Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDSD-19-206 - Kitchener Growth Management Plan (KGMP) 2019-2021+REPORT TO:Planning and Strategic InitiativesCommittee DATE OF MEETING:September 30, 2019 SUBMITTED BY:Alain Pinard, Director of Planning, 519-741-2200 ext. 7319 PREPARED BY:TimDonegani,Senior Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7067 WARD(S) INVOLVED:ALL DATE OF REPORT:September 16, 2019 REPORT NO.:DSD-19-206 SUBJECT:Kitchener Growth Management Plan (KGMP) 2019-2021 ______________________________________________________________________ THATthe Kitchener Growth Management Plan Fall 2019to Fall 2021, attached to report DSD-19-206, be approved. BACKGROUND: In January 2009, Council approved the Kitchener Growth Management Strategy(KGMS). A key action item from the KGMS was to evolve the 40 year old practice of the Staging of Development into a comprehensive plan to manage growth-related projects, infrastructure, land use planning and development applications. In May 2009, Council approved the first Kitchener Growth Management Plan (KGMP). Subsequent KGMPs were approved by Council in 2011, 2013, 2015and 2017. This report provides a KGMP for the 2019to 2021timeframe. REPORT: The KGMP assigns a relative priority to properties in intensification areas and greenfield growth areas in consideration of timing of related infrastructure and community facilities. The KGMP is tabled for Council approval biannually in the Fall to inform the sequence of growth related infrastructure in the Capital Budget process for the following year. The KGMP also informs and aligns with the2019 DevelopmentCharges background Study. The KGMP is used by City divisions, the Region, the GRCA, School Boards and other agencies to prioritize their work loads. KGMP 2017-2019Achievements Since the KGMP 2017-2019, 3 plans of subdivision received draft approval,either through Council or the Local Planning Appeals Tribunal (LPAT). In late 2017, 2018 and early 2019, a total of 293 dwelling units were draft approved. Additionally,in these years, 8 plans of subdivision or stages of plans were registered containing a total of 963 units.This historically low level of development approvals through subdivision can be compared to an increase in intensification. Over the same period, 1486 units were created within the Built-up Area. 1 - 1 KGMP 2019-2021 Process Aninternal staff team, comprised of Planning, Engineering, Transportation, Building, Financial Planning,Parks and Cemeteries, Neighbourhood Programs,and Information Technology,conducted a preliminary analysis of parcels and project timing based on the Growth Management Plan criteria. Adraft KGMP was prepared, including the assignment of relative priorities to land parcels. The draft KGMP was circulated to City departments, agencies, landowners and their representatives in July. The KGMPwas discussed at the August meeting of the Waterloo Region Homebuilders Association Kitchener Liaison Committee. The internal staff team reviewed all comments received in order to provide responses (which are contained later in this report) and produce the final KGMP. Highlights The KGMP 2019-2021(AppendixA)includes a relative priority ranking based on three categories: Relative PriorityDescription Priority A (Green)Development applications would complete the community and no additional major infrastructure is required Priority B (Orange)Some additional infrastructure is required and/or there is dependency upon other lands Priority C (Red)The timing of major infrastructure or the completion of macro- level studies is farther into the futureor required before detailed plans can be considered The outlook for the KGMP 2019-2021includes the consideration and relative prioritization of a significant number of parcels of land and growth-related initiatives. The following is a summary of the recommended prioritization of land parcels: Priority APriority BPriority C 24andmore than 20 194 intensification areas The recommended Priority A and B lands combined consist of 20 draft approved plans, 7 plans in circulation and 16future plans (pending) for a total of 43parcels. One Priority C parcel is draft approved, one is in circulation and two are future plans, all of which require future works/applications. Although lands indicated as Priority C are the lowest priority for development applications, there are often initiatives recommended to be undertaken and completed within each of these areas in advance of the submission of development applications during the upcoming 2-year timeframe. The approach to growth management is not just about prioritizing the number of plans of allocation of resources towards conducting studies that are needed before development can be considered along with completing initiatives that are required to move lands for draft approval to registration and construction. These initiatives include proceeding with 1 - 2 environmental assessments and detailed design for roads, sanitary servicing infrastructure and improvements, intersection upgrades, new cycling path construction, neighbourhood planning reviews,secondary plans,complete community considerations and park/trail implementation. Preliminary CirculationComments There were 20comments received on the preliminary circulation regarding 25 parcels/areas. These comments were from landowners,consultants on behalf of landownersand the GRCA. The comments received on the preliminary circulation are contained within AppendixBto this report. The following is a summary, by Planning Community, of the comments and staff responses. Major Transit Station Area 607-641 KING STREET WEST MHBC on behalf of Centre Ice LP Comment MHBC supports the staff recommended Priority A timing. Mixed Use Nodes North Side of Huron Road, east of Strasburg RoadMHBC on behalf of Activa Holdings Inc. Commentistent with the balance of the node. Response The community node (recently fully in effect via LPAT).A future KGMP will reflect the new intensification areasidentified in the 2014 Official Planfollowing an update to the strategic growth areas as part of a future provincial and regional policy conformity amendment process (expected for the next versionof the KGMP). Grand River North KGMP Plan ID# 87MHBC on behalf of Hallman Construction Ltd. Comment MHBC supports the staff recommended Priority A timing. Grand River South KGMP Plan ID# 66Woolner Trail Community Association and Grand River Conservation Authority Comment -The portion of the parcel south of the Woolner Farm should be removed because the lands have not been deemed surplus by the GRCA. Staff responseStaff agree, south portion of removed from parcel #66. Hidden Valley KGMP Plan ID#s 57, 58&GPeter Benninger on behalf of Pearl Valley Development Corp. 1 - 3 Comment Request priorityberaised fromCto Bto reflectadvancesin the planning process, contribution to intensificationand densitytargets, complete communities and housing choices, andcompletion of the River Road Extension EA. Response Priority C is being recommended as the secondary plan and infrastructure including the sanitary EA is required prior to development applications being considered. Recently, the Hidden Valley Land Use Master Plan was approved and provides direction to undertake the detailed planning and engineering studiesin 2020.The KGMP assigns these projects as the highest priorityA.The completion of those projects is expected by the next KGMP and these macro-level studies should be prioritized. Continuing to resource these projectswill better position these lands to potentially elevate their priority inafuture KGMP.Staff recommends retaining Priority C timing for these lands and is recommending Priority A for the Hidden ValleySecondary Plan and Wastewater ServicingEA. KGMP Plan ID#115MHBC on behalf of Hidden Valley KitchenerLTD (Peter Kruse) Comment MHBC supports the staff recommended Priority A timing. Doon South Phase 2 Lands East of Parcel #97 John Vos Comment Owner questioned why lands are not included in KGMP and if this would present challenges to comprehensive development of parcel #97 and the subject lands. Response Thesubject lands arenot included because they are a registered block in a subdivision. Non-inclusion in KGMP will not be an obstacle to comprehensive development.No change recommended. KGMP Plan ID#90 MHBC on behalf of Activa Holdings Inc Comment MHBC supports the staff recommended Priority A timing. Brigadoonand Brigadoon South KGMP Plan IDs #33, #34 and #35-MHBC on behalf of property owners Comment MHBC supports the staff recommended Priority A timing and requests clarification that Biehn drive is a road and sanitary sewer project. Repose Added claritythat Biehn Drive (SA1, R10 & W6) includes coordinated sanitary, road and watermain components. Huron KGMP Plan ID#28 MHBC on behalf of Activa Holdings Inc Comment MHBC supports the staff recommended Priority A timing. 1 - 4 Dundee North Lands Immediately Eastof KGMP Plan ID#35 and#36MHBC on behalf of Activa Holdings Inc. Comment MHBC requests that these lands be included in the KGMP as part of a logical extension of the Brigadoon growth area and that Priority B be assigned Response macro-level planning process. It is the without an urban land use designation. Currently, these lands are not included in the BrigadoonCommunity Planwhich is why they have not been shown within the Brigadoon Growth Area. Through the Dundee North Secondary Planning process, it may be determined that these lands along Strasburg Road relate to a certain area for infrastructure, land use or community planning reasons. Until suchtime, staff will continue to recommend no priorityas part of the KGMP. General Comments MHBC on behalf of Activa Holdings Inc. Comment MHBC supports the identification of Dundee North in the KGMPand the confirmation of secondary plan timing identified fromthe Regional and City Official Plans. MHBC suggests that the following additional matters be identified in the growth area including: that funding for the secondary plan and related studies have an approved budget; that the South Strasburg Sanitary Trunk Sewer has been extended with gravity limits to be confirmed; that the alignment of Strasburg Road South has been confirmed; that an east west collector road and Blair Creek drive extension shouldbe coordinated with the secondary plan; and that the KGMP should identify Dundee North lands as Priority C. Response Staff appreciate these comments.Consistent with past City practice in the KGMP the comprehensive studies and subsequent Official Plan amendment for urban land use designations need to be completed prior to identifying a development priority. This isthe same treatment as the southwest master plan area prior to the approval of the Rosenberg Secondary Plan and subsequent identification of individual parcels. Once this work has been completed future KGMPs will assign individual ID numbers, provide details oninfrastructure, timing and,assign relative priorities.Staff do not recommend assigning a priority at this time,but do recommend identifying the necessary studies as high priority for 2019-2021.Staff haveadded additional descriptionof the required transportation and sanitary studies and infrastructure for the growth area. KGMP Plan ID#147MHBC on behalf of Activa Holdings Inc. Comment Dundee north or Huron South subarea plans. Please insure these lands are included Response Staff have included these lands in the Huron South subarea. Rosenberg 1 - 5 KGMP Plan ID#122and #126 MHBC on behalf of Activa Holdings Inc. Comment -MHBC supports the staff recommended Priority Band request clarifying that properties can proceed subjecttothe construction of Middle Strasburg Trunk Sanitary Sewer (MSTSS). Response Staff confirm that the MSTSS is the main constraint to developing these parcelsalong with the requirement to rezone the lands. KGMP Plan ID#120 GSP onbehalf of South Estates Ltd. Comment Recommend upgrading from Priority B to A because the approval of the Rosenberg secondary plan demonstrates support ofCity, Regional and Provincial objectives;these landswould contribute to increasing the supply of low rise residential units in the City; improvethe balance of Priority A parcels located within the Designated Greenfield Area; the infrastructure projectsadvancing in 2020 including the MSTSS, Fischer-Hallmanroad reconstruction; RBJ Schlegel Park;and supporting budgets. Response Priority B status provides for this application to be worked on within the next two years and provides for Credit for Service agreements to advance the infrastructure needed to support development. Staff continue to recommend Priority Bfor most properties in Rosenberg, including the subjectlands in order to advance the criteriaand objectives including:prioritizingresources, aligning development with infrastructure and ensuring complete communities.Also, there are other lands that servicing must go through prior to development of this plan. KGMP Plan ID#132 MHBC on behalf of Stamm Investments Ltd. Comment -MHBC supports the staff recommended Priority Band requests that comments regarding the Middle Strasburg Trunk Sanitary Sewer (MSTSS)relating to parcel #133 and 134 be revised to describe other parcels over which the MSTSS will pass as well asother infrastructure dependencies. ResponseStaff have revised the description of parcels133 and 134to be consistent with infrastructure comments on other parcels. SGL on behalf of Kitchener Green Developments Inc. Comment SGLsupports the staff recommended Priority B ranking and request that the Response -Name updated Laurentian West Phase 3b KGMP Plan ID#117 MHBC on behalf of Activa Holdings Inc Comment MHBC supports the staff recommended Priority A timing. KGMP Parcel ID#145-Polocorp INCon behalf of Kitchener Trussler Holdings Inc. 1 - 6 Comment Requesting priority be elevated to A because the site is within the Built-up Area,hasservicing available, the required sanitary pumping station is under construction, and the required planning applications are intended to be submitted in the near future. ResponseTheportion of the parcel located south of the old Ottawa Street alignment is within the Built-up Area.Consistent with past practice, staff recommend that this portion of thepropertybe removedfromparcel 145.Development parcels within the Built-up Area, but outside of intensification areas,may upon written request, be identified as a Site Specific Intensification Opportunity (SSIO) at the discretion of the Directorof Planning. SSIOs have priority A status. The triangular portion of the parcel north of the old Ottawa Street alignment is withinthe Designated Greenfield Areaand should continue to be assigned a priority.No development application has been received to date and staff continue to recommend priority B. KGMP Parcel ID#146 -Polocorp INC on behalf of Dr. Steven Taylor Comment Requesting priority be elevated to A because the site is within the Built-up Area, has servicing available, the required sanitary pumping station is under construction, andthe required planning applications are intended to be submitted in the near future. ResponseThe site is within the Built-up Area. Consistent with past practice, staff recommend that this parcel not have a priority assigned.Development parcels within the Built-up Area, but outside of intensification areas, may upon written request, be identified as SSIO at the discretion of the Director of Planning. SSIOs have priority A status. Response-No development application has been received to date and staff continue to recommend priority B. ALIGNMENT WITH CITY OF KITCHENER STRATEGIC PLAN: through the delivery of core service. FINANCIALIMPLICATIONS: Decisions on the KGMP are intended to inform the growth-related Capital Budget forecast and assist withthe coordinationof the provision of services and timing of development. Changes to the KGMP may impact the timing and/or financial implications of infrastructure and non-infrastructure projects (although there are numerous other factors and influences). The KGMP is reflective of the 2019Development Charges Background Study and has informed the in progress2020Capital Budget. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM of the committee meeting. 