HomeMy WebLinkAboutAdjustment - 1996-04-16COA\1996-04-16
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT
FOR THE
CITY OF KITCHENER
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING HELD APRIL 16, 1996
MEMBERS PRESENT: Messrs. J. Gothard, D. McKnight, W. Dahms and A. Galloway.
Mr. R. Morgan, Co-ordinator, Zoning Administration, Mr.
Intermediate Planner, and Ms. D. H. Gilchrist, Secretary-Treasurer.
Mr. J. Gothard, Chairman, called the meeting to order at 9:30 a.m..
OFFICIALS PRESENT:
J. Willmer,
MINUTES
Moved by Mr. A. Galloway
Seconded by Mr. W. Dahms
That the Minutes of the regular meeting of the Committee of Adjustment, of March 19, 1996, as mailed to the
members, be accepted.
Carried
MINOR VARIANCE
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Submission No. A 13/96 - 454064 Ontario Inc., 25 Northland Drive, Waterloo,
Ontario
Re:
Lots 19 - 21, Registered Plan 258, Lots 47, 48, 49 and 51 and Part Lots 14-50, Registered Plan 251
and Part Lot 25, Registered Plan 404, 1253 King Street East, Kitchener, Ontario.
APPEARANCES:
IN SUPPORT:
Mr. G. Assimocopoulos
310-30 Blue Springs Drive
Waterloo, Ontario
CONTRA: NONE
WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS:
IN SUPPORT: NONE
CONTRA: NONE
The Committee was advised that the applicant is requesting to rent a unit in this plaza for use as a
restaurant and billiard hall and is requesting permission to provide thirty off-street parking spaces for this
use rather than the required 34 off-street parking spaces.
The Committee reviewed the comments of the Department of Planning and Development, in which they
advised that the applicant is requesting a parking variance to permit a restaurant/billiard hall to occupy one
unit in the existing commercial plaza. The unit is vacant and has a gross floor area of 510 square metres.
The application was previously deferred to allow the applicant to discuss options with staff. The applicant
now proposes to limit the amount of restaurant seating to approximately 18 seats, occupying a maximum
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT 67 APRIL 16, 1996
floor area of 56 square metres (600 square feet).
The gross floor area of the plaza is 1619 square metres. The by-law requires 1 parking space for every 27
square metres of gross floor area, or a total of 60 parking spaces for the entire plaza. The approved site
plan illustrates 45 parking spaces on the site. It is noted that the parking lot layout is not in agreement with
the approved plan and may not be functional in certain areas.
1. Submission No. A 13/96 - 454064 Ontario Inc. - cont'd
Prior to being rezoned to CR-4 by Stage 6 of the Comprehensive Zoning By-law in January 1994, the
property was zoned C3 with special use and special regulation provisions in By-law 4830. The former
zoning required a minimum of 45 parking spaces in recognition of the limited on-site parking available.
Existing uses in the plaza include a temporary office, a boxing club, a fitness club (which occupies two units)
and a computer business. The occupied units have a total gross floor area of 1109 square metres (68.5% of
the plaza). These units appear to have legal non-conforming status with respect to the parking regulations
of the current by-law, and require a total of 31 spaces (68.5% of the 45 spaces required by the former by-
law). This leaves a total of 14 spaces for the vacant unit, which now requires 19 spaces. The application
should be revised to request a variance reducing the parking requirement from 19 parking spaces to 14.
The proposed variance is desirable for the appropriate development and use of the land as the restaurant is
essentially an accessory use to the billiard hall, based on its limited floor area. The impact of the variance
can be considered to be minor as the 45 parking spaces provided on site appear to be sufficient for the uses
existing and proposed in the plaza. The general intent and purpose of the zoning by-law and official plan
are therefore maintained.
As noted in the original staff recommendation, staff are concerned that overflow parking would have very
few alternative parking opportunities. On street parking is not permitted on King Street or Charles Street.
Overflow parking would likely use neighbouring commercial businesses or residential side streets, such as
Sheldon Avenue North. If more intensive uses occupy units in the plaza, the shortage of parking could
become a problem again. Ultimately the parking lot should be expanded by consolidation of the plaza site
with the property addressed as 16 Sheldon Avenue South.
