by the Ontario Government. Mr. J. McBride pointed out to the Committee, that through enactment of this legislation, the municipality may now designate by by-law portions of roadways where in Council's view public safety is of special concern. These could include areas near schools, community centres, parks, or areas with high vehicular collision rates or operational or geometric deficiencies. Within a designated zone the minimum financial penalty for moving violations issued by a Police Officer to a motorist will be doubled. Mr. McBride pointed out that it was desirable to provide a consistent approach to the development of Community Safety Zones throughout the Region and, in this regard, a working group was formed consisting of representatives from the seven area municipalities along with staff of the Region of Waterloo. In order to develop criteria for the implementation of Community Safety Zones the working group followed the basic guidelines as defined by the Province, as outlined below: Community Safety Zones cannot apply to a large geographic area. The intent is to address specific chronic problem areas where other forms of compliance have failed to modify driver behaviour. Community Safety Zones cannot be implemented through a construction zone. Community Safety Zones should not be introduced to an area at the same time as the implementation of other traffic control measures; i.e. traffic calming - physical barriers. This will permit the proper evaluation for each initiative individually to measure their effectiveness. Community Safety Zones must be clearly defined by signs and should not be excessive in length. (The working group is recommending a length of approximately 2 kilometres in an urban area.) Community Safety Zones can be restricted to days of the week, and times of the day, if appropriate, to address specific concerns. 2. DOPWR 99-8 - COMMUNITY SAFETY ZONES (CONT'D) The reasons for the designation of Community Safety Zones should be defendable so that penalties imposed for violations committed within these zones do not fall under scrutiny. MARCH 22, 1999 PUBLIC WORKS & TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MINUTES - 23 - CITY OF KITCHENER Community Safety Zones can be removed if changes to driver behaviour are successful and consistent. Based on these guidelines, the working group established the following four key factors as criteria for developing Community Safety Zones: speeding; collisions; operational constraints (proximity of school crossings, day care centres, senior centres, hospitals, etc.); and, geometric constraints (roadway alignment, number of lanes, lack of sidewalks, bike lanes, train crossings, etc.). Each factor has been assessed on a point system with one point being the least impact and five points being the greatest impact. Mr. McBride advised that staff reviewed 26 locations throughout the City and the top 12 locations, as rated, were outlined within the report. Mr. McBride further advised the Committee that the working group had decided to designate one local street and one Regional road within each municipality for the purpose of this trial. In this regard, he advised that staff are recommending Queen's Boulevard (local street), between Highland Road and Fischer-Hallman Road and Westmount Road (Regional road), between Chopin Drive and Erb Street be designated as Community Safety Zones within the municipality. Mr. McBride pointed out that implementation is planned for June 1, 1999, with a review after one year and, prior to implementation, staff will undertake a publicity campaign through local media. Councillor G. Lorentz inquired why the Queen's Boulevard zone would end at Fischer-Hallman Road rather than proceeding to the next block ending at Westheights Drive. He noted that within this area there is a community centre, a mall, two major Transit drop-offs and a community trail. Mr. McBride responded that the Provincial guidelines stress that Community Safety Zones not be excessive in length and, accordingly, the working group recommended a length of approximately 2 kilometres. The proposed zone along Queen's Boulevard is approximately 2.3 kilometres in length and the working group was concerned that if extended further it could be considered excessive in length. Further, he noted that speeding is not a concern in the section in question and the flow of traffic is also impacted by traffic signals at Elmridge Drive. He stated that the zone could be extended but, for the purpose of the trial period, it was not felt to be necessary. Councillor Lorentz also questioned why a one year trial period was being recommended and suggested that this was too long a period. Mr. McBride advised that a one year trial period was felt to be necessary to adequately assess other traffic calming measures, seasonal constraints and Police enforcement issues. He noted that, throughout the Region, the Police will be required to enforce 14 zones and it is important to have sufficient time to analyze the impact on Police resources. Councillor Lorentz advised that he was prepared to move the recommendation contained in the report, however, he asked that staff consider adding the block between Fischer-Hallman Road and Westheights Drive and respond at the Council meeting of March 29, 1999. Councillor C. Weylie extended her thanks to staff for including Westmount Road as a Community Safety Zone. As speeding is a major concern along Westmount Road, she inquired whether a consistent speed limit of 50 kilometres per hour could be implemented along the designated zone. Mr. McBride