HomeMy WebLinkAboutEnv Agenda - 2019-02-21Environmental Committee
Agenda
Thursday, February 21, 2019
Office of the City Clerk
4:00p.m.-6:00 p.m.
Kitchener City Hall
nd
200 King St.W. - 2 Floor
Conestoga Room
Kitchener ON N2G 4G7
Page 1Chair Tia DriverVice-Chair Alison Gingrich Regehr
Delegations
-law, delegations are permitted to address the Committee for a maximumof
5 minutes.
Item 1 - Derek Satnik, s2e Technologies Development Inc.
Discussion Items
1. Net Zero Energy Feasibility Study (45 min)
Brandon Sloan, Manager, Long Range & Policy Planning
2.All Advisory Committee Meeting -
Preliminary 2019-2022 Draft Goal Statements and Example Actions(20 min)
3.New 2019-2020 Environmental Committee Work Plan(55 min)
Information Items
None
Cody Boomer
CommitteeAdministrator
** Accessible formats and communication supports are available upon request. If you require assistance to
take part in a city meeting or event, please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1866-969-9994 **
REPORT TO:EnvironmentalCommittee
DATE OF MEETING:February 21, 2019
SUBMITTED BY:Brandon Sloan, Manager, Long Range & Policy Planning
PREPARED BY:Brandon Sloan, Manager, Long Range& Policy Planning
519-741-2200 ext. 7648
WARD(S) INVOLVED:All Wards
DATE OF REPORT:February 8, 2019
REPORT NO.:DSD-19-031
SUBJECT:FCM/GMF Feasibility Study:
Municipal Tools for Catalyzing Net-Zero Energy Development
RECOMMENDATION:
FCM/GMF Feasibility Study: Municipal Tools for
Catalyzing Net-Zero Energy Development
interested stakeholders; and further
That the results of the -
to conduct specific business cases,establish targets and
engage with landowners for one or more pilot projects for:
Areas undergoing significant redevelopment, such as the King/Victoria area
The planning of new communities or neighbourhoods
Other City-owned land that may be deemed surplus and available for development
BACKGROUND:
In 1984, the City of Kitchener adopted Official Plan policies regarding energy conservation and
generation related to our urban form (see attached Appendix A). Thirty-five years later, the
feasibility of constructing a development in our area that is so energy efficient that it approaches
-(FCM)
identified that the building industry and et-Zero construction is one of the most powerful
opportunities to create environmental and economic benefit, and that municipalities should play
a leadership role in helping the industry to adapt to Net-Zero Energy construction.
The City of Kitchener partnered with the Cities of London, Waterloo and Kingston on a Feasibility
Study that received a grant from FCM via the Green Municipal Fund. While there are numerous
examples of low energy or sustainable developments throughout the world (and now some
buildings in our region including evolv1), we needed to
know more about the technologies, financial aspects and process improvements that could help
-t at the neighbourhood or large redevelopment scale.
*** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. ***
Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance.
1 - 1
What is Net ZeroEnergy Development?
Net-Zero Energy: -
produces all the energy it consumes on an annual basis, from on-site resources which are
renewable. The building / project may or may not be connected to a utility grid or energy
storage system. It will have means to generate energy on site, and it will have means to
access and use that energy over time not necessarily exactly when it was generated.
Net-Zero Energy Building: A building which produces as much energy (including
both electrical power and heat) as it consumes on a yearly basis.
Net-Zero Energy Community: A community which produces as much energy as it
consumes on a yearly basis. Some buildings will likely generate more energy than
others, but as a community, they will together offset their combined annual energy
demand.
Figure 1: SiftonProperties Limited-The Future of Housing | West5(London, ON) www.West5.ca
REPORT:
Feasibility Study
The in-progress development in the City of London shown in Figure 1 above, along with many
other projects and municipal initiatives, inspired the preparation of a joint study to provide
municipalities with additional information and a tool-kit for catalyzing Net-Zero Energy
buildings and communities. Over the past two years, a consultant team has compiled a
significant amount of information on the design strategies, practices employed by others,
policies and programs, and financial strategies related to this topic. A series of case-studies
in each of the partnering municipalities covered a range of contextual issues and resulted in
a number of trends and key findings. The concluding aspects of the study provide technical,
financial and policy directions for how we can work towards Net-Zero Energy Development.
