The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutHK Agenda - 2021-01-05l I��i�;�"`�R Office of the City Clerk Kitchener City Hall 200 King St.W. - 2nd Floor Kitchener ON N2G 4G7 Page 1 Chair — Vacant Heritage Kitchener Agenda Tuesday, January 5, 2021 4:00 p.m. - 6:00 p.m. Electronic Meeting Vice -Chair — Vacant Due to COVID-19 and recommendations by Waterloo Region Public Health to exercise physical distancing, City Hall is closed to the public. Members of public are invited to participate in this meeting electronically by contacting the Committee Administrator. While in-person delegation requests are not feasible at this time, members of the public are invited to submit written comments or participate electronically in the meeting by contacting Dianna Saunderson at delegation(cDkitchener.ca. Delegates must register by 12:00 p.m. on January 5, 2021 in order to participate electronically. Written comments will be circulated prior to the meeting and will form part of the public record. Delegations Pursuant to Council's Procedural By-law, delegations are permitted to address the Committee for a maximum of five (5) minutes. • None at this time. Discussion Items 1. Welcome and Committee Member Introductions (5 min) 2. Election of Committee Chair and Vice -Chair (5 min) 3. Committee Orientation (45 min) 4. DSD -21-001 - Heritage Permit Application HPA-2021-IV-001 (20 min) - 38 Shirk Place - Replacement of Windows and Roof, Construction of Dormers, and Construction of Second Storey Rear Yard Addition 5. DSD -21-002 - Heritage Permit Applications HPA-2021-V-002 & HPA-2021-V-003 (20 min) - 172 Queen Street North - Demolition of Detached Garage and Construction of Detached Garage 6. DSD -21-003 - Heritage Permit Application HPA-2021-IV-004 (20 min) - 68 Saddlebrook Court - Construction of an Addition 7. Status Updates - Heritage Best Practices Update and 2021 Priorities (5 min) - Heritage Impact Assessment Follow-ups ** Accessible formats and communication supports are available upon request. If you require assistance to take part in a city meeting or event, please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 ** Heritage Kitchener Agenda Page 2 January 5, 2021 Information Items • Heritage Permit Application Tracking Sheet Dianna Saunderson Committee Administrator ** Accessible formats and communication supports are available upon request. If you require assistance to take part in a city meeting or event, please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 ** Staff Report ` Develo lnent5ervicesDepartr7ent www.kitchenerca REPORT TO: Heritage Kitchener DATE OF MEETING: January 5, 2021 SUBMITTED BY: Bustamante, Rosa - Director of Planning, 519-741-2200 ext. 7319 PREPARED BY: Grohn, Victoria — Heritage Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7041 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 1 DATE OF REPORT: December 22, 2020 REPORT NO.: DSD -21-001 SUBJECT: H PA -2021 -IV -001 38 Shirk Place Replacement of roof, replacement of windows, restoration of dormers, and construction of second storey rear addition RECOMMENDATION: That pursuant to Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Heritage Permit Application HPA-2021-IV-001 be approved to permit the replacement of the roof; replacement of windows; restoration of roof dormers; and construction of a second story rear addition on the property municipally addressed as 38 Shirk Place, in accordance with the plans and supplementary information submitted with the application and subject to the following condition: 1. That final building permit drawings be reviewed and heritage clearance provided by Heritage Planning staff prior to the issuance of a building permit. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: This report supports the delivery of core services. BACKGROUND: The Development Services Department is in receipt of Heritage Permit Application HPA- 2021-IV-001 which is seeking permission to replace the roof, replace the windows, restore the roof dormers, and construct a second storey rear addition on the property municipally addressed as 38 Shirk Place. REPORT: The subject property is located on the north side of Shirk Place, between Lancaster Street West and Woolwich Street in the Bridgeport West community. The dwelling was constructed *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. 1-1 c. 1840 as the residence of Jacob Shoemaker, one of the founders of the Village of Bridgeport. The property was designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act in 1984. Location Map: 38 Shirk Place Cultural Heritage Value or Interest Designation by-law 84-28 identifies the total exterior of the dwelling to be of architectural value and the following attributes to be of particular interest: • 12 over 12 and 8 over 12 paned windows-, • Transomed second storey doorway-, • Cornice mouldings-, • Six bay Georgian principle facade; and • Secondary facades that are triple brick laid in Flemish bond and covered by lightly lined stucco wash. The designating by-law goes on to identify the dwelling as a rare example of a substantial merchant's dwelling of 1840. i In Front elevation: 38 Shirk Place 1-2 Roof Replacement The applicant is proposing to replace the existing metal roof, which is damaged and is causing interior damage to the dwelling, with a new, black metal roof. The existing metal roof is not original, and the date of installation is unknown. The soffits, fascia, and frieze board will remain white to maintain the existing character of the dwelling, and the existing chimneys will remain. Proposed metal roof replacement Window Replacement The applicant advises that the windows and sills are all rotting and that these damaged exterior components are threatening the integrity of the dwelling. Existing windows and sills 1-3 The applicant proposes to replace all the existing wood windows and sills with vinyl windows to match existing. The goal of the window replacement program on this property is to ensure longevity of the dwelling while respecting and maintaining its historical integrity. The proposal calls for new vinyl windows and sills to mimic a wood pattern. The new windows will be the same style as the existing, with the same proportions and number of lites, and will be white in colour to match existing. The applicant also advises that the original windows will be stored on site for reference as needed. Replacement vinyl simulated divided lite windows for front and side facades have been approved in the past for other Part IV designated properties through the Heritage Permit Application process with success. Dormer Restoration The applicant is proposing to reintroduce three (3) dormers that have been lost over time. The dormers will be constructed in the same size, orientation, and style as shown in historical images. Historical Photo of 38 Shirk Place (Mennonite Archival Information Database) Designating by-law 84-28 does not reference the roof dormers as an attribute of the property and it is presumed that the dormers were removed prior to the designation of the property in 1984. The dormers are proposed to be constructed in a manner that is in keeping with historic photographs and be clad in black vertical board and batten siding to tie in with the proposed black metal roof. The windows on the dormers are proposed to match the profile and proportions of the windows on the existing dwelling. 1-4 IN I 0.1 ME.H.51. ME Mwiffink. Proposed dormers on front facade Second Storey Rear Addition The applicant is proposing a partial second storey rear addition. This addition will not be visible from the street right-of-way or from the front of the existing dwelling. The proposed addition is 660 square feet, incorporates a gable roof and is to be clad in grey, vinyl vertical board and batten siding. The roof ridge of the proposed addition will not exceed the height of the roof of the existing dwelling. Location of partial second storey rear addition 1-5 M Proposed partial second storey rear addition Heritage Planning Comments The proposed works meet the "Eight Guiding Principles in the Conservation of Historical Properties", especially: • Respect for documentary evidence —conservation work should be based on historical documentation, such as historic photographs, drawings, and physical evidence. • Legibility — new work should be distinguishable from old. • Maintenance — with continuous care, future restoration will not be necessary. The proposed works meet the following from Parks Canada's "The Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada". • Where character -defining elements are too severely deteriorated to repair and replacing in kind is not feasible, replace with material that is physically and visually compatible with the original. • Conserve the heritage value and character -defining elements when creating any new additions to a historic place or any related new construction. Make the new work physically and visually compatible with, subordinate to, and distinguishable from the historic place. • Replace missing features from the restoration period with new features whose forms, materials, and detailing are based on sufficient physical, documentary, and/or oral evidence. • Achieve compatibility with the insertion of a new element through form, material, and detailing, or through proportion, scale, or massing. In reviewing the merits of the application, Heritage Planning staff note the following: • The subject property is designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act; • The proposed new roof will have a neutral impact on the existing dwelling; • The new windows will be designed to match the existing; 1-6 • The partial second storey addition will not be visible from the front facade and is compatible with the existing dwelling; • The proposed dormers reintroduces a feature of the property that has been lost over time, is a neutral impact on the existing dwelling, and is sensitive to the existing building; • The goal of these projects is to increase longevity of the built heritage resource while maintaining the integrity of the historic place; and • The proposed works will not adversely affect the character of the existing dwelling. In accordance with the Heritage Permit Application form, the approval of an application under the Ontario Heritage Act shall not be a waiver of any of the provisions of any by-law of the City of Kitchener or legislation, including, but not limited to, the requirements of the Ontario Building Code and Zoning By-law. In this regard, staff confirm that a Building Permit is required to carry out this work. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: N/A COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the Heritage Kitchener committee meeting. CONSULT — Heritage Kitchener has been consulted regarding the subject Heritage Permit Application. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: • Ontario Heritage Act APPROVED BY: Justin Readman - General Manager, Development Services ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A — Heritage Permit Application HPA-2021-IV-001 1-7 1 HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION & SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS Planning Division — 200 King Street West, 6th Floor Ki L P.O. Box 1118, Kitchener ON N2G 4G7 aTENER 519-741-2426; planning(a�kitchener.ca STAFF USE ONLY Date Received: Accepted By: Application Number: H PA -2020 - PART B: HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION FORM 1. NATURE OF APPLICATION ® Exterior ❑ Interior ❑ Signage ❑ Demolition ® New Construction ❑ Alteration ❑ Relocation 2. SUBJECT PROPERTY Municipal Address: 38 Shirk PI., Kitchener, ON., N2K 1 R4 Legal Description (If know): PT LT 59 GERMAN COMPANY TRACT KITCHENER AS IN 450875 EXCEPTED FORCED RD; KITCHENER Building/Structure Type: x❑ Residential ❑ Commercial ❑ Industrial ❑ Institutional Heritage Designation: ® Part IV (Individual) ❑ Part V (Heritage Conservation District) Is the property subject to a Heritage Easement or Agreement? ❑ Yes x❑ No 3. PROPERTY OWNER Name: Address: City/Province/Postal Code: Phone: Email: 4. AGENT (if applicable) 10F=12 Company: Address: City/Provir Phone: Email: 2020 City of Kitchener — Heritage Permit Application & Submission Requirements 1Pa7 7 8 5. WRITTEN DESCRIPTION Provide a written description of the project including any conservation methods proposed. Provide such detail as materials to be used, measurements, paint colours, decorative details, whether any original building fabric is to be removed or replaced, etc. Use additional pages as required. Please refer to the City of Kitchener Heritage Permit Application Submission Guidelines for further direction. To restore three (3) previously existing dormers to the front of the home in the same size, orientation, and style as they can be seen in historical pictures (one of which has been provided as a reference point). Proposed cladding material will be black Gentek vinyl vertical board