Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHK Agenda - 2021-08-03Heritage Kitchener Agenda Tuesday,August 3, 2021 4:00p.m.-6:00p.m. Office of the City Clerk Electronic Meeting Kitchener City Hall Live Streamed nd 200 King St.W. -2Floor Kitchener ON N2G 4G7 Page 1Chair –S. HossackVice-Chair –J. Haalboom Due to COVID-19 and recommendations by Waterloo Region Public Health to exercise physical distancing, City Hall is closed to the public. Members of the public are invited to participate in this meeting electronically by contacting theCommittee Administrator. While in-person delegation requests are not feasible at this time, members of the public are invited to submit written comments or participate electronically in the meeting by contacting Sarah Goldrupat sarah.goldrup@kitchener.ca.Delegates must register by 2:00 p.m. on August 3, 2021in order to participate electronically. Written comments will be circulated prior to the meeting and will form part of the public record.Members of the public are invited to watch in this meetingelectronically by accessing the meeting live-stream video at www.kitchener.ca/watchnow. Delegations Pursuant to Council’s Procedural By-law, delegations are permitted to address the Committee for a maximumof five (5)minutes. Item 2-Rachel Redshaw, MHBC Planning Discussion Items 1.DSD-2021-145-Heritage Permit Application HPA-2021-V-021(15min) -34-36 Richmond Avenue -Demolition of Detached Garage and Construction of New Detached Garage 2.Draft Phase II HIA-50-56 Weber StreetWest/107 Young Street(30 min) -Proposed 8-storey Residential Development To view the HIA in its entirety, please visit our website: www.kitchener.ca 3.2021 Heritage Planning and Heritage Kitchener Work Plans(60min) 4.StatusUpdates -Heritage Best Practices Update and 2021Priorities(5min) -Heritage Impact Assessment Follow-ups Information Items Heritage Permit Application Tracking Sheet Sarah Goldrup Committee Administrator ** Accessible formats and communication supports are available upon request. If you require assistance to take part in a city meeting or event, please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 ** REPORT TO:Heritage Kitchener DATE OF MEETING:August 3, 2021 SUBMITTED BY:Bustamante,Rosa,Director of Planning,519-741-2200ext. 7319 PREPARED BY:Grohn,Victoria,Heritage Planner,519-741-2200ext. 7041 WARD(S) INVOLVED:Ward9 DATE OF REPORT:July 7, 2021 REPORT NO.:DSD-21-145 SUBJECT:Heritage Permit Application HPA-2021-V-021 34-36 Richmond Avenue Demolition of an existing detached garageand construction of a new detached garage RECOMMENDATION: Thatpursuant to Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Heritage Permit Application HPA-2021-V-021be approved to permit the demolition of an existing detached garage located on the property municipally addressed as 34-36 Richmond Avenue; and That pursuantto Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Heritage Permit Application HPA-2021-V-021be approved to permit the construction of a detached garageon the property municipally addressed as 34-36 Richmond Avenue, in accordance with the plans and supplementary information submitted with the application and subject to the following condition: 1.That the final building permit drawings be reviewed and heritage clearance provided by Heritage Planning staff prior to the issuance of a building permit. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: The purpose of this report is to present the demolition and new construction detailed in HPA-2021-V-021. The key finding of this report isthe demolition will not detract from the character of the Victoria Park Area Heritage Conservation District and that the new construction is generally compliant with the policies contained within the Victoria Park Area Heritage Conservation District Plan. There are no financial implications associated with this report. Community engagement includedconsultation with the Heritage Kitchener committee. This report supports the delivery of core services. *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. 1 - 1 BACKGROUND: The Development Services Department is in receipt of Heritage Permit Application HPA- 2021-V-021which is seeking permission to demolish an existing detached garageand construct a new detached garageon the property municipally addressed as 34-36 Richmond Avenue, located within the Victoria Park Area Heritage Conservation District. REPORT: The subject property is located on the west side of Richmond Avenue between Joseph Street and the Victoria Parksports field in the Victoria Park Area Heritage Conservation District (VPAHCD). The subject property is designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act. Existing accessory structure Location map: 34-36 Richmond Avenue The VPAHCD Study describes the dwelling as a 2-storeyred-brown brick Berlin Vernacular style residence with prominent projecting front porch and later closed-in balcony over.It is further described as being well maintained and innovatively landscaped. The construction date of the dwelling is unknown; however it is likely after 1925 as the dwelling is not shown on the 1925 Fire Insurance Plan.The existing garageis not referenced in the VPAHCD Plan or Study, and the construction date is not known.It islikely constructed 1 - 2 after the construction of the existing dwelling.A portion of the existing garageis visible from Richmond Avenue;however it is situated behind the rear building line. Front elevation: 34-36 Richmond Avenue (image source: GoogleMaps) Proposed Demolition In accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, a heritage permit is required from the Council of a municipality to demolish a building or structure on a designated heritage property. This includes the demolition of an accessory structure, and Heritage Kitchener must be consulted. Front elevation of existing detached garage: 34-36 Richmond Avenue 1 - 3 The VPAHCD Plan contains policies and guidelines for demolition within the district. The policies discourage demolition of original buildings and heritage attributes. While the construction of the existing garage is not known, itappears to be constructed later than the existing dwellingand not considered to be an original structure within the district. The existing detached garageis clad in steel and the applicant advises that the roof is leaking significantly. Proposed Construction The applicant proposes to construct a new detachedgaragewith a similarfootprint and location of the existing detached garage.6.9 11.24 Proposed garage location: 34-36 Richmond Avenue The front elevation of the new garage is proposed to be clad in Maibec horizontal wood siding with Maibec real wood shakes in the front gable. The sides and rear elevation are proposed to be clad in vinyl siding as they are not visible from the public right-of-way. The new garage is proposed to be dark grey in colour with grey or brown garage doors and white or greyvinyl windows and doors. The materials and colours proposed are appropriate for the VPAHCD. Proposed new garage: 34-36 Richmond Avenue 1 - 4 Proposed new garage: 34-36 Richmond Avenue The VPAHCD Plan contains policies for new construction within the district, butdoes not contemplate the construction of new accessory structures, such as garages, as the new construction policies are focused on the Queen Street South corridor. However, the proposed detached garage is in keeping with the building addition policies contained within the VPAHCD Plan, which encourage additions that complement the architecture of dwellings by blending comfortably and inconspicuously with their surroundings. The policies provide guidance on the following: location, design, height, materials, roofs, chimneys, walls, entrances, windows, porches, and colours. The proposed new detached garage complies with the policies for the following reasons: It is located to the rear of the property; It is distinguishable from the dwelling; It is approximately one storey in height; and It featuresMaibec horizontal wood and real wood shakes in a colour that is complimentary to the existing dwelling. Heritage Planning Staff Comments In reviewing the merits of the application, Heritage Planning staff notethe following: The existing detached garage does not contribute to the heritage value of the property; The demolition of the existing detached garage will not detract from the character of the VPAHCD or the integrity of the Richmond Avenue streetscape; The design of the proposed detached garage is compatible with the architecture of the dwelling; The proposed detached garage complies with the policies of the VPAHCD Plan; and The proposed detached garage will not detract from the heritage value or the property or the VPAHCD. In accordance with the Heritage Permit Application form, the approval of any application under the Ontario Heritage Act shall not be a waiver of any of the provisions of any by-law of the City of Kitchener or legislation, including but not limited to, the requirements of the Ontario Building Code and City of Kitchener Zoning By-law. Inthis regard, staff confirm that 1 - 5 a Building Permit is required to demolish the existing detached garage and construct a new detached garage. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital BudgetThe recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating BudgetThe recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM the agenda in advance of the Heritage Kitchenercommittee meeting. CONSULT Heritage Kitchener has been consulted regarding the subject Heritage Permit Application. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: Ontario Heritage Act, 2021 APPROVEDBY:Justin Readman, General Manager, Development Services Department ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A Heritage Permit Application HPA-2021-V-021 1 - 6 HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION & SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS th Planning Division –200 King Street West, 6Floor P.O. Box 1118, Kitchener ON N2G 4G7 519-741-2426; planning@kitchener.ca STAFF USE ONLY Date Received:Accepted By:Application Number: HPA-2021- PART B: HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION FORM 1.NATURE OF APPLICATION ExteriorInteriorSignage DemolitionNew ConstructionAlterationRelocation 2.SUBJECT PROPERTY 36-34 Richmond Ave. Kitchener Municipal Address: Part of Lots 1 & 2 Reg Plan 80 and Part of lot 143 Sub 17 Legal Description (if know): Building/Structure Type:ResidentialCommercialIndustrialInstitutional Heritage Designation:Part IV (Individual)Part V (Heritage Conservation District) Is the property subject to a Heritage Easement or Agreement?YesNo 3.PROPERTY OWNER Name: ECR Managment Inc Address:490 Dutton Drive Unit 3A City/Province/Postal Code:Waterloo, Ontario N2L 6H7 Phone: 519-888-9616 Email: cameron@camkeller.on.ca 4.AGENT (if applicable) Matt Williams Name: Company: Address:5093 Fountain St N City/Province/Postal Code: Breslau, ON N0B1M0 Phone: 226-688-4205 Email: mwilliams@gamasonry.com 2021 City of Kitchener – Heritage Permit Application &Submission RequirementsPage 7 of 9 1 - 7 5.WRITTEN DESCRIPTION Provide a written description of the project including any conservation methods proposed. Provide such detail as materials to be used, measurements, paint colours, decorative details, whether any original building fabric is to be removed or replaced, etc. Use additional pages as required. Please refer to the City of Kitchener Heritage Permit Application Submission Guidelines for further direction. Removal of a steel clad garage structure that has become unsafe for use or repair and replacing it with a new garage wood framed garage structure with a siding exterior 6.REVIEW OF CITY OF KITCHENER HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMISSION GUIDELINES Describe why it is necessary to undertake the proposed work: The garage structure is unsafe for use and the roof is leaking significantly and is unsafe to repair properly. The worn steel cladding and roof does not match the area or provide any historical significance, so the best solution would be to replace the existing structure with something properly built and safe for use. Describe how the proposal is consistent with the Part IV individual designating by-law or the Part V Heritage Conservation District Plan: The existing garage (constructed by a previous owner) outside finishes are worn down and do not match the outbuilding . The new design will offer a simple sided design that will guideline outlined in the Victoria Park heritage District Plan match closer to the desired finish and be an overall improvement to the area. Describe how the proposal is consistent with Parks Canada’sStandards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (www.historicplaces.ca/en/pages/standards-normes.aspx): As the outbuilding does not offer any historical significants and does not match the neighbourhood as is, re-construction would be an improvement to the area 7.PROPOSED WORKS a)Expected start date:Expected completion date: Fall 2021Fall 2021 b)Have you discussed this work with Heritage Planning Staff?YesNo Victoria Grohn -If yes, who did you speak to? c)Have you discussed this work with Building Division Staff?YesNo -If yes, who did you speak to? Dillon LaRose d)Have you applied for a Building Permit for this work?YesNo e)Other related Building or Planning applications:Application number 21-113938 5.ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The undersigned acknowledges that all of the statements contained in documents filed in support of this application shall be deemed part of this application. The undersigned acknowledges that receipt of this application by the City of Kitchener - Planning Division does not guarantee it to be a ‘complete’ application. Theundersigned acknowledges that the Council of the City of Kitchener shall determine whether the information submitted forms a complete application. Further review of the application will be undertaken and the owner or agent may be contacted to provide additional information and/or resolve any discrepancies or issues with the application as submitted. Once the application is deemed to be fully complete, the application will be processed and, if necessary, scheduled for the next available HeritageKitchener committee and Council meeting. Submission ofthis application constitutesconsentforauthorized municipal staff to enter upon the subject property for the purpose of conducting site visits, including taking photographs, which are 2021 City of Kitchener – Heritage Permit Application &Submission RequirementsPage 8 of 9 1 - 8 necessaryfor the evaluation of this application. The undersigned acknowledges that where an agent has been identified, the municipality is authorized but not required to contact this person in lieu of the owner and this person is authorized to act on behalf of theowner for all matters respecting the application. The undersigned agrees that the proposed work shall be done in accordance with this application and understands that the approval of this application under the Ontario Heritage Actshall not be a waiver ofany of the provisions of any by-law of the City of Kitchener or legislation including but not limited to the requirements of the Building Code and the Zoning By-law. The undersigned acknowledges that in the event this application is approved, any departure from the conditions imposed by the Council of the City of Kitchener or from the plans or specifications approved by the Council of the City of Kitchener is prohibited and could result in a fine being imposed or imprisonment as provided for under the Ontario Heritage Act. Matt Williams Signature of Owner/Agent:Date: 2021/05/18 2021/05/18 Signature of Owner/Agent:Date: Cameron Keller 6.AUTHORIZATION If this application is being made by an agent on behalf of the property owner, the following authorization must be completed: I / We, , owner of the land that is subject of this application, ECR Management Inc hereby authorize to act on my / our behalf in this regard. Matt Williams Matt Williams 2021/05/18 Signature of Owner/Agent:Date: 2021/05/18 Cameron Keller Signature of Owner/Agent:Date: The personal information on this form is collected under the legal authority of Section 33(2), Section 42(2), and Section 42(2.2) of the Ontario Heritage Act. The information will be used for the purposes of administering the Heritage Permit Application and ensuring appropriate service of notice of receipt under Section 33(3) and Section 42(3) of the Ontario Heritage Act. If you have any questions about this collection of personal information, please contact the Manager of Corporate Records, Legislated Services Division, City of Kitchener (519-741-2769). STAFF USE ONLY Application Number: Application Received: ApplicationComplete: Notice of Receipt: Notice of Decision: 90-Day Expiry Date: PROCESS: Heritage Planning Staff: Heritage Kitchener: Council: 2021 City of Kitchener – Heritage Permit Application &Submission RequirementsPage 9 of 9 1 - 9 1 - 10 1 - 11 seen from the road.Iron Ore Colour as they will not be Sides and rear siding to be Vinyl, Trim to be be slightly lighterSiding Colour to match Iron Ore, horizontal wood siding and trim, Front elevation siding to be Maibec random widthsrectangular shape with Real Wood Shakes, Shakes to be Maibec 1 - 12 1 - 13 Date:July 20, 2021 To:Members of Heritage Kitchener From:Victoria Grohn, Heritage Planner cc:Andrew Pinnell, Senior Planner Subject:50-56 Weber Street West / 107 Young Street Draft Phase II Heritage Impact Assessment The Planning Division is in receipt of a draft Phase II Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) dated June 29, 2021and prepared by MHBC Planning Ltd. regarding a proposal to redevelop 50-56 Weber Street West and 107 Young Street. The subject lands are located within the Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District(CCNHCD)and designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act. The applicant intends to demolish 50-52 and 56 Weber StreetWest and incorporated 107 Young Street into an 8-storey residential development. City Council approved the demolition of 50-52 and 56 Weber Street West in August 2020. In order to accommodate underground parking on the site, the applicant intends to temporarily relocate 107 Young Street. In reviewing the draft HIA, Heritage Planning staff have noted some areas of the reportwhich require further assessment and discussion; particularly around the temporary relocation of 107 Young Street and the building’s incorporation into the proposed development. Heritage Planning staff will be seeking additional information and clarification in this regard as we move through the Site Plan review process. The HIAis not clear about how the building at 107 Young Street will be addressed in the interim (i.e. through relocation to another spot on site, relocated to the boulevard, relocated to Young Street or temporarily lifted in place) and what the potential impacts of each of these scenarios may be on 107 Young Street and the district. Additionally, Heritage Planning staff will be seeking further clarification with respect to thebuildingdesign, architectural details, and materials of the proposed development and how this proposalis in keeping with the policies and guidelines of the CCNHCD Planfor new construction within the district. Heritage Planning staff has already provided the heritage consultant with detailed comments on the draft HIA and what information is still required to be provided as we continue to work through the Site Plan review process.At this time, Heritage Planning staff is seeking the committee’s input on the draft HIA and these comments will be taken into consideration as staff continues to review the HIA and associated planning application. A motion or recommendation to Council is not required. The applicant and their consultants will attend the August 3, 2021meeting of Heritage Kitchener to present the draft Phase II HIA and answer questions. 