Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCommunity Svcs - 2000-05-01CSC\2000-05-01 COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES MAY 17 2000 CITY OF KITCHENER The Community Services Committee met this date, chaired by Councillor G. Lorentz, commencing at 1:55 p.m., with the following members present: Councillors T. Galloway, Jake Smola, John Smola, B. Vrbanovic, C. Weylie and J. Ziegler. Mayor C. Zehr and Councillor M. Yantzi were in attendance for part of the meeting. Officials Present: Ms. P. Houston, Ms. J. Billett and Messrs. F. Pizzuto, R. Wyatt, D. Daly, R. Weber, K. Nihls, G. Nixon, G. Melanson and J. Gazzola. 1. APPOINTMENTS - COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Mr. F. Pizzuto advised that in accordance with the restructuring plan for the Community Services Department, 2 of the 3 Director positions have now been filled. In this regard, Mr. Pizzuto announced the appointment of Mr. Dan Daly as the Director of Parks and Environmental Services and Mr. Keith Baulk as the Director of the Enterprise Division. Mr. Pizzuto pointed out that the third position has not yet been filled and is being advertised externally. Councillor G. Lorentz congratulated both Mr. Daly and Mr. Baulk and wished them well in their new positions. 2. 33RD ANNUAL ATHLETIC AWARDS BANQUET The Committee was in receipt of a report dated April 19, 2000 from Ms. L. Bulgin, Supervisor of Athletics, requesting that the City continue to host its Annual Athletics Awards Banquet and that funding be provided in the 2001 budget for the purpose of holding the event. Councillor T. Galloway stated that he was in support of this event; however, felt that better promotion was needed. In this regard, he suggested that staff consider highlighting individual athletes in the local newspaper in a similar manner as undertaken by the City of Waterloo for its award recipients. Mr. R. Wyatt agreed to follow through on this suggestion. On motion by Councillor C. Weylie - it was resolved: "That the City of Kitchener host the 33rd Annual Athletic Awards Banquet on or around Thursday, February 15, 2001 at Resurrection Catholic Secondary School in the same format as the 1999 banquet; and further, That the same amount of funds be included in the 2001 budget as in 2000, in order to hold the event in recognition of an estimated 300 athletes." 3. ONTARIO HOCKEY ASSOCIATION ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING RECEPTION The Committee was in receipt of a report dated April 25, 2000 from Mr. R. Wyatt, Interim Assistant General Manager, requesting financial support to host a reception for the Ontario Hockey Association's Annual General Meeting to be held in Kitchener. On motion by Councillor T. Galloway - it was resolved: "That Council approve the request of the Ontario Hockey Association (O.H.A.) for financial sponsorship in the amount of $1,500.00 to host a reception for the O.H.A.'s Annual General Meeting to be held in Kitchener on June 16 and 17, 2000." KINSMEN AND KINETTE CLUBS OF CANADA - "MESSAGE OF SUPPORT CAMPAIGN" The Committee was in receipt of a report dated April 25, 2000 from Mr. R. Wyatt, Interim Assistant General Manager, recommending that the request of the Kinsmen and Kinette Clubs of Canada to place a "Message of Support" in the KIN's National Magazine not be supported. Councillor C. Weylie advised that she was prepared to move approval of the staff COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES MAY 1, 2000 - 28 - CITY OF KITCHENER recommendation; however, suggested that a letter of appreciation be sent in place of the ad and KINSMEN AND KINETTE CLUBS OF CANADA - "MESSAGE OF SUPPORT CAMPAIGN" (CONT'D) that this be included in the recommendation. Mr. R. Wyatt advised that a similar request was made in 1996 and no action was taken at that time. He advised that requests of this nature are frequent and, in lieu of a Council policy, staff are seeking the Committee's direction. On motion by Councillor C. Weylie - it was resolved: "That Council not support the request of the Kinsmen and Kinette Clubs of Canada to place a "Message of Support" in the KIN's National Magazine to say thank you and express appreciation to KIN members in the community; and further, That staff be directed to send a letter of appreciation to the Kinsmen and Kinette Clubs of Canada expressing support and appreciation to KIN members in the community." Councillor M. Yantzi entered the meeting at this time. GRANT REQUESTS - ROSEMOUNT MILLENNIUM COMMUNITY GARDEN - SCARECROW COMMUNITY GARDEN (ST. JAMES-ROSEMOUNT UNITED CHURCH) - CHANDLER-MOWAT-SANDHILLS COMMUNITY GARDEN The Committee was in receipt of 3 separate reports, all dated April 20, 2000 from Mr. T. Potworka, Interim Manager, Parks Operations, requesting Council to approve one time contributions to each of the Rosemount Millennium Community Garden group, the St. James-Rosemount United Church for the Scarecrow Community Garden and the Chandler-Mowat Neighbourhood Association for the Chandler-Mowat-Sandhills Community Garden. Mr. D. Daly advised that since the Community Garden Program was initiated, a number of gardens have been established with 4 gardens being located on public lands. He further advised that as more requests are coming forward, community