HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlng & Econ Dev - 1992-09-14PED\1992-09-14
PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 14,1992
The Planning and Economic Development Committee met this date commencing at 4:05 p.m. under the
Chairmanship of Alderman J. Ziegler, with the following members present: Mayor D.V. Cardillo and
Aldermen B. Stortz, M. Wagner, M. Yantzi, J. Smola, G. Leadston, C. Zehr, T. Galloway, G. Lorentz and
C. Weylie.
Officials Present:
Mr. S. Klapman, Mr. B. Stanley, Mr. T. McCabe, Mr. D. Snow, Mr. D. Mansell, Mr. P.
Wetherup, Mr. Z. Janecki, Mr. J. Witmer, Ms. P. MacPherson, Ms. V. Gibaut,
Mr. J. Shivas, Ms. L. MacDonald, and Mr. L.W. Neil
1. MINUTES
Before considering its Minutes of the meeting held on August 10, 1992 the Committee was
requested to amend these Minutes in order to record that Mr. Paul Puopolo appeared as a
delegation in regard to Kitchener Planning and Development Staff Report PD 79/92 - City of
Kitchener Response to the proposed Private Servicing Amendment to the Regional Official
Policies Plan. Mr. Puopolo's presentation was recorded but not transcribed into the official
Minutes of the meeting. He had advised that he was representing Harold Seegmiller (Rockway
Holdings) and the majority of landowners in Breslau and had indicated to the Committee that while
he supported deferral of the Private Services Amendment, he was opposed to deferral of the
Grand River Trunk Study by the Region of Waterloo. The Committee agreed to the requested
amendment.
Moved by Mayor D.V. Cardillo
Seconded by Alderman B. Stortz
That the Minutes of the Planning and Economic Development Committee regular meeting held on
August 10, 1992, as amended this date and the special meeting held on August 12, 1992, as
mailed to the members, be accepted.
Carried
CORRESPONDENCE
Makinq Cities Livable Conference, Charleston S. Carolina - March 8-12/93
The Committee was provided with information respecting registration at the above noted
conference and any committee member wishing further information was requested to contact Mr.
S. Klapman.
PERMITTED USES - 2209 KINGSWAY DRIVE
Ms. Bobbie Pahl appeared as a delegation before the Committee regarding the property known
municipally as 2209 Kingsway Drive with respect to her request that a bridal rental business rather
than the existing use be permitted on the property. It was noted that the current C-6 zoning does
not allow for a bridal rental business but she asked that the permitted uses under that zoning
category be reviewed.
Moved by Alderman G. Lorentz
Seconded by Alderman B. Stortz
That the Commissioner of Planning and Development be requested to review permitted uses
under existing zoning of the property known municipally as 2209 Kingsway Drive and evaluate a
request for a bridal rental business to locate on the subject property.
And further, that a report on this matter be considered at the meeting of the Planning and
Economic Development Committee to be held on October 5, 1992.
Carried
PLANNING AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MINUTES
- 270 -
SEPTEMBER 14, 1992
PERMITTED USES - 2209 KINGSWAY DRIVE (CONT'D)
The Chairman advised that this recommendation would be considered by City Council at its
meeting to be held on Monday, September 21, 1992.
PD 74/92 - HIGHLAND ROAD EAST
- ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION 92171HIZJ (SCHARRY INVESTMENTS INC.)
- ROCKWAY-ST. MARY'S WARD
The Committee was advised that the Department of Planning and Development was in receipt of
an application from Scharry Investments Inc. to change the zoning of lands located on the east
side of Highland Road just south of Stifling Avenue. The proposed zoning change is from Semi-
Restricted Residential (R2B) to Semi-Restricted Residential (R2) according to By-Law 4830. In
this regard the Committee considered Staff Report PD 74/92 dated August 13, 1992 and the
proposed By-Law dated August 13, 1992 attached to the Report. It was noted in the Report that
the subject property has a lot area of 0.237 hectares (0.586 acres) and a frontage of 21.38 metres
(70.17 feet) along Highland Road. The applicant intends to rezone the subject lands in order to
erect a 21 unit, 3-storey apartment building.
It was pointed out that notice that the Committee would hold a public meeting this date to consider
this matter had previously been given.