Note: The scope of the study is net--
1 - 2
Appendix B to this report provides an Executive Summary of the in-depth, comprehensive
study and related appendices. Through the analysis of the case studies, this helped to
summarize the technologies that enable Net-Zero Energy at the community scale,
summarize the financial and incentive models that may be pertinent, analyze the challenges
that were encountered and resulted in a consolidation of findings and recommendations. The
preliminary results of the full study are posted at: https://s2etech.com/fcm-gmf/. The key
recommendations offered for municipalities include:
Benchmarking District Energy
Training Community Improvement Plan
Continuous Learning Celebrate
Consider Solar Right-to-Light
Implications for Kitchener
Currently, there is policy direction for more sustainable development, such as Net-Zero
Energy development. Governments are working to develop and adopt increasingly energy
efficient building requirements, with the goal that prov-Zero
E.
The Net-Zero Energy Feasibility Study enumerates the tools available for municipalities and
developers to pursue implementation at the neighbourhood scale. For the City of Kitchener,
two distinct case studies were examined a major, urban area redevelopment site within the
Innovation District and a greenfield demonstration site. The results provide guidance for what
technologies could be employed and what adjustments would be needed in order to get close
to or achieve Net-Zero Energy in both instances. Of interest is that there may be less
challenges within a new-build, greenfield context.
Given that there are prime opportunities in the vicinity of King/Victoria and other prospects
either as part of major, redevelopment sites such as the former Schneiders/Maple Leaf Foods
site or new areas undergoing Secondary Plans such as Hidden Valley and the new
Southwest Kitchener Urban Area we should pursue the next steps of implementing the policy
direction and feasibility study. Situations with single land holders may be more challenging;
however, with 3rd party energy provider/operators and where the City owns land there may
be greater potential for success. In addition to energy efficiency, locations such as the
Innovation District and surrounding sites would also be able to achieve a greater degree of
The Feasibility Study provides a sample Community Improvement Plan (CIP) as a
recommendation for municipalities to consider should financial incentive program(s) be a
The existing, unfunded City of Kitchener Energy and Water Efficiency for Land and Buildings
point in the future, the City may want to consider potentially funding a program under that
CIP.
1 - 3
Relation to Other Initiatives
projects, provide policy basis and master plan direction to work towards more sustainable
development. This Feasibility Study now provides us with the needed information about the
technologies, financial aspects and process issues. The environment and sustainability
continue to always be themes within Environics Surveys, community priorities and Strategic
Plans. Kitchener and our partner municipalities have an approved Community Climate Action
Plan and adopted a community GHG reduction target to 2050. We also have co-funded the
implementation of the approved Community Energy Investment Strategy. This Net-Zero
Energy Feasibility Study aligns with these important climate change and energy initiatives
and moves us closer to implementation. Now we just have to do it.
ALIGNMENT WITH CITY OF KITCHENER STRATEGIC PLAN:
Strategic Priority #4 Sustainable Environment and Infrastructure
Business Plan Project #NB13 Sustainable Development Feasibility Study
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Fund and the partnership of the City of London, City of Kitchener, City of Waterloo, and City of
account.
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT:
INFORM This report will the
Committee meeting.
This study involved internal and inter-municipal collaboration.
CONCLUSION:
Kitchener is fairly well-positioned to move towards more sustainable development, such as Net-
Zero Energy. Developers in the City of London are currently doing it. Through this, and the
implementation of the Community Energy Investment Strategy, we need to engage further with
the local utilities and the development industry to consider the technologies, finances and
logistics. Local energy independence and reducing environmental impacts while still having
positive economic development is within reach. This can help enhance our quality of life.
We have the mandate, so pursuing one or more pilot projects is recommended as a next step.
ACKNOWLEDGED BY: Alain Pinard, Director of Planning
ATTACHMENTS:
Appendix A Energy Policies (1977 Official Plan, as amended in 1984)
Appendix B Executive Summary FCM/GMF Feasibility Study: Municipal Tools for Catalyzing
Net-Zero Energy Development
1 - 4
1 - 5
1 - 6
1 - 7
1 - 8
APPENDIX BFCM/GMF Feasibility Study:
Municipal Tools for Catalyzing Net-Zero Energy Development
municipalities and developers alike. It is easier today than ever before to build communities which
provide all of their own energy needs and which leverage smart and sustainable design principles.