gardens are seen as an enhancement to the City, creating a sense of neighbourhood pride and helping to lower vandalism and crime. Mr. Daly acknowledged certain individuals in attendance this date to support the grant requests and advised that they would answer any questions the Committee may have. Councillor T. Galloway noted that he had attended the public meeting at which final discussions were undertaken for the Chandler-Mowat-Sandhills Community Garden and wished to thank Mr. T. Potworka and staff for their assistance in developing this project. Councillor M. Yantzi also expressed appreciation for this program and stated that community groups should be encouraged to participate as there may be other opportunities for use of public lands. Mr. D. Daly pointed out that 2 more requests will be coming forward at the Committee's next meeting, being Courtland/Shelley Neighbourhood Association and the Doon Pioneer Park community. On motion by Councillor T. Galloway - it was resolved: "That pursuant to Council Policy 1-272, Council approve a one time contribution to the Rosemount Millennium Community Garden group in the amount of $795.00 for start-up costs for the Rosemount Millennium Community Garden Project, consisting of an in-kind services grant (delivery topsoil, compost) of $295.00 and a cash grant of $500.00." - and - COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES MAY 1, 2000 - 29 - CITY OF KITCHENER GRANT REQUESTS - ROSEMOUNT MILLENNIUM COMMUNITY GARDEN - SCARECROW COMMUNITY GARDEN (ST. JAMES-ROSEMOUNT UNITED CHURCH) - CHANDLER-MOWAT-SANDHILLS COMMUNITY GARDEN (CONT'D) "That pursuant to Council Policy 1-272, Council approve a one time contribution to the St. James-Rosemount United Church in the amount of $1,000.00 for start-up costs for the Scarecrow Community Garden, consisting of an in-kind services grant (delivery topsoil, compost, rototilling) in the amount of $505.00 and a cash grant in the amount of $495.00." - and - "That pursuant to Council Policy 1-272, Council approve a one time contribution to the Chandler-Mowat Neighbourhood Association in the amount of $1,000.00 for start-up costs for the Chandler-Mowat-Sandhills Community Garden, consisting of an in-kind services grant (delivery topsoil, compost, rototilling) in the amount of $545.00 and a cash grant in the amount of $455.00; and further, That the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute any necessary documentation as required by the City Solicitor to allow the Chandler-Mowat-Sandhills Community Garden to be located on public lands known as Chandler Park." 6. COUNCIL POLICY RESOLUTION 1-287 AMENDMENT RE: HOT AIR BALLOONS INSURANCE The Committee was in receipt of a report dated April 14, 2000 from Mr. D. Daly, Director of Parks and Environmental Services, requesting that Council Policy Resolution 1-287 respecting hot air balloons be amended. Councillor M. Yantzi questioned if the increase in insurance liability to $2,000,00.00 was acceptable to current operators as this had previously been a concern. Mr. D. Daly advised that a meeting had been held with area balloonists and it was indicated some may incur additional costs to obtain the higher premium; however, he pointed out that other operators already carry $2,000,000.00 insurance and, in some cases even more, including Sundance Balloons who was the most frequent user of Victoria Park for launching purposes. Councillor M. Yantzi also questioned how staff would know who was launching, and when, from public lands. Mr. D. Daly advised that staff have experienced difficulty in monitoring launchings and, accordingly, this is part of the reason that staff are asking for the policy to be amended. In this regard, he advised that operators will now be required to provide the City with a certificate of registration, together with photographs of the balloon and a copy of the balloon pilot's licence. Councillor G. Lorentz questioned if a special permit was required to launch the balloons and Mr. G. Melanson, Assistant City Solicitor, advised that balloonists are regulated under Transport Canada; however, are permitted to launch from private lands provided they have permission of the owner, which in the case of public lands would be the City. Councillor G. Lorentz also questioned if there are any regulations with respect to landing sites and Mr. Melanson replied that while there are certain requirements under Transport Canada regulations there are also exceptions due to weather factors and safety. He advised that if a balloon lands on private property and causes damage there is provision in the regulations that require the balloonist to compensate the land owner. Councillor C. Weylie advised that she has received complaints with respect to the noise of balloons that are flying very Iow over residential areas and questioned if the City would be able to control the path or height of the balloons. Mr. Melanson advised that this would not be likely given the fact that balloonists are governed by Federal regulations and also stated that it would be difficult to lay charges under the Noise By-law for similar reasons. 