Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFinance & Admin - 1996-08-06FAC\1996-08-06 AUGUST 6, 1996 FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MINUTES CITY OF KITCHENER The Finance and Administration Committee met this date commencing at 10.05 a.m. under the Chairmanship of Councillor J. Ziegler with the following members present: Councillors T. Galloway, Jake Smola, John Smola, M. Wagner, M. Yantzi, C. Weylie, B. Vrbanovic, K. Redman and J. Lorentz. Mayor R. Christy was in attendance for part of the meeting. Others present: Ms. L. MacDonald, Mrs. J. Koppeser, Messrs. R. W. Pritchard, J. Gazzola, T. McCabe, L. Parkhouse, J. Shivas, D. Mansell, S. Gyorffy, B. Stanley, T. Clancy, D. Corks, J. McBride, W. Pearce and G. Sosnoski. 1. REQUEST FOR SHARING OF SUMP PUMP - (239 ERINBROOK DRIVE) The Committee was in receipt of a memorandum from Councillor T. Galloway dated July 26, 1996 outlining a request from Mr. Barry Gascon for compensation relative to retrofitting of a sump pump at his home. Councillor Galloway recommended that the City pay 50% of the total cost of $875.00 plus taxes. Mr. Barry Gascon appeared and referred to instances of flooding in his basement. He noted that the builder initially told him a sump pump was not required due to soil conditions, notwithstanding the fact that neighbouring homes had pumps installed at the time of construction. Mr. Gascon offered the opinion that an error had been made and asked the City of partially compensate him for the installation as per Councillor Galloway's recommendation. He further explained that the work is not covered under the HUDAC warranty and the builder is no longer in business. Councillor Galloway explained that drainage at the site is correct; however, an engineering report indicated that a sump pump would not be required. He offered the opinion that the engineering firm (Petro-McCallum), hired by the City to undertake soil testing, had erred in its judgement as to the need for a pump. Councillor Galloway put forward a motion that the City pay 50% of the retrofitting costs and contact Petro-McCallum to request their participation. Mr. Shivas advised of the need to consider all of the facts before arriving at a decision, and cautioned against prematurely assuming responsibility. Councillor Redman enquired how this type of situation has been handled in the past and Mr. Witmer stated that when staff make an error they admit it and assist where possible; however, in this instance advised he did not feel that the City was at fault and should not assume financial responsibility. Mr. Shivas further cautioned that pursuing the engineering firm for partial payment of the claim would be precedent setting. On a motion by Councillor M. Yantzi it was resolved: "That consideration of the request of Mr. B. Gascon for compensation relating to the installation of a sump pump at 239 Erinbrook Drive be deferred and referred to the September 9, 1996 meeting of the Finance and Administration Committee pending receipt of additional information from staff." 2. ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT - 273 KING STREET WEST The Committee was in receipt of a report from L. MacDonald dated July 18, 1996 recommending execution of an encroachment agreement involving a second storey balcony. Mr. Corks introduced the encroachment application noting that the design of the balcony requires that two pillars be set in the sidewalk with the balcony itself extending between 3 and 4 feet over the sidewalk. It was also noted that the business owns approximately 5 feet of the sidewalk, but that the footings would extend onto City property. Mayor R. Christy entered the meeting at this time. Councillor Jake Smola expressed concern over the impact the balcony would have on the streetscape given the narrow width of King Street, and the possibility of similar future requests. He also expressed concern over the aesthetic impact and the possibility of pedestrian FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MINUTES AUGUST 6, 1996 - 101 - CITY OF KITCHENER ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT - 273 KING STREET WEST - CONT'D injury as a result of objects falling onto the sidewalk from the balcony. Mr. Corks replied that the concern over falling objects has been addressed in Toronto through the use of disposable plastics cups and cutlery. Ms. Sarah Lang, Architect, appeared on behalf of the property owner and outlined the detailed design concept. She pointed out that a European style restaurant will open on the second floor which will primarily serve food, and the proposed balcony will be for seasonal use only. She explained that the balcony cannot be cantilevered more than 3 to 6 feet into the roadway, and that a minimum of 8 feet is required. She added that the Liquor Licensing Board of Ontario requires that any glasses and cutlery be of a lightweight and disposable nature, and stressed that the balcony would not be used as a drinking establishment. Ms. Lang suggested that the proposed balcony