1 - 7 CONSULT A draft KGMP was circulated to landowners and their representatives in July. Consideration of their comments is reflected in this report. This item was also discussed at the Augustmeeting of the Waterloo Region Homebuilders Association Kitchener Liaison Committee. CONCLUSION: The KGMP provides a comprehensive plan that identifies the relative priority for development applications, studies and infrastructure projects within growth areas. The KGMP implements the KGMS and the Developme City for everyone REVIEWED BY: Brandon Sloan, Manager, Long Range and Policy Planning Della Ross, Manager, Development Review Linda Cooper, Manager, Development Engineering Mark Hildebrand, Director, Neighbourhood Programs Dan Ritz, Supervisor, Parks Design and Development Ruth-Anne Goetz, Senior Financial Analyst ACKNOWLEDGED BY: Justin Readman,General Manager, Development Services Appendix A-Kitchener Growth Management Plan 2019-2021(available online www.kitchener.ca Appendix B-Preliminary Circulation Comments Received 1 - 8 2021 Fall - 2019 Fall Kitchener Growth Management Plan (KGMP) , 2019 10 Draft Final September 1 - 9 2 333449 6 34 4 778 4 3 . ........ ........... .................... ................... ........................................ ........................... ....................... ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................................................ UBPLANS ................................ S ................................................................ REA ................................ A ................................ ................................ ................................................................ ROWTH ................................ ................................ G ................................ OALS G ................................ ................................ ................................................................ AP AND ................................ ................................................................ M TRATEGYTRATEGY SS EVELOPMENT D IVISION RITERIA ROCESS PC D UMMARY ................................ LAN LAN S CHIEVEMENTS ................................ PP ANAGEMENT ANAGEMENT A + MM................................ 1 192 TAGING OF UBPLANS ................................ S S 2020 KGMP LANNING AGEMENT -- RITERIA ROWTH ROWTH C GG P ANAGEMENT AN REA A: 1719 MMA 2020 TH Overall CriteriaArea Specific AnalysisRelative Priority Ranking ROWROWTH ROWTH ISTORICAL URPOSEITCHENER ITCHENER PKKGHGG RITERIA FOR PPENDIX NTRODUCTION 4 ¡«¤ ®¥ #®­³¤­³² ICKGMPKGMPA ECHNOLOGY EPARTMENT T D EPARTMENTS D - the ERVICES , were S evolve NFORMATION I Directions to ITCHENER city along with K in Kitchener the A Regional Concept, orseshoe growth plan, EVELOPMENT ITY OF H - future D ALONG WITH AND INPUT FROM ALL C : rapid growth of 100,000 new . This document, the Growth Y again leads the way in Ontario ars the process became known B for the many other municipalities in Ontario to more than double in 20 years. The trowth management strategy. Social, approved report led the way as an - ed forecasting to evolve the old Staging of Development REPARED P titled, Kitchener 2000 the way for coordinating subdivision growth in yet necessary. en as come Following work on a new Official Plan in 1968 nce again , h a logical economic means for developing the city was , paved Monitoring Report, once Evolution of a Leadership Process (the Staging of Development Story) 100,000 was expect 2031. Our citizens have told us that doing more on growth - is part of a provincial Greater Golden the growth management landscape significantly changed. For , closely relate to the financial ability of the City to provide velopment. rapid growth Management . Our Region has an approved g population of the provision of engineering services with the timing of approving new Kitchener Planning Department undertook and participated in several long predicted that would The a certain percent of growth to the existing built up area of ded the Staging of De rea. In the 1960s, population growth and expectations soaring. proactive range studies aimed at guiding the future growth of Kitchener and the surrounding aOne of these studies from 1964 given the neeinfrastructure services for an area. Planning Department started preparing an annual Lot Levies Report. This report coordinatedsubdivisions. At the time, the annual Councileffective tool for managing growth and after several yeas The Staging of Development Kitchener. It was nearly 30 or more years later thaimplemented a formal staging program. As with all processes, the need to arises. After 40 yearsthe first time, KitchenerPlaces to Growenvironmental and economic objectives have become more complex. orientmonitoring growth data are difficultThe projections for Kitchener are oresidents between 2006management and improving the quality of life in the context of this potential growth is important for our future. The time into the new Kitchener Growth Management StrategyManagement Plan, represents one of the implementation tools that coupled with an Annual Growth to effectively manage our growth for a better Kitchener. 1 - 10 3 the nnial Once with a ement . KGMS update provide based on The Growth can static . established in There will be a Places to Grow early Fall is evolution of this presented n to utilize existing related items in - the al Growth Management i for meeting in this report. nn are to be Bie hed Studies, etc.). Monitoring Report and a Bie later in intensification areas and all of the 2 year period. . Growth Management Plan is Although the KGMS data for a al .i consideration of growth identified is nn Management Committee of Council growth of the city. New engineering infrastructure staging new subdivision development with new Bie Monitoring Report would be prepared immediately eport could also provide opportunity to update the rogram further described orp both greenfield and intensification areas Growth Management Plan are . The Monitoring Report would provide the annual . The r al as i nn Kitchener. The Growth Management Plan must be adhered to approach f Bie that still have some greenfield lands left in Kitchener an an Annual Growth , June 16th and deliberation at a Management as part of an ongoing inventory, intensification levels and other data items presented in the The Growth Management Plan prepare ide the timing and location of new development growth areas Current Baseline Report to he Growth Places to Grow intensification efforts and opportunities are now considered and new for consideration forms the strategic basis for informing the t The detailed criteria and analysis so that estimated land use criteria for the staging of development in the Growth Management Plan ProcessThe City of Kitchener developed was tied to development tool. The Kitchener Growth Management Strategy provides process Growth Plan measures are tracked. It also provides an opportunity to more comprehensively understand and coordinate many of the elements that happen in the development process (Environmental Assessments, Master Plans, Subdivisions, SubwatersThe new approach is to Growth Management Plan a dynamic format, tof the Background Study after the date of implementation of the KGMS recommendations/new actions and comment on the implementation of other objectives from the Provincial and Regional Growth PlansThe Monitoring Report provides part of the basis to then consider the Plan. This Plan includes the Urban Growth Centre, the planning communities/Act, Provincial Policy Statement and Places to Grow Growth Plan that intensificatioinfrastructure and services is a high priority. The numerous factors, including the achievement of Provincial, Regional and City growth managobjectives. balanced approach positive benefits to the quality of life in in considering development applications and related initiatives in the forthcoming year(s).The Annual Monitoring Report and covering reporapproved, thisCapital Budget process. in Official priority. existing to support high provide the new Kitchener include identified lso a this is achieved to the use of , the by which and new actions vision, the strategic direction maximizing esources initiativesKitchener. anner in the goals of the KGMS. s current o live, invest and be creative the Kitchener context. They are reflected in the achieve and implementing intensification is a e quality of life outline of has evolved. The process is now hoice growth for tegy includes Background Study reports and a Strategy yield a relative priority for each growth area, enhance growth areas and is to have a more complete analysis of the people want t tool how and an ltural and recreational network enhance th where Natural and Cultural Heritage R and are adapted to conomy legislation, municipalities are charged with ensuring that they direct proper to help and address , Communities the healthy community model gement Plan is based on the principle that Ontario Staging of Development process. Through the Kitchener Growth Management Strategy trengthen building communities improving the social, cu Enhance our Valued Create Vibrant Urban Places Ensure Greater Transportation CSFoster a Strong EManage Change in an Effective and Coordinated M , with the most significant being the Region of Waterloo Official Plan Goal 1: Goal 2: Goal 3: Goal 4: Goal 5: Goal 6: IntroductionPurposeIn accordance with and orderly development within their boundary. There are many methods KitchenerPlan and the (KGMS), the Staging of Development intensification areas along with greenfieldrequirements for growth in each area, coordination of initiativesThis Growth Manainfrastructure is preferred and that planning Kitchener Growth Management StrategyThe Kitchener Growth Management Stradocument. The final Strategy includes an outline of the overall community for the KGMS, the supporting goals growth management in Kitchener. The Strategy helps to ensure that growth is managed effectively, that we can achieve the required density and intensification targets while accomplishing our desired built form and function and Kitchener Growth Management Strategy GoalsThe KGMS embodiesdevelopment and growth for the Kitchener of tomorrow, certain strategic directionsactions that are recommended for Kitchener. These build upon the six overall goals of the Regional Growth Management Strategy following: 1 - 11 4 of Some table indicated in draft) s are : based on Region Note Partial existing( CommentMostly outsideGreenfield area includes mixed use nodeCommentOfficial Plan Laurentian W. Master Drainage Plan , , and the description (s) up Area - all areas to yield a Relative Priority. oals (such as community plans or secondary g ESPA , Area, (s) Valleyland, , Under review, x KGMS elopment left to be built includes a summary initiatives EIS required , Woodland (name) (s) comparative analysis of Description Inside, Outside, BothIdentified Intensification Greenfield Area, Both, Portion of Greenfield Area, Mainly BuiltIntensification only, Would complete partial existing, New/vacant, ExistingDescription Regional Recharge, Wellhead, Surface Intake, NoneComplete, Pending, Required, N/AStudy requirements include (comment)Includes WetlandNone, UnknownPublic/Private,Includes known designated (or undesignated) resource, under review, incl./adj. heritage district HIA required, Implements policies, Proposes new techniques, None proposed, High/Medium/Low (H/M/L)Potentially H/M/L, Existing service, other, required infrastructure is table includes considerations to building complete communities, . Th for intensification areas (Mixed Use Nodes, Mixed Use Corridors, etc) and items lans infrastructure and planning Conservation Subp Functional . Heritage Provision and forms part of the basis for Impact on Heating/Electric wnership) Growth Area Planning Community A (Generic Example):LocationRelation to Built BoundaryTypeComplete Community StatusGoal 1: Enhance our Valued Natural and Cultural Heritage ResourcesAnalysisSource Water Protection Area Subwatershed/Drainage StudyNatural (Feature, Designation, OCultural Heritage ConservationEnergy Conservation * Area Specific AnalysisThe each planning community that has greenfield devarea specific analysiscoordinating major plans)The area specific analysis is organized into the sithe table below . a is that to help for each criteria: Growth Area rall criteria rk priorities and riorities bjectives overall ove and combined with being of citizens is - for each shall ensure that there area specific analysis lan. details growth management principles overall criteria Subp There is a list of identify year requirements) - ations to the following the health and wellother directives. Other Municipal Strategic Priorities lans and 10 that - . It also includes Subp evolved into new along with nment and energy, protection of our drinking water, with consider of initiatives. are These factors include the City's Ten Year Capital Budget; Growth Area / Land Supply (3 balanced ection of the environment. The Construction Activity s and time to work on various studies, initiatives, review technical is based on numerous factors. s is and Agency Input planning community Growth Management Plan that indicates Relative P is included in each Growth Area that Inventory evels ctly adhered to. Land Provincial, Regional and City Growth Plan and Official Plan O , provisions of the Planning Act and best practice nd greenfield relative to other growth areas of the city is a modification of the historic approach a ty Resource L area year time frame (while at the same time planning for future development). In addition, Potential Intensification Level StatusRecent and Expected timing of growth area - ooo apital Budget/Forecast, Development Charges and area specific analysis Achievement of Annual Monitoring Report:Balanced Growth (Intensification and Greenfield)Timing of Sewage Treatment Plant ImprovementsMunicipal C municipality is also charged with helping ensure document includes an overall potential Criteria for Staging of DevelopmentIn accordance with Section 2 of the Ontario Planning Act, the Provincial Policy Statement, provincial, regional and city growth plans and the City Official Plan, the municipality plan in place to ensure there is proper and orderly development and that growth is managed effectively. The maintained along with conservation of the enviroproviding a range of housing including affordable, This intensification The historical Staging of Development criteria the goals of the KGMSto form Historical CriteriaThe criteria for determining the historical Staging of Development included many considerations that in some years were not strithe development charge revenue available on an annual basis to provide funding for growth related capital works; recommended Regional priorities and Regional financing schedules; woallocation of staff resources; strategic priorities; the prior or imminent approval of Community or Secondary Plans; and the work programs of the other agencies and City Departments responsible for the delivery of services and/or the protGrowth Management Plan CriteriaThe level of priorito the Staging of Development and staff and Council consider with respect to balancing realistic growth and development expectations in the coming 2each growth area requires resourceplans and development applications. ensure complete communities and coordination Overall CriteriaThe 1 - 12 5 soccer) Unbuilt (4 ball, 2 Potential 2012 CommentCommentComplete = Lowest Consideration TBD, comment space, Existing full, H/M/L, cost, TBD, commentH/M/L, cost, TBD, commentH/M/L, cost, TBD, comment lylyly Description Existing, Required in planning community, Unbuilt, Type (District, Community, Nbhd.), TBDIndicate potential yearExisting, TBD, Unbuilt in planning community, Not in planning communityIndicate potential yearExisting, Potential, New development proposing, Outside of planning commty, Includes institutionalExisting withRequires new unbuilt, None plannedIndicate potential yearPotential H/M/L, None proposedDescription Existing urban designation, Existing urban proposed amendment, New urban proposedN/A, Rescinded, Approved, Underway, RequiredExisting, Required, Underway, N/AExisting, Existing requires amendment, New urban zoning requiredComplete, Required, Type, UnknownPotentialPotentialPotentialPotentially H/M/L, cost,Potentially H/M/L = Highest Consideration TimingTimingTiming initiatives and plans move through the development process this will change the analysis in future versions) Goal 5: Strengthen CommunitiesAnalysisActive Park ProvisionLeisure/Community