6. COUNCIL POLICY RESOLUTION 1-287 AMENDMENT RE: HOT AIR BALLOONS COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES MAY 1, 2000 - 30 - CITY OF KITCHENER INSURANCE (CONT'D) Councillor Jake Smola enquired if a policy for launching balloons from other public areas should be formulated and Mr. D. Daly advised that staff want to ensure that launching takes place from a location that can be monitored. In this regard, Victoria Park is felt to be desirable because of its clear sight lines from City Hall; however, he stated that if demand for other alternatives was evident staff could consider amending the policy. Mr. G. Melanson further pointed out that clause 1 of the policy provides that launchings may take place from other areas with special permission from Council. On motion by Councillor M. Yantzi - it was resolved: "That Council amend its Council Policy Resolution 1-287 (Hot Air Balloons - Insurance) by deleting the existing Clause 1 in its entirety and replacing it with new Clauses 1 and 2, as follows: POLICY CONTENT: The launching of hot air balloons shall be limited to Victoria Park unless special permission is received from Council, in advance. A hot air balloon operator shall only be allowed to launch from City property if he/she/it complies with, acknowledges by signature, returns a letter of permission from the General Manager of Community Services or designate, setting out the following conditions: a) Vehicles must not be driven onto the unpaved areas of the park (the "grounds") if and when the grounds are wet or otherwise in a condition susceptible to damage by vehicles. Carrying or dragging equipment onto the grounds is permitted under such conditions provided that no damage is done to the grounds. Otherwise, care and consideration must be given to the public and the grounds when driving on the grounds. b) The operator must provide the City with a copy of the following: a certificate of Registration of Aircraft for your balloon(s), setting out the registration number with an accompanying photograph(s) clearly showing the balloon(s)' marking; and, ii) a copy of your balloon pilot(s)' licence(s). c) The operator must comply with all applicable laws, by-laws and regulations including without limitation Canadian Aviation Regulations and the City of Kitchener Noise By-Law as amended from time to time. d) The operator must provide the City with a certificate of liability insurance for the launching and operation of his/her/its balloon(s) in the amount of at least two million dollars ($2,000,000.00) per occurrence, exclusive of interest and costs. The City must be designated as an Additional Insured under the liability insurance policy. e) The operator must agree to indemnify and save harmless the City from all claims, costs, fines or penalties as it relates to or is associated with his/her/its use of the City's property. f) In the event that damage to the City's or a third party's property occurs, the operator must immediately notify the City. 6. COUNCIL POLICY RESOLUTION 1-287 AMENDMENT RE: HOT AIR BALLOONS COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES MAY 1, 2000 -31 - CITY OF KITCHENER INSURANCE (CONT'D) g) The park, or parts of it, shall not be used for launching if it or parts of it are being used for City endorsed, permitted or sponsored events (including set- up and take down time) or during periods of turf or landscaping renovations. The City will endeavour to give the operator as much notice and information as possible with respect to planned events or renovations." 7. PERSONAL ATTENDANT FOR LEISURE CARD (PAL CARD) The Committee was in receipt of a report dated April 19, 2000 from Ms. M. Sanderson, Supervisor, Leisure Support Services, requesting Council to endorse implementation of the Personal Attendant for Leisure Card. Ms. M. Sanderson advised that the purpose of the PAL Card is to provide a means of accommodation for those persons with disabilities who wish to participate in a municipal recreation or leisure activity with the support of an attendant. The attendant will not be charged an additional program fee as they are present for the sole purpose of assisting the person with the disability. Ms. Sanderson advised that the PAL Card will be recognized for Arts, Culture and Special Events; direct leisure programs at the Breithaupt Centre, Rockway Centre and Victoria School Centre; aquatics; arenas; golf courses; and the Kitchener Memorial Auditorium Complex. She further pointed out that as an ongoing approach to address accommodation of persons with disabilities staff will be reviewing city-wide activities and consulting with region-wide partners for the appropriateness of the PAL concept, including Grand River Transit. Councillor G. Lorentz enquired what assistance, if any, is currently provided and Ms. Sanderson advised that assistance is given in the form of volunteers and there is a similar card already in place for aquatics programs. She pointed out that the PAL Card is intended as an expansion to existing means of assistance for persons with disabilities. On motion by Councillor John Smola - it was resolved: "That Council endorse the implementation of the Personal Attendant for Leisure Card (PAL Card) in the Community Services Department and City-wide as opportunities arise." 