would enliven and generally benefit the Downtown, and indicated that the owner hopes to provide additional patio space at ground floor level at a future date. Councillor Galloway questioned whether the balcony could be suspended from above, and Ms. Lang indicated that this was unlikely given the nature of the building and in any case would require the advice of a Structural Engineer. Councillor Redman pointed out that encroachment agreements in the Downtown normally have to be renewed annually and Ms. Lang acknowledged that the onus is on the owner to act responsibly in order to ensure annual renewal. In response to a further question, Mr. Corks advised that the sidewalk width between the pillars and the roadway would be between 8 and 10 feet, with the minimum width usually required being 7 feet. Councillor Vrbanovic expressed concern over the impact the posts may have on the free flow of pedestrian traffic. On a motion by Councillor C. Weylie it was resolved: "That subject to obtaining all required approvals, the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute an encroachment agreement with the registered owner(s) of the property described as Part Lot 6, Plan 375 and municipally known as 273 King Street West, to permit the construction of a second story balcony which will encroach 3 feet, more or less, over the King Street West road allowance." REGIONAL SMOKING BY-LAW The Committee was in receipt of correspondence from E. Stettner, Regional Clerk, dated June 14, 1996 outlining a resolution passed by Regional Council on June 13, 1996 concerning adoption of the proposed Regional Smoking By-law. They were also in receipt of a draft By-law with a request for comment from Kitchener Council by September 4, 1996. Mr. Brian Gingell appeared on behalf of the Council for a Tobacco Free Waterloo Region and in support of the proposed Regional By-law. He read his written submission urging Council to support the By-law and restrict smoking in public places. Mr. Gingell suggested that the By-law restrictions would offer the staff of bars and restaurants protection from the effects of second hand smoke and would diminish the influence of the smoking role model on youth. He pointed out that the public is solidly behind the By-law, as approximately 75% of residents do not smoke. Mr. Gingell pointed out that in 1992 the cost of tobacco abuse in Ontario was $3.7 billion or approximately 1/2 of the operating expenses of Ontario Hospitals. He asked that Kitchener Council support the proposed By-law. Ms. Becky Bauman appeared on behalf of Project Air Control a youth driven project intended to promote non-smoking and to address the issue of second-hand smoke from a youth perspective. Ms. Bauman circulated a written submission in this regard and urged Council to support the By-law on the basis that it affords protection to non-smokers and sends a message to youth about the dangers of smoking. Councillor Weylie suggested that Ms. Bauman convey her message to area members of the REGIONAL SMOKING BY-LAW - CONT'D Provincial Parliament and Mayor Christy encouraged similar actions regarding the School Boards. FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MINUTES AUGUST 6, 1996 - 102 - CITY OF KITCHENER Councillor Lorentz pointed out that the Regional Police are charging store owners who sell tobacco to youth under the legal age and encouraged Ms. Bauman to provide any names in this regard to Dr. Ronald Sax, Medical Officer of Health of the Region, who would pursue enforcement. Ms. Wanda Altmayer appeared and indicated she strongly supports the By-law and encourages Council to do the same. She suggested that the By-law is needed for health reasons, as business cannot be relied upon to protect people from the harmful effects of smoking. Moved by Councillor M. Wagner "That Kitchener City Council supports the draft by-law of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo to regulate smoking in public places as contained in Regional report CR-RS-96- 023 dated June 5, 1996." Councillor Wagner stated that in his opinion, smokers do not have the right to contaminate the air. He indicated the need for legislation to protect people from the effects of second-hand smoke, noting that there are approximately 34,000 tobacco related deaths in Canada annually. He referred to the By-law as expedient and acceptable, though not as aggressive as some other municipalities, and urged Council to support it. Councillor Redman expressed concern over the hardship provisions as outlined in clause 7 of the By-law, but indicated she had no better suggestion at this time. Councillor Yantzi indicated his support, and indicated his preference that the municipality move more quickly toward a smoke-free environment in public places. He indicated his belief that smokers would adjust to the restriction. Councillor Galloway expressed concerns over the hardship exemptions and indicated that these may build false expectations. He also expressed concern over enforcement of the By-law, noting that it is likely that some