In the opinion of staff, the proposal can be considered to meet the four tests set out in Section 45 (1) of the
Planning Act.
The Department of Planning and Development recommends approval of Submission A 13/96, to reduce the
parking requirement from 19 parking spaces to 14 for a billiard hall, and a restaurant with a maximum 56
square metres of floor area devoted to patron seating, subject to the following conditions:
That the parking lot be demarcated in accordance with the approved site plan, to the satisfaction
of the Director of Traffic and Parking Services.
That condition 1 be satisfied prior to October 1, 1996.
Mr. Assimocopoulos addressed the Committee advising that the floor area for the restaurant has been
reduced to 600 sq. ft. He provided the Committee with a copy of a floor plan. When questioned by the
Committee, Mr. Assimocopoulos advised that he is asking for an amendment to the original application and
the Committee agreed to consider this request.
When questioned by the Committee, Mr. J. Willmer, Intermediate Planner, advised that this unit in the plaza
requires 19 parking spaces; however, based on the fact that the existing parking for this plaza is, overall,
less than that currently required, staff are reluctant to support a larger restaurant area, as restaurants are
demanding on parking. A smaller restaurant space is less intensive.
Mr. W. Dahms referred to page 2 of the Department of Planning & Development comments in which they
state that "...the proposal can be considered to meet the four tests ...". Mr. J. Willmer responded that staff
are concerned that other uses in the plaza may change and have an more intensive use of parking. In time
the tenant mix may change.
Mr. S. Kay questioned the requested condition and whether demarcating the parking lot may reduce the
number of parking spaces. Mr. J. Willmer explained that there are approximately 49 or 50 parking spaces
there now; however, some are not functional. The demarcation will provide 45 functional parking spaces as
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT 68 APRIL 16, 1996
shown on the approved plan.
Submission No. A 13/96 - 454064 Ontario Inc. - cont'd
Mr. A. Galloway advised that he would be in support of the amended application provided that it is tied to a
specific use.
Moved by Mr. A. Galloway
Seconded by Mr. S. Kay
That the application of 454064 Ontario Inc. requesting permission to provide 14 off-street parking spaces
rather than the required 19 off-street parking spaces for a billiard hall with a restaurant as an accessory use
and occupying only a maximum floor area of 56 m2, 600 sq. ft. to be devoted to patron seating on Lots 19-
21, Registered Plan 258, Lots 47, 48, 49 and 51 and Part Lots 14-50, Registered Plan 251 and Part Lot 25,
Registered Plan 404, 1253 King Street East, Kitchener, Ontario BE APPROVED subject to the following
condition:
That the parking lot be demarcated in accordance with the approved site plan, to the satisfaction
to the Director of Traffic & Parking Services prior to October 1, 1996.
It is the opinion of this Committee that:
The variances requested in this application are minor in nature.
This application is desirable for the appropriate development of the property.
The general intent and purpose of the City of Kitchener Zoning By-law and Official Plan are being
maintained on the subject property.
Carried
APPLICATIONS
1. Submission No. A 15/96 - Bill Nippel, 41 Howland Drive, Kitchener,
Ontario
Re:
Lot 27, Registered Plan 1242, 41 Howland Drive, Kitchener, Ontario.
APPEARANCES:
IN SUPPORT:
CONTRA:
WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS:
IN SUPPORT:
CONTRA:
Mr. B. Nippel
41 Howland Drive
Kitchener, Ontario
NONE
NONE
Mr. & Mrs. J. Jefferies
36 Howland Drive
Kitchener, Ontario
Ms. M. Leitch
14 Cartier Drive
Kitchener, Ontario
The Committee was advised that the applicant is requesting permission to construct a rear addition onto his
existing residence, measuring 6.71 m (22 ft.) by 7.32 m (24 ft.). The remaining rearyard, at the shortest
point will be 4.58 m (15 ft.) rather than the required 7.62 m (25 ft.).
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT 69 APRIL 16, 1996
The Committee reviewed the comments of the Department of Planning and Development, in which they
advised that the subject application seeks approval to construct an addition to an existing single detached
dwelling for a home business, which would result in a rear yard of 15 feet.