Mr. Z. Janecki advised that staff had nothing further to add to the report under consideration.
Mr. Bill O'Neil, 139 Old Park Lane, appeared as a delegation on behalf of the applicant to advise
of concurrence with the recommendation in the Staff Report.
No other delegations responded to the Chairman's invitation to address the Committee on this
matter.
Moved by Alderman B. Stortz
Seconded by Alderman G. Lorentz
That Zone Change Application 92/7/HIZJ (Scharry Investments Inc.) requesting a change in
zoning from Semi-Restricted Residential (R2B) to Semi-Restricted Residential (R2) according to
By-law 4830 on Part of Lots 16, 17, 18 and 19, Registered Plan 25, more specifically described as
Parts 1 and 2, Plan 58R-1564, be approved, in the form shown in the proposed By-law attached,
dated August 13, 1992, subject to the following conditions being satisfied prior to any readings of
the Amending Zoning By-law by Council.
To arrange for notification by letter from the Regional Municipality of Waterloo to the City's
Clerk, that all Regional requirements have been satisfied with respect to the proposed
zone change.
The Owner acknowledges that Condition 1 hereof is required to be satisfied no later than
seven (7) months from Council having approved by resolution, the amending zoning
by-law relative to the Zone Change Application 92/7/H/ZJ. In the event this requirement is
not fulfilled within the seven month period, Council shall consider rescinding its zone
change approval.
It is the opinion of this Committee that the approval of this application is proper planning for the
City and is in conformity with the City's Approved Official Plan.
Carried
The Chairman advised that this recommendation would be considered by City Council at its
meeting to be held on Monday, September 21, 1992.
PD 62~92
- 121 BLUCHER STREET
- ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION 911241BIPMc (LARRY PAUSER)
PLANNING AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MINUTES
- BRIDGEPORT-NORTH WARD
SEPTEMBER 14, 1992
The Committee was advised that the Department of Planning and Development was in receipt of
an application from Larry Pauser to change the zoning of lands known municipally as 121
Blucher Street. The proposed zoning change is from Restricted Residential (R2A) to Semi-
restricted Residential (R2B) with a deletion of uses and an addition of special regulations all
according to By-Law 4830. In this regard the Committee considered staff report PD 62/92 dated
July 28, 1992 and the proposed By-Law dated July 29, 1992 attached to the report. It was noted
in the report that the subject lands are located on the southwest corner of Blucher Street and
Dieppe Avenue and have a lot area of 555 square metres (5,974 square feet). The purpose of
the application is to rezone the property to permit the use of the existing building as a duplex.
It was pointed out that notice that the Committee would hold a public meeting this date to
consider this matter had previously been given.
Mr. T. McCabe pointed out that a previous application to allow for a triplex on the property had
been refused and then commented on issues that were noted in the staff report. He indicated
that he had nothing further to add to the report under consideration.
Alderman J. Smola stated that he had a number of concerns concerning this application and also
pointed out that he understood a tenant was occupying the third unit illegally and that another
major concern was with respect to parking arrangements for the use proposed.
Mr. Ed Dopp appeared as a delegation on behalf of area residents, many of whom were in
attendance to oppose the zone change application. Mr. Dopp advised that the owner of the
subject property had three electric meters for the property registered with the Hydro-Electric
Commission, with two meters being registered in July and another one in August. He also
pointed out that as of two weeks ago the third illegal living unit was occupied by a tenant. Mr.
Dopp also indicated that the applicant who was a non-resident owner, never arranged for snow
shovelling of the public sidewalk and that lot maintenance was poor. He also stated that the
property was currently listed for sale with a real estate firm as having a triplex use. Mr. Dopp
requested that the application be refused and the basement living unit be dismantled.
Alderman M. Yantzi cautioned those in attendance that if the Committee refused the application,
and if the applicant appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board, the Board might rule in favour of
the applicant.
No other delegations responded to the Chairman's invitation to address the Committee on this
matter.
Moved by Alderman J. Smola
Seconded by Alderman C. Weylie
That Zone Change Application 91/24/B/PMc (Larry Pauser) requesting a change in zoning from
Restricted Residential (R2A) to Semi-Restricted Residential (R2B) with a deletion of uses and an
addition of special regulations according to By-law 4830, on Lot 5, Registered Plan 647, be
refused.