8. COMMUNITY CENTRES FEASIBILITY STUDY The Committee was in receipt of a report dated April 19, 2000 from Mr. R. Weber, Manager of Community Development, requesting that the Community Centre Feasibility Study be received and a team of staff from the Community Services and Finance Departments be established to review the study recommendations as they relate to the City's 10 Year Capital Forecast. The Committee was also provided with a copy of the Community Centre Feasibility Study Final Report, dated April 2000. Mr. R. Weber advised that following Council's approval of the criteria with which to proceed with a facility feasibility study, the firm of Monteith Zelinka Priamo Limited in association with the JF Group, were retained to conduct the study. Accordingly, Mr. Weber introduced Ms. J. Monteith, Monteith Zelinka Priamo Limited and Mr. J. Fittenburg, the JF Group, who were in attendance to provide a presentation with respect to the study. Ms. Monteith, together with Mr. Fittenburg, provided a PowerPoint presentation highlighting various aspects of the study, including: · an overview of the key study components including a needs assessment survey, public consultation process, assembly of accurate facility inventory/assessment, demographic profile and analysis of impact of future population trends, identification of local leisure trends · prioritized listing of facility recommendations · financial and management implications. 8. COMMUNITY CENTRES FEASIBILITY STUDY (CONT'D) COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES MAY 1, 2000 - 32 - CITY OF KITCHENER During the course of the presentation, Mayor C. Zehr entered the meeting. Councillor C. Weylie referred to comments made during the presentation that 7 out of 11 Council members were contacted during the consultation process and questioned which Councillors were missed. Ms. J. Monteith advised that she was uncertain which Councillors had not been reached. Councillor Weylie further stated that needs in her Ward relate more to social concerns and questioned how those who cannot afford to pay for programs can be accommodated. Ms. Monteith responded that every municipality struggles with this issue; however, the general criteria for use is based on the ability to pay rather than on gender, age, race or religion. The ability to pay can be assessed on an individual basis and assistance offered through such means as a discount process. In addition, Ms. Monteith stated that skilled staff properly trained to deal with issues of income can help target income range and determine appropriate user fees. Mr. J. Fittenburg further stated that the challenge for program deliverers is to meet the needs while treating all users fairly. He pointed out that the report is offering a systematic approach to delivery of services. Councillor J. Ziegler expressed concern that the Courtland Shelley/Kingsdale neighbourhood was not included in the recommendation and referred to page 50 of the report, which outlines interest of the House of Friendship in sharing a facility with this neighbourhood. Councillor Ziegler pointed out that the area is largely populated with Iow income immigrants and retirees and has great need for a recreational facility. Ms. Monteith advised that in reviewing all needs this community was not assessed as a priority; however, the area was identified as a problem in that geographically it is fragmented by a Provincial highway and is showing a decreasing trend in population. It was felt that this area should be linked to other facilities such as the Chandler-Mowat Community Centre. Councillor J. Ziegler stated that Chandler-Mowat Community Centre was too distant and questioned if Wilson Park would be a suitable location. Ms. Monteith advised that available land in the area, including park land, is minimal and use of Wilson Park will further diminish park land in the area. She pointed out that the recommendations suggest that the area be re-assessed in 5 years to determine if other territories are not meeting the needs of this area. Councillor Ziegler advised that he did not agree with re-assessing in 5 years as he was seeking a solution for the area and would rather have the Courtland Shelley/Kingsdale community included in the recommendations to clearly identify the community as an area of need. Councillor T. Galloway questioned the feasibility of the alternative to relocate the Chandler-Mowat Community Centre to a storefront facility. He expressed the opinion that this was not viable given the high concentration of residential use in the area and suggested that use of Chandler Park would be better whether another portable was used or a permanent structure built. Ms. Monteith advised that there was indication for potential relocation to a foodstore. She further advised that this area needs to be re-assessed as very little land or vacant structures are available and the whole corridor along Ottawa Street is being looked at. Ms. Monteith also advised that part of the problem is that scheduling is already in place for other facilities and it becomes a matter of priority in terms of the greatest need and where growth creates demand. Councillor Galloway stated that, in his opinion, this was a high needs area that requires a permanent facility to meet the needs. Councillor B. Vrbanovic referred to the recommendations regarding staffing and questioned if the consultant