HomeMy WebLinkAboutDSD-2021-61 - Addendum Heritage Permit Application HPA-2021-IV-012 - 171 Frederick StreetREPORT TO:Heritage Kitchener
DATE OF MEETING:May 4, 2021
SUBMITTED BY:Bustamante, Rosa,Director of Planning,519-741-2200 ext. 7319
PREPARED BY:Drake, Michelle, Heritage Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7839
WARD(S) INVOLVED:Ward10
DATE OF REPORT:April 16, 2021
REPORT NO.:DSD-2021-61
SUBJECT:Addendum HPA-2021-IV-012
171 Frederick Street(Suddaby Public School)
Proposed Alterations to the front façade at Suddaby Public School
RECOMMENDATION:
That pursuant to Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Heritage Permit Application
HPA- 2021-IV-012 requesting permission to replace the existing wood windowson the
front façade of 171 Frederick Street (Suddaby Public School) with aluminum clad
wood windowsas outlined in DSD-2021-61, in accordance with specifications
described in the followingdocuments: (a) the application form and drawings dated
February 26, 2021as contained in Appendix A; (b) the slide deck from the
presentation to Heritage Kitchenerdated April 6, 2021as containedin Appendix B;
and, (c) the email providing information to complete the application dated April 13,
2021as contained in Appendix C, BE APPROVED, subject to the following conditions:
i)That documentation in the form of current photographs and measured
drawings be prepared and submitted for each individual window on the
front elevation prior to the removal of any windows;
ii)That a full-scalesample window be produced for review on site by Heritage
Planning staff and related heritage clearanceissuedby staff to proceed
prior to the removal of any windows;
iii)That the final shop drawings for the windows be submitted for review and
heritage clearanceissuedby staff to proceed prior to the installation of any
windows; and further,
ndrd
iv)That one sample window on the 2or 3floor be installed for heritage
clearance by staff prior to proceeding with the installation of the remaining
windows.
BACKGROUND:
The Development Services Department is in receipt of acompleteHeritage Permit
Application HPA-2021-IV-012, which is seeking permission to replace the original wood
windows with new aluminum clad wood windows on the property municipally addressed as
*** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. ***
Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance.
2 - 1
171 Frederick Street (commonly known as Suddaby Public School). The request relates to
the pandemic and the need to address ventilation concerns in the school. Fundingthrough
the Federal Investing in Canada Infrastructure Programis availableunder the Province’s
COVID-19 Resilience Infrastructure Stream: Education Related Projectsto assist with the
window replacement program. The Waterloo Region District School Board is eager to move
forward to tender this spring, startreplacementsthissummer and finishby September 2021
in time for the new school year. In the interestof time and moving the proposal forward,
Heritage Kitchener hadthe opportunity to review the incomplete application and provide
th
comments at the April 6committee meetingfor the applicant to consider in finalizing their
submission.
REPORT:
The subject property is located on the south side of Frederick Street between Irwin Street
and Lancaster Street East in the Central Frederick planning community. The property is
designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act.Originally known as Central School
when it opened on this site in 1857, the school was the first permanent common (public)
school in the Town of Berlin. The school was renamed after long-time principal Jeremiah
Suddaby.
Location Map 1: 171 Frederick Street (Suddaby Public School)
2 - 2
Designating By-law 1980—216 describes the reasons for designation and identifies the
primary heritage attributes as the façade of Suddaby Public School. As a result, a Heritage
Permit Application is required to alter the exterior of the building.
Description of Proposal
The application form outlines a proposal to replace approximately 85 of the inoperable single
hung wood windows on the front facade with new single hung aluminum clad wood windows.
A set of drawings was submitted as supporting information. The drawings were issued for
heritage approval by aba architects inc. dated February 26, 2021. The proposed aluminum
clad wood windows will offer the look of real wood on the interior but provide the durability
of aluminum on the exterior.
Photograph: Front Façade of Suddaby Public School (171 Frederick Street) (A. Clark, 2021)
Current Condition of the Front Façade (Frederick Street) Windows
The windows on the first and second floor of the school are original true divided lite (TDL)
single hung, single glazed wood windowswith a muntin width ranging from 5/8” to 3/4” and
depth of 3/8”. The basement windows were replaced approximately 25 years ago. Allthe
windows have deteriorated over time due to weathering, vandalism,and poorly executed
repairs. All window frames are in poor condition with the majority being warped with broken
seals. Signs of rot and general decay are visible on both the exterior and interior.About 10%
of the windowpanes have been replaced with plexiglass. The large size (36” wide by 106”
2 - 3
high) and weight of the windows is not user friendly and poses a safety hazard to users.