and batten siding to sheath the dormers' walls. Window measurements and design will mirror those on the upper floor of the structure (40"w x 60"h) with an 8 over 12 grill pattern. Soffit and fascia detail will also mirror that of the existing structure to the best of our ability and be white in colour. Roofing material will match whichever material is approved by Heritage Planning Division (Heritage Permit Application forrrooposed new roof is contained within this document)_ 6. REVIEW OF CITY OF KITCHENER HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMISSION GUIDELINES Describe why it is necessary to undertake the proposed work: This work is a necessary step in restoring the historically accurate facade to this magnificent building. At some point in time the dormers were removed but they represent an important time period design which we believe is crucial to re-establishing the building's historical roots in Kitchener. Describe how the proposal is consistent with the Part IV individual designating by-law or the Part V Heritage Conservation District Plan: The by-law makes no mention of the previously existing dormers as a relevant feature although we assume (considering the age of the existing roof and the date which the by-law was written) the dormers had been removed well before the by-law had been written. We don't presume to know whether or not there would in fact be historical significance to the restoration of said dormers but given our layperson understanding, we believe they would in fact help to better illustrate the Georgian style of the home. After a little digging, it is apparent that symmetrically situated dormers were a popular characteristic of Georgian homes built during the late 17 and early 18 hundreds. Describe how the proposal is consistent with Parks Canada's Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (www.historicplaces. ca/en/pages/standards-normes. aspx): We believe Standard 11 and Standard 12 best suit the proposed project as described in this permit application given the feature has been removed in its entirety at an earlier date, the option of repairing is rendered moot. As such, the reintroduction of the previously existing dormers shall be "physically and visually compatible with, subordinate to, and distinguishable from the historical place" in that the structures themselves will be visually compatible with classic Georgian -style architecture, while the board and batten siding will distinguish the proposed structures from the historic place itself. We believe our efforts strike an adequate and desirable balance between the objectives as outlined in Standard 11. Relating to Standard 12, given that the dormers had already been removed at an earlier date, we don't feel that re -introducing them now poses any risks to the home should they be removed again at a future date. 7. PROPOSED WORKS a) Expected start date: As soon as possible Expected completion date: As soon as possible b) Have you discussed this work with Heritage Planning Staff? 0 Yes ❑ No - If yes, who did you speak to? Victoria Grohn c) Have you discussed this work with Building Division Staff? - If yes, who did you speak to? d) Have you applied for a Building Permit for this work? e) Other related Building or Planning applications: ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ Yes 0 No Application number. N/A The undersigned acknowledges that all of the statements contained in documents filed in support of this application shall be deemed part of this application. The undersigned acknowledges that receipt of this application by the City of Kitchener - Planning Division does not guarantee it to be a `complete' application. The undersigned acknowledges that the Council of the City of Kitchener shall determine whether the information submitted forms a complete application. Further review of the application will be undertaken and the owner or agent may be contacted to provide additional information and/or resolve any discrepancies or issues with the application as submitted. Once the application is deemed to be fully complete, the application will be processed and, if necessary, scheduled for the next available Heritage Kitchener committee and Council meeting. Submission of this application constitutes consent for authorized municipal staff to enter upon the subject property for the purpose of conducting site visits, including taking photographs, which are 2020 City of Kitchener — Heritage Permit Application & Submission Requirements JPaM 8 9 necessary for the evaluation of this application. The undersigned acknowledges that where an agent has been identified, the municipality is authorized but not required to contact this person in lieu of the owner and this person is authorized to act on behalf of the owner for all matters respecting the application. The undersigned agrees that the proposed work shall be done in accordance with this application and understands that the approval of this application under the Ontario Heritage Act shall not be a waiver of any of the provisions of any by-law of the City of Kitchener or legislation including but not limited to the requirements of the Building Code and the Zoning By-law. The undersigned acknowledges that in the event this application is approved, any departure from the conditions imposed by the Council of the City of Kitchener or from the plans or specifications approved by the Council of the City of Kitchener is prohibited and could result in a fine being imposed oyuTrprisoone A as provided for under the Ontario Heritage Act. Signature of Owner/, Signature of Owner/. 6. AUTHORIZATION 10/19/2020 10/19/2020 If this application is being made by an agent on behalf of the property owner, the following authorization must be completed: OL 0 Ar M I /We, the land that is subject of this application, hereby authorize to act on my / our behalf in this regard. Signature of Owner/A Signature of Owner/ The personal information on this form is collected under the legal authority of Section 33(2), Section 42(2), and Section 42(2.2) of the Ontario Heritage Act. The information will be used for the purposes of administering the Heritage Permit Application and ensuring appropriate service of notice of receipt under Section 33(3) and Section 42(3) of the Ontario Heritage Act. If you have any questions about this collection of personal information, please contact the Manager of Corporate Records, Legislated Services Division, City of Kitchener (519-741-2769). STAFF USE ONLY Application Number: Application Received: Application Complete: Notice of Receipt: Notice of Decision: 90 -Day Expiry Date: PROCESS: ❑ Heritage Planning Staff: ❑ Heritage Kitchener: ❑ Council: **Please See Attached Pages for work descriptions 2020 City of Kitchener — Heritage Permit Application & Submission Requirements 1-10 Proposed Work: Roof Replacement Provide a written description of the project including any conservation methods proposed. Provide such detail as materials to be used, measurements, paint colours, decorative details, whether any original building fabric is to be removed or replaced, etc. Use additional pages as required. Please refer to the City of Kitchener Heritage Permit Application Submission Guidelines for further direction. Removal of existing metal roof as it is severely damaged and water damage is evident inside the home. Replace with new black metal roof. Preferred style of new roof can be visualized using the attached photos as a reference. Existing chimneys will be left in their current state. The proposed colour of the new material is black (colour swatch has been provided as well). No original roofing materials will be removed as they have long since been replaced. The dimensions will remain the same as there are no structural changes proposed herein. 6. REVIEW OF CITY OF KITCHENER HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMISSION GUIDELINES Describe why it is necessary to undertake the proposed work: The removal and replacement of the existing roof is necessary given its current state of disrepair. The objective of replacing the roof is to ensure the life of this property is extended and to prevent any further damage due to water. Furthermore, the existing roof is not original and does not adequately represent the appropriate aesthetic for the age of the home. Describe how the proposal is consistent with the Part IV individual designating by-law or the Part V Heritage Conservation District Plan: There is no mention of the roof material in the designated by-law associated with the property. We believe that repairing the severely damaged roof may not positively or negatively impact the historical significance of the property but rather ensure its distinguishing features are preserved and maintained for generations to come. We have tried to select a style and material which will not detract from the Georgian design of the home. Any guidance regarding acceptable colours to better align with the objectives of preserving the heritage site are welcomed and encouraged. We do have some preferences as outlined above, hopefully one, some, or all are determined to be acceptable. Describe how the proposal is consistent with Parks Canada's Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (www.historicplaces. ca/en/pages/standards-normes. aspx): It is unclear which standards are applicable to the replacement of the roof as it is not original, no considerable changes to the roof line or size are proposed, and we aren't entirely aware of how best to reconstitute period roofing materials to perform the repair necessary to preserve this home. It should be noted in Standard 11, "New materials and assemblies should also have compatible service lives or durability, so that maintenance and repair work can be undertaken concurrently. Not doing so can lead to prematurely replacing adjacent historic materials for the sake of efficiency." which we feel encompasses our desire to install a steel roof for its durability. 7. PROPOSED WORKS a) Expected start date: As soon as possible Expected completion date: as soon as possible b) Have you discussed this work with Heritage Planning Staff? 0 Yes ❑ No - If yes, who did you speak to? Victoria Grohn c) Have you discussed this work with Building Division Staff? - If yes, who did you speak to? d) Have you applied for a Building Permit for this work? e) Other related Building or Planning applications: ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes 0 No Application number. N/A 2020 City of Kitchener — Heritage Permit Application & Submission Requirements 1 ?agi I Proposed Work: Window/Sill Replacement Provide a written description of the project including any conservation methods proposed. Provide such detail as materials to be used, measurements, paint colours, decorative details, whether any original building fabric is to be removed or replaced, etc. Use additional pages as required. Please refer to the City of Kitchener Heritage Permit Application Submission Guidelines for further direction. To remove and replace existing damaged all wooden windows and sills. New windows will have interior grills to mimic the existing window design. Windows will be made of vinyl that has been treated to mimic the appearance of wood to better maintain the historical aesthetic of the home. All window openings will be maintained exactly as they are now so window dimensions will remain the same. Window, caulking, and detail will all be white to match the original style of the windows. Original windows will be stored on site for future reference should it be required. Window grill size and orientation will be matched to the existing windows. A photo has been provided by the window company although it does not reflect the actual style or size of the proposed windows or associated window grills for the project as they are so unique; simply provided as a reference for colour more than anything. 