owners would not comply. Councillor Galloway indicated his disappointment with the Provincial government's inaction in this matter and suggested that they have abdicated their responsibility in this regard due to the implications due to a strong tobacco lobby. He offered the opinion that this is clearly a Ministry of Health issue. In response to a further question concerning enforcement of the By-law, Dr. Ronald Sax, Medical Officer of Health, Region of Waterloo, advised that 20 staff members are designated for tobacco enforcement under Provincial legislation, many of whom work outside regular business hours. Councillor Vrbanovic indicated his support for the By-law but expressed concern over smoking prohibitions as they relate to Downtown renewal which is currently dependent on the entertainment industry, many patrons of which are smokers. He also offered the opinion that additional restrictions will not necessarily deter smoking by young people, but may have the opposite effect. Councillor Ziegler indicated his support, noting that he expects exemptions will be difficult to obtain since economic hardship will be difficult to prove given current information. He also expressed concern over ventilation, noting separate ventilation is not an issue. The motion by Councillor M. Wagner to support the draft Regional Smoking By-law was then voted on and Carried Unanimously. AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 315 (DEVELOPMENT CHARGES) OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE The Committee was in receipt of a report and recommendation from D. Mansell dated June 25, 1996 concerning deletion of the 5 year term for development charges, which included a draft amending by-law and a copy of the related public notice. Mr. Mansell pointed out an error in the by-law header and asked that the words "to exempt the Downtown area" be removed and replaced with "to extend its term". AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 315 (DEVELOPMENT CHARGES) OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE - CONT'D On a motion by Councillor G. Lorentz it was resolved: "That Council approve an amendment to Chapter 315 (Development Charges) of the City of FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MINUTES AUGUST 6, 1996 - 103 - CITY OF KITCHENER Kitchener Municipal Code so as to delete the 5 year term set out in Section 21 (2)." ELECTRICAL EXAMINING BOARD APPOINTMENT The Committee was in receipt of a report and recommendation from J. Koppeser dated June 27, 1996 concerning the resignation of Mr. Earl Welch and the filling of a vacant Board position. Councillor T. Galloway put forward a motion expressing Council's thanks to Mr. Earl Welch for his 23 years of service and appointing as his replacement, Mr. Ernie Gaessler. Councillor Jake Smola pointed out that Mr. Gaessler has been put forward as a possible replacement by the two remaining Electrical Board members and in the absence of a public notice advertising the vacancy. Mr. Parkhouse acknowledged that board and committee vacancies are normally advertised, though this was not done in this particular instance. He pointed out that Provincial legislation does not give Council the same measure of control as with other appointments. Councillor Jake Smola advised that he has received numerous calls relating to the Electrical Examining Board by which an indication was given that whether or not an applicant passes or fails a test is influenced by a political decision of the Board. He suggested that filling of the Board vacancy be deferred to allow a closer examination of the legislation and to possibly assign a term of appointment. Councillor Ziegler noted that there is no rationale for why Mr. Gaessler has been recommended, nor was a resume submitted. Councillor Lorentz indicated he was uncomfortable judging the qualifications of professionals, and noted that one of the Board members recommending the appointment of Mr. Gaessler is the Supervising Electrical Inspector of Ontario Hydro. Councillor Galloway assumed the Chair to allow Councillor Ziegler to address the issue under discussion. Councillor Ziegler suggested that at minimum, and as a courtesy, the Board recommendation should have been accompanied by a rationale or resume indicating where Mr. Gaessler has worked and his qualifications for appointment. Councillor Galloway withdrew his previous motion. Mayor Christy suggested that Mr. Gaessler be appointed for a term expiring with Council's next annual appointment of board and committee members. He further suggested that Council could request additional appointees which would be ranked by the Board in their order of preference. Mr. Parkhouse clarified earlier comments to indicate that Mr. Welch has not categorically agreed to remain on the Board beyond August 1, 1996. He suggested that the appointment could be deferred to allow staff an opportunity to review the legislative requirements of the appointment, noting that the Board could continue to operate with two members in the