Further, not all windows are operable due to warped frames, broken opening mechanisms,
and/or being painted shut.
Review of Window Replacement Options
The owner has shared that they reviewed sixwindow products. The Ridley Windows &
Doors Norwood NORCLAD windows were chosen as they best suite the owner’s needsin
terms of price, availability, and ease of maintenance. Basic information on the other five
window products is outlined below:
Two window products can not be made large enough – Golden Windows & JeldWen
(JeldWen can’t closely match the architectural details)
Two window products are American made with a delivery and cost premium – CR
Pacific and Pella (Pella only has one muntin type, which isn’t a close match)
One window product is almost identical in details and design to the Norwood
NORCLAD product (Both are Canadian made) – LePage Double XL
Aluminum Clad Wood Windows versus Wood Windows
The applicant has outlined several advantages to using aluminum clad wood windows. The
extruded aluminum provides long-lasting colour and performance, low maintenance and
great weather resistance, and higher U-Values and less susceptible to water damage and
decay. The wood will maintain its appearance during temperature changes, provide
insulation, contribute to a warm and natural look on the interior, and allow for the duplication
of the existing wood windows on the interior.
Conversely, the owner has outlined their reasons for not replacing with wood windows. In
their opinion, wood windows would not provide the required thermal performance, user
friendly operation and low maintenance product. The owner also shared that they did not
consider a true divided lite (TDL) window because it is more expensive than a simulated
divided lite (SDL)window, and the aluminum clad wood window is not available from any
manufacturer as a true divided lite (TDL)window.
Based on the review of different window products, the owner determined that the proposed
aluminum clad wood window would be best suited based on the following criteria: low
maintenance, consistent exterior finish that matches the original windows, wood look from
interior spaces, high thermal performance, 30-50 year life expectancy, and easily operable.
Ridley Windows & Doors Norwood NORCLAD 500 Series Hung Clad Series
The applicant is proposing a window produced by Ridley Windows and Doors from their
Norwood NORCLAD series. The proposed replacements would be aluminum clad wood
windows with simulated divided lights (SDL) with both exterior and interior 5/8” profiles.
These profiles will not be an exact replica of the original but will be close.
AdditionalWork (Replacements and Repairs)
Along with the replacement of windows, the wood details around the existing windows will
need to be sanded and/or stripped of paint (where required), wood replaced (where
required), and repainted to match. All sealants willbe removed, including oil based and
asbestos containing caulking, and replaced with new latex-basedsealants. The current
aluminum infill panels are warped and separating from their backing. These panels will be
2 - 4
replaced withnew colour matched aluminum panels. This work would also involve removing
and restoring the wood molding around the new panels.
Any other replacements or repairs to the front façadenot outlined in this report and its
recommendationrequire consultation with heritage planning staff and may require a
Heritage Permit Application.
Heritage Planning Comments
In reviewing the merits of the application, heritage planning staff note the following:
The property is designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act.
A heritage permit application is required to make alterations to the exterior of the
building.
The windows form a significant portion of the front elevation of the building, and the
façade is identified as a heritage attribute.
The building contributes to a terminating vista at the end of Otto Street.
The school is a local landmark.
The first and second floor windows are original while the basement windows were
replaced approximately 25 years ago.
Allofthe existing windows are in poor condition.
Documentation of each individual window has not been submitted.
A brief review of other window products was completed.
Cost, ease of maintenance and energy efficiency are important considerations in the
selection of window replacements; however, the appearance of the replacement
windows and the degree to which they respect and complement the architectural
integrity and character of the building are of considerable cultural heritage interest.
The ideal window replacement alternative would match each individual original
window in terms of material, design, proportion, operation, colour, detail, etc.
The proposed Norwood NORCLAD product is described as a simulated divided lite
(SDL), single hung, aluminum clad wood window featuring a similar design,
proportion and detail and matching operation and colour; however, a full scale sample
window has not been provided for verification on site.
The existing aluminum infill panels areto be removed and replaced with new to match
existing, including removing and restoring the wood molding around the new panels.
Based on the above, heritage planning staff recommend that HPA-2021-IV-012 BE
APPROVED subject to conditions that address documentation, verification that the
proposed window is a reasonably close match to the original windows, submission of the
final shop drawings, and installation of one sample aluminum clad wood window.