6. REVIEW OF CITY OF KITCHENER HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMISSION GUIDELINES Describe why it is necessary to undertake the proposed work: The work is necessary to ensure the longevity of the structure is protected. The windows are all rotting along with the sills they sit on which poses a safety risk to those residing at the home as well as to the home itself. Our goal is to ensure this property lasts for many years to come; a major component to that objective is the updating of dilapidated and damaged exterior components which threaten the integrity of the structure as a whole if not addressed. The windows undoubtedly fall under the category of severely damaged exterior components. Describe how the proposal is consistent with the Part IV individual designating by-law or the Part V Heritage Conservation District Plan: The designated by-law makes reference to the significance of the windows as such:, "...significant details including "some 12 over 12" and 8" over 12" paned windows", which we propose to mirror exactly in the proposed new window design. Admittedly, a picture clearly illustrating the proposed design is not readily available as it it highly unusual but we have been adamant that the window grills themselves must exactly imitate the existing window grill design. We believe the replacement of the existing windows is an integral component to maintaining the structural integrity of the building while simultaneously believing that respecting the historical significance of the window design must be maintained. The by-law also makes note of the orientation of the windows in relation to the facade of the home; none of the window locations are movin in this proposal. Describe how the proposal is consistent with Parks Canada's Standards an Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (www.historicplaces. ca/en/pages/standards-normes. aspxx): Standard 1 makes reference to, "do not ... alter its intact of repairable c arac er- a ening elements", the windows in question are neii� in act" nor repairable; the same can be said of the sills they rest on which are such disrepair to actually begin damaging the brick beneath. Standard 3 delineates between the acts of Preservation, Rehabilitation, and Restoration; our proposal hopes to Preserve the integrity of the structure over the fruitless efforts of rehabilitating or restoring windows which should have realistically been replaced or repaired decade ago. As for Standard 5, our proposal assumes the continued use of the home in its current form. CONTINUED ON LAST PAGE 7. PROPOSED WORKS a) Expected start date: As soon as possible Expected completion date: As soon as possible b) Have you discussed this work with Heritage Planning Staff? x❑ Yes ❑ No - If yes, who did you speak to? Victoria Grohn c) Have you discussed this work with Building Division Staff? ❑ Yes ® No - If yes, who did you speak to? d) Have you applied for a Building Permit for this work? ❑ Yes x❑ No e) Other related Building or Planning applications: Application number. 2020 City of Kitchener — Heritage Permit Application & Submission Requirements 1 ?ag12 Standard 7 brings into question the degree of intervention required and which authoritative figures have provided that assessment. I have been working in construction for over a decade, my business mentor has been building custom homes in the Region for 35 years, the multitude of industry professionals that have toured the property with me since we took possession, and the various window companies that have walked through the home are all in agreement that the existing windows are in abysmal shape and threaten to erode the integrity of the home. Of the five (5) window companies we asked to review our project, none were prepared to engage in any type of restoration projection citing cost constraints as well as overall feasibility given the degree of degradation already present in the existing windows/sills themselves. Standard 8 is a step which has been sorely lacking regarding the windows at 38 Shirk Pl. Part (a) references the need for ongoing maintenance which is no longer a viable option as painting over rotten wood does nothing to resolve the issues as they exist today. Part (b) urges parties to employ the use of time -tested and proven techniques/materials and from experience, I along with all of my colleagues are always quick to recommend new windows for the majority of our projects, particularly when wood windows are involved simply due to the inferior nature of the material and the propensity for deterioration when exposed to the Canadian climate. Part (c) suggests that if the windows are of importance but need to be replaced then they should be replaced "in kind". However, subsequently within Standard 8 it notes, "Replacement in kind may sometimes be difficult, and substitute materials may be necessary when the original materials are damaging to character - defining elements or hazardous to public health. Some mid -20th century materials are no longer made or cannot be manufactured in small batches. In a place where the heritage value depends on a material that is no longer available, the ongoing loss of the material will eventually lead to a difficult choice: accepting breakage or replacing the entire material or assembly with one that is physically and visually compatible with the original", which absolutely applies to the matter of the existing windows at 38 Shirk Pl. The goal is to use a superior material which is also "physically and visually compatible with the original" to ensure the long term integrity of the home is maintained. Standard 9 Part (a) reads, "...balancing the need for an intervention to be appropriate in physical and visual terms and subtly distinguishable. Compatibility can allow for some variation in the finish or patina, which will serve as the distinguishing factor. Generally, repair and replacement work only needs to be identifiable on close inspection. However, honesty requires that new work be clearly distinguishable from the old by subtle visual means or by date stamping in inconspicuous locations." The proposed new window design will be visually similar to the existing windows in shape, size, grill -orientation, colour, and position on the home while being constructed out of a superior material, thus providing the subtle distinguishing feature discussed above. Further, all new windows are date-stamped inside the walls of their frame, providing the "date stamping in inconspicuous locations" mentioned above. Part (b) makes reference to the need to document any changes to better facilitate repairs moving forward. It's unclear how relevant this subsection is but the removed windows will be stored on site for future reference and general maintenance will be performed on the windows as it is required. Standard 10 again addresses the importance of trying to salvage any and all character -defining elements when feasible. For fear of repetition, I will simply again reiterate the serious state of disrepair the current windows and sills are currently in. Attempts at repairing the windows are not an option (based on the feedback from the window companies we've communicated with thus far) and therefore Part (b) of this standard appears most relevant wherein the distinguishing features of the windows themselves are maintained which is our intent. Replacing the existing windows with windows which are visually similar to the existing windows in shape, size, grill -orientation, colour, and position on the home should suffice in maintaining the noted significance as outlined in the by-law. 1-13 Proposed Work: Addition for Rear Structure Written Description: To erect a partial second story on the right -rear structure of 38 Shirk PI. The addition would see full 8' walls erected on the left side of the second floor of the existing yellow brick rear addition on the property (as indicated in the elevation drawing provided). The addition would be constructed following modern Ontario Building Code materials and standards i.e. lumber, vapour barrier, appropriate R - Value insulation, etc. A gabled roof design will be used to mirror the existing structures. This addition would not be visible from the street nor would it be visible from the front of the home. There is no work being done to the property which affects the Heritage Attributes outlined in the Designating Bylaw for 38 Shirk PI. Windows: The proposed windows would mirror those outlined previously within this application with appropriate symmetrical grill patterns. They would be vinyl frame, interior grill, SDL cross member to delineate between upper and lower panes, and white in colour. Soffit: Soffit would be black, vented aluminum to ensure longevity of the material and adequate venting for roof longevity. Material specifications and installation guidelines can be located in the Gentek Brochure attached in this application. Frieze Board: Frieze board would be comprised of a square stepped detail to replicate the aesthetic detail found elsewhere on the home and be capped in black aluminum flashing to ensure longevity of the project. A picture of the intended profile for the Frieze Board can be located in this application. Material specifications and installation guidelines can be located in the Gentek Brochure attached in this application. Fascia: Fascia would be standard 2x6 capped in black aluminum flashing to ensure longevity of the project. Material specifications and installation guidelines can be located in the Gentek Brochure attached in this application. Eaves/Downspouts: Eaves would be black, 4", custom moulded aluminum while the downspouts would be black, custom moulded standard size. Material specifications can be located in the photo labelled "Metal Rain Water Systems" attached in this application. Roofing Material: Roofing material will match the proposed roofing material outlined previously in this application i.e. steel roof. Roofing material colour and specifications can be located in the photos attached to this application. Siding: Siding material proposed will be Chesapeake Grey (colour), vinyl vertical board and batten to replicate historical siding methods present at the time the home was constructed while ensuring the building materials will improve the viable lifetime of the product itself, and the home as a result. Colour pallet and relevant material specifications can be found in the Siding Gentek Brochure attached to this application. Description of Necessity of Work This project is a necessary step in improving the liveability of this unit. In its current form, the unit does not allow for adequate living space on the main floor while ensuring all necessary components of a home are present. The mindset then is to accommodate for those required living features in the attic but ceiling heights are well below the necessary minimums for living space. This leaves the option of increasing the ceiling height above, thus allowing for the necessary features to be installed within the home. The goal for this unit is to ensure comfort, longevity, and appropriate aesthetics are established for many years and generations to come. Consistency with Designating Bylaw There is no specific reference to any important Heritage discerning features that influence this proposed new construction within the designating bylaw with the exception of the windows. However, the existing windows in the yellow brick addition do not reflect those detailed in the designating bylaw. We would like to update the windows in question with those that mirror the ones referenced in the designating bylaw (8 over 12, 12 over 12, or 6 over 6 pane style, depending on window openings). This should ensure that consistency with the window styles is in accordance with historical relevance. It will also ensure consistency in the window design in relation to the rest of the home. Standards and Guidelines As per our discussion with Victoria Grohn, please review previously referenced Standards in relation to our proposed new construction outlined above. 1-15 i ir.xicrina rsrirw .%Y riirrl a� 16 X91 V� U O G4 -�u 1-17 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIII .. IIIIIIIIIIIIII 111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIII . - 1111 lilil � . _ ilil �lili lili lilil ilii IIIII■-■-■-■-■-■-■-■-■-■-r�. IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII$IIIIIII . IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIl�-.11lllll 111111111111111111111111111111 � � �� 111111 � 1111 .. I 1 i■1111111 � IIIIIIII IIIII �:IIIIIII �� 11111111 IIII■�■�IIIIII III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII11IIIIII��`Illl11 low 11111111111111111111111111111�.IIIIIII 1111111111111111111111111111111.;1 I I I I I I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII i �� 111111111.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1. 11111111 -� IIIIIIII 11111111 �i� IIIIIIII^ lilililili � �_ 11111111. X111111111 � IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 111111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111111111111111 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1■1■1■1■1. -18 Fascia, Soffit, Frieze Board Colour Palette (Black) Colour Palette Bright Rainware Ice Whlte Sandstone Cashmere Almond Maize Wicker Canyon Clay Pebble White White ins will Sandalwood Monterey Brownstone Dark Drltt Sable Dover Gray Metallic storm Chesapeake Slate Sand Gray Gray INN ge Meadow Moonlit Ivy Green Forest Rockwell Wedgewood Midnight Slate Smoke Fern Moss Green Blue Blue Surf Coastal Marine Old Wortd AluCopper Bright Red Majestic Nutmeg Chestnut Commercial Rockport Blue Dusk Blue Brick Brown Brown Brown Espresso Smoked Graphite Iron fire Black Timber Not J products and oorours are available at aM ronlions; see your Gentek representalive for detaJe. 