HomeMy WebLinkAboutDSD-2021-59 - A 2021-028 - 11 Springdale Drive
REPORT TO: Committee of Adjustment
DATE OF MEETING: April 20, 2021
SUBMITTED BY: von Westerholt, Juliane, Senior Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7157
PREPARED BY: Rice Menezes, Sheryl, Planning Technician (Zoning),
519-741-2200 ext. 7844
WARD(S) INVOLVED: 1
DATE OF REPORT: April 12, 2021
REPORT NO.: DSD 2021-59
SUBJECT: Minor Variance Application A2021-028
11 Springdale Drive
Owner Ilsedore Kautsky
RECOMMENDATION:
That application A2021-028 requesting permission to have a home business (office for online
sales) with one employee in an existing single detached dwelling to have 2 separately
accessible off-street parking spaces rather than the required 3 separate off-street parking
spaces, be approved, subject to the following conditions:
1) A Zoning (Occupancy) Certificate is obtained from the Planning Division; and,
2) That condition 1 above be completed by June 1, 2021. Any request for a time
extension must be approved in writing by the Manager of Development Review (or
designate) prior to completion date set out in this decision. Failure to complete
the conditions will result in this approval becoming null and void.
Clarification: staff notes that the advertisement for this property stated that the Bylaw does not permit
off-site employees for a home business. However, the Zoning Bylaw does permit a home business
to have up to one employee provided parking regulations are met. One parking space is required
for the dwelling, one parking spaces is required for the home business and one parking space is
required for the employee. All three parking spaces must be independently accessible. This is not
possible on this property without widening the driveway, which the owner does not want to do. A
double wide driveway exists and is to remain and therefore, the variance is regarding the parking
requirement for the home business.
*** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. ***
Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance.
BACKGROUND:
The property is designated as Low Rise Residential in as
Community Area on the Urban Structure Map.
The property is zoned Residential Three (R-3) in By-law 85-1.
Location Map
REPORT:
Planning Comments:
In considering the four tests for minor variances as outlined in Section 45(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O.,
1990 Chap. P. 13, as amended, Planning staff offers the following comments:
General Intent of the Official Plan
The intent of the Low Rise Residential designation is to accommodate a full range of housing types to
achieve an overall low intensity of use. A single detached dwelling with a home business with one
employee on-site but with no clients coming to the premises continues to meet this intent of the Official
Plan and is appropriate for the subject property. Therefore, Planning staff is of the opinion that the
general intent of the Official Plan is maintained.
Photo of Subject Property
General Intent of the Zoning By-law
The intent of the regulation to require three separately accessible parking spaces for a home business
when there is a maximum of one on-site employee, is to ensure that there is sufficient parking for the
business owner (occupant of the home); clients and the employee. The subject home business
operates as an online retail business for the sales of flags. The agent has advised that clients do not
come directly to the property. Orders of the product are couriered or delivered. Therefore, there is no
need to have three separate parking spaces. As well, the employee lives on the same street and walks
to the subject property and therefore does not require a parking space. Based on the above, staff is of
the opinion that the general intent of the zoning by-law is met.
Is the Variance Minor?
As noted above, the proposed home business will have sufficient parking available for the business
owner and the one on-site employee. The variance can be considered minor.
Is the Variance Appropriate?
Based on above comments, staff is of the opinion that as the proposed use will not negatively impact
the subject property nor the surrounding neighbourhood; and that the variance is appropriate.
City Planning staff conducted a site inspection of the property on April 12, 2021.
Building Comments:
The Building Division has no objections to the proposed variance.
Transportation Comments:
The application notes, one employee will walk to their place of employment and there will be no
clients arriving on-site, therefore, Transportation Services can support the requested parking
variance from 3 to 2 on-site parking spaces.
Engineering Comments:
If a driveway widening is considered in the future, a curb cut/driveway widening permit may be
required.
Environmental Planning: No concerns due to nature of application.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
This report supports the delivery of core services.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Capital Budget The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget.
Operating Budget The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget.
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT:
INFORM
Committee of Adjustment meeting. A notice signed was placed on the property advising that a
Committee of Adjustment application has been received. The sign advises interested parties to find
A notice of the
application was mailed to all property owners within 30 metres of the subject property.
PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES:
There are no previous reports/authorities related to this matter.
April 07, 2021
Holly Dyson
City of Kitchener File No.: D20-20/
200 King Street West VAR KIT GEN
P.O. Box 1118 (6) 53 COURTLAND, 80 COURTLAND AVENUE
Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7 EAST 2441912 ONTARIO INC.
(9) 53 FAIRWAY, SEC WOOLNER TRAIL AND
FAIRWAY ROAD NORTH WCDSB
Dear Ms. Dyson:
Re: Committee of Adjustment Applications Meeting April 22, 2021, City of Kitchener
Regional staff has reviewed the following Committee of Adjustment applications and have
following updated comments:
1) A 2021-019 30 Waterbow Trail No Concerns.
2) A 2021-026 11 Whitney Place No Concerns.
3) A 2021-027 573 Guelph Street No Concerns.
4) A 2021-028 11 Springdale Drive No Concerns.
5) A 2021-029 20 Munroe Street No Concerns.
6) A 2021-030 80 Courtland Avenue East No Concerns.
7) A 2021-031 660 Avondale Avenue No Concerns.
8) A 2021-032 81 Waterloo Street No Concerns.
9) A 2021-033 Fairway & Woolner No Concerns.
10) A 2021-034 59 Carisbrook Drive No Concerns.
Please be advised that any development on the lands subject to the Applications noted above
are subject to the provisions of the Regional Development Charge By-law 14-046 or any
successor thereof and may require the payment of Regional Development Charges for these
5ƚĭǒƒĻƓƷ bǒƒĬĻƩʹ ЌЏЊЏЎВЉ
tğŭĻ ƚŅ Ћ
developments prior to the issuance of a building permit. The comments contained in this letter
pertain to the Application numbers listed above. If a site is subject to more than one application,
additional comments may apply.
Please forward any decision on the above mentioned application to the undersigned.
Yours Truly,
Joginder Bhatia
Transportation Planner
C (226) 753-0368
2
Docs #3573963
April 8, 2021
Dianna Saunderson Via email only
City of Kitchener
200 King StreetWest
Kitchener, ON, N2G 4G7
Dear Ms. Saunderson,
Re:April 20,2021Committee of Adjustment Meeting
______________________________________________________________________
Applications for Minor Variance
A2021-01930 Waterbow Trail
A2021-02611Whitney Place
A2021-027573Guelph Street
A2021-02811Springdale Drive
A2021-02920Munroe Street
A2021-03080Courtland Avenue East
A2021-031660Avondale Avenue
A2021-03281Waterloo Street
Applications for Consent
B2021-01583Elmsdale Drive
B2021-01683Second Avenue
B2021-01782Pattandon Avenue
B2021-018-020942Doon Village Road
B2021-021-023654Rockway Drive
The above-noted consent applications are located outside the Grand River Conservation
Authority areas of interest. As such, we will not undertake a review of the applications and
plan review fees will not be required. If you have any questions or require additional
information, please contact me at 519-621-2763 ext. 2228 or aherreman@grandriver.ca.
Sincerely,
Andrew Herreman, CPT
Resource Planning Technician
Grand River Conservation Authority
*These comments are respectfully submitted as advice and reflect resource concerns within the scope and mandate of Page 1of 1
the Grand River Conservation Authority.