interim. Councillor Ziegler put forward a motion expressing Council's appreciation for Mr. Earl Welch's 23 years of service on the Electrical Examining Board and deferring an appointment to fill the vacancy pending a staff report. Councillor Vrbanovic enquired whether the report could be available for the August 12 Council meeting, and Mr. Parkhouse advised that staff would make their best effort in this regard. Councillor Galloway asked that the motion of Councillor Ziegler be voted on in two parts. ELECTRICAL EXAMINING BOARD APPOINTMENT - CONT'D On a motion by Councillor J. Ziegler it was resolved: "That City Council express its sincerest appreciation to Mr. Earl Welch for his 23 years of dedicated service as a member of the City of Kitchener Electrical Examining Board." On a motion by Councillor J. Ziegler it was resolved: FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MINUTES AUGUST 6, 1996 - 104 - CITY OF KITCHENER "That an appointment to fill a vacancy on the City's Electrical Examining Board be deferred pending a report from staff on the legislative constraints affecting the appointment and the qualifications of the individual recommended as a replacement by the two remaining Board members, and further, That if possible, said report be considered by Council at its August 12, 1996 meeting or alternately at the September 9, 1996 Finance and Administration Committee meeting." Councillor J. Ziegler then assumed the Chair. MONTE CARLO REQUEST - CANADIAN MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION The Committee was in receipt of a report from J. Koppeser dated July 17, 1996 recommending approval of the Association's request. On a motion by Councillor John Smola it was resolved: "That the City of Kitchener has not objection to a Provincial license being issued to the Canadian Mental Association, Waterloo Regional Branch, to conduct a Monte Carlo event at the Turf Club, 4278 King Street East, Kitchener, on September 6-8, 1996 inclusive." BILL 75 (AN ACT TO REGULATE ALCOHOL AND GAMING) The Committee was in receipt of a joint report from J. Koppeser and L. Parkhouse dated July 26, 1996 advising of the impact on the municipality of the proposed Bill 75. Councillor G. Lorentz put forward a motion that the City take no action as regards a written submission on the proposed legislation. Councillor Redman expressed concern that the Province will treat gaming revenues as found money and suggested the dispersement system outlined in the appendix to the staff report. Councillor G. Lorentz withdrew his previous motion. Moved by Councillor K. Redman "That by August 20, 1996, Licensing staff prepare and forward a written submission to the Province concerning the proposed Bill 75 - The Alcohol Gaming and Charity Funding Public Interest Act, 1996 recommending that the Province consider the categories and funding percentages outlined in the appendix to the joint report of J. Koppeser and L. F. Parkhouse dated July 26, 1996 entitled Lottery Fund Recommended Disbursement System, and further, That the above submission make reference to the need for the Province to set aside money to fund research and services related to gambling addiction." BILL 75 (AN ACT TO REGULATE ALCOHOL AND GAMING) - CONT'D Mayor Christy pointed to the need for a full debate on the entire gambling issue, and referred to the dangers of gambling addiction and a recent occurrence at a Montreal casino where an individual gave written authority to the staff to bar him from entering the casino. He suggested that the Provincial government needs additional background information before proceeding in this area. Councillor Wagner suggested that this debate could take place at the September meeting of the Finance and Administration Committee. The motion by Councillor K. Redman directing staff as regards a written submission relative to Bill 75 was then voted on and CARRIED. 8. POSTERING ON CITY STREET ALLOWANCES FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MINUTES AUGUST 6, 1996 - 105 - CITY OF KITCHENER The Committee was in receipt of a report and draft by-law from J. Shivas dated July 31, 1996. Mr. Shivas outlined the proposed by-laws and associated regulations and enforcement, noting that the intent would be to repeal the by-law prohibiting signs and posters on hydro poles, and to restrict these placements through amendments to Chapter 680 (Signs) of the Municipal Code. He urged Council not to make a distinction between commercial and expressive postering, noting that the draft by-law is a reasonable starting point in regard to the regulation of this activity. Councillor Vrbanovic suggested that the by-law does not go far enough in many areas and indicated his willingness to put forward a motion to enact a regulatory by-law consistent with that of the City of Waterloo. Councillor Galloway enquired as to his earlier suggestion that the City arrange to have posters removed on a regular basis in order to frustrate event advertising, and Mr. Shivas replied that this would not be an acceptable action in light