advised that, in order to make this change, the Regional Municipality of Waterloo would have to be approached. In this regard, he suggested that a separate recommendation be formulated to request the Region to make this change. Councillor J. Haalboom inquired if the implementation of Community Safety Zones primarily dealt with Police enforcement and if such enforcement eliminated normal enforcement practices. Mr. McBride advised that the success of a Community Safety Zone relies heavily on Police enforcement with the intent being to implement a doubling of fines for any moving violations, and this will not preclude normal enforcement throughout the City. Councillor Haalboom also noted that Pioneer Drive was listed as a proposed zone and inquired if the intersection at Homer Watson Boulevard had been taken into consideration. Mr. McBride confirmed that the intersection of Pioneer Drive and Homer Watson Boulevard had been considered when DOPWR 99-8 - COMMUNITY SAFETY ZONES (CONT'D) determining areas for Community Safety Zones. Councillor Haalboom questioned the figure of 4 under the column for Collisions between 1995 to 1997 for this intersection and, in response, Mr. McBride clarified that the figure of 4 relates to the rating system not the number of actual collisions. Mr. Snow also pointed out that other traffic calming measures are being implemented in the area of Homer Watson Boulevard and Pioneer Drive and these, together with other projects such as the MARCH 22, 1999 PUBLIC WORKS & TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MINUTES - 24 - CITY OF KITCHENER Ottawa Street bridge removal, were taken into consideration. Councillor K. Taylor-Harrison commended staff for development of the Community Safety Zone program and, following review of the guidelines and criteria, was in agreement with the choice of Queen's Boulevard as a designated zone. She pointed out that she had additional suggestions for safety zones but was aware of the limitations respecting Police enforcement. With respect to the Ottawa Street bridge closure, Councillor Jake Smola inquired if consideration had been given to implementing a Community Safety Zone along Krug Street which will be a designated detour route and substantially impacted by the closure. Alternatively, he suggested that staff consider other means of traffic calming such as stop control intersections. Mr. Snow advised that staff are aware that the closing of the Ottawa Street bridge will impact a number of streets and, through careful planning of detours, will try to lessen the impact. In addition, staff will continue to monitor the situation and, if necessary, consider implementing traffic calming measures. Councillor T. Galloway pointed out that speeding is a predominant complaint among constituents and he anticipates additional requests from the public for more Community Safety Zones once the program has been advertised. In this regard, he questioned how it was determined that only one local and one Regional road for each municipality would be implemented for the trial period. In his view, this allocation between large municipalities vs. township areas appears to be disproportionate. Mr. McBride responded that this had been an arbitrary decision of the working group with the intent being to implement the program uniformly across the Region. He noted that, while a number of locations were identified within the City of Kitchener, there are other critical areas outside the municipality that need to be addressed. Mr. McBride indicated that once the trial period was over expansion of the program would likely be concentrated within the larger municipalities rather than the townships. In regard to expansion, Councillor Galloway inquired what steps are currently being undertaken by the Police Board to meet the demand for enforcement and, in particular, whether any thought had been given to the allocation of existing or new traffic enforcement staff. Mr. McBride advised that a representative of the Police had participated in the working group and the issue of enforcement is of concern to them. He pointed out that, following the initial trial period, an evaluation will take place which will assist the Police in determining the impact on enforcement resources. Councillor J. Ziegler pointed out that hiring new Police Officers will not immediately be effective in alleviating the burden of enforcement due to the length of time it takes to train and orient new personnel. Councillor Galloway stressed that the issue of enforcement must be a component of the evaluation process in order to have a realistic analysis for expansion purposes. In this regard, he suggested that the Police Board be approached to identify the enforcement issue as a priority during their budget deliberations. Councillor Ziegler concurred that the matter could be discussed by the Police Board as a budget issue. Councillor Galloway inquired whether a staff letter would be sufficient or if a formal resolution should be forwarded to the Police Board. Mr. McBride advised that it should be in the form of a separate resolution. On motion by Councillor G. Lorentz - it was resolved: "That, effective June 1, 1999, Council adopt the Community Safety Zone program for a trial period of 1 year; and further, That a Community Safety Zone be implemented on Queen's Boulevard, between Highland Road and Fischer-Hallman Road; and further, DOPWR 99-8 - COMMUNITY SAFETY ZONES (CONT'D) That Traffic and Parking By-law No. 94-101 be amended to incorporate Community Safety Zones; and further, That Council request the