1-19 Frieze Board Detail Shingle str F ai 1-20 Never Needs to be Painted High-performance WHAT'S IN A COLOUR? EVERYTHING. vinyl colour won't chip, flake or peel. From cool neutral palettes to bold contrasting hues, colour defines the design. Gentek siding is Easy Upkeep Rinse occasionally with a garden available in a grand scale of colours that lets you tailor the look of your home with signature style. hose to refresh the appearance. Classic Colours Durable and Dent -Resistant Stands up strong to dings and abrasions, and won't rot or warp due Snow white Wicker Dover Gray LO moisture. Custom Appeal Decorative accents, corner posts, Sandstone trim and other accessories will give your home a style all its own. Linen Valuable Investment Creating a beautiful, low -maintenance exterior can greatly enhance the Almond value of your home. Lifetime Limited Warranty Backed Maize by a lifetime limited, transferable warranty including fade and hail Designer Coloursfi protection; see warranty for details. Featuring richer, darker colours fortified with ChromaTrue° fade -defying technology, Board & Batten vinyl siding carries a lifetime limited warranty against fading. See printed warranty for complete details. Rockport Brown Chremaftue° Variegated Colours Tesigner Colours not available in all markets. Canyon Clay Storm Pebble Chesapeake Gray Monterey Sand Sage Pearl Juniper Grove 1-21 7" Vertical Board & Batten QUICK SPECS: Nominal Thickness: .048" Windload: Laboratory tested to withstand windloads up to 180 km/h (112 mph) Texture: Light Roughsawn COLOUR MATCHING MADE SIMPLE No need to settle for siding and trim that "almost match." Our Colour Clear Through° collection of customer -preferred colours ensures that all Gentek products — siding, soffit, fascia, trim and rainware — will beautifully match throughout our vinyl, aluminum and steel product lines. co�ourr CLEAR THROUGH' fit .rlit Siding in Iron Ore with Linen trim and Crushed Ledgestone accent. DESIGN AND DECIDE Whether you want to just refresh or press the reset button — one of the most difficult aspects of home remodeling is choosing colours. How will the new products and colours look on your home? The Gentek Visualizer takes the guesswork out of the design process. This easy web -based design tool lets you instantly create a variety of exterior designs with options for siding, trim, roofing, front door paint, exterior window colours and more. • Design -ready with a gallery of house images; access it from any device and start designing • Custom "photo -realistic" option — upload a photo of your home and simply outline the roof and walls and apply products to the photo (our design team also can professionally prep the photo for you) • Pre -selected Gentek product and colour combinations for easy design selection • Save your preferred products, colours and designs — everything is listed and ready to go FREE DESIGN ADVICE — JUST FOLLOW THE BLDG Tap into this valuable remodeling and design resource. Just follow our MyDesign Home Studio blog at mydesignhomestudio.com to enjoy a wide range of design tips and renovation ideas, as well as a question and answer portal offering professional design advice for any project. 1-23 = 0 LO # § n - 2 ===m _ u o _£ R / 0§ a \ / a E ru c m § 3 = E E0 _ � � o c— u = 5 f % 2 / cEC�3 E� m. u o \ � m 0 ° I " U) k / k @ u I cn ± CD CD k M-C ° = o m ) \ _ _ _ (13 LD E 6$ S W w _ --z2c 2= q m2 \ k § c \ E 1-23 Historical Photo Reference: Dormers _ �.,C� ,� ,,�•�-�f •. •.., .fit-. �'•�+� y.' 1-25 Window Examples from Manufacturer ** Grill design not indicative of anticipated size, style or pattern. Pattern/style of grills has been illustrated below. Page 4 QF 6 1-26 6 Over 6 Window Grill Pattern 1-27 12 Over 12 Window Grill Pattern 1-28 8 Over 12 Window Grill Pattern 1-29 Proposed Roof Material 1-31 � G � \ C\j \ F co 6 _ w 7 E f , co # o E E % /N # o E e E e q / 2 , E E ® n P E > / E o E [ / o E E 2 2 m 2 E 2 E f d 2 \ § in � 0 \ \ / a k / I O O 2 3 1-32 e o $/2 (\k =E® \ § 7 \ k = 9 a % & G g > _> \ 2 g 5 @ 7 = I }-) S \ _ =$G2 / \ 0 5 ca CL 0 Q g 3 E / o_ -- � \/- ®\§ j2 -° /\k\ 1-32 �- 7 ;� 4WK� Will -7 1w 'PAW 1-34 Aw Atv kV ' - t OWN. "b J � 'It- . ♦ \aa 1-35 e O 1 y. tea, s"YA :u.� $°- '•, c RAW s h x w a ae�•. �s i - 'illi J�V�_ II i 111 MM IT Ir _ 1 ' 11_111 L a �I ■ 1 _ diel 9 MIME -0 ;•, jp{ Staff Report ` Develo lnent5ervicesDepartr7ent www.kitchenerca REPORT TO: Heritage Kitchener DATE OF MEETING: January 5, 2021 SUBMITTED BY: Bustamante, Rosa - Director of Planning, 519-741-2200 ext. 7319 PREPARED BY: Grohn, Victoria — Heritage Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7041 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 10 DATE OF REPORT: December 22, 2020 REPORT NO.: DSD -21-002 SUBJECT: H PA -2021-V-002 & H PA -2021-V-003 172 Queen Street North Demolition of detached garage and construction of detached garage RECOMMENDATION: That pursuant to Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Heritage Permit Application HPA-2021-V-002 be approved to permit the demolition of an existing detached garage on the property municipally addressed as 172 Queen Street North; and fu rther, That pursuant to Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Heritage Permit Application H PA -2021 -V-003 be approved to permit the construction of a detached garage on the property municipally addressed as 172 Queen Street North, in accordance with the plans and supplementary information submitted with the application, and subject to the following condition: 1. That final building permit drawings be reviewed and heritage clearance provided by Heritage Planning staff prior to the issuance of a building permit. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: This report supports the delivery of core services. BACKGROUND: The Development Services Department is in receipt of Heritage Permit Applications HPA- 2021-V-002 and HPA-2021-V-003 which are seeking permission to demolish an existing detached garage and construct a detached garage on the property municipally addressed as 172 Queen Street North, located within the Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District. *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. 2-1 REPORT: The subject property is located on the west side of Queen Street North between Lancaster Street East and St Leger Street in the Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District (CCNHCD). The subject property is designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act and identified as a Group `B' property within the CCNHCD Plan. ' � 3,1 1866 304 1 b 247 r � m \ a t7s174 las m A0 29 �rye' // � 14 �� % ,79� � v „f Location Map: 172 Queen Street North The CCNHCD Plan describes the dwelling on the subject property as a c. 1927, 2 storey dwelling constructed in the Vernacular architectural style. The Plan also references this property as part of the CCNHCD Walking Tour and notes that the dwelling was built for M. H. Stroh, a contractor and real estate agent, and that the design employs some Tudor details including a roof shape reminiscent of thatched roofs of Tudor England. The detached garage is not mentioned in the CCNHCD Plan description. 2-2 172 Queen Street North — Front Elevation & Detached Garage Proposed Demolition In accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, a heritage permit is required from the Council of a municipality to demolish a building or structure on a designated heritage property. This includes the demolition of an accessory structure, and Heritage Kitchener must be consulted. 172 Queen Street North — Side elevation of existing detached garage Generally, the CCNHCD Plan policies and guidelines pertain to residential dwellings and give little guidance on accessory structures. However, the CCNHCD Plan contains five policies relating to demolition. In general, the policies indicate: demolition of buildings is strong discouraged; demolition requires a Heritage Permit Application; documentation outlining appropriate reasons for demolition is required; approved demolitions may be conditional on the submission of written and/or photographic documentation of notable architectural features and construction techniques; and reclamation of building materials for reuse on site or in the neighbourhood is strongly encouraged. Application HPA-2021-V-002 seeks permission to demolish the existing detached garage. The exact construction date of the detached garage is unknown. Based on photographs and a written description provided by the applicant, the soffits and fascia are damaged, the particle board is delaminating as a result of water damage, the holes in the structure have been poorly patched, and the cladding is crumbling. In addition, the overhead door does not fit properly and does not lock, and the side door does not open, the framing has shifted, and appears that the door has been sealed by boards nailed in place. 2-3 Rv if' T5 1 .r Damage to soffits and fascia Poorly patched hole Crumbling interior and water damage 2-4 Overhead and side doors Proposed New Construction Section 3.3.3 of the CCNHCD Plan provides policy direction with respect to new construction within the CCNHCD: a) New buildings will respect and be compatible with the heritage character of the Civic Centre Neighbourhood through attention to height, built form, setbacks, massing, material, and other architectural elements such as doors, windows, rooflines; and b) Design guidelines provided in section 6.6 of the CCNHCD Plan will be used to review and evaluate proposals for new buildings to ensure that new development is compatible with the adjacent context. Generally, the policies contained in section 3.3.3 of the CCNHCD Plan pertain to new residential and commercial construction and provide little guidance on accessory structures. However, the guidelines contained in section 6.6 of the CCNHCD Plan can be used for the design of accessory structures within the district. The following summarizes the relevant recommended practices and design guidelines for new construction: • Match setback, footprint, size and massing patterns of the neighbourhood, particularly to the immediately adjacent neighbours; • Use roof shapes and major design elements that are complementary to surrounding buildings and heritage patterns; • Use materials and colours that represent the texture and palette of the Civic Centre Neighbourhood; and • Front drive garages are strongly discouraged. Garages should be located in the rear yard whenever possible and will be subject to the design guidelines of the HCD Plan. Application HPA-2021-V-003 seeks permission to construct a detached garage. The proposed detached garage is approximately 32 square metres, clad in dark wood siding to complement the dark brick of the existing dwelling. The overhead door and window on the 2-5 proposed detached garage are designed to incorporate features of the existing dwelling and characteristics of the surrounding district. Proposed detached garage Heritage Planning Staff Comments Heritage Planning staff are of the opinion that the design of the new detached garage, particularly relative to its height, built form, setback and massing is appropriate and compatible with the existing dwelling, neighbouring properties, and streetscape. In reviewing the merits of the applications, Heritage Planning staff note the following: • The property is a Group `B' property within the CCNHCD; • The applicant has demonstrated that the existing detached garage is in poor condition and would require significant investment to remedy; • The demolition of the existing detached garage will not detract from the character of the CCNHCD or the integrity of the Queen Street North streetscape; • The proposed detached garage addresses the CCNHCD Plan guidelines for new construction as follows: o Match setback, footprint, size and massing patterns of the neighbourhood, particularly to the immediately adjacent neighbours: ■ The proposed detached garage will maintain the orientation and setback of the existing detached garage and will be in line with the neighbouring detached garage; o Use roof shapes and major design elements that are complementary to surrounding buildings and heritage patterns: ■ The roof shape proposed contains a shallow slope, not unlike the roof over the porch on the principal dwelling, and is representative of the mix of roof shapes present on accessory buildings within the CCNHCD; the colour palette, materials, and fenestration proposed are complementary to surrounding buildings and heritage patterns within the district; o Use materials and colours that represent the texture and palette of the Civic Centre Neighbourhood: 2-6 - ■■■ MEMO �- ■■E■NEEM -- --__ _-=�=__ ■■■ — __—■■■MEN _= _- loom - — — — — 01 - - •------ •--------E Proposed detached garage Heritage Planning Staff Comments Heritage Planning staff are of the opinion that the design of the new detached garage, particularly relative to its height, built form, setback and massing is appropriate and compatible with the existing dwelling, neighbouring properties, and streetscape. In reviewing the merits of the applications, Heritage Planning staff note the following: • The property is a Group `B' property within the CCNHCD; • The