It is the opinion of this Committee that the refusal of this application is proper planning for the
City.
Carried
The Chairman advised that this recommendation would be considered by City Council at its
meeting to be held on Monday, September 21, 1992.
PD 70~92 - 260 HURON ROAD
- ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION 921151HIPMc (K. and R. Hardie)
- SOUTH WARD
The Committee was advised that the Department of Planning and Development was in receipt of
an application from Karen and Richard Hardie to change the zoning of lands known municipally
PLANNING AND ECONOMIC - ~72 - SEPTEMBER 14, 1992
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MINUTES
as 260 Huron Road. The proposed zoning change is from Restricted Residential (R2A) to
Restricted Residential (R2A) with an extension of use and special regulations according to By-
Law 4830. In this regard the Committee considered Staff Report PD 70/92 dated July 29, 1992
and the proposed By-Law dated July 2, 1992 attached to the report. It was noted in the report
that the subject property was located on the south side of Huron Road across from the
intersection of Battler Road and that the applicant proposes to establish a planning
consultant/design business as a home occupation with a maximum net floor area of 90 square
meters.
It was pointed out that notice that the Committee would hold a public meeting this date to
consider this matter had previously been given.
Mr. T. McCabe advised that staff had nothing further to add to the report under consideration.
No delegations responded to the Chairman's invitation to address the Committee on this matter.
Moved by Alderman T. Galloway
Seconded by Alderman B. Stortz
That Zone Change Application 92/15/H/PMc (Karen and Richard Hardie) requesting a change in
zoning from Restricted Residential (R2A) to Restricted Residential (R2A) with an extension of
use and special regulations according to By-law 4830 on lands described as part of Lots 7 and
11, Biehn's Tract, designated as Part 4 on Plan 58R-4067, be approved in the form shown in the
proposed By-law attached, dated July 2, 1992, subject to the following conditions being satisfied
prior to
any readings of the By-law by Council.
To arrange for notification by letter from the Regional Municipality of Waterloo to the City's
Clerk, that all Regional requirements have been satisfied with respect to the proposed
development.
The Owner acknowledges that Condition 1 is required to be satisfied no later than seven
(7) months from Council having approved the amending zoning by-law relative to the
Zone Change Application 92/15/H/PMc by resolution. In the event this requirement is not
fulfilled within the seven month period, Council shall consider rescinding its zone change
approval.
It is the opinion of this Committee that the approval of this application is proper planning for the
City and is in conformity with the City's Approved Official Plan.
Carried
The Chairman advised that this recommendation would be considered by City Council at its
meeting to be held on Monday, September 21, 1992.
PD 88~92 - 3211 AND 3217 KING STREET EAST
-ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION 89/14/K/ZJ (1. and D. CRNEKOVIC)
- CHICOPEE WARD
Alderman J. Ziegler disclosed a conflict of interest, vacated the Chair and abstained from all
discussion as his property is located within the circulation area of the subject zone change.
Alderman C. Weylie, Vice-Chairman, assumed the Chair to conduct this portion of the meeting.
The Committee was advised that the Department of Planning and Development was in receipt of
an application from Ivan and Dragica
PD 88~92 - 3211 AND 3217 KING STREET EAST
-ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION 89/14/K/ZJ (I. and D. CRNEKOVIC)
- CHICOPEE WARD 9 (CONT'D)
Crnekovic to change the zoning of lands known municipally as 3211 and 3217 King Street East.
The proposed zoning change is from Agricultural (A) to Semi-Restricted (R2) according to By-law
4830. In this regard the Committee considered Staff Report PD 88/92 dated August 10, 1992
and the proposed By-law dated July 28, 1992 attached to the report. It was noted in the report
PLANNING AND ECONOMIC - ~?$ - SEPTEMBER 14, 1992
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MINUTES
that the subject property was located on the south side of King Street East halfway between
Fairway Road and Cameo Drive and had a lot area of 0.526 hectares (1.3 acres) and a frontage
along King Street of 39.568 metres (129.82 feet).