was aware of the Galloway Report as this study's recommendations seem to be inconsistent with the restructuring plan for the Community Services Department. Mr. Fittenburg responded that they had received only the summary report very late into the process for this study; however, he did not view the 2 studies as being in conflict with one another. He stated that in offering a high level of support it will ensure that the City understands the needs before services are provided and the role of the facilitator may change; however, provided there are no new requirements, the 2 reports should be workable together. Councillor M. Yantzi expressed concern that the study focuses on buildings rather than programming and questioned if there were any other models of comparison. Ms. Monteith responded that during the consultation process the public expressed primary concern with available space and pointed out that programming is not viable if there is no where to carry it out. COMMUNITY CENTRES FEASIBILITY STUDY (CONT'D) She stated that it is important to prioritize capital dollars and then programming can be COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES MAY 1, 2000 - 33 - CITY OF KITCHENER determined. Mr. Fittenburg also stated that present partnerships with School Boards will be changing which will have an impact on available space. He advised that the study attempts to provide a logical approach but does not negate that decisions may be different per centre. Councillor G. Lorentz referred to the vast number of statistics that are compiled by staff to justify continuing need of a facility and questioned if this was really necessary. Ms. Monteith responded that certain statistics are important to track the demographics and needs of an area neighbourhood and to ensure all interest groups are being included. Mr. Fittenburg further pointed out that statistics can assist in evaluating the success of programs and stated that it is important to collect relevant data to assist in better management of the facilities. Councillor Lorentz questioned how the municipality compares to others in provision of community facilities and Ms. Monteith stated that while some other municipalities may be ahead, Kitchener has a good community organization in existence, co-operation with School Boards is excellent and the successes are due in large part to the level of staff support and how they work with the community. Councillor B. Vrbanovic advised that he was prepared to move approval of the recommendations; however, wished to amend the fourth recommendation to provide that the report to be prepared for consideration by the Community Services Committee be presented prior to the end of the term of the present Council. In addition, he stated that he would like to add 2 recommendations, the first being that the Courtland Shelley/Kingsdale community be reconsidered for placement in the priority list and, second, that staff conduct a review of potential sites in the Stanley Park area and report back with potential recommended sites as soon as possible. Councillor J. Ziegler stated that he could support the amendments, subject to the recommendation regarding Courtland Shelley/Kingsdale community including that the needs for a facility be recognized and Councillor Vrbanovic accepted this as a friendly amendment. Mr. F. Pizzuto stated that staff will need to obtain additional input from the Consultant to fully realize the complex issues relevant to this area and will undertake to do so. On motion by Councillor B. Vrbanovic - it was resolved: "That the Community Centre Feasibility Study, prepared by Monteith Zelinka Priamo Limited in association with the JF Group, be received; and, That a team comprised of staff from the Community Services Department and Finance Department be established to review the study recommendations as they relate to the City's 10 Year Capital Forecast; and, That community groups and neighbourhood associations identified in the study and who stand to be affected by the recommendations be approached for feedback and input into a report; and, That staff prepare a report for the Community Services Committee prior to the end of the term of the present Council outlining a preferred implementation strategy and costing based on recommendations identified in the study; and, That in preparing the report, the Kingsdale and Courtland/Shelley community needs be recognized and be reconsidered for placement in the priority list; and further, That in light of the ultimate possible ranking of Stanley Park and the pace of development in the Stanley Park area, staff conduct a review of relevant sites for potential siting in the Stanley Park area and report back as to a potential recommended site(s) as soon as possible." 