applicant has demonstrated that the existing detached garage is in poor condition and would require significant investment to remedy; • The demolition of the existing detached garage will not detract from the character of the CCNHCD or the integrity of the Queen Street North streetscape; • The proposed detached garage addresses the CCNHCD Plan guidelines for new construction as follows: o Match setback, footprint, size and massing patterns of the neighbourhood, particularly to the immediately adjacent neighbours: ■ The proposed detached garage will maintain the orientation and setback of the existing detached garage and will be in line with the neighbouring detached garage; o Use roof shapes and major design elements that are complementary to surrounding buildings and heritage patterns: ■ The roof shape proposed contains a shallow slope, not unlike the roof over the porch on the principal dwelling, and is representative of the mix of roof shapes present on accessory buildings within the CCNHCD; the colour palette, materials, and fenestration proposed are complementary to surrounding buildings and heritage patterns within the district; o Use materials and colours that represent the texture and palette of the Civic Centre Neighbourhood: 2-6 ■ The proposed detached garage is proposed to be clad in dark wood siding and will be compatible with, yet subordinate to, the existing dwelling, and o Front drive garages are strongly discouraged. Garages should be located in the rear yard whenever possible and will be subject to the design guidelines of the HCD Plan: ■ The proposed detached garage is located in the rear yard and considers the design guidelines contained within the CCNHCD Plan. In accordance with the Heritage Permit Application form, the approval of any application under the Ontario Heritage Act shall not be a waiver of any of the provisions of any by-law of the City of Kitchener or legislation, including but not limited to, the requirements of the Ontario Building Code and Zoning By-law. In this regard, staff confirm that a Building Permit is required to demolish the existing detached garage and to construct a new detached garage. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: N/A COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the Heritage Kitchener committee meeting. CONSULT — Heritage Kitchener has been consulted regarding the subject Heritage Permit Applications. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: • Ontario Heritage Act • Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District Plan APPROVED BY: Justin Readman - General Manager, Development Services ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A — Heritage Permit Application HPA-2021-V-002 Attachment B — Heritage Permit Application H PA -2021 -V-003 2-% HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION & SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS Planning Division — 200 King Street West, 6t' Floor RTCHP.O. Box 1118, Kitchener ON N2G 4G7 MET�-ER 519-741-2426; planning(cDkitchener.ca STAFF USE ONLY Date Received: Accepted By: Application Number: HPA-2020- Len i •z I &I a IT, 1. NATURE OF APPLICATION El Exterior r-1 interior El Signage E(Demolition R New Construction El Alteration ❑ Relocation 2. SUBJECT PROPERTY Municipal Address: I --7A QveeA Siree+ Moz+�, J(Jc,e,4,;rfr Legal Description (if know): Building/Structure Type: know)_: El Commercial r-1 Industrial ❑ Institutional Heritage Designation: ❑ Part IV (individual) dpart V (Heritage Conservation District) Is the property subject to a Heritage Easement or Agreement? R Yes R(No Name: Address: il*R dsL:,r-V- City/Pi Phone Email: 4. AGENT (if applicable) Name: Company: Address: City/Province/Postal Code: Phone: Email: 2020 City of Kitchener— Heritage Pen -nit Application & Submission Requirements 2PM, 7& 5~ WRITTEN DESCRIPTION Provide @ written description Ufthe project including any conservation methods proposed.Provide such detail GS materials to be used, 00S@SU[8008Dts' paint colours, deCOr@tk/8 deL8i|S' whether any original building fabric is to be n8Dlov8d or replaced, etc. Use additional pages 88 required. P|8GSe refer to the City of Kitchener Heritage Permit Application 8UbO0iSSiVn Guidelines for further direction. 6. REVIEW OF CITY OF KITCHENER HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMISSION GUIDELINES Describe VVhyitiSOeC8mS8rytOundertake the proposed work: Describe how the proposal is consistent with the Part IV individual designating by-law or the Part V Heritage Conservation District Plan: (�,� �� i^ Describe how the proposal iaconsistent with Parks Canada's Standards and Guidelines for the 7. PROPOSED WORKS �Kck+ nJ Expected start 7^J/ Expected completion date: b\ H(��Udis�s��iS��v�H8h�e�aDDiD0�� UNo -|fyea.vvhodidyVuSpeok c) Have you discussed this work with Building Division Staff? E] Yes No -Ifyao.whodkjyousoemk d) Have you applied for Building Permit for this VVo[h? dyes LJ NO e) Other related Building or Planning applications: Application number 12 2, / '06 The UDd8[SigO8d acknowledges that all of the St8t8[DeDtS CODtGiD8d in d0cUDleO[S filed in support of this application shall be d88008d part of this ap[diC@UOD. The undersigned @ChDUVVedg8S that receipt of this application by the City Of NKCheOgr - Planning Division does not guarantee it to be @ 'complete' application. The undersigned 8CkDOVV|edg88 that the C0UOCi| of the City Of Kitchener Sh@|| determine whether the information submitted forms a complete application. Further review of the application will be undertaken and the owner O[agent may becontacted t0provide additional information and/or resolve any discrepancies or issues with the application @Ssubmitted. Once the application iSdeemed tOb8fully complete, the application will be processed and, if n8C8SS@ry' scheduled for the next 3V@i|8b|g Heritage Kitchener COnlDli#ee and Council meeting. Submission of this application constitutes consent for authorized OQuDiCip@| staff to enter upon the subject property for the purpose of conducting Site visits, including taking photographs' which are � _ N� 2020 Q�ofK�chmnm,-H�dagePennhAppio�mSubmission ��gn�o�� necessary for the evaluation of this application. The undersigned acknowledges that where an agent has been identified, the municipality is authorized but not required to contact this person in lieu of the owner and this person is authorized to act on behalf of the owner for all matters respecting the application. The undersigned agrees that the proposed work shall be done in accordance with this application and understands that the approval of this application under the Ontario Heritage Act shall not be a waiver of any of the provisions of any by-law of the City of Kitchener or legislation including but not limited to the requirements of the Building Code and the Zoning By-law. The undersigned acknowledges that in the event this application is approved, any departure from the conditions imposed by the Council of the City of Kitchener or from the plans or specifications approved by the Council of the City of Kitchener is prohibited and could result in a fine being imposed or i ri nment as provided for under the Ontario Heritage Act. Signature of Owner/Agent: VN967 Date: V- // — 'wao Signature of Owner/Agent:_ , Date: 6. AUTHORIZATION If this application is being made by an agent on behalf of the property owner, the following authorization must be completed: I/We, hereby authorize Signature of Owner/Agent: owner of the land that is subject of this application, Date: Signature of Owner/Agent: Date: to act on my / our behalf in this regard. The personal information on this form is collected under the legal authority of Section 33(2), Section 42(2), and Section 42(2.2) of the Ontario Heritage Act. The information will be used for the purposes of administering the Heritage Permit Application and ensuring appropriate service of notice of receipt under Section 33(3) and Section 42(3) of the Ontario Heritage Act. if you have any questions about this collection of personal information, please contact the Manager of Corporate Records, Legislated Services Division, City of Kitchener (519-741-2769). STAFF USE ONLY Application Number: Application Received: Application Complete: Notice of Receipt: Notice of Decision: 90 -Day Expiry Date: D Heritage Planning Staff: El Heritage Kitchener: 10_06� 2020 City of Kitchener — Heritage Permit Application & Submission Requirements 2 -PaIG 172 Queen Street — Garage demolition and rebuild It is unfortunate that the existing structure has fallen into such poor repair, due to lack of attention from previous owners. It is also noted that the original constructions (roofing in particular) and in the presumed modifications (rear end) of the garage were not completed in line with current standards. In terms of conforming with heritage conservation standards, the following considerations in design and aesthetic of the new structure have been made in order to stimulate the overall character of the new building and to pay respect to the Civic Centre District of Kitchener; - Position of Garage on the property is behind the house, and new build shall maintain the current position, orientation and set -back, as per conservation district plan preferences. The garage is only visible from the road when looking directly down the driveway - Garage Door, the prominent feature of the visible face, shall be carriage house style to add 1920 era character to the garage. Note that the current door is white panel, builder grade, and is not visually appealing. The current door does not fit the low opening in the structure properly. Nor does it close properly and leaves a large opening to the outside air. - The windows in the new structure shall have grills, to match the windows in the house, a popular 1920's visual feature on windows. The current structure has no windows. - The sides of the garage shall have vertical divisions to the facia, please refer to the drawings. This aesthetic feature is present on the current structure and shall be mimicked on the new build, in order to avoid having a large, bland uninterrupted and uninteresting surface. - The slope of the proposed garage roof is such that it is similar to the slope of the roof over the front porch of the house, and that of the slope of the roof on the dormer on the house, so that there is some consistency on the property. o Note that the peak has been offset such that the large surface is south -facing so that installation of solar panels can be considered in the future. - Light fixtures either side of doors and windows shall be a style that compliments features of the house on the property - Parging around the base of the new structure is to match as best possible the parging around the base of the existing house - New building cladding or siding material is preferred to be dark wooden or wood aesthetic, to compliment the dark brick of the house. It is not to be white vinyl or any similarly unattractive material. The house on the property, unfortunately, does not have some of the exterior character elements of many houses in the district, such as the corbels and detailed wood work around the soffits, etc. However, by considering the above, the new garage build can incorporate some character elements to the property where it is currently lacking. 2-11 2 -12 OO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ln Ln O O O O Ln O O O O O O O O LA ,:3, Ln Ln O O Ql N Ln Ln O Ln O O N Ln M c -I c -I c -I c -I N c -I N c -I c -I c -I n ri t/? t/? t/? t/? t/ t/? t/? t/? t/? t/? t/? t/? t/? t/? t/? if). O OO O O O O O H uS LA O kl O LA O LA LA ri r -I M N M M ri r -I tA• tA• tA• tA• tA• tA• tA• tA• CLO U C N U L O V O m Q ISS L } � L L O Q) C CLO C C O N u N L1 •O L U CLOO 76 L N V) Iti U\ OJ O L 'a Iti 'L 'a -a O U > Q L L ° u v > O U Y C L O O L v L > O E E C Ss v O v L v u C t .