2 - 1 Relevant pages from the draft Phase II HIA are attached. The full draft HIA will be made available under separate cover on the City’s website. _____________________________ Victoria Grohn, BES Heritage Planner 2 - 2 - - 2 - 3 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON Project Personnel Dan Currie, MA, MCIP, RPP, Managing Director of Cultural Senior Review CAHP Heritage Rachel Redshaw, MA, HE Dipl.Heritage Planner Author Glossary of Abbreviations Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation CCNHCD District HIA Heritage Impact Assessment HCD Heritage Conservation District MHBC MacNaughton Hermsen Britton Clarkson Planning Limited Ministry of Heritage, Sport, Tourism and Culture MHSTCI Industries OHA Ontario Heritage Act OHTK Ontario Heritage Toolkit Ontario Regulation 9/06 for determining cultural O-REG 9/06 heritage significance PPS 2014 Provincial Policy Statement (2020) TPP Temporary Protection Plan Acknowledgements This report acknowledges that assistance provided by the City of Kitchener Public Library, Grace Schmidt Room of Local History. The report also acknowledges that the City of Kitchener is situated on the land and traditional territory of the Anishinabewaki, Attiwonderonk and Haudenosaunee which is located within the lands protected under the Crown Grant to the Six Nations or the Haldimand Tract (Treaty 4/ Simcoe Patent). June 2021 MHBC | 3 2 - 4 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON Executive Summary An initial Phase I HIA was completed and submitted in June 2018 which proposed to remove all buildings on the subject lands. The proposal was revised to retain 107 Young Street and a second Phase I was submitted March 13, 2020; the removal of the buildings at 50-52 and 56 Weber Street West was approved in August of 2020. The purpose of the Phase II of the HIA is to provide a detailed analysis of the proposed development, and its compliance with the CCNHCD Plan (2007). The proposed development includes 1) the construction of a new 8 storey building; and, 2) the alteration of 107 Young Street to facilitate its integration into the new construction. The following lists impacts identified as it relates to the compliance with the CCNHCD policies and guidelines and impacts of development on existing and adjacent resources: Impacts Minor impact of alteration to 107 Young Street due to the removal of building fabric to facilitate the integration of the new building. This alteration impacts heritage attributes of the CCNHCD as it is to a well maintained, finely detailed building that is largely intact. Potential impact of land disturbances for 107 Young Street due to vibrations emitted from construction equipment once it is returned to its original location and construction continues to occur for the integration of the house into the new development. There is potential for physical damage to existing building during this phase (i.e. dust, debris, materials or equipment accidentally hitting exterior form). Potential impact of land disturbances for 48 Weber Street West and 109 Young Street, which are a contributing, well maintained, largely intact buildings within the CCNHCD. The depth of excavation caused by the two level parking garage raises potential impacts of land disturbances to the foundation of both of these adjacent buildings. Recommendations: 107 Young Street and Adjacent Properties Temporary Protection Plan which will include a Vibration Monitoring Plan for subject lands and adjacent properties; Salvage and inventory of removed built heritage fabric extracted from 107 Young Street to facilitate the physical connection between the new construction and existing building; Monitoring of deconstruction of portion of 107 Young Street as part of the alteration; June 2021 MHBC | 4 2 - 5 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON The rehabilitation of 107 Young Street must be consistent with the Parks Canada Standards and nd Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (2 Edition) as outlined in Section 7.0 of this report and in accordance with Section 12.C.1.20 of the City’s Official Plan; it is recommended that work be completed by professionals who are members of the Canadian Association of Heritage Professionals (CAHP) who are familiar with these standards and guidelines and that MHBC monitor the progression of the rehabilitation; and, Materials extracted from the demolition of 50-56 Weber Street West and alteration to 107 Young Street should be repurposed within the development, if feasible. This includes materials such as: o Masonry; o Wood (i.e. flooring); o Original front door of 56 Weber Street West. CCNHCD: Exterior finishes and materials should be of high quality and consistent with the CCNHCD; their compatibility will be subject to Site Plan Review Committee approval through the Site Plan process; and, Lighting should be used to emphasis 107 Young Street along the streetscape, and signage should not obstruct significant views of 107 Young Street and the greater CCNHCD. June 2021 MHBC | 5 2 - 6 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Background MHBC Planning, Urban Design and Landscape Architecture (“MHBC”) was retained by Facet Design Studio to undertake a Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) for the subject lands, which is comprised of the properties located at 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West as well as 107 Young Street (see Appendix A for location map). The City of Kitchener required the submission of an HIA in accordance to Section 12 C.1.23 (a)(d)(e). For the purpose of the proposal, the Heritage Impact Assessment was divided into two (2) phases. A revised Phase I HIA was submitted March 13, 2020. The Phase I HIA determined the following Cultural Heritage Value or Interest (CHVI) for each property on-site: 50-52 Weber Street, “The Cottage” has representative design value as a representative Ontario Gothic Revival Cottage and contextual value for its location in CCNHCD; 56 Weber Street, “The Motz House” has representative design value as a Queen Anne building, historical associations with John and William J. Motz and Henry J. Shoniker and contextual value in CCNHCD; 107 Young Street, “The Craftsman House” has representative value as Arts and Craft/ Craftsman house, its historical association with architect C. Knetchel and contextual value in CCNHCD. The Phase I HIA submitted in 2020 concluded that the removal of 50-52 Weber Street West was a moderate impact and the removal of 56 Weber Street West was a minor impact. These impacts were based on the heritage attributes associated with the CCNHCD. There was also a potential impact of land disturbances to 48 Weber Street West due to its proximity to the new construction. Mitigation measures that were recommended included: A Commemoration Plan to commemorate the historical associations of 56 Weber Street West; A Demolition Plan which would include identifying salvageable material from 50-56 Weber Street West and archival documentation to be consistent with Section 12.C.1.33 of the Official Plan. The Demolition is further explained in Section 1o.0 of the HIA Phase I (see Appendix ‘J’). June 2021 MHBC | 6 2 - 7 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON The HIA Phase I was approved as well as the heritage permits for thedemolition of 50-56 Weber Street West in August 2020. 1.2 Purpose The purpose of the Phase II of the HIA is to provide a detailed analysis of the proposed development, and its compliance with the CCNHCD Plan (2007). The proposed development includes: 1) the construction of a new 8 storey building; and, 2) the alteration of 107 Young Street to facilitate its integration into the new construction. Section 12 of the Kitchener Official Plan (2014) provides the following objectives regarding the conservation of cultural heritage resources: 12.1.1. To conserve the city’s cultural heritage resources through their identification, protection, use and/or management in such a way that their heritage values, attributes and integrity are retained. 12.1.2. To ensure that all development or redevelopment and site alteration is sensitive to and respects cultural heritage resources and that cultural heritage resources are conserved. If any impacts is identified, mitigative and/ or conservation measures identified in this report and approved by the City will be incorporated into the redevelopment plans and conditions of approval for planning application as per Section 12.C.1.2.7 of the Official Plan. June 2021 MHBC | 7 2 - 8 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON 3.0 Description of Site and Surrounding Area 3.1 Description of Subject Lands The subject lands are comprised of the properties located at 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West and 107 Young Street and are approximately 0.179 hectares (0.442 acres) in size (See Appendix A for maps of the subject lands). The subject lands include three (3) existing buildings at 50-52 and 56 Weber Street West and 107 Young Street. There is limited landscaping on the subject lands with the exception of low lying foundation plants and row of mature trees along the southern periphery of 107 Young Street. Access to 50-56 Weber Street West can be accessed via Weber Street West and Young Street. Figure 1- Map of subject lands identified by red lines (MHBC, 2019). A photograph and description of each building on the subject lands as per the Architectural Summary of the CCNHCD Plan (2007) is located on the following page. June 2021 MHBC | 10 2 - 9 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON June 2021 MHBC | 11 2 - 10 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON The subject lands are Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation Districtand Civic Centre Secondary Plan, Map 9; the draft Civic Centre Secondary Plan (Map 17) has been released but not approved. A detailed of policies related to the proposed development and Zoning By-law 85-1, REINS (2017), City of Kitchener PARTS Central Plan is included in Section 2.0 of the HIA Phase I (see Appendix ‘J’). 3.2 Description and Heritage Status of Adjacent Properties The City of Kitchener Official Plan defines adjacent as, “Lands, buildings and/or structures that are contiguous or that are directly opposite to other lands, buildings and/or structures, separated only by a laneway, municipal road or other right-of-way.” The following table details the description and heritage status of designated buildings adjacent to the subject lands: June 2021 MHBC | 12 2 - 11 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON 3.3 Weber Street West and Young Street Streetscape The CCNHCD Plan (2007) acknowledges that Weber Street West is a prominent streetscape in the historical development of the City (Sub-section 3.3.5.2). The description of this streetscape notes the larger size and scale of buildings along the streetscape including: churches small scale apartments (3-4 storeys) and a number of larger residences (3.9). The figures demonstrate the adjacent scale and mass of buildings located in the immediate context of the proposed development along Weber Street West. The surrounding buildings are primarily constructed of brick, but other materials such as stucco/ plaster (48 Weber Street West and 44 Weber Street West). Figures 2 & 3-(Above) Photograph of Weber Street WestStreetscape looking westwards along the street; (Below) Photograph of Weber Street West Streetscape looking eastward along the street (Source: MHBC, 2019). June 2021 MHBC | 13 2 - 12 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON The Young Street streetscape is characterized by a mature treed boulevard, predominately two storey dwellings with front porches and hipped roof line either side of the street with relatively large front yard setbacks and low-lying foundation plantings in the immediate area of the subject lands. The construction material is primarily brick, however, there is the integration of stone in various elements of surrounding buildings. Figures 4 & 5- (Above)Photograph ofYoung Street streetscape looking north-east to the interior of the District; (Below) Photograph of Young Street streetscape looking southwards towards intersection at Young and Weber Streets (Source: MHBC, 2019) June 2021 MHBC | 14 2 - 13 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON 4.0 Description of Cultural Heritage Resources The section reviews the cultural heritage value or interest of the retained property located at 107 Young Street and that of the Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District. 4.1 107 Young Street, “The Craftsman House” The building located at 107 Young Street is identified as ‘Group C’ in the CCNHCD Plan. According to the Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District Plan, the building located on the property is a brick building constructed in the vernacular style of architecture c. 1910, however, it would be more accurate to describe the building as being constructed in the ‘Craftsman’ or ‘Arts and Crafts’ architectural style. 4.1.1 Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest The property located at 107 Young Street has design/physical value as the building is representative of the Arts and Crafts style of architecture c. 1912. The building includes features indicative of the Arts and Crafts style including an overhanging roof with verandah supported by brick and wood columns, bay windows, and dormers above the roofline. The building is directly associated with Charles Knechtel (son of Jonas Knechtel), an architect who has constructed other notable buildings in Berlin (Kitchener) in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, such as the former Victoria Park Pavilion. The building is also indirectly associated with John and William J. Motz who granted lands to Louiza Zinger (maiden name Motz) in 1912 who commissioned the construction of the house. While John and William J. Motz never resided on the subject lands, Helen Motz (wife of John Motz) was demonstrated to reside at 107 Young street with her daughter and son-in-law in the year 1921. The property supports the character of the area and is physically and historically linked to its surroundings inclusive of the CCNHCD. Heritage Attributes Overall 1 storey massing of brick construction with original square-shaped plan; June 2021 MHBC | 15 2 - 14 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON Hipped roof with gables at the north, south and west elevations; Large red brick chimney at the south elevation; All original window and door openings and windows with leaded-glass visible from the street; Front (west) elevation verandah with roof overhang supported by half brick and wood pillars ; and, Frontage, setbacks and orientation along Weber Street West. 4.1.2 Building Condition of 107 Young Street, “The Craftsman House” A structural assessment was completed by Tacoma Engineers Inc. on July 3, 2018. This assessment made the following conclusions (see Appendix ‘F’): Location Notes Basement mostly finished. Mechanical room in good condition. Interior and Basement exterior load bearing walls are rubble stone construction and in goodcondition with the exception of some areas affected by efflorescence and surface deterioration. No significant damage observed in the interior of the building. Most Interior considerable damage was related to cracked plaster ceilings in the finished attic areas. None of the cracks were cause of structural concern and could be repaired by an experienced plaster trades person with experience with historic materials. ExteriorOriginal exterior form intact aside from alterations to rear porch. Masonry walls on western elevation determined to be in poor condition with signs of brick damage and distress. Poor details around bay window do not adequately allow for rain to be directed away from the façade. At the time of the inspection, the damage to the brick did not pose a structural concern, although the brick was recommended to be repaired and drainage details improved within 1-2 year timeline. It is important to note that since the assessment was completed, the masonry along the western elevation which was determined to be in poor condition was repaired. The following page provides photographs of the existing building on-site. June 2021 MHBC | 16 2 - 15 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON June 2021 MHBC | 17 2 - 16 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON The building has retained the majority of its original heritage attributes; this has been determined after a comparative study between the original blueprints of the house and the current conditions during site visits. The main alteration to the building was to the rear porch which has been reconstructed. 