HomeMy WebLinkAboutHK - 2022-01-04 - Item 3.4. Full Draft Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA)-1001-1051 King St E & 530-564 Charles St ECultural Heritage
IMPACT
ASSESSMENT
Report
1001 -1051 King Street East, and 530-
564 Charles Street East,
City of Kitchener
Date:
November 2021
(updated December, 2021)
Prepared for:
Prepared by:
MacNaughton Hermsen Britton
Clarkson Planning Limited (MHBC)
200-540 Bingemans Centre Drive
Kitchener, ON N2B 3X9
T: 519 576 3650
F: 519 576 0121
1 ArmJi'u. t
1
�' _
OL -_
a,
AW
1
'l MHB.
PLANNING
M URBAN DESIGN
& LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECTURE
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East, City of Kitchener
Table of Contents
ProjectPersonnel..........................................................................................................................................3
PropertyOwner............................................................................................................................................ 3
Acknowledgements....................................................................................................................................... 3
Acknowledgement of Indigenous Communities...........................................................................................3
ExecutiveSummary.......................................................................................................................................4
1.0 Introduction............................................................................................................................................7
1.1 Description of the Subject Lands...................................................................................................7
1.2 Heritage Status..................................................................... .. ..................................................9
2.0 Policy Context................................................................... ................. ........................................12
2.1 The Planning Act and PPS 2020 ............................. ..................................................................12
2.2 The Ontario Heritage Act..........................................................................................................13
2.3 Region of Waterloo Official Plan ............... ...............................................................14
2.4 City of Kitchener Official Plan ...................... 16
3.0 Historical Overview ...................... ...... ......................................................................................20
3.1 City of Berlin (now Kitchen ........ ............................................................................... 20
3.2 1027 King Street East.. ........................................................................................................21
4.0 Description of Site and Context. .................................................................................................25
4.1 Waterloo County, Waterloo To ship.............................................................................................25
4.2 Historical Context.......:1w-- ......... * ........ * ...... * ........ * ...... * ........ * ...... * ........ * ...... * ........ * ...... * ......... 25
4.2 Landscape............................................................................................................................28
4.3 Description of Built Heritage Resources...........................................................................................28
4.3.1 Exterior.......................................................................................................................................29
4.3.2 Interior....................................................................................................................................... 32
5.0 Evaluation of Cultural Heritage Resources...........................................................................................40
5.1 Evaluation Criteria.............................................................................................................................40
5.2 1027 King Street East........................................................................................................................41
5.2.1 Evaluation of Design/Physical Value..........................................................................................41
5.2.2 Evaluation of Historical or Associative Value.............................................................................41
November2021 MHBC J i
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East, City of Kitchener
5.2.3 Evaluation of Contextual Value..................................................................................................42
5.2.4 Heritage Attributes....................................................................................................................42
5.6 Summary of Evaluation.....................................................................................................................43
6.0 Description of Proposed Development.................................................................................................45
6.1 Description of Proposed Development.............................................................................................45
7.0 Impacts of Proposed Development......................................................................................................48
7.1 Classifications of Impacts..................................................................................................................48
7.2 Impacts of the Proposed Development on 1027 King Street East....................................................48
7.2.1 Demolition of Section 'A'...........................................................................................................48
7.2.2 Demolition of Section 'B' (i & ii)............................................................................................49
7.2.3. Demolition of Section 'C'...............................................................................................49
7.2.4 Alteration of Identified View.................................................................................................49
7.3 Summary of Impact Analysis ................................... ....................... ....................................51
8.0 Consideration of Development Alternatives, Mitigation Measures and Conservation
Recommendations............................................... .............. 52
8.1 Alternative Development Appro
aches . ........'N........................................................52
8.1.1 Do nothing ..........................................................................................................52
8.1.2 Develop the site while retaildin...........................................................................52
8.1.3 Develop the site while retaof the buildings......................................................52
8.2 Mitigation Recommen)*,n
.............................................................................................54
9.0 Recommendations and C..................................................................................................... 55
10.0 Sources...............................................................................................................................56
AppendixA.................................................................................................................................58
Site Plan, Elevations, Views Analysis (next page)....................................................................................... 58
AppendixB..................................................................................................................................................59
Terms of Reference and Statement of Significance, City of Kitchener (next page)....................................59
AppendixC..................................................................................................................................................60
Structural Assessment (next page)............................................................................................................. 60
AppendixD..................................................................................................................................................61
Curriculum Vitae (next page)......................................................................................................................61
November2027 MHBC I ii
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
Project Personnel
Dan Currie, MA, MCIP, RPP, Managing Director of Cultural Project Manager, Senior
CAH P Heritage Review
Vanessa Hicks, MA Heritage Planner Research, Author, Field
Analyst
Property o\AinPr
Acknowlec
This report acknowl
Schmidt Room of Lc
It should be noted th
are intended for publ
Plans, but does not p.