It was pointed out that notice that the Committee would hold a public meeting this date to
consider this matter had previously been given.
Mr. T. McCabe advised that staff had nothing further to add to the report under consideration.
Alderman C. Zehr expressed a general concern with respect to intensified development along the
entire length of King Street East in this area and the fact that there was no sidewalk for
increasing numbers of residents that was creating a safety hazard particularly in the winter when
the road shoulders are obstructed by snow accumulation. He questioned the procedure relative
to provisions for a sidewalk and Mr. D. Mansell advised that with every development agreement
the City obtains funding to support the future installation of a sidewalk but that the Region does
not have all of the necessary widenings to allow for installation. In addition upgrading of this
section of King Street East which would then allow for sidewalk construction as a result of re-
engineering of the road right-of-way was many years away in consideration of the Region's roads
program. Mr. D. Snow suggested that it may be that Transit stops could be worked on as part of
an interim solution for the benefit of pedestrians. Alderman C. Zehr stated that a solution must
be found to this increasing hazard.
Ms. Maryanne Crnekovic, 45 Chartwell Court, appeared as a delegation representing Ivan and
Dragica Crnekovic and advised that they were in agreement with the recommendations
contained in the staff report.
No other delegations responded to the Chairman's invitation to address the Committee on this
matter.
Moved by Alderman G. Leadston
Seconded by Alderman B. Stortz
That Zone Change Application 89/14/K/ZJ (Ivan & Dragica Crnekovic) requesting a change in
zoning from Agricultural (A) to Semi-Restricted Residential (R2) according to By-law 4830, on
Lots 20 and 21, Registered Plan 986, be approved, in the form shown in the proposed By-law
attached, dated July 28, 1992, subject to the following conditions being satisfied prior to any
readings of the Amending Zoning By-law by Council.
To arrange for notification by letter from the Regional Municipality of Waterloo to the City's
Clerk, that all Regional requirements have been satisfied with respect to the proposed
zone change.
The Owner acknowledges that Condition 1 hereof is required to be satisfied no later that
seven (7) months from Council having approved by resolution, the amending zoning by-
law relative to the Zone Change Application 89/14/K/ZJ. In the event this requirement is
not satisfied within the seven month period, Council shall consider rescinding its zone
change approval.
It is the opinion of this Committee that the approval of this application is proper planning for the
City and is in conformity with the City's Approved Official Plan.
Carried
PD 88~92 - 3211 AND 3217 KING STREET EAST
-ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION 921151HIPMc (I. and D. CRNEKOVIC)
- CHICOPEE WARD 9 (CONT'D)
Alderman J. Ziegler previously disclosed a conflict of interest and abstained from all discussion
and voting as his property is located within the circulation area of the subject application.
Alderman C. Weylie, Vice-Chairman, advised that this recommendation would be considered by
City Council at its meeting to be held on Monday, September 21, 1992.
Alderman C. Weylie then vacated the Chair which was assumed by Alderman J. Ziegler,
Chairman who conducted the remainder of the meeting.
PLANNING AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MINUTES
- 274 -
SEPTEMBER 14, 1992
8. PD 81/92
CENTRE WARD
- 296 FREDERICK STREET
- ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION 921221FICL (LESLIE TOTH)
The Committee was advised that the Department of Planning and Development was in receipt of
an application from Leslie Toth to change the zoning of lands known municipally as 296
Frederick Street. The proposed zoning change is from Semi-Restricted Residential (R2B) to
Restricted Commercial (C3) with a special list of uses all according to By-law 4830. In this
regard the Committee considered Staff Report PD 81/92 dated August 7, 1992 and the proposed
By-law dated August 10, 1992 attached to the report. It was noted in the report that the subject
lands are located on the west side of Frederick Street between Locust Street and Chestnut
Street. The applicant intends to rezone the subject lands to permit the conversion and/or use of
the existing building for offices and residential uses in accordance with those uses permitted in
the Central Frederick Secondary Plan.
It was pointed out that notice that the Committee would hold a public meeting this date to
consider this matter had previously been given.
Mr. T. McCabe advised that staff had nothing further to add to the report under consideration
other than to point out that the procedure was seen as an interim by-law for the time being
pending Stage 6 of the Comprehensive By-law.
