HomeMy WebLinkAboutFinance & Admin - 1994-09-19FAC\1994-09-19
SEPTEMBER 19, 1994
FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MINUTES
CITY OF KITCHENER
The Finance and Administration Committee met this date, commencing at 10:15 a.m., under the
Chairmanship of Councillor C. Zehr with the following Members present: Mayor D.V. Cardillo, Councillors
B. Stortz, T. Galloway, G. Lorentz, J. Smola, C. Weylie, J. Ziegler and M. Yantzi. Councillor M. Wagner
was in attendance for part of the meeting.
Others present: Councillor G. Leadston, Messrs. T. McKay, T. Clancy, T. McCabe, R.W. Pritchard, J.
Witmer, J. Shivas, N. Kuntz, G. Sosnoski and Ms. D. Arnold.
KAPS SUGGESTION AWARD
Ms. D. Blake presented a cheque and a KAPS Recognition Plaque to Ms. J. Billett for her
suggestion relative to Local Improvement inquiries.
CHAPTER 530 (DOGS) - MUNICIPAL CODE
The Committee was in receipt of a report from Ms. D. Arnold dated September 14, 1994
recommending that Chapter 530 (Dogs) be amended to require the muzzling of dogs that have
bitten a person or animal and the imposition of an identification system for identifying such dogs.
Ms. Tawny Sinasac offered the opinion that the amendments proposed in Ms. Arnold's report do
not go far enough and only propose actions which can be taken after a vicious dog has attacked.
She suggested that any amendments should be more proactive and include more stringent leash
laws which would require that animals be leashed at all times when out of doors except in a secure
pen or a backyard with a sufficiently high fence. She also suggested that Kitchener follow the lead
of the City of Cambridge and broaden the terms under which a dog is considered to be running at
large.
Ms. Sinasac noted that she is the mother of two children and lives next door to a Rottweiler with no
physical barrier between the front yards. She noted that the dog has acted aggressively toward
her on three occasions and that she would feel much safer if animals of this type were better
controlled. She further suggested that the City expand the definition of vicious dogs to include
dogs exhibiting aggressive behaviour, increase current fines, recognize that a leash is not
synonymous with control, and prevent dogs from running unleashed in City parks.
Councillor Galloway noted that Ms. Sinasac has expressed many of his own concerns and views,
and noted that an enforcement process which is complaint driven is problematic and in most cases
will be reactive. Ms. Sinasac agreed, noting that she has not complained in the past as the
Rottweiler who lives next to her has stayed on the property. However, she pointed out that in her
opinion the situation is dangerous as there are fifteen children under the age of eleven in the
neighbourhood. In response to questions from Councillor Lorentz, Ms. Sinasac clarified that she
believes the leashing law should not be breed specific but should apply to all dogs, irrespective of
whether they are on public or private property. She also indicated that she agrees muzzling
should be mandatory once a dog has bitten. Councillor Yantzi asked what could be done to
encourage responsible behaviour by dog owners, and Ms. Sinasac suggested that fines should be
higher and be increased for repeat offenders. In response to a question from Councillor Leadston,
Ms. Sinasac advised that she agrees with all of the recommendations in the letter from Dr. G. Hess
of the Humane Society.
Ms. Arnold advised that at present the maximum fine under the City by-law is $5,000.00 per
offence and that the Humane Society can issue a summons to repeat offenders which could result
in a fine higher than the $35.00 impound fee. In regard to insurance for vicious dogs, she noted
that it is possible to place a rider on homeowner or tenant policies to specifically name the dog and
that such an amendment relative to Chapter 530 (Dogs) should be considered. Mr. Wilf Bonnell of
the Humane Society, pointed out that the type of insurance required under the existing by-law
cannot be obtained.
Ms. Shannon Boice, a breeder of purebred American Pitbull Terriers, and herself the mother of two
small children, indicated that she agrees with stricter leashing requirements, noting that in her
opinion retractable leashes are entirely inadequate. She also noted that the two recent
FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 197 1994
- 79 -
CITY OF KITCHENER
2. CHAPTER 530 (DOGS) - MUNICIPAL CODE CONT'D
attacks were the result of owner error and that the discussion should revolve around irresponsible
dog owners rather than irresponsible dogs. Ms. Boice added that none of her dogs have ever
bitten anyone and she does not allow them to run in a public place. She also indicated her
agreement with stiffer laws, but suggested these should not be breed specific. Ms. Boice criticized
a recent K-W Record article alleging that several of the comments attributed to her were either
incorrect or taken out of context.