9. TREE REMOVAL - 213 SHELDON AVENUE NORTH The Committee was in receipt of a report dated April 19, 2000 from Mr. K. Nihls, Supervisor of Forestry, recommending that the request of the owners of 213 Sheldon Avenue North to remove a Silver Maple tree partially located on their property be refused. COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES MAY 1, 2000 - 34 - CITY OF KITCHENER Ms. C. Scott, owner of 213 Sheldon Avenue North, appeared as a delegation and advised that she and her husband are requesting that the tree be cut down as its size prevents sunlight from coming through and grass from growing. In addition, she advised that they wished to widen their driveway which cannot be done unless the tree is removed. She stated that they are not in favour of trimming the tree as it grows back too quickly and they wish to eliminate any threat to the house the tree may pose. Councillor B. Vrbanovic enquired if Ms. Scott felt that pruning did not sufficiently address their concerns and Ms. Scott replied that they would not be able to widen their driveway if the tree remained. Councillor G. Lorentz enquired if the owners knew it was a City tree when they purchased the property and Ms. Scott advised that they did. Councillor M. Yantzi enquired how many cars are able to park in the existing driveway and Ms. Scott advised that they are able to park 2 cars, one behind the other; however, they wished to be able to park the cars side by side. She further pointed out that the original driveway extended behind the house but this was altered by the previous owner and, accordingly, as the cars are parked now they are very close to the street. Councillor C. Weylie questioned if it would be possible to create another driveway in the location of the existing sidewalk; however, several members of the Committee suggested that there may be by-law restrictions that would prevent such a driveway from being established. Councillor B. Vrbanovic questioned if Ms. Scott was willing to pay the $640.00 cost to remove the tree and Ms. Scott stated that she was prepared to do so. Mr. K. Nihls advised that he would discourage creation of an additional driveway in the area suggested as this would cause substantial disruption to the roots of the existing trees. He stated that while the staff recommendation does not address the owner's desire to widen their driveway, it will address the issues of sunlight and removal of the dead tree limbs. Councillor J. Ziegler stated that in the interest of the environment, residents should be encouraged to retain healthy trees and did not agree with the requested modification based on a desire to widen an existing driveway. Councillor B. Vrbanovic stated that given the fact the tree is close to the property line and partially on private lands, he felt the request was reasonable. He pointed out that the City is undertaking environmental initiatives through tree planting programs throughout the City and, in this case, the owner should be allowed to make decisions respecting their own property. Councillor Jake Smola questioned if the homeowner would be allowed to trim the tree and Mr. Nihls advised that given the fact the tree is 95% located on City property staff regard it as a City tree and, as such, would undertake to do the pruning. Councillor Jake Smola also questioned if the remaining trees were all located on the subject property and Mr. Nihls advised that 1 tree located to the rear of the property was partially on City property as well. On motion by Councillor J. Ziegler - it was resolved: "That Council direct staff not to remove the mature Silver Maple tree located on the flank of 213 Sheldon Avenue North as the tree appears healthy with the exception of a few dead limbs; and further, 9. TREE REMOVAL - 213 SHELDON AVENUE NORTH (CONT'D) That the tree, along with the adjacent tree, be scheduled for pruning to remove the dead limbs clear from the house and to allow more sunlight to filter through." COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES MAY 1, 2000 - 35 - CITY OF KITCHENER 10. 11. 12. INFORMATION ITEMS The Committee was in receipt of the following information reports: · Storm Water Management Policy · New Gross Gate Record - Dom Cardillo Arena · Portable Skateboard Park · Kitchener Senior Volunteer Services/City of Kitchener Partnership Program · 2000 Community Action Awards - Ministry of Citizenship, Culture and Recreation NOTICE OF MOTION Councillor M. Yantzi gave notice that at the regular Council meeting to be held on May 8, 2000 he would introduce a Motion for Reconsideration of Council's February 14, 2000 decision to not close Raylene Drive and construct a permanent concrete barrier fence from the corner of the property at 115 Hearth Crescent to the corner of the property at 60 Westmount Road West, with the remaining remnant parcels from the closure of Filsinger Road to be disposed of to abutting owners. REGIONAL REFORM STEERING COMMITTEE - SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS 13. Councillor B. Vrbanovic provided an update on the Steering Committee's schedule of meetings pertaining to discussions relative to Regional reform as follows: · May 3- cancelled; · May 6 - proceeding as scheduled; · May 10 - tentative - conflicts with a Regional Caucus meeting; · May 18 - remains on agenda for discussion; and, · June 3 to 5 - cancelled - conflicts with F,C,M, meetings - no alternative scheduled, Councillor B. Vrbanovic further advised that a conference call will be held later this date with the Consultant to further discuss the issues of scheduling and members of the Committee requested, and Councillor Vrbanovic agreed, to provide an update via e-mail. ADJOURNMENT On motion, the meeting adjourned at 3:25 p.m. Janet Billett Committee Administrator