4.2 Description and Key Heritage Attributes of the Surrounding Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District Key heritage attributes of the CCNHCD are outlined in 2.6 (Section 2.4) of the CCNHCD Plan (2007). These attributes are the defining factors of the heritage district. Key attributes are described in the physical geography and configuration of similar original buildings and their direct relationship to surrounded businesses and factories and original land development pattern of the City. It also describes the progression of architecture and building technology exhibited by houses and other buildings, in particular the unique form of Queen Anne Style specific to the City of Kitchener dubbed “Berlin Vernacular”. ‘Fine’ examples of these are categorized by Group ‘A’ or ‘B’; three quarters of the properties (147 properties) are categorized as Group ‘C’ which exhibit the standard construction and are in a condition of repair and potential restoration. The following is a list of the key attributes of the CCNHCD as defined by the District Plan (2007) on 2.7 Its association with important business and community leaders during a key era of development in Kitchener; A wealth of well maintained, finely detailed buildings from the late 1800s and early 1900s that are largely intact; A number of unique buildings, including churches and commercial buildings, which provide distinctive landmarks within and at the edges of the District; A significant range of recognizable architectural styles and features including attic gable roofs, decorative trim, brick construction, porches and other details, associated with the era in which they were developed; The presence of an attractive and consistent streetscape linked by mature trees, grassed boulevards and laneways; Hibner Park, Kitchener’s second oldest city park, as a green jewel in the centre of the District. These attributes are important to the District and the City as a whole and deserve appropriate preservation and management. June 2021 MHBC | 18 2 - 17 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON 5.0 Description of Proposed Development The proposed development includes the demolition of 50-52 and 56 Weber Street and retention and integration of 107 Young Street into the new development (see Figure 6 & 7). The development consists of an 8 storey apartment building with 31 units and 32 bedrooms and GFA of 7106m². A two level underground parking garage is proposed (see Appendix ‘B’ and ‘C’). To facilitate the construction of the underground parking, the building at 107 Young Street will be temporarily lifted and relocated to the Young Street right-of-way or within the site to facilitate the excavation of the underground parking lot. Reports from Tacoma Engineers and Laurie McCulloch Building Moving confirm that the building is a good candidate for temporarily lifting/ relocation (see Appendix F & G). Figure 6- Excerpt of site plan of proposed development; the existing 107 Young Street is represented in the north- west corner (Facet Design Studio, 2021). June 2021 MHBC | 19 2 - 18 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON The new buildingincludes arange of materials including:stucco finish (light and medium beige), stone masonry veneer, wood finish cladding, architectural concrete block masonry veneer (natural), steel diamond-shaped roofing (blue silver) and steel diamond-shaped tiles (blue silver) and sealed double glazing unit. Figure 7- Coloured rendering of proposed development at intersection of Weber Street West and Young Street (Source: Facet Design Studio, 2021). The new construction will be integrated physically into the existing heritage building by removing a minimal portion of the south-east corner to allow for access and connectivity between buildings. The removal will take place to the rear of the building which includes the removal of the rear porch which is identified in the HIA Phase I as being a later reconstruction. The development will alter the roofline in this portion of the building as well as two door and two window openings. June 2021 MHBC | 20 2 - 19 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON Figure 8- West elevation of proposed development showing the integration of the new construction with the existing building located at 107 Young Street (Source: Facet Design Studio, 2021). June 2021 MHBC | 21 2 - 20 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON 6.0 Impacts of Proposed Development 6.1 Classifications of Impacts The impacts of a proposed development or change to a cultural heritage resource may occur over a short or long-term duration, and may occur during a pre-construction phase, construction phase or post- construction phase. Impacts to a cultural heritage resource may also be site specific or widespread, and may have low, moderate or high levels of physical impact. According to the Ontario Heritage Tool Kit, the following constitutes negative impacts which may result from a proposed development: Destruction: of any, or part of any significant heritage attributes or features; Alteration: that is not sympathetic, or is incompatible, with the historic fabric and appearance: Shadows: created that alter the appearance of a heritage attribute or change the viability of a natural feature or plantings, such as a garden; Isolation: of a heritage attribute from its surrounding environment, context or a significant relationship; Direct or Indirect Obstruction: of significant views or vistas within, from, or of built and natural features; A change in land use: such as rezoning a battlefield from open space to residential use, allowing new development or site alteration to fill in the formerly open spaces; Land disturbances: such as a change in grade that alters soils, and drainage patterns that adversely affect a cultural heritage resource. Furthermore, this report utilizes guides published by the International Council on Monuments and Site (ICOMOS), Council of UNESCO, from the World Heritage Convention of January of 2011. The grading of impact is based on “Guide to Assessing Magnitude of Impact” as a framework for this report: Built Heritage and Historic Landscapes Impact Grading Description Major Change to key historic building elements that contribute to the cultural heritage value or interest (CHVI) such that the resource is totally altered. Comprehensive changes to the setting. Moderate Change to many key historic building elements, such that the resource is significantly modified. Changes to the setting of an historic building, such that it is significantly modified. MinorChange to key historic building elements, such that the asset is slightly different. Change to setting of an historic building, such that is it noticeably changed. June 2021 MHBC | 22 2 - 21 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON Negligible/ Slight changes to historic building elements or setting that hardly affect Potentialit. No changeNo change to fabric or setting. 6.2 Impact of Proposed Development on Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District Plan (2007) Section 3.3.4 of the CCNHCD Plan states that the goal of the HCD is to preserve and protect the heritage resources within its boundaries, however, the Plan states that there are situations where demolition and redevelopment may occur where it is in keeping with appropriate City policies. The following section will review the compliance of the proposed development in the framework of the policies and guidelines within the CCNHCD. Figure 9- Map of the Civic Centre Neighbourhood Boundary. Shaded areas indicate properties within the ‘Weber Street Area’ which pertains to specific policies of the HCD Plan. Approximate location of subject lands noted in red. *Note that the subject lands are entirely within the Weber Street Area. (Source: CCNHCD Plan, 2007). June 2021 MHBC | 23 2 - 22 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON Weber Street Area Special Policies and Guidelines Section 3.3.5.2 of the CCNHCD Plan (2007) states that Weber Street contains a number of the oldest buildings in the Civic Centre Neighbourhood and that the scale of heritage buildings is generally larger than those at the interior of the district (being 3-4 storeys) and there have been a number of larger residences converted to multiple residential units or office/ commercial units. The following excerpt from the CCNHCD Plan (2007) describes the Weber Street Area Weber Street contains nearly half of the oldest buildings in the Civic Centre Neighbourhood, making it one of the most important streets in the District from an architectural and historic perspective. The size and scale of heritage buildings on Weber Street is generally larger than the rest of the District, and includes two churches, small scale apartments (3 – 4 storeys) and a number of other larger residences that have been converted to multiple residential units or office/commercial uses. The Municipal Plan designates most of the street as High Density Commercial Residential, with the designation extending slightly in some areas. The following policies are to apply to the whole of Weber Street within the District as well as to those sections of the High Density Commercial Residential designation that extend into the District on College and Young Streets. The Weber Street Area policies are: a) The protection and retention of existing heritage buildings and their architectural features is strongly encouraged; The proposed development will retain the existing building at 107 Young Street and its associated architectural features. The building at 50-52 and 56 Weber Street West have already been approved for removal. b) Maintain residential streetscape character through the use of appropriate built form, materials, roof pitches, architectural design and details particularly at the interface between Weber Street and the interior of the neighbourhood, The proposed development will be larger in built form and height than the buildings within the interior of the neighbourhood. However, the building includes a 2 storey podium which helps it relate to the two storey buildings along Young Street. The materials used are more similar to that along the Weber Street interface (i.e. stucco is June 2021 MHBC | 24 2 - 23 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON used in 48 Weber Street West). The architectural design is contemporary, including its roof pitch, which is to be a contemporary interpretation of an inverted gable roof. The north side of Weber Street West is characterised by a range of uses including residential, institutional, and mixed-use. It includes two large places of worship and their associated surface parking lots and purpose-built multiple residential buildings. The remaining single detached dwellings have all been converted to multiple residential dwellings or non-residential uses. As a result, the character and built form of the Weber Street area is different than the rest of the District. The use of the proposed building as a multiple residential building is consistent with the other uses on the street. The two storey podium, the location of parking at the rear, and some of the building materials are consistent with the existing character, albeit the new building is taller than the others in the Weber Street area. d) Where redevelopment is proposed on vacant or underutilized sites, new development shall be sensitive to and compatible with adjacent heritage resources on the street with respect to height, massing, built form and materials. The proposed development is larger in height and massing than the adjacent heritage resources, however, it incorporates 107 Young Street into the overall design and uses design elements from the adjacent 48 Weber Street (i.e. stucco, width of building mass along Weber Street interface). The Heritage Conservation District Plan considers that tall buildings may be developed within the Weber Street Area consistent with the Secondary Plan policies and Zoning Bylaw that identify this area for high density mixed use. Taller, higher density buildings can be “compatible” with lower density developments. Compatible is not intended to mean “same as”, but whether or not a taller building can co-exist with lower density developments without adverse impacts. e) Any buildings proposed over 5 storeys in height may be required to undertake shadow studies where they abut existing residential uses, to demonstrate that June 2021 MHBC | 25 2 - 24 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON they will not unreasonably impact on access to sunlight in rear yard amenity areas. The proposed development is over 5 storeys and a shadow study was completed to demonstrate that the shadows caused by the new building will not unreasonably impact access to sunlight in rear yard amenity spaces of adjacent properties (see Appendix D). Residential properties are abutting Roy Street which are not impacted by shadows and do not jeopardize the continued use of those properties for residential uses. Adjacent property at 109 Young Street is used as commercial property with no rear yard amenity. f) Design guidelines provided in Section 6.9.2 \[Note: this is a typo and should read 6.9.4\] Section of this Plan will be used to review and evaluate proposals for major alterations, additions or new buildings to ensure that new development is compatible with the adjacent context. See the following sub-section regarding the evaluation of the proposed development under the site specific guidelines in Sub-section 6.9.4 of the CCNHCD Plan. Site/ Area Specific Design Guidelines for Weber Street The CCNHCD Plan (2007) outlines site specific guidelines in Sub-section 6.9.4 of the Plan. They are as follows: Any infill development on Weber Street should maintain a strong relationship to the street at the lower levels (2 to 4 storeys) with respect to built form and use. The proposed development will have a two storey podium to reflect the general height of buildings within the interior of the District and to maintain a strong relation to the street and pedestrians. June 2021 MHBC | 26 2 - 25 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON Figures 10 & 11- (above) South elevation of proposed development; (below) West elevation of proposed development; red box indicates projecting first two storeys (Source: Facet Design Studios, 2021). Setbacks of new development should be consistent with adjacent buildings. Where significantly different setbacks exist on either side, the new building should be aligned with the building that is most similar to the predominant setback on the street. The proposed building is setback approximately two metres for both the front yard setback, and exterior side yard setback along Young Street. Road widening by the Region will result in a front yard setback that is 3.0 metres due to widening. The proposed new building will be approximately 1.0 in front of 107 Young Street. June 2021 MHBC | 27 2 - 26 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON Building facades at the street level should incorporate architectural detail, similar materials and colours, and consistency with the vertical and horizontal proportions or rhythm of adjacent / nearby buildings on the street to establish a cohesive streetscape. The buildings on Weber Street West includes a range of materials, colours, and architectural styles indicative of their period of construction. Therefore, there is no consistent or dominant design standard. The proposed development incorporates a contemporary interpretation of vertical and horizontal proportions of nearby buildings. The colours are neutral including beige/ cream which is commonly used throughout buildings in the District. Figure 12-Coloured rendering showing view of proposed development looking westward comparing it to the existing building at 48 Weber Street West (Source: Facet Design Studios, 2021) New development shall have entrances oriented to the street. The new development has a primary entrance off of Weber Street West which is oriented towards that streetscape. June 2021 MHBC | 28 2 - 27 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON Size, placement and proportion of window and door openings for new buildings or additions should be generally consistent with those on other buildings along the street. The buildings on Weber Street West have a variety of size, placement and proportion of window and door openings. Any new buildings taller than 3 to 4 storeys should incorporate some form of height transition or stepbacks to minimize the perception of height and shadow impacts to pedestrians on the street and provide more visual continuity. Stepbacks should be a minimum of 2 metres to provide for useable outdoor terraces for the upper levels. The proposed development is taller than 4 storeys and incorporates a two storey podium with ththth stepback then four storeys with a stepback at the 7and 8 storey. The 8 storey is largely screened from view at the pedestrian level and only visible from a longer distance. Any buildings taller than 5 storeys abutting a residential property to the rear should be constructed within a 45 degree angular plane where feasible, starting from the rear property line, to minimize visual impacts on adjacent property owners. The rear of the subject lands abut properties that are designated Office Residential Conversion. The subject lands do not abut the Low Rise Residential designated areas that make up the interior of the Heritage District. Section 5.2.3 of the HCD Study as well as the policies of the Secondary Plan identify that the Office Residential Conversion lands are intended to provide a buffer and transition between the higher density uses on Weber Street and the low rise residential areas in the Heritage District. The intent of the angular plane guideline is to ensure that tall buildings don’t negatively impact the character of low rise residential properties and jeopardize their continued residential use. The proposed development meets the 45 degree angular plane guideline when measured from the edge of the Low Rise Residential properties on Roy Street (See Appendix B). CCN HCD Study 5.2.3 Land Use Designations and Zoning The Office-Residential Conversion designation is intended to preserve existing structures and to serve as a transition area between the higher intensity uses along Weber and Queen Street and the Low Rise Residential – Preservation designation. June 2021 MHBC | 29 2 - 28 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON To minimize impacts on properties to the rear of or flanking Weber Street, a rear yard setback of 15 metres should be maintained for new buildings as well as additions where feasible. The rear yard setback is 7.5 metres and does not meet this guideline. Locate loading, garbage and other service elements (HVAC, meters, etc.) away from the front façade so they do not have a negative visual impact on the street or new building / addition. Loading, garbage and other service elements located away from the front façadeto the rear of the building between the new building and 107 Young Street to avoid a negative visual impact on the street or new building. 6.3 Impact of Proposed Development on 107 Young Street and Adjacent Properties 6.3.1 107 Young Street The following chart evaluates the impact the proposed development will have on the existing cultural heritage resource on the subject lands. Table 1.0 Adverse Impacts to 107 Young Street Level of Impact Impact Analysis ((Potential, No, Minor, Moderate or Major) Destruction or alteration In order to facilitate the excavation for the Minor. underground parking garage, the existing of heritage attributes house located at 107 Young Street will be temporarily lifted to the Young Street right of way which will remove its original foundation. The development will retain the building at 107 Young Street, however, the new construction requires the removal of a portion of the south east corner of the exterior wall and roofline, which are considered heritage attributes, to facilitate the integration of the building into the new development. This alteration requires the June 2021 MHBC | 30 2 - 29 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON removal of some building fabric including a portion of the roofline and masonry walls and rear porch. See sub-section 6.2.1.1. The property will not have shadows that Shadows No. adversely affect its associated heritage attributes as a result of the development. See Appendix ‘D’ for Shadow Study. The proposed development will not isolate Isolation No. the building from its neighbouring heritage properties or from the overall CCNHCD. Direct or Indirect The new construction is set in front of the No. setback of 107 Young Street which may Obstruction of Views indirectly obstruct views along the east side of Young Street, however, historically this view has been blocked by the former building at 56 Weber Street. See sub-section 6.2.1.3. A Change in Land Use NoThe building will continue to be used for residential purposes. During construction, the building will be Land Disturbance Potential. temporarily lifted and relocated to the boulevard. A Conservation Plan will require protection measures for this task. June 2021 MHBC | 31 2 - 30 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON The proposed development will temporarily relocate the existing house at 107 Young Street during the construction period to allow for excavation for the two level parking garage for the new construction. This will result in the removal of the original foundation of the house. The original house will be returned to its original location on the lot and therefore, the original setback and original orientation to Young Street will be maintained. Figure 13- Aerial view of subject lands; red arrow indicating temporary relocation to Young Street right of way (Source: VuMap, 2021). June 2021 MHBC | 32 2 - 31 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON The development requires the removal of a portion of the south east corner of the house, including roofline, to facilitate the integration of the building into the new development. The removal includes the rear porch, which was reconstructed, and approximately 2.8 metres on the south elevation and approximately 5 metres on the east elevation with a total of 14m². This alteration requires the removal of some building fabric including a portion of the roofline and masonry walls (see Appendix ‘A’ for larger version). Figures 14 & 15- (above) Excerpt of Site Plan of identifying location of building fabric proposed to be removed from 107 Young Street to facilitate the integration into the new construction; red box indicating building fabric proposed to be removed (below) Main floor plan indicating area proposed to be removed (Source: Facet Design Studio, 2021). June 2021 MHBC | 33 2 - 32 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON Figures 16, 17 & 18- (above left) East elevation of 107 Young Street; red box indicating approximate area to be removed; (above right) South elevation indicating approximate area to be removed; (below) Photograph of existing rear porch and south and east elevations to be removed (Source: Facet Design Studio, 2021). June 2021 MHBC | 34 2 - 33 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON The table on the following page identifies the twoidentified significant views of the existing buildings on the subject lands. 