FacilitiesProvision of Social/Cultural InstitutionsElementary School AccommodationAffordable Housing ProvisionGoal 6: Managing Change in an Effective and Coordinated MannerAnalysisOfficial Plan StatusCommunity Plan StatusNeighbourhood Concept Plan/Master Plan StatusZoning StatusStatus of Master Engineering PlansImpact on cost of engineering infrastructureImpact on Cost of Park/Leisure/Community FacilitiesImpact on Cost of School ProvisionDevelopment Charge ImpactsMaintenance Implications Denotes Critical Factor * (as planned Comment planned higherCommentNot existing (30 min. service)CommentIncludes planned office blocks. - Direct development, single use, TBD Description Complete, Pending, Required, N/A Community includes existing, Community planned to include, Potential for development site to include, Primarily All types, Mixed, High/medium rise multi, Single/semi/towns, One type, Existing neighbourhood mixedExisting, None required, May be required, New development, N/ADowntown, 40%, Greenfield density target, Unknown, commentDescription Within Central Transit Corridor, Include transit hub, Existing transit, Planned transit, Level of service, Unknown Existing, Potential widening of existing, New required prior to New with development, EA requiredExisting, Potential widening of existing, New required prior to development, New with development, EA requiredExisting cycling route, Includes planned route, Unknown, (indicate location)Includes destinations, Based on 5minute walk, Potentially H/M/L, Primarily recreational only Potentially H/M/LDescription Includes existing, Planned or potential in community, None, Type, commentIncluded, Close proximity, connections, Beyond walking/cycling distance, Indirect, comment, TBDExisting, Potentially requires upgrades, New infrastructure required, TypePotentially H/M/LPotentially included, None, UnknownPotentially H/M/L Places Talent Goal 2: Create Vibrant Urban AnalysisStatus of Urban Design Guidelines Mixture of Land UsesType of Housing ProposedStatus of Streetscape ProjectsContribution to Places to Grow Numerical TargetsGoal 3: Ensure Greater Transportation ChoiceAnalysisTransit Status Regional StreetsCity StreetsImpact on Cycling Master PlanPedestrian Charter/WalkabilityContribution to TDMGoal 4: Foster a Strong EconomyAnalysisProvision of Industrial/Skilled Employment LandsAccessibility to Employment LandsEffective Use of Existing InfrastructureHousing to Support EmploymentBrownfield Redev. OpportunitiesAttraction of 1 - 13 6 individual riorities are shown. a map showing properties / subdivision parcels) (Examples of Relative P Each Growth Area has Sample Portion of Growth Management Plan . in for : take given . 1) - ranking during the competing will prevail the coming will be in priority levels of Both Priority A and priority Relative Priority rastructure may be year timeframe. These - If there is a three next 2 with high priority on applications and initiatives with this se initiatives may be commenced or are eligible for consideration of potential ed. , staff recommends a and initiatives with this Priority B applications may require some . development . Notwithstanding this, Priority A applications These applications complete the community and ing the timeframe of this KGMP. . r there is a competition for resources, etc. applications u lands/development applications will be considered pment applications priority for time/resources with other rankings, this will also be actively worked area specific analysis . The Relative Priorities are reflected in develo year timeframe - Developmenthighestrequire no additional major infrastructure. interestThe Urban Growth Centre has the overall highest priority (AThe intent is that priority 2precedence if timeframe of this KGMPadditional infrastructure. Some of this infconstructed dBDevelopment Charge Credit Refund Agreement for infrastructure.Lands identified as Priority C do not meet the KGMP overall or area specific criteria for consideration in the lands may have significant environmental, servicing timing or financial implications. Often these lands require infrastructure to come through other lands that are given a higher priority first before these lands can be developPriority C premature and will not be actively worked on during the timeframe of this KGMP. There may be specific high level initiatives, broad studies/environmental assessments required to be completedthese areas first. Some of thecompleted during the timeframe of this KGMP. and the ea and major initiative overall criteria Red GreenOrange ,, Relative Priority RankingBased on the each growth arPriority APriority BPriority C, Lowest Highest 1 - 14 7 lan tion P t still e not official map above ay be prioritized anagement Departments and obtained from the M is other rowth G Forecast and Development of City representatives from: s could affect the staging proposed. Director of Planning in consulta or lands be considered a Site Specific Intensification may lative priority for all development applications within and Community Services. Input lands the , development charge budgets, inclusion of a project in the Capital s and agencies upon written request to the satisfaction of the , law. Overall, the intent is to provide a tool that helps coordinate and prioritize the timing ap -epartment The intent is to link the relative priority of a growth area from this Growth Management Plan with The staff review and recommendation of the overall criteria and area specific analysis as it applies to lands within the Kitchener Growth Management Plan consistPlanning, Engineering, Finance, Building Region of Waterloo, the School Boards and the Grand River Conservation Authority.A number of factors have been considered in determining what developments mto proceed. Significant changes in any of these factors In budgeting for adequate funds for the construction of bridges, culverts, major roads, trunk sewers, etc. through capital works or Budget and Forecast does not constitute approval to proceed with any specific project. It only reflects the City's priorities at the date of adoption of the Budget. Individual projects musreceive specific Council approval and allocation prior to being undertaken.the timing of its needed infrastructure in the Capital Budget and Charges Byof development with the goals of the Kitchener Growth Management Strategy.The intent of the KGMP is to help guide the rea growth area. The primary focus is on plans of subdivision, vacant land condominiums and plan amendments for new urban land use designations within growth areas that have not previously been considered in past Staging of Development Reports. indicated or given a priority timing in the staging of development program. The identification of potential draft plan of subdivision approval timing may prejudice consideration of any Official Plan Amendment.cases, if they are not within an identified intensification area on the Overview Mwith other dOpportunity and prioritized accordingly (current Priority A).Development applications or initiatives proposed for parcels that are not shown on the may be given a priority by the Director of Planning, in consultation with Agencies. . Notes:1. 2. 3. 4. 5.67. in is one were registered 4 welling units were Priority C plans in circulation and 293 d 7 draft approved, , a total of The following is a summary of the approval (either through Council or k/trail implementation. year timeframe. on or stages of plans - si draft Priority C parcel is draft approved plans, and early 2019 19 within each of these areas in advance of the One 20 8 related initiatives. Priority B - 201 , plans of subdivi 7 8 , parcels. 201 3 + includes the consideration and relative prioritization of a 4 late 2021 - plans of subdivision received 3 . 2019 , units 2019 - KGMP are future plans, all of which require future works/applications. Although lands 963 Priority A and B lands consist of Achievements 2017 8 Additionally in these years Areas two 21 Priority A than 20 Intensification 20120 -- several growth areas. In 7 19 plans (pending) for a total of + more 4 future 2 6 KGMP 201Since the KGMP the OMB) indraft approved. containing a total of KGMP 20The outlook for the significant number of parcels of land and growthrecommended prioritization of land parcels: The recommended1circulation and indicated as Priority C may be the lowest priority for development applications, there are often initiatives recommended to be undertaken and completed submission of development applications during the upcoming 2The approach to growth management is not just about prioritizing the number of plans of subdivision and dwelling units. Important conallocation of resources towards conducting studies that are needed before development can be considered along with completing initiatives that are required to move lands from draft approval to registration and construction. These initiatives include proceeding with environmental assessments and detailed design for roads, sanitary servicing infrastructure and improvements, intersection upgrades, new cycling path construction, PARTS Plans, and par 1 - 15 8 . -- are . The to be overall parcels (Green land that significant and .Overall potential a items, are parcels of section of this report individual land , along with each type of complete communities parcel based on the Growth Area Subplan residential floor space, jobs - is generic to all planning Map for land h priority colour and label r that corresponds to the parcel is grouped into the six KGMS goals is the area specific analysis, area ), has a shows individual whic d Greenfield Areas that are not fully etc. analysis Subplans component KGMP Summary Map The area comments may include an indication of Area Monitoring Report. are also indicated. There may be properties that could be Criteria for Staging of Development Summary the plan of subdivision, vacant land condominium, reas area specific analysis ) and Growth . The assignment of a relative udget Forecast and Development Charges Background Study. analysis, along with the overall criteria for staging of development e . Th growth area shown on the & jobs per hectare). This component is similar to the information from the Growth Management ) is described in the Relative Priority ranking. C - oric Staging of Development. area specific analysis or potentially subject to ( KGMP Summary Map : B, Red e plan but could be considered Site Specific Intensification Opportunities - AGrowth Management Plan Each parcel has a unique parcel identification numbe and the first component includes the green infrastructure is subject to refinement and the locations may change through the Kitchener Growth Management Plan (KGMP) Summary Map ubplan is comprised of two components. The first Appendix Kitchener The are subject todevelopment applications in growth areas within the Designatedeveloped via plan of subdivision or the like that are within the Built Boundary Line. These are not shown on thcriteriaA, Orange Parcel identification numbers are shown that correspond to information in the Growth Area Subplan tables and the histThe KGMP Summary Map also includes the conceptual location of proposed new sanitary trunk sewers and sanitary pumping stations that may be required to service growth. This infrastructure is Development Charge project numbers are indicated for major engineering infrastructure. The conceptual location for future city parkland (parks and open space) is also indicated. This engineering and development process.Planning Community/Growth Area SubplansEach planning community/intensification area (Mixed Use Nodes, Mixed Use Corridors, Scomments and major initiatives list. The second is the parcel specific map and information. The communities/growth areas and intensification areas. This and is primarily qualitativeprovides the basis foroutstanding park and recreation facilities requirements, engineering infrastructure, or other community infrastructure or may include an indication if some of the major elementsin place. Major initiatives are indicated with potential timing. The second component includes a more detailed map of the growth area with shown.information indicated in the table. The information includes potential dwelling units by type, nonresidential land use areas, and estimated number of new residents, nonand density (residents historical Staging of Development report and utilizes the same parcel ID number. greenfield and intensification area inventory totals, along with other summary datidentified in the Annual 1 - 16 9 3 10111213141517192123252830333538414 ______________________________32 _____________________________ ________________________ ) _ 3A - ification Opportunities Growth Area SubplansUrban Growth CentreMixed Use CorridorsNodes (Mixed Use/Primary)Neighbourhood Mixed Use CentresSite Specific IntensBridgeport NorthGrand River NorthGrand River SouthHidden ValleyDoon South Phase 1Doon South Phase 2BrigadoonBrigadoon SouthDundee North (Name TBDHuronHuron SouthRosenberg____Laurentian West Phase 1Laurentian West Phase 3B 1 - 17 10 high. - complete deferred from CRoZBy wide sanitary model ) - Existing capacity outsideN/ALow --- High employment location.Included. MediumHighest.Recent improvementPotentially included. Med.Potentially high.DstrTBDExisting. None proposed.N/AIncludes most existing. Potential contribution to.CcommunityCIncludes. Potential.Existing urban designation. PARTS CentralUpdated OP policies in place UGC stage 1. Timing TBDCitycomplete.Low. Low. CPositive now that DCs are no longer exempt downtownMedium. Streetscape/roads along with MTSAs. GROWTH AREA SUBPLAN This location is the focus of 225 RJs/ha by 2031. in an Effective and Impacts 4: Foster a Strong Economy TimingTimingTiming Goal Provision of Industrial/Employment LandsAccessibility to Employment LandsEffective Use of Existing InfrastructureHousing to Support EmploymentBrownfield Redevelopment OpportunitiesImpact on Attraction of TalentGoal 5: Strengthen CommunitiesActive Park ProvisionLeisure/Community FacilitiesProvision of Social/CulturalSchool AccommodationAffordable Housing ProvisionGoal 6: Manage Change Coordinated MannerOfficial Plan StatusCommunity/Secondary Plan StatusNhbd. Concept Plan/Master Plan StatusZoning StatusStatus of Master Engineering PlansImpact on Cost of Engineering infrastructureImpact on Cost of Community FacilitiesImpact on Cost of School ProvisionDevelopment ChargeMaintenance Implications . . 2019 The Official Plan includes a target density of Area Specific Priority Analysis . Fall RJs/ha by 2019 istrict Energy 25 High service. d . RJs/ha in cture is in place. Development applications ongoing. Lands include rail and bus terminal, modal hub - 189 1 exist multi guidelines anticipated Electricity constraints emerging .dwellings only location. Subject to Clean Water Act and ROP requirements.N/ANoneHeritage resources identifiedPrime location, more potentialLowest. Distributed electricity and possibleRevised Includes existing, potential for moreMultiple King St completeContributes to mandated 22031Includes Exist. Improvements done. Exist.Region Prime High. TDM pilot project. Primary infrastru RJs/ha in 2001 to an estimated Conservation Denotes Critical Factor * Impact on Heating/Electric (Feature, Designation, Goal 1: Enhance our Valued Natural and Cultural Heritage ResourcesSource Water Protection Area Subwatershed/Drainage Study Natural Heritage ConservationOwnership)Cultural Heritage ConservationEnergy Goal 2: Create Vibrant Urban PlacesStatus of Urban Design GuidelinesMixture of Land UsesType of Housing ProposedStatus of Streetscape Projects*Contribution to Places to GrowNumerical TargetsGoal 3: Ensure Greater Transportation ChoiceTransit Status Regional StreetsCity StreetsImpact on Cycling Master PlanPedestrian Charter/WalkabilityContribution to TDM sidential is targeted to balance employment growth. The density has increased from 120 . 