HomeMy WebLinkAboutDSD-19-052 - SG 2019-007 - 540 Bingemans Centre DrStaff Report
Development Services Department
REPORT TO:
DATE OF MEETING
SUBMITTED BY:
PREPARED BY:
WARD:
DATE OF REPORT:
REPORT #:
SUBJECT:
1
KIR
www.ki tch en er. c a
Committee of Adjustment
March 19, 2019
Juliane von Westerholt, Senior Planner - 519-741-2200 ext. 7157
Christian Tsimenidis, Student Planner - 519-741-2200 ext. 7074
#1
March 7, 2019
DSD -19-052
SG 2019-007 — 540 Bingemans Centre Drive
Applicant — Alicia Montieth (Labreche Patterson & Associates Inc.)
Approve AS AMENDED with Conditions
Location Map: 540 Bingemans Centre Drive
*** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. ***
Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance.
REPORT
Planning Comments:
The subject property is zoned Business Park Service Centre (B-3) with Special Regulation Provision 416R
and Special Use Provision 338U. The property is designated as Business Park Employment in the City's
2014 Official Plan. City Planning staff visited the site on February 22, 2019.
It is also important to note that the subject property is registered as a Vacant Land Condominium containing
two units. Despite the property having two separate units, the Sign By-law still regards the site as one
property.
The applicant is seeking relief from Section 680.11.13 (a) of the Sign By-law to construct a ground supported
sign at a seperation distance of 30 metres from another ground supported sign on the same property rather
than the required 50 metres.
Upon further investigation, a second variance is required for a separation distance of 28 metres from
another ground supported sign on the same property rather than the required 50 metres. The applicant
clarified that three ground supported signs will be constructed on the same property, which warrants a
second variance for the separation distance between Sign A and Sign C. Therefore, Planning Staff
recommends that the minor variance application be amended. Please see the sketch below for a visual
representation.
_ SIG _ _,�•�
4,,
GR(DUIND ' 1 BUILDING H
SUPPORTED SIGN
�L CikA— J,J=!m1
! o 1
` s
1
Image 1: Sketch of the proposed ground supported sign locations and separation distances
Planning, Urban !?sign
8 Landscape Architecture -
h
1HBC;
RICHARDSON
_ -
GMP
I
J�
It PARSONS -� s
-- i` �-
M s '7 x
- _ .:3X3': y,:; .. -•*rt _: _.
Image 2: Approximate location of Sign A
I�
1�
l
LEASE
- 197 4904
Image 3: Approximate location of Sign B
Image 4: Approximate location of Sign C
The intent of Section 680.11.13 (a) of the Sign By -Law requiring a minimum 50 metres between ground -
supported signs on the same property is to ensure that the number of ground signs on a single property do
not dominate and therefore negatively impact the streetscape.
In this case, the third ground supported sign (i.e. Sign C) is proposed to be located in the interior of the
property, meaning the sign will have minimal impact on the property's frontage. Therefore, staff is of the
opinion that the reduced separation distance proposed by the applicant is sufficient and meets the intent of
the By-law by minimizing impacts on the streetscape and surrounding area.
Based on the foregoing, Planning staff recommends that this application be approved subject to the
conditions outlined below in the Recommendation section of this report.
Building Comments:
The Building Division has no objections to the proposed sign variance provided a sign permit is obtained
prior to erection.
Transportation Services Comments:
Transportation Services has no concerns with the proposed application.
Engineering Comments:
No comments.
RECOMMENDATION
That application SG 2019-007 (as amended) requesting permission to have a separation
distance of 30 metres between two ground supported signs on the same property rather than
the required 50 metres; and, having a separation distance of 28 metres between two ground
supported signs on the same property rather than the required 50 metres be approved, subject
to the following conditions:
1) That sign permits are obtained from the Planning Division.
2) That condition 1 shall be completed prior to October 1, 2019. Any request for a time
extension must be approved in writing by the Manager of Development Review (or
designate), prior to the completion date set out in this decision. Failure to fulfill these
conditions will result in this approval becoming null and void.