� O O'� ..., � M 'a Q 7 O v Q) 0 > G7 1•CU I CO N + � O C ii C j OJ wa 0Op U U 1=6L p O O d S z LA U LJJ Il L O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Ln Ln O O LPS LPS O O O O O O O O Ln O O O LA N 00 Ln N M N N N N Ln Ln O :3- Ln N N Ln Ln Ln M N —1 —1 N —i M N N N c -I M c -I c -I 06 Q N +1 N t/? t/? t/? t/? t/? t/? t/? t/? t/? t/? t/? t/? t/? t/? t/? t/? t/? t/? t/? tA• O U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a° 0 0 0 o o (D0 C N LPL LPL Q) Lno Ql LPL LPL 'C r -I l0 LPI N M r -I r -I N L tA• tA• tA• tA• tA• tA• tA• tA• N u n n � 0 v C � I L ) 1 O L U Q L]0 3U L m 'a U V U \ LF - O _0 'a 'a l]4 O ++ O O a an O C .L i U 6 ate+ i L ISS aL+ \ Q 0 > V C C N O O N N L 7 a-+ L L t L O > O "a O O N 3 f0 • O OJ O u u i N N E OA v a N +� O E a+ f6 m U E C C 7 0 u O to OJ OA `� O > a IM L �_ f6 V y Q) lJ 2 p O Ili 'a XOOO L +.0 O L Ili �j +) x r O Ss of o a_ i a t v N / E m C OJ U U 3 L -a OJ 0 L OJ O tiO VI V VI VI M d p O O d Z 0 LL LA U w 0 LU LA - 2 -12 172 Queen Street North, Current Detached Garage, 1. Condition of Roof, Figure 1: Side view of Garage; note that the roof is sagging towards the centre Figure 2: Front Corner of Roof,• Soffits damaged, and facia is coming away. Particle board is de -laminating due to water damage Figure 3: Side of Roof,• soffits have come away. Many exposed nails. Rafters extend outside of structure and are in poor condition, Some have rotted/broken away 2-13 Figure 4: Front corner of Garage, roof. Particle board is water damaged and delaminating and rotting Figure 5: Roof, south-east side of garage, soffits coming away, rafters extend beyond side of building and are damaged, rotting Figure 6: Roof, from inside of garage, water damage visible. No roof ties present Ridge board is segmented and roof is sagging 2-14 2. Condition of Existing Doors; Af Figure 7: (Left) Overhead door in "closed" position. Door does not close /seal properly, as opening for door is not standard size and standard -size door was fit poorly. Door does not lock Figure 8: Side door. Door does not open. Framing appears to have shifted, holding the door closed. Also, appears that door has been intentionally sealed, by boards nailed in place 3. Condition of cladding, facia, exterior Figure 9; South-east side of garage; large hole in structure, poorly patched by previous owner. Has allowed animals a path inside 2-15 Figure 10; Front north-east corner, front south-east corner, rear of garage. Facia is crumbling and leaving holes in the walls Figure 11: Rear westface of garage, south eastface, rear south face. Garage had 'patch work" previously, however significant holes in the structure remain and is not weather tight. 2-16 4. Condition of Structure Figure 12: Rear of garage. structure has been modified /patched, poorly, with various materials, but leaving significant gaps for pests to enter Figure 13: interior structure showing crumbling panels, electrical no longer hooked up, water damage on ceiling and on roof materials. Multiple holes in cladding 2-17 Figure 14: Interior, showing rotting structure, patched /modified structure rear, ceiling sagging 2-18 HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION & SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS Planning Division — 200 King Street West, 6t' Floor <AWV--> P.O. Box 1118, Kitchener ON N2G 4G7 KJR7"MNER 519-741-2426; planning(cD-kitchener.ca Date Received: Accepted By: Application Number, HPA-2020- PART 13: HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION FORM 1. NATURE OF APPLICATION El Exterior El Interior El Signage n Demolition 9 New Construction El Alteration El Relocation 2. SUBJECT PROPERTY Municipal Address: 5-frep't mo--fln' -11(14atoer Legal Description (if know): Build ing/Structure Type: D/Residential M Commercial El Industrial El Institutional Heritage Designation: D Part IV (individual) 12/Part V (Heritage Conservation District) Is the property subject to a Heritage Easement or Agreement? 0 Yes eN o Address: I 7,� nveep �Arei" klo'r4� City/Province/Postal Code: (6 c A eo le r' -1 onf-aro , w a -SR N 4. AGENT (if applicable) Name: Company: Address: City/Province/Postal Code: Phone: Email: 2020 City of Kitchener— Heritage Permit Application & Submission Requirements 2 --Pag179b 5. WRITTEN DESCRIPTION Provide a written description of the project including any conservation methods proposed. Provide such detail as materials to be used, measurements, paint colours, decorative details, whether any original building fabric is to be removed or replaced, etc. Use additional pages as required. Please refer to the City of Kitchener Heritage Permit Application Submission Guidelines for further direction. 6. REVIEW OF CITY OF KITCHENER HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMISSION GUIDELINES Describe why it is necessary to undertake the proposed work: 0AAk 94VC1+vV— 1-5 lk 4pirIL ;Ad twU-, IA14� r lop �AA" 440 lkx(A .I '5e'e- ojv,-6,,) JluetJi I Describe how the proposal is consistent with the Part IV individual designating by-law or the Part V Heritage Conservation District Plan: Describe how the proposal is consistent with Parks Canada's Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (www.historicplaces.ca/en/pages/standards-normes.asp ateo *ea- we, -4f,2-_bVJ; 7. PROPOSED WORKS CJkuy a) Expected start date: 5�t�L41 r1oil Expected completion date: Q � b) Have you discussed this work with Heritage Planning Staff? ETYes No - If yes, who did you speak to? i A c) Have you discussed this work with Building Division Staff? El Yes E] No - If yes, who did you speak to? d) Have you applied for a Building Permit for this work? El Yes E] No e) Other related Building or Planning applications: Application number q(5 - 1-2 5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The undersigned acknowledges that all of the statements contained in documents filed in support of this application shall be deemed part of this application. The undersigned acknowledges that receipt of this application by the City of Kitchener - Planning Division does not guarantee it to be a 'complete' application. The undersigned acknowledges that the Council of the City of Kitchener shall determine whether the information submitted forms a complete application. Further review of the application will be undertaken and the owner or agent may be contacted to provide additional information and/or resolve any discrepancies or issues with the application as submitted. Once the application is deemed to be fully complete, the application will be processed and, if necessary, scheduled for the next available Heritage Kitchener committee and Council meeting. Submission of this application constitutes consent for authorized municipal staff to enter upon the subject property for the purpose of conducting site visits, including taking photographs, which are 2020 City of Kitchener— Heritage Permit Application & Submission Requirements 2P,-ge20 necessary for the evaluation of this application. The undersigned acknowledges that where an agent has been identified, the municipality is authorized but not required to contact this person in lieu of the owner and this person is authorized to act on behalf of the owner for all matters respecting the application. The undersigned agrees that the proposed work shall be done in accordance with this application and understands that the approval of this application under the Ontario Heritage Act shall not be a waiver of any of the provisions of any by-law of the City of Kitchener or legislation including but not limited to the requirements of the Building Code and the Zoning By-law. The undersigned acknowledges that in the event this application is approved, any departure from the conditions imposed by the Council of the City of Kitchener or from the plans or specifications approved by the Council of the City of Kitchener is prohibited and could result in a fine being imposed or im risonment as provided for under the Ontario Heritage Act. Signature of Owner/Agent: 7 Date: 29- . – /I – a2-0,3 6 Signature of Owner/Agent:_ L- MEMEL— Date: 6. AUTHORIZATION If this application is being made by an agent on behalf of the property owner, the following authorization must be completed: I /We, , owner of the land that is subject of this application, hereby authorize Signature of Owner/Agent: Date: Signature of Owner/Agent: Date: to act on my / our behalf in this regard. The personal information on this form is collected under the legal authority of Section 33(2), Section 42(2), and Section 42(2.2) of the Ontario Heritage Act. The information will be used for the purposes of administering the Heritage Permit Application and ensuring appropriate service of notice of receipt under Section 33(3) and Section 42(3) of the Ontario Heritage Act. If you have any questions about this collection of personal information, please contact the Manager of Corporate Records, Legislated Services Division, City of Kitchener (519-741-2769). STAFF USE ONLY Application Number: Application Received: Application Complete:_ Notice of Receipt: Notice of Decision: 90 -Day Expiry Date: PROCESS: ❑ Heritage Planning Staff: ❑ Heritage Kitchener: ❑ Council: 2020 City of Kitchener — Heritage Permit Application & Submission Requirements 2 "Pa2 L O U w o O to Q lwO oo o = O N o 0 LE j o W M EE I O Q m F F W O o rn twitti U E gz Q z a\\�� / W cG m to 0 o O 2 w p U Q O J Olw O \j\\ 12 Q o w O O O O 1, W W OU U Z _S O E m i W z o zb to \� z \\\\ H Q N b O o w O o Q w 0 - w LL \\\/\\ LU m w K O z 0 W w O N 2 w -mn O o o o O I Y H y O m \/\ j \\\\\ U W_ w O 1 o w m a m a� o W a o \\ VA/VAA� d LU I I m U U \/ \/ // o \\\�\\\\�\\�\\�� L o m E �. K B E a W O a ' a w Q E x ELU OOb WnWINIW�� A�VAA�VA m Z N N >_ V� �� yvvv vvvvv r C) N 0 O ��o o m L.4o-abl • - I- f U < s u t 11tlM N0018 v 1. N oo DiDdONOO a f• � i o oo Q o Q �a e o w m %.%�.. " _ _ E w E? o M W 0 a �- o 40/11o oa z o x o to Foo to Q E w oo z o a o T to O m L8-,61 Z Ozo �W 0 w N w 0 OS6Z 11ddOS d0 301S2130Nn z o Z O LznE,z1] U W 0 O 6aLE 40021 d0 AVDd Ol'1H013H IlVdDAO CO LL a9L 8921 MOONIM w� to o o o •oto= z o L.0 ,00 8a0E I ME WE N -�_ UJ ' U W \ oM Z <o�_, o 1, L_ W o LL CO r. o I mm ��' C6 Of w m u Q W 0 o o a aT° 9n`%�"n9„ o C W 0 Q Q I..o-.81 Lt -M 77 � LIDa 8£bZ 904 CO W �� CO W wo �wz 0 ao zao *• O m c O-_ O �o LLoo Z oa ww zao Z o I w o z Z F o Z m> a J 0o z o a LL _ LL O 2 O yTjyTj� K O w E w O � o yTyT� Q �io LU o w %�`Ty7Ty7T Q o ❑ W w � � o ? Q i�i`� ? t=il Q X LUU d Z C7 O (N a�so W ��y W o mw�a U O _ w o � W d �[ Z o p W S N N n U Z N CO LL O O F _ 2 O X � 0 I w o c o ? O Q Q� F o ti� zLL �� F�� Y o? m LL� O W O e� am w5~ W w� in zo H W p7 z O O S d W U Q O < � U ~ Q U OZ J LL Z p O Z Q FD W JCO H LL W0 Q m > O Q W UP U O F- O W p W Hzm p Cl) � Q LE-zil 9ELE 'SIT H1091VO1d ll) I.k.61 HIE llddOS d0 301SH30Nn W LU � � F- Q O m W = _ CWJ � e� H— ¢ a 2 0Coe E � Cl) W U` O W F7 -p D z w LU J O CoLL LU CO Q W oLLa . 0 0, o o Q %�% \J 0 U �� F- 55 W, ,Y `MEj0m Z (D w z w0 LL Q Cl) '¢ 2-24 O 2 O yTjyTj� K O w E w O � o yTyT� Q �io o w %�`Ty7Ty7T o ❑ W w � � o ? i�i`� ? t=il Q X �yTj� Z C7 O (N a�so ��y W o mw�a U w o � W d o O O F _ 2 O X � 0 I w o c o ? O Q Q� F o ti� zLL �� F�� Y o? m LL� O W O e� am w5~ W w� in Staff Report ` Develo lnent5ervicesDepartr7ent www.kitchenerca REPORT TO: Heritage Kitchener DATE OF MEETING: January 5, 2021 SUBMITTED BY: Bustamante, Rosa, Director of Planning, 519-741-2200 ext. 7319 PREPARED BY: Grohn, Victoria, Heritage Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7041 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 5 DATE OF REPORT: December 22, 2020 REPORT NO.: DSD -21-003 SUBJECT: H PA -2021 -IV -004 68 Saddlebrook Court (formerly 710 Huron Road) Construction of addition and replacement of windows RECOMMENDATION: That pursuant to Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Heritage Permit Application HPA-2021-IV-004 be approved to permit the construction of an addition and the replacement of windows on the property municipally addressed as 68 Saddlebrook Court, in accordance with the plans and supplementary information submitted with the application and subject to the following condition: 1. That the final building permit drawings be reviewed and heritage clearance provided by Heritage Planning staff prior to the issuance of a building permit. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: This report supports the delivery of core services. BACKGROUND: The Development Services Department is in receipt of Heritage Permit Application HPA- 2021-IV-004 which is seeking permission to construct an addition and replace windows on the property municipally addressed as 68 Saddlebrook Court. The property was formerly addressed as 710 Huron Road, which was subject to a plan of subdivision, including an approved Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) and Conservation Plan. The building was successfully relocated in 2018 and is situated on a new lot within the subdivision. REPORT: The subject property is located on the west side of Saddlebrook Court south of Huron Road. The property is designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act with the stone farmhouse being the principal resource contributing to the heritage value of the property. *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. 