HomeMy WebLinkAboutDSD-19-270 - A 2019-124 to A 2019-129 - 204, 205, 208, 212 & 220 Field Sparrow CresStaff ReportAaR
Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca
REPORT TO: Committee of Adjustment
DATE OF MEETING: November 19, 2019
SUBMITTED BY: Juliane von Westerholt, Senior Planner - 519-741-2200 ext. 7157
PREPARED BY: Richard Kelly-Ruetz, Planner— 519-741-2200 ext. 7110
WARD: 1
DATE OF REPORT: November 8, 2019
REPORT #: DSD -19-270
SUBJECT: A2019-124; A2019-125; A2019-126; A2019-127; A2019-128; & A2018-129
204, 205, 208, 209, 212, & 220 Field Sparrow Crescent
Owner — Activa Holdings Inc.
Applicant — Nikita Thompson
Approve
Subject Properties
s d = %11 --
298
2,4
;C2
e
• K _
- 4
285
jo A to
o
h...2 ' •,. .. . ` �
51�2T7
S
R,
274
Location Map: 204, 205, 208, 209, 212 & 220 Field Sparrow Crescent
*** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. ***
Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance.
REPORT
Planning Comments:
The subject properties located at 204, 205, 208, 209, 212, and 220 Field Sparrow Crescent are zoned
Residential Three (R-3) with Special Regulation Provision 304R and 307R in Zoning By-law 85-1 and
designated Low Rise Residential in the City's Official Plan. The applicant is proposing to construct a
single detached dwelling on each property with a maximum driveway width of 8.63 metres, whereas a
maximum driveway width of 8 metres is permitted. This variance will facilitate the construction of dwellings
with 3 -car garages.
Field Sparrow Crescent
City Planning staff conducted a site inspection of the property on November 7, 2019.
In considering the four tests for minor variances as outlined in Section 45(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O.,
1990 Chap. P. 13, as amended, Planning staff offers the following comments.
1. General Intent and Purpose of Official Plan Test
The subject property is designated Low Rise Residential in the Official Plan. The intent of this
designation is to encourage a range of different forms of housing to achieve a low density
neighbourhood. The requested variance to increase the width of the driveway on these properties is
appropriate and will continue to maintain the low density character of the property and surrounding
neighbourhood. It is the opinion of staff that the requested variance meets the general intent of the
Official Plan.
2. General Intent and Purpose of Zoning By-law Test
The intent of the maximum driveway width regulation in the Zoning By-law is to ensure that the
driveway does not dominate the front of the dwelling and by extension, the streetscape. The 6 lots
in question have widths that are wider than average. The lots range in width from 17 metres up to 22
metres. A driveway width of 8.65 metres would not dominate the streetscape or the front yard(s) of
the properties in question due to the relatively large width of each lot. As such, staff is satisfied that
the requested variance to permit a maximum driveway width of 8.65 metres, whereas a maximum of
8 metres is permitted, meets the general intent of the Zoning By-law.
3. "Minor" Test
The variance for the increased driveway width will not present any significant impacts to adjacent
properties or the overall neighbourhood. The zoning regulations on the property require that the
driveway be a maximum of 6 metres within 3 metres of the street line; this will be maintained on the
subject properties. As such, staff is of the opinion that a marginal increase to the 8 metre maximum
driveway width beyond 3 metres from the street line is minor.
4. Desirability for Appropriate Development or Use Test
It is worth noting that there are 6 properties along this section of Field Sparrow Crescent that have
requested a wider driveway through this minor variance application. Assuming the variance is
approved and the dwellings and designed and constructed as planned, there will be several
properties on this street with a similar driveway design, which makes for a more consistent
streetscape. As such, the proposed variance is desirable and appropriate for the use of the land, as
the lots in question are wider than average and therefore suitable to contain a slightly wider driveway
than permitted by the applicable zoning.
Based on the foregoing, Planning staff recommends that this application be approved.
Building Comments:
The Building Division has no objections to the proposed variance.
Transportation Services Comments:
Transportation Services has no concerns with the proposed application.
Heritage Comments:
No Heritage Planning concerns.
Environmental Comments:
No environmental planning concerns.
RECOMMENDATION
A. That Minor Variance Application A2019-124, A2019-125, A2019-126, A2019-127, A2019-128,
and A2019-129 requesting relief from Special Regulation Provision 307R of the Zoning By-
law to have a maximum driveway width of 8.65m, whereas a maximum driveway width of 8
metres is permitted, be approved.