No delegations responded to the Chairman's invitation to address the Committee on this matter.
Moved by Alderman G. Lorentz
Moved by Alderman M. Wagner
That Zone Change Application 92/22/F/CL (Leslie Toth) requesting a change in zoning from
Semi-Restricted Residential (R2B) to Restricted Commercial (C3) with a special list of uses all
according to By-law 4830 on Part Lot 8, Plan 111, be approved in the form shown in the
proposed By-law attached, dated August 10, 1992, subject to the following conditions being
satisfied prior to any readings of the By-law by Council.
To arrange for notification by letter from the Regional Municipality of Waterloo to the City's
Clerk, that all Regional requirements have been satisfied with respect to the proposed
development.
The Owner acknowledges that Condition 1 is required to be satisfied no later than seven
(7) months from Council having approved the amending zoning by-law relative to the
Zone Change Application 92/22/F/CL by resolution. In the event this requirement is not
fulfilled within the seven month period, Council shall consider rescinding its zone change
approval.
8. PD 81/92 - 296 FREDERICK STREET
- ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION 921221FICL (LESLIE TOTH)
CENTRE WARD (CONT'D)
It is the opinion of this Committee that the approval of this application is proper planning for the
City and is in conformity with the City's Approved Official Plan.
Carried
The Chairman advised that this recommendation would be considered by City Council at its
meeting to be held on Monday, September 21, 1992.
PD 87~92 - ADDRESS CHANGE PROPOSAL
- 520 LANCASTER STREET W. TO 585 BRIDGEPORT ROAD
- BRIDGEPORT NORTH WARD
The Committee was in receipt of Planning and Development Staff Report PD 87/92 dated August
PLANNING AND ECONOMIC - ~?!~ - SEPTEMBER 14, 1992
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MINUTES
18, 1992 advising that the City had received a request to change the address of the property
known municipally as 520 Lancaster Street West to 585 Bridgeport Road. It was noted in the
report that the extension of Bridgeport Road has resulted in the property now having frontage on
Bridgeport Road rather than the access previously enjoyed from Lancaster Street West.
The Committee was advised that staff had nothing further to add to the report under
consideration.
No delegations were registered respecting this matter.
Moved by Alderman G. Lorentz
Seconded by Alderman B. Stortz
That Kitchener's City Council approve the property address change, for property assessment roll
number 6-02-048, from 520 Lancaster St. W. to 585 Bridgeport Road, to be effective October 1,
1992, in the form shown in the Proposed By-law attached and dated August 18, 1992.
Carried
The Chairman advised that this recommendation would be considered by City Council at its
meeting to be held on Monday, September 21, 1992.
10.
PD 85~92 - HOMER WATSON BLVD. AND BLOCK LINE ROAD EXTENSION
- MINOR CHANGE TO ZONING BY-LAW AND CHANGE TO DRAFT PLAN
APPROVAL CONDITIONS (DREWLO HOLDINGS)
- ZCA 881711BIZJ AND SUBD. 30T-86035
- FAIRVIEW WARD
The Committee was in receipt of Planning and Development Staff Report PD 85/92 dated
September 2, 1992 concerning a change to the proposed zoning by-law for zone change
application 88/71/B/ZJ and revisions to Council's conditions for Draft Plan of subdivision 30T-
86035 (Drewlo Holdings Ltd). It was noted in the report that through the Region's final review of
the plan, several minor changes were requested to the draft plan and these were explained in the
report.
Mr. T. McCabe briefly explained all of the changes which were considered minor in nature and in
no way affected an adjacent subdivision.
Mr. P. Britton appeared as a delegation on behalf of Drewlo Holdings and indicated support of
the recommendations contained in the staff report.
No delegations were registered respecting this matter.
10.
PD 85~92 - HOMER WATSON BLVD. AND BLOCK LINE ROAD EXTENSION
- MINOR CHANGE TO ZONING BY-LAW AND CHANGE TO DRAFT PLAN
APPROVAL CONDITIONS (DREWLO HOLDINGS)
- ZCA 881711BIZJ AND SUBD. 30T-86035
- FAIRVlEW WARD (CONT'D)
Moved by Alderman B. Stortz
Moved by Alderman M. Wagner
That the "Proposed By-law" dated April 6, 1992 for Zone Change Application 88/71/B/ZJ
(Drewlo Holdings Inc.) be replaced with the attached "Proposed By-law" dated August 31,
1992.