2028 - A1 TBD Inside 2027 intensification Intensification area Proposed TimingExisting, intensification focus of the primary is UGC The Urban Growth Centre Applications Remaining Initiatives Major New UGC ZoningInnovation District Parking StructureDevelopment LocationRelation to Built BoundaryComplete Community StatusGeneral Comments: employment, institutional, arts and culture and government. Increased re 1 - 18 11 he Five of t parks IDed in designation General Comments: wide sanitary model complete. - Existing CapacityN/ALow --- GROWTH AREA SUBPLAN No new industrial providedWalkable, connectionsExist. High.Potential medium.Potentially includes.Potentially medium.Exist. New potential PARTS areas TBDExist. New potential TBDN/AExist. Potential for new.CCSignificant potentialExisting urbanNeighbourhood Planning Review in progress.N/Aupdated through CRoZBy stage 1CityNone identified Potentially lowCTypically very positiveLow. Streetscape. Engineering infrastructure TimingTimingTiming all 7 corridors. Development applications are ongoing. Goal 4: Foster a Strong EconomyProvision of Industrial/Employment LandsAccessibility to Employment LandsEffective Use of Existing InfrastructureHousing to Support EmploymentBrownfield Redevelopment OpportunitiesImpact on Attraction of TalentGoal 5: Strengthen CommunitiesActive Park ProvisionLeisure/Community FacilitiesProvision of Social/CulturalSchool AccommodationAffordable Housing ProvisionGoal 6: Manage Change in an Effective and Coordinated MannerOfficial Plan StatusCommunity/Secondary Plan StatusNhbd. Concept Plan/Master Plan StatusZoning StatusStatus of Master Engineering PlansImpact on Cost of Impact on Cost of Community FacilitiesImpact on Cost of School ProvisionDevelopment Charge ImpactsMaintenance Implications Fall is in place for all 7 corridors. Development applications are ongoing. guidelines anticipated Post 2031 pot. Issue. . Subject to Clean Water Act and ROP requirements.N/APrimarily none. Portion of Lancaster MUC includes Grand R., floodplain, significant valleyland.Heritage resources identifiedIn some devt. proposalsLow. Revised 2019Exist. Potential on site.MultiplesComplete (Queen S, Victoria, Belmont, King E)underwayYes, res. devt contributes to intensification level targetExisting high service (most)Many within RT areaExist.Exist.Belmont Exist. New connections proposedPotentially highPotentially high. is in place for Factor Conservation Places to Grow Numerical Denotes Critical 1: Enhance our Valued Natural and * Impact on Heating/Electric (Feature, Designation, Ownership) Area Specific Priority AnalysisGoal Cultural Heritage ResourcesSource Water Protection Area Subwatershed/Drainage Study Natural Heritage ConservationCultural Heritage Energy ConservationGoal 2: Create Vibrant Urban PlacesStatus of Urban Design GuidelinesMixture of Land UsesType of Housing ProposedStatus of Streetscape ProjectsContribution to TargetsGoal 3: Ensure Greater Transportation ChoiceTransit Status Regional StreetsCity StreetsImpact on Cycling Master PlanPedestrian Charter/WalkabilityContribution to TDM 2021 2021 - -* 2019 2019 Proposed TimingInsideIntensification Area Existing, intensification Mixed Use Corridors are major streets that lead into the Urban Growth Centre jor streets that lead into the Urban Growth Centre Five of the Mixed Use Corridors Plans Schneider Creek Watercourse Projects Major Remaining InitiativesNeighbourhood Planning ReviewDevelopment LocationRelation to Built BoundaryComplete Community StatusGeneral Comments: Mixed Use Corridors are ma 1 - 19 12 parks IDed provided high wide sanitary model - Existing capacityN/ALow --- No new industrialExist or planned connectionExist, may require upgradeLikely narrow rangePotential (gas stations)Potentially Exist. New potential in PARTS areasTBDPrimarily exist. N/ASome incl. More reqd TBDCCPotentialExisting urbanPARTS Plans for Block Line / Fairway forthcoming N/AMost updated through CRoZBy stage 1 Citycomplete.TBD pending studyPotentially lowCTypically very positivePotentially low. Streetscape. GROWTH AREA SUBPLAN Plan Status TimingTimingTiming Goal 4: Foster a Strong EconomyProvision of Industrial/Employment LandsAccessibility to Employment LandsEffective Use of Existing InfrastructureHousing to Support EmploymentBrownfield Redevelopment OpportunitiesImpact on Attraction of TalentGoal 5: Strengthen CommunitiesActive Park ProvisionLeisure/Community FacilitiesProvision of Social/CulturalSchool AccommodationAffordable Housing ProvisionGoal 6: Manage Change in an Effective and Coordinated MannerOfficial Plan StatusCommunity/Secondary Nhbd. Concept Plan/Master Plan StatusZoning StatusStatus of Master Engineering PlansImpact on Cost of Engineering infrastructureImpact on Cost of Community FacilitiesImpact on Cost of School ProvisionDevelopment Charge ImpactsMaintenance Implications , , res. devt mainly private LRT and RT planned . guidelines anticipated 2019 Subject to Clean Water Act and ROP requirements.Complete, N/ASeveral incl. floodplain, small woodland in Block Line/Strasburg, Potentially highPotentially lowRevised Fall Existing. High site potentialMultiple dwellingMay be reqd (City/Region)Depending on locationcontributes to intensification level target & Many w. existexisting or On existingExistingServiced by multiple existing and proposed routesIncl destinations, impr. reqdPotentially high Analysis Denotes Critical Factor * (Feature, Designation, Ownership)Impact on Heating/Electric Area Specific Priority Goal 1: Enhance our Valued Natural and Cultural Heritage ResourcesSource Water Protection Area Subwatershed/Drainage Study Natural Heritage ConservationCultural Heritage ConservationEnergy ConservationGoal 2: Create Vibrant Urban PlacesStatus of Urban Design GuidelinesMixture of Land UsesType of Housing ProposedStatus of Streetscape ProjectsContribution to Places to Grow Numerical TargetsGoal 3: Ensure Greater Transportation ChoiceTransit Status Regional StreetsCity StreetsImpact on Cycling Master PlanPedestrian Charter/WalkabilityContribution to TDM are complete. and Forcemain 2021 - * 2020 Proposed TimingInside, except 3 sitesIntensification AreaMostly existing Fairway (Mixed Use/Primary) Upgrades to the Freeport Pumping Station Plans Block Line/ . Nodes / Secondary Major Remaining InitiativesPARTS Development PlansLocationRelation to Built BoundaryType (Intensification Area/Complete Community StatusGeneral Comments 1 - 20 13 Mediummedium wide sanitary model -- - Existing capacityN/ALow --- No new industrial providedLowExist. May require upgradeLowLowLowExisting. Any new TBDN/AExistingN/APotential on siteCCPotentialExisting urbanN/A, Rescinded, ApprovedN/AMost updated through CRoZBy stage 1 Citycomplete.TBD pending study.LowCTypically very positiveLikely revenue>cost GROWTH AREA SUBPLAN Provision of Talent Social/Cultural Housing Provision Cost of Engineering infrastructure TimingTimingTiming Goal 4: Foster a Strong EconomyProvision of Industrial/Employment LandsAccessibility to Employment LandsEffective Use of Existing InfrastructureHousing to Support EmploymentBrownfield Redevelopment OpportunitiesImpact on Attraction Goal 5: Strengthen CommunitiesActive Park ProvisionLeisure/Community FacilitiesProvision of School AccommodationAffordable Goal 6: Manage Change in an Effective and Coordinated MannerOfficial Plan StatusCommunity/Secondary Plan StatusNhbd. Concept Plan/Master Plan StatusZoning StatusStatus of Master Engineering PlansImpact on Impact on Cost of Community FacilitiesImpact on Cost of School Development Charge ImpactsMaintenance Implications low - . guidelines anticipated 2019 Subject to Clean Water Act and ROP requirements.N/A, completeNonePotential. None proposed.Potentially medium.Revised Fall Permitted. Primarily commercial plaza now.MultipleTBDRes. Development contributes to intensification level targetMainly existing (30min)ExistExistServiced by multiple existing and proposed routesPotentially mediumPotential medium Heritage Conservation Denotes Critical Factor * Impact on Heating/Electric (Feature, Designation, Ownership) Area Specific Priority AnalysisGoal 1: Enhance our Valued Natural and Cultural Heritage ResourcesSource Water Protection Area Subwatershed/Drainage Study Natural Cultural Heritage ConservationEnergy ConservationGoal 2: Create Vibrant Urban PlacesStatus of Urban Design GuidelinesMixture of Land UsesType of Housing ProposedStatus of Streetscape ProjectsContribution to Places to Grow Numerical TargetsGoal 3: Ensure Greater Transportation ChoiceTransit Status Regional StreetsCity StreetsImpact on Cycling Master PlanPedestrian Charter/WalkabilityContribution to TDM * through Crozby Stage 1 Proposed TimingInside, except 1Intensification AreaExisting, 1 partial updated Most Zoning General Comments: Neighbourhood Mixed Use Centres Major Remaining InitiativesDevelopment PlansLocationRelation to Built BoundaryComplete Community Status 1 - 21 14 005). in (2 positive pending LowHigh -- Medium wide sanitary model - - Existing capacityN/ALow --- No new industrial providedLowExisting. Potential upgradeMediumMediumMediumExisting. Any new TBDN/AExistingN/APotential on siteCCPotentialExisting urbanChanges in new OPSec. Plan review progress/N/AVarious stages of CRoZByCitycomplete.TBD pending study.LowCTypically very Likely revenue>cost GROWTH AREA SUBPLAN Employment Strong Economy TimingTimingTiming Goal 4: Foster a Provision of Industrial/Employment LandsAccessibility to Employment LandsEffective Use of Existing InfrastructureHousing to Support Brownfield Redevelopment OpportunitiesImpact on Attraction of TalentGoal 5: Strengthen CommunitiesActive Park ProvisionLeisure/Community FacilitiesProvision of Social/CulturalSchool AccommodationAffordable Housing ProvisionGoal 6: Manage Change in an Effective and Coordinated MannerOfficial Plan StatusCommunity/Secondary Plan StatusNhbd. Concept Plan/Master Plan StatusZoning StatusStatus of Master Engineering PlansImpact on Cost of Engineering infrastructureImpact on Cost of Community FacilitiesImpact on Cost of School ProvisionDevelopment Charge ImpactsMaintenance Implications Area Specific Priority Analysis . enhance, unknown guidelines anticipated Development contributes to 2019 Subject to Clean Water Act and ROP requirements.N/ATypically nonePotential opportunitiesPotentially low. Revised Fall Potential to include.Multiples, townsVarious.Res. intensification level targetExisting ExistingExistingExisting, Allows improvementsPotential medium ies. Conservation Denotes Critical Factor * Impact on Heating/Electric (Feature, Designation, Ownership) Goal 1: Enhance our Valued Natural and Cultural Heritage ResourcesSource Water Protection Area Subwatershed/Drainage Study Natural Heritage ConservationCultural Heritage ConservationEnergy Goal 2: Create Vibrant Urban PlacesStatus of Urban Design GuidelinesMixture of Land UsesType of Housing ProposedStatus of Streetscape ProjectsContribution to Places to Grow Numerical TargetsGoal 3: Ensure Greater Transportation ChoiceTransit Status Regional StreetsCity StreetsImpact on Cycling Master PlanPedestrian Charter/WalkabilityContribution to TDM 2021 - Ongoing 2020 Proposed Timing InsideIntensification AreaExisting, intensification law - There are currently more than 425 SSIOs identified in the city. These include potential brownfields, greyfields Review of Zoning By See general comments below. Currently the SSIO locations Site Specific Intensification Opportunities (SSIOs) Note:cannot be shown.Major Remaining InitiativesComprehensive Residential (CRoZBy)Development PlansLocationRelation to Built BoundaryComplete Community StatusGeneral Comments: Additional opportunities may exist. Many sites may be proposed for a change in use from existing uses for a range of densit 1 - 22 15 rtial Upgrade. unbuilt medium - lowHigh -- TBD - Pumping stn. medium. Mainly vehicle - requires new existing site, unbuilt - - NoneLowExist. Potentially highNoMedium1 City & 1 Nhbd Park ExistNo additional plannedNone proposedCPC & P NoneExisting urbanN/AN/ANew zoning through CRoZBy stage 1 and pending stage 2CompleteExist, lowPotentially lowMediumSome, primarily revenueMedium GROWTH AREA SUBPLAN . New housing increases need for unbuilt school in pa have been lifted Strengthen Communities TimingTimingTiming Goal 4: Foster a Strong EconomyProvision of Industrial/Employment LandsAccessibility to Employment LandsEffective Use of Existing InfrastructureHousing to Support EmploymentBrownfield Redevelopment OpportunitiesImpact on Attraction of TalentGoal 5: Active Park ProvisionLeisure/Community FacilitiesProvision of Social/CulturalSchool AccommodationAffordable Housing ProvisionGoal 6: Manage Change in an Effective and Coordinated MannerOfficial Plan StatusCommunity/Secondary Plan StatusNhbd. Concept Plan/Master Plan StatusZoning StatusStatus of Master Engineering PlansImpact on Cost of Engineering infrastructureImpact on Cost of Community FacilitiesImpact on Cost of School ProvisionDevelopment Charge ImpactsMaintenance Implications ; under Act and Area Specific Priority Analysis CHL complete - Designated - . guidelines anticipated 1 exist, 2 proposed 2019 - traffic/development cap and servicing limitations Subject to Clean Water ROP requirements.N/AAdjacent to Grand R., incl. Melitzer Creek (coldwater), GRCA Regulated wetlands, floodplain, valley slopes, wooded areas. Greenlands in public including Kiwanis Park and private ownership.Known Nonreview; knownNone proposedExisting serviced areaRevised Fall Mainly resid. (singles/town)Singles/semis/townsCity of Waterloo to rebuild Woolwich StreetPlanned low service.Improvements Exist, newCity LowLow Regional Previous Numerical Targets /community. Vibrant Urban Places TDM Denotes Critical Factor * Impact on Heating/Electric (Feature, Designation, Ownership) Goal 1: Enhance our Valued Natural and Cultural Heritage ResourcesSource Water Protection Area Subwatershed/Drainage Study Natural Heritage ConservationCultural Heritage ConservationEnergy ConservationGoal 2: CreateStatus of Urban Design GuidelinesMixture of Land UsesType of Housing ProposedStatus of Streetscape ProjectsContribution to Places to Grow Goal 3: Ensure Greater Transportation ChoiceTransit Status Regional StreetsCity StreetsImpact on Cycling Master PlanPedestrian Charter/WalkabilityContribution to complete the neighbourhood 2025 - 2024 Proposed TimingBothPartial existing One stage of remaining subdivision to be registered which will Station Upgrade Bridgeport North Falconridge pumping station upgrade is primarily related to growth in Waterloo. Major Remaining InitiativesFalconridge Pumping LocationRelation to Built BoundaryComplete Community StatusGeneral Comments: community. 1 - 23 16 1 - 24 17 CRoZBy through TBD - High and pending stage 2- AREA SUBPLAN full) Existing inside communityN/ALow --- Exist. industrialAdjacent (Shirley Ave), exist. connections + futureExistingYesSome potentialLow1 District & Nhbd Park Exist, 1 proposedProposed Existing & in adj. communityN/AAdjacent communitiesC(school CPotentialExisting urbanRescindedN/ANew zoningstage 1N/APotentially lowPotentially lowCSome, primarily revenueMedium GROWTH rtional share of Ottawa Trunk Sewer costs. Engineering infrastructure Redevelopment Opportunities TimingTimingTiming Goal 4: Foster a Strong EconomyProvision of Industrial/Employment LandsAccessibility to Employment LandsEffective Use of Existing InfrastructureHousing to Support EmploymentBrownfield Impact on Attraction of TalentGoal 5: Strengthen CommunitiesActive Park ProvisionLeisure/Community FacilitiesProvision of Social/CulturalSchool AccommodationAffordable Housing ProvisionGoal 6: Manage Change in an Effective and Coordinated MannerOfficial Plan StatusCommunity/Secondary Plan StatusNhbd. Concept Plan/Master Plan StatusZoning StatusStatus of Master Engineering PlansImpact on Cost of Impact on Cost of Community FacilitiesImpact on Cost of School ProvisionDevelopment Charge ImpactsMaintenance Implications Area Specific Priority Analysis . density to designated; known Grand R., Kolb - . 3 exist, 2 proposed guidelines anticipated , GRCA Regulated 4 exist, 2 proposed mediummedium 2019 - -- Subject to Clean Water Act and ROP requirements.N/AAdjacent to Creekwetland, wooded areas, floodplain, valley slopes, mainly in public ownership w/ some privateKnown nonCHLNone proposed.Currently low, exist.Revised Fall Community incl commercial, future high & low rise resid.Multiple, towns, singlesNone planned. Potential for signifLow. Future planned corridorExist. Prop. Ottawa corridorExist, newRegion City LowLow Design Guidelines Denotes Critical Factor * Impact on Heating/Electric (Feature, Designation, Ownership) Goal 1: Enhance our Valued Natural and Cultural Heritage ResourcesSource Water Protection Area Subwatershed/Drainage Study Natural Heritage ConservationCultural Heritage ConservationEnergy ConservationGoal 2: Create Vibrant Urban PlacesStatus of Urban Mixture of Land UsesType of Housing ProposedStatus of Streetscape ProjectsContribution to Places to Grow Numerical TargetsGoal 3: Ensure Greater Transportation ChoiceTransit Status Regional StreetsCity StreetsImpact on Cycling Master PlanPedestrian Charter/WalkabilityContribution to TDM 02206 (Hallman) are dependent upon each other for servicing, a second means of access, and both require contribution of propo - ing 91005 (Gies) and 30T - 2025 - 30T 2024 Proposed Timing BothWould complete exist The two remaining subdivision plans, Grand River North Pumping Station Upgrade ) Forwell Major Remaining InitiativesOtterbien (LocationRelation to Built BoundaryType Complete Community StatusGeneral Comments: Completion of the community is a high priority. 