Submission No. A 15/96 - Bill Nippel - cont'd
A rear yard of 16.5 feet was approved by this Committee on November 21, 1995, and the owner found that
he had made an error in calculating the rear yard he would require for his addition. This change to the
variance does not change staff's original recommendation of support. It is our position that the resulting rear
yard is still sufficient and the variance is minor and maintains the intent of the by-law and Municipal Plan and
is desirable for the development of the property.
The Department of Planning and Development recommends approval of Application A-15/96, requesting
approval of a rear yard of 15 feet rather than 25 feet.
The Committee noted the comments of the Director of Building & Inspections in which he advised that a
building permit is required to construct a new addition.
The Committee considered the written submissions of the neighbours in opposition to the application.
Mr. Nippel addressed the Committee advising that the problem arose because he measured the distance
from the back wall of his house to the fence. He had assumed, after discussion with his neighbour, that the
fence had been erected on the property line. When questioned by the Committee, Mr. Nippel advised that
the shape and size of the addition is the same as when he applied to the Committee of Adjustment last Fall
and nothing has changed in that regard. Further, the addition has not yet been constructed.
Moved by Mr. A. Galloway
Seconded by Mr. S. Kay
That the application of Bill Nippel requesting permission to construct a rear addition onto his existing
residence, measuring 6.71 m (22 ft.) by 7.32 m (24 ft.) with a rearyard of 4.58 m (15 ft.) rather than the
required 7.62 m (25 ft.) on Lot 27, Registered Plan 1242, 41 Howland Drive, Kitchener, Ontario BE
APPROVED.
It is the opinion of this Committee that:
The variances requested in this application are minor in nature.
This application is desirable for the appropriate development of the property.
The general intent and purpose of the City of Kitchener Zoning By-law and Official Plan are being
maintained on the subject property.
Carried
Submission No. A 16/96 - Ravensbrook Homes (K-W) Ltd., 4243-C
Dundas Street West, Ste. 405, Etobicoke, Ontario
Re:
Part Lot 14, Registered Plan 1799, 61 Briarfield Street, Kitchener, Ontario.
Mr. W. Dahms declared a conflict of interest in this application, as his law firm acts for the mortgagee, and
did not participate in any discussion or voting with respect to this application.
APPEARANCES:
IN SUPPORT:
Mr. R. Muszynski
c/o Ravensbrook Homes (K-W) Ltd.
4243-C Dundas Street West
Suite 405
Etobicoke, Ontario
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT 70 APRIL 16, 1996
CONTRA: NONE
Submission No. A 16/96 - Ravensbrook Homes (K-W) Ltd. - cont'd
WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS:
IN SUPPORT: NONE
CONTRA: NONE
The Committee was advised that the applicant is requesting permission to locate the driveway for this
property at a distance of 10.6 m (34.78 ft.) from the intersection of Briarfield Street and Idle Creek Drive.
The by-law requires driveways to be located a minimum of 12 m (39.37 ft.) from an intersection.
The Committee reviewed the comments of the Department of Planning and Development, in which they
advised that the applicant is requesting a 10.60 metre set back for an access driveway to a proposed single
detached dwelling whereas the by-law requires a minimum set back of 12.0 metres from an intersection to
the driveway. The subject property is located on a corner lot which is bounded by streets on three sides; on
the north by Briarfield Street, on the south by Fairway Road and on the east by Idle Creek Drive. Fairway
Road functions as an arterial road with restricted access and Idle Creek Drive functions as a collector road.
The zoning by-law requires larger lot widths on corner properties to provide the same building envelope on
corner lots as interior lots. The existing lot was designed to house a semi-detached dwelling whereas the
applicant now wishes to divide the lot by part lot control and develop two single detached dwellings. As a
result the driveway off of Briarfield Street would be 1.4 metres short of the required 12 metre setback from
Idle Creek Drive. The 12.0 metre driveway setback is required for corner lots that abut streets with a right-
of-way of 18 metres or more. The driveway setback for corner lots which abut streets with rights-of-way less
than 18 metres, is 9.0 metres.
Staff are not generally supportive of reductions in the setback for driveway locations on corner lots if the
minimum 12.0 metres can be achieved. However, in this particular situation it is undesirable to locate a
driveway off of Idle Creek Drive due to anticipated traffic flows. The proposed 10.6 metre setback should
provide an adequate distance for vehicular safety. The variance is considered minor in nature and meets
the general intent of the zoning by-law.