er Public Library, Grace
nmercial purposes which
n review of Fire Insurance
Acknowledgement of Indigenous Communities
This HIA acknowledges that the subject lands are located on the traditional territory of the
Anishinabek (whoseland.ca) and is associated with the following treaties:
• Haldimand Treaty
The Haldimand Treaty of 1784 is related to the Haldimand Tract, which runs 6 miles on both
sides of the Grand River and was originally comprised of 950, 000 acres of land. The
settlement of these lands by Euro -Canadian settlers began in 1798 (Source: accessed online
in 2021 at sixnations.ca)
November2021 MHBC 13
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
Executive Summary
MHBC was retained by to undertake a Heritage Impact Assessment for the
proposed development of the subject lands located at 1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564
Charles Street East, City of Kitchener. The proposed development of the subject lands includes the
demolition of all buildings and structures to facilitate the construction of a mixed-use development
with a 30 storey residential tower and parking structure with rooftop amenity space.
The purpose of this Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) is to evaluate the proposed development in
terms of potential impacts to cultural heritage resources located on-site and adjacent. The property
located at 1027 King Street East is 'listed' (non -designated) on the City of Kitchener Register of
Properties of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest.
The subject lands includes a building which is known locashe former home of the Onward
Manufacturing Company which operated at this locatio m 1916 until approximately 1980. The
building has been altered over time and has lost or
Xne,r.ge fabric and as a result, its heritage
integrity has been compromised.
The building is comprised of three main e visiblefrom King Street. These
components are described in this report as dod 'C' (see below or Figure 16). The
central portion of the building (Section "B' udes elements indicative of the Art Deco
architectural style and was constructed subseque to sections "A" and "C". A structural analysis has
been completed for the building and has determined that Section "B" is not a stand-alone structure
and likely relies on Sections "A" and "C" for structural stability.
< ----* 8
November2021 MHBC 14
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
The Art Deco style tower (Section 'B ii) is the oly remaining component of the site which continues
to have design/physical value. The building also provides a terminus to the view from Onward
Avenue looking south to King Stre , e Onward Avenue neighbourhood has been identified by
the City as a potential Cultural Heritage La scap4
The demolition of the
dered a negligible adverse impact given that it has been
extensively altered and its integrity haNen compromised. In particular, Sections "A" and "C" in
have been altered to the extent that original fabric has been removed and no longer communicates
its original design features. Details regarding structural and condition issues with the building are
provided in Section 8.1 of this report as well as Appendix C.
The demolition of the Art Deco tower in the centre of the building (i.e. Section "B ii") is considered
an adverse heritage impact since it results in the removal of original heritage fabric.
The following mitigation measures are recommended:
• Submission of a Salvage and Documentation Report which includes:
o Photographic descriptions and photo maps of the property and the various sections
of the building; and
o Recommendations regarding salvage of any remaining original features;
• That consideration be given to retaining salvaged elements on-site for commemorative
purposes;
November2021 MHBC 15
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
• That consideration be given to the erection of a small bronze plaque which indicates that
the property was once occupied by the Onward Manufacturing Co.;
The proposed design of the new building includes a "tower feature" which is reminiscent of the
former Art Deco tower and incorporates new elements which communicate the history of the site,
such as the use of historic images and maps. This approach is appropriate and reinforces
appreciation for the history of the site.
This HIA has provided an analysis of views of the site from Onward Avenue and has determined
that no adverse impacts are anticipated. No mitigation recommendations are necessary related to
views.
November2021 MHBC 16
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
1 , O Introduction
MHBC was retained by to undertake a Heritage Impact Assessment for the
proposed development located at 1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East, City
of Kitchener. The purpose of this Heritage Impact Assessment is to evaluate the proposed
development in terms of potential impacts to cultural heritage resources located on-site and
adjacent.
This report has been prepared as input to the planning application and development proposal. The
background information and research has provided direction or redevelopment concept. This
report evaluates the proposal in the context of the City's policy framework and Provincial policy.
Description of the Subject Lands
The property located at 1027 King Street East is 'listed' (non-4esignated) on the City of Kitchener
Register of Properties of Cultural Herit"LValue car Interest:,"'
The subject lands include thep erties 16catedl% 1001, 1007, 1015, 1027, and 1051 King Street
East as well as the properties to at 530, 534,,-:642, and 564 Charles Street East. Together these
properties result in a roucn -shaped area, referred to in this report as the subject lands.