Regional Municipality of Waterloo to consider the implementation of a Community Safety Zone on Regional Road 50 - Westmount Road, from Chopin Drive MARCH 22, 1999 PUBLIC WORKS & TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MINUTES - 25 - CITY OF KITCHENER to Erb Street (Kitchener city limits)." On motion by Councillor C. Weylie - it was resolved: "That Council request the Regional Municipality of Waterloo to reduce the speed limit on Westmount Road, from Chopin Drive to Erb Street, to a uniform 50 kilometres per hour." On motion by Councillor G. Lorentz - it was resolved: "That the Waterloo Regional Police Services Board be requested to consider potential funding requirements for implementation of the Community Safety Zones program as part of their budget deliberations." DOPWR 99-9 - ON-STREET PARKING - LITTLEFIELD CRESCENT The Committee considered a report which recommends that parking be prohibited on both sides of Littlefield Crescent, from the north intersection at Williamsburg Road to a point 79 metres west thereof. On motion by Councillor G. Lorentz - it was resolved: "That parking be prohibited on both sides of Littlefield Crescent, from the north intersection at Williamsburg Road to a point 79 metres west thereof, from 11 p.m. to 6 a.m.; and further, That the Uniform Traffic By-law be amended accordingly." DOPWR 99-10- ADULT CROSSING GUARD- WESMOUNT ROAD AT FOREST HILL PUBLIC SCHOOL The Committee considered a report which recommends that an Adult Crossing Guard be placed at the traffic control signal on Westmount Road at Forest Hill Public School. It was pointed out the Traffic and Parking Division have reviewed traffic conditions on Westmount Road at the school in response to concerns raised by parents of children who attend the school. Parents who drive their children to school are currently delivering and picking up their children in the parking lot of the Calvin Presbyterian Church on the opposite side of Westmount Road from the school. This has increased usage of the pedestrian activated mid-block traffic signal by students, who range from kindergarten to grade 6. The traffic signal is only used at school bell times and, as a result, the majority of the time it is on a green phase. In this regard, there have been numerous reports of vehicles driving through the red light. In addition, Westmount Road is a primary arterial with very narrow lane widths and speeding has become a major problem. Accordingly, staff are of the opinion that establishing an Adult Crossing Guard at the traffic signal on Westmount Road will control safety of the children crossing the roadway. In response to Councillor J. Ziegler, Mr. D. Snow advised that the $5,000 cost for an Adult Crossing Guard is the actual cost for the year. Councillor T. Galloway inquired if staff were still discussing re-instituting delivery and pick-up of children in the parking lot of the Faith Lutheran Church, adjacent to the school. Mr. J. McBride responded that staff are discussing this matter with the Church; however, this has not been 4. DOPWR 99-10 - ADULT CROSSING GUARD - WESMOUNT ROAD AT FOREST HILL PUBLIC SCHOOL (CONT'D) finalized as the Church does have some concerns, one of which relates to liability. He stated that staff will continue to pursue this alternative. Councillor G. Lorentz inquired if the Adult Crossing Guard will be able to record the licence plates of any vehicles going through red lights. Mr. Snow responded that the Adult Crossing Guard is PUBLIC WORKS & TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MINUTES MARCH 22, 1999 - 26 - CITY OF KITCHENER primarily there to ensure that children do not proceed until all vehicles have stopped; however, if there is time the licence number of any such vehicle will be recorded. On motion by Councillor J. Ziegler- it was resolved: "That an Adult Crossing Guard facility be established as soon as possible at the traffic control signal on Westmount Road at Forest Hill Public School; and further, That the 1999 Operating Budget be amended to reflect an over-expenditure of $5,000." 5. STRATEGIC PLAN - ENGINEERING DIVISION By general consent, it was agreed that this matter would be deferred to the Committee's next meeting scheduled for April 12, 1999. 6. INFORMATION ITEMS The Committee received the following information reports: · Traffic Information - Ottawa Street & Old Chicopee Drive · K-W Expressway Improvements - Ottawa Street Closure · Ontario Traffic Conference - 50th Anniversary - 2000 Annual Convention · Gas Marketing Activities - Appollo Gas Inc. · 1998 Leaf Collection Program Summary Councillor G. Lorentz referred to a letter received from the City of Waterloo requesting Transit route changes to Routes 7 and 9, and Mr. Snow responded that he would be dealing with this matter in the near future. 7. ADJOURNMENT On motion, the meeting adjourned at 9:57 a.m. Janet Billett, AMCT Committee Administrator MARCH 22, 1999 COMMUNITY SAFETY ZONES PUBLIC WORKS & TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MINUTES - 27 - CITY OF KITCHENER 21 Queen's Blvd - Highland Rd to Fischer- I4nllmnn 2 11 4 4 17 Westmount Rd - 4 6 3 4 Chopin Dr to Erb St 15 Glasgow St- Belmont to Fischer-Hallman 5 3 3 4 14 Doon Village Rd - Bechtel to Doon South 5 1 4 4 14 Franklin St- 4 3 3 4 Weber St to Wilson Ave 14 Pioneer Dr 3 4 3 4 14 13 Highland Rd- Highland Cres to Westheights Homer Watson Blvd- Doon South to Hwy 401 3 5 3 3 4 3 3 3 13 Block Line Rd 5 3 4 1 13 Montgomery Rd 5 2 3 3 13 Westheights Dr - 5 2 3 3 McGarry Dr to Westforest Tr 13 Wilson Ave - 4 3 3 3 Webster Rd to arena end