In accordance with the Heritage Permit Application form, the approval of an application
under the Ontario Heritage Act shall not be a waiver of any of the provisions of any by-law
of the City of Kitchener or legislation, including but not limited to, the requirements of the
Ontario Building Code and the City’s Zoning By-law.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
This report supports the delivery of core services.
2 - 5
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Capital Budget – The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget.
Operating Budget – The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget.
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT:
INFORM – This report has been posted to the City’s website with the agenda in advance of
the Heritage Kitchenercommittee meeting.
PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES:
DSD-21-035Heritage Permit Application HPA-2021-IV-012, 171 Frederick Street,
Proposed alterations to the front façade at Suddaby Public School
CSD-16-028Heritage Permit Application HPA-2016-IV-028, 171 Frederick Street,
Window and door replacement (rear and rear sides of building)
Ontario Heritage Act, 2019
APPROVEDBY: Justin Readman, General Manager, Development Services
APPENDICES:
APPENDIXA– Heritage Permit Application HPA-2021-IV-012
th
APPENDIXB– April 6Heritage Kitchener presentation slides
th
APPENDIXC– April 13email with required information to complete the HPA
2 - 6
HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION &
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
th
Planning Division –200 King Street West, 6Floor
P.O. Box 1118, Kitchener ON N2G 4G7
519-741-2426; planning@kitchener.ca
STAFF USE ONLY
Date Received:Accepted By:Application Number:
HPA-2021-
PART B: HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
1.NATURE OF APPLICATION
ExteriorInteriorSignage
DemolitionNew ConstructionAlterationRelocation
2.SUBJECT PROPERTY
282!Gsfefsjdl!Tu/!Ljudifofs-!PO
Municipal Address:
Legal Description (if know):
Building/Structure Type:ResidentialCommercialIndustrialInstitutional
Heritage Designation:Part IV (Individual)Part V (Heritage Conservation District)
Is the property subject to a Heritage Easement or Agreement?YesNo
3.PROPERTY OWNER
Xbufsmpp!Sfhjpo!Ejtusjdu!Tdippm!Cpbse
Name:
62!Bsefmu!Bwf/
Address:
Ljudifofs-!PO!O3D!3S6
City/Province/Postal Code:
62:/612/2:76
Phone:
ebmf`xjefnboAxsetc/db
Email:
4.AGENT (if applicable)
Kpti!Cfebse
Name:
BCB!Bsdijufdut!Jod/
Company:
212!Sboebmm!Esjwf-!Voju!C
Address:
Xbufsmpp-!PO!O3W!2D6
City/Province/Postal Code:
62:/995/3822!y336
Phone:
kcfebseAbcbsdijufdu/db
Email:
2021 City of Kitchener – Heritage Permit Application &Submission RequirementsPage 7 of 9
2 - 7
5.WRITTEN DESCRIPTION
Provide a written description of the project including any conservation methods proposed. Provide such detail
as materials to be used, measurements, paint colours, decorative details, whether any original building fabric
is to be removed or replaced, etc. Use additional pages as required. Please refer to the City of Kitchener
Heritage Permit Application Submission Guidelines for further direction.
Up!ifmq!xjui!uif!obuvsbm!wfoujmbujpo!pg!uif!tdippm!uif!jopqfsbcmf!tjohmf!ivoh!xppe!xjoepxt!bsf
cfjoh!sfqmbdfe!xjui!ofx!xppe!bmvnjovn!dmbe!tjohmf!ivoh!xjoepxt/
6.REVIEW OF CITY OF KITCHENER HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMISSION GUIDELINES
Describe why it is necessary to undertake the proposed work:
Fyjtujoh!xppe!xjoepxt!bsf!jopqfsbcmf!evf!up!tj{f!boe!xfjhiu/!Jo!sftqpotf!up!uif!dvssfou
qboefnjd!boe!bwbjmbcmf!gvoejoh!uif!XSETC!xjtift!up!sfqmbdf!uiftf!xjepxt!xjui!ofx!pqfsbcmf
xjoepxt!up!ifmq!xjui!cfuufs!wfoujmbujpo/
Describe how the proposal is consistent with the Part IV individual designating by-law or the Part V Heritage
Conservation District Plan:
Uijt!qspqptbm!jt!dpotjtufou!xjui!Qbsu!JW!pg!uif!Ifsjubhf!bdu!bt!ju!bjnt!up!sfqmbdf!uif!xjoepxt!xjui
xjui!xppe!bmvnjovn!dmbe!xjoepxt!uibu!nbudi!uif!dibsbdufsjtujdt!pg!uif!fyjtujoh!xjoepxt!po!uif
Wjdupsjb!Tusffu!gbdbef/
Describe how the proposal is consistent with Parks Canada’sStandards and Guidelines for the
Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (www.historicplaces.ca/en/pages/standards-normes.aspx):
Uif!dibsbdufs!efgjojoh!fmfnfout!pg!uif!fyjtujoh!xjoepxt!bsf!cfjoh!nbudife!xjui!ofx!xjoepxt
uibu!bsf!cfjoh!qspqptfe!up!sfqmbdf!uifn/
7.PROPOSED WORKS
Bvhvtu0!Tfqu/!3132
Kvof0Kvmz!3132
a)Expected start date:Expected completion date:
b)Have you discussed this work with Heritage Planning Staff?YesNo
Wjdupsjb!Hspio
- If yes, who did you speak to?