Juliane von Westerholt, BES, MCIP, RPP
Senior Planner
Region of Waterloo
February 27, 2019
Holly Dyson
City of Kitchener
200 King Street West
P.O. Box 1118
Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7
Dear Ms. Dyson:
PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT
AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES
150 Frederick Street, Sth Floor
Kitchener ON N2G 4A Canada
Telephone: 519-575-4400
TTY: 519-575-4608
Fax: 519-575-4449
www. reg i o n ofwate r l o o. ca
File No.: D17-40/VAR KIT GEN
/58 KIT, Gary Bromberg (2)
Re: Committee of Adjustment Meeting on March 19, 2019, City of Kitchener
Regional staff have reviewed the following Committee of Adjustment applications and
have following comments:
1.
SG 2019-005
— 1275 Bleams Road — No Concerns.
2.
SG 2019-006
— 1415 Huron Road — The plan shows the signs located just along
the property line.
It must be ensured by the proponent that the signs including
their foundation must be located entirely on private property.
3.
SG 2019-007
— 540 Bingemans Centre Drive — No Concerns.
4.
A 2019-018 —
396 Vanier Drive — No Concerns.
5.
A 2019-019 —
396 Vanier Drive — No Concerns.
6.
A 2019-020 —
604-656 King Street East — No Concerns.
7.
A 2019-021 —
859 Queen's Boulevard — No Concerns.
8.
A 2019-022 —
312 River Trail Avenue — No Concerns.
9.
A 2019-023 —
79, 83, 87 Scott Street; 66, 68, 82 Weber Street; and 15, 25, 29
Pearl Street—No Concerns.
10.
A 2019-024 —
51 Benton Street — No Concerns.
11.
A 2019-025 —
25 Bruce Street — No Concerns.
Please be advised that any development on the subject lands is subject to the
provisions of the Regional Development Charge By-law 14-046 or any successor
thereof and may require payment of Regional Development Charges for these
developments prior to the issuance of a building permit.
The comments contained in this letter pertain to the Application numbers listed. If a site
is subject to more than one application, additional comments may apply.
Document Number: 2944634
Page 1 of 2
Please forward any decisions on the above mentioned Application numbers to the
undersigned.
Yours Truly,
Joginder Bhatia
Transportation Planner
(519) 575-4500 Ext 3867
Grand River Conservation Authority
Resource Management Division
Andrew Herreman, Resource Planning
Technician
400 Clyde Road, P.O. Box 729
Cambridge, Ontario N 1 R 5W6
Phone: (519) 621-2761 ext. 2228
E-mail: aherreman@grandriver.ca
PLAN REVIEW REPORT: City of Kitchener
Holly Dyson
DATE: March 8, 2019 YOUR FILE: See below
RE: Application for Minor Variance (Signs):
SG 2019-005 1275 Bleams Road
SG 2019-006 1415 Huron Road
SG 2019-007 540 Bingemans Centre Drive
Applications for Minor Variance:
A 2019-018
396 Vanier Drive
A 2019-019
396 Vanier Drive
A 2019-020
650-664 King Street East
A 2019-021
859 Queens Boulevard
A 2019-022
312 Rivertrail Avenue
A 2019-023
79-87 Scott Street, 66-82 Weber Street East &
A 2019-024
51 Benton Street
A 2019-025
25 Bruce Street
Applications for Consent:
B 2019-007 396 Vanier Drive
B 2019-008 50 & 52 Breckenridge Drive
B 2019-009 500 Karn Street
GRCA COMMENT*:
15-29 Pearl Place
The above noted applications are located outside the Grand River Conservation Authority areas
of interest. As such, we will not undertake a review of the applications and plan review fees will
not be required. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Andrew Herreman, CPT
Resource Planning Technician
Grand River Conservation Authority
"These comments are respectfully submitted as advice and reflect resource concerns within the scope and mandate of the Page 1 of 1
Grand River Conservation Authority.