That the Plan of Subdivision dated 90 12 03 be replaced with the attached Plan of
Subdivision dated Revised 92 08 14.
That the City Solicitor be authorized to change the conditions related to Subdivision
Application 30T-86035 (Drewlo Holdings Inc.) approved by City Council on May 18, 1992
to reflect the changes to the numbering of lots and blocks and that the following new
PLANNING AND ECONOMIC - :~?~ -
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MINUTES
subsection be added to condition 51 as follows:
SEPTEMBER 14, 1992
c)
That Stage 3 of this Plan of Subdivision may register immediately consecutive with
or subsequent to the registration of Draft Plan of Subdivision 30T-86036.
That no further notice be required prior to the passing of the zoning by-law since the
changes are minor and do not change the general nature of the subdivision or intensity of
development.
Carried
The Chairman advised that this recommendation would be considered by City Council at its
meeting to be held on Monday, September 21, 1992.
11.
11.
PRESENTATION -INFORMATION ONLY
- HIGHWAY #7 PLANNING STUDY
- WELLINGTON STREET TO THE GRAND RIVER
- MCCORMACK, RANKIN AND MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION OF
ONTARIO
- BRIDGEPORT-NORTH WARD
Mr. Kieth Anderson, Ministry of Transportation, London and Mr. Martin Scott, McCormack,
Rankin, Mississauga appeared before the Committee to provide information relative to the
Highway #7 Planning Study from Kitchener to Guelph and more specifically from Wellington
Street to the Grand River within the boundary of the City of Kitchener. Mr. Anderson advised that
the plan has been worked on for three years and that a number of changes have been made
since 1990 when preliminary plans were presented. He indicated that they were now ready to
proceed with a recommendation that would be tabled at Public Information Open Houses being
held on September 30 and October 1, 1992. Mr. M. Scott reviewed the Kitchener portion of the
project and the changes that have been made since the last presentation was made to Planning
Committee. He very closely reviewed the changes that have been made in and around the
intersection of Highway 86 and Wellington Street and ramps serving this interchange.
Alderman B. Stortz questioned what the timing for the project might be. Mr. Scott indicated that a
complete Environmental Assessment was necessary, that approximately two years would be
required to conclude necessary property purchases after which the project would be prioritized
by the province. Mr. Anderson assured the Committee that the Highway #7 project was
considered a high priority at the provincial level.
As a result of the latest proposals for alignment of new Highway #7 Mr. T. McCabe questioned
the approach that the Planning Department should be taking with respect to requests for
development anywhere near to the latest preferred route. Mr. Scott replied that until the
Environmental
PRESENTATION -INFORMATION ONLY
- HIGHWAY #7 PLANNING STUDY
- WELLINGTON STREET TO THE GRAND RIVER
- MCCORMACK, RANKIN AND MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION OF
ONTARIO
- BRIDGEPORT-NORTH WARD (CONT'D)
Assessment was approved, any development plans should be considered premature and that
staff should advise prospective developers that an Environmental Assessment was underway.
Ms. V. Gibaut drew attention to a building that the City is trying to sell in the Bridgeport Business
Park that would be affected by the Highway #7 project.
12.
PD 89~92 - SPECIAL MEETINGS OF PLANNING COMMITTEE TO DISCUSS HOUSING
REPORTS
PD 90~92 - THE SECONDARY UNIT APARTMENT EXPERIENCE IN THE CITY OF
KITCHENER
PLANNING AND ECONOMIC - ~?? - SEPTEMBER 14, 1992
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MINUTES
The Committee was in receipt of Planning and Development Staff Report PD 89/92 dated
September 3, 1992 advising that at the Planning and Economic Development Committee
meeting held August 10, 1992, the members received the Municipal Housing Statement, two
official plan amendments dealing with second units in single detached dwellings and the staff
response to the provincial government's consultation paper, "Apartments in Houses". The
Committee had directed that staff make recommendations with respect to future meeting dates
that these matters would be considered.