The subject lands ar Uatedsof Ring Street East,east of Borden Avenue South, north of
Charles Street East, anda Street South. The subject lands are located east of the Urban
Growth Centre (Downty and are zoned MU -3 (High Intensity Mixed Use Corridor).
November2021 MHBC 17
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
1
t rr- r
4 � f
VA, A
Figure 1: Satellite Photo of the broader context of the site. Approximate location of subject lands noted
with red dashing and 'listed' property identified with green das�rrg. (Source: Google Earth, 2021)
November2021 MHBC 18
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
ie k ,
` f 7,
Mlk
CD
CHq</ f4
f.'
22 _s -a
M 4f
Figure 2: Aerial photo of tke subject lands. Approximate boundary of subject lands noted with solid red
line. Location of'listeZs,
'erty a'*Nl027 King Street East identified with dotted green line. (Source:
Kitchener Interactive accessed 2021)
.2 Heritage Status
The property located at 1027 is 'listed' (non -designated) on the City of Kitchener Heritage Register
as per Section 27 of the Ontario Heritage Act. The subject lands are not located within a designated
Heritage Conservation District. The subject lands are not located adjacent to any properties which
are either 'listed' or designated under Part IV or Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act. The lands are
identified as being part of the Onward Avenue Neighbourhood (L-NBR-3), which is a potential
Cultural Heritage Landscape identified in the City of Kitchener Cultural Heritage Landscapes Study
(See Figure 4).
November2021 MHBC 19
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
The description of the Onward Avenue Neighbourhood identifies the property located at 1027 King
Street East (on the subject lands), but does not include information on the specific property. The
focus of the Onward Avenue Neighbourhood landscape is on street patterns and built elements of
the early residential neighbourhood. It is important to note that as a result of the City's
Neighbourhood Planning Review, this property is being proposed to Council for exclusion from the
Onward Neighbourhood CHL Boundary. Council approval for the final boundary is pending.
Heritage register f 70
gUOITORIUM
I
Intendto Designate /e
C A� EGS3RV f%
1 Listed Properties �
L
Part IVDesignation �
� SC � kl[CY?etw C Ixw,.i,
OfGndiNe $y
j Part (District) Designation sr C �rwrme,ti ck
�i Part IV and V Designation I-I+p
Heritage district J
m 0CiP td, nt r R r wy
5�
C.
-N ono 1w t
EAS
Chrrc;h
�0 ,
g1
MILL COURTLAND WOODSIDE PARK
17".x.
I / ' sad
Radtwrn Gardens
PQ �P y Faye Garden
S — f Ca
�4 TLTAST
'sq� - ROCKWAY — I
Figure 3: Map of subject lands (noted in red) identifying that the property located at 1027 King Street
East is 'listed'on the Heritage Register (Source: Kitchener Interactive Maps, 2018)
November2021 MHBC 110
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
I k $ .1U w1NN @ is
fops. at w ,'_.
• • 1�4
;•
I
46
ell. too
0 N
IL
Figure 4: Map of the Onward Avenue Neighbourhood noting ap oximate location of subject lands in
red (Source: Kitchener Cultural Heritage Landscapes Study, 2014)
November2021 MHBC 111
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
2,OPolicy Context
2.1 The Planning Act and PPS 2020
The Planning Act makes a number of provisions respecting cultural heritage either directly in
Section 2 of the Act or Section 3 respecting policy statements and provincial plans. In Section 2 The
Planning Act outlines 18 spheres of provincial interest which must be considered by appropriate
authorities in the planning process. One of the intentions of The ning Act is to "encourage the
co-operation and co-ordination among the various interest Regarding Cultural Heritage,
Subsection 2(d) of the Act provides that:
The Minister, the council of a municipality, a to#al board, a planning board and the
Municipal Board, in carrying out their responsibilities under this Act shall have regard
to, among other matters, matters of provincial interest such as...
(d) the conservation offeat�ofsi_ t410iitectural, cultural, historical,
archaeological or
In support of the provincial inteentifie in Subsection 2 (d) of the Planning Act, and as
provided for in Sectio vi has refined policy guidance for land use planning and
development matter the Provi 1 P cyStatement, 2020 (PPS). The PPS is "intended to be read
in its entirety and the vans po y areas are to be applied in each situation". This provides a
weighting and balancing ithin the planning process. When addressing cultural heritage
planning, the PPS provides fo e following:
2.6.1 Significant built heritage resources and significant cultural heritage landscapes
shall be conserved.