2 1 Table 2.0 Significant Views View No. 1- Static view from west side of Young Street looking eastward View No. 2- Kinetic view via Young Street entering and existing CCNHCD June 2021 MHBC | 35 2 - 34 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON View No.1 –Static view from west side of Young Street looking eastward The house located at 107 Young Street will be returned to its original location, retaining its original setbacks and orientation. The proposed development will not significantly alter this view, although there will be changes within the background due to the new construction. Figure 19- Static view of 107 Young Street looking eastwards (Source: MHBC, 2018). June 2021 MHBC | 36 2 - 35 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON View No.2 –Kinetic view along Young Street entering and exiting the CCNHCD The proposed development will remove the existing trees that have historically blocked the view of 107 Young Street moving northwards along Young Street which will improve its visibility (see Figures 21-22). The proposed development has a similar setback to 107 Young Street and formerly 56 Weber Street West to maintain a sense of continuity between the old and new. The view moving southwards along Young Street towards Weber Street will not change with the exception that the new building will be visible in the background (see Figures 20 & 21). Figures 20 & 21- (above) View of Young Street streetscape looking northwards (Source: Google Earth Pro, 2021).; (below) Rendering of proposed development at the intersection of Young and Weber Street West (Source: Facet Design Studio, 2021). June 2021 MHBC | 37 2 - 36 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON Figures 22 & 23- (above) View of existing Young Street streetscape looking southwards (Source: Google Earth Pro, 2021); (below) Coloured rendering view of Young Street streetscape looking southwards (Source: Facet Design Studio, 2021). June 2021 MHBC | 38 2 - 37 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON 6.3.2 48 Weber Street and 109 Young Street Table 3.0 on the following page evaluates the impact the proposed development will have on the existing cultural heritage resource adjacent to the subject lands. A minor impact of land disturbances is identified for both adjacent properties at 48 Weber Street West and 109 Young Street as they are within close proximity of excavation and construction for the proposed development. The property at 109 Young Street is approximately 3.7metres and 48 Weber Street is approximately 3.9 metres from the underground parking garage (see Figure 24). Figure 24- Excerpt of basement/ parking level floor plan in comparison to neighbouring heritage properties; measurements are in red (Source: Facet Design Studio, 2021 & MHBC, 2021). June 2021 MHBC | 39 2 - 38 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON Table 3.0 Adverse Impacts to Adjacent Properties Impact 48 Weber Street West 109 Young Street Destructionor No.The proposed development will not No. The proposed development will not alteration of result in alterations or destruction to result in alterations or destruction to heritage identified heritage attributes. identified heritage attributes. attributes Shadows No.Shadows will not negatively impact No.Shadows will not negatively impact or or detract from existing heritage detract from existing heritage attributes of attributes of the building.the building. Isolation No.The proposed development will No. The proposed development will not not isolate the building from its isolate the building from its neighbouring heritage properties or from the overall neighbouring heritage properties or from the overall CCNHCD. CCNHCD. Direct or Indirect No. The proposed development will not No. The proposed development will not Obstruction of obstruct any significant views of the obstruct any significant views of the Views building which consist of kinetic views building which consist of kinetic views along Weber Street West and from the along Young Street and from the west side south side of Weber Street West of Young Street looking north towards the looking north towards the front façade. front façade. A Change in Land No. The land use will be the same. No. The land use will be the same. Use Land Disturbance Potential. The new construction will be Potential. The new construction will be approximately 4 metres between the approximately 4 metres between the existing building and the new existing building and the new construction. There is potential that the construction. There is potential that the vibrations emitted from construction vibrations emitted from construction could impact the foundation of the could impact the foundation of the existing building particularly due to the existing building particularly due to the depth of excavation for the two level depth of excavation for the two level parking garage. parking garage. June 2021 MHBC | 40 2 - 39 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON 6.4 Summary of Impacts The following is a summary of adverse impacts identified in this Section. Please note, that the heritage attributes of the CCNHCD described in Sub-section 4.2 were included as part of the overall analysis. Minor impact of alteration to 107 Young Street due to the removal of building fabric to facilitate the integration of the new building. This alteration impacts heritage attributes of the CCNHCD as it is to a well maintained, finely detailed building that is largely intact. Potential impact of land disturbances for 107 Young Street due to vibrations emitted from construction equipment once it is returned to its original location and construction continues to occur for the integration of the house into the new development. There is potential for physical damage to existing building during this phase (i.e. dust, debris, materials or equipment accidentally hitting exterior form). Potential impact of land disturbances for 48 Weber Street West and 109 Young Street, which are a contributing, well maintained, largely intact buildings within the CCNHCD. The depth of excavation caused by the two level parking garage raises potential impacts of land disturbances to the foundation of both of these adjacent buildings. In conclusion, the proposed development is consistent the majority of the policies and guidelines for the CCNHCD resulting in its general compliancy with the CCNHCD Plan (2007), in particular Section 3.3.1 of the Plan regarding development patterns and land use as the site is considered underutilized. The new building is located at the perimeter of the District where higher density is anticipated and along Weber Street West which varies in mass, scale and architecture. The new building, albeit taller than adjacent buildings within the CCNHCD, does comply with the 45 degree angular plane to ensure adequate transition between higher density developments along Weber Street West and low rise residential areas at the interior of the District. June 2021 MHBC | 41 2 - 40 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON 7.0 Consideration of Alternatives 7.1 Alternative Development Approaches The following have been identified as a range of development alternatives that may be considered as part of the heritage planning process. These options have been assessed in terms of impacts to cultural heritage resources as well as balancing other planning policies within the planning framework. These options could be selected individually or combined. The following are alternative development options to minimize impacts to 107 Young Street on the subject lands, adjacent properties and overall CCNHCD. 7.1.1 Reduce size of underground levels This option results in the reduction of the underground parking/ storage levels as it relates to its proximity to 107 Young Street, 109 Young Street and 48 Weber Street which can result in land disturbances for all of these properties. In order to lessen, or avoid these impacts, mitigation measures can be implemented (i.e. Vibration Monitoring Plan). 7.1.2 Alternative building design avoiding physical integration of 107 Young Street An alternate design that avoids the physical integration of 107 Young Street house with the new building was considered. While this option would result in less impact to the house at 107 Young Street, it would require a separation distance between the two buildings to ensure compliance with the Building Code. The result would be a loss of floor space and density in the new building or additional height to maintain the same density. Given that the impact of connecting the new building to the rear corner of 107 Young Street is relatively minor, this alternative is not recommended. 7.1.3 Alternative design of new building The proposed development is designed as a unique and signature building. The building has a contemporary design that represents the variety of architecture and built form that is present along the Weber Street interface. An alternative design with a greater use of the types of architectural elements and materials that are present on the buildings within the centre of the heritage district would be an option. This alternative could ease the transition from the Weber Street West streetscape to the low rise residential portion of the district, however, this may result in a building form or design of the new building that is less compatible with the form and character of the Weber Street portion of the HCD. June 2021 MHBC | 42 2 - 41 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON 8.0 Mitigation Measures The following lists impacts identified as it relates to the compliance with the CCNHCD policies and guidelines and impacts of development on existing and adjacent resources: Impacts Minor impact of alteration to 107 Young Street due to the removal of building fabric to facilitate the integration of the new building. This alteration impacts heritage attributes of the CCNHCD as it is to a well maintained, finely detailed building that is largely intact. Potential impact of land disturbances for 107 Young Street due to vibrations emitted from construction equipment once it is returned to its original location and construction continues to occur for the integration of the house into the new development. There is potential for physical damage to existing building during this phase (i.e. dust, debris, materials or equipment accidentally hitting exterior form). Potential/ Negligible impact of land disturbances for 48 Weber Street West and 109 Young Street, which are a contributing, well maintained, largely intact buildings within the CCNHCD. The depth of excavation caused by the two level parking garage raises potential impacts of land disturbances to the foundation of both of these adjacent buildings. Mitigation Recommendations: Temporary Protection Plan which will include a Vibration Monitoring Plan for subject lands and adjacent properties; Salvage and inventory of removed built heritage fabric extracted from 107 Young Street to facilitate the physical connection between the new construction and existing building; Monitoring of deconstruction of portion of 107 Young Street as part of the alteration; The rehabilitation of 107 Young Street must be consistent with the Parks Canada Standards and nd Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (2 Edition) as outlined in Section 7.0 of this report and in accordance with Section 12.C.1.20 of the City’s Official Plan; it is recommended that work be completed by professionals who are members of the Canadian Association of Heritage Professionals (CAHP) who are familiar with these standards and guidelines and that MHBC monitor the progression of the rehabilitation; and, June 2021 MHBC | 43 2 - 42 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON Materials extracted from the demolition of 50-56 Weber Street West and alteration to 107 Young Street should be repurposed within the development, if feasible. This includes materials such as: o Masonry; o Wood (i.e. flooring); o Original front door of 56 Weber Street West. CCNHCD: Exterior finishes and materials should be of high quality and consistent with the CCNHCD; their compatibility will be subject to Site Plan Review Committee approval through the Site Plan process; and, Lighting should be used to emphasis 107 Young Street along the streetscape, and signage should not obstruct significant views of 107 Young Street and the greater CCNHCD. June 2021 MHBC | 44 2 - 43 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON 9.0 Conservation Recommendations The following sub-section briefly reviews the applicable conservation principles as it relates to the conservation of 107 Young Street within the construction process as well as a Conservation Plan. 9.1 Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada nd (2Edition) This Section of the report refers to the Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (referred to in this report as the ‘Standards and Guidelines’) (Parks Canada, 2010). This document has been accepted as best planning practice for heritage conservation and its contents and use are supported by the City of Kitchener Official Plan as follows: 12.C.1.21 The City will make decisions with respect to cultural heritage resources with the policies of the Provincial Policy Statement, which require the conservation of significant heritage resources. In addition, such decisions will be consistent with the Parks Canada Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada. 9.1.1 Review and Application of the Standards for Rehabilitation The Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (2011) provide standards for rehabilitation; this includes the 12 General Standards: 1. Conserve the Heritage value of an historic place. Do not remove, replace or substantially alter its intact or repairable character-defining elements. Do not move a part of an historic place if its current location is a character-defining element. It is not proposed that any character-defining element will be removed. The front porch will temporarily be removed for the duration of the relocation, however, it is planned that this element will be reconstructed in its original location once it returns to its original location. A portion of the roofline will be removed 2. Conserve changes to a historic place that, over time, have become character-defining elements in their own right. Although, the rear porch is a later addition to the original building, it has become part of the overall exterior form of the building. The rear porch will be not be reconstructed. The porch was June 2021 MHBC | 45 2 - 44 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON a later sympathetic addition to the rear of the building. Although, it is part of the historic place, it is not a character-defining element in its own right. 3. Conserve heritage value by adopting an approach calling for minimal intervention. The development proposes to temporarily relocate the heritage building; although the foundation will be removed from the building and a new foundation created for the building upon its return, the identified character defining elements will be conserved. This approach requires the least intervention in order to retain its built form. 4. Recognize each historic place as a physical record of its time, place and use. Do not create a false sense of historical development by adding elements from other historic places or other properties, or by combining features of the same property that never existed. A false sense of historical development will not be created. The proposed development juxtaposes the existing heritage building and the new construction which is of a contemporary architectural style. 5. Find a use for an historic place that requires minimal or no change to its character-defining elements. The building will be used for residential purposes which is consistent with its former use. 6. Protect and, if necessary, stabilize an historic place until any subsequent intervention is undertaken. Protect and preserve archaeological resources in place. Where there is potential for disturbing archaeological resources, take mitigation measures to limit damage and loss of information. The heritage building is in good condition and does not require substantial conservation work. The building will be structurally protected and stabilized prior, during and post relocation until it is securing and structurally stabilized upon a new foundation at its original site. There are no archaeological resources perceived to be or identified on either the current site of the heritage building. 7. Evaluate the existing condition of character-defining elements to determine the appropriate intervention needed. Use the greatest means possible for any intervention. Respect heritage value when undertaking an intervention. Section 4.1.2 of this report evaluates the condition of character-defining elements of the heritage building. Any conservation work proceeding the building’s return to its original location should be consistent with the Standards and Guidelines of Historic Places in Canada (2011). June 2021 MHBC | 46 2 - 45 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON 8.Maintain character-defining elements on an ongoing basis. Repair character-defining elements by reinforcing their materials using recognized conservation methods. Replace in kind any extensively deteriorated or missing parts of character-defining elements, where there are surviving prototypes. An annual inspection of character-defining elements has been recommended in the long-term conservation goals of this report in Section 8.4. The character-defining elements of the heritage building are in good condition and do not require intervention; these elements only require on- going maintenance (maintenance is not considered intervention). 9. Make any intervention needed to preserve character defining elements physically and visually compatible with the historic place and identifiable on close inspection. Document any intervention for future reference. If, during the reconstruction of the front porch post relocation, there are portions of these character-defining elements that are in deteriorated condition in so much that they are no longer structurally viable, it is recommended that replacements be visually compatible to the heritage building and that these alterations be documented and included with the on-going maintenance log for the building. 10. Repair rather than replace character-defining elements. Where character-defining elements are too severely deteriorated to repair, and where sufficient physical evidence exists, replace them with new elements that match the forms, materials and detailing of sound versions of the same elements. Where there is insufficient physical evidence, make the form, material and detailing of the new elements compatible with the character of the historic place. The majority of the character-defining elements are in good condition and do not require replacement. If replacement is required, there is sufficient physical evidence to replace them with new elements that match the forms, materials and detailing of sound versions of the same elements. 