The Committee was also in receipt of staff report PD 90/92 dealing with a report "Secondary Unit
Apartment Experience in the City of Kitchener" and recommending that this report also be
considered as part of discussions taking place relative to the reports dealing with apartments in
houses and secondary apartment units.
Moved by Alderman G. Lorentz
Seconded by Alderman J. Smola
That Planning and Economic Development Committee schedule the following dates to address
several housing studies and reports that require resolution of Council:
Municipal Housing Statement
- Monday, October 19, 1992 at 4:00 p.m.
Homes)
2. Official Plan Amendment OPA/92/11 (Second Dwellings in Single
Detached
Official Plan Amendment OPA/92/12 (Central Frederick
Secondary Plan - Second Dwellings in Single
Provincial Consultation Paper, "Apartments in Houses".
- Monday, November 9, 1992 at 4:00 p.m.
Neighbourhood
Detached Houses)
Carried
Moved by Alderman G. Lorentz
Seconded by Alderman J. Smola
That the report titled, "The Secondary Unit Apartment Experience in the City of Kitchener"
attached to staff report PD 90/92 be tabled for information and considered as part of the
discussions taking place at the Special Meeting of Planning Committee established to discuss
the Provincial Consultation Paper and the Official Plan Amendments dealing with the subject of
Secondary Apartment Units.
Carried
The Chairman advised that these recommendations would be considered by City Council at its
meeting to be held on Monday, September 21, 1992.
13.
PD 88/92 - KITCHENER'S RESPONSE TO THE PROPOSED VISIONS DOCUMENT
"TOWARDS 2021" FOR THE REGION OF WATERLOO
The Committee was in receipt of staff report PD 88/92 dated August 1, 1992 dealing with a
response to the document of the Region of Waterloo titled "Towards 2021: Shaping our Regional
Vision Together". Vision E and a Vision K were attached to the staff report and the main
differences were pointed out.
Ms. B. Newell noted that Vision K was considered tame compared to Vision E and if the Grand
River Trunk Sewer System was to go ahead annexation of Breslau and the Airport area would
have to be addressed. Mr. B. Stanley commented that since the Region brought forward the
proposal for a regional trunk system then if the City was going to assume the costs of the system
other benefits must be available to the municipality.
Alderman C. Zehr responded that the rationale makes the assumption that the City would be
paying these costs but noted that payment for the Trunk System was not a foregone conclusion
and that the City's portion could be reduced substantially.
Mr. Stanley noted that the Regional Vision C proposes a modest expansion of Breslau and that
with this scenario the City of Kitchener was in a much better position to take advantage of this
PLANNING AND ECONOMIC - ~78 - SEPTEMBER 14, 1992
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MINUTES
occurrence from a regional economic point of view. It was noted that should this happend then it
would result in the shift of development pattern taking place.
Moved by Alderman M. Wagner
Seconded by Alderman B. Stortz
That Kitchener Council submit Vision" K" to the Region of Waterloo for consideration in their
visioning exercise, "Towards 2021: Shaping Our Regional Vision Together".
Carried
The Chairman advised that this recommendation would be considered by City Council at its
meeting to be held on Monday, September 21, 1992.
14.
14.
PD 83/92 - DEPARTMENT INITIATIVES TO IMPROVE ENFORCEMENT
- AND -
RESULTS OF OCTOBER 1991 ENFORCEMENT SESSION
At the Committee's August 10th meeting consideration of PD 83/92 dated August 5, 1992 was
deferred at the request of the Legal Department in order to allow them to present their concerns
in caucus session. Prior to the meeting this date the Committee held a caucus meeting relative
to this matter. As a result of that meeting staff were now proposing revisions to the
recommendations contained in staff report PD 83/92.
Moved by Alderman B. Stortz
Seconded by Mayor D. V. Cardillo
That the Staffing and Action Plan regarding By-law Enforcement, attached as Appendix
"A", be accepted for information.
That the attached report entitled "Municipal Enforcement in Ontario" be accepted for
information.