c) Have you discussed this work with Building Division Staff? YesNo
- If yes, who did you speak to?
d)Have you applied for a Building Permit for this work? YesNo
e)Other related Building or Planning applications:Application number
5.ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The undersigned acknowledges that all of the statements contained in documents filed in support of this
application shall be deemed part of this application. The undersigned acknowledges that receipt of this
application by the City of Kitchener - Planning Division does not guarantee it to be a ‘complete’ application.
Theundersigned acknowledges that the Council of the City of Kitchener shall determine whether the
information submitted forms a complete application. Further review of the application will be undertaken and
the owner or agent may be contacted to provide additional information and/or resolve any discrepancies or
issues with the application as submitted. Once the application is deemed to be fully complete, the application
will be processed and, if necessary, scheduled for the next available HeritageKitchener committee and
Council meeting. Submission ofthis application constitutesconsentforauthorized municipal staff to enter
upon the subject property for the purpose of conducting site visits, including taking photographs, which are
2021 City of Kitchener – Heritage Permit Application &Submission RequirementsPage 8 of 9
2 - 8
necessaryfor the evaluation of this application. The undersigned acknowledges that where an agent has
been identified, the municipality is authorized but not required to contact this person in lieu of the owner and
this person is authorized to act on behalf of theowner for all matters respecting the application. The
undersigned agrees that the proposed work shall be done in accordance with this application and
understands that the approval of this application under the Ontario Heritage Actshall not be a waiver ofany
of the provisions of any by-law of the City of Kitchener or legislation including but not limited to the
requirements of the Building Code and the Zoning By-law. The undersigned acknowledges that in the event
this application is approved, any departure from the conditions imposed by the Council of the City of Kitchener
or from the plans or specifications approved by the Council of the City of Kitchener is prohibited and could
result in a fine being imposed or imprisonment as provided for under the Ontario Heritage Act.
3132013035
Signature of Owner/Agent:Date:
Signature of Owner/Agent:Date:
6.AUTHORIZATION
If this application is being made by an agent on behalf of the property owner, the following authorization must
be completed:
I / We, , owner of the land that is subject of this application,
hereby authorize to act on my / our behalf in this regard.
Signature of Owner/Agent:Date:
Signature of Owner/Agent:Date:
The personal information on this form is collected under the legal authority of Section 33(2), Section 42(2),
and Section 42(2.2) of the Ontario Heritage Act. The information will be used for the purposes of
administering the Heritage Permit Application and ensuring appropriate service of notice of receipt under
Section 33(3) and Section 42(3) of the Ontario Heritage Act. If you have any questions about this collection
of personal information, please contact the Manager of Corporate Records, Legislated Services Division,
City of Kitchener (519-741-2769).
STAFF USE ONLY
Application Number:
Application Received:
ApplicationComplete:
Notice of Receipt:
Notice of Decision:
90-Day Expiry Date:
PROCESS:
Heritage Planning Staff:
Heritage Kitchener:
Council:
2021 City of Kitchener – Heritage Permit Application &Submission RequirementsPage 9 of 9
2 - 9
2 - 10
2 - 11
2 - 12
2 - 13
2 - 14
2 - 15
2 - 16
2 - 17
2 - 18
2 - 19
2 - 20
2 - 21
¸¸¸¸¸¸
2 - 22
2 - 23
2 - 24
2 - 25
2 - 26
2 - 27
2 - 28
2 - 29