2.6.3 Planning authorities shall not permit development and site alteration on adjacent
lands to protected heritage property except where the proposed development and site
alteration has been evaluated and it has been demonstrated that the heritage
attributes of the protected heritage property will be conserved.
Significant: e) in regard to cultural heritage and archaeology, resources that have
been determined to have cultural heritage value or interest. Processes
and criteria for determining cultural heritage value or interest are
November2021 MHBC 112
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
established by the Province under the authority of the Ontario Heritage
Act.
Built heritage resource: means a building, structure, monument, installation or any
manufactured or constructed port or remnant that contributes to o property's cultural
heritage value or interest as identified by a community, including an Indigenous
community. Built heritage resources are located on property that may be designated
under Parts IV or V of the Ontario Heritage Act, or that may be included on local,
provincial, federal and/or international registers.
Cultural heritage landscape:: means a defined geographical area that may have been
modified by human activity and is identified as having cultural heritage value or interest
by a community, including an Indigenous community. The area may include features
such as buildings, structures, spaces, views, archaeological saes ornatural elements that
are valued together for their interrelationship, meaningassociation. Cultural heritage
landscapes maybe properties that have been determ I Oto have cultural heritage value
or interest under the Ontario Heritage Act, or been includen federal and/or
international registers, and/or protected thro offi Ian, zoning by-law, or other
land use planning mechanisms.
Conserved: means the identification, protection, manaw&ent and use of built heritage
resources, cultural heritage landscapes and archaeological resources in a manner that
ensures their cultural heritage value orinterest is retained under the Ontario Heritage Act.
This may be achieved he 'mplemention of recommendations set out in a
conservation plan, ae al assessment, and/or heritage impact assessment.
Mitigative mea an alt tive development approaches can be included in
these plans a sessment
The subject lands i nc I u cle%oo that is considered to be a non -designated property of cultural
heritage value or interest unde e consideration of the PPS, as the subject lands are recognized on
the Municipal Heritage Register as part of the City's 'listed' properties.
2.2 The Ontario Heritage Act
The Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O, 1990, c.0.18 remains the guiding legislation for the conservation of
significant cultural heritage resources in Ontario. This Heritage Impact Assessment has been guided
by the criteria provided with Regulation 9/06 of the Ontario HeritageAct outlines the mechanism for
determining cultural heritage value or interest. The regulation sets forth categories of criteria and
several sub -criteria.
November2021 MHBC 113
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
2.3 Region of Waterloo Official Plan
Chapter 3, Section 3.G of the Regional Official Plan provides policies regarding the conservation of
cultural heritage resources which are related to the scope of this Heritage Impact Assessment as
follows:
3.G Cultural Heritage
Cultural heritage resources are the inheritance of natural and cultural assets that give
people a sense of place, community and personal identity. Continuity with the past
promotes creativity and cultural diversity. The region has a rich and diverse heritage,
including distinctive cultures, traditions, festivals, artisans and aftspeople, landmarks,
landscapes, properties, structures, burial sites, cemet natural features and
archaeological resources. These resources provide an i \�rf
s of defining and
confirming a regional identity, enhancing the lity othe community,
supporting social development and promoti cono is y. The Region is
committed to the conservation of its culturalXArenicipalities,
responsibility is shared with
the Federal and Provincial governments, other government
agencies, the private sector, property oners aunity.
Cultural Heritage Impact Asses t
3.G.73 Area Municipaliti ill es fish policies in their official plans to require the
submission of a Cultura Heritage Impact Assessment in support of a proposed
developmentZce
''cludes or is adjacent to a designated property, or includes a non-
designated reofcultural heritage value or interest listed on the Municipal Heritage
Register.
3.G.14 Where a Cultural HeMtage Impact Assessment required under Policy 3.G. 73 relates
to a cultural heritage resource of Regional interest theArea Municipality will ensure that
a copy of the assessment is circulated to the Region for review. In this situation, the
Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment submitted by the owner/applicant will be
completed to the satisfaction of both the Region and the Area Municipality.
3.G.15 Where a development application includes, or is adjacent to, a cultural heritage
resource of Regional interest which is not listed on a Municipal Heritage Register, the
owner/applicant will be required to submit a Cultural Heritage ImpactAssessment to the
satisfaction of the Region.
3.G.76 The Region will undertake a Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment and consult
with the affected Area Municipality and the Regional Heritage Planning Advisory
November2021 MHBC 114
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
Committee prior to planning, designing or altering Regional buