HomeMy WebLinkAboutDSD-20-182 - A 2020-088 - 339 Rosemount DrREPORT TO:Committee of Adjustment
th
DATE OF MEETING:November 17, 2020
SUBMITTED BY:Juliane von Westerholt, Senior Planner -519-741-2200 ext. 7157
PREPARED BY:Tim Seyler, Planner–519-741-2200 ext. 7860
WARD:1
th
DATE OF REPORT:November 6,2020
REPORT #:DSD-20-182
SUBJECT:A2020-088–339 Rosemount Drive
Applicant –Rodney Friesen on behalf of Jorge Gomez
Recommendation: Approval
Location Map: 339 Rosemount Drive
REPORT
Planning Comments:
Thesubject property located at 339 Rosemount Driveis zoned Residential Three (R-3)in the Zoning By-
law 85-1 and designated Low Rise Residential in the City’s Official Plan.The applicant is proposing to
*** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. ***
Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance.
convert the single detached dwelling to a duplex dwelling. By converting the single detached dwelling to
a duplex dwelling the subject property can no longer meet the requirements of Section 6.1.1.1 b i) of the
Zoning By-law.The applicant is requesting relief from Section 6.1.1.1 b i) of the Zoning By-law to allow
the onerequired parking space for the proposed duplex to be located in the driveway setback 2.0 metres
from the street line rather than the required 6.0 metres.
City Planning staff conducted a site inspection of the property on November 3, 2020.
339 Rosemount Drive
In considering the four tests for minor variances as outlined in Section 45(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O.,
1990 Chap. P. 13, as amended, Planning staff offersthe following comments.
General Intent of Official Plan
1.The subject property is designated Low Rise Residential in the City’s Official Plan. This designation
permits lowerdensity forms of housing such as duplex dwellings. The intent of the Official Plan is to
encouragearange of different forms of housing and supportsa mix of residential uses at alower
intensity.The proposed variance to legalize the location ofthe one required parking spacein the
drivewayfor a duplex dwellingmeetsthe general intent of the Official Plan.
General Intent of Zoning By-law
2. Therequested variance to legalize the off-street parking space 2.0 metres from the street lot line
meets the general intent of the Zoning Bylaw. Thereduction of 4.0 metres from the required 6 metres
is minor. The intent of the 6.0 metre required setback is to allow for a vehicle to be parked on the
driveway safely, without affecting the City right-of-way and surrounding properties.The current
driveway is double wide whichcanaccommodate2 cars side by side.As the second parking
space is located in the driveway and setback 2.0 metres from the street line,there are noimpacts
anticipated on adjacent residential properties.
Application is Minor
3. Thevariance can be considered minoras it is theopinion of staff that the required parking space
for the duplexcan be accommodated on site in a safe manner.The reduced setback for the required
parking space will not present any significant impacts to adjacent properties and the overall
neighbourhood.
Application in Appropriate
4.The varianceisappropriate for the development and use of the land. The requested varianceshould
not impact any of the adjacent properties or the surrounding neighbourhood.
Proposed parking space locations–339 Rosemount Drive
Based on the foregoing, Planning staff recommends that this application beapprovedsubject to the
conditions outlined below in the Recommendation section of this report.
Building Comments:
The Building Division has no objections to the proposed variance provided building permit for the addition to
the single detached dwelling is obtained prior to construction. Please contact the Building Division @
building@kitchener.ca with any questions.
Transportation Services Comments:
Transportation Services hasno concerns with the proposed application.
Environmental Comments:
Environmental Planning has no concerns with this application.
Heritage Comments:
Heritage Planning has no concerns with this application.
RECOMMENDATION
That minor variance application A2020-088requesting relief from Section 6.1.1.1 b) i) to allow the
required parking space for aduplex dwelling to be setback 2.0metres from the street line rather
than the required 6.0 metres, be approved.
Tim Seyler, BES Juliane von Westerholt, BES, MCIP, RPP
Planner Senior Planner
October 28, 2020
Holly Dyson
City of Kitchener File No.: D20-20/
200 King Street West VAR KIT GEN
P.O. Box 1118
Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7
Dear Ms. Dyson:
Re: Committee of Adjustment Applications October 2020, City of Kitchener
Regional staff has reviewed the following Committee of Adjustment applications and have
following updated comments:
1) A 2020-087 380 Grand River Boulevard No Concerns.
2) A 2020-088 339 Rosemount Drive No Concerns.
3) A 2020-089 34 Dunham Avenue No Concerns.
4) A 2020-090 305 Driftwood Drive No Concerns.
5) A 2020-091 12 Rose Street No Concerns.
6) A 2020-092 180 Grand Flats Trail No Concerns.
7) A 2020-093 41 Valleybrook Drive No Concerns.
8) A 2020-094 53 Valleybrook Drive No Concerns.
9) A 2020-095 236 Woodhaven Road No Concerns.
10) A 2020-096 919 Eaglecrest Court No Concerns.
11) A 2020-097 923 Eaglecrest Court No Concerns.
12) A 2020-098 928 Eaglecrest Court No Concerns.
5ƚĭǒƒĻƓƷ bǒƒĬĻƩʹ ЌЍЍЌЋВЏ
tğŭĻ Њ ƚŅ Ћ
13)A 2020-09980Westwood DriveNo Concernsto the application.However, the
applicants please be advised that any redevelopment application for any noise sensitive
land use on these lands e.g. a Consent / Condominium would have impacts from the
transportation (rail) noise in the vicinity.
14) A 2020-100 9 -11 Samuel Street No Concerns.
15) A 2020-101 8 Devon Street No Concerns.
16) A 2020-102 89 Water Street South No Concerns.
Please be advised that any development on the lands subject to the Applications noted above
are subject to the provisions of the Regional Development Charge By-law 14-046 or any
successor thereof and may require the payment of Regional Development Charges for these
developments prior to the issuance of a building permit. The comments contained in this letter
pertain to the Application numbers listed above. If a site is subject to more than one application,
additional comments may apply.
Please forward any decision on the above mentioned application to the undersigned.
Yours Truly,
Joginder Bhatia
Transportation Planner
P (519) 575-4500 Ext 3867
C (226) 753-0368
November 4, 2020
Holly Dyson, Administrative Clerk Via email only
Legislated Services, City of Kitchener
200King Street West
Kitchener, ON, N2G 4G7
Dear Ms. Dyson,
Re:November 17, 2020 Committee of Adjustment Meeting
______________________________________________________________________
Applications for Minor Variance
A2020-080335Lancaster Street WestA2020-09453Valleybrook Drive
A2020-087380Grand River BoulevardA2020-095236Woodhaven Road
A2020-088339Rosemount DriveA2020-096919Eaglecrest Court
A2020-08934Dunham AvenueA2020-097923Eaglecrest Court
A2020-090305Driftwood DriveA2020-098928Eaglecrest Court
A2020-09112Rose StreetA2020-09980WestwoodDrive
A2020-092180Grand Flats TrailA2020-1009-11Samuel Street
A2020-09341Valleybrook DriveA2020-1018Devon Street
A2020-10289Water Street South
Applications for Consent
B 2020-042101-103Schweitzer Street
B 2020-043440Lancaster Street
B 2020-044956Glasgow Street
The above-noted consent applications are located outside the Grand River Conservation
Authority areas of interest. As such, we will not undertake a review of the applications and plan
review fees will not be required. If you have any questions or require additional information,
please contact me at 519-621-2763 ext. 2228 or aherreman@grandriver.ca.
Sincerely,
Andrew Herreman, CPT
Resource Planning Technician
Grand River Conservation Authority
*These comments are respectfully submitted as advice and reflect resource concerns within the scope and mandate of Page 1of 1
the Grand River Conservation Authority.