In response to a question from Councillor Lorentz, Ms. Boice indicated that she supports proper
leashing of dogs from the door of their home, noting that this should be mandatory and that solid
nylon or leather leashes should be used rather than retractable leashes. Ms. Boice noted that her
purchasers are required to sign lengthy contracts which contain detailed information about the
Pitbull breed. She also suggested that if an original owner cannot keep a Pitbull the animal should
be destroyed, since they do not bond as readily with subsequent owners. She also suggested
dogs should be destroyed once they have bitten.
Ms. Cindy Mclnnes appeared on behalf of the K-W Kennel Club and noted that a breed specific
by-law is not appropriate and that any such legislation should address all potentially vicious dogs.
She noted that the Club is requesting an opportunity to work with the City in developing a
responsible vicious dog by-law. Councillor Leadston inquired whether Ms. Mclnnes agrees with
the nine suggestions in the report from the Humane Society. She indicated that she does not
agree in all cases and reviewed these item by item. Councillor Lorentz asked whether Ms.
Mclnnes supports the notion of leashing dogs from the door. She replied that she definitely
supports this measure as there is a potential for the dog to leave the property if unleashed.
Mr. Jerry MacDonald appeared on behalf of the K-W Humane Society and addressed the issue
from the view of the Board of Directors. He pointed out that the Society is not in favour of a breed
specific by-law as it would be difficult to enforce, especially if the breed is unregistered. He
acknowledged that it is difficult to prevent a dog from biting the first time, however, if a dog is found
at large on two or three separate occasions there is a high degree of likelihood that the dog will
bite or otherwise pose a problem. He indicated that the Society is proposing graduated fines in
this regard. He also expressed the opinion that most dogs do not require muzzling under normal
circumstances.
Councillor Leadston referred to the breed specific list of licences issued by the Human Society in
1994, a copy of which was circulated this date, and inquired as to the statistics for biting relative to
these breeds. Mr. MacDonald replied that these statistics are kept by the Regional Health Unit,
but are not presently conveyed to the Humane Society.
Mr. Brian Hatton of the Regional Health Unit advised that all animal bites are logged by the Unit
which is required to quarantine such animals. He pointed out that between 800-1200 animal bites
are investigated annually in the Region, but a breakdown by breed or variety is not available at
this time. Councillor Leadston asked that Mr. Hatton coordinate a meeting to discuss the
collection and sharing of information between all of the agencies involved.
Ms. Nancy Hummitzsch appeared on behalf of the K-W Kennel Club. She advised that she had
recently contacted the Canadian Kennel Club, a subcommittee of which had met over the
weekend and developed twelve pages of guidelines on the drafting of appropriate legislation. She
asked for permission to distribute the final draft and work with all of the parties involved.
Councillor Leadston suggested that the entire matter be deferred to an October meeting of the
Finance and Administration Committee and in the interim Ms. Arnold coordinate a meeting of all
the parties involved. Councillor Stortz suggested that this meeting should include the individuals
making presentations this date as well as Council representation. In regard to the latter he
volunteered both himself and Councillor Ziegler. Councillor Leadston also indicated that he would
be willing to attend the meetings on behalf of Council. Councillor Stortz added that such a meeting
does not preclude Council from instituting interim measures to control vicious dogs. Councillor
Ziegler spoke in favour of interim measures, one of which would require that all leashes be
reduced in length from ten feet to five feet.
CHAPTER 530 (DOGS) - MUNICIPAL CODE CONT'D
FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 197 1994
On a motion by Councillor B. Stortz,
It was resolved:
- 80 -
CITY OF KITCHENER
"That the Assistant City Solicitor coordinate a meeting involving
representatives of all parties in attendance at the September 19, 1994
Finance and Administration Committee meeting relative to proposed
amendments to Chapter 530 (Dogs) of the City's Municipal Code as it relates
to vicious dogs in order to consider the opinions put forward at the meeting,
and,
That Councillors B. Stortz, G. Leadston and J. Ziegler represent Council in
this regard, and further,
That a report in this regard to available for consideration at the October 17,
1994 Finance and Administration Committee."
Moved by Councillor J. Ziegler
"That the following interim steps be implemented immediately and be revisited once a
more indepth report is received from the Study Committee appointed by the Finance and
Administration Committee on September 19, 1994:
That all retractable leashes be banned;
That all required leashes be no more than five feet in length;
That all breeds identified as dangerous to the public, or dogs who otherwise
demonstrate a propensity to attack, be muzzled at all times when in public,
with these breeds to include Pitbulls, Rottweilers, German Shepherds,
Dobermans and Chow Chows."
