Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHK Minutes - 2020-11-03HERITAGE KITCHENER MINUTES NOVEMBER 3, 2020CITY OF KITCHENER The Heritage Kitchener Committee held an electronic meeting this date, commencingat 4:02p.m. Present:A. Reid -Chair Councillors D. Chapman,J. Gazzolaand C. Michaudand,J. Baker, P. Ciuciura,S. Hossack, K. Huxted, V. Mance,B. Mueller,R. Parnell,S. Strohackand D. Vongphakdy. Staff:V. Grohn, Heritage Planner M. Parris, Landscape Architect D. Saunderson, Committee Administrator 1.DSD-20-176-HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION HPA-2020-V-023 -1410 DOON VILLAGE ROAD -PROPOSED 2-CAR GARAGE ADDITION The Committee considered DevelopmentServices Department report DSD-20-176, dated October 20, 2020recommendingapproval of Heritage Permit Application HPA-2020-V-023to permit the construction of a front additionon the property municipally addressed as 1410 Doon Village Roadlocated within the Upper DoonHeritage Conservation District (UPHCD). Victoria Grohn presented the Report, advising staff are recommending approval of the HPA, subject to one condition. In response to questions, V. Grohn advised the correct dimensions for the proposed garage addition is 20 x 24, noting the addition is in full compliance with the Zoning By-lawin regard to setbacks. V. Grohn further advised in regardstostreetscape setbacks,they are inconsistent on the street already and the proposed addition is not likely to adversely impact the setbacks on the street. Questions were raised regarding the District Plan guidelines and whether there were any guidelines related to additions. V. Grohn advised the District does not have specific regulations related to additions and their locations. Several members noted they did not object to the proposed addition. It was noted that there were inconsistencies in the Heritage Permit Application with the proposed measurements, and members wanted to ensure that the proposed addition did not exceed the 20 x 24 measurements as outlined on the hand drawn plan. Additionally, concerns were expressed about whether the HPA may set a precedent for future additions in the District. B. Muellerentered the meeting at this time. The following motion was voted on and was Carried Unanimously. On motion byJordan Baker- it was resolved: “That pursuant to Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Heritage Permit Application HPA-2020-V-023 be approved, as outlined in Development Services Department report DSD-20-176, to permit the construction of a front addition at the property municipally addressed as 1410 Doon Village Road, in accordance with the plans and supplementary information submitted with the application and subject to the following condition: i.That the final building permit drawings be reviewed and heritage clearance provided by Heritage Planning staff prior to the issuance of a building permit.” 2.INS-20-019-RBJ SCHLEGEL PARK HERITAGE RESIDENCE ADAPTIVE RE-USE -COMMITTEE CONSULTATION The Committee considered InfrastructureServices Department report INS-20-019, dated October 20, 2020 regarding the adaptive re-use of an existing Heritage residence at RBJ Schlegel Park as a public washroom and changeroom facility.It was noted aHeritage Permit Application is not required forthe adaptive re-use of the heritage building, however Parks & Cemeteries staff were in attendance to seek comments and feedback from the Committee with respect to the proposed facility design. HERITAGE KITCHENER MINUTES NOVEMBER 3, 2020-26-CITY OF KITCHENER 2.INS-20-019-RBJ SCHLEGEL PARK HERITAGE RESIDENCE ADAPTIVE RE-USE -COMMITTEE CONSULTATION (CONT’D) Mark Parris provided an overview on the construction of the RBJ Schlegel Park completed to date, noting the park was previously known as the South District Park.He stated the property contains a stone house which was identified as having heritage value and significance. M. Parris stated a Heritage Impact Assessment was completed and the building was determined to be structurally sound and was relocated on the site for an adaptive re-use as a washroom and changeroom facility to support the proposed splash pad and playground.He introduced Tara from a+Link Architectswho was retained by the City to complete the detailed design of the new washroom. Tara McLaughlin, a+Link Architects,indicated the proposed facilitydesign, notingthe facility is to include three (3) washroom stalls (two barrier-free, one universal) and four (4) changeroom stalls (three barrier-free and one universal).She indicated the building is proposed to be a three- seasonfacility and is not intended to be heated in the winter. T.McLaughlinprovided an overview of the design to date, including the proposed adaptations for the existing doors, windows and openings; existing millwork; existing dormer; former location of the addition; structural elements; and, the stone and mortar. She indicated the proposed concept considers and highlights the existing and former openings of the heritage building and the former addition, providing new elements that weaves “layers” of new and old through the use of screens/panels that weave into the existing building fabric. In response to questions, M. Parris advised staff have not yet attended the Grand River Accessibility Advisory Committee, but intend on making a presentation to them prior to the end of 2020. Questions were raised regarding the relocation and whether it was deemed to be a viable option for the future. M. Parris advised he joined the project later through the process and could only comment on the physical move. He stated the move was completed in the winter and likely contributed to the successfulof the relocation as theground was frozen and minimized sliding. Several members expressed support for the adaptive reuse of the building, noting the stories related to the building also help contribute to the historical significance of the building. J. Baker cautioned that there is a possibility some heritage value could be lost with the number of new features being proposed for the building, stating the design features should try to preserve the physical look as well as the heritage of the building. D. Vongphakdy questioned whether consideration was given to animalswhoinfiltrate the building. T. McLaughlin advised that topic was discussed by the design team when reviewing the exterior of the building, noting the possibility of constructing a barrier below the roof structure toclose off possible openings. P. Ciuciuraexpressed support for the design and the overall project, noting he was in support of the decision to keep the building unheated. In response to questions, T.McLaughlinadvised the design team was hoping to keep the exterior stone exposed with some type of protective option; that decision is still to be determined. Questions were raised regarding plaquing for the facility. T. McLaughlinadvised that is something that was being considered for the exterior of the building, stating she welcomed any member of the Committee interested in assisting to participate. A. Reid questioned the decision to construct 3 washrooms and 4 changeroom facilities. T. McLaughlin stated the rationalerelated to ensuring full accessibility throughout the entire facility, while maintaining all the necessary building code requirements. In response to questions regarding security, M. Parris indicated there would be security issues regardless. He stated Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) were being considered,noting there were multiple points ofentryand security cameras being proposed. HERITAGE KITCHENER MINUTES NOVEMBER 3, 2020-27-CITY OF KITCHENER 3.STATUS UPDATES -HERITAGE BEST PRACTICES UPDATE AND 2020PRIORITIES -HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOLLOW-UPS V. Grohn advised there wereno status updates for the Committee this date. 4.ADJOURNMENT On motion, this meeting adjourned at4:51p.m. D. Saunderson Committee Administrator