Most current planning and development processes within municipalities do not fully support the
implementation of such initiatives, which often involve technical and financial complexities that
can cause delays with the municipal approvals processes, and which thus become dis-incentives
against pursuing more sustainable construction.
To address this and related challenges, this study will look at eight different development projects
as case studies at diverse stages across four mid-sized growing cities in Ontario (two projects per
city), evaluating what would be necessary in order to enable the project to provide all of its own
energy on-site, by assessing three complementary and interdependent focusses:
Technical Feasibility: This study will look at different technologies used in advanced energy-
efficient buildings and communities and will assess which are feasible for widespread use today,
what types of projects each technology is best suited for, and what technologies can be used to
achieve net-zero energy performance in each of the eight chosen cases.
Financial Feasibility: This study will evaluate funding and incentive models which can be used
to offset the costs of including advanced technologies that help attain net-zero energy on the
neighbourhood / community scale.
Policy / Process Feasibility: This study will involve shadow-permitting discussions, where each
partner municipality will participate in a mock-trial approval process. Each project will be
conceptually redesigned to achieve net-zero energy, and the cities will be asked to assess and
contribute their understanding of what would be required for them to issue construction approvals
for the design concepts being studied. This will help to identify policy and process challenges
and proactive means by which those challenges may be resolved.
Interestingly, much of the challenge with building better is based on the assumption that this must
cost more. In reality, the technology markets (like solar PV and LED lighting) and the best-in-
class building programs (like ENERGY STAR, LEED, and others) have enjoyed tremendous
success over the past ten years, and costs are much more reasonable than they were previously.
This is likely to become even more true with the implementation of new climate action strategies
at the Federal and Provincial levels. However, these technologies and programs are still new to
city officials and developers, and it can be challenging to get a building permit for a building that
is innovative.
The eight project sites included in this study together represent a sufficiently diverse pool of cases
that they are generally representative of most of the development scenarios that municipalities
typically experience, and will therefore provide a highly transferrable and repeatable set of results
for use not only by the participating partners (who will of course benefit the most), but also for all
other Canadian municipalities.
1 - 9
Results:
This report includes a series of case studies and appendices which:
1. Summarize the technologies that enable net-zero energy at the community or
neighbourhood level for various types of project sites, with some guidance about where
those technologies are best used and where they are not;
2. Summarize the financial and incentive models that have been used across Canada, with
comments on their relative strengths and weaknesses, and with comments about how
municipalities can provide cost effective incentives that maximize returns for the tax base,
while also maximizing effectiveness for the development industry;
3. Analyze the challenges encountered during the permit and approvals process for
advanced construction designs, and offer comment on proactive ways which municipalities
can reduce and eliminate as many barriers as possible, streamlining administrative
processes;
4. Consolidate the above findings into a template policy in the form of a Community
Improvement Plan (CIP) with accompanying enablement programs, which could be
adapted and adopted in part or in whole by any Canadian municipality, particularly those
in Ontario, and which would serve as a consolidated best-practice reference guide of
incentive programs that may be used to catalyze the development of net-zero energy smart
communities across Canada.
This study is intended to provide the development industry with municipal support that is effective.
It will help site owners to understand how to effectively and affordably make their developments
more sustainable, and will provide them with examples they may adapt to their own use. The eight
participating sites will be provided with practical support from s2e Technologies in identifying
which technologies and strategies will best enable their projects to pursue net-zero energy
performance, and the development industry in general will benefit from the generalized results of
the case studies. The eight participating projects will further benefit from process / policy support
from the participating municipalities, which should enable proactive resolution to challenges that
might otherwise be encountered during the permitting and approvals process.
Recommendations for Municipalities
The report offers several conclusions across technical / financial / process topics, and culminates
with a set of seven recommendations for municipalities to consider:
1. Benchmark: Assess the capabilities of your local industry. Identify key stakeholders
among builders, suppliers, non-profits and others who are respected local leaders,
innovators, and potential advisors to the municipality.