Councillor Lorentz indicated that he supports tougher leash laws, but pointed out that being on a
leash does not always mean that the dog is controlled. He also indicated that the issue of
enforcement relative to dogs running a large should be addressed and that the second offense
should result in an automatic summons. He also asked that the issue of additional insurance also
be dealt with this date.
Councillor Ziegler asked that his motion be dealt with in three separate parts.
The motion by Councillor J. Ziegler to ban retractable leashes was voted on and Lost.
The motion by Councillor J. Ziegler to legislate a five foot leash was voted on and Lost.
The motion by Councillor J. Ziegler to require muzzling of dangerous dogs and dogs who have
shown a propensity to attack was voted on and Lost.
On a motion by Councillor M. Wagner,
It was resolved:
"That the City recommend to the Humane Society that they issue a summons
to dog owners for the second and subsequent offenses involving dogs found
at large in the municipality, and further,
That recognizing the Court's jurisdiction and discretion as regards the levying
of fines, and noting that the present by-law makes provision for a maximum
fine of $5,000.00, Kitchener Council recommend to the courts that the fines
for dogs running at large be increased with each subsequent offense."
CHAPTER 530 (DOGS) - MUNICIPAL CODE CONT'D
On a motion by Councillor G. Lorentz,
It was resolved:
"That Chapter 530 (Dogs) of the Municipal Code be amended to reflect that
FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 197 1994 - 81 - CITY OF KITCHENER
once a dog is found to be "vicious", the owner of such dog will be required to
obtain and maintain in force a policy of public liability insurance providing a
minimum of $1,000,000.00 third party liability coverage for any damage or
injury caused by the dog, and that this coverage take the form of a rider to a
homeowner or tenant policy, and further,
That the owner of a vicious dog be required to muzzle the animal when in
public."
Moved by Councillor G. Lorentz
"That Chapter 530 (Dogs) of the Municipal Code be amended to reflect that dogs must be
leashed either when leaving an owner's property or if on the property, with no appropriate
fencing of other containment."
Ms. Arnold clarified that the Municipal Act gives the City the authority to require a leash when the
dog is off of private property. Councillor Stortz indicated that he supports the intent, however, this
may not be reasonable given the current legislation.
On a motion by Councillor M. Yantzi,
It was resolved:
"That the issue of mandatory leashing of vicious dogs on public and/or
private property be referred to the working group struck by the Finance and
Administration Committee on September 19, 1994 to consider amendments
to Chapter 530 (Dogs)."
3. BUDGET REALLOCATION REQUEST - FIRE DEPARTMENT
The Committee was in receipt of a memorandum from Deputy Fire Chief N. Kuntz dated
September 6, 1994 recommending a transfer of funds to offset budget shortfalls in the areas
Safety Equipment and Training.
On a motion by Councillor G. Lorentz,
It was resolved:
"That the Fire Department be authorized to transfer funds between the Salary
Surplus, the Safety Equipment and the Training Division accounts to offset
an anticipated budget shortfall of approximately $55,000.00 all in accordance
with the memorandum from Deputy Fire Chief N. Kuntz dated September 6,
1994."
4. COST VALUATION DISAGREEMENT - HOMEOWNER BUILT PROJECTS
The Committee was in receipt of Report No. PD 94/93 from Mr. J. Witmer and Mr. T. McCabe
recommending changes to Chapter 710 (Building - Permits and Fees) of the Municipal Code
concerning procedures relative to cost valuation disagreement and provision for a revised fee and
refund.
4. COST VALUATION DISAGREEMENT - HOMEOWNER BUILT PROJECTS CONT'D
On a motion by Councillor J. Ziegler,
It was resolved:
"That the City Clerk amend Section 710.8.7 (Revised Fee - Refund) and
Section 710.8.8 (Cost - Valuation Disagreement) of Chapter 710 (Building -
Permits and Fees) of the Kitchener Municipal Code as outlined in Staff
FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 197 1994 - 82 -
Report No. PD 94/93 dated September 12, 1994."
CITY OF KITCHENER
5. LEASE AND OPERATING AGREEMENTS - PROJECT LIFT INC.
The Committee was in receipt of a memorandum from Mr. J. Shivas and draft agreements
involving the lease of vehicles to Project Lift Inc. and their operation.