The variance would allow for the lands to be developed with two single detached dwellings. This is
desirable for the appropriate development of the subject lands as the small-lot singles are similar in scale to
the originally intended development of a semi-detached dwelling.
In view of the foregoing, the Department of Planning and Development recommends approval of variance
application A 16/96 subject to the variance applying only to a single detached dwelling.
The Committee noted the comments of the Director of Building & Inspections in which they advised that they
have no concerns or comments with respect to this Submission.
The Committee noted the comments of Mr. K. Mayer, Traffic Analyst, Traffic & Parking Division, in which he
advised that while the Division is generally opposed to driveways being located less than 12.2 m from
intersecting roads, there are several conditions, specific to this application, which would qualify an
exemption. It would be less desirable to relocate the driveway to Idle Creek Drive in terms of proximity to the
Fairway Road intersection. This proposed driveway location would likely have less traffic operating
implications.
The Chairman questioned whether this difficulty had arisen because this property will now be developed
with a single family dwelling rather than a semi-detached dwelling, as a sideyard must now be provided. Mr.
Muszynski advised that there still may have been a minor difficulty putting a driveway in for a semi-detached
dwelling on this lot.
Moved by Mr. D. McKnight
Seconded by Mr. S. Kay
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT 71 APRIL 16, 1996
2. Submission No. A 16/96 - Ravensbrook Homes (K-W) Ltd. - cont'd
That the application of Ravensbrook Homes (K-W) Ltd. requesting permission to locate the driveway for this
property at a distance of 10.6 m (34.78 ft.) from the intersection of Briarfield Street and Idle Creek Drive
rather than the required of 12 m (39.37 ft.) on Part Lot 14, Registered Plan 1799, 61 Briarfield Street,
Kitchener, Ontario BE APPROVED, subject to the following condition:
1. That the variance as approved in this application shall be applicable only so long as the property
is developed with a single family dwelling.
It is the opinion of this Committee that:
1. The variances requested in this application are minor in nature.
2. This application is desirable for the appropriate development of the property.
3. The general intent and purpose of the City of Kitchener Zoning By-law and Official Plan are being
maintained on the subject property.
Carried
CHANGE OF CONDITIONS
APPLICATIONS
Submission No. C 1/96 - James Mosgrove, 56 Sherwood Avenue, Kitchener,
Ontario
Re:
Parts of Block B, Registered Plan 886, Parts of Lot 22, Registered Plan 384 and Parts of Block
38, Registered Plan 791,480 Ottawa Street South, Kitchener, Ontario.
APPEARANCES:
IN SUPPORT:
Mr. G. Ulmer
330 Trillium Drive
Unit A
Kitchener, Ontario
CONTRA: NONE
WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS:
IN SUPPORT: NONE
CONTRA: NONE
The Committee was advised that the applicant is requesting permission for a change in conditions imposed
by the Committee of Adjustment in granting Submission No.'s B 25/95 & B 26/95. Specifically, the applicant
is requesting permission to change condition numbers 6, 7 and 8 for Submission No. B 25/95 and condition
number 6 for Submission No. B 26/95.
The Committee noted the comments of the Department of Planning & Development in which they advised
that the subject applications B-25/95 and B-26/95 were approved by the Committee of Adjustment at its
meeting of April 11, 1995. Within the last two months the applicant and Planning Department have
discussed the conditions of approval relative to the above noted consent applications. It has been
determined that some of the conditions of approval require physical works to be completed within the one
year period. Given the nature and extent of works for extending services, sidewalks, driveway ramps and
dedication of lands, staff have determined that to satisfy these conditions, would be onerous and therefore,
propose to change conditions of approval to require financial securities instead of physical site works. In
consultation with the applicant, staff recommend additional changes to clarify and correct certain other
requirements. As such, the application is amended.
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT 72 APRIL 16, 1996
Submission No. C 1/96 - James Mosqrove - cont'd
The proposal is for the development of two lots which will front on Donley Street. Specifically, B-25/95,
proposes a lot width of 15 metres (50 ft) by a lot depth of 30.2 metres (105 ft) and B-26/95 proposes a lot of
the same dimensions. Both lots have an area of 486.4m2 (5,236.5 ft2). Application B-26/95 applies to land
located at the current terminus of Donley Street, being the most south-westerly lot proposed along Donley
Street.