1 - 25 18 1 - 26 19 costs, . highhigh -- medium (future +) - existing site, Unbuilt requires new UnbuiltHigh of Fairway complete o new industrial provided-- NLowExisting (pumping stn). Requires storage facility.Potentially mediumNoLowNew zoning through CRoZBy St. and pending stage 2TBDIn adjacent communitiesAdjacent communitiesCPTBDLow. Aff ownership potentialExisting urbanApprovedCompleteNew zoning through CRoZBy stage 1 and pending stage 2SLow LowDSome, primarily revenuePotentially medium GROWTH AREA SUBPLAN Lands Plan/Master Plan Status Social/Cultural Future plans require contribution of proportional share to Ottawa Trunk Sewer TimingTimingTiming Goal 4: Foster a Strong EconomyProvision of Industrial/Employment LandsAccessibility to Employment Effective Use of Existing InfrastructureHousing to Support EmploymentBrownfield Redevelopment OpportunitiesImpact on Attraction of TalentGoal 5: Strengthen CommunitiesActive Park ProvisionLeisure/Community FacilitiesProvision of * School AccommodationAffordable Housing ProvisionGoal 6: Manage Change in an Effective and Coordinated MannerOfficial Plan StatusCommunity/Secondary Plan StatusNhbd. Concept Zoning StatusStatus of Master Engineering PlansImpact on Cost of Engineering infrastructureImpact on Cost of Community FacilitiesImpact on Cost of School ProvisionDevelopment Charge ImpactsMaintenance Implications - Area Specific Priority Analysis min walk - and some Major infrastructure existing. . ; known CHLmedium rise) - . 2 exist, 2 proposed low guidelines anticipated - .3 exist, 2 proposed 2019 - Subject to Clean Water Act and ROP requirements.Subject to Idlewood Creek Master Drainage PlanESPAs (#24, 25), Grand R., Idlewood Cr., Chicopee Cr. wetlands, floodplain, valleylands, woodlands. Large portion in private ownershippublicDesignated and Known NonDesignatedNone proposedExisting, mediumRevised Fall Commty. planned to includeMixed (lowNone proposedPlannedFairway extension completedExist, newRegion City E. of Zeller to be 5Medium Woolner Tr. and S. of Fairway Rd Projects Heritage Conservation Denotes Critical Factor * Impact on Heating/Electric (Feature, Designation, Ownership) Goal 1: Enhance our Valued Natural and Cultural Heritage ResourcesSource Water Protection Area Subwatershed/Drainage Study Natural Heritage ConservationCultural Energy ConservationGoal 2: Create Vibrant Urban PlacesStatus of Urban Design GuidelinesMixture of Land UsesType of Housing ProposedStatus of StreetscapeContribution to Places to Grow Numerical TargetsGoal 3: Ensure Greater Transportation ChoiceTransit Status Regional StreetsCity StreetsImpact on Cycling Master PlanPedestrian Charter/WalkabilityContribution to TDM outside Proposed Timing MostlyWould complete existing Completion of community is a high priority. : A Heritage Impact Assessment, and other studies, are required prior to future development E. of Grand River South Initiatives Major Remaining NoneLocationRelation to Built BoundaryComplete Community StatusGeneral Commentsextension of watermain. 1 - 27 20 1 - 28 21 Studies . New park proposed Existing capacity outside N/ALow --- Potential in community.Potential & adjacent to exist.Add. infrastructure requiredPotential.None/unknownMedium1 existingTBDNone in community.None in community.CcommunityCNoExisting urban designation. Special Policies re: timing UnderwayUnderwayNew zoning pending CRoZBy and Planning Indiv. Servicing/SWM reqd.Pot. medium None identified.CTBD, potentially significantPotential medium GROWTH AREA SUBPLAN Lands TimingTimingTiming Goal 4: Foster a Strong EconomyProvision of Industrial/EmploymentAccessibility to Employment LandsEffective Use of Existing InfrastructureHousing to Support EmploymentBrownfield Redevelopment OpportunitiesImpact on Attraction of TalentGoal 5: Strengthen CommunitiesActive Park ProvisionLeisure/Community FacilitiesProvision of Social/CulturalSchool AccommodationAffordable Housing ProvisionGoal 6: Manage Change in an Effective and Coordinated MannerOfficial Plan Status* Community/Secondary Plan StatusNhbd. Concept Plan/Master Plan StatusZoning StatusStatus of Master Engineering PlansImpact on Cost of Engineering infrastructureImpact on Cost of Community FacilitiesImpact on Cost of School ProvisionDevelopment Charge ImpactsMaintenance Implications ; known complete Area Specific Priority Analysis Wide mix . Wabanaki ext Wabanaki ext. - Designated - River Rd EA . 1 proposed guidelines anticipated 1 proposed 2019 ks, habitat, woodland, Grand contribute to greenfield Subject to Clean Water Act and ROP requirements.Add. works may be requiredIncl. Core Environmental Features, ESPA (#27), PSWs, creeR. floodplain, slope hazardsprivate ownership, comprehensive EIS requiredKnown NonCHLNone proposed. Potential.Medium.Revised Fall Existing singles only.proposedFull range proposedNew constr. Will density target.Ex. routes adjacentRequired. New constr. Region City Currently low. Currently low. Land Use Study underway. ION Stage 2 route parallel to new River Road through Hidden Valley. . Transportation led Environmental Assessment - Denotes Critical Factor * through a City Impact on Heating/Electric (Feature, Designation, Ownership) Goal 1: Enhance our Valued Natural and Cultural Heritage ResourcesSource Water Protection Area Subwatershed/Drainage Study * Natural Heritage ConservationCultural Heritage ConservationEnergy ConservationGoal 2: Create Vibrant Urban PlacesStatus of Urban Design GuidelinesMixture of Land UsesType of Housing ProposedStatus of Streetscape ProjectsContribution to Places to Grow Numerical TargetsGoal 3: Ensure Greater ChoiceTransit Status * Regional StreetsCity StreetsImpact on Cycling Master PlanPedestrian Charter/WalkabilityContribution to TDM )) 20212024 -- 202120212027 --- 2023 202020202026 development areas to be determined Proposed Timing (Region 2020(Region BothPartial existing/limited service Manitou) - Hidden Valley Sanitary requirements for future Hidden Valley Rd) - Secondary Plan, Zoning, (Hidden Valley(King Major Remaining InitiativesRiver Road River Road Hidden Valley Studies Upper Hidden Sewage Facility EA Upper Hidden Sewage Facility Design & ConstLocationRelation to Built Boundary (In/Out)Complete Community StatusGeneral Comments: 1 - 29 22 1 - 30 23 SUBPLAN outside community medium. - Existing TBDMedium --- No new industrial providedPrimarily vehicular onlyMainly exist. Some new.Potentially highNoneLowUnder Devt, additional open space proposedN/AMain facilities out of commtyNoneC(schools full)CVery low potentialExisting urbanCompleteComplete (private)New zoning through CRoZBy stage 1 and pending stage 2CompleteCompleteLow. New park devt budgetCNow primarily revenueMedium GROWTH AREA Doon South Greenspace Management Plan (rev. 1996), the Support Employment Implementation Report TimingTimingTiming Goal 4: Foster a Strong EconomyProvision of Industrial/Employment LandsAccessibility to Employment LandsEffective Use of Existing InfrastructureHousing toBrownfield Redevelopment OpportunitiesImpact on Attraction of TalentGoal 5: Strengthen CommunitiesActive Park ProvisionLeisure/Community FacilitiesProvision of Social/CulturalSchool AccommodationAffordable Housing ProvisionGoal 6: Manage Change in an Effective and Coordinated MannerOfficial Plan StatusCommunity/Secondary Plan StatusNhbd. Concept Plan/Master Plan StatusZoning StatusStatus of Master Engineering PlansImpact on Cost of Engineering infrastructureImpact on Cost of Community FacilitiesImpact on Cost of School ProvisionDevelopment Charge ImpactsMaintenance Implications -(1991) and + species some Area Specific Priority Analysis , BBB planned - , updated ; known CHL . 1 exist, 1 proposed City guidelines anticipated floodplain, slope hazards, , . Some private, some new service location - 2019 some exist, connection Subject to Clean Water Act and ROP requirements.Subject to StrasburgDoon Cr. Master Watershed PlansIncludes ESPAs (#30, 34, 35), PSWswoodlands, creeks and at riskpublic ownership.Designated and Known NonDesignatedNone proposedMed.Revised Fall Primarily singles/towns, nhbd. commercialSingle/semi/townsNew developmentbelow, some aboveLeast accessibleNoneExist, plannedproposedRegion -completion proposedLow destination, Med. recr.Low Vibrant Urban Places Cycling Master Plan Strasburg Creek Master Watershed Plan and Implementation Report Denotes Critical Factor and * Impact on Heating/Electric (Feature, Designation, Ownership) Goal 1: Enhance our Valued Natural and Cultural Heritage ResourcesSource Water Protection Area Subwatershed/Drainage Study Natural Heritage ConservationCultural Heritage ConservationEnergy ConservationGoal 2: CreateStatus of Urban Design GuidelinesMixture of Land UsesType of Housing ProposedStatus of Streetscape ProjectsContribution to Places to Grow Numerical TargetsGoal 3: Ensure Greater Transportation ChoiceTransit Status Regional StreetsCity StreetsImpact onPedestrian Charter/WalkabilityContribution to TDM BothPartial existing Doon South Creek Subwatershed Master Plan (1994) In addition to the Doon South Phase I is also a guiding document for natural heritage conservation. LocationRelation to Built BoundaryComplete Community StatusGeneral Comments:(2003) 1 - 31 24 1 - 32 25 ver, high - TBD through CRoZBy future parks high - medium. - requires new, Unbuilt, site - Some lands currently zonedPrimarily vehicular onlyNew infrastructure requiredPotentially highNoneLowExisting. 3 TBDMain facilities out of commtyTBDCidentified; P TBDLow potentialCompleteCompleted through OMBN/ANew zoning stage 1 and pending stage 2High level complete, detail reqdPotential high, TBDTBDMediumYes, infrastructure reqd.Potentially medium GROWTH AREA SUBPLAN Cost of Engineering infrastructure TimingTimingTiming Goal 4: Foster a Strong EconomyProvision of Industrial/Employment LandsAccessibility to Employment LandsEffective Use of Existing InfrastructureHousing to Support EmploymentBrownfield Redevelopment OpportunitiesImpact on Attraction of TalentGoal 5: Strengthen CommunitiesActive Park ProvisionLeisure/Community FacilitiesProvision of Social/CulturalSchool AccommodationAffordable Housing ProvisionGoal 6: Manage Change in an Effective and Coordinated MannerOfficial Plan StatusCommunity/Secondary Plan StatusNhbd. Concept Plan/Master Plan StatusZoning StatusStatus of Master Engineering Plans*Impact on Impact on Cost of Community FacilitiesImpact on Cost of School Provision*Development Charge Impacts*Maintenance Implications - portion of development could proceed prior to the completion of the Strasburg Road extension; howe Area Specific Priority Analysis planned - large Primarily in . floodplain, slope ; under review; known . 1 exist, 1 proposed City PSWs wooded areas, ESPAs (#33, 34, 37 39), guidelines anticipated 2019 5 proposed Subject to Clean Water Act and ROP requirements.BBB Creeks Subwatershed Study (1997), Functional Drainage Study (2009) Includes Blair Creek, hazards,species at riskprivate ownership.Designated and Known NonDesignatedCHLLimited Requires significant extend.Revised Fall Primarily singles/towns, nhbd. commercialSingle/semi/townsNew developmentMany plans below the general targetLeast accessibleNew Dundee upgrade pendingNew requiredRegion -Potentially MedLow pumping station. A II the Doon South utilizing he remainder Denotes Critical Factor * with t Impact on Heating/Electric Goal 1: Enhance our Valued Natural and Cultural Heritage ResourcesSource Water Protection Area Subwatershed/Drainage Study Natural Heritage Conservation (Feature, Designation, Ownership) Cultural Heritage ConservationEnergy ConservationGoal 2: Create Vibrant Urban PlacesStatus of Urban Design GuidelinesMixture of Land UsesType of Housing ProposedStatus of Streetscape ProjectsContribution to Places to Grow Numerical TargetsGoal 3: Ensure Greater Transportation ChoiceTransit Status Regional StreetsCity StreetsImpact on Cycling Master PlanPedestrian Charter/WalkabilityContribution to TDM exst 2026) - 20252025 . -- ) 2020 - 2023202315M $ the Homer Watson pumping station Proposed Timing (Region OutsideNew. Part of partial cost is ated Hwy) - total estim (South Section) the road ( : A portion of the lands can utilize s Initiatives Doon South Phase 2 require build out Major Remaining Strasburg Road ExtensionStrasburg Road Watermain (South Section)New Dundee Rd (Fisher HallmanLocationRelation to Built BoundaryTypeComplete Community StatusGeneral Commentsfull 1 - 33 26 1 - 34 27 1 - 35 28 2 high - outside community TBDMedium exist. outside commty(SF) proposed Nhbd Park --- None (empl. changed to comm.)Adjacent to major empl.Exist. Trunk sewer ext. reqd. for some devt.MediumLikely noneLow1Not in planning communityN/AAdj. to institutional. None in.CCPotential low.Existing urbanApprovedN/A (except MU site)New zoning through CRoZBy stage 1 and pending stageCompleteMediumLow CYes, infrastructure reqd.Potentially medium. GROWTH AREA SUBPLAN Economy Attraction of Talent TimingTimingTiming Goal 4: Foster a StrongProvision of Industrial/Employment LandsAccessibility to Employment LandsEffective Use of Existing InfrastructureHousing to Support EmploymentBrownfield Redevelopment OpportunitiesImpact on Goal 5: Strengthen CommunitiesActive Park ProvisionLeisure/Community FacilitiesProvision of Social/CulturalSchool AccommodationAffordable Housing ProvisionGoal 6: Manage Change in an Effective and Coordinated MannerOfficial Plan StatusCommunity/Secondary Plan StatusNhbd. Concept Plan/Master Plan StatusZoning StatusStatus of Master Engineering PlansImpact on Cost of Engineering infrastructureImpact on Cost of Community FacilitiesImpact on Cost of School ProvisionDevelopment Charge ImpactsMaintenance Implications - EIS , Doon Area Specific Priority Analysis woodlands, PSW, ; known CHL . low guidelines anticipated - includes destination, adj. 3 proposed, 1 existing - 2019 - significant Subject to Clean Water Act and ROP requirements.Strasburg Cr. Master PlanSouth and Blair subwatershed/drainage studiesIncludes ESPA (#30), Strasburg Cr.,floodplain, slope hazards,reqd, mostly public ownership, some privateDesignated and Known NonDesignatedNone proposedMainly existing serviceRevised Fall Mainly single use, 1 MU siteSingles/semi/townsNew developmentdevt.Existing (30 min)NoneExist, Strasburg extension reqd prior to some devt.City Med.to school, employmentMedium Projects Streets Denotes Critical Factor * Impact on Heating/Electric (Feature, Designation, Ownership) Goal 1: Enhance our Valued Natural and Cultural Heritage ResourcesSource Water Protection Area Subwatershed/Drainage Study Natural Heritage ConservationCultural Heritage ConservationEnergy ConservationGoal 2: Create Vibrant Urban PlacesStatus of Urban Design GuidelinesMixture of Land UsesType of Housing ProposedStatus of Streetscape Contribution to Places to Grow Numerical TargetsGoal 3: Ensure Greater Transportation ChoiceTransit Status Regional City StreetsImpact on Cycling Master PlanPedestrian Charter/WalkabilityContribution to TDM 20222025 -- 2020 20212023 Proposed Timing BothPartial existing Brigadoon arcels are dependent upon extension of roads and services. P Major Remaining InitiativesBiehn Drive Sanitary Sewer EABiehn Drive ExtensionStrasburg Road Extension (South Section)LocationRelation to Built BoundaryComplete Community StatusGeneral Comments: 1 - 36 29 1 - 37 30 he Stras. Rd TBD -- Nhbd Park TBDMedium Exist. outside commty (sf) proposed --- None proposedLimited, fut. Strasburg RdNew reqdTBDLikely noneTBD2TBDTBDTBDCCTBDDesignatedCompleteRequiredNew zoning pending CRoZBySubdivision level reqdPotential mediumTBDCYes, infrastructure reqd.Potential medium potential that are dependent upon t GROWTH AREA SUBPLAN Status to Support Employment TimingTimingTiming Goal 4: Foster a Strong EconomyProvision of Industrial/Employment