Councillor Yantzi inquired whether natural gas had been investigated as a fuel for Project Lift
vehicles and Mr. McKay indicated that he would look into the matter.
On a motion by Councillor C. Weylie,
It was resolved:
"That the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute a lease agreement dated
April 13, 1994 between the City and Project Lift Inc. and an operating
agreement dated April 13, 1994 between the City, the City of Waterloo and
Project Lift Inc. respecting special transit service."
6. TOWN OF OAKVILLE RESOLUTION - CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The Committee was in receipt of a report and supplementary information from Mr. R.W. Pritchard
dated September 1, 1994 concerning a request from Oakville that Kitchener support its position
concerning proposed amendments to Conflict of Interest and Planning legislation. Consideration
of this item was referred by City Council on August 22, 1994.
Councillor Ziegler suggested that at minimum the City should endorse the Oakville resolution. In
referring to proposed amendments to the Conflict of Interest legislation Councillor Ziegler
suggested that the form of disclosure which would be required involving the financial assets of
candidates would discourage people from running for office. In addition, such disclosures would
contain third party information. Mr. McKay advised that the proposed legislation had been
debated extensively at a recent Association of Municipalities of Ontario conference. He noted that
delegates were generally opposed to the proposed amendments, but took particular exception to
the fact that the municipal legislation would not be implemented in a manner similar to its
Provincial counterpart. It was noted that it is likely there would be a gatekeeper to control
disclosure of such information to the public.
A brief discussion took place concerning the necessity of leaving a public meeting once a conflict
of interest had been declared and the impact on this on public representatives.
On a motion by Councillor J. Ziegler,
It was resolved:
"That the City of Kitchener endorse the August 8, 1994 resolution of the
Council of the Corporation of the Town of Oakville concerning Bill 163, an Act
to revise the Ontario Planning and Development Act and the Municipal
Conflict of Interest Act, to amend the Planning Act and the Municipal Act and
to amend other statutes related to planning and municipal matters, as
outlined in correspondence from Ms. C. Shewchuk, Assistant Clerk, dated
August 9, 1994."
7. ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPALITIES OF ONTARIO - INDUSTRY PROPOSAL FOR FUNDING
MUNICIPAL RECYCLING PROGRAMMES
The Committee was in receipt of a report and recommendation from Mr. T.
September 7, 1994 concerning the Association's draft position on the funding
recycling in Ontario.
On a motion by Councillor G. Lorentz,
It was resolved:
"That the City of Kitchener request the Regional Municipality of Waterloo to
McKay dated
of packaging
FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 197 1994 - 83 - CITY OF KITCHENER
review the Association of Municipalities of Ontario's (AMO) draft position on
an industry proposal for funding municipal recycling programs and to respond
to the AMO on behalf of all municipalities within the Region."
8. RELIEF FROM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES PAYMENT - ROSEMOUNT DRIVE
The Committee was in receipt of Report No. PD 94/83 from Mr. J. Witmer and Mr. T. McCabe
concerning an application for reimbursement of development charges relative to construction of
two single detached dwellings on Rosemount Drive.
Mr. Witmer advised that the owner is very frustrated by the process and feels she has been
unfairly hindered in developing the property. He noted that the lots were approved for
development by the City, with approvals being twice appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board. He
noted that staff feel there should be no exemptions from development charges, and that awarding
the grant as requested would set an ill-advised precedent. Councillor Leadston advised that over
the years a number of individuals have been prepared to develop the site, and that no one in the
residential community adjacent to the property objected to one of the proposals involving a medical
building. He added that the interested party was not willing to go through the approval process
necessary to construct the building.
On a motion by Councillor J. Ziegler,
It was resolved:
"That no action be taken on the request from the owners of Lots 12 and 13,
Registered Plan 937, for a grant in the amount of $9,628.00, being the
amount of development charges applicable for construction of two single
detached dwellings on the subject properties."
9. LONG TERM FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND TAXATION STRATEGY
The Committee was in receipt of a report from Mr. T. McKay dated September 14, 1994
recommending various changes with respect to the Mill Rate Stabilization Fund and the three City
enterprises.
Mr. McKay referred to his report indicating that it was written as a result of last year's budget
approval process. He noted that other options for addressing the issue would involve increased
taxes and/or a drastic reduction in services. He expressed confidence that with an increase in tax
revenues and implementation of productivity improvements, the City could reduce its reliance on
the Mill Rate Stabilization Fund.