2. Training: After reviewing this report, especially chapters 3 and 4, consider what training
might be necessary for your municipal staff, and what topics might be most helpful for
them to understand better.
1 - 10
3. Continuous Learning: Adopt a formalized continuous learning program for municipal
staff. Capture lessons and experiences as they occur: consider scheduling periodic meetings
(perhaps quarterly) to discuss lessons and experiences from recent projects or activities.
Document them formally and adapt municipal process (as appropriate) in response.
first on these learnings and then perhaps on review of various technologies from chapter 3
of this report.
4. Consider implementing a Solar Right-To-Light bylaw to help reduce risk for developers
who are considering investing in solar systems on properties affected by potential nearby
redevelopment / intensification.
5. District Energy: Consider implementing any of the solutions in Appendix C: Enabling
Policy for District Energy, to proactively define a method by which district energy
proponents can participate in local energy markets.
6. CIP: Review the draft Community Improvement Plan included in Appendix D, including
all of the proposed programs attached to that plan. Adapt it for your local context and
implement the p
mindful of the observations and recommendations of section 4.7 starting on page 112 (eg:
about program stability, simplicity, target audience, setting reasonable expectations, etc.),
and of the strengths of your local industry (refer to recommendation 1 above on
benchmarking). Refine this draft CIP into something for use in your local municipality,
and then review with local stakeholders. Programs in this CIP do not need to be funded
immediately, and discussions of funding method should not delay a discussion on what
programs will be most helpful for your local municipality: separate those discussions into
two efforts and focus on getting the CIP adapted and adopted as quickly as possible. Then
follow up with budget discussions separately for the following fiscal year, to bring the CIP
into full force.
7. Celebrate: Establish a local marketing plan. Work with local stakeholders to determine
what level of publicity is appropriate for your local green building programs, and to identify
appropriate methods for recognition.
Municipalities who implement the recommendations of this study will be well positioned to help
the development industry transition towards net-zero energy construction, increasing local energy
independence, catalyzing local economic development, reducing environmental impact and
emissions, supporting environmental conservation, and enhancing quality of life.
1 - 11
2 - 1
2 - 2
2 - 3
2 - 4
2 - 5
2 - 6
1
-
3
in Kelly,
Responsibility Councillor Yvonne FernandesErin Kelly John Jackson, ErCynthia Gaetani, Tia Driver
Staff Contact Josh Shea, Natural Area CoordinatorJosh Shea, Natural Area Coordinator 1. Nick Gollan, Manager of Stormwater Utility 2. Linda Cooper, Manager of Development Engineering
3. Other
going going
--
Timeframe Ad hoc, onthroughout yearAd hoc, onthroughout year 2018
Recurs Annually
Discrete
Project Type
3
Kitchener's
of
1
)
Page
)
Description of Tasks Assist with research, the development of management plans for natural areas and stewardship activities for / in natural areas. Attend KNAP meetings and events. Act
as liaison to seek input from and report back to Environmental Committee.Liaison to sit on Kitchener's Bee City Working Group and report back to, and seek advice as necessary from,
Environmental Committee.1. Canvas Stormwater Utility staff to assess opportunities to help promote Low Impact Development retrofits and the stormwater credit policy in neighbourhoods.
2. Consider how erosion and sedimentation control (ESC) on construction sites might be improved. 3. Etc.
{ƷƩğƷĻŭźĭ tƌğƓ ŅƚƩ ƷŷĻ 9ƓǝźƩƚƓƒĻƓƷ
2018
-
{ƷƩğƷĻŭźĭ tƌğƓ ŅƚƩ ƷŷĻ 9ƓǝźƩƚƓƒĻƓƷ
Kitchener Working Group
Project Kitchener Natural Areas ProgramBee City Water Management Stewardship
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITTEE WORK PLAN 2017 No.Kitchener Natural Heritage System (Theme 1 of the 1.11.2 Water Resources (Theme 2 of the 2.1
2
-
ndes,
3
Responsibility Councillor Yvonne FernaEdward Saxon, Jordan Gray, John Jackson Committee Stacey Danckert, Edward Saxon,Tia Driver
-
Staff Contact Barbara Steiner, Senior Environmental Planner (initially) Brandon Sloan, Manager, Long Range & Policy Planning (Tasks 12)Mike Seiling, Director of Building (Task 3)
18.
