HomeMy WebLinkAboutDSD-2021-63 - Iron Horse Trail Crossings and Cycling Spot FixesREPORT TO:Community and Infrastructure Services Committee
DATE OF MEETING:June 14, 2021
SUBMITTED BY:Cronkite, Barry, Director, Transportation Services, 519-741-2200
ext. 7738
PREPARED BY:Kropf, Darren, Active Transportation Planning Project Manager,
519-741-2200 ext. 7314
WARD(S) INVOLVED:Wards9, 10
DATE OF REPORT:June 3, 2021
REPORT NO.:DSD-2021-63
SUBJECT:Iron Horse Trail crossings andcycling spot fixes
RECOMMENDATION:
That pedestrian crossovers (PXOs) be installed on the Iron Horse Trail at Union
Boulevard, Glasgow Street, Gage Avenue, West Avenue, Mill Street, Madison
Avenue, and Kent Ave; and,
That stopping be prohibited at any time 15 metres from the crossing at each
approach, and ten (10) metres immediately following each crossing; and,
That raised crossings be constructed attheIron Horse Trail at Glasgow Street, Mill
Street, and Madison Avenue;and,
That aprojectbudget of $250,000 be allocated from theremaining Ontario Municipal
Commuter Cycling grant and the Iron Horse Trail improvements accountfor
installation of PXOs and raised crossings on the Iron Horse Trail;andfurther,
That the existing stop controls at Young Street/Ahrens Avenue be reversed to
require eastboundand westboundtraffic on Ahrens Avenue to stopat Young Street
while permitting traffic on Young Street to travel through Ahrens Avenue without
stopping; and,
That the existing stop controls at Chapel Street and Merner Avenue be reversed to
require northboundand southbound traffic on Merner Avenueto stop at Chapel
Streetwhile permitting traffic on ChapelStreet to travel through Merner Avenue
without stopping; and,
That the existing stop controls at ChurchStreet and Cedar Streetbe reversed to
require northboundand southbound traffic on Cedar Streetto stop at Church Street
*** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. ***
Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance.
while permitting traffic on ChurchStreet to travel through Cedar Streetwithout
stopping; andfurther,
That four parking spaces on Francis Street (between Charles Street West and Hall’s
Lane West) berestricted between6:30 to 9:30 a.m.,2:30 to 6:00 p.m.and 10:30 to
11:30 p.m.to permit buslay-by areas until the Regional Transit Hub is operational;
andfurther,
That the Uniform Traffic Bylaw be amended accordingly.
REPORT HIGHLIGHTS:
This report provides proposed improvements on allIron Horse Trail crossingsalong
municipal roadways, including pedestrian crossovers (PXOs), some of which will be
combinedwith refuge islands and/orraised crossings.
Funding for the crossings is accounted for by theremaining funds in the Ontario
Municipal Commuter Cycling grant fundingandIron Horse Trail improvement account.
Community engagement occurred during the Iron Horse Trail Improvement Strategy
(2015)and an open house in 2019. The desire for safer trail crossings was also
identified in consultations forComplete Streets, Cycling and Trails Master Plan and
Vision Zero.The stop sign and parking restrictions are required for implementation of
the Downtown Cycling Grid, which included over 1,200 residents consulted during the
finalphase of community engagement.
This report supports People-friendly Transportation.
BACKGROUND:
The Iron Horse Trail is the city’s busiest trail, with over 250,000 trips a year by pedestrians
and cyclists of all ages andabilities. Guided by the Iron Horse Trail Improvement Strategy
(2015), recent investments in the trail have improved the trail’s function, safety and
comfort, including trail widening, benches, lighting and landscaping.
Continuing with these improvements, city staff is proposing to improve safety and
accessibility at all IronHorse Trail crossingsat municipal roadways,with the installation of
Pedestrian Crossovers (PXOs)and in some casesraised crossings or refuge islands.
This work is a continuation of the Ontario Municipal Commuter Cycling Program. In 2020,
tenders for eligible projects under the Ontario Municipal Commuter Cycling program came
in under budget, leaving $110,000 of grant funding to spend in 2021. Improvements to the
Iron Horse Trail crossings is listed on the city’sOMCC eligible project list.
REPORT:
Iron Horse Trailstreet crossings
The Iron Horse Trail Improvement Strategy included“Recommendation 5.3 Trail Use,
Safety and Accessibility.”Trail crossings werethe top priority identified by the community
to improve trail safety.Further, crossings of a roadway are generally the area of greatest
safety concern for any trail.
Staff’s intent is togrant trail usersthe legal right of wayat all municipal road crossings
along the IronHorse Trail.Additionally, physical design measureshave been included at
major crossingsthat demonstrate trail user priority andimprove accessibility andsafety.
About Pedestrian Crossovers (PXOs)
PXOs provide pedestrians with crossing opportunities by requiring motorists to yield to
pedestrians within the crosswalk.Thepresence of a pedestrian in the crosswalk requires
the driver of a vehicle approaching the crossover tostop before entering the crossover.
Ontario Traffic Manual(OTM)Book 15: Pedestrian Crossing Treatmentsprovides
guidance for the selection and design of PXOs.PXOs are recommended when the
following conditions are met:
100 or more pedestrians observed crossing over an 8-hourperiod;
750 vehicles per 8-hourperiod;
No other controlled crossing within 200 m;
Adherence to Ontario Traffic Manual Book 15 lane configuration and traffic volume
conditions; and
Posted speed limit
It is worth noting that these requirements are subject to an assessment using sound
technical engineering judgement.Further, if the site location is within 200 m of a traffic
control device, a PXO can still be warranted if there is a “requirement for system
connectivity” or the location is “on pedestrian desire lines.” Based on these criteria, city
staff support PXOs at all city-owned crossings.See Attachment A for warrant justification.
The Region of Waterloosupports PXOs on city-owned streets where analysis has found
there will not be concerns with adjacent signal operations.Atthe Region’s request,a
queuing analysis was conducted and the resultsindicate that queuing is not expected to
be an issue, with the exception of GlasgowStreet, where westbound traffic may back up
into the PXO during PM peak hours.Due to this concern, the Region does not support a
PXO at Glasgow Street and notes any future operational concerns because ofthe
proposed PXOwould be the city’s responsibility to address.
There are four types of PXOs, as directed by OTM Book 15. See Attachment Bfor the two
types recommended in this report. The distinguishing feature is Type B includes flashing
beacons –activated by pedestrians with a push button–while Type D does not include
the beacons.Both types grant legal right of way to pedestrians, butthe flashing beacons
are used on higher volume streetsfor greater visibilityand awareness to drivers.
Currently, legislation does not allow the city to provide crossrides at PXOs,meaning
cyclists are to dismount and cross as a pedestrian. Cityof Kitchenerstaff have advocated
alongside othermunicipalities for inclusion of crossridesat PXOs during the update to
OTM Book 18: Cycling Facilitiesin 2019-2021and througha letter to the Ministry of
Transportation sent through theRoad Safety Committee of Ontario(ROSCO) on March
24, 2021.In themeantime, city staff will installthe proposed PXOsin such a waythat
crossridescan be easily installedif future legislation allows.
Physical measures
City staff observationhas found that driver yield compliance at PXOs can be improved
with physical measures such as raised crossings, refuge islands and street narrowing.City
staff intend to continue studying driver compliance at PXOs.In addition to driver yield
compliance, there are additional benefits of raised trail crossings, including greater
visibilityof vulnerable usersandimproved accessibility.
The raised crossings are being designed to remain smooth and flush with the trail, which
greatly improves accessibility of the crossing. Thiswillrequirenew or relocated catch
basins for drainage, which has been accounted for within the overall project scope and
budget.
Breakdown of all city-owned crossings
Street crossingCurrent conditionsProposed improvements
Union BoulevardRefuge islandPXO Type B
Glasgow StreetNo crossing featuresPXO Type Band raised crossing
Gage AvenueNo crossing featuresPXO Type D(In scheduled
reconstruction, consider raised crossing)
West AvenueRefuge islandPXO Type D
Mill StreetNo crossing featuresPXO Type Band raised crossing
Madison AvenueNo crossing featuresPXO Type Dand raised crossing
Palmer AvenueNo crossing featuresYield sign
Kent AvenueNo crossingfeaturesPXO TypeD(In scheduled
reconstruction, consider raised crossing)
The crossings at Victoria Street, Queen Street, Courtland Avenue, Borden Avenue and
Ottawa Street are under the jurisdiction of the Region of Waterloo.Stop signs and “Wait
forGap”signs will be installed on trail approachesto regional roadsso trail users know
they do not have the right of way over vehicles.
In addition, city staff are recommending a new form of vehicle control be
added to trail crossings todeter illegal cars from accessing the trails but
still allow access for maintenance vehicles. These flex stakes are the
same standard as seasonal traffic calming, but with customartwork that
indicates illegalusers (i.e. no cars allowed)and intended users(i.e.
pedestrians and cyclists allowed). These will be installed on all city and
regional street trail crossings, starting with the Iron Horse Trail.
Re-orienting stop signsfor Neighbourhood Bikeways
In DSD-20-203 ProtectedDowntown Cycling Grid, City Council approved neighbourhood
bikeways on Young Street, Chapel Street and Cedar Street. Upon further analysis for
construction this summer, staff recommends switching the orientation of the existing stop
controlat theintersections of Young/Ahrens, Chapel/Merner and Church/Cedar.This is
guidedby OTM Book 18,whichstates: "Priority should be given to people cycling when a
neighbourhood bikeway crosses a minor street, toreduce the travel time for cyclists. It is
desirable to provide a continuous bikeway without stop control for cyclists."
The new stop controlwould:
require eastboundand westboundtraffic on Ahrens Avenue to stop at Young Street
while permitting traffic on Young Street to travel through Ahrens Avenue without
stopping;
require northboundand southbound traffic on Merner Avenueto stop at Chapel
Streetwhile permitting traffic on ChapelStreet to travel through Merner Avenue
without stopping;and
require northboundand southbound traffic on Cedar Streetto stop at Church Street
while permitting traffic on ChurchStreet to travel through Cedar Streetwithout
stopping.
According toOTM Book 5, where right-of-way is being reassigned from onestreetto
another crossing street, through theelimination of an existing stopsign control and the
installation of stopsign controlon the previouslyuncontrolled roadway, an introductory
period isrequired to safely carry out the transition.This includes an all-way stop for 15
days, with warning signage of the upcoming removal of stop signs on the original streets
with stop signs.
Francis Street parking restrictions
In DSD-20-203 Protected Downtown Cycling Grid, City Council approved the conversion
of Joseph Street to one-way operationin order to install new separated bike lanes. While
Joseph Street does not have bus stops, GRT had been using Joseph Street for Route #34
as a turn-around, as well as the loadingbayson Water Street as layby waiting areas. As
an alternative, GRT has requested the use of the parking bay on the east side of Francis
Streetbetween Charles Street and Hall’s Lane, during the times of 6:30 to 9:30 a.m., 2:30
to 6:00 p.m.and 10:30 to 11:30 p.m.These times do not conflict with peak parking
demand for thesespaces and is not expectedto cause parking scarcity, given the parking
bay across the street will remain available for use during the time of restrictions. This
parking restriction is expected to be removed when the King Victoria Transit Hub is in
operation.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
This report supports People-friendly Transportation.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Capital Budget–Thetotal cost of $250,000is accounted for through previously approved
budgets.
UpgradeTotalCostBudget Line
PXOs and raised $240,000OMCC (up to $110,000) &
crossingsIron Horse Trail account
(remaining)
Regional road stop$2,000Iron Horse Trail account
control
Flex stake vehicle control$7,000Iron Horse Trail account
Re-oriented stop control $1,000General Sign operating
at Young/Ahrens,budget
Chapel/Merner and
Church/Cedar& Francis
Street parking bay
signage
Total$250,000
All work is scheduled for fall 2021. The OMCC fundingmust be used prior to the end of
2021or the funds willbe returned to the province.Given this constrained timeline, staff is
proposingthe creation of a new capital project to allow timely procurement of the scope of
work.
Operating Budget–Some additional maintenance is required of the new crossing
treatments:
The flashing beacons will requireminimalelectricity and electrical repairand are
accounted for in the streetlight operating costs;
Pavement markings are to be durable thermoplastic, requiring replacement every 5-
8 years; and
Signs will need eventual replacement due to graffiti or wear and tear.
Life cycle costsof the eight PXOsfor the expenses listed aboveareestimated at an
annualized rate of $4,000.
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT:
INFORM –This report has been posted to the City’s website with the agenda in advance
of the council/ committee meeting.Notices were mailedto properties adjacent to the
crossings.
CONSULT –Significant engagement occurred during thedevelopment of theIron Horse
Trail Improvement Strategy in 2015, with 884 residents providing feedback. A major theme
during this engagement was the need for safer road crossings: “Based on comments
received through the public consultation process, a primary safety concernand identified
priority is the improvement of trail-road intersections and crossings, specifically in terms of
providing safer crossings with improved accessibility…This issue is the most recurring item
that was brought up through the process by the community.”
OnJanuary16, 2019,an open house was hosted to introduce scheduled improvements,
with 84residents providing feedback.Nearly half of all comments provided were requests
for safer trail crossings.
In 2019, Complete Streets consultations engaged 610 residents on how to design streets
for all modes of transportation. An action item was identified to provide raised crossingsto
increase visibility and demonstrate priority for vulnerable users, especially at mid-block
trail crossings.
In 2018-2019, Cycling and Trails Master Plan consultations engaged over 3,200residents.
Action 1A-4 includes thecreation of aspot improvement program for locations identified by
residents as safety concerns. As seen in AppendixC, trail crossingsalong the Iron Horse
Trail were identified as priorities by residents.
In fall 2020, Vision Zero consultations engaged300 people on how safe they feel on city
streets. The need for more frequent, safe pedestrian crossings was identified by residents
as an important way to make city streetssafer. In addition, residents noted that physical
design measures should accompanyPXOs to ensure drivers are fully aware of their
responsibility to yield to pedestrians.
On May 11, 2021, the Cycling and Trails Advisory Committee commented on the proposed
plans and requested a greater use of flashingbeacons at PXOs to ensure greater driver
compliance in yielding. A unanimous motion was passed: “That the committee supports
the proposedplan to add PXOs and raised crossings tocity-owned streets.”
OnMay27,2021, the Grand River Accessibility Advisory Committee reviewedproposed
plansand offered the following comments:
Really pleased to see the new raised standard that is smooth and flush, which is a
great improvement for people in wheelchairs;
Consistency for all trailsis really important for usersand wants to see the City of
Waterloo and Region of Waterloo provide similar improvements; and
Tactile guidance across the street would be helpful for people with visual
impairments who find it difficult to determine the direct line of travel.
PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES:
DSD-20-203Protected Downtown Cycling Grid
INS-20-015Cycling and Trails Master Plan
DSD-19-235Complete Streets
INS-15-058Iron Horse Trail Improvement Strategy
APPROVEDBY: Justin Readman, General Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A–PXO Warrants
Attachment B -PXOTypes
Attachment C–Spot Improvements
ATTACHMENT A: PXO WARRANTS
UNION STREET
JustificationRequired Actual Conditions Pedestrian Warrant
ValueValueSatisfied?Connectivity?
1. 8-hour Pedestrian > 100 peds200 pedsYES
Volume at proposed
crossover location
2. 8-hour Two-way > 750 veh4475 vehYES
Vehicle Volume
PXO Level 2
3. Distance from > 200 metres75 mNOYES
Type B
Nearest Controlled
Crossing
4. Engineering Volume of vehicles suggests PXO Level 2 Type C but due to high
Judgementspeedof roadway, proximity to signalsand bend in road near
crossing, staff recommendgreater awareness of PXOthrough use
of flashing beacons.
GLASGOW STREET
JustificationRequired Actual Conditions Pedestrian Warrant
ValueValueSatisfied?Connectivity?
1. 8-hour Pedestrian > 100 peds200 pedsYES
Volume at proposed
crossover location
2. 8-hour Two-way > 750 veh3440vehYES
Vehicle Volume
3. Distancefrom > 200 metres70 mNOYES
PXO Level 2
Nearest Controlled
Type B
Crossing
4. Engineering Volume of vehicles suggests PXO Level 2 Type C but due to high
Judgementspeed of roadway and proximity to signal, staff recommend
greater awareness of PXOthrough use of flashing beacons.
Westbound traffic queues from Belmont/Glasgow may extend
through the PXO during the peak hour.
GAGE AVENUE
JustificationRequired Actual Conditions Pedestrian Warrant
ValueValueSatisfied?Connectivity?
1. 8-hour Pedestrian > 100 peds200 pedsYES
Volume at proposed
crossover location
2. 8-hour Two-way > 750 veh1014vehYES
Vehicle Volume
PXO Level 2
Type D
3. Distance from > 200 metres80mNOYES
Nearest Controlled
Crossing
4. Engineering
Judgement
WEST AVENUE
JustificationRequired Actual Conditions Pedestrian Warrant
ValueValueSatisfied?Connectivity?
1. 8-hour Pedestrian > 100 peds200 pedsYES
Volume at proposed
crossover location
2. 8-hour Two-way > 75 veh1928 vehYES
Vehicle Volume
PXO Level 2
Type D
3. Distance from > 200 metres85 mNOYES
Nearest Controlled
Crossing
4. Engineering
Judgement
MILL STREET
JustificationRequired Actual Conditions Pedestrian Warrant
ValueValueSatisfied?Connectivity?
1. 8-hour Pedestrian > 100 peds148 pedsYES
Volume at proposed
crossover location
2. 8-hour Two-way > 750 veh961 vehYES
Vehicle Volume
PXO Level 2
3. Distance from > 200 metres60 mNOYES
Type B
Nearest Controlled
Crossing
4. Engineering Volume of vehicles suggest Type D but due toproximity to
Judgementrailway,highervehiclespeeds and arterialroad designation, staff
recommend flashing beacons
MADISON AVENUE
JustificationRequired Actual Conditions Pedestrian Warrant
ValueValueSatisfied?Connectivity?
1. 8-hour Pedestrian > 100 peds148 pedsYES
Volume at proposed
crossover location
2.8-hour Two-way > 750 veh1955 vehYES
Vehicle Volume
PXO Level 2
Type D
3. Distance from > 200 metres150 mNOYES
Nearest Controlled
Crossing
4. Engineering
Judgement
PALMER AVENUE
JustificationRequired Actual Conditions Pedestrian Warrant
ValueValueSatisfied?Connectivity?
1. 8-hour Pedestrian > 100 peds148 pedsYES
Volume at proposed
crossover location
2.8-hour Two-way > 750 veh5 vehNO
Vehicle Volume
Yield control
3. Distance from > 200 metres70 mNOYES
Nearest Controlled
Crossing
4. Engineering Extremely low vehicle volumes suggest yield control for trail
Judgementusers instead of PXO
KENT AVENUE
JustificationRequired Actual Conditions Pedestrian Warrant
ValueValueSatisfied?Connectivity?
1. 8-hour Pedestrian > 100 peds68 pedsNO
Volume at proposed
crossover location
2. 8-hour Two-way > 750 veh443 vehNO
Vehicle Volume
PXO Level 2
3. Distance from > 200 metres225mYESYES
Type D
Nearest Controlled
Crossing
4. Engineering Consistency with rest of trail corridor justifies PXO. Further,
Judgementfuture development on Courtland Avenue will generate more
pedestrian and vehicle traffic.
Note: Due to COVID-19 restrictions, 8-hour pedestrian counts were not conducted in
person. Rather, the nearest Iron Horse Trail counter was used to justify pedestrian
demand.
ATTACHMENT B: PXO TYPES
Level 2 Pedestrian Crossover Treatments –Type B
(OTM Book 15 –Pedestrian Crossover Treatments)
Kitchener examples include Jubilee Drivein Victoria Parkand King Street at Cameron
Street.
1
Kitchener examples include the Henry Sturm Trail at West Avenue and Patricia Avenue
and the Transit Hub Trail at Park Street.
ATTACHMENT C:SPOT FIXES
Cycling and Trails Master Plan: Connections Report, page 19.