Consent B-27/95 was part of the original three submissions for the severance of the subject lands currently
addressed as 480 Ottawa Street South B-27/95 is not subject to this application as the applicants intend to
satisfy the conditions within the one year period of its approval.
The conditions which were approved by the Committee of Adjustment previously for application B-25/95 and
B-26/95 which would remain unchanged are as follows: Conditions 1, 2, 4, 5 of B-25/95 and Conditions 1,
2, 4, 5 of B-26/95.
It is the opinion of the Department of Planning and Development that the revised conditions appropriately
reflect the timing of satisfying conditions for the proposed severance applications and the Department has
no concerns with the application as detailed herein.
That Provisional Consent Application C-1/96, as amended, be approved in accordance with the following
conditions.
The following represents changes to the conditions of approval for submission B-25/95
Condition 3 (revised)
That the owner shall post a letter of credit or other suitable financial security with the City, satisfactory to the
Department of Public Works and City Solicitor, in the amount of 100% of the cost to install, to City
standards, the boulevard landscaping including street trees and paved driveway ramps on the severed
lands. Said security to be held by the City until such time as the works have been completed by the owner
to satisfaction of the General Manager of Public Works.
Condition 6
Delete.
Condition 7
Delete.
Condition 8 (revised)
That the applicant make satisfactory financial arrangements with the City's Department of Public Works for
the City to extend all required services, including storm sewer, water and sanitary sewer at the owner's
expense, from the present terminus on Donley Street to the south-west property line of the proposed
severed lands, including the full restoration of the existing carriage way to a standard satisfactory to the
Department of Public Works.
Condition 9 (revised)
The applicant shall make satisfactory financial arrangements with the City's Department of Public Works for
the City to extend the 1.5 metre wide concrete sidewalk along Donley Street to the satisfaction of the
General Manager of Public Works.
The following represents changes to the conditions of approval for submission
B-26/95.
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT 73 APRIL 16, 1996
Submission No. C 1/96 - James Mosqrove - cont'd
Condition 3 (revised)
That the owner shall post a letter of credit or other suitable financial security with the City, satisfactory to the
Department of Public Works and City Solicitor, in the amount of 100% of the cost to install, to City
standards, the boulevard landscaping including street trees and paved driveway ramps on the severed
lands. Said security to be held by the City until such time as the works have been completed by the owner
to satisfaction of the General Manager of Public Works.
Condition 6 (revised)
That the applicant make satisfactory financial arrangements with the City's Department of Public Works for
the City to extend all required services, including storm sewer, water and sanitary sewer at the owners
expense, from the present terminus on Donley Street to the south-west property line of the proposed
severed lands, including the full restoration of the existing carriage-way to a standard satisfactory to the
Department of Public Works.
Condition 7 (revised)
That the owner shall make satisfactory financial arrangements with the City's Department of Public Works
for the City to install a 1.5 metre wide concrete sidewalk from its terminus at the south-east lot line of the
severed lands to the south-west lot line of the proposed severed lands.
Condition 8 (new)
That Parts 3 and 4 of Reference Plan 58R-7477 shall be conveyed to the City of Kitchener, without cost and
free of encumbrance for road widening purposes.
Condition 9 (new)
That the owners shall convey to the City of Kitchener without cost and free of encumbrance a 0.3 metre (1 ft)
reserve along the south-west limit of Parts 3 and 4 of Reference Plan 58R-7477.
The Committee noted the comments of the Department of Planning & Culture for the Region of Waterloo in
which they advised that they have no objection to this application.
At the request of Mr. Ulmer, the Committee agreed to consider an amendment to the application as
contained in the Department of Planning & Development comments.
Moved by Mr. A. Galloway
Seconded by Mr. W. Dahms
That the application of James Mosgrove requesting permission to change conditions of Provision Consent
Submission No. B 25/95 BE GRANTED, so that only the following conditions shall apply to Submission No.