That the current practice of enforcement respecting Zoning, Fence, Sign, Lot
Maintenance, Discarded Refrigerator, and Regulation of Animal By-laws initiated by
complaint be confirmed and expanded to include enforcement initiated by staff respecting
the following:
a) health and safety issues;
b)
lodging houses in accordance with the policy approved by
28, 1991;
Council on October
PD 83/92 - DEPARTMENT INITIATIVES TO IMPROVE ENFORCEMENT
- AND -
RESULTS OF OCTOBER 1991 ENFORCEMENT SESSION (CONT'D)
c) illegal uses discovered through joint inspection with fire or building staff;
d) violations discovered on zone change or Committee of Adjustment refusals; and
e) violations brought to the attention of the City through applications or written
inquiries respecting a property
To continue to give top enforcement priority to violations that deal with safety and health
issues, and in particular, fences or shrubs causing sight obstructions, unsafe swimming
pools, unsafe illegal residential units and discarded refrigerators.
5. That, as directed by Council, Enforcement Staff tar.qet:
a) special types of violation for intensive enforcement, and
b) specific geographical areas for intensive enforcement, and
PLANNING AND ECONOMIC - ;~?~ -
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MINUTES
c) staff target portable signs for intensive
By-law 92-204
SEPTEMBER 14, 1992
enforcement of Sign
That the City Solicitor be directed to arrange for the expeditious approval of short form
wording and set fines and/or any other measures necessary to implement the use of Part
1 Provincial Offence Notices (tickets) for minor zoning violations.
7. To increase public awareness of the City's Enforcement Policies and Procedures by:
a) hosting and participating in by-law educational sessions for neighbourhood
associations, the business community and the general public.
b)
preparing and distributing information pamphlets outlining the Zoning Inspectors'
role, complaint procedures and potential penalties.
8. That this By-law Enforcement policy be reviewed in one year.
Carried
The Chairman advised that this recommendation would be considered by City Council at its
meeting to be held on Monday, September 21, 1992.
15.
DEVELOPMENT CHARGES
Alderman T. Galloway advised that he had received an inquiry from a local builder and pointed
out that various municipalities were suspending, deferring or eliminating development charges
respecting non-residential developments. He suggested that staff be asked to investigate this
matter and determine what benefits if any have accrued to Kitchener as a result of its
development charge policy. Alderman Zehr suggested that the question of volume of activity
also be addressed.
Mr. J. Witmer indicated that he could report regarding statistics that his division has compiled
and it was agreed to refer the entire matter to the Development Charge Committee for
consideration and response to the Planning and Economic Development Committee.
16. SUGGESTED CHANGES TO ENFORCEMENT UNDER THE PLANNING ACT
16.
Ms. L. MacDonald advised the Committee that in discussions with
SUGGESTED CHANGES TO ENFORCEMENT UNDER THE PLANNING ACT (CONT'D)
provincial officials they had suggested that any changes that might be desired for the
enforcement aspect of the Planning Act be conveyed to the province for consideration as part of
its review of the Act.
Moved by Alderman J. Smola
Seconded by Alderman G. Leadston
That we authorize the Kitchener Legal Department to convey to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs
and to the Ministry of Housing, its suggested Changes to the Planning Act that would strengthen
enforcement of the Act.
Carried
The Chairman advised that this recommendation would be considered by City Council at its
meeting to be held on Monday, September 21, 1992.
17.
WIDENING OF WOOLWICH STREET
Alderman J. Smola requested that the City ask that Woolwich Street be deleted from the street
widening list of the Region of Waterloo.
PLANNING AND ECONOMIC - ~80 - SEPTEMBER 14, 1992
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MINUTES
Mr. D. Snow explained that because of a development by Kraushaar resulting in the rerouting of
traffic utilizing Bridge Street, Lancaster Street and Woolwich Street and approval by the Council
of the City of Waterloo of the Subdivision without Kitchener's input, widening of Woolwich Street
was now redundant and should be deleted which would then accomodate the plans of a
Kitchener property owner to proceed with a Committee of Adjustment matter.
Following further discussion Alderman J. Smola agreed to raise this request at the September
21 st Council Meeting for action at that time.
18.
ADJOURNMENT
On motion, the meeting adjourned at 5:38 p.m.
L. W. Neil, AMCT
Assistant City Clerk