of the Supreme Court decision, though hiring a student to assist in enforcement is an excellent idea. Mr. Shivas added that staff are currently recommending that posters remain up for a maximum period of 21 days. Councillor Galloway enquired whether there is any merit in standardizing the by-laws of Kitchener and Waterloo, and in this regard Mr. Shivas indicated that he has only reviewed a report to Waterloo Council concerning their proposed by-law. He noted that Waterloo is proposing the installation of 100 hydro pole sleeves at a cost of $10,000.00, and questioned whether this meets the obligation in law concerning freedom of expression. Councillor Wagner offered the opinion that Kitchener should be consistent with Waterloo in this area, and that the proposed by-law may be unenforcable in its present state. Moved by Councillor M. Wagner put forward a motion that further consideration of the draft by-law regarding postering on City street allowances be deferred until such time as the ramifications and implications of separate postering by-laws in Kitchener and Waterloo have been investigated and discussed. Councillor Lorentz pointed out that the City can re-examine its by-law for effectiveness after an implementation period, and offered the opinion that the Waterloo by-law would not likely stand up in court and that following this lead may be a waste of time and resources. The deferral motion of Councillor M. Wagner was then voted on and LOST. Mayor R. Christy put forward a motion to adopt the draft by-law as submitted by staff. He subsequently accepted, as friendly amendments, suggestions from Councillor Jake Smola that the postering period be reduced from 21 to 14 days and that staff apply to the Province for set fines in this area. A recorded vote was requested. POSTERING ON CITY STREET ALLOWANCES - CONT'D Moved by Mayor R. Christy "That Council repeal Chapter 682 (Signs and Posters on Hydro Poles) of the City's Municipal Code and enact a by-law to amend Chapter 680 (Signs) of the Code as appended to the report of J. Shivas, dated July 31, 1996, subject to reducing the postering period from 21 to 14 days, and further, That Legal staff apply to the Province for a set fine as regards postering infractions involving the revised Chapter 680." In Favour: Mayor R. Christy, Councillors K. Redman, M. Yantzi, John Smola, Jake Smola, J. Zielger, T. Galloway, G. Lorentz and C. Weylie Contra: Councillors M. Wagner and B. Vrbanovic FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MINUTES AUGUST 6, 1996 - 106 - CITY OF KITCHENER Motion Carried 9. FEASIBILITY STUDIES - ADAPTIVE RE-USE DEVELOPMENTS The Committee was in receipt of Planning and Development Department report #PD96/64 concerning possible City contribution toward the cost of adaptive re-use development studies. Councillor M. Yantzi put forward a motion to adopt the staff recommendation. Councillor Jake Smola suggested an annual cap on study funding and Mr. Stanley advised that staff had discussed this and in all probability the annual cost would not exceed $20,000.00 to $25,000.00 and are treating this as an informal cap. Any amounts in access of this figure would trigger a report to Council. Councillor Yantzi accepted, as a friendly amendment, a suggestion by Councillor Jake Smola that an upset limit of $40,000.00 be applied as a guideline for expenditures, and that contemplated expenditures in access of this amount would require consideration by Council. The motion was further amended in response to clarification from Mr. Gazzola that funds for the program would be debited from the Downtown Development Fund. On a motion by Councillor Yantzi it was resolved: "That the City of Kitchener support the renovation and conversion of targeted adaptive re- use projects through a Feasibility Study Grant Program to be administered by the Department of Planning and Development in accordance with the criteria outlined in Planning and Development Department report PD96/64 (August 6, 1996), and further, That a $40,000.00 upset limit on annual grant expenditures be established as a guideline, with staff reporting to Council for direction in the event this limit is likely to be exceeded, and further, That all expenditures relating to the Feasibility Study Grant Program be charged to the Downtown Development Fund." 10. DOWNTOWN BUILDING FACADE/INTERIOR LOAN PROGRAM The Committee was in receipt of Planning and Development Department report #PD96/65 concerning a proposed rating system and the current status of the program. 10. DOWNTOWN BUILDING FACADE/INTERIOR LOAN PROGRAM - CONT'D On a motion by Councillor M. Yantzi it was resolved: "That Council adopt the proposed rating system for the Downtown Building Facade/Interior Loan Program as outlined in Appendix A of Planning and Development Department report PD 96/65 (July 19, 1996)." 