3-1 94s 2 / �79 / f' 991 1 / j)I l Y Ili 23 27 �1 748 31 Z� /2 t8 35 4fi V 4Ys to \�� -^ S9 - 4 d 39 � Jf 2 8 \ l 48 8 730 10 Ik 47 2 14 `45"p� 3 a 5 i� / 138 j /\T�V 7 5 1f 48 \ 3 1517 / 21 ` / 2B2 30 ,tti 79 34 k 9 30 5 / 40 38 411 3 �O1 12 42 IN �r t87 f 44 785 ,s•" � 76 � 9t � V 95 .49 Location Map: 68 Saddlebrook Court The property features a one -and -a -half storey stone farmhouse constructed in the Gothic Revival architectural style. It is thought that the Grant family constructed the dwelling around 1864. The stone farmhouse, together with other stone residences located in close proximity and also built by Scottish/English settlers in the mid -19th century, contributes to the understanding of a community and a unique settlement pattern in the City. Existing left, front, and right elevations (68 Saddlebrook Crt) Cultural Heritaae Value or Interest Designation by-law 2020-062 identifies the following heritage attributes of the stone dwelling as being of cultural heritage value or interest'. • Shaped granite stone courses on all elevations and lintels above window openings-, • Roof and roof line which features a modified cross -gable pattern and two chimneys-, 3-2 • Centre wall dormer/gable on the north elevation; • Rectangular window openings on the north, east and west elevations; • Round arched window openings in the centre gable; and • Early 20th century classically -inspired entablature surrounding the main entrance door on the north elevation. Addition to Existing Dwelling Heritage Permit Application HPA-2021-IV-004 is seeking permission to construct a one storey addition on the south west portion of the existing stone heritage building. Planning application requirements associated with the surrounding subdivision included the preparation of a Conservation Plan for the stone farmhouse. The approved Conservation Plan contains guidance in siting the heritage stone building on a corner lot and in introducing new features such as an addition, garage, and landscaping. The proposed addition is 747 square feet. The addition is proposed to be clad in neutral brick with a stone skirt complementary to the existing stone heritage building, incorporate a hip roof, and a 2 -bay garage with separate doors. i Model with southeast view of proposed addition (Massing purposes only) Front elevation of proposed addition 3-3 lrrrra►' - - ■: r s ». � %1 fit � +A � •i��; � A01•/ • i/ fat r•/'�� rr1 rl►i:\}a11JR • !! •/ 7N .rr7•■.1IUM ■r!�!■ Irvr,� •1r1r7•� ■r7•r +n.■■ 4 "4z��.�=rll .a=i Ia ' ; . tO tai i � 1.,� 1 i MOW • i 4 � �i �*f �! ■1\ ,.I■ �H�I ��\ �� r iit!■ • +l ilii *i �{•a*R - • .. �_i71• I�r • �,. afi1 f�1i a�l 1\ !Ip/\.\/a H./ ��F/i �� llw►��• ■kq. ppaR 1to000i 1 *%egp/\N.1/ii so,%WA06 iii �;`� rr�;a:rr �; r/• rr� 11 1• �gr>t`r� �� r/{•rr!! �� ■`�f.;flri �f� �i�•�f�r��+�. ��1!r!-n lai lei\•i f r��ri►*&I+ "� • a • •� •�! i 4a 1. , rl • I. • 4 �•�111+J\\\�I/� S1�l� • 7f/�\'fA'•i;!!M •\�Ii \ilxli+ •/+!� 1'►/�Ylii -- Nf ■n1■ -1. i + •H1 nN ■! a Hb 1H�,. u!N !�-0111*1111 l•ro\ if � r// 1i�ri•f�lllll �IIII I rAl • 1114 f • / ! it 1 s!�/ Sr iii 1 • _= -- •7�r �4 MEN iiia. • la ♦7 •r �� --- I�,i1 ,• �%• �� fit.■1 � it lid/'•.L �� __ X11!! �!\! ■�■ !\!� �� H 11 f!!1• �� -r�r ~ �1a�Rafi 71a�i i11'!� �� - Ll/f 11 JI. v\t !! ,rl N ♦\► H . J � 1• A.!!• vN NSR A !if v.\/ �--_ N•y VrH•: '� JI•�1 �!1•� rr1•:t ij1* �nw%�• 1l��I r lei p4oi�1:'�f 7��.'#i r Front elevation of existing dwelling Lot layout from approved Conservation Plan HPA-2021-IV-004 is also seeking permission to replace the existing windows, which are not original to the stone heritage building, with replacement windows to match the existing composition in the existing window openings. Additional details regarding application HPA- 2021-IV-004 are attached in Appendix A. Heritage Planning Comments Heritage Design Guidelines for the stone heritage building were prepared in keeping with the approved Heritage Impact Assessment and Conservation Plan. The Heritage Design Guidelines provide direction for the location, materials, and architectural details of an addition on the existing stone building. The proposed addition meets the "Eight Guiding Principles in the Conservation of Historical Properties", particularly: 3-4 Legibility — new design added to heritage resources should be distinguishable from the old. New elements should be subordinate so as not to overwhelm the character of the historic resource. The proposed addition meets the following from Parks Canada's "The Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada". • Conserve the heritage value and character -defining elements when creating any new additions to a historic place or any related new construction. Make the new work physically and visually compatible with, subordinate to, and distinguishable from the historic place. In reviewing the merits of the application, Heritage Planning staff note the following: • The subject property is designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act; • The proposed addition, while sizeable, is sited in an appropriate location away from the front facade of the stone heritage building and is designed to be subordinate to the stone heritage building; • The proposed addition is in keeping with the Heritage Design Guidelines: o Location and plan — the proposed addition is located at the rear of the existing dwelling; o Width — the proposed addition is slightly narrower and not directly in line with the existing dwelling; o Height and roof type — the proposed new addition is shorter than the existing dwelling and features a hip roof design; o Style, material, and colour — the proposed new addition is clad in neutral brick and is distinguishable in style and complementary to the existing stone dwelling; o Windows — the proportion, location, size, and position of the windows on the proposed new addition is complementary to the existing dwelling; o Garage — the double car garage features two single doors to soften its appearance; The proposed addition follows the relevant "Eight Guiding Principles in the Conservation of Built Heritage Properties" and the relevant Parks Canada's "Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada"; and The proposed addition will not adversely affect the character of the property nor the heritage attributes of the existing dwelling. In accordance with the Heritage Permit Application form, the approval of an application under the Ontario Heritage Act shall not be a waiver of any of the provisions of any by-law of the City of Kitchener or legislation, including, but not limited to, the requirements of the Ontario Building Code and Zoning By-law. In this regard, staff confirm that a Building Permit is required to carry out this work. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: N/A 3-5 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the Heritage Kitchener committee meeting. CONSULT — Heritage Kitchener has been consulted regarding the subject Heritage Permit Application. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: • CSD -17-054 (Designation of the property currently municipally addressed as 710 Huron Road under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act) • Ontario Heritage Act APPROVED BY: Justin Readman, General Manager, Development Services ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A — Heritage Permit Application H PA -2021 -IV-004 3-6 jai �.�. _� ask STAFF USE ONLY Date Received: HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION & SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS Planning Division - 200 King Street West, 6th Floor P.O. Box 1118, Kitchener ON N2G 4G7 519-741-2426; planninggkitchener.ca H PA -2020 - PART B: HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION FORM Number: 1. NATURE OF APPLICATION © Exterior © Interior ❑ Signage ❑ Demolition ❑ New Construction 0 Alteration ❑ Relocation 2. SUBJECT PROPERTY Municipal Address: 6 S S Aoo� E i3R�v� �auCL-� Legal Description (if know): REG.. VLNV. A# 59 tA-644 1-03 7 Building/Structure Type: Z Residential ❑ Commercial ❑ Industrial ❑ Institutional Heritage Designation: ❑✓ Part IV (Individual) ❑ Part V (Heritage Conservation District) Is the property subject to a Heritage Easement or Agreement? ❑ Yes ® No 3. PROPERTY OWNER Name: Addre: City/Pr Phone Email: 4. AGENT (if applicable) Name: Company: Address: City/Province/Postal Code: Phone: Email: 2020 City of Kitchener— Heritage Permit Application & Submission Requirements 3ag&.7 07 5. WRITTEN DESCRIPTION Provide a written description of the project including any conservation methods proposed. Provide such detail as materials to be used, measurements, paint colours, decorative details, whether any original building fabric is to be removed or replaced, etc. Use additional pages as required. Please refer to the City of Kitchener Heritage Permit Application Submission Guidelines for further direction. 6. REVIEW OF CITY OF KITCHENER HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMISSION GUIDELINES Describe why it is necessary to undertake the proposed work: SEE hi-tNater,4 Describe how the proposal is consistent with the Part IV individual designating by-law or the Part V Heritage Conservation District Plan: 5cE ATTh E Describe how the proposal is consistent with Parks Canada's Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (www.historicplaces.calen/pages/standards-normes.asp 7. PROPOSED WORKS a) Expected start date: FEBRUARY 2021 Expected completion date: August 2021 b) Have you discussed this work with Heritage Planning Staff? 0 Yes ❑ No - If yes, who did you speak to? 1�G �c�tA G►�o Nil c) Have you discussed this work with Building Division Staff? D Yes ❑ No - If yes, who did you speak to? 5 NV_K• k d) Have you applied for a Building Permit for this work? 0 Yes ❑ No e) Other related Building or Planning applications: Application number 5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The undersigned acknowledges that all of the statements contained in documents filed in support of this application shall be deemed part of this application. The undersigned acknowledges that receipt of this application by the City of Kitchener - Planning Division does not guarantee it to be a `complete' application. The undersigned acknowledges that the Council of the City of Kitchener shall determine whether the information submitted forms a complete application. Further review of the application will be undertaken and the owner or agent may be contacted to provide additional information and/or resolve any discrepancies or issues with the application as submitted. Once the application is deemed to be fully complete, the application will be processed and, if necessary, scheduled for the next available Heritage Kitchener committee and Council meeting. Submission of this application constitutes consent for authorized municipal staff to enter upon the subject property for the purpose of conducting site visits, including taking photographs, which are 2020 City of Kitchener— Heritage Permit Application & Submission Requirements �agee 8, necessary for the evaluation of this application. The undersigned acknowledges that where an agent has been identified, the municipality is authorized but not required to contact this person in lieu of the owner and this person is authorized to act on behalf of the owner for all matters respecting the application. The undersigned agrees that the proposed work shall be done in accordance with this application and understands that the approval of this application under the Ontario Heritage Act shall not be a waiver of any of the provisions of any by-law of the City of Kitchener or legislation including but not limited to the requirements of the Building Code and the Zoning By-law. The undersigned acknowledges that in the event this application is approved, any departure from the conditions imposed by the Council of the City of Kitchener or from the plans or specifications approved by the Council of the City of Kitchener is prohibited and could result in a fine being imposed or imprisonment as provided for under the Ontario Heritage Act. Signature of Owner/Agent: Date: SEFT 21 ZZ -OZ -0 Signature of Owner/Agent: Date: 6. AUTHORIZATION If this application is being made by an agent on behalf of the property owner, the following authorization must be completed: I /We, , owner of the land that is subject of this application, hereby authorize Signature of Owner/Agent: Date: Signature of Owner/Agent: Date: to act on my / our behalf in this regard. The personal information on this form is collected under the legal authority of Section 33(2), Section 42(2), and Section 42(2.2) of the Ontario Heritage Act. The information will be used for the purposes of administering the Heritage Permit Application and ensuring appropriate service of notice of receipt under Section 33(3) and Section 42(3) of the Ontario Heritage Act. If you have any questions about this collection of personal information, please contact the Manager of Corporate Records, Legislated Services Division, City of Kitchener (519-741-2769). STAFF USE ONLY Application Number: Application Received: Application Complete: Notice of Receipt: Notice of Decision: 90 -Day Expiry Date: PROCESS: ❑ Heritage Planning Staff: ❑ Heritage Kitchener: ❑ Council: 2020 City of Kitchener — Heritage Permit Application & Submission Requirements 3 age 9 C9 Heritage Property 68 Saddlebrook Court (previously 710 Huron Road) 5. Written descriation The farmhouse is a Gothic Revival stone building with a footprint of 1126 square feet. The granite masonry is neatly squared and coursed on the north and west elevations, with less care having been taken by the mason on the east and south facades. Current windows are replacements consisting of vinyl operable sash with metal cladding likely covering the wood frames and casing of the original, or at least earlier, windows. Current windows are to be replaced with new double hung windows to keep the same look as existing building, new window will be sized to fit in existing openings as to not disturb surrounding heritage masonry work. Windows where recommended to be replaced in the Building assessment done by George Robb Architect in October of 2014. All interior walls and floors of existing heritage house are being removed, and replaced with new structure. All precautions will be taken to ensure structural integrity of existing structure during renovations. Existing interior time is 7" flat baseboards and 4" colonial casing, proposed new interior trim is 7" colonial baseboard and 3%2" colonial casing. New floor structure is proposed to be 14" engineered wood joists supported by 2x6 wood stud walls installed inside of existing stone structure walls. New floor and walls will not be supported by existing stone walls. The addition proposed to the south west side of the existing house is 1 story consisting of concrete foundation and brick facade main floor walls. 