Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDSD-19-052 - SG 2019-007 - 540 Bingemans Centre DrStaff Report Development Services Department REPORT TO: DATE OF MEETING SUBMITTED BY: PREPARED BY: WARD: DATE OF REPORT: REPORT #: SUBJECT: 1 KIR www.ki tch en er. c a Committee of Adjustment March 19, 2019 Juliane von Westerholt, Senior Planner - 519-741-2200 ext. 7157 Christian Tsimenidis, Student Planner - 519-741-2200 ext. 7074 #1 March 7, 2019 DSD -19-052 SG 2019-007 — 540 Bingemans Centre Drive Applicant — Alicia Montieth (Labreche Patterson & Associates Inc.) Approve AS AMENDED with Conditions Location Map: 540 Bingemans Centre Drive *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. REPORT Planning Comments: The subject property is zoned Business Park Service Centre (B-3) with Special Regulation Provision 416R and Special Use Provision 338U. The property is designated as Business Park Employment in the City's 2014 Official Plan. City Planning staff visited the site on February 22, 2019. It is also important to note that the subject property is registered as a Vacant Land Condominium containing two units. Despite the property having two separate units, the Sign By-law still regards the site as one property. The applicant is seeking relief from Section 680.11.13 (a) of the Sign By-law to construct a ground supported sign at a seperation distance of 30 metres from another ground supported sign on the same property rather than the required 50 metres. Upon further investigation, a second variance is required for a separation distance of 28 metres from another ground supported sign on the same property rather than the required 50 metres. The applicant clarified that three ground supported signs will be constructed on the same property, which warrants a second variance for the separation distance between Sign A and Sign C. Therefore, Planning Staff recommends that the minor variance application be amended. Please see the sketch below for a visual representation. _ SIG _ _,�•� 4,, GR(DUIND ' 1 BUILDING H SUPPORTED SIGN �L CikA— J,J=!m1 ! o 1 ` s 1 Image 1: Sketch of the proposed ground supported sign locations and separation distances Planning, Urban !?sign 8 Landscape Architecture - h 1HBC; RICHARDSON _ - GMP I J� It PARSONS -� s -- i` �- M s '7 x - _ .:3X3': y,:; .. -•*rt _: _. Image 2: Approximate location of Sign A I� 1� l LEASE - 197 4904 Image 3: Approximate location of Sign B Image 4: Approximate location of Sign C The intent of Section 680.11.13 (a) of the Sign By -Law requiring a minimum 50 metres between ground - supported signs on the same property is to ensure that the number of ground signs on a single property do not dominate and therefore negatively impact the streetscape. In this case, the third ground supported sign (i.e. Sign C) is proposed to be located in the interior of the property, meaning the sign will have minimal impact on the property's frontage. Therefore, staff is of the opinion that the reduced separation distance proposed by the applicant is sufficient and meets the intent of the By-law by minimizing impacts on the streetscape and surrounding area. Based on the foregoing, Planning staff recommends that this application be approved subject to the conditions outlined below in the Recommendation section of this report. Building Comments: The Building Division has no objections to the proposed sign variance provided a sign permit is obtained prior to erection. Transportation Services Comments: Transportation Services has no concerns with the proposed application. Engineering Comments: No comments. RECOMMENDATION That application SG 2019-007 (as amended) requesting permission to have a separation distance of 30 metres between two ground supported signs on the same property rather than the required 50 metres; and, having a separation distance of 28 metres between two ground supported signs on the same property rather than the required 50 metres be approved, subject to the following conditions: 1) That sign permits are obtained from the Planning Division. 2) That condition 1 shall be completed prior to October 1, 2019. Any request for a time extension must be approved in writing by the Manager of Development Review (or designate), prior to the completion date set out in this decision. Failure to fulfill these conditions will result in this approval becoming null and void. Juliane von Westerholt, BES, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner Region of Waterloo February 27, 2019 Holly Dyson City of Kitchener 200 King Street West P.O. Box 1118 Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7 Dear Ms. Dyson: PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES 150 Frederick Street, Sth Floor Kitchener ON N2G 4A Canada Telephone: 519-575-4400 TTY: 519-575-4608 Fax: 519-575-4449 www. reg i o n ofwate r l o o. ca File No.: D17-40/VAR KIT GEN /58 KIT, Gary Bromberg (2) Re: Committee of Adjustment Meeting on March 19, 2019, City of Kitchener Regional staff have reviewed the following Committee of Adjustment applications and have following comments: 1. SG 2019-005 — 1275 Bleams Road — No Concerns. 2. SG 2019-006 — 1415 Huron Road — The plan shows the signs located just along the property line. It must be ensured by the proponent that the signs including their foundation must be located entirely on private property. 3. SG 2019-007 — 540 Bingemans Centre Drive — No Concerns. 4. A 2019-018 — 396 Vanier Drive — No Concerns. 5. A 2019-019 — 396 Vanier Drive — No Concerns. 6. A 2019-020 — 604-656 King Street East — No Concerns. 7. A 2019-021 — 859 Queen's Boulevard — No Concerns. 8. A 2019-022 — 312 River Trail Avenue — No Concerns. 9. A 2019-023 — 79, 83, 87 Scott Street; 66, 68, 82 Weber Street; and 15, 25, 29 Pearl Street—No Concerns. 10. A 2019-024 — 51 Benton Street — No Concerns. 11. A 2019-025 — 25 Bruce Street — No Concerns. Please be advised that any development on the subject lands is subject to the provisions of the Regional Development Charge By-law 14-046 or any successor thereof and may require payment of Regional Development Charges for these developments prior to the issuance of a building permit. The comments contained in this letter pertain to the Application numbers listed. If a site is subject to more than one application, additional comments may apply. Document Number: 2944634 Page 1 of 2 Please forward any decisions on the above mentioned Application numbers to the undersigned. Yours Truly, Joginder Bhatia Transportation Planner (519) 575-4500 Ext 3867 Grand River Conservation Authority Resource Management Division Andrew Herreman, Resource Planning Technician 400 Clyde Road, P.O. Box 729 Cambridge, Ontario N 1 R 5W6 Phone: (519) 621-2761 ext. 2228 E-mail: aherreman@grandriver.ca PLAN REVIEW REPORT: City of Kitchener Holly Dyson DATE: March 8, 2019 YOUR FILE: See below RE: Application for Minor Variance (Signs): SG 2019-005 1275 Bleams Road SG 2019-006 1415 Huron Road SG 2019-007 540 Bingemans Centre Drive Applications for Minor Variance: A 2019-018 396 Vanier Drive A 2019-019 396 Vanier Drive A 2019-020 650-664 King Street East A 2019-021 859 Queens Boulevard A 2019-022 312 Rivertrail Avenue A 2019-023 79-87 Scott Street, 66-82 Weber Street East & A 2019-024 51 Benton Street A 2019-025 25 Bruce Street Applications for Consent: B 2019-007 396 Vanier Drive B 2019-008 50 & 52 Breckenridge Drive B 2019-009 500 Karn Street GRCA COMMENT*: 15-29 Pearl Place The above noted applications are located outside the Grand River Conservation Authority areas of interest. As such, we will not undertake a review of the applications and plan review fees will not be required. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please contact me. Sincerely, Andrew Herreman, CPT Resource Planning Technician Grand River Conservation Authority "These comments are respectfully submitted as advice and reflect resource concerns within the scope and mandate of the Page 1 of 1 Grand River Conservation Authority.