Councillor Zehr noted that he had spoken with Mr. Gazzola concerning the recommendations, who
indicated his preference would be to deal with the situation more conservatively. Councillor
Ziegler questioned whether it was appropriate to use money from the Mill Rate Stabilization Fund
to finance the parking deficit. Mr. McKay replied that all three enterprises are independent, and if
it is appropriate to redirect a surplus to the Fund then it is equally appropriate to use the surplus to
reduce the deficits in other enterprises. Mr. McKay also emphasized that the recommended
financial strategies do not imply that the City can operate without a tax increase from 1995 to the
year 2000.
9. LONG TERM FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND TAXATION STRATEGY CONT'D
On a motion by Councillor B. Stortz,
It was resolved:
"That Council implement the recommended actions in the report of Mr. T.
McKay dated September 14, 1994 relative to replenishing the Mill Rate
Stabilization Fund and adoption of a financial management strategy that will,
over time, decrease and eliminate the City's dependency on contributions
from the Fund."
10. SPORTS HALL OF FAME - 122 FREDERICK STREET
FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 197 1994 - 84 - CITY OF KITCHENER
The Committee received as information a report from Mr. R. Arnot dated September 14, 1994
concerning progress to date on negotiations with the Canadian Curling Association, Softball
Canada and Swim Ontario.
11. OTHER BUSINESS - CITY INSURANCE POLICY
Councillor Zehr asked whether the City's current policy addresses the area of liable, and Mr.
McKay indicated that he would investigate and report to Council.
12. OTHER BUSINESS -AIR RAID SIREN - LIPPS PARK
Councillor Stortz advised of a recent incident involving a faulty air raid siren which sounded during
the early morning hours of Saturday, September 17, 1994. He asked that staff respond with a
protocol from Nation Defense as regards responding to this type of incident. He also asked for a
validation of the necessity of such sirens given recent changes in international affairs. Mayor
Cardillo indicated that he would take the request under advisement, and Councillor Stortz
repeated his request that a report be prepared by staff for consideration at the next Council
meeting.
13. OTHER BUSINESS - REDUCTION IN THE NUMBER OF WARDS AND SIZE OF CITY
COUNCIL
The City was in receipt of a draft question prepared by Mayor Cardillo for the 1994 Municipal
Election Ballot. Councillor Ziegler suggested that the question be amended so as to ask whether
the number of Wards and Ward Councillors should be reduced, and Mayor Cardillo agreed to
incorporate the suggestion. He also asked that Councillor G. Leadston, who is not a member of
the Finance and Administration Committee, be allowed to vote on this issue.
Moved by Mayor D.V. Cardillo
"That the following question be placed on the 1994 Municipal Election Ballot:
'Should the number of Wards and the size of City Council be reduced from
the Mayor and ten Ward Councillors to the Mayor and eight Ward
Councillors?'."
Councillor Yantzi reminded the Committee that the task force reviewing Regional government will
look into the issue of representation, and questioned why the City would involve itself before the
study is completed. Councillor Weylie suggested that this issue should be dealt with after the
Province decides on how Regional Council will be elected. Councillors Leadston, Stortz and Zehr
indicated that consideration at this time was premature, and that the issue should be left at present
with the Regional Task Force. Councillor Galloway indicated his support of the Mayor's proposal.
A brief discussion also took place concerning representation by the City of Kitchener on Regional
Council.
13. OTHER BUSINESS - REDUCTION IN THE NUMBER OF WARDS AND SIZE OF CITY
COUNCIL CONT'D
Mayor Cardillo advised that the ballot question is one method of allowing public input, and that any
resulting changes would not be implemented until the 1997 election. He noted that in 1960 there
were sixteen Members of Council and that reducing the number of elected officials as proposed
would result in further savings of approximately $44,000.00 a year. He also indicated his intention
to approach the issue via petition in the event his recommendation is not endorsed by the
Committee.
The previous motion by Mayor D.V. Cardillo to place a question on the 1994 Municipal Election
Ballot concerning the number of Wards and the size of City Council was voted on and Lost.
14. NEXT MEETING
FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 197 1994 - 85 - CITY OF KITCHENER
The next regularly scheduled meeting of the Finance and Administration Committee will be held on
Monday, October 3, 1994.
15. ADJOURNMENT
On motion, the meeting adjourned at 1:20 p.m.
G. Sosnoski
Manager of Corporate
Records/Assistant City Clerk