2 car garage is to have stone skirt. Floor height on addition to be the same as new floor height in heritage portion to create seamless transition between the two. Roof structure of addition to be hip style trusses and not extend past the soffit line of existing heritage house, shingles will be black to match existing house. The following items were identified as Heritage Attributes by the Conservation Plan Report prepared by MHBC in January 2015. - Original (northern) portion of the one and one half story shaped granite stone residence, including stone construction of the north, east and west elevations; - Early 20th century classically -inspired entablature surrounding the main entrance door; - Roofline which features a modified cross -gable pattern and two chimneys; - Centre wall dormer / gable on the north elevation; - Shaped stone courses and lintels above window openings; - Rectangular window openings on the north, east and west elevations; - Round arched window opening in the center gable; - Orientation to Huron Road. Proposed change will keep Original (northern) portion of the one and one half story shaped granite stone residence, including stone construction of the north, east and west elevations intact. Roofline on existing building to remain the same including cross gable pattern and two chimneys. Center wall dormer / gable on the north elevation to remain on proposed changes, highlighted on interior by open to below area in new stair well. Rectangular window opening and rounded arched window opening in existing building to remain however windows to be replaced with new windows to match existing style. Orientation to Huron road has been changed when house was moved to new location however the previous front elevation is still exposed to Saddlebrook court. Early 20th century trim surrounding front do to remain after proposed alterations. 3-10 6. Describe why it is necessary to undertake the proposed work The property has been approved for redevelopment in the form of a new residential subdivision. In order to achieve the proposed subdivision plan it is necessary to conserve the original stone farmhouse, demolish the twentieth century additions thereto, and relocate the farmhouse to a nearby site on a large lot within the proposed subdivision plan. The intent is to restore the farmhouse once relocated, under a separate heritage permit from this application. Describe how the proposal is consistent with the Part IV individual designating by-law or the Part V Heritage Conservation District Plan: Currently, the House is not designated under the Ontario Heritage Act, but it is listed. As such, the proposed conservation work will ensure that the heritage attributes, historic material, and original fabric will be maintained. Describe how the proposal is consistent with Parks Canada's Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada: Documentation Substantial effort has been made to document the House and its character -defining elements and heritage attributes. Further documentation will be done prior to undertaking the work. To date, photographic records and measured drawings have been undertaken. In addition, numerous reports, including the Cultural Heritage Design Guidelines (MHBC Planning, January 19, 2018) document the House. In regards to archival documentation, historic photographs and drawings have been referenced in order to guide the proposed conservation work. Respect for historic material and/or original fabric Historic material and/or original fabric such as the stone walls will be repaired and conserved. Minimal intervention will be necessary to maintain the condition of historic material. This proposal intends to respect these principles. The renovation conserving the stone house and adding the addition is to ensure its continued use as a single family home. 3-11 Existing Front Elevation Existing Left Elevation 3-12 L.a �w Existing Right Elevation Front Door Trim 3-13 Preliminary Streetscape (civic 64, 68 and 72 Saddlebrook) massing purpose only 3-14 -1M„S4,6Z.Z4N 69l'6=b p �� - ti sem. s. rnp� �b-J '��1 0 9p's ,o. bS eN —x— —X—ci i i — o OS'Z I I I I O I m I J a m aa L --------- J 4 I - IL J =�N JLJ O w z 0 3mNmm r — — pui�M� I 0 C 0 -ommmm }J ro >0 U Q Q N N ,BOLL Q o- \ C z O d w v a x zo Z m ¢m° �CC ° � G e CD L "' z z �� Q c Og•Z L is 0 a E — O Un0 27 QJ v L QJ v c v l � � O N v U u CL QJ t�4- �L N 0 o N S T T Q! c�JU U o Ln -1M„S4,6Z.Z4N 69l'6=b p �� - ti sem. s. rnp� �b-J '��1 0 9p's ,o. bS eN —x— —X—ci i i — o OS'Z I I I I O I m I J a m aa L --------- J 4 I - IL J =�N JLJ -6 00 U - 00 � 0p N Z oa� xX N C Ln i 'c V 3 c L t W WL� Z N Y — N 3 _ O] W J I^ N V / F Z O � 2 U ° O W E � N O IO I N ^ U v/ ooOD M M o ai N Y Uaa ” O LL N JO > V > w IMW (NoD J r Q r V) W V) ^0 LL O } w It X w w lo OA cL oo oo0} 00 a � gwz zoo o z}mg x�¢ ,n �U ¢>m W Z � � W W ¢ m Z Q z -- L= z W a W ¢ z 0 Z 0Z - ¢ m O w z 0 3mNmm r — — pui�M� I ¢ ¢ w� -ommmm h� >0 per' N N ,BOLL o- 3 z O d w in adz zo Z z ¢m° d' ° L JL----� — — — o v "' z z �� Q w Og•Z — �0'g b — O Un0 27 O M l � � O N z d r lI ti III III III T"--- t6£ ZZ \� M„S4,6Z.ZbN 00 0 J -6 00 U - 00 � 0p N Z oa� xX N C Ln i 'c V 3 c L t W WL� Z N Y — N 3 _ O] W J I^ N V / F Z O � 2 U ° O W E � N O IO I N ^ U v/ ooOD M M o ai N Y Uaa ” O LL N JO > V > w IMW (NoD J r Q r V) W V) ^0 LL O } w It X w w lo OA cL oo oo0} 00 a � gwz zoo o z}mg x�¢ ,n �U ¢>m W Z � � W W ¢ m Z Q z -- L= z W a W ¢ z 0 Z 0Z - ¢ m O w z 0 ¢ ¢ w� >0 N N ,BOLL o- 3 z O d w in adz m z ¢m° ° z0¢ o v "' z z 4� 15J z Un0 F a „8 „b',b z� o ozo arc um OSa ZXIb OSa MM, A ,d -X J F X33- blF add- bl� o F z —1 ..9-.9 o = u I o ..0-.6 l I I I I I I l u OZ/ZZ/60 31tla „Z/l L-.8 Q Ww U W z paMlpulsy:31vos Ndld 1N3W38d8 LJJ 2 W �I 0 LO m C, LQ aa:AU NMVaa aim £68Z - 3snOH 30VIIN3H 5 _ � m ,a M-a:Ae a3Nols3a sNlMOdd Q S1S z W o � z OOX io3road Ig` o N v:Nolivn313 :ON 103road 3WOH AIIWVJ 310NIS o LLL6= 000 :ON ial = Q L 101 `N3N3HOlIN `NSS m ea ea :3nssl :3iva :ON aaaaonnanivis F a „8 „b',b z� o ozo arc um OSa ZXIb OSa MM, A ,d -X J F X33- blF add- bl� o F z —1 a ..9-.9 o = u I o ..0-.6 l I I I I I I l u „Z/l L-.8 Q S1SIOf al3'ON3 bl a Q U W z S1 SIOf al3'O N3 bl W �I o C, LQ Ei m Iz— S1S Or N3bl o � z OOX 77 -7 -7 -, i TPF� M --d O� ®ZObIS °I - - IS o OOg6On WMM, 1 ..0-.9 I„0 -,BZ ' „Z/l l-.8 ' „Z/l 9-& 1 T -E/., 10 11 o Fo — ��taii zwz ��o 8. wFLL�� QO - 6i o- Fo' XW - O �TU� m0 — MF OX OX o rc=w �"-o XWo + ZO+ vlo om Wz�il voila op �z o� —o s=��< — = 1�o ril ��o —o.�o- a ��1 4,w o oo� oz� z� o��o� N mamoo� a�zo�o�w< o<�o� �z LL ami<� <�� m M oa8,o m Z J o a O J LL H LU F WN w OZ/ZZ/6031tl0 'lJ 'OS ZLB - NVId NOOIJ NIVW na,e�n� w3,tlas w 0: 0 m aim £68Z - 3snOH 30VIIN3H N aa:Ad NMVaa OIW.LN0:A8 a3NOls3a a: � aNiMtlaa Q z W V:NO iVA313 103road 3WOH AIIWVJ 310NIS Imo o ' :ON 103road N Q :ON la, L l0l `213N3H011� `�8S —L6L6000 0NIN21OM�Saltlls 80 a0 3ASSl 31Va :ON m a F I-Uw _— wW w_wu�o��o m z zumo o moo G 0 z wF�j w0 Fp o as w<o Um��ar omaa�O o�� arcs c�xa zrc� Ym OAU m a`u� O AL -,09 A -S „L -,8Z .z-.8 ..9 -BL f „Ul l -,Z Ol-£Z „Ul l -,Z ..Z-.8 ..6 „0-81 ..6 a9ON3H OLXZ-Z „Z/l l -,S ,S -,El „Z/l E-.9 a9ON3H OLxZ-Z OSx„Z/666 OSa 68 x,.Z/666 'a03JVaVeVJ l�Lx,80L08-aOaJM 'a03JVaVJlx,8 OL08-aOaJM osa 1-- osa . Lx.S£ WWW- Lb£HO lll-0�� — Sa £8 X W 00 _ O _ ..UL OL -8 ..8 „Ul b -,S �d-d „8-,bm „Za LL -z W � X — 0 0. 0 2- - - - aO O X zn a -.z - J - 0> Y o ..Z/l 6,b _Z/L E-£ i UL S -d -wase ------- -------- ,Ul b-8 `� _ na/ o w _ 0 o Q _ Q -- > LL El wase — ra z 0 00 MO w CL I - „Ul „ULE „Z -Al p �j o osa LLXS6 osa �� LXS£ L_ X — xxx- Lb£o fff-0 „UL 6-.b ,A1 -8l b£HO „UL Z -,S _^w „OL -£Z -m�w� Z/ l -,Z „Z/L 0-.8 ..Z/LLL ..6-.L[..6-.L[..UL l l a'w a o .- z 00 =,o a .0--=o O o�gwm ez „zno.e „znLSL o -W d -S -.SS w w — o m ..6 - - x�'>= Y .oa �Y 10 - -XO woo OOXm -z do 3mm-rc O O oO K zrz 0� aK aOO+ Oz 0�1 o UOm wpz 1OOz0 ZO 0 w wO z�X�0 2 0 - 0 00 z mi ~U �W J olo a 02 g yamz 0—W1xaTH <<� 17 031tl0 OZ/ZZ/6JX W u) w 'lJ '0S 6206- NVId 2100Ij 4N003S LU 0 na,e�n� �v3,tlaS 'US M as Ad NMVaa _ m aj £68Z - 3snOH 30VIIN3H —61a3NOIS3a � 5 aNlMtlaa Q z W V:NOIiVA313 lo3road 3WOH AIIWVJ 310NIS Ig` N :ON 103road o o LLL6= = Q 000 :ON la, L l0l `213N3H011� `�8S aNIN210M :Saltlls 80 a0 :3ASSl :31Va =0N m x �w K W wo – –cwi �z o>j = rc�m a�rc� ,Za l -Z „0 -,Ll ,Z/lE l -Z E ,Z/l l -M ,Z/l l -Z ,Za l-.9 ,Z/l Ol-S OSH .� bX..6Z 111- 118ZO ,Al „Z/l E -S OS21 �� bX..6Z f1f1R bb8Z0 Cl) cr m Q ujg m J I � „o, -.b „u, E „o -s = a — a --- - ,Z/l Ol-,E z =Ex zs, o _ J ��MII LL — � ..o -s o - U I � 0 0 _ � LV = W � zn s -.E c' 0 s ca W W – – U Tr OSa „ bX,6Z MMM "8ZO 6-.b ,Z/l OSa „ bX..6Z AAA- 118ZO E -Al Z/l Z-.1 0 _ – O~G tsii X - - - p 01 � z�rc OX O _~G X j - U p 10 � 00 o O20 .. rcz F� Zm f�i1F LL - p QO 0 0a�o x� w� k� _ �0� 0�� =zz – o pQa p crap_ 1� — wm<z��« _« 02 3: �� LIJU) LLL6=LU og0 co 3• OZ/ZZ/60!3iVG a L 101'N3N3H3llN'NSS --.Nl,,,- —,niv, "jiili', i ��' IIS II��IIIi!Ij�,i�,lll Ili Iil ullll �Ii�'I �'�illll',I� I� ILII LL 3-19 WN w LU 2 0: 0 Lo m _ � 5 z W Imo o N LLL6= m G w o � z p o � O\ 0 0 0 2 2 OZ/ZZ/60 31tla NOIIVA3131NOW 1j •uS £68Z - 3snOH 30VIIN3H aNiMvaa Q a 113 M ..0-4=A4:31vos CJ ry c> o aa:AU NMVaa QV JGU6! aa:AO a3NOIS3a o v:Noilvn313 lo3road 3WOH A11WVJ 310NIS L 101 `N3N3HOlIN `NSS 0 Urn :ON 103road 000 :ON la, aNIN210M :5N1tl15 8a 80 :3f1551 31V0 :aN „ a C- X-1 s G w o � z p o � O\ 0 0 0 2 2 113 M CJ ry c> o QV o o �"om 0 Urn .d-.8 , b -,l .A l -d ,9 ��-----Jl Z J� o a W J W FFFRH0 L----- Z J o LL 11 k'4 s „ a C- X-1 s WN w OZ/ZZ/6031Va w 2 ..0- =A4 3,vos NOIldA313 214321 0: 0 Lo m aa:Ad NMVaa lj •uS £68Z - 3snOH 30VIIN3H _ � Jau6iaa:Aa a3NOIS3a 5 aNiMVaa Q z W V:NoiiVA313 io3road Imo o N :ON 103road 3WOH AIIWVJ 310NIS a -WL6=000 :ON ia, L 101 `213N3H011� `�8S m 80 a0 :3ASSI :31Va :ON aNIN210M:Sa1Vis 10 o „Z/l ll -,9 FHI El C x U x Z a O ii�l w H �Q W > W F W az J z W � ®z Q oQ "z W w ' L-----' x e ---- x w a E- F FFR v' m Q, m N m co o) � lig - I I W W O W F „44 w Za 9-.8 „Z/l Z -.l .d-.8 „b -d .A l -d „9 X F, F W o d o P4 0.l W R W d C] d W c7 W Pa �zP:Iz�oz C, a z Fw¢oN i a.C)o 3-21 WN w OZ/ZZ/6031Va NOIIVA313 3aIS im 0-,�=..8/� 3,vas 0: w 0 m aim £68Z - 3snOH 30VIIN3H aa:Ad NMVaa Jau6iaa:Aa a3NOIS3a 5 _ � z W aNiMVaa Q V:NoiiVA313 io3road 3WOH AIIWVJ 310NIS Imo o N a :ON 103road :ON ia, L l0l `213N3H011� `�8S -WL6=000 aNIN210M:Sa1Vis 80 a0 :3ASSI :31Va :ON m — O10 0 p W W LL W a • � c m c cliw A • Q z A w - w o w • F" rai F, o U ca U a. ww w •xaao w w w c@ Q c F �Aoz� ao.z E.aa ao� a.o 3-22 OZ/ZZ/6031Va WN w 0-,�=..8/� 3,vas NOIIVA313 3aIS 1HOIN 0: w 0 m aa:Ad NMVaa aim £68Z - 3snOH 30VIIN3H M W 5 _ � Jau6iaa:Aa a3NOIS3a aNiMVaa Q z W V:NoiiVA313 io3road Imo N :ON 103road 3WOH AIIWVA 310NIS o a -WL6=000 :ON ia, aNIN210M:Sa1Vis L l0l `213N3H011� `�8S m 80 a0 :3ASSI :31Va :oN 1 d-.8 I J4 IT .A l-1 A Z O II \r\ / W -, W D H -------moi m Cd C c] co c II II I I ca ' ca z ca o U ca v a w w w El C/i r-. F }C C, w V a a C) U W d w s¢ wwwcc�a E-- 00 @Qoz�aa.z o a a w 0 w E. M d ® dt Q. 0 3-23 LIJU) co OZ/ZZ/60!3iVG -JXLU Nal ]S S 0 0 Maims ims 0 � LO \,am is e2 -]S 0H ]� 1 N]H ON LL02 o w w®d O Igo LU § §000 3n0H A and ]]� ■iO3PQd�/ B z z .: _ \ __ / Zl ]` ]N]H� I ` eg / 2)/(§>}/(([ }\�\\\ \\0 \ \(~ » 0� ;r \� . . 00 .[. . �( ® j(\\/,\ \\\\ /\ ,_\ \\\\�\\ j) ZMM §:n\§>: R _^ 7) 0 6) ( [ §n» [0- 001 A\` LLLLLi-I ; so : }~§\l§\\\ \b Kzz§\:§:\ =\ /\\\\ \ \ r § j§(/\/ r \ \ \\\\ \}\ \ \ § § 2-24 IF1 - 1 Vl N N 01 Lac OU O N N C= 7 O O Cu cc :�O � o rn w 3 N .0 O t t T U U a� 0 U 16 U yN .N O X C N 0 3 � -0 A � O N N U CN v O p t OCl N N p� GW7 T -O N N L O C E U V 3 N N o 2 n D U ( 3 CU O O CJ 'O N w a� A � y p ° A p U 0 Cid � It U ° � g r y N N N N rl 7� CC N Cu C N C N U� U� N ? N Wt NN M W O O O O O N N ed o 0 0 0 � > o xM U N o A b CA CA Z Z C) a in in Y°o t N N N 00 Ci C1 M 04 r 04 r Cu0 (n yip Co N M 0 p O O O N N N N Sir N N N N :4 x x x x r NM b c0 f� 00 Q1 O N M O 1D I� W Q1 O N M O 1D f� 00 Q1 O N M N N N N N N N N N N M M M M IF1 - 1