Richard Kelly-Ruetz, BES
Planner
Juliane von Westerholt, BES, MCIP, RPP
Senior Planner
Region of Waterloo
November 05, 2019
Holly Dyson
City of Kitchener
200 King Street West
P.O. Box 1118
Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7
Dear Ms. Dyson:
PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT
AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES
150 Frederick Street, Sth Floor
Kitchener ON N2G 4A Canada
Telephone: 519-575-4400
TTY: 519-575-4608
Fax: 519-575-4449
www. reg i o n ofwate r l o o. ca
File No.: D20-20/
VAR KIT GEN
(13) DEVIT AVENUE DEVELOPMENTS LTD.
(15) 197 FREDERICK STREET TDL GROUP
Re: Committee of Adjustment Meeting on November 19, 2019, City of Kitchener
Regional staff has reviewed the following Committee of Adjustment applications and
have following comments:
1) FN 2019-002
— 123 Mountain Mint Crescent— No Concerns.
2) SG 2019-016
— 500 Fairway Road South — No Concerns.
3) A 2019-111 —
37-39 Pandora Avenue North — No Concerns.
4) A 2019-112 —
45 Heiman Street — No Concerns.
5) A 2019-113 —
47 Heiman Street — No Concerns.
6) A 2019-114 —
45 Maywood Road — No Concerns.
7) A 2019-115 —
593 Charles Street East — No Concerns.
8) A 2019-116—
10 Shanley Street — No Concerns.
9) A 2019-117—
450 Rivertrail Avenue — No Concerns.
10) A 2019-118
— 8 Devon Street — No Concerns.
11) A 2019-119
— 51 David Street — No Concerns.
12) A 2019-120
— 14 Frontier Drive — No Concerns.
13) A 2019-121
— 80-96 Sydney Street North — No Concerns.
14) A 2019-122
— 1092 Queen's Boulevard — No Concerns.
15) A 2019-123
— 181-197 Frederick Street — No Concerns.
16) A 2019-124 thru 129 — 205, 209, 220, 212, 208 & 204 Field Sparrow Crescent —
No Concerns.
17) A 2019-130
— Adjacent to 85 McIntyre Drive — No Concerns.
Please be advised that any development on the subject lands is subject to the
provisions of the Regional Development Charge By-law 14-046 or any successor
thereof and may require the payment of Regional Development Charges for this
development prior to the issuance of a building permit. The comments contained in this
letter pertain to the Application number listed. If a site is subject to more than one
application, additional comments may apply.
Document Number: 3146724
Page 1 of 2
Please forward any decision on the above mentioned application to the undersigned.
Yours Truly,
Joginder Bhatia
Transportation Planner
(519) 575-4500 Ext 3867
Grand River Conservation Authority 400 Clyde Road, P.O. Box 729
Resource Management Division Cambridge, Ontario N 1 R 5W6
Andrew Herreman, Resource Planning Phone: (519) 621-2761 ext. 2228
Technician E-mail: aherreman@grand river. ca
PLAN REVIEW REPORT: City of Kitchener
Holly Dyson
DATE: November 8, 2019 YOUR FILE: See below
RE: Applications for Minor Variance:
FN 2019-002
123 Mountain Mint Crescent
SG 2019-016
500 Fairway Road South
A 2019-111
37-39 Pandora Avenue North
A 2019-112
45 Heiman Street
A 2019-113
47 Heiman Street
A 2019-114
45 Maywood Road
A 2019-115
593 Charles Street East
A 2019-116
10 Shanley Street
A 2019-117
450 Rivertrail Avenue
A 2019-118
8 Devon Street
A 2019-119
51 David Street
A 2019-120 14 Frontier Drive
A 2019-121 80, 86, 92 & 96 Sydney Street North
A 2019-122 1092 Queens Boulevard
A 2019-123 181-197 Frederick Street & 143-147 Lancaster Street East
A 2019-124 to A 2019-129 204, 205, 208, 212 & 220 Field Sparrow Crescent
Applications for Consent:
B 2019-066-071 253 Clark Avenue
GRCA COMMENT:
The above -noted applications are located outside the Grand River Conservation Authority
areas of interest. As such, we will not undertake a review of the applications and plan review
fees will not be required. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please
contact me.
Sincerely,
Andrew Herreman, CPT
Resource Planning Technician
Grand River Conservation Authority
xThese comments are respectfully submitted as advice and reflect resource concerns within the scope and mandate of the Page 1 of 1
Grand River Conservation Authority