11. Conserve the heritage value and character-defining elements when creating any new additions to an historic place or any related new construction. Make the new work physically and visually compatible with, subordinate to and distinguishable from the historic place. The proposed development will remove some building fabric on the south-eastern corner of 107 Young Street to facilitate the integration of the building within the overall development. The integration is intended to be physically and visually compatible by using materials and means of attachment that respect the existing building. The point of integration will be a juxtaposition between historic and contemporary architectural styles making it distinguishable from one another. June 2021 MHBC | 47 2 - 46 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON 12.Create any new additions or related new construction so that the essential form and integrity of an historic place will not be impaired if the new work is removed in the future The building fabric that will be removed from 107 Young Street is to be documented and inventoried and stored on-site so that it could be reversed in the future. 9.1. 2 Review and Application of the Guidelines The Standards and Guidelines (2011) provide specific guidelines regarding the conservation of elements of a historic place. The following guidelines for a) buildings and b) materials will be applied as it relates to the proposed development and the conservation of heritage attributes located on the subject lands. Guidelines for Buildings: Exterior Form; Exterior Walls; Windows Doors, and Storefronts; and Entrances, Porches and Balconies. Guidelines for Materials: All Materials; Wood and Wood Products; Masonry; Architectural and Structural Metals; and, Glass and Glass Products. 9.2 Eight Guiding Principles in the Conservation of Built Heritage Properties The following Eight Guiding Conservation Principles used by the Ontario Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport as well as the Ontario Heritage Trust will be evaluated in this report: 1. Respect for documentary evidence; Measured drawings and elevations for 107 Young Street have been completed to ensure that sufficient documentary evidence exists prior to relocation (see Appendix ‘I’ of this report). 2. Respect for historic material; Any repairs as part of the rehabilitation of 107 Young Street will be respectful of the existing historic material used. 3. Respect for original fabric; The proposed development will remove a portion of the south-eastern corner of 107 Young Street, however, the material be documented, salvaged, inventoried and stored on-site. 4. Reversibility; June 2021 MHBC | 48 2 - 47 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON See No.3 above. 5. Legibility; The proposed development is contemporary in design and will be legible in its integration with the existing building on-site. 6. Maintenance. This report includes a Conservation Plan which includes maintenance in its long-term conservation goals. 9.3 Region of Waterloo Practical Conservation Guides The Region of Waterloo provides practical guidelines regarding the conservation of heritage properties in the Region. These guidelines are consistent with the Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada. Applicable practical guidelines that may supplement the Parks Canada Standards and Guidelines reviewed above include: Masonry; Metalwork; Paint and Colour; Porches; Roofs; and, Windows/shutters/ doors. The Region of Waterloo outlines “Elements of Successful Infill” in Infill: New Construction in Heritage Neighbourhoods as part of their series, Practical Conservation Guide for Heritage Properties. The “Elements of Successful Infill” include: setback, scale, orientation, scale, proportion, rhythm, massing, height, materials, colour, roof shape, detail and ornamentation, landscape features, secondary buildings, and parking. These elements are incorporated into the CCNHCD Plan (2007) and associated policies and guidelines. June 2021 MHBC | 49 2 - 48 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON 10.0 Conclusions and Recommendations MHBC Planning, Urban Design and Landscape Architecture (“MHBC”) was retained by Facet Design Studio to undertake a Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) for the subject lands including 50-56 Weber Street West and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener. The proposed development includes an 8 storey building in lieu of 50-56 Weber Street West and the integration of 107 Young Street into the development. The following impacts were identified for both 107 Young Street specifically and the greater CCNHCD. Impacts The following lists impacts identified as it relates to the compliance with the CCNHCD policies and guidelines and impacts of development on existing and adjacent resources: Minor impact of alteration to 107 Young Street due to the removal of building fabric to facilitate the integration of the new building. This alteration impacts heritage attributes of the CCNHCD as it is to a well maintained, finely detailed building that is largely intact. Potential impact of land disturbances for 107 Young Street due to vibrations emitted from construction equipment once it is returned to its original location and construction continues to occur for the integration of the house into the new development. There is potential for physical damage to existing building during this phase (i.e. dust, debris, materials or equipment accidentally hitting exterior form). Potential impact of land disturbances for 48 Weber Street Westand 109 Young Street,which are a contributing, well maintained, largely intact buildings within the CCNHCD. The depth of excavation caused by the two level parking garage raises potential impacts of land disturbances to the foundation of both of these adjacent buildings. In conclusion, the proposed development meets the majority of the policies and guidelines for the CCNHCD resulting in its general compliancy with the Plan (2007). Mitigation Recommendations: Temporary Protection Plan which will include a Vibration Monitoring Plan for subject lands and adjacent properties; June 2021 MHBC | 55 2 - 49 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON Salvage and inventory of removed built heritage fabric extracted from 107 Young Street to facilitate the physical connection between the new construction and existing building; Monitoring of deconstruction of portion of 107 Young Street as part of the alteration; The rehabilitation of 107 Young Street must be consistent with the Parks Canada Standards and nd Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (2Edition) as outlined in Section 7.0 of this report and in accordance with Section 12.C.1.20 of the City’s Official Plan; it is recommended that work be completed by professionals who are members of the Canadian Association of Heritage Professionals (CAHP) who are familiar with these standards and guidelines and that MHBC monitor the progression of the rehabilitation; and, Materials extracted from the demolition of 50-56 Weber Street West and alteration to 107 Young Street should be repurposed within the development, if feasible. This includes materials such as: o Masonry; o Wood (i.e. flooring); o Original front door of 56 Weber Street West. CCNHCD: Exterior finishes and materials should be of high quality and consistent with the CCNHCD; their compatibility will be subject to Site Plan Review Committee approval through the Site Plan process; and, Lighting should be used to emphasis 107 Young Street along the streetscape, and signage should not obstruct significant views of 107 Young Street and the greater CCNHCD. June 2021 MHBC | 56 2 - 50 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON 11.0 Sources Berlin Today: Official Souvenir of the Best Town in Canada, 1906. Bloomfield, Elizabeth and Linda Foster. Waterloo County Councillors: A Collective Biography. Caribout Imprints, 1995. Bloomfield and Foster. Waterloo County Councillors: A Collective Biography. Caribou Imprints, 1995. Blumenson, John. Ontario Architecture: A Guide to Styles and Building Terms 1874 to the Present. Fitzhenry and Whiteside, 1990. City of Kitchener. Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District Study, 2006. Eby, Ezra. A Biographical History of Early Settlers and their Descendants in Waterloo Township. Kitchener, ON: Eldon D. Weber, 1971. English, John and Kenneth McLaughlin. Kitchener: An Illustrated History. Robin Brass Studio, 1996. Facet Design Studios. Site Plan, Renderings, Shadow Study and Angular Plane. (PDF) June 9, 2021. Google Maps & Google Earth Pro. 50-56 Weber Street West and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON. 2020. Government of Canada. Parks Canada. Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada. 2010. Hayes, Geoffrey. Waterloo County: An Illustrated History. Waterloo Historical Society, 1997. Heritage Resources Centre. Ontario Architectural Style Guide. University of Waterloo, 2009. mills, Rych. Kitchener (Berlin) 1880-1960. Arcadia Publishing, 2002. Ministry of Heritage, Sport, Tourism and Culture Industries. Ontario Heritage Tool Kit: Heritage Resources in the Land Use Planning Process, InfoSheet #2, Cultural Heritage Landscapes . Queens Printer for Ontario, 2006. Ministry of Heritage, Sport, Tourism and Culture Industries. InfoSheet#5 Heritage Impact Assessments and Conservation Plans, 2006 Moyer, Bill. Kitchener: Yesterday Revisited, An Illustrated History. Windsor Publications (Canada) Ltd., 1979. June 2021 MHBC | 57 2 - 51 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON n/a. Busy Berlin, Jubilee Souvenir. 1897. Region of Waterloo. Practical Conservation Guide for Heritage Properties. (PDF) Accessed December 10, 2019. Stantec Inc. City of Kitchener Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District Plan (PDF). August 2007. Uttley, W.V. (Ben), A History of Kitchener, Ontario. The Chronicle Press: Kitchener, 1937. W. V. Uttley and Gerald Noonan. A History of Kitchener., Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1975. June 2021 MHBC | 58 2 - 52 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON Appendix A- Maps of the Subject Land June 2021 MHBC | 59 2 - 53 107 Young St 56 Weber St W 50-52 Weber St W Legend Date: Location Map Scale: File: ± Drawn: Document Path: K:\\17191A- Weber St\\RPT\\Aerial_Location.mxd 2 - 54 2 - 55 2 - 56 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON Appendix B- Site Plan and Elevations June 2021 MHBC | 60 2 - 57 2 - 58 2 - 59 2 - 60 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON Appendix C-Renderings June 2021 MHBC | 61 2 - 61 2 - 62 2 - 63 2 - 64 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON Appendix D-Shadow Study June 2021 MHBC | 62 2 - 65 61.67!Xfcfs Tibepx!Jnqbdu!Tuvez March SUN RISE 7:26 SUN SET 19:38 8:00 am10:00 am XX FF CC FF // SS UU !! TT TUTU !! // !! XX HH // OO VV PP ZZ 12:00 pm4:00 pm XX FF CC FF // SS UU !! TT TT UU !! // !! XX HH // OO VV PP ZZ NORTH Legend EXISTING BUILDINGSPROPOSED BUILDING gbdfu!! design studio ltd. 2 - 66 61.67!Xfcfs Tibepx!Jnqbdu!Tuvez June SUN RISE 5:46 SUN SET 21:08 8:00 am10:00 am XX FF CC FF // SS UU !! TT TUTU !! // !! XX HH // OO VV PP ZZ 12:00 pm4:00 pm XX FF CC FF // SS UU !! TT TT UU !! // !! XX HH // OO VV PP ZZ NORTHNORTH Legend EXISTING BUILDINGSPROPOSED BUILDING gbdfu!! design studio ltd. 2 - 67 61.67!Xfcfs Tibepx!Jnqbdu!Tuvez September SUN RISE 7:11 SUN SET 19:24 8:00 am10:00 am XX FF CC FF // SS UU !! TT TUTU !! // !! XX HH // OO VV PP ZZ 12:00 pm4:00 pm XX FF CC FF // SS UU !! TT TT UU !! // !! XX HH // OO VV PP ZZ NORTHNORTH Legend EXISTING BUILDINGSPROPOSED BUILDING gbdfu!! design studio ltd. 2 - 68 61.67!Xfcfs Tibepx!Jnqbdu!Tuvez December SUN RISE 7:53 SUN SET 16:53 8:00 am10:00 am XX FF CC FF // SS UU !! TT TUTU !! // !! XX HH // OO VV PP ZZ 12:00 pm4:00 pm XX FF CC FF // SS UU !! TT TT UU !! // !! XX HH // OO VV PP ZZ NORTHNORTH Legend EXISTING BUILDINGSPROPOSED BUILDING gbdfu!! design studio ltd. 2 - 69 61.67!Xfcfs Tibepx!Jnqbdu!Tuvez March SUN RISE 7:26 SUN SET 19:38 Additional Hours 1:00 pm2:00 pm XX FF CC FF // SS UU !! TT TUTU !! // !! XX HH // OO VV PP ZZ 3:00 pm5:00 pm XX FF CC FF // SS UU !! TT TT UU !! // !! XX HH // OO VV PP ZZ NORTHNORTH Legend EXISTING BUILDINGSPROPOSED BUILDING gbdfu!! design studio ltd. 2 - 70 61.67!Xfcfs Tibepx!Jnqbdu!Tuvez Shadow Length Calculations March 21 June 21 gbdfu design studio ltd. 2 - 71 61.67!Xfcfs Tibepx!Jnqbdu!Tuvez Shadow Length Calculations September 21 December 21 11:00 am (adjusted for daylight savings time) gbdfu design studio ltd. 2 - 72 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON Appendix E-Angular Plane Study June 2021 MHBC | 63 2 - 73 6/1 MJOF QSPQFSUZ! 2/92/9 6 5 1/6 DFOUSF!MJOF!PGSPZ!TUSFFU 8/1 1/6 2/92/9 4/1 F 7/1 O B M Q ! S B M V H O B MJOF 4/1 QSPQFSUZ! 8/6 8 STOREYS Notes:All dimensions shown are in metres. QSPQPTFE!CVJMEJOH MJOF 2/6! QSPQFSUZ! 38/1!N DFOUFS!MJOF!PGXFCFS!!TUSFFU 2 - 74 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON Appendix F- Structural Condition Report (Tacoma Engineers, 2018) and Relocation Report (Tacoma Engineers, February, 2020) June 2021 MHBC | 64 2 - 75 2 - 76 UF.44895.2: GFC!31.31 2 - 77 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON Appendix G-Laurie McCulloch Building Moving Report, March 2020 June 2021 MHBC | 65 2 - 78 960 Taunton Rd E Whitby, ON L1R 3L8 Laurie McCulloch Phone: (905) 728-0884 Fax: (905) 743-0528 Building Moving info@mccullochmovers.ca Monday, March 2, 2020 John Gibson The Tri-City Group of Companies 4-368 Phillip Street Waterloo, Ontario N2L 5J1 519-240-1957 Budgetary Quotation RE: 107 Young Street Kitchener Background The building to be retained is approximately 37’ X 42’ X 1 and 1/2 storey solid brick Ontario Cottage style house moving out onto street to allow for underground parking to be completed. Site Preparation Excavation of site to allow steel placement down to footing level will be done by others. Any demolition or site clearing to occur will also be done by others Loading Procedure 1. clean basement, disconnect services and remove fixtures (furnace, stairs etc.) 2. 3. insert main beams under building 4. level beams and install jacking and safety cribs under each beam 5. insert cross beams at each end through the mains to carry the needle beams 6. grout the cross beam ends to the underside of the cut line as well as the interior masonry walls 7. insert the needle beams, pack and grout to the brick line 8. with the two end walls loaded and packed open holes on each side and insert one cross loader at a time packing and grouting into place as you go 9. the first floor joist will also be packed to the cross beams 10. install any necessary bracing for weak points in doorways, etc. 11. connect the jacks and raise building 1 inch with our unified jacking machine 12. remove basement support points between cross beams and insert safety needles 2 - 79 Laurie McCulloch Building Moving 2 13. install roll steel and multi directional Hillman rollers to slide building out onto street 14. move building desired distance crib off and remove roll steel 15. Once parking garage is completed 16. Reinstall roll steel and multi directional Hillman rollers to slide building out back into final location 17. hold in place while basement completed by others 18. once basement complete relieve steel framework and remove Rolling Multi directional Hillman rollers are placed between the main beams and roll steel for the move. The 50 ton capacity rollers will be installed based on the actual weight of the loaded building including steel. The actual weight will be determined once the building is loaded on our equipment with our hydraulic equipment and verified by David Seberras to ensure that an adequate safety ratio for the rolling equipment is maintained. Foundation An adequate height foundation will need to be built up to the underside of the brick to pin the building in its final location by others. We will assist in the design of new foundation walls to make sure the design facilitates the removal of our steel framework. Placement After the building is at its desired location and elevation, the new concrete foundation wall is installed leaving openings for the main beam removal. Scope of Work Install steel framework Lift building free of current foundation Relocate to storage location Relocate to final location Place according to your surveyors marks Hold building in place to while basement built by others Remove steel framework 2 - 80 Laurie McCulloch Building Moving 3 Exclusions The following are not in our scope: Cleaning out of current basement of all organic materials Permits Road Occupancy cost such as police, local utility company costs for wire raising, hoarding, pedestrian protection Foundations for building Any demolition required Excavation around the perimeter of the building down to footing level to allow for placement of steel beams Excavation for foundation Service disconnections and reconnections Surveyors required permanent building placement Assumptions The following is assumed in the pricing Adequate laydown area for relocationsteel and equipment Onsite parking for company trucks Temporary power and water Minimum six ft basement under current structure and new foundation Cost The cost for the relocation will be approx. Two Hundred Twenty-Six Thousand Plus HST Based on builder supplied information of photos and dimensions. Yours Truly Greg Mcculloch Greg McCulloch Laurie McCulloch Building Moving 2 - 81 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON Appendix H- HIA Phase II Terms of Reference June 2021 MHBC | 66 2 - 82 City of Kitchener Development Services Department Planning Division 50-56 Weber Street West & 107 Young Street Phase II Heritage Impact Assessment and Urban Design ReportScoped Terms of Reference 1.0Background A Heritage Impact Assessment(HIA)is a study to determine the impacts to known and potential cultural heritage resources within a defined area proposed for future repair, alteration or development. The study shall include an inventory of all cultural heritage resources within the planning application area. The study results in a report which identifies all known cultural heritage resources, evaluates the significance of the resources, and makes recommendations toward mitigative measures that would minimize negative impacts to those resources. A Heritage Impact Ontario Heritage Act;or where development is proposed adjacent to a protected heritage property. The requirement may also apply to unknown or recorded cultural heritage resources which are discovered during the development application stage or construction. An Urban Design Report establishesa vision and givesclear direction for the future development of the site. It will provide the City, applicant and public with reasonable assurance as to what the future form of development may look like by establishing guidelines for future site development. The Reportwill supplement and reinforce existing design policies with site-specific design guidelines for the proposed future development. The Urban Design Report should use graphics, images and text to explore a concept and explain why a proposeddevelopment represents the optimum design solution. The Report should reflect an optimal design solution and not simply reflect a preferred development scheme. 