B 25/95:
That the applicant shall agree with the Regional Municipality of Waterloo that development of the
retained lot will requiring the submission of a Lot Grading and Drainage Control Plan. (Same)
That the applicant shall make satisfactory financial arrangements with the City's Department of
Public Works for the installation of all new service connections to the severed lands. (Same)
That the owner shall post a letter of credit or other suitable financial security with the City,
satisfactory to the Department of Public Works and the City Solicitor, in the amount of 100% of
the cost to install, to City standards, the boulevard landscaping including street trees and paved
driveway ramps on the severed lands. Said security to be held by the City until such time as the
works have been completed by the owner to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Public
Works. (Revised)
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT 74 APRIL 16, 1996
Submission No. C 1/96 - James Mosqrove - cont'd
That the applicant shall pay to the City of Kitchener as cash-in-lieu of parkland dedication equal
to 5% of the value of the lands to be severed. (Same)
That the applicant shall make arrangements to the satisfaction of the City's Commissioner of
Finance for the payment of any outstanding municipal property taxes and/or local improvement
charges. (Same)
Deleted
Deleted
That the applicant shall make satisfactory financial arrangements with the City's Department of
Pubic Works for the City to extend all required services including storm sewer, water and sanitary
sewer, at the owner's expense, from the present terminus on Donely Street to the South-west
property line of the proposed severed lands, including the full restoration of the existing carriage
way to a standard satisfactory to the Department of Public Works. (Revised)
That the applicant shall make satisfactory financial arrangements with the City's Department of
Public Works for the City to extend the 1.5 m wide concrete sidewalk along Donely Street to the
satisfaction of the General Manager of Public Works. (Revised)
- and further -
That the application of James Mosgrove requesting permission to change the conditions of a Provisional
Consent, Submission No. B 26/95 BE GRANTED so that only the following conditions shall apply to
Submission No. B 26/95:
That the applicant shall agree with the Regional Municipality of Waterloo that development of the
retained lot will require the submission of a lot grading and drainage control plan. (Same)
That the applicant shall make satisfactory financial arrangements with the City's Department of
Public Works for the installation of all new service connections to the severed lands. (Same)
That the owner shall post a letter of credit or other suitable financial security with the City,
satisfactory to the Department of Public Works and City Solicitor in the amount of 100% of the
cost to install, to City standards, the boulevard landscaping including street trees and paved
driveway ramps on the severed lands. Said security to be held by the City until such time as the
works have been completed by the owner to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Public
Works. (Revised)
That the applicant shall pay to the City of Kitchener a cash-in-lieu of parkland dedication equal to
5% of the value of the lands to be severed. (Same)
That the applicant shall make arrangements to the satisfaction of the City's Commissioner of
Finance for the payment of any outstanding municipal property taxes and/or local improvement
charges. (Same)
That the applicant shall make satisfactory financial arrangements with the City's Department of
Public Works for the City to extend all required services, including storm sewer, water and
sanitary sewer, at the owners expense, from the present terminus on Donely Street to the South-
west property line of the proposed severed lands, including the full restoration of the existing
carriage way to a standard satisfactory to the Department of Public Works. (Revised)
That the owner shall make satisfactory financial arrangements with the City's Department of
Public Works for the City to install a 1.5 m wide concrete sidewalk from its terminus at the south-
east lot line of the severed lands to the south-west lot line of the proposed severed lands.
(Revised
Submission No. C 1/96 - James Mosqrove - cont'd
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT 75 APRIL 16, 1996
That Parts 3 and 4 of Reference 58R-7477 shall be conveyed to the City of Kitchener, without
cost and free of encumbrance, for road widening purposes. (New)
That the owners shall convey to the City of Kitchener without cost and free of encumbrance a 0.3
m (1 foot) reserve along the southwest limits of Parts 3 & 4, Reference Plan 58R-7477. (New)
Pursuant to Subsection 53 (41) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, as amended, the applicant shall fulfil the
above-noted conditions within one year of the date of giving notice of this decision.
It is the opinion of this Committee that:
The requirements of the Zoning By-law are being maintained.
The use of the land in this application conforms to the City of Kitchener Official Plan and the
Regional Official Policies Plan.
Carried
ADJOURNED
On Motion, the meeting adjourned.
Dated at the City of Kitchener this 16th, day of April 1996.
D. H. Gilchrist
Secretary-Treasurer
Committee of Adjustment