LandsAccessibility to Employment LandsEffective Use of Existing InfrastructureHousingBrownfield Redevelopment OpportunitiesImpact on Attraction of TalentGoal 5: Strengthen CommunitiesActive Park ProvisionLeisure/Community FacilitiesProvision of Social/CulturalSchool AccommodationAffordable Housing ProvisionGoal 6: Manage Change in an Effective and Coordinated MannerOfficial Plan Community/Secondary Plan StatusNhbd. Concept Plan/Master Plan StatusZoning StatusStatus of Master Engineering Plans*Impact on Cost of Engineering infrastructureImpact on Cost of Community FacilitiesImpact on Cost of School Provision*Development Charge ImpactsMaintenance Implications It primarily consists of two parcels that have subdivision Area Specific Priority Analysis private Brigadoon Transportation Network Analysis and Alignment Study. - . significant woodland, guidelines anticipated 2 proposed 2019 - Strasburg Rd. ext. reqd. Subject to Clean Water Act and ROP requirements.Strasburg Cr. Master WPlanIncludes wetland, requirements of 3 watershed plans (Strasburg, Doon South, Blair),ownershipDesignated; known CHLTBDTBDRevised Fall TBDTBDNewPlanned future routeNoneCity Potential lowPotential low Likely requires a Community Plan amendment. Sewer. Subject to the Doon South Biehn Drive Denotes Critical Factor * Impact on Heating/Electric (Feature, Designation, Ownership) Goal 1: Enhance our Valued Natural and Cultural Heritage ResourcesSource Water Protection Area Subwatershed/Drainage Study Natural Heritage ConservationCultural Heritage ConservationEnergy ConservationGoal 2: Create Vibrant Urban PlacesStatus of Urban Design GuidelinesMixture of Land UsesType of Housing ProposedStatus of Streetscape ProjectsContribution to Places to Grow Numerical TargetsGoal 3: Ensure Greater Transportation ChoiceTransit Status Regional Streets*City StreetsImpact on Cycling Master PlanPedestrian Charter/WalkabilityContribution to TDM 202220252021 --- and services through adjacent plans to the future 2020 202120232019 Proposed Timing OutsideNew , Robert Ferrie Drive extension This growth area is essentially the southern portion of the approved Brigadoon Community Plan area. Brigadoon South Extension (South Section) Boundary Sanitary Sewer EA iveive Extension Major Remaining InitiativesBiehn DrBiehn DrStrasburg Road Southwest Kitchener Transportation StudyLocationRelation to BuiltComplete Community StatusGeneral Comments: extension of Strasburg Road 1 - 38 31 1 - 39 32 ry land use TBD in TBDTBDNew requiredTBDLikely noneTBDTBDTBDTBDTBDTBDTBDTBDUrban Secondary PlanRequiredRequiredRequires amendmentRequiredTBDTBDTBDTBDTBD GROWTH AREA SUBPLAN Opportunities Engineering infrastructure Employment Lands Status TimingTimingTiming Goal 4: Foster a Strong EconomyProvision of Industrial/Employment LandsAccessibility to Effective Use of Existing InfrastructureHousing to Support EmploymentBrownfield Redevelopment Impact on Attraction of TalentGoal 5: Strengthen CommunitiesActive Park ProvisionLeisure/Community FacilitiesProvision of Social/CulturalSchool AccommodationAffordable Housing ProvisionGoal 6: Manage Change in an Effective and Coordinated MannerOfficial Plan Community/Secondary Plan StatusNhbd. Concept Plan/Master Plan StatusZoning StatusStatus of Master Engineering Plans*Impact on Cost of Impact on Cost of Community FacilitiesImpact on Cost of School Provision*Development Charge ImpactsMaintenance Implications Area Specific Priority Analysis lands will use the South Strasburg Trunk Sanitary Sewer with the remainder to use existing or planned sanita BBB Creeks nd secondary plan is being explored. TBD Subject to Clean Water Act and ROP requirements.Mostly Subwatershed Study (1997), Functional Drainage Study (2009)Additional study required. TBDTBDTBDTBDTBDTBDTBDTBDTBDTBDTBDTBD A portion of the collector road EAs a Denotes Critical Factor * Impact on Heating/Electric (Feature, Designation, Ownership) Goal 1: Enhance our Valued Natural and Cultural Heritage ResourcesSource Water Protection Area Subwatershed/Drainage Study Natural Heritage ConservationCultural Heritage ConservationEnergy ConservationGoal 2: Create Vibrant Urban PlacesStatus of Urban Design GuidelinesMixture of Land UsesType of Housing ProposedStatus of Streetscape ProjectsContribution to Places to Grow Numerical TargetsGoal 3: Ensure Greater Transportation ChoiceTransit Status Regional Streets*City StreetsImpact on Cycling Master PlanPedestrian Charter/WalkabilityContribution to TDM 8 Timing 2021202220252022028 ----- 7 20202022 2019202120232022027 Proposed OutsideNone Dundee North (Name TBD) Creek Dr des. and const. Major Remaining InitiativesNew Secondary Plan and supporting technical studies, Southwest Kitchener Transportation StudyBiehn Dr Extension EABiehn Dr Extension des. and const.Strasburg Dr Extension (South Section)Blair Creek Dr EABlairDodge DriveLocationRelation to Built BoundaryComplete Community StatusGeneral Comments: infrastructure (Biehn Dr and Doon South). Final limits to be determined. Transportation study required. Potential to combine 1 - 40 33 Huron prop. Middle 2 pending CRoZBy TBD - mode access - high - Medium - 2012+ P - Incl. Huron Business ParkIncl., multiPortion requires trunk sewer ext., existMediumUnknownLowexist nhbd park, TBDInstitutional withinPublic elementary schoolCLow. Aff. home ownership+Existing urban designatedCompleteN/ANew zoningCompleteRemaining Middle Strasburg Sewer, Huron Rd., Flood C. Str. Potential low. Future South CC can accommodate MediumNow revenue onlyMedium GROWTH AREA SUBPLAN Infrastructure Engineering infrastructure Employment Lands (rev. 1996), additional guiding documents for natural heritage include TimingTimingTiming Goal 4: Foster a Strong EconomyProvision of Industrial/Employment LandsAccessibility to Effective Use of ExistingHousing to Support EmploymentBrownfield Redevelopment OpportunitiesImpact on Attraction of TalentGoal 5: Strengthen CommunitiesActive Park ProvisionLeisure/Community FacilitiesProvision of Social/CulturalSchool AccommodationAffordable Housing ProvisionGoal 6: Manage Change in an Effective and Coordinated MannerOfficial Plan StatusCommunity/Secondary Plan StatusNhbd. Concept Plan/Master Plan StatusZoning StatusStatus of Master Engineering PlansImpact on Cost of Impact on Cost of Community FacilitiesImpact on Cost of School ProvisionDevelopment Charge ImpactsMaintenance Implications , , - Non Area Specific Priority Analysis Implementation Report Medium use pathway - ; known CHL . 2 proposed guidelines anticipated (1991) and Huron Rd reconstruction 1 existing, 3 proposed 2019 Subject to Clean Water Act and ROP requirements.Strasburg Cr. Master WPlanAlder/Upper Stras. Cr. StudyHuron Natural Area, PSW complex, small woodlands, floodplain, slope hazards, Strasburg Creek, mostly public ownershipDesignated and KnownDesignatedLowExisting service Revised Fall Community includes residential, industrial, inst.Remainder single/semi/townMainly new devtemployment proj. accomm.Exist., planned improvementFH Rd improvement pendingExist., completeRegion City Huron Rd multiIncl. or adj. to destinationsPotential medium Places to Grow Numerical (1998). Denotes Critical Factor 2: Create Vibrant Urban Places * Impact on Heating/Electric (Feature, Designation, Ownership) Goal 1: Enhance our Valued Natural and Cultural Heritage ResourcesSource Water Protection Area Subwatershed/Drainage Study Natural Heritage ConservationCultural Heritage ConservationEnergy ConservationGoal Status of Urban Design GuidelinesMixture of Land UsesType of Housing ProposedStatus of Streetscape ProjectsContribution to TargetsGoal 3: Ensure Greater Transportation ChoiceTransit Status Regional StreetsCity StreetsImpact on Cycling Master PlanPedestrian Charter/WalkabilityContribution to TDM Strasburg Creek Master Watershed Plan and Implementation Report . In addition to the complete BothNearing Completion Huron Middle Strasburg Cr. Trunk Sanitary Sewer: Environmental Study Report Huron Road construction is (1997), LocationRelation to Built BoundaryComplete Community StatusGeneral Comments: Strasburg Cr. EIS 1 - 41 34 1 - 42 35 high - TBD - high requires new, site - , P TBD - No new industrial providedClose proximity to Bus. ParkUses recently contructed infrastructure Potential mediumNonePotential mediumSeveral propd. nhbd parksTBDTBD, Outside of commtyPotential inside/outsideC & P identified, unbuiltCSome potential rentalExist urban designationCompleteCompleteNew zoning pending CRoZByDevt review remainingExistingNew CC plannedMediumYes, infrastructure red.Potential medium GROWTH AREA SUBPLAN nd parks. Attraction of Talent TimingTimingTiming Goal 4: Foster a Strong EconomyProvision of Industrial/Employment LandsAccessibility to Employment LandsEffective Use of Existing InfrastructureHousing to Support EmploymentBrownfield Redevelopment OpportunitiesImpact on Goal 5: Strengthen CommunitiesActive Park ProvisionLeisure/Community FacilitiesProvision of Social/CulturalSchool AccommodationAffordable Housing ProvisionGoal 6: Manage Change in an Effective and Coordinated MannerOfficial Plan StatusCommunity/Secondary Plan StatusNhbd. Concept Plan/Master Plan StatusZoning StatusStatus of Master Engineering Plans*Impact on Cost of Engineering infrastructureImpact on Cost of Community FacilitiesImpact on Cost of School ProvisionDevelopment Charge ImpactsMaintenance Implications ; Area Specific Priority Analysis , floodplain, wetlands, low . - use pathway and - Designated - . 1 proposed guidelines anticipated proposed 1 2019 on Rd EA reconstruction imarily mixed residential Subject to Clean Water Act and ROP requirements.Str. Cr. Master Watersh. Pl.Strasburg Creek, PSW complex, significant woodlandsslope hazards,private ownershipKnown Nondesignated; known CHLNone proposedRequires ext. of serviceRevised Fall PrAll typesFischer Hallman Design StudyPotential Huron Rd., internalN/AHurcompleteRegion City Huron Rd multiPotential mediumPotential medium Enhance our Valued Natural and Denotes Critical Factor * Impact on Heating/Electric (Feature, Designation, Ownership) Goal 1: Cultural Heritage ResourcesSource Water Protection Area Subwatershed/Drainage Study Natural Heritage ConservationCultural Heritage ConservationEnergy ConservationGoal 2: Create Vibrant Urban PlacesStatus of Urban Design GuidelinesMixture of Land UsesType of Housing ProposedStatus of Streetscape ProjectsContribution to Places to Grow Numerical TargetsGoal 3: Ensure Greater Transportation ChoiceTransit Status Regional StreetsCity StreetsImpact on Cycling Master PlanPedestrian Charter/WalkabilityContribution to TDM and portion of Strasburg Road (South Section) and Huron Road construction is complete. Includes future schools, open space, a Primarily Outside GreenfieldPartial existing Huron South South Strasburg Trunk Sanitary Sewer LocationRelation to Built BoundaryComplete Community StatusGeneral Comments: 1 - 43 36 1 - 44 37 1 - 45 38 many sed SW of proposed s MSTSS close -Highhigh -- d infrastructure in place, most require potential/proposed potential/proposed variety and close2024 - 1 3 Limited. AdjacentPrimarily efficient use ofplanneYes LimitedMedium5 proposed Nhbd Parks, urban greenTBDCC & Library2022Commty, Institutional, gathering spaces plannedCPTBDPotentialUrban DesignationCompleteCompleteSome new zoningPrimary completeMedium MediumMediumYes, infrastructure reqd.Medium GROWTH AREA SUBPLAN Status Master Engineering Plans Parks and recreational facilities will be required. Future District Park propo 5: Strengthen Communities . TimingTimingTiming Goal 4: Foster a Strong EconomyProvision of Industrial/Employment LandsAccessibility to Employment LandsEffective Use of Existing InfrastructureHousing to Support EmploymentBrownfield Redevelopment OpportunitiesImpact on Attraction of TalentGoalActive Park ProvisionLeisure/Community FacilitiesProvision of Social/CulturalSchool AccommodationAffordable Housing ProvisionGoal 6: Manage Change in an Effective and Coordinated MannerOfficial Plan StatusCommunity/Secondary Plan StatusNhbd. Concept Plan/Master Plan Zoning StatusStatus of *Impact on Cost of Engineering infrastructure*Impact on Cost of Community Facilities*Impact on Cost of School Provision*Development Charge Impacts*Maintenance Implications , - *Area Specific Priority Analysis to Core adj. density targets Others required. . to exceed the minimum guidelines anticipated ownership. EIS and buffer floodplain, slope hazards requirements. 2019 Planned Transit Corridor, - min walk principle - Subject to Clean Water Act and ROP Alder/Upper Strasb. StudyContains and Environmental Features, Strasburg Cr., Huron Natural Area, privatereqd as in Alder/Upper Strasburg Watershed PlanDesignated; known nondesignated; known CHLPotentially mediumPotentially mediumRevised Fall Mixed use, higher densityFull range of dwelling typesFH Road Streetscape Plan complete. Planned greenfield FHhigh service plannedFuture FH widening5 major, 2 minor collectorFuture Rd widening Several routes proposed5Potentially medium . Fischer Hallman Rd. widening is required. Denotes Critical Factor * Impact on Heating/Electric (Feature, Designation, Ownership) Goal 1: Enhance our Valued Natural and Cultural Heritage ResourcesSource Water Protection Area Subwatershed/Drainage Study Natural Heritage ConservationCultural Heritage ConservationEnergy ConservationGoal 2: Create Vibrant Urban PlacesStatus of Urban Design GuidelinesMixture of Land UsesType of Housing ProposedStatus of Streetscape ProjectsContribution to Places to Grow Numerical TargetsGoal 3: Ensure Greater Transportation ChoiceTransit Status Regional StreetsCity StreetsImpact on Cycling Master PlanPedestrian Charter/WalkabilityContribution to TDM 2025 2 - Trunk Sewer is required for development of the north portion of the area 20262026 2024 -- 2020- 2020 Sanitary 20252024 2022 Proposed Timing (Region) OutsideGreenfieldPrimarily new - The Secondary Plan directs development to further utilize sustainability techniques. osenberg R Plains) - Extension of the Middle Strasburg Timing may be advanced via Credit Refund Agreement. Road Watermain (Fischer Hallman 2 Middle Strasburg Sanitary Trunk Sewer *Major Remaining InitiativesFischer Hallman (BleamsStrasburg Creek Flood Control Structure Huron Trussler)Amand DriveLocationRelation to Built BoundaryComplete Community StatusGeneral Comments: Huron/Fischer Hallman Road. 1 - 46 39 1 - 47 40 1 - 48 41 large housing area - medium - Medium - No new industrial providedClose proximityExist. New water (Region)Med.Likely noneLowExisting N/AEx. temp. Commty CentreN/AEx temp. CC, private spaceExistingN/ALow. Affordable ownership+Existing urban.Complete. Amendment reqd for remain. Phase 3A lands.Reqd for remaining lands.New zoning pending CRoZByBorden Sewer Cap. StudyLow.Estimated low.CNow primarily revenueMedium GROWTH AREA SUBPLAN Lands the community which is a high priority. Existing Infrastructure TimingTimingTiming Goal 4: Foster a Strong EconomyProvision of Industrial/Employment LandsAccessibility to Employment Effective Use of Housing to Support EmploymentBrownfield Redevelopment OpportunitiesImpact on Attraction of TalentGoal 5: Strengthen CommunitiesActive Park ProvisionLeisure/Community FacilitiesProvision of Social/CulturalSchool AccommodationAffordable Housing ProvisionGoal 6: Manage Change in an Effective and Coordinated MannerOfficial Plan StatusCommunity/Secondary Plan StatusNhbd. Concept Plan/Master Plan StatusZoning StatusStatus of Master Engineering PlansImpact on Cost of Engineering infrastructureImpact on Cost of Community FacilitiesImpact on Cost of School ProvisionDevelopment Charge ImpactsMaintenance Implications , Area Specific Priority Analysis Remaining parcels would help complete low - k Sewer. . Ixpress 2 existing guidelines anticipated density target 4 proposed Upper Shoemaker Cr. 2019 , Subject to Clean Water Act and ROP requirements.Laurentian W. Master Drainage PlanstudyWetlands, woodlands, ESPAfloodplain, slope hazards,Laurentian W. Community Plan Environmental Review, some public ownership and some privatedesignatedNone proposedExist service, medRevised Fall Community includes exist.Mix of residential typesNew developmentExist. FH Exist.Exist., newRegion City MediumLow Protection Area Create Vibrant Urban Places Denotes Critical Factor * Impact on Heating/Electric (Feature, Designation, Ownership) Goal 1: Enhance our Valued Natural and Cultural Heritage ResourcesSource Water Subwatershed/Drainage Study Natural Heritage ConservationCultural Heritage ConservationEnergy ConservationGoal 2:Status of Urban Design GuidelinesMixture of Land UsesType of Housing ProposedStatus of Streetscape ProjectsContribution to Places to Grow Numerical TargetsGoal 3: Ensure Greater Transportation ChoiceTransit Status Regional StreetsCity StreetsImpact on Cycling Master PlanPedestrian Charter/WalkabilityContribution to TDM 3a - BothMostly complete Status Portion of development includes temporary pumping station to be removed following extension of Middle Strasburg Sanitary Trun Laurentian West Ph 1 LocationRelation to Built BoundaryComplete Community General Comments: 1 - 49 42 1 - 50 43 with the proposed urban designations potential medium 1 proposed site Nhbd park None proposedAdj. to expresswayPumping Stn requiredPotential mediumNoneLow6TBDNoneUnknownPTBDLow. Aff. home ownership +Existing CompleteCompleteNew zoning pending CRoZByServicing scheme, SWMYes, cost TBDTBDPotential, TBDYes, infrastructure reqdTBD GROWTH AREA SUBPLAN TimingTimingTiming . Requires construction of sanitary servicing infrastructure in accordance Impact on Cost of Engineering infrastructure Goal 4: Foster a Strong EconomyProvision of Industrial/Employment LandsAccessibility to Employment Lands*Effective Use of Existing InfrastructureHousing to Support EmploymentBrownfield Redevelopment OpportunitiesImpact on Attraction of TalentGoal 5: Strengthen CommunitiesActive Park ProvisionLeisure/Community FacilitiesProvision of Social/CulturalSchool AccommodationAffordable Housing ProvisionGoal 6: Manage Change in an Effective and Coordinated MannerOfficial Plan StatusCommunity/Secondary Plan StatusNhbd. Concept Plan/Master Plan StatusZoning StatusStatus of Master Engineering Plans*Impact on Cost of Community FacilitiesImpact on Cost of School Provision*Development Charge ImpactsMaintenance Implications Official Plan Area Specific Priority Analysis oodlands, upgrades TBD . 