2.0Heritage Impact Assessment Requirements It is important to recognize the need for Heritage Impact Assessments at the earliest possible stage of development, alteration or proposed repair. Notice will be given to the property owner and/or their representative as early as possible. When the property is the subject of a Plan of Subdivision or Site Plan application, notice of a Heritage Impact Assessment requirement will typically be given at the pre-application meeting, followed by written notification. The notice will inform the property owner of any known heritage resources specific to the subject property and provide guidelines to completing the Heritage Impact Assessment. The City will require the submission and approval of a scoped Heritage Impact Assessment and Urban Design Reportto address the potential impact of the proposed developmenton the heritage attributes of the property municipally addressed as 107 Young Street and on the attributes associated with the Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District (CCNHCD), and specifically the context of the surrounding streetscape/neighbourhood. These Terms of Reference for the HIA/UDR have been scoped to waive certain requirements which were previously addressed in the Phase I HIA submitted regarding the demolition of the buildings at 50-52 and 56 Weber Street West.Similarly, somemore detailed components of a standard Urban Design Report will be replaced with the completion of the Urban Design Score Card. 2 - 83 The following minimum requirements will be required in a Phase II Scoped Heritage Impact Assessmentand Urban Design Report: 2.1Description of site and surrounding features, including photographs and a written description of the subject property. 2.2An outline of the proposed development, its context, and how it will impact the subject property and surrounding streetscape (including existing buildings, structures, and site details such as landscaping). In particular, the potential visual and physical impact of the proposed work on the identified heritage attributes of the subject property, the setting and character of the Weber Street and Young Street streetscapes, and the integrity of the CCNHCDshall be evaluated. Specific attention should be given to issues relating to location, scale, massing, and views along Weber Street and Young Street and compatibility with existing neighbourhood buildingsand landscape. A discussion and assessment of the proposed building materials, proposed setbacksand step backswith respect to the surrounding neighbourhood is required. A discussion and assessment of functional considerations such as the location of landscape features amenity space, pedestrian andvehicle movements, fire access and garbage collectionshould be provided. 2.3A Shadow Analysis should be conducted to inform building design and articulation 2.4A Wind Analysis using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) should be conducted and specifically consider at grade entrances and amenity spaces as well as balconies and rooftop amenity space. 2.5TheAssessment/Report should consider and address the Official Plan policies proposed through the Civic Centre Neighbourhood Planning Review, including, but not limited to Sections 16.D.2.11 through 16.D.2.22(especially 16.D.2.11,16.D.2.14, 16.D.2.15, 16.D.2.17, 16.D.2.18, 16.D.2.21),16.D.3.3,and Section 15.D.4 (especially 15.4.5, 15.4.6, 15.4.7, 15.4.12). In addition, the Assessment/Report should considerSection 11 (Urban Design) and Section 12 (Cultural Heritage Resources) of the Official Plan. 2.6Consideration and evaluation of options that mitigate impact. Methods of mitigation may include, but are not limited to, preservation/conservation in situ, rehabilitation, adaptive re- use, relocation, and alternative development approaches to design (height, massing, scale, location, setbacks, stepbacks, etc.). Each mitigative measure should create a sympathetic context for the heritage resource. 2.7A summary of applicable heritage conservation principles and how they will be used must be included. Conservation principles may be found in online publications such as: the Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (Parks Canada); Eight Guiding Principles in the Conservation of Built Heritage Properties (Ministry of Heritage, Tourism, Sport, and Culture Industries); and the Ontario Heritage Tool Kit (Ministry of Heritage, Tourism, Sport, and Culture Industries). 2.8Proposed alterations and relocation must be justified and explained including discussion on any loss of cultural heritage value and impact on the property, streetscape, and neighbourhood. Conclusions or statements regarding structural or general condition, required repairs, and feasibility of location, shall be supported by reports and cost estimates prepared by qualified individuals. 2 - 84 2.9Recommendations shall be consistent with applicable CCNHCD Plan policies and guidelines, including sections 3.3.5.2, 6.9.4 and 6.9.5 of the CCNHCD Planand The Urban Design Manual including the following section in Part A: City-Wide Design,Residential Infill in Central Neighbourhoods,Mid-Rise BuildingsandStructured Parking. Recommendations shall be as specific as possible, describing and illustrating recommended locations, elevations, materials, landscaping, etc., and consider the tools available underthe subject Planning application to implement recommendations and conservation measures (e.g. conditions of site plan approval). The report shall also cite how the recommendations are consistent with recognized heritage conservation principles and practices, including the Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (Parks Canada); Eight Guiding Principles in the Conservation of Built Heritage Properties (Ministry of Heritage, Tourism, Sport, and Culture Industries); and the Ontario Heritage Tool Kit (Ministry of Heritage, Tourism, Sport, and Culture Industries). 2.10The qualifications and background of the person(s) completing the Heritage Impact Assessment and Urban Design Report shall be included in the report. The author(s) must demonstrate a level of professional understanding and competence in the heritage conservation field of study. The report will also include a reference for any literature cited, and a list of people contacted during the study and referenced in the report. 3.0Summary Statement and Conservation Recommendations The summary statement should provide a full description of: The significance and heritage attributes of the subject properties; The identification of any impact the proposed developmentwill have on the heritage attributes of the subject properties, adjacent properties, the Weber Street and Young Street streetscapes, and the integrity of the CCNHCD; and An explanation of what conservation or mitigative measures, alternative development, or site alteration approaches are recommended, and the way in which such recommendations can be implemented through the Planning process. 4.0Approval Process Five (5) hard copies of the Heritage Impact Assessment and one digital pdf copy shall be provided to Heritage Planning and Urban Design staff. Both the hard and digital copies ent / Urban Design Reportwill be reviewed by City staff to determine whether all requirements have been met and to review the preferred option(s). Following the review of the Heritage Impact Assessment / Urban Design Report by City staff, five (5) hard copies and one digital copy of the final Heritage Impact Assessment / Urban Design Report watermark removed) will be required. The copies of the final Heritage Impact Assessment / Urban Design Report will be considered by the Director of Planning. Note that Heritage information and discussion. It is recommended that the Heritage Impact Assessment / Urban Design Report be submitted a minimum of three (3) weeks prior to a scheduled Heritage Kitchener Committee meeting. A Site Plan Review Committee meeting may not opportunity to review and provide feedback to City staff. 2 - 85 Heritage Impact Assessments/ Urban Design Reportmay be subject to a peer review to be conducted by a qualified heritage consultant at the expense of the City of Kitchener. report. An accepted Heritage Impact Assessment/ Urban Design Reportwill become part of the further processing of a development application under the direction of the Planning Division. The recommendations within the final approved version of the Heritage Impact Assessment / Urban Design Report may be incorporated into development related legal agreements between the City and the proponent at the discretion of the municipality. 2 - 86 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON Appendix I-Measured Drawings and Elevations June 2021 MHBC | 67 2 - 87 2 - 88 2 - 89 Heritage Impact Assessment Report Phase I 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON Appendix G-Curricula Vitae March 13,2020 MHBC | 110 2 - 90 WJUBF! ! Ebo!Dvssjf-!CB-!CFT-!NB-!NDJQ-!SQQ-!DBIQ! Ebo!Dvssjf-!b!Qbsuofs!xjui!NICD-!kpjofe!NICD!Qmboojoh!jo!311:-!bgufs!ibwjoh! FEVDBUJPO xpslfe!jo!wbsjpvt!qptjujpot!jo!uif!qvcmjd!tfdups!tjodf!2::8!jodmvejoh!uif!Ejsfdups! pg!Qpmjdz!Qmboojoh!gps!uif!Djuz!pg!Dbncsjehf!boe!Tfojps!Qpmjdz!Qmboofs!gps!uif!Djuz! 3117! pg!Xbufsmpp/!!!!! Nbtufst!pg!Bsut!)Qmboojoh*! ! Vojwfstjuz!pg!Xbufsmpp! Ebo!qspwjeft!b!wbsjfuz!pg!qmboojoh!tfswjdft!gps!qvcmjd!boe!qsjwbuf!tfdups!dmjfout! ! jodmvejoh!b!xjef!sbohf!pg!qpmjdz!boe!efwfmpqnfou!xpsl/!Ebo!ibt!fyqfsjfodf!jo!b! 2::9! ovncfs!pg!bsfbt!jodmvejoh!tusbufhjd!qmboojoh-!hspxui!qmbo!qpmjdz-!tfdpoebsz! Cbdifmps!pg!Fowjsponfoubm!Tuvejft! qmbot-!xbufstife!qmbot-!ipvtjoh!tuvejft!boe!epxoupxo!sfwjubmj{bujpo!qmbot/!Ebo! Vojwfstjuz!pg!Xbufsmpp! tqfdjbmj{ft!jo!mpoh!sbohf!qmboojoh!boe!ibt!fyqfsjfodf!jo!hspxui!qmbot-!tfuumfnfou! ! bsfb!fyqbotjpot!boe!vscbo!hspxui!tuvejft/!! 2::9! ! Cbdifmps!pg!Bsut!)Bsu!Ijtupsz*! Ebo!ipmet!b!Nbtufst!efhsff!jo!Qmboojoh!gspn!uif!Vojwfstjuz!pg!Xbufsmpp-!b! Vojwfstjuz!pg!Tbtlbudifxbo! Cbdifmpst!efhsff!)Ipopvst*!jo!Qmboojoh!gspn!uif!Vojwfstjuz!pg!Xbufsmpp!boe!b! ! Cbdifmps!pg!Bsut!efhsff!gspn!uif!Vojwfstjuz!pg!Tbtlbudifxbo/!If!jt!b!sfhjtufsfe! Qspgfttjpobm!Qmboofs!boe!b!Nfncfs!pg!uif!Dbobejbo!Jotujuvuf!pg!Qmboofst!boe!b! Qspgfttjpobm!Nfncfs!pg!uif!Dbobejbo!Bttpdjbujpo!pg!Ifsjubhf!Qspgfttjpobmt/! ! ! QSPGFTTJPOBM!BTTPDJBUJPOT! ! Gvmm!Nfncfs-!Dbobejbo!Jotujuvuf!pg!Qmboofst! Gvmm!Nfncfs-!Poubsjp!Qspgfttjpobm!Qmboofst!Jotujuvuf! Qspgfttjpobm!Nfncfs-!Dbobejbo!Bttpdjbujpo!pg!Ifsjubhf!Qspgfttjpobmt! Qbtu!Cpbse!Nfncfs-!Upxo!boe!Hpxo!Bttpdjbujpo!pg!Poubsjp!! ! ! QSPGFTTJPOBM!IJTUPSZ! ! 3124!—!Qsftfou!Qbsuofs-!! !!NbdObvhiupo!Ifsntfo!Csjuupo!Dmbsltpo!Qmboojoh!Mjnjufe!! ! 311:!—!3124!Bttpdjbuf! !!NbdObvhiupo!Ifsntfo!Csjuupo!Dmbsltpo!Qmboojoh!Mjnjufe!! ! 3118!.!311:!Ejsfdups-!Qpmjdz!Qmboojoh-!Djuz!pg!Dbncsjehf! DPOUBDU! !! ! 651!Cjohfnbot!Dfousf!Esjwf-!! !! Tvjuf!311! 3111!.!3118!Tfojps!Qmboofs-!Djuz!pg!Xbufsmpp! Ljudifofs-!PO!O3C!4Y:! ! U!62:!687!4761!y!855! G!62:!687!1232! edvssjfAnicdqmbo/dpn! xxx/nicdqmbo/dpn! 2! 2 - 91 WJUBF! ! Ebo!Dvssjf-!CB-!CFT-!NB-!NDJQ-!SQQ-!DBIQ! 2:::!.!3111!Qmboofs-!Djuz!pg!Xbufsmpp! ! 2::8!.!2::9!Sftfbsdi!Qmboofs-!Djuz!pg!Ljudifofs! ! ! TFMFDUFE!QSPKFDU!FYQFSJFODF! ! NBTUFS!QMBOT-!HSPXUI!NBOBHFNFOU!TUSBUFHJFT!BOE!QPMJDZ!TUVEJFT! ! Upxotijq!pg!Xftu!Mjodpmo-!Tnjuiwjmmf!Opsuixftu!Rvbesbou!Tfdpoebsz!Qmbo! Upxotijq!pg!Ujoz!Hspxui!Nbobhfnfou!Tusbufhz!boe!Vscbo!Fyqbotjpo!Bobmztjt! Ojbhbsb.po.uif.Mblf!Nbsz!Tusffu!Tusffutdbqf!Tuvez! Sjdinpoe!Ijmm-!Cpoe!Dsftdfou!Joufotjgjdbujpo!Tusbufhz! Djuz!pg!Dbncsjehf!Dmjnbuf!Dibohf!Bebqubujpo!Qpmjdz! Njojtusz!pg!Jogsbtusvduvsf!Qjmpu!Uftu!pg!Hspxui!Qmbo!Joejdbupst!Tuvez! Dbncsjehf!Xftu!Nbtufs!Fowjsponfoubm!Tfswjdjoh!Qmbo!! Upxotijq!pg!Ujoz!Sftjefoujbm!Mboe!Vtf!Tuvez!! Upxotijq!pg!Xftu!Mjodpmo!Tfuumfnfou!Bsfb!Fyqbotjpo!Bobmztjt!! Qpsu!Tfwfso!Tfuumfnfou!Bsfb!Cpvoebsz!Sfwjfx!! Djuz!pg!Dbncsjehf!Hsffo!Cvjmejoh!Qpmjdz!! Upxotijq!pg!Xftu!Mjodpmo!Joufotjgjdbujpo!Tuvez!'!Fnqmpznfou!Mboe!Tusbufhz!! Njojtusz!pg!uif!Fowjsponfou!Sfwjfx!pg!uif!E.Tfsjft!Mboe!Vtf!Hvjefmjoft!! Nfbepxmboet!Dpotfswbujpo!Bsfb!Nbobhfnfou!Qmbo!! Djuz!pg!Dbncsjehf!Usbjmt!Nbtufs!Qmbo!! Djuz!pg!Lbxbsuib!Mblft!Hspxui!Nbobhfnfou!Tusbufhz!! Djuz!pg!Dbncsjehf!Hspxui!Nbobhfnfou!Tusbufhz!! Dbncsjehf!HP!Usbjo!Gfbtjcjmjuz!Tuvez!! Djuz!pg!Xbufsmpp!Ifjhiu!boe!Efotjuz!Qpmjdz!! Djuz!pg!Xbufsmpp!Tuvefou!Bddpnnpebujpo!Tuvez!! Vqupxo!Xbufsmpp!Sftjefoujbm!Nbslfu!Tuvez!!! Djuz!pg!Xbufsmpp!Mboe!Tvqqmz!Tuvez!! Djuz!pg!Ljudifofs!Joofs!Djuz!Ipvtjoh!Tuvez!!! DPOUBDU! ! 651!Cjohfnbot!Dfousf!Esjwf-!! Tvjuf!311! Ljudifofs-!PO!O3C!4Y:! U!62:!687!4761!y!855! G!62:!687!1232! edvssjfAnicdqmbo/dpn! xxx/nicdqmbo/dpn! 3! 2 - 92 WJUBF! ! Ebo!Dvssjf-!CB-!CFT-!NB-!NDJQ-!SQQ-!DBIQ! ! IFSJUBHF!QMBOOJOH!! ! Upxo!pg!Dpcpvsh!Ifsjubhf!Nbtufs!Qmbo!! Nvojdjqbmjuz!pg!Dibuibn.Lfou!Spoefbv!Ifsjubhf!Dpotfswbujpo!Ejtusjdu!Qmbo! Djuz!pg!Nbslibn!Wjdupsjb!Trvbsf!Ifsjubhf!Dpotfswbujpo!Ejtusjdu!Tuvez! Djuz!pg!Ljohtupo!Cbssjfgjfme!Ifsjubhf!Dpotfswbujpo!Ejtusjdu!Qmbo! Cvsmjohupo!Ifjhiut!Ifsjubhf!Mboet!Nbobhfnfou!Qmbo!! Upxotijq!pg!Nvtlplb!Mblft-!Cbmb!Ifsjubhf!Dpotfswbujpo!Ejtusjdu!Tuvez!boe!Qmbo! Nvojdjqbmjuz!pg!Nfbgpse-!Epxoupxo!Nfbgpse!Ifsjubhf!Dpotfswbujpo!Ejtusjdu!Qmbo!! Djuz!pg!Hvfmqi!Cspplmzo!boe!Dpmmfhf!Ijmm!Ifsjubhf!Dpotfswbujpo!Ejtusjdu!Qmbo! Ojbhbsb!Qfojotvmb!Dpotfswbujpo!Bvuipsjuz!Tu!Kpio“t!Nbtufs!Qmbo! Djuz!pg!Upspoup!Hbsefo!Ejtusjdu!Ifsjubhf!Dpotfswbujpo!Ejtusjdu!Tuvez!boe!Qmbo! Djuz!pg!Mpoepo!Xftufso!Dpvoujft!Dvmuvsbm!Ifsjubhf!Qmbo!! Djuz!pg!Dbncsjehf!Ifsjubhf!Nbtufs!Qmbo!! Djuz!pg!Xbufsmpp!Nbsz.Bmmfo!Ofjhicpvsippe!Ifsjubhf!Ejtusjdu!Tuvez!! Djuz!pg!Xbufsmpp!Svnnfmibseu!Tdippm!Ifsjubhf!Eftjhobujpo!! Puifs!ifsjubhf!dpotvmujoh!tfswjdft!jodmvejoh;! Ifsjubhf!Jnqbdu!Bttfttnfout! Sfrvftut!gps!Eftjhobujpot! Bmufsbujpot!ps!ofx!efwfmpqnfout!xjuijo!Ifsjubhf!Dpotfswbujpo!Ejtusjdut! ! ! EFWFMPQNFOU!QMBOOJOH! ! Qspwjef!dpotvmujoh!tfswjdft!boe!qsfqbsf!qmboojoh!bqqmjdbujpot!gps!qsjwbuf!tfdups! dmjfout!gps;!! Esbgu!qmbot!pg!tvcejwjtjpo! Dpotfou! Pggjdjbm!Qmbo!Bnfoenfou! \[pojoh!Cz.mbx!Bnfoenfou! Njops!Wbsjbodf! Tjuf!Qmbo! ! ! ! DPOUBDU! ! 651!Cjohfnbot!Dfousf!Esjwf-!! Tvjuf!311! Ljudifofs-!PO!O3C!4Y:! U!62:!687!4761!y!855! G!62:!687!1232! edvssjfAnicdqmbo/dpn! xxx/nicdqmbo/dpn! 4! 2 - 93 DVSSJDVMVN WJUBF Wbofttb!Ijdlt-!N/B/-!D/B/I/Q/ Wbofttb!Ijdlt!jt!b!Ifsjubhf!Qmboofs!xjui!NICD!boe!kpjofe!uif!gjsn!bgufs!ibwjoh! FEVDBUJPO hbjofe!fyqfsjfodf!bt!b!Nbobhfs!pg!Ifsjubhf!Qmboojoh!jo!uif!qvcmjd!sfbmn! xifsf!tif!xbt!sftqpotjcmf!gps!xpsljoh!xjui!Ifsjubhf!Bewjtpsz!Dpnnjuufft!jo! 3127 nbobhjoh!ifsjubhf!sftpvsdft-!Ifsjubhf!Dpotfswbujpo!Ejtusjdut-!eftjhobujpot-! Nbtufs!pg!Bsut!jo!Qmboojoh-! tqfdjbm!fwfout!boe!ifsjubhf!qspkfdut!)tvdi!bt!uif!Bsdijufduvsbm!Tbmwbhf! tqfdjbmj{joh!jo!Ifsjubhf! Qsphsbn*/! Qmboojoh Wbofttb!jt!b!nfncfs!pg!uif!Dbobejbo!Bttpdjbujpo!pg!Ifsjubhf!Qspgfttjpobmt!boe! Vojwfstjuz!pg!Xbufsmpp-! hsbevbufe!gspn!uif!Vojwfstjuz!pg!Xbufsmpp!xjui!b!Nbtufst!Efhsff!jo!Qmboojoh- Tdippm!pg!Qmboojoh tqfdjbmj{joh!jo!ifsjubhf!qmboojoh!boe!dpotfswbujpo/!Wbofttb!qspwjeft!b!wbsjfuz! pg!sftfbsdi!boe!sfqpsu!xsjujoh!tfswjdft!gps!qvcmjd!boe!qsjwbuf!tfdups!dmjfout/!Tif! 3121 ibt!fyqfsjfodf!jo!ijtupsjdbm!sftfbsdi-!jowfoupsz!xpsl-!fwbmvbujpo!boe!bobmztjt! Cbdifmps!pg!Bsut!)Ipopvst*!jo! po!b!wbsjfuz!pg!qspkfdut-!jodmvejoh!Ifsjubhf!Dpotfswbujpo!Ejtusjdut!)IDEt*- Ijtupsjdbm0Joevtusjbm! Ifsjubhf!Jnqbdu!Bttfttnfout!)IJBt*-Dvmuvsbm!Ifsjubhf!Fwbmvbujpo!Sfqpsut! Bsdibfpmphz )DIFSt*-!Dpotfswbujpo!Qmbot!)DQt*-!Epdvnfoubujpo!boe!Tbmwbhf!Sfqpsut-!boe! Xjmgsje!Mbvsjfs!Vojwfstjuz Dpnnfnpsbujpo!Qspkfdut!)j/f/!qmbrvft*/!Wbofttb!jt!bmtp!bcmf!up!dpnnfou! qspwjef!dpnnfout!sfhbsejoh!Tubhft!2.5!Bsdibfpmphjdbm!Bttfttnfout!evf!up! ifs!fyqfsjfodf!bt!b!qsbdujdjoh!gjfme!bsdibfpmphjtu!boe!fyqfsjfodf!xsjujoh! bsdibfpmphjdbm!sfqpsut!tvcnjuufe!up!uif!Njojtusz!pg!Upvsjtn-!Dvmuvsf!boe!tqpsu/! QSPGFTTJPOBM!BTTPDJBUJPOT! Qspgfttjpobm!Nfncfs-!Dbobejbo!Bttpdjbujpo!pg!Ifsjubhf!Qspgfttjpobmt! QSPGFTTJPOBM!FYQFSJFODF! Kvof!3127!.!!Dvmuvsbm!Ifsjubhf!Tqfdjbmjtu0Ifsjubhf!Qmboofs! Qsftfou!!NbdObvhiupo!Ifsntfo!Csjuupo!Dmbsltpo!Qmboojoh!Mue/! 3123!.!!Qsphsbn!Nbobhfs-!Ifsjubhf!Qmboojoh! 3127!!Upxo!pg!Bvspsb! Nbz!3123!.!Ifsjubhf!Qmboojoh!Bttjtubou! DPOUBDU Pdupcfs!3123!Upxo!pg!Hsjntcz! 651!Cjohfnbot!Dfousf!Esjwf-! !! Tvjuf!311 3118!.!!Bsdibfpmphjtu! Ljudifofs-!PO!O3C!4Y: U!62:!687!4761!y!839 3121!!Bsdibfpmphjdbm!Sftfbsdi!Bttpdjbuft!Mue/! G!62:!687!1232 wijdltAnicdqmbo/dpn xxx/nicdqmbo/dpn 2! 2 - 94 DVSSJDVMVN WJUBF Wbofttb!Ijdlt-!N/B/-!D/B/I/Q/ TFMFDU!QSPKFDU!FYQFSJFODF! IFSJUBHF!JNQBDU!BTTFTTNFOUT!)IJBt*!3127.312: Ifsjubhf!Jnqbdu!Bttfttnfou!.! Dbncsjehf! Ifsjubhf!Jnqbdu!Bttfttnfou!!Cbemfz!Csjehf-!qbsu!pg!b!Nvojdjqbm!FB!Dmbtt! Bttfttnfou-!Upxotijq!pg!Dfousf!Xfmmjohupo! Ifsjubhf!Jnqbdu!Bttfttnfou!!585!boe!595!Rvffo!Tusffu!Tpvui!)boe! Tdiofjefs!Ibvt!Obujpobm!Ijtupsjd!Tjuf*-!Djuz!pg!Ljudifofs! Ifsjubhf!Jnqbdu!Bttfttnfou!!994!Eppo!Wjmmbhf!Spbe-!Djuz!pg!Ljudifofs! Ifsjubhf!Jnqbdu!Bttfttnfou!!68!Mblfqpsu!Spbe-!Djuz!pg!Tu/!Dbuibsjoft! Ifsjubhf!Jnqbdu!Bttfttnfou!!Mbohnbjet!Jtmboe-!Mblf!pg!Cbzt! Ifsjubhf!Jnqbdu!Bttfttnfou!!278:!Cmbjs!Spbe-!Djuz!pg!Dbncsjehf! Ifsjubhf!Jnqbdu!Bttfttnfou!.75!Nbshbsfu!Bwfovf-!Djuz!pg!Ljudifofs! DVMUVSBM!IFSJUBHF!FWBMVBUJPO!SFQPSUT!)DIFSt*!3127.312: Dvmuvsbm!Ifsjubhf!Fwbmvbujpo!Sfqpsu!.!Evompq!Tusffu!Xftu!boe!Csbegpse!Tusffu-! Cbssjf!.!Qsjodf!pg!Xbmft!Tdippm!boe!Cbssjf!Dfousbm!Dpmmfhjbuf!Jotujuvuf! Dvmuvsbm!Ifsjubhf!Fwbmvbujpo!Sfqpsu!.!Mblftipsf!Esjwf-!Upxo!pg!Pblwjmmf! Dvmuvsbm!Ifsjubhf!Fwbmvbujpo!Sfqpsu!!Rvffo!Wjdupsjb!Qbsl!Dvmuvsbm!Ifsjubhf!! IFSJUBHF!DPOTFSWBUJPO!EJTUSJDUT!)IDEt*! Ifsjubhf!Dpotfswbujpo!Ejtusjdu!Tuvez!!Tpvuifbtu!Pme!Bvspsb!)Upxo!pg!Bvspsb*! DPOTFSWBUJPO!QMBOT! Tusbufhjd!Dpotfswbujpo!Qmbo!!Rvffo!Wjdupsjb!Qbsl!Dvmuvsbm!Ifsjubhf! Mboetdbqf! EPDVNFOUBUJPO!BOE!TBMWBHF!SFQPSUT! Epdvnfoubujpo!boe!Tbmwbhf!Sfqpsu!'!Dpnnfnpsbujpo!Qmbo!!585!boe!595! Rvffo!Tusffu!Tpvui-!Djuz!pg!Ljudifofs! DPOUBDU TQFDJBM!QSPKFDUT! 651!Cjohfnbot!Dfousf!Esjwf-! Bsujgbdu!Ejtqmbz!Dbtf!!.!Uisff!Csfxfst!Sftubvsbou)386!Zpohf!Tu/-!Upspoup*! Tvjuf!311 Ljudifofs-!PO!O3C!4Y: U!62:!687!4761!y!839 G!62:!687!1232 wijdltAnicdqmbo/dpn xxx/nicdqmbo/dpn 3! 