-
18).
2018
-
-
Timeframe To Be Determined Post Green Development Guidelines being considered as part of the new Urban Design Manual project in 2017Consider incorporating the diversion of construction
waste into these or other guidelines (i.e. 2017
Project Type
3
of
2
Page
wide campaigns (Regional
-
with Planning and Building staff
Description of Tasks Brainstorm ideas: "green driving" tips; former RegionPublic Health, WPIRG, area municipalities); exisitng City of Kitchener initiatives (e.g. fleet policies and
practices; signage in school zones) for strengthening message to public.Update to be considered by the whole committee during a regular meeting as an agenda item. 1. Consultto determine
if current policies and practices are supportive; 2. Determine feasibility, next steps and how the Environmental Committee can be involved; 3. With respect to diverting construction
waste, meet with Buildingstaff to determine current situation, and potential future actions.
2018
)
))
-
reduction
Idling Education
-
{ƷƩğƷĻŭźĭ tƌğƓ ŅƚƩ ƷŷĻ ĻƓǝźƩƚƓƒĻƓƷ{ƷƩğƷĻŭźĭ tƌğƓ ŅƚƩ ƷŷĻ 9ƓǝźƩƚƓƒĻƓƷ{ƷƩğƷĻŭźĭ tƌğƓ ŅƚƩ ƷŷĻ 9ƓǝźƩƚƓƒĻƓƷ
Project AntiKitchener Growth Management StrategySupport the application of a rating system such as LEED for existing and new private sector projects or in site/building redevelopments.Encourage
the diversion of construction waste from landfills, and waste tools for new development and redevelopment project
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITTEE WORK PLAN 2017 No.Air Quality (Theme 3 of the 3.1 Land Resource and Growth Management(Theme 4 of the 4.1 Energy Systems (Theme 5 of the 5.1 (formerly 3.2 and
6.2)Resource Consumption and Waste Management ΛŷĻƒĻ Џ ƚŅ ƷŷĻ {ƷƩğƷĻŭźĭ tğƓ ŅƚƩ ƷŷĻ 9ƓǝźƩƚƓƒĻƓƷΜ
3
-
3
ments for
Responsibility Jordan Gray, Katarina Milicic, Tia Driver, Erin Kelly Stacey Danckert, Tina Belanger, Edward SaxonDefer
Musselman,
Determined
ference
Staff Contact Josh Shea, Natural Area CoordinatorTo Be(dependent on type of event)Carrie Senior Environmental PlannerJeff YoungManager, Special Events"
-
-
ring this forward for discussion by the whole
hoc,
-
Timeframe September January each yearAdthroughout year.October November each yearDefer start pending committee interest and capacity
Project Type
in an
3
of
3
backing on another
Page
-
ITEMS OF INTEREST
Review methodology for annual report card. Staff to b
conference) meeting with
-
-
Description of Tasks Plan Environmental Committee event for Earth Day.Members organize or participateevent related to the mandate of the committee. Consider partnering with another citizen
advisory committee such as KYAC and/or piggyevent such as BikeFest. Research suitable events as a 1st step.Detailed application review and recommendation of successful grantees. One
(telesubcommittee.Meet with the Managers of Special Events and Downtown Community Development to determine current situation, and potential future actions.
-
2018
-
Request Purchasing staff to describe current situation and potential for policy change to greener standards including require
9ƓǝźƩƚƓƒĻƓƷΜ
-
Policy
100)
-
he Strategic Plan for the Environment
Project Environmental Events Community Environmental Improvement Grants (CEIG)Work with City staff to develop and/or implement a Green Festival Strategy for Citymanaged events and examine
the possibility of applying it to third party events.Provide advice or information on environmental matters referred to the committee by Council and staff as per: the Terms of Re(Council
Policy I Green Purchasing minimal packaging. 2. Strategic Plan for the Environment committee.
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITTEE WORK PLAN 2017 No.Environmental Education and Public Awareness ΛŷĻƒĻ А ƚŅ ƷŷĻ {ƷƩğƷĻŭźĭ tƌğƓ ŅƚƩ ƷŷĻ 7.17.27.3 Multiple Themes of t 8.11.