11. DECLARATION AND LEASE OF SURPLUS AIR SPACE - MTD PRODUCTS, BORDEN AVENUE SOUTH The Committee was in receipt of a report from G. Anderson dated July 18, 1996 recommending the declaration and lease. Councillor Vrbanovic questioned the City's position regarding liability and possible bankrupcy and Mr. Shivas indicated that the agreement would indicate responsibility rests with the property owners. He further advised that the bankrupcy concern would be considered when drafting the agreement. FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MINUTES AUGUST 6, 1996 - 107 - CITY OF KITCHENER On a motion by Councillor G. Lorentz it was resolved: "That air space with a minimum clearance of 17.22 feet above Borden Avenue South and situated approximately 200 feet north of Nyberg Street, be declared surplus to the City's needs and be leased for a private conveyor belt to MTD Products Limited, owner of the lands abutting both sides of Borden Avenue South, and further, That the Land Purchasing Officer be directed to negotiate a long-term lease with the abutting owner, with the final agreement to be presented to Council for approval." 12. BINGO REQUEST - NEW HAMBURG SPIRIT '83 JUNIOR C HOCKEY CLUB The Committee was in receipt of a report from J. Koppeser dated July 23, 1996 outlining a request to operate bingos in the City on an ongoing basis. On a motion by Councillor Jake Smola it was resolved: "That the request of the New Hamburg Spirit '83 Junior C Hockey Club for approval to operate bingos on an on-going basis at the Transylvania Club be denied." 13. SUGGESTION - ISSUANCE OF "LITTERING TICKETS" The Committee was in receipt of a report from S. Gyorffy dated July 17, 1996 recommending no action on a suggestion that City employees issue tickets for littering. On a motion by Councillor M. Wagner it was resolved: "That no action be taken on the suggestion of Mr. Jim Elgie that City employees issue tickets for littering, with payment through volunteering time for City clean up." 14. 1996/1997 GENERAL INSURANCE PROGRAM 14. The Committee was in receipt of a report from J. Gazzola dated July 30, 1996 containing various recommended changes to the City's General Insurance Program. Mr. Gazzola stated, for the record, that Mr. McKay had asked that this issue be referred back to Management Committee and that he does not agree with Clause #6 which specifies that in the near term the cost of claims under the deductible limits will be charged to the department or enterprise budget 1996/1997 GENERAL INSURANCE PROGRAM - CONT'D relating to the particular activity. Mr. Gazzola offered the opinion that a deferral would not be productive, and that making departments responsible for this amount may lead to greater vigilance. On a motion by Councillor B. Vrbanovic it was resolved: "That the City of Kitchener renew its 1996/1997 General Insurance Program with the Frank Cowan Company for a one-year term expiring August 31, 1997 for a total premium of $1,788,952 as detailed in Schedule B of the July 30, 1996 memorandum from J. Gazzola, and, That the City of Kitchener confirm its acceptance of the proposal of H. L. Staebler Company Limited to act as Broker of Record for the City for a three-year term commencing June 1, 1996 on a flat fee-for-service basis as follows: Year 1 $16,500 Year 2 $17,325 Year 3 $18,191 That the deductible be increased for the following areas of coverage: From To FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MINUTES AUGUST 6, 1996 - 108 - CITY OF KITCHENER Auto (Fleet and Transit) Boiler & Machinery Liability Liability (Sewer Backup) Property 5,000 $10,000 5,000 $25,000 5,000 $25,000 $10,000 $25,000 5,000 $25,000 That any premium reduction resulting from the revised deductibles be credited to the General Insurance Reserve Fund to provide for future claims under the new deductible amounts, and, That the cost allocation for insurance be adjusted immediately to reflect the increased premiums noted above, and, That, until the General Insurance Reserve Fund becomes more actuarially sound, cost of claims under the deductible limits be charged to the Department/Enterprise budget relating to the particular activity, and further, That the Commissioner of Finance present to Council by November 30, 1996, a long-term plan for maintaining the actuarial soundness of the General Insurance Reserve Fund." Councillor Weylie asked that when Mr. Gazzola prepares his report on a long term plan for the General Insurance Reserve Fund that he include a claims experience sheet. 15. PERMANENT CHARITABLE CASINO SITE The Committee was in receipt of a report from J. Koppeser dated August 1, 1996 concerning the Province's proposed 50 locations for permanent charitable casinos. On a motion by Councillor B. Vrbanovic it was resolved: "That consideration of the report of J. Koppeser dated August 1, 1996 concerning permanent charitable casino sites be deferred to the September 9, 1996 meeting of the Finance and Administration Committee." 16. NEXT MEETING The next regularly scheduled meeting of the Finance and Administration Committee will be held on Monday, September 9, 1996. 17. ADJOURNMENT On motion, the meeting adjourned at 12.50 p.m. G. Sosnoski Manager of Corporate Records/Assistant City Clerk