2 proposed guidelines anticipated long dist to destinations 2019 - Subject to Clean Water Act and ROP requirements.Alder/Upper Stras. Cr. StudySignificant wunevaluated wetlands, EIS reqd., Laurentian W. Community Plan Environmental Review, private ownershipUnder reviewTBDServicing nearbyRevised Fall Primarily residential proposedMixed dwelling typeNew developmentNone exist., potential TBDExisting Requires newRegion LowLow Charter/Walkability Streetscape Projects Denotes Critical Factor * Impact on Heating/Electric (Feature, Designation, Ownership) Goal 1: Enhance our Valued Natural and Cultural Heritage ResourcesSource Water Protection Area Subwatershed/Drainage Study Natural Heritage ConservationCultural Heritage ConservationEnergy ConservationGoal 2: Create Vibrant Urban PlacesStatus of Urban Design GuidelinesMixture of Land Uses Type of Housing ProposedStatus of Contribution to Places to Grow Numerical TargetsGoal 3: Ensure Greater Transportation ChoiceTransit Status Regional StreetsCity StreetsImpact on Cycling Master PlanPedestrian Contribution to TDM 2024) - 2 2025 2020 Proposed Timing (Region 2020 Outside3A new, partial existing main parcel of land received land use and subdivision approval by the OMB in 2015. These lands have urban land uses in the Ci y) Hw - The Laurentian West Ph 3B Trussler Area Sewage Facility - Remaining Initiatives Charges Study/Capital Forecast via Credit Refund Agreement. Indicates timing of infrastructure construction earlier than Development 2 Major OttawaBorden Greenway Trunk Trussler Road (BleamsLocationRelation to Built BoundaryComplete Community StatusGeneral Comments:approved EA. Two new parcels have been included (#145 and 146). 1 - 51 44 1 - 52 S HU B 1 - 53 Attachment to Planning & Strategic Initiatives Committee Agenda September 30, 2019 RE: DSD-19-206 Appendix B 1 - 54 ! Bvhvtu!7-!312: Ujn!Epofhboj! Tfojps!Qmboofs!)Qpmjdz*! ETE!.!Qmboojoh!Ejwjtjpo! Ljudifofs!Djuz!Ibmm-!7ui!Gmpps! 311!Ljoh!Tusffu!Xftu-!Q/P/!Cpy!2229! Ljudifofs!PO!O3H!5H8! ! Efbs!Ns/!Epofhboj;! ! SF;!!ESBGU!DJUZ!PG!LJUDIFOFS!HSPXUI!NBOBHFNFOU!QMBO!)LHNQ*!3128.312:,!0!DFOUSF! JDF!MQ0!TUBUJPO!QBSL!EFWFMPQNFOU!0!718.752!LJOH!TUSFFU!XFTU-!LJUDIFOFS! !PVS!GJMF!26313I! ! Xf!bsf!xsjujoh!po!cfibmg!pg!pvs!dmjfou-!Dfousf!Jdf!MQ-!pxofst!pg!718.752!Ljoh!Tusffu!Xftu-!Ljudifofs/!!Xf! ibwf!sfwjfxfe!uif!Esbgu!Ljudifofs!Hspxui!Nbobhfnfou!Qmbo!)LHNQ*!sfmbujwf!up!uiftf!mboet!boe!dpogjsn! pvs!tvqqpsu!pg!uif!esbgu!sfqpsu/!!Tqfdjgjdbmmz!xf!bsf!xsjujoh!jo!tvqqpsu!uif!Qsjpsjuz!B!tubuvt!uibu!ibt!cffo! jefoujgjfe!gps!uiftf!mboet/!! ! Ju!jt!pvs!voefstuboejoh!uibu!uif!gjobm!LHNQ!xjmm!cf!dpotjefsfe!cz!Dpnnjuuff!pg!Dpvodjm!po!Npoebz-! Tfqufncfs!41ui-!312:/!!Ljoemz!lffq!vt!jogpsnfe!pg!uijt!qspdftt!boe!djsdvmbuf!uif!gjobm!LHNQ!podf! bwbjmbcmf/!! ! Zpvst!usvmz-! ! NICD ! !!!!!!! Dbspm!Xjfcf-!CFT!!!!!!Boesfb!Tjodmbjs-!NVET-!NDJQ-!SQQ! Qbsuofs!!!!!!!!Bttpdjbuf! ! Dd!Bsu!wbo!Nbsfo-!WboNbs!Dpotusvdupst!PO!Jod/! !Nbvsjdjp!Njsboeb-!WboNbs!Dpotusvdupst!PO!Jod/!! !Efmmb!Sptt-!Djuz!pg!Ljudifofs! Kvmjbof!wpo!Xftufsipmu-!Djuz!pg!Ljudifofs!!! !! 1 - 55 1 - 56 1 - 57 1 - 58 1 - 59 1 - 60 1 - 61 1 - 62 August 9, 2019 Tim Donegani Senior Planner | City of Kitchener Via email: tim.donegani@kitchener.ca Re: Draft Kitchener Growth Management Plan Fall 2019-Fall 2021 Dear Mr. Donegani, Grand River Conservation Authority (GRCA) staff have now had a chance to review the draft Kitchener Growth Management Plan (KGMP) Fall 2019-Fall 2021, prepared by the City of Kitchener, dated July 17, 2019. Further to ourpreliminary comments provided by email on August 2, 2019, based on our reviewof the KGMP we have the following GRCA Property comments: 1.We noticed that a Proposed District Park is shown on GRCA-owned lands in the Grand River South area (maps on page 20 and page 43). We recommend removing this from the map at this time, as no decisions have been made regarding these lands. 2.Please notethat as per GRCA motion CW136-10, the Board has not made a decision regarding the southern portion of the lands east of Woolner Trail for the Grand River South area. As such, please remove those lands from the high priority designation and remove the se immediately south of the Woolner Heritage Farm to the Grand River be conserved for Wetrust this information is of assistance. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at 519-621-2763 ext. 2319 or thughes@grandriver.ca. Sincerely, Trisha Hughes Resource Planner Grand River Conservation Authority c.c.Beth Brown, GRCA (via email) 1 - 63 1 - 64 Mr. Tim Donegani Senior Planner City of Kitchener 200 King Street West Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7 August 6, 2019 RE: comments to DRAFT 2019-2021 Kitchener Growth Management Plan Dear Mr. Donegani, Pearl Valley Development Corporation (Pearl Valley) would like to comment Growth Management Plan as proposed and published online in July, 2019. As the Owner of the largest vacant parcel in Hidden Valley, we are working closely with City of Kitchener staff to create a remarkable new neighbourhood. Having owned and worked to develop this parcel for fifteen years, we have now started its development process. A start within the next 2 years is achievable and anticipated an in line with actions taken by the City itself to support this timeline. As per the Draft KPGM, our lands are proposed to have a Priority C designation. We strongly feel that it should be at least a Priority B area for the numerous reasons outlined below. 1.First and foremost, only approval of the Hidden Valley Land Use Masterplan and initiation of its Secondary Plan, and initiatives, as well as A priority B designation will ensure the City assigns the necessary resources for the completion of required studies, the Secondary Plan preparation and coordination of the development process between all parties in a timely way. 2.Secondly, Strategy, its vision and supporting goals in an effective manner that contributes to not only achieving the required density and intensification targets but it does this within an existing built- up area that has a significant number of assets, a desirable location and context to deliver sought- after housing choice and amenities. This area can contribute to our healthy community like few other parcels available in Kitchener today. 3. infrastructure construction within its right-of-way is of utmost importance to effectively manage capital/staff resources without future doubling of efforts and increases in costs. The 2019-2021 timeframe is critical for this as phase 1 of RRE will be constructed during this period. Furthermore, my former conversations with City staff and official comments to a previous KGMP priority designation to revisit the timing for Hidden Valley infrastructure and planning processes once the River Road EA was completed. It is worth 1 - 65 noting that at that point, part of our parcel (with a draft approved plan) was already given the highest priority. 4.Contribution to goals as per Area Subplan: a) Goal 1 given the importance of the existing natural feature within the area, and its significant size (larger than many other within or near proposed KGMP developments), Hidden Valley contributes fully to achieving this goal. b) Goal 2 with its marvelous context, features and topography, this area can significantly contribute to the creation of vibrant urban places. As it i key city corridor, the new development with its design considerations will enhance the area greatly. Moreover, as stated in the Hidden Valley LUMP process, it can provide for the missing typology of buildings and spaces, greatly sought after in Kitchener. For all these reasons, this area, like no other, can create unique vibrant urban places. Its contribution to this goal should be significantly increased. c) Goal 3 with the imminent construction of River Road Extension (designed for all types of transportation modes), the planned Phase 2 of the ION and wide range of mixed uses proposed within this area as well as potential on- and off-road connections (as envisioned for example in walkability and TDM. Because of its proximity to the light rail transit and urban corridor, and ability to expand existing bus network, this area has the most versatile transportation network of all greenfield sites and value assigned to it. d) Goal 4 . In a 8 interchanges, and a variety of housing choices, this area can foster a strong economy. e) Goal 5 as Hidden Valley itself currently has few amenities and also adjoins a large, older neighbourhood, the considerable potential for new community uses and social interaction as well as affordable housing provision, can significantly strengthen its surrounding community. Building new, attractive facilities and spaces within and around marvelous open areas, can not only enhance but leave a lasting positive impact on the entire area, exceeding the average scale of contribution currently assigned to it. f) Goal 6 for all of the above reasons, those identified in points 1-3 and described under goals 1-5, prioritizing the development of Hidden Valley will be an example of utmost effective and coordinated change management. Furthermore, n should be taken into account. Future residents and employees of this area will reap direct benefits from its development Hidden Valley will be the most versatile, well-linked and urban greenfield site available. Travelling to and from it, having the most diverse amenities, mixed-uses and densities right within and next to it, will minimize daily expenditures, but also social and environmental impacts. Hidden Valley will be a community healthier than most currently planned. Therefore, the level of contribution to goal 6 should be increased as well. In summary, Pearl Valley would like the City of Kitchener to re-evaluate the proposed designation and give our lands a B priority in the Kitchener Growth Management Plan 2019-2021+. In relation to other available development sites and achieving the goals of the KGMS and provincial policies, Hidden Valley lands ought to be prioritized for development within the horizon of this KGMP. land use planning and ensure timely execution of its Secondary Plan. We would be pleased to discuss the above comments in more detail or answer any questions you may have. Please do not hesitate to contact me to further discuss the above. 1 - 66 Sincerely, Peter Benninger Owner & President CC: 1.Members of Kitchener Council 2.Alain Pinard, Director of Planning, City of Kitchener 3.Brandon Sloan, Manager, Long Range & Policy Planning, City of Kitchener 1 - 67 ! ! LJUDIFOFS! XPPECSJEHF! MPOEPO! LJOHTUPO! CBSSJF! CVSMJOHUPO! Bvhvtu!7-!312:! ! Ujn!Epofhboj! Tfojps!Qmboofs!)Qpmjdz*! ETE!.!Qmboojoh!Ejwjtjpo! Ljudifofs!Djuz!Ibmm-!7ui!Gmpps! 311!Ljoh!Tusffu!Xftu-!Q/P/!Cpy!2229! Ljudifofs!PO!O3H!5H8! ! Efbs!Ns/!Epofhboj;! ! SF;!!ESBGU!DJUZ!PG!LJUDIFOFS!HSPXUI!NBOBHFNFOU!QMBO!)LHNQ*!3128.312:,!0!IJEEFO! WBMMFZ!LJUDIFOFS!MUE/!)QFUFS!LSVTF*!0!IJEEFO!WBMMFZ!SPBE-!LJUDIFOFS! !PVS!GJMF!:948!D! ! Xf!bsf!xsjujoh!po!cfibmg!pg!pvs!dmjfou-!Ijeefo!Wbmmfz!Ljudifofs!Mue/!)Qfufs!Lsvtf*-!xip!pxo!mboe!po!uif! tpvui!tjef!pg!Ijeefo!Wbmmfz!Spbe/!!!Uijt!qspqfsuz!nfbtvsft!bqqspyjnbufmz!3/15!ifdubsft!jo!bsfb!boe!jt! tjuvbufe!cfuxffo!uif!Ijeefo!Wbmmfz!Ftubuft!tvcejwjtjpo!boe!uif!Csjemf!Qbui!tvcejwjtjpo/!Ju!jt!jefoujgjfe!bt! Qbsdfm!226!po!qbhf!33!pg!uif!Esbgu!Ljudifofs!Hspxui!Nbobhfnfou!Qmbo!)LHNQ*/!!Uif!tvckfdu!mboet!bsf! jefoujgjfe!bt!ibwjoh!Qsjpsjuz!C!tubuvt/!!! ! Xf!bsf!xsjujoh!jo!tvqqpsu!uif!Qsjpsjuz!C!tubuvt!boe!opuf!uibu!uif!tvckfdu!mboet!ibwf!qsfwjpvtmz!cffo! jefoujgjfe!gps!gvuvsf!efwfmpqnfou!boe!bddpvoufe!gps!jo!uif!eftjho!sfrvjsfnfout!pg!uif!tbojubsz!qvnqjoh! tubujpo!mpdbufe!po!Sjwfs!Cjsdi!Spbe!up!uif!tpvui/!!!Uif!tvckfdu!mboet!bmtp!ibwf!gspoubhf!po!b!nvojdjqbm! tusffu!boe!xjmm!cf!tvjubcmf!gps!sftjefoujbm!efwfmpqnfou!bt!fowjtjpofe!jo!uif!Esbgu!Ijeefo!Wbmmfz!Tfdpoebsz! Qmbo/!!! Ju!jt!pvs!voefstuboejoh!uibu!uif!gjobm!LHNQ!xjmm!cf!dpotjefsfe!cz!Dpnnjuuff!pg!Dpvodjm!po!Npoebz-! Tfqufncfs!41ui-!312:/!!Ljoemz!lffq!vt!jogpsnfe!pg!uijt!qspdftt!boe!djsdvmbuf!uif!gjobm!LHNQ!podf! bwbjmbcmf/!! Zpvst!usvmz-! NICD! ! !!!!!!! Dbspm!Xjfcf-!CFT!!!!!!! Qbsuofs!! !!!!!!!! Dd!Qfufs!Lsvtf-!Svtt!Mbxtpo-!Ijeefo!Wbmmfz!Ljudifofs!Mue/!!! ! 311.651!CJOHFNBOT!DFOUSF!ESJWF!0!LJUDIFOFS!0!POUBSJP!0!O3C!4Y:!0!U!62:!687!4761!0!G!62:!687!1232!0!XXX/NICDQMBO/DPN 1 - 68 1 - 69 1 - 70 1 - 71 1 - 72 1 - 73 1 - 74 1 - 75 1 - 76 1 - 77 1 - 78 1 - 79 1 - 80 1 - 81 1 - 82 1 - 83 1 - 84 1 - 85 1 - 86 1 - 87 August 7, 2019File No: 19107 City of Kitchener th Planning Division, 6Floor 200 King Street West Kitchener, Ontario N2G 4G7 Attention:Mr. Tim Donegani Senior Planner Dear Mr. Donegani: Re:Growth Management Plan 2019-2021+ Draft Plan of Subdivision 30T-08206 South EstatesLimited KGMP Plan ID #120 On behalf of our client, South Estates Limited,please accept the following commentary regarding the final draft of the Growth Management Plan 2019-2021+ (June 2019) as it relates to Draft Plan of Subdivision 30T-08206. The property is located on the south side of Bleams Road and is part of the Rosenburg Secondary Plan. The property is subject to Draft Plan of Subdivision 30T-08206, which allows for a maximum of 433 residential dwelling units along with a future school and park block. The property is currently designated as Low Density Residential One and Two, Neighbourhood Park, and Neighbourhood Institutional in the Rosenberg Secondary Plan, and zoned for residential, institutional and park purposes. The property is identified as ID#120 as part of the Growth Management Plan 2019-2021+and is currently listedasstatus. According to the Growth Management Plan 2019-2021+, actively worked on within the coming 2- given the highest priorities with respect to development applications and initiatives. 1 - 88 We respectfully request that consideration be given to changing the future development status of the subject property considered as justification for this request. The Growth Management Plan 2019-2021+ identifies criteria that areused to determine the priority of growth and development. The following provides a summary of thesecriteria as well as brief commentary as to how we believe each consideration has been addressed with respect to the subject property and future development. Achievement of Provincial, Regional and City Growth Plan and Official Plan Objectives: The existing planning policy and regulatory framework indicatesthat the property is intended to be developed as a residential community. The approval of the Rosenburg Secondary Plan and associated zoning regulations by the Ontario Municipal Board in July 2012 indicates that the proposed development was consistent with the Provincial, Regional and City policy and regulatory framework in effect at the time of approval. Annual Monitoring Report:The Kitchener Growth Management Strategy 2018 Annual Monitoring Report (DSD-18-077) noted that the number of overall new dwellings created in 2017 had decreased from 2016 with an overall decrease in the supply of dwelling units in both the built-up and designed greenfield area from June 2017 to June 2018. The 2019 Annual Monitoring Report notes that the City issued its highest number of building permits for multiple dwellings within the designated greenfield area since 2010. The identification statuswould increase the short to medium term supply of dwelling units and provide opportunities for low density residential development that will balance the recent influx of multiple residential dwellings within the greenfield area. Balanced Growth (Intensification and Greenfield):The property is located within the Roseburg Community and is considered greenfield development. The intent of the Growth Management Plan 2019-2021+ is to balance growth between intensification/redevelopment in existing built-up areas, and greenfield development. It is intensification/redevelopment within the existing built-up area, and that the few properties ng constructed. status will broaden the opportunities for growth and development within the greenfield area and balance it with lated within the existing build-up area. Timing of Municipal Infrastructure:The development oftheDraft Plan of Subdivision requires the extension of the Middle Strasburg Sanitary Trunk Sewer, which is scheduled 1 - 89 in the City of Kitchener 2019Capital Budget and 10-Year Forecast for 2022-2023. However, as noted on Page 36 of the Growth Management Plan 2019-2021+, the timing of the sanitary truck sewer may be advanced prior to 2022-2023.The Middle Strasburg Sanitary Sewer is now 100% designed and shovel ready for the 2020 construction season. and expansion project which includesthe Bleams and Fischer Hallman Road intersection improvement works which are also scheduled for 2020. These two projects represent over 25million dollars in municipal upgrades planned for in 2020. This investment in Municipal Resources and Agency Input:Municipal and agency departments would have been closely involved with the approval of the Rosenburg Secondary Plan in 2012and the subsequent approval of Draft Plan of Subdivision 20T-08206. Additional municipal and agency input would be required to facilitate the future registration and development of the subject property. Capital Budget/Forecast:The required extension of the Middle Strasburg Sanitary Trunk Sewer has been identified asaDevelopment Credit (DC) item for 2022-2023. RBJ SchlegelPark at the corner of Huron Road and Fisher Hallman Road is currently under construction, and the City of Kitchener 2019 Capital Budget and 10-Year Forecast for 2022-2023 identifies further park additions and enhancements between 2019 and 2023 (community centre, indoor pool and outdoor fields). Finally, the Region of Waterloo 2019 Operating Budget and Capital Program 2019-2028 identifies various road and intersection improvements for Fisher Hallman Road and Bleams Road between 2019 and 2022. It is our opinion that the City of Kitchener and Region of Waterloo 2019 capital budget/forecast provides for imminent infrastructure, roads and community improvements that would In summary, it is our opinion that the future development of the property and its identification objectives. The priority development of the property will provide for an additional supply of dwelling units and broaden the opportunities for low density growth and development within the greenfield area that will balance planned intensification and redevelopment within the existing built-up area. The future development of the property will be serviced by municipal infrastructure, roads and community services contemplated for by both the City and Region. TheGrowth Management Plan 2019-2021+identifies the subject property to be actively worked on with high priority over the next two years,astatus would allow South Estates to proceed with development and construction in the immediate to near future. 1 - 90 I trust the above-noted commentary provides adequate commentary and justification for our Please donot hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or wish to discuss further. Yours truly, GSP Group Sarah Code, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner 1 - 91 1 - 92 2658!Cmpps!Tusffu!Xftu! Upspoup-!Poubsjp!N7Q!2B6! !)527*!:34.7741! !xxx/thmqmboojoh/db jogpAthmqmboojoh/db! Bvhvtu!8-!312:!Pvs!gjmf;!NH/LJ Ujn!Epofhboj! Qmboojoh!Ejwjtjpo! Djuz!pg!Ljudifofs! 311!Ljoh!Tusffu!Xftu! Ljudifofs-!PO!!O3H!5H8! Efbs!Ns/!Epofhboj;! Sf;!Esbgu!Ljudifofs!Hspxui!Nbobhfnfou!Qmbo!)LHNQ*!Gbmm!312:!Ä!Gbmm!3132! !Ljudifofs!Hsffo!Efwfmpqnfout!Jod/!Ä!LHNQ!Qbsdfm!JE!244!'!245! Xf!bsf!xsjujoh!po!cfibmg!pg!Ljudifofs!Hsffo!Efwfmpqnfout!Jod/!xjui!sftqfdu!up!qspqfsujft! jefoujgjfe!bt!Qbsdfm!$244!'!245!jo!uif!Esbgu!Ljudifofs!Hspxui!Nbobhfnfofu!Qmbo!)LHNQ*! Gbmm!312:!Ä!Gbmm!3132/!!Uiftf!mboet!bsf!bmtp!mpdbufe!xjuijo!uif!Sptfocfsh!Tfdpoebsz!Qmbo!Bsfb! pg!Ljudifofs/!! ! Xf!bsf!qmfbtfe!up!tff!uibu!uif!bcpwf!opufe!qspqfsujft!ibwf!cffo!jefoujgjfe!bt!Qsjpsjuz!C!mboet-! xjui!uif!joufou!pg!uif!LHNQ!cfjoh!uibu!mboet!xjui!uijt!qsjpsjuz!mfwfm!Æ cf!bdujwfmz!xpslfe!po!xjui! ijhi!qsjpsjuz!jo!uif!dpnjoh!3.zfbs!ujnfgsbnf Ç/!!Hjwfo!uibu!efwfmpqnfou!bqqmjdbujpot!ibwf!cffo! tvcnjuufe!gps!uiftf!mboet!boe!bsf!dvssfoumz!voefs!sfwjfx-!xf!fyqfdu!uibu!uiftf!mboet!tipvme!cf! npwfe!up!b!Qsjpsjuz!B!eftjhobujpo!jo!uif!ofyu!sfqpsu!)3132!Ä!3134,*/ Qmfbtf!opuf!uibu!pxofsÉt!obnf!gps!cpui!qbsdfm!$244!'!245!tipvme!cf!dibohfe!up!Æ Ljudifofs! Hsffo!Efwfmpqnfout!Jod/Ç/! ! Pwfsbmm-!xf!bsf!tvqqpsujwf!pg!uif!Esbgu!LHNQ!Gbmm!312:!Ä!Gbmm!3132/!!Uibol!zpv!gps!uif! pqqpsuvojuz!up!dpnnfou/!!Qmfbtf!ep!opu!iftjubuf!up!dpoubdu!vt!jg!zpv!ibwf!boz!dpnnfout!ps! rvftujpot/! ! Zpvst!wfsz!usvmz-! THM!QMBOOJOH!'!EFTJHO!JOD/! ! ! ! Ebwje!Sjmfz-!SQQ-!NDJQ! Qsjodjqbm! ! Dd;!Csbe!Usvttmfs-!Ljudifofs!Hsffo!Efwfmpqnfout!Jod/! 1 - 93 1 - 94 1 - 95 379 Queen Street South Kitchener, ON N2G 1W8 Tel. 519.745.3249 www.polocorpinc.com August 7, 2019 Planning Department City of Kitchener 200 King Street West Kitchener, ONN2G 4G7 Via E-mail Attention: Tim Donegani(Senior Planner) Reference:KGMP 2019-2021+ 2219and 2159Ottawa Street Kitchener, ON N2E 0C8 Dear Mr. Donegani, On behalf of Kitchener Trussler Holdings Inc. (“KTHI”), Polocorp Inc.would like to formally provide comments on the draft Kitchener Growth Management Plan 2019-2021+ (KGMP). KTHI is the owner of the lands municipally addressed as 2219 and 2159 Ottawa Street (subject lands) and is in the process ofpreparing an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-Law Amendment, and Draft Plan of Subdivision application to facilitate the residential development of the lands. Subject Lands The landsmunicipally addressed as 2219 Ottawa Street consists of approximately 8.94 hectares (22.08 acres). The lands are bordered by Ottawa Street to the north, Trussler Road to the west, the Taylor Lands to the south, and the Mannheim Water Treatment Plant to the east.Thesingle- detachedresidential propertyaddressed as 2159 Ottawa Street (approximately 0.82 hectares) was recently acquired by KTHI,which has been incorporated into the proposed Draft Plan. The City-owned lands (old Ottawa Street alignment) consists of approximately 0.95 hectares (2.3 acres) located between the lands owned by KTHI.KTHI is in the process of acquiring this parcel from the City of Kitchener to be integrated into the Draft Plan.The Region of Waterloo is currently undertaking a removal of the existing pipewithin this parcel in advance of the acquisition of the lands by KTHI. Consultation On August 22, 2017, a Pre-Submission Consultation was held with City staff, Regional staff, Mr. Moxey (previous owner of 2219 Ottawa Street), Mr. Taylor, and ourselves to discuss the development proposal for808 Trussler Road and the subject lands. Since the Pre-Submission 1 - 96 Consultation, KTHI has acquired the property located at 2159 Ottawa Street and has begun the process of acquiring the old Ottawa Street alignment from the City. In addition to the acquisitions, the following modifications to the Draft Plan have been undertaken to reflect meetings with the City/Region: Access to the dwelling located on the 2219 Ottawa Street lands has been revised to reflect City of Kitchener heritage planning staff comments; Visual access to the existing dwelling from Trussler Road has been provided through the relocation of the stormwater management pond; The location and size of the parkland blocks have been revised to reflect City of Kitchener park staff comments; and The vehicular accesses to the proposed subdivision have been relocated to Ottawa Street to reflect grading challenges within the site. The revised Draft Plan illustrates the progress that KTHI has made towards the development of the lands. Proposed Land Use The subject lands are includedwithin the urban boundaryof the Region, as identified within Map 3A of the Region of Waterloo Official Plan. Within the City’s Official Plan, the subject lands are identified as Residential,Natural Heritage, and Mixed-Use. The conceptual Draft Plan of Subdivision identifies municipal roads with two connections to Ottawa Street. Within the subdivision, a variety of residential dwellings types have been identified, including single- detached, townhouse dwellings, and multiple block units. A preliminary analysis of the lands undertaken by Stantec has determined that servicing capacity is available to service the development. Rationale for Inclusion At this time, we are preparing the formal applications to the City, and would request that the 2019- 2021+ KGMP reflect the status of the development. The draft KGMP identifiesthe subject lands as a ‘Priority B’. We would request that the KGMP be updated to designate the lands as ‘Priority A’, for the following reasons: The subject lands are situated within the Built Up Area for the City of Kitchener; The subject lands are developable with servicing available along both Ottawa Street and Trussler Road; The subject lands will be serviced by a pumping station that is under construction on the Activa Lands. The required infrastructure to service the lands will be availablewithin the next year; and The subjectlands will be included in a formal Official PlanAmendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, and Draft Plan of Subdivision application in winter 2019/2020. At the current time, there are several planning, engineering, and landuse justification/rationale for the inclusion of the subject lands within the 2019-2021+ KGMP. These rationale for inclusion are: Ottawa Street hasbeenreconstructed which will provide servicing, vehicular, and active transportation connections tothe subject lands; New watermainshave beenincluded within the reconstruction of Ottawa Street which can service the subject lands; 1 - 97 In 2018, the new pumping station and Activa subdivision at Ottawa Street and Trussler Roadbegan grading andconstruction and the proponentshave beencoordinatingto ensure that sufficient capacity and depths have been included for the pumping of the subject lands; and The proponentswould like to coordinate with the Laurentian West Plan, currently under review by the City and Region. We appreciate the opportunity to provide comments and request that any further correspondence with stakeholders include ourselves. Regards, Paul Puopolo, RPP, MCIP Amanda Stellings, Planner CC: Brian Bateman, City of Kitchener Joe Valela, Tercot Communities David Cogliano, Tercot Communities Filipe Dias, Tercot Communities 1 - 98 APPENDIX A: SUBJECT LANDS 1 - 99 379 Queen Street South Kitchener, ON N2G 1W8 Tel. 519.745.3249 www.polocorpinc.com August 7, 2019 Planning Department City of Kitchener 200 King Street West Kitchener, ONN2G 4G7 Via E-mail Attention: Tim Donegani(Senior Planner) Reference:KGMP 2019-2021+ 808 Trussler Road Kitchener, ON N2E 0C8 Dear Mr. Donegani, On behalf of Dr. Steven Taylor,Polocorp Inc.would like to formally provide comments on the draft Kitchener Growth Management Plan 2019-2021+ (KGMP). Dr. Tayloris the owner of the lands municipally addressed as 808 Trussler Road(subject lands) and is in the process ofpreparing an Official Plan AmendmentandZoning By-Law Amendmentapplication to facilitate the residential development of the lands. Subject Lands The subject lands are municipally addressed as 808 Trussler Road andconsistof approximately 2.69hectares (6.65acres). The lands are bordered by 2219 Ottawa Street to the north, Trussler Road to the west, Bleams Roadto the south, and the Mannheim Water Treatment Plantto the east.The proposed development is intended to be coordinated with the 2219 and 2159 Ottawa Street lands, which will provide servicing and road connections to the subject lands. Consultation On August 22, 2017, a Pre-Submission Consultation was held with City staff, Regional staff, Mr. Moxey (previous owner of 2219 Ottawa Street), Mr. Taylor,and ourselves to discuss the development proposal for 2219 Ottawa Street and the subject lands. Since the Pre-Submission Consultation, ongoing discussions with Regional and City staff have been undertakento discuss the development of the subject lands, as well as thedesign of the2219 and 2159 Ottawa Street lands. A Draft Plan has now been prepared, which will be provided as part of the formal applications for the lands in winter 2019/2020. The revised Draft Plan illustrates the progress that Mr. Taylor has made towards the development of the lands. 1 - 100 Proposed Land Use The subject lands are included within the urban boundary of the Region, as identified within Map 3A of the Region of Waterloo Official Plan. Within the City’s Official Plan, the subject lands are identified as Residential. The conceptual Draft Plan identifies municipal roads on the 2219 Ottawa Street lands with two connections to Ottawa Street. Within the Taylor lands, a multiple block has been shown which would be developed as townhouses and/or stacked townhouses as part ofa future Site Plan/Plan of Condominium application.A preliminary analysis of the lands undertaken by Stantec has determined that servicing capacity is available to service the development. Rationale for Inclusion At this time, we are preparing the formal applications to the City, and would request that the KGMP reflect the status of the development. The draft KGMP 2019-2021+ identifiesthe subject lands as a ‘Priority B’. We would request that the KGMP be updated to designate the lands as ‘Priority A’, for the following reasons: The subject lands are situated within the Built Up Area for the City of Kitchener; The subject lands are developable with servicing along Ottawa Street and Trussler Road; The subject lands will be serviced by a pumping station that is under construction on the Activa Lands. The required infrastructure to service the lands will be availablewithin the next year; and The subjectlands will be included in a formal Official Plan AmendmentandZoning By-law Amendmentapplication in winter 2019/2020. At the current time, there are several planning, engineering, and land use justification/rationale for the inclusion of the subject lands within the KGMP. These rationale for inclusion are: Ottawa Street has been reconstructed which will provide servicing, vehicular, and active transportation connections to the subject lands; New watermains have been included within the reconstruction of Ottawa Street which can service the subject lands; In 2018, the new pumping station and Activa subdivision at Ottawa Street and Trussler Road began grading and construction and the proponents have been coordinating to ensure that sufficient capacity and depths have been included for the pumping of the subject lands; and The proponents would like to coordinate with the Laurentian West Plan, currently under review by the City and Region. We appreciate the opportunity to provide comments and request that any further correspondence with stakeholders include ourselves. Regards, Paul Puopolo, RPP, MCIP Amanda Stellings, Planner CC: Brian Bateman, City of Kitchener Dr. Steven Taylor 1 - 101 APPENDIX A: SUBJECT LANDS 1 - 102