2 - 95 CURRICULUM VITAE Rachel Redshaw, MA, H.E. Dipl. Rachel Redshaw, a Heritage Planerwith MHBC, joined the firm in 2018. Ms. EDUCATION Redshaw has a Bachelor of Arts in Anthropology and Celtic Studies and a Master of Arts in World Heritage and Cultural Projects for Development.Ms. 2011 Redshaw completed her Master’s inTurin, Italy; the Master’s program was Higher Education Diploma establishedbyUNESCO in conjunction with the University of Turin and the Cultural Development/ Gaelic International Training Centre of the ILO.Rachel is member of the Canadian Studies Association of Heritage Professionals. Sabhal Mòr Ostaig, University of the Highlands and Islands Ms.Redshaw provides a variety of heritage planning services for public and private sector clients. Ms. Redshaw has worked for years completing cultural 2012 heritage planning in a municipal setting. She has worked in municipal Bachelor of Arts building and planning departments andfor the private sectorto gain a Joint Advanced Major in Celtic diverse knowledge ofbuilding and planningin respect to how they applyto Studies and Anthropology cultural heritage.Rachel enjoys being involved in the local community and Saint Francis Xavier University has been involved in the collection of oral history, in English and Gaelic, and local records for their protection and conservation and occasionally lecturers 2014 on related topics. Her passion for history and experience in archives, Master of Arts museums, municipal buildingand planningdepartments supports her ability World Heritageand Cultural to provide exceptional cultural heritage services. Projects for Development The International Training Centre of the ILO in partnership with the PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS University of Turin, Politecnico di Intern Member, Canadian Association of Heritage Professionals (CAHP) Torino, University of Paris 1 Pantheon- Sorbonne, UNESCO, ICCROM, Macquarie University PROFESSIONAL HISTORY 2018 - PresentHeritage Planner, www.linkedin.com/in/rachelredshaw MacNaughton Hermsen Britton Clarkson Planning Limited 2018 Building Permit Coordinator, (Contract) Township of Wellesley 2018 Building Permit Coordinator (Contract) RSM Building Consultants 2017 Deputy Clerk, Township of North Dumfries CONTACT 2015-2016Building/ Planning Clerk 540 Bingemans Centre Township of North Dumfries Drive, Suite 200 Kitchener, ON N2B 3X9 T 519 576 3650 x751 F 519 576 0121 rredshaw@mhbcplan.com 1 www.mhbcplan.com 2 - 96 CURRICULUM VITAE Rachel Redshaw, MA, H.E. Dipl. 2009-2014Historical Researcher & Planner Township of North Dumfries 2012 Translator, Archives of Ontario 2012 Cultural Heritage Events Facilitator(Reminiscence Journey) and Executive Assistant, Waterloo Region Plowing Match and Rural Expo 2011 Curatorial Research Assistant Highland Village Museum/ Baile nan Gàidheal PROFESSIONAL/COMMUNITY ASSOCIATIONS 2019-2020Intern Member, Canadian Association of Heritage Professionals 2017-2020Member, AMCTO 2018-2019Member of Publications Committee, Waterloo Historical Society 2018 Member, Architectural Conservancy of Ontario- Cambridge 2018 - 2019Secretary, Toronto Gaelic Society 2012 -2017 Member(Former Co-Chair & Co-Founder), North Dumfries Historical Preservation Society 2011 - 2014Member, North Dumfries Municipal HeritageCommittee 2013Greenfield Heritage Village Sub-committee, Doors Open Waterloo Region 2012 Volunteer Historical Interpreter, Doon Heritage Village, Ken Seiling Waterloo Region Museum 2008-2012Member, Celtic Collections, Angus L. Macdonald Library 2012-2013Member(Public Relations), Mill Race Folk Society 2011 Member, University of Waterloo Sub-steering Committee for HCD Study, Village of Ayr, North Dumfries 2010-2011Member (volunteer archivist), Antigonish Heritage Museum AWARDS / PUBLICATIONS / RECOGNITION 2019Waterloo Historical Society Publication, Old Shaw: The Story of a Kindly Waterloo County Roamer CONTACT 2014Master’s Dissertation, The Rise of the City: Social Business 540 Bingemans Centre Incubation in the City of Hamilton Drive, 2014Lecture,A Scot’s Nirvana,Homer Watson House and Suite 200 Gallery Kitchener, ON N2B 3X9 T 519 576 3650 x751 F 519 576 0121 rredshaw@mhbcplan.com 2 www.mhbcplan.com 2 - 97 CURRICULUM VITAE Rachel Redshaw, MA, H.E. Dipl. 2013 Lecture, The Virtual Voice of the Past: The Use of Online Oral Accounts for a Holistic Understanding of History, University of Guelph Spring Colloquium 2012-2013Gaelic Events Facilitator, University of Guelph 2012-2015Intermediate Gaelic Facilitator, St. Michael’s College, University of Toronto Nach eil ann tuilleadh: An Nòs Ùr aig nan Gàidheal(BA 2012 Thesis) Thesis written in Scottish Gaelic evaluating disappearing Gaelic rites of passage in Nova Scotia. 2012Waterloo Historical Society Publication,Harvesting Bees and Feasting Tables: Fit for the Men, Women and Children of Dickie Settlement and Area, Township of North Dumfries 2007-201225 historical publications in theAyr News(access to some ) articles http://ayrnews.ca/recent PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSES 2020Condo Director Training Certificate (CAO) 2018Building Officials and the Law (OBOA Course) 2017-2018AMCTO Training (MAP 1) 2017AODA Training 2010Irish Archaeological Field School Certificate COMPUTER SKILLS ·Microsoft Word Office ·Bluebeam Revu 2017 ·ArcGIS ·Keystone (PRINSYS) ·Municipal Connect ·Adobe Photoshop ·Illustrator ·ABBYY Fine Reader 11 ·Book Drive CONTACT 540 Bingemans Centre Drive, Suite 200 Kitchener, ON N2B 3X9 T 519 576 3650 x751 F 519 576 0121 rredshaw@mhbcplan.com 3 www.mhbcplan.com 2 - 98 CURRICULUM VITAE Rachel Redshaw, MA, H.E. Dipl. SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE 2018-2020 CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS ·Peterborough Lift Lock and Trent-Severn Waterway (TSW), National Historic Sites, Development for 380 Armour Road, City of Peterborough ·City of Waterloo Former Post Office, Development for 35-41 King Street North, City of Waterloo, Phase II · Consumers’ Gas Station B, Development for450 Eastern Avenue, City of Toronto ·82 Weber Street East, City of Kitchener ·87 Scott Street, City of Kitchener ·2348 Sovereign Street, Town of Oakville (Phase I) ·Carriage House Restaurant, 2107-2119 Old Lakeshore Road, City of Burlington ·34 Manley Street, Village of Ayr, Township of North Dumfries ·Quinte’s Isle Campark, 558 Welbanks Road, Prince Edward County (LPAT) ·174 St. Paul Street, Town of Collingwood (LPAT) ·30-40 Margaret Avenue, City of Kitchener ·McDougall Cottage and Historic Site, Development for 93 Grand Avenue South, City of Kitchener ·60 Broadway, Town of Orangeville ·45 Duke Street, City of Kitchener ·383-385 Pearl Street, City of Burlington ·Old Kent Brewery, 197 Ann Street, City of London ·St. Patrick’sCatholic Elementary School, (SPCES), 20 East Avenue South, City of Hamilton ·2325 Sunningdale Road, City of London ·250 Allendale Road, City of Cambridge ·110 Deane Avenue, Town of Oakville ·249 Clarence Street, City of Vaughan · 2-16 Queen Street West, City of Cambridge (Hespeler) Specific for Relocation of Heritage Buildings ·1395 Main Street, City of Kitchener ·10379 & 10411 Kennedy Road, City of Markham CONTACT ·50-56 Weber Street West & 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener (temporary relocation of 107 Young St) 540 Bingemans Centre Drive, Suite 200 Kitchener, ON N2B 3X9 T 519 576 3650 x751 F 519 576 0121 rredshaw@mhbcplan.com 4 www.mhbcplan.com 2 - 99 CURRICULUM VITAE Rachel Redshaw, MA, H.E. Dipl. CULTURAL HERITAGE SCREENING REPORT ·Kelso Conservation Area, Halton County CULTURAL HERITAGE EVALUATION REPORTS ·52 King Street North, City of Kitchener ·Sarnia Collegiate Institute and Technical School (SCITS), 275 Wellington, City of Sarnia (Municipal contingency study) ·10536 McCowan Road, City of Markham ·Former Burns Presbyterian Church, 155 Main Street, Town of Erin (Designation Report) ·Former St. Paul’s Anglican Church, 23 Dover Street, Town of Otterville, Norwich Township (CRB) ·6170 Fallsview Boulevard, City of Niagara Falls CONSERVATION PLANS ·City of Waterloo Former Post Office, 35-41 King Street North, City of Waterloo ·82 Weber Street East, City of Kitchener ·87 Scott Street, City of Kitchener ·107 Young Street, City of Kitchener(Temporary relocation) ·1395 Main Street, City of Kitchener (Relocation) ·10379 & 10411 Kennedy Road, City of Markham (Relocation) Cultural Heritage Conservation Protection Plans (Temporary protection for heritage building during construction) ·12 & 54 Margaret Avenue, City of Kitchener ·45 Duke Street, City of Kitchener ·82 Weber Street West and 87 Scott Street, City of Kitchener DOCUMENTATION AND SALVAGE REPORTS ·57 Lakeport RoadCity ofSt. Catharines ·Gaslight District, 64 Grand Avenue South, City of Cambridge ·242-262 Queen Street South, City of Kitchener (Photographic Documentation Report) ·721 FranklinBoulevard, City of Cambridge HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATIONS CONTACT ·35-41 King Street North, City of Waterloo (Old Post Office), Phase II (alteration to building with a municipal heritage easement, Section 540 Bingemans Centre Drive, 37, OHA) Suite 200 Kitchener, ON N2B 3X9 T 519 576 3650 x751 F 519 576 0121 rredshaw@mhbcplan.com 5 www.mhbcplan.com 2 - 100 CURRICULUM VITAE Rachel Redshaw, MA, H.E. Dipl. ·50-56 Weber Street West & 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener (demolition and new construction within HCD) ·30-40 Margaret Avenue, City of Kitchener (new construction within HCD) ·249 Clarence Street, City of Vaughan (alteration within HCD) ·174 St. Paul Street, Town of Collingwood (demolition within HCD) MASTER PLANS/ HERITAGE CHARACTER STUDY ·Elgin, Central and Memorial Neighbourhoods, Municipality of Clarington CONTACT 540 Bingemans Centre Drive, Suite 200 Kitchener, ON N2B 3X9 T 519 576 3650 x751 F 519 576 0121 rredshaw@mhbcplan.com 6 www.mhbcplan.com 2 - 101 311.651!CJOHFNBOT!DFOUSF!ESJWF!LJUDIFOFS!0!POUBSJP!0O3C4Y:!0!U;62:/687/4761!0!G;!62:.687.1232!0!XXX/NICDQMBO/DPN 2 - 102 Heritage Impact Assessment Phase II 50-52 Weber Street West, 56 Weber Street West, and 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener, ON Appendix K-Curricula Vitae June 2021 MHBC | 69 2 - 103 WJUBF! ! Ebo!Dvssjf-!NB-!NDJQ-!SQQ-!DBIQ Ebo!Dvssjf-!b!Qbsuofs!boe!Nbobhjoh!Ejsfdups!pg!NICD“t!Dvmuvsbm!Ifsjubhf!Ejwjtjpo-! FEVDBUJPO kpjofe!NICD!Qmboojoh!jo!311:-!bgufs!ibwjoh!xpslfe!jo!wbsjpvt!qptjujpot!jo!uif! qvcmjd!tfdups!tjodf!2::8!jodmvejoh!uif!Ejsfdups!pg!Qpmjdz!Qmboojoh!gps!uif!Djuz!pg! 3117! Dbncsjehf!boe!Tfojps!Qpmjdz!Qmboofs!gps!uif!Djuz!pg!Xbufsmpp/!!!!! Nbtufst!pg!Bsut!)Qmboojoh*! ! Vojwfstjuz!pg!Xbufsmpp! Ebo!qspwjeft!b!wbsjfuz!pg!qmboojoh!tfswjdft!gps!qvcmjd!boe!qsjwbuf!tfdups!dmjfout! ! jodmvejoh!b!xjef!sbohf!pg!dvmuvsbm!ifsjubhf!qpmjdz!boe!qmboojoh!xpsl!jodmvejoh! 2::9! tusbufhjd!qmboojoh-!ifsjubhf!qpmjdz-!ifsjubhf!dpotfswbujpo!ejtusjdu!tuvejft!boe! Cbdifmps!pg!Fowjsponfoubm!Tuvejft! qmbot-!ifsjubhf!nbtufs!qmbot-!ifsjubhf!jnqbdu!bttfttnfout!boe!dvmuvsbm!ifsjubhf! Vojwfstjuz!pg!Xbufsmpp! mboetdbqf!tuvejft/!! ! ! 2::9! ! Cbdifmps!pg!Bsut!)Bsu!Ijtupsz*! QSPGFTTJPOBM!BTTPDJBUJPOT! Vojwfstjuz!pg!Tbtlbudifxbo! ! ! Gvmm!Nfncfs-!Dbobejbo!Jotujuvuf!pg!Qmboofst! Gvmm!Nfncfs-!Poubsjp!Qspgfttjpobm!Qmboofst!Jotujuvuf! Qspgfttjpobm!Nfncfs-!Dbobejbo!Bttpdjbujpo!pg!Ifsjubhf!Qspgfttjpobmt! TFMFDUFE!QSPKFDU!FYQFSJFODF! ! Ifsjubhf!Dpotfswbujpo!Ejtusjdu!Tuvejft!boe!Qmbot!! Bmupo!Ifsjubhf!Dpotfswbujpo!Ejtusjdu!Tuvez-!Dbmfepo!)voefsxbz*! Qpsu!Tubomfz!Ifsjubhf!Dpotfswbujpo!Ejtusjdu!Qmbo!)voefsxbz*! Qpsu!Dsfeju!Ifsjubhf!Dpotfswbujpo!Ejtusjdu!Qmbo-!!Njttjttbvhb! Upxo!pg!Dpcpvsh!Ifsjubhf!Dpotfswbujpo!Ejtusjdu!Qmbo!vqebuft! Spoefbv!Ifsjubhf!Dpotfswbujpo!Ejtusjdu!Tuvez!'!Qmbo-!Dibuibn!Lfou-! Cbssjfgjfme!Ifsjubhf!Dpotfswbujpo!Ejtusjdu!Qmbo!Vqebuf-!Ljohtupo! Wjdupsjb!Trvbsf!Ifsjubhf!Dpotfswbujpo!Ejtusjdu!Tuvez-!Nbslibn! Cbmb!Ifsjubhf!Dpotfswbujpo!Ejtusjdu!Tuvez!boe!Qmbo-!Upxotijq!pg!Nvtlplb!Mblft! Epxoupxo!Nfbgpse!Ifsjubhf!Dpotfswbujpo!Ejtusjdu!Tuvez!boe!Qmbo!! Cspplmzo!boe!Dpmmfhf!Ijmm!Ifsjubhf!Dpotfswbujpo!Ejtusjdu!Qmbo-!Hvfmqi! Hbsefo!Ejtusjdu!Ifsjubhf!Dpotfswbujpo!Ejtusjdu!Tuvez!boe!Qmbo-!Upspoup! ! Ifsjubhf!Nbtufs!Qmbot!boe!Nbobhfnfou!Qmbot! DPOUBDU! Djuz!pg!Hvfmqi!Dvmuvsbm!Ifsjubhf!Bdujpo!Qmbo!! ! Upxo!pg!Dpcpvsh!Ifsjubhf!Nbtufs!Qmbo! 651!Cjohfnbot!Dfousf!Esjwf-!! Cvsmjohupo!Ifjhiut!Ifsjubhf!Mboet!Nbobhfnfou!Qmbo!! Tvjuf!311! Djuz!pg!Mpoepo!Xftufso!Dpvoujft!Dvmuvsbm!Ifsjubhf!Qmbo!! Ljudifofs-!PO!O3C!4Y:! U!62:!687!4761!y!855! G!62:!687!1232! edvssjfAnicdqmbo/dpn! xxx/nicdqmbo/dpn! 2! 2 - 104 WJUBF! ! Ebo!Dvssjf-!NB-!NDJQ-!SQQ-!DBIQ ! Dvmuvsbm!Ifsjubhf!Fwbmvbujpot! NbdEpobme!Npxbuu!Ipvtf-!Vojwfstjuz!pg!Upspoup! Djuz!pg!Ljudifofs!Ifsjubhf!Qspqfsuz!Jowfoupsz!Vqebuf! Ojbhbsb!Qbslt!Dpnnjttjpo!Rvffo!Wjdupsjb!Qbsl!Dvmuvsbm!Ifsjubhf!Fwbmvbujpo!! Eftjhobujpo!pg!Nbjo!Tusffu!Qsftczufsjbo!Divsdi-!Upxo!pg!Fsjo! Eftjhobujpo!pg!Tu!Kpiot!Bohmjdbo!Divsdi-!Opsxjdi! Dvmuvsbm!Ifsjubhf!Mboetdbqf!fwbmvbujpo-!gpsnfs!Cvsmjohibn!Gbsntufbe-!Qsjodf! Fexbse!Dpvouz! ! Ifsjubhf!Jnqbdu!Bttfttnfout! Ifsjubhf!Jnqbdu!Bttfttnfou!gps!Qjfs!9-!Ibnjmupo! Ipnfs!Xbutpo!Ipvtf!Ifsjubhf!Jnqbdu!Bttfttnfou-!Ljudifofs! Fyqbotjpo!pg!Tdiofjefs!Ibvt!Obujpobm!Ijtupsjd!Tjuf-!Ljudifofs! Sfefwfmpqnfou!pg!gpsnfs!joevtusjbm!gbdjmjuz-!68!Mblfqpsu!Spbe-!Qpsu!Ebmipvtjf! Sfefwfmpqnfou!pg!gpsnfs!bnvtfnfou!qbsl-!Cpcmp!Jtmboe! Sfefwfmpqnfou!pg!ijtupsjd!Xbufsmpp!Qptu!Pggjdf! Sfefwfmpqnfou!pg!gpsnfs!Csjdl!Csfxfsz-!Xbufsmpp! Sfefwfmpqnfou!pg!gpsnfs!Bnfsjdbo!Tuboebse!gbdupsz-!Dbncsjehf! Sfefwfmpqnfou!pg!gpsnfs!Hpmejf!boe!NdDvmmpvhi!gbdupsz-!Dbncsjehf! Npvou!Qmfbtbou!Jtmbnjd!Dfousf-!Csbnqupo! Efnpmjujpo!pg!gpsnfs!gbsnipvtf!bu!21647!NdDpxbo!Spbe-!Nbslibn! ! Ifsjubhf!Bttfttnfout!gps!Jogsbtusvduvsf!Qspkfdut!boe!Fowjsponfoubm!Bttfttnfout! Ifsjubhf!Bttfttnfou!pg!21!Csjehft!xjuijo!Spdldmjggf!Tqfdjbm!Qpmjdz!Bsfb-!Upspoup! Cmfoifjn!Spbe!Sfbmjhonfou!Dpmmfdups!Spbe!FB-!Dbncsjehf! Cbemfz!Csjehf!FB-!Fmpsb! Cmbdl!Csjehf!Spbe!FB-!Dbncsjehf! Ifsjubhf!boe!Dvmuvsbm!Ifsjubhf!Mboetdbqf!Bttfttnfou!pg!Uxfouz!Njmf!Dsffl!Bsdi! Csjehf-!Upxo!pg!Mjodpmo! Ifsjubhf!Fwbmvbujpo!pg!Effs!Sjwfs-!Hjswfo-!Cvsou!Ebn!boe!NbdJoupti!Csjehft-! Qfufscpspvhi!Dpvouz! ! Dpotfswbujpo!Qmbot!! Cmbdl!Csjehf!Tusbufhjd!Dpotfswbujpo!Qmbo-!Dbncsjehf! Dpotfswbujpo!Qmbo!gps!Mph!ipvtf-!Cfvshfu{!Bwf-!Ljudifofs! DPOUBDU! Dpotfswbujpo!boe!Dpotusvdujpo!Qspufdujpo!Qmbo!.!65!Nbshbsfu!Bwfovf-!Ljudifofs! ! ! 651!Cjohfnbot!Dfousf!Esjwf-!! ! Tvjuf!311! ! Ljudifofs-!PO!O3C!4Y:! U!62:!687!4761!y!855! G!62:!687!1232! edvssjfAnicdqmbo/dpn! xxx/nicdqmbo/dpn! 3! 2 - 105 WJUBF! ! Ebo!Dvssjf-!NB-!NDJQ-!SQQ-!DBIQ Usjcvobm!Ifbsjoht;!Mpdbm!Qmboojoh!Bqqfbm!Usjcvobm!'!Dpotfswbujpo!Sfwjfx!Cpbse! Qpsu!Dsfeju!Ifsjubhf!Dpotfswbujpo!Ejtusjdu!)MQBU*! Efnpmjujpo!285!Tu!Qbvm!Tusffu!)Dpmmjohxppe!Ifsjubhf!Ejtusjdu*!)MQBU*! Cspplmzo!boe!Dpmmfhf!Ijmm!IDE!Qmbo!)MQBU*! Spoefbv!IDE!Qmbo!)MQBU*! Eftjhobujpo!pg!219!Nppsf!Tusffu-!Csbegpse!)DSC*! Sfefwfmpqnfou!pg!qspqfsuz!bu!75!Hsboe!Bwf-!Dbncsjehf!)MQBU*! Zpvohcmppe!tvcejwjtjpo-!Fmpsb!!)MQBU*! Eftjhobujpo!pg!Tu!Kpiot!Divsdi-!Opsxjdi!)DSC!.!voefsxbz*! Eftjhobujpo!pg!38!Qsjefbvy!Tusffu-!Ojbhbsb!po!uif!Mblf!)DSC!—!voefsxbz*! ! ! NBTUFS!QMBOT-!HSPXUI!NBOBHFNFOU!TUSBUFHJFT!BOE!QPMJDZ!TUVEJFT! ! Upxo!pg!Gspoufobd!Jtmboet!Nbsztwjmmf!Tfdpoebsz!Qmbo!! Ojbhbsb.po.uif.Mblf!Dpssjeps!Eftjho!Hvjefmjoft!! Dbncsjehf!Xftu!Nbtufs!Fowjsponfoubm!Tfswjdjoh!Qmbo!! Upxotijq!pg!Xftu!Mjodpmo!Tfuumfnfou!Bsfb!Fyqbotjpo!Bobmztjt!! Njojtusz!pg!Jogsbtusvduvsf!Sfwjfx!pg!Qfsgpsnbodf!Joejdbupst!gps!uif!Hspxui!Qmbo!! Upxotijq!pg!Ujoz!Sftjefoujbm!Mboe!Vtf!Tuvez!! Qpsu!Tfwfso!Tfuumfnfou!Bsfb!Cpvoebsz!Sfwjfx!! Djuz!pg!Dbncsjehf!Hsffo!Cvjmejoh!Qpmjdz!! Upxotijq!pg!Xftu!Mjodpmo!Joufotjgjdbujpo!Tuvez!'!Fnqmpznfou!Mboe!Tusbufhz!! Njojtusz!pg!uif!Fowjsponfou!Sfwjfx!pg!uif!E.Tfsjft!Mboe!Vtf!Hvjefmjoft!! Nfbepxmboet!Dpotfswbujpo!Bsfb!Nbobhfnfou!Qmbo!! Djuz!pg!Dbncsjehf!Usbjmt!Nbtufs!Qmbo!! Djuz!pg!Lbxbsuib!Mblft!Hspxui!Nbobhfnfou!Tusbufhz!! ! ! EFWFMPQNFOU!QMBOOJOH! ! Qspwjef!dpotvmujoh!tfswjdft!boe!qsfqbsf!qmboojoh!bqqmjdbujpot!gps!qsjwbuf!tfdups! dmjfout!gps;!! Esbgu!qmbot!pg!tvcejwjtjpo! Dpotfou! Pggjdjbm!Qmbo!Bnfoenfou! DPOUBDU! ! \[pojoh!Cz.mbx!Bnfoenfou! 651!Cjohfnbot!Dfousf!Esjwf-!! Njops!Wbsjbodf! Tvjuf!311! Tjuf!Qmbo! Ljudifofs-!PO!O3C!4Y:! U!62:!687!4761!y!855! G!62:!687!1232! edvssjfAnicdqmbo/dpn! xxx/nicdqmbo/dpn! 4! 2 - 106 CURRICULUM VITAE Rachel Redshaw, MA, H.E. Dipl. Rachel Redshaw, a Heritage Planerwith MHBC, joined the firm in 2018. Ms. EDUCATION Redshaw has a Bachelor of Arts in Anthropology and Celtic Studies and a Master of Arts in World Heritage and Cultural Projects for Development.Ms. 2011 Redshaw completed her Master’s inTurin, Italy; the Master’s program was Higher Education Diploma establishedbyUNESCO in conjunction with the University of Turin and the Cultural Development/ Gaelic International Training Centre of the ILO.Rachel is member of the Canadian Studies Association of Heritage Professionals. Sabhal Mòr Ostaig, University of the Highlands and Islands Ms.Redshaw provides a variety of heritage planning services for public and private sector clients. Ms. Redshaw has worked for years completing cultural 2012 heritage planning in a municipal setting. She has worked in municipal Bachelor of Arts building and planning departments andfor the private sectorto gain a Joint Advanced Major in Celtic diverse knowledge ofbuilding and planningin respect to how they applyto Studies and Anthropology cultural heritage.Rachel enjoys being involved in the local community and Saint Francis Xavier University has been involved in the collection of oral history, in English and Gaelic, and local records for their protection and conservation and occasionally lecturers 2014 on related topics. Her passion for history and experience in archives, Master of Arts museums, municipal buildingand planningdepartments supports her ability World Heritageand Cultural to provide exceptional cultural heritage services. Projects for Development The International Training Centre of the ILO in partnership with the PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS University of Turin, Politecnico di Intern Member, Canadian Association of Heritage Professionals (CAHP) Torino, University of Paris 1 Pantheon- Sorbonne, UNESCO, ICCROM, Macquarie University PROFESSIONAL HISTORY 2018 - PresentHeritage Planner, www.linkedin.com/in/rachelredshaw MacNaughton Hermsen Britton Clarkson Planning Limited 2018 Building Permit Coordinator, (Contract) Township of Wellesley 2018 Building Permit Coordinator (Contract) RSM Building Consultants 2017 Deputy Clerk, Township of North Dumfries CONTACT 2015-2016Building/ Planning Clerk 540 Bingemans Centre Township of North Dumfries Drive, Suite 200 Kitchener, ON N2B 3X9 T 519 576 3650 x751 F 519 576 0121 rredshaw@mhbcplan.com 1 www.mhbcplan.com 2 - 107 CURRICULUM VITAE Rachel Redshaw, MA, H.E. Dipl. 2009-2014Historical Researcher & Planner Township of North Dumfries 2012 Translator, Archives of Ontario 2012 Cultural Heritage Events Facilitator(Reminiscence Journey) and Executive Assistant, Waterloo Region Plowing Match and Rural Expo 2011 Curatorial Research Assistant Highland Village Museum/ Baile nan Gàidheal PROFESSIONAL/COMMUNITY ASSOCIATIONS 2019-2020Intern Member, Canadian Association of Heritage Professionals 2017-2020Member, AMCTO 2018-2019Member of Publications Committee, Waterloo Historical Society 2018 Member, Architectural Conservancy of Ontario- Cambridge 2018 - 2019Secretary, Toronto Gaelic Society 2012 -2017 Member(Former Co-Chair & Co-Founder), North Dumfries Historical Preservation Society 2011 - 2014Member, North Dumfries Municipal HeritageCommittee 2013Greenfield Heritage Village Sub-committee, Doors Open Waterloo Region 2012 Volunteer Historical Interpreter, Doon Heritage Village, Ken Seiling Waterloo Region Museum 2008-2012Member, Celtic Collections, Angus L. Macdonald Library 2012-2013Member(Public Relations), Mill Race Folk Society 2011 Member, University of Waterloo Sub-steering Committee for HCD Study, Village of Ayr, North Dumfries 2010-2011Member (volunteer archivist), Antigonish Heritage Museum AWARDS / PUBLICATIONS / RECOGNITION 2019Waterloo Historical Society Publication, Old Shaw: The Story of a Kindly Waterloo County Roamer CONTACT 2014Master’s Dissertation, The Rise of the City: Social Business 540 Bingemans Centre Incubation in the City of Hamilton Drive, 2014Lecture,A Scot’s Nirvana,Homer Watson House and Suite 200 Gallery Kitchener, ON N2B 3X9 T 519 576 3650 x751 F 519 576 0121 rredshaw@mhbcplan.com 2 www.mhbcplan.com 2 - 108 CURRICULUM VITAE Rachel Redshaw, MA, H.E. Dipl. 2013 Lecture, The Virtual Voice of the Past: The Use of Online Oral Accounts for a Holistic Understanding of History, University of Guelph Spring Colloquium 2012-2013Gaelic Events Facilitator, University of Guelph 2012-2015Intermediate Gaelic Facilitator, St. Michael’s College, University of Toronto Nach eil ann tuilleadh: An Nòs Ùr aig nan Gàidheal(BA 2012 Thesis) Thesis written in Scottish Gaelic evaluating disappearing Gaelic rites of passage in Nova Scotia. 2012Waterloo Historical Society Publication,Harvesting Bees and Feasting Tables: Fit for the Men, Women and Children of Dickie Settlement and Area, Township of North Dumfries 2007-201225 historical publications in theAyr News(access to some ) articles http://ayrnews.ca/recent PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSES 2020Condo Director Training Certificate (CAO) 2018Building Officials and the Law (OBOA Course) 2017-2018AMCTO Training (MAP 1) 2017AODA Training 2010Irish Archaeological Field School Certificate COMPUTER SKILLS ·Microsoft Word Office ·Bluebeam Revu 2017 ·ArcGIS ·Keystone (PRINSYS) ·Municipal Connect ·Adobe Photoshop ·Illustrator ·ABBYY Fine Reader 11 ·Book Drive CONTACT 540 Bingemans Centre Drive, Suite 200 Kitchener, ON N2B 3X9 T 519 576 3650 x751 F 519 576 0121 rredshaw@mhbcplan.com 3 www.mhbcplan.com 2 - 109 CURRICULUM VITAE Rachel Redshaw, MA, H.E. Dipl. SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE 2018-2020 CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS ·Peterborough Lift Lock and Trent-Severn Waterway (TSW), National Historic Sites, Development for 380 Armour Road, City of Peterborough ·City of Waterloo Former Post Office, Development for 35-41 King Street North, City of Waterloo, Phase II · Consumers’ Gas Station B, Development for450 Eastern Avenue, City of Toronto ·82 Weber Street East, City of Kitchener ·87 Scott Street, City of Kitchener ·2348 Sovereign Street, Town of Oakville (Phase I) ·Carriage House Restaurant, 2107-2119 Old Lakeshore Road, City of Burlington ·34 Manley Street, Village of Ayr, Township of North Dumfries ·Quinte’s Isle Campark, 558 Welbanks Road, Prince Edward County (LPAT) ·174 St. Paul Street, Town of Collingwood (LPAT) ·30-40 Margaret Avenue, City of Kitchener ·McDougall Cottage and Historic Site, Development for 93 Grand Avenue South, City of Kitchener ·60 Broadway, Town of Orangeville ·45 Duke Street, City of Kitchener ·383-385 Pearl Street, City of Burlington ·Old Kent Brewery, 197 Ann Street, City of London ·St. Patrick’sCatholic Elementary School, (SPCES), 20 East Avenue South, City of Hamilton ·2325 Sunningdale Road, City of London ·250 Allendale Road, City of Cambridge ·110 Deane Avenue, Town of Oakville ·249 Clarence Street, City of Vaughan · 2-16 Queen Street West, City of Cambridge (Hespeler) Specific for Relocation of Heritage Buildings ·1395 Main Street, City of Kitchener ·10379 & 10411 Kennedy Road, City of Markham CONTACT ·50-56 Weber Street West & 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener (temporary relocation of 107 Young St) 540 Bingemans Centre Drive, Suite 200 Kitchener, ON N2B 3X9 T 519 576 3650 x751 F 519 576 0121 rredshaw@mhbcplan.com 4 www.mhbcplan.com 2 - 110 CURRICULUM VITAE Rachel Redshaw, MA, H.E. Dipl. CULTURAL HERITAGE SCREENING REPORT ·Kelso Conservation Area, Halton County CULTURAL HERITAGE EVALUATION REPORTS ·52 King Street North, City of Kitchener ·Sarnia Collegiate Institute and Technical School (SCITS), 275 Wellington, City of Sarnia (Municipal contingency study) ·10536 McCowan Road, City of Markham ·Former Burns Presbyterian Church, 155 Main Street, Town of Erin (Designation Report) ·Former St. Paul’s Anglican Church, 23 Dover Street, Town of Otterville, Norwich Township (CRB) ·6170 Fallsview Boulevard, City of Niagara Falls CONSERVATION PLANS ·City of Waterloo Former Post Office, 35-41 King Street North, City of Waterloo ·82 Weber Street East, City of Kitchener ·87 Scott Street, City of Kitchener ·107 Young Street, City of Kitchener(Temporary relocation) ·1395 Main Street, City of Kitchener (Relocation) ·10379 & 10411 Kennedy Road, City of Markham (Relocation) Cultural Heritage Conservation Protection Plans (Temporary protection for heritage building during construction) ·12 & 54 Margaret Avenue, City of Kitchener ·45 Duke Street, City of Kitchener ·82 Weber Street West and 87 Scott Street, City of Kitchener DOCUMENTATION AND SALVAGE REPORTS ·57 Lakeport RoadCity ofSt. Catharines ·Gaslight District, 64 Grand Avenue South, City of Cambridge ·242-262 Queen Street South, City of Kitchener (Photographic Documentation Report) ·721 FranklinBoulevard, City of Cambridge HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATIONS CONTACT ·35-41 King Street North, City of Waterloo (Old Post Office), Phase II (alteration to building with a municipal heritage easement, Section 540 Bingemans Centre Drive, 37, OHA) Suite 200 Kitchener, ON N2B 3X9 T 519 576 3650 x751 F 519 576 0121 rredshaw@mhbcplan.com 5 www.mhbcplan.com 2 - 111 CURRICULUM VITAE Rachel Redshaw, MA, H.E. Dipl. ·50-56 Weber Street West & 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener (demolition and new construction within HCD) ·30-40 Margaret Avenue, City of Kitchener (new construction within HCD) ·249 Clarence Street, City of Vaughan (alteration within HCD) ·174 St. Paul Street, Town of Collingwood (demolition within HCD) MASTER PLANS/ HERITAGE CHARACTER STUDY ·Elgin, Central and Memorial Neighbourhoods, Municipality of Clarington CONTACT 540 Bingemans Centre Drive, Suite 200 Kitchener, ON N2B 3X9 T 519 576 3650 x751 F 519 576 0121 rredshaw@mhbcplan.com 6 www.mhbcplan.com 2 - 112 311.651!CJOHFNBOT!DFOUSF!ESJWF!LJUDIFOFS!0!POUBSJP!0O3C4Y:!0!U;62:/687/4761!0!G;!62:.687.1232!0!XXX/NICDQMBO/DPN 2 - 113 Date:Monday, July 19, 2021 To:Heritage Kitchener From:Michelle Drake, Heritage Planner cc:Victoria Grohn, Heritage Planner Subject:2021 Heritage Planning and Heritage Kitchener Work Plans The purpose of this memo is to assist Heritage Kitchener as they finalize their 2021 work plan. An overview of heritage planning staff’s 2021 work plan, a summary of Heritage Kitchener’s May work plan discussion, and some direction on next stepsare outlined below. Heritage Planning Work Plan Each year heritage planning staff prepare a work plan toidentify priorities, allocate resources, and manage expectations of the public and Council. Generally, work fits under three categories: Core Service (80%), Strategic Priorities (10%), and Other (10%). Each category contains several responsibilities including applications, programs, and projects. Core Service For the most part, our core services are requirements that are legislated by the Province(e.g. Ontario Heritage Act and Ontario Planning Act). Processing and providing comments on heritage and development applications requires a significant amount of heritage planning staff’s time.These applications are connected to Heritage Kitchener as the committee reviews and makes recommendations on select Heritage Permit Applications (HPAs) and provides comments on Heritage Impact Assessments (HIAs) for consideration by staff as part of the broader development process. 2021 brought an increase in HPA numbers and we are seeing a similar trend with development applications. Strategic Priorities Strategic priorities primarily consist of projects to develop policies, zoning, and guidelines, as well as to participate and review programs. In 2021, most projects are led by others in planning. The geographic boundaries of these projects include listed and designated (both individual designation and heritage conservation district (HCD) designation) properties that may require the submission of studies (e.g. HIA, CP) and/or applications (e.g. HPA). Given significant heritage interests, heritage planning staff are allocated to each of the projects. Strategic priorities are commonly presented at Heritage Kitchener for information and comments. Other Work that is not considered a core service or a strategic priority is lumped together under ‘other’ work. This includes heritage and planning inquiries by phone or email and in person. This also includes projects led by City staff outside of planning and Regional staff. Action: Heritage planning staff’s work plan is full, and thereforewe encourage HK to develop a work plan with projects that volunteer committee members can take the lead on and report back to staff and the committee. 3 - 1 Heritage Kitchener Work Plan Actions related to the Municipal Heritage Register (MHR), Heritage PermitApplications (HPAs), and Heritage Impact Assessments (HIAs) are required because they are legislated by the Province. They form a large part of Heritage Kitchener’s (HKs) work plan.To date, this is what the committee has been doing at most monthly meetings. Summary of Heritage Kitchener’s May Discussion Members passionately expressed interest in several projects at the May 2021 Heritage Kitchener meeting. Three themes were expressed: decolonizing our heritage; heritage and affordability; and, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusivity of the committee. These are big topics with broad scopes that reach well beyond the Heritage Kitchener committee. Members expressed comments beyond the traditional view of heritage and encouraged heritage planning staff and the Heritage Kitchenercommittee to broaden their perspectives on cultural heritage resources and heritage processes. The City acknowledges the importance of thinking beyond the traditional view of heritageand is still in the early stages of supporting equity, diversity,and inclusivity. In May 2021 Heritage Kitchener heard from Josh Joseph about the Reconciliation Action Plan Working Group. The City is actively building relationships with our Indigenous community members and groups. This ongoing work will be directed by The Mayor’s Task Force on Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion and implemented by the City’s first Equity, Anti-Racism, and Indigenous Initiatives team. As a corporation, the City is not yet in the position to embrace these broader perspectives adequately and meaningfully at a high-level, let alone relate them specifically to decolonizing our heritage. The City has a long journey ahead that involves many layers that will take time to properly explore. We believe opportunities to broaden the scope in future years to include actions related to decolonizing our heritage will be possible once the Equity, Anti-Racism, and Indigenous Initiatives team is fully established. We don’t want to lose sight of these important relationships with heritage but right now these actions are best deferred to a later Heritage Kitchenerwork plan. We hope that Heritage Kitchenerwill continue to think big and challenge the City to do better. Projects of Interest The list of projects identified by heritage planning staff and Heritage Kitchener include: develop a top 10 list of priorities to list and designate; review pre 2006 designating by-laws and assist in drafting revised statements of significance; research submission requirements for notices of intent to demolish; draft the Lower Doon neighbourhood sign at Willow Lake; draft a plaque for the birth place of Homer Watson; brainstorm how we can invite beyond the regular heritage advocates to participate in heritage matters; develop a virtual Jane’s Walk; promote heritage (e.g. online social media campaign); research best practices from other municipality’s related to decolonizing our heritage; and, research the effects of designation on affordability. Next Steps Heritage planning staff recommend that projects of interest to Heritage Kitchener be confirmed and that various sub-committees beformed to facilitate implementation of the work. Members are encouraged to continue the rd brainstorming session from May 2021 at the August 3Heritage Kitchener committee meeting.This discussion shouldinclude the identification of priority projects andtheestablishment ofsub-committees. Based on experience, heritage planning staff recommend the following: a maximum of three sub-committees; three or four people should form each sub-committee; the make up of the sub-committee should include both residents and Council members who sit on Heritage Kitchener with a maximum of one Council member per sub- committee; and, each sub-committee should select a maximum of one project. Action: Finalize Heritage Kitchener work plan by completing brainstorming session, identifying priority projects, and establishing sub-committees to work on each project. 3 - 2 ) HPAs 8 July 2021 2021 ( Approx. 25 HPAs approved or underway Approx. 4Approx. 10 + Program t Neighbourhood Planning Reviews and CHLs – law (CRoZBy) Stage 2b - perty Tax Refund Program s: Central Neighbourhoods (2021+) tion of regionally significant CHLs Review submission consultation applications (approx. 90 in 2020) - PreFormal applications (approx. 13 +) (approx. 10%) oo (approx. 80%) Process Heritage Permit Applications (30 in 2020)Perform all functions and duties required for all development applicationsReview Heritage Impact AssessmentsReview Conservation PlansReview and sign off building and demolition permit applicationsAdminister the Designated Heritage Property GranAdminister the Designated Heritage ProNeighbourhood PlanningCultural Heritage Landscape Implementation Phase 2Comprehensive Review of the Zoning ByDowntown zoningInclusionary zoningOntario Professional Planners Conference 2021 Station Area Planning (Block Line/Fairway/Sportsw orld) (2021+)Lower Doon Secondary PlanHidden Valley Secondary Plan Participate in the identificaParticipate in Permanent Indigenous Space and Heritage with Region and Area MunicipalitiesReview of Designated Heritage Property Grant program 2021 Heritage Planning Work Plan Core Service Strategic Priorities 3 - 3 Assessments (review documents, or participate on team) Inquiries (email, phone, voicemail)Victoria Park Master Plan (2021+)Guelph Street Storage Clean Up (asset management)10 year capital budget chartsReview and input into Stage II IONEnvironmental Regional Official Plan Review Parks Master Plan (2021+)Queen/King Heritage Marker (approx. 10%) Other 3 - 4 of 2 1 beyond the regular committee for promotion. - invite committee to develop a virtual walk for - Brainstorming May 4th HK Meeting Lower Doon neighbourhood/history sign at Willow Lake. Review heritage sign standards. Plaque at the birthplace of Homer Watson. How can we heritage advocates, not just a select few? SubJane's Walk. Online social media campaigns. Establish a sub committees. Review grant Identify indigenous cultural - committees to implement the committees. Develop a top 10 - - resources. laws and assist in drafting revised heritage resources. - law for heritage permit applications. - Attend awards ceremony. discussion. Identify concerns. Revise HIA Terms of Reference to provide ideas from May 4th HK meeting Draft Implementation Options approval by designating by Kitchener meeting and participate in the discussion. discussion. Identify concerns and content errors (not direction for research on indigenous cultural heritage Establish one or more sub grammar). notices of intention to demolish. Update the delegated statements of significance. program (staff). Establish submission requirements for list of priorities to list and to designate. Review pre 2006 Establish one or more sub Establish one or more sub Attend Heritage Kitchener meetings and participate in the Attend Heritage Kitchener meetings and participate in the Promote the awards program to your network. Encourage eligible properties to submit a nomination. Attend Heritage N/AN/A Yes Yes Maybe Budget Limitations Yes (Grants) (Designations) 1 1 1 1 2 3 Priority then HK K then staff HK then staffHK then staffH Staff then HKStaff Staff then HK Responsibility 2022 Work Plan - - 20222022 Wintergrant 2021 (review - OngoingOngoingOngoing program) Aug. 2021 Timelines Fall/Winter 2022 2021 law for - Actions vancy of Ontario; etc. DRAFT Heritage Kitchener 2021 Designate and list properties on the Municipal Heritage RegisterRecommend approval, approval with conditions, or refusal to Council on Heritage Permit Applications.Review and make comment on Heritage Impact Assessments and other studies regarding proposals that may impact cultural heritage resources.Implement Mike Wagner Heritage Awards Program.Provide input and comment on Heritage Best Practice measures including updating the designated heritage property grant program; establishing submission requirements for notices of intention to demolish listed heritage property; and, updating the delegated approval byheritage permit applications. Explore opportunities to participate / assist in promoting Kitchener based cultural heritage resources with other local heritage organizations such as Jane's Walk (tour of HCDs); Doors Open Waterloo Region; Waterloo Historical Society; Architectural Conser 3 - 5 of 2 2 territorial committee. - How do we engage the public? What does decolonization look like? what does decolonizing our heritage mean? What do we consider to be heritage? How do we decide what heritage is? How can immigrants feel valued? How do we change street names? Can we consider indigenous heritage as part of bridge, road, community projects, etc.? Make all people feel welcome and part of the discussion. Establish a decolonization subWhat could we be doing differently?Diversity of membership. Be more inclusive. Participate in land and acknowledgements at the beginning of HK meetings.How do we make meetings more accessible? committee to undertake research. What committee. Research best practices from - - sub other municipal heritage committees. are the effects of designation on affordability? Establish a Relationship between resident views and motivations for Establish a sub interest in requesting new Heritage Conservation Districts. N/AN/A 4 4 4 2020) Group.Equity, Working Working Inclusion. Action Plan Action Plan Diversity and HK then staff. Strategy (Dec Reconciliation Staff then HK. Reconciliation Task Force on Housing For All Group. Mayor's future Defer to Unknown work plan . Heritage Kitchener committee Terms of Conversation/framework around decolonizing our heritage processEffects of designation on affordabilityReview Reference 3 - 6 roof dormers replace windows dwelling to a duplex HPA Description Hog and Hen House new detached garage installation of skylights Suddaby Public School Installation of fascia sign Relocation of a maple tree Demolish a detached garage Demolish a detached garage Construct a detached garage Ground floor façade alterations Enlargement of rear addition and Construction of a carport addition Construction of a detached garage Masonry, soffit and roof repairs, and Construction of fence and stone wall Proposed alterations to the façade of Construct a one-storey addition to the with an enclosed addition and balcony Reconstruction of rear porch and balcony Installation of solar panels and metal roofWindow, roof and attic door replacement, replacement of a rear window with a door second storey rear addition and construct Construction of an addition and alterations southwest side of the existing building and Replace windows, replace roof, construct a Demolish a detached garage and consruct a Remove rear porch and balcony and replace Alteration and conversion of single detached wood repairs, and door installation on former Jun-21 29- 25-Jan-2125-Jan-2125-Jan-2122-Feb-2122-Mar-2115-Mar-2116-Mar-21 Delegated Approval Council Meeting Date / itage Kitchener Recommendation Carried UnanimouslyCarried UnanimouslyCarried UnanimouslyCarried UnanimouslyCarried UnanimouslyCarried UnanimouslyCarried UnanimouslyCarried UnanimouslyCarried UnanimouslyCarried Unanimously Carried Unanimously Her Initial comments & feedback 6-Apr-21 6-Apr-21 5-Jan-215-Jan-215-Jan-215-Jan-211-Jun-211-Jun-211-Jun-21 2-Mar-212-Mar-21 2-Feb-212-Mar-212-Mar-212-Mar-213-Aug-21 4-May-214-May-21 HK Meeting # DSD-21-001DSD-20-003DSD-21-036DSD-21-038DSD-21-039 DSD-21-002DSD-21-002DSD-21-018DSD-21-041DSD-21-037 DSD-2021-34DSD-2021-35DSD-2021-61DSD-2021-60DSD-2021-65DSD-2021-88DSD-2021-87 DSD-2021-145 Staff Report 2021 HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATIONS (HPA) Date Complete Legend: Unanimously approved by Heritage Kitchener permits an HPA to be approved through delegated authority. rederick St 17 Park St11 Park St 38 Shirk Pl 8 Devon St 23 Roland St 37 Heins Ave 11 Ellen St W 172 Queen St N172 Queen St N137 Queen St S 171 F 25 Margaret Ave 137-147 King St E 68 Saddlebrook Crt Property Address 59 Marianne Dorn Tr883 Doon Village Rd 59 Marianne Dorn Tr 34-36 Richmond Ave 1249 Doon Village Rd 300 Joseph Schoerg Cres300 Joseph Schoerg Cres Application Number PA-2021-IV-012 HPA-2021-IV-001HPA-2021-V-002HPA-2021-V-003HPA-2021-IV-004HPA-2021-V-005HPA-2021-IV-006HPA-2021-IV-007HPA-2021-IV-008HPA-2021-V-009HPA-2021-V-010HPA-2021-V-011HHPA-2021-V-013HPA-2021-V-014HPA-2021-IV -015HPA-2021-IV-016HPA-2021-V-017HPA-2021-IV-018HPA-2021-IV-019HPA-2021-V-020HPA-2021-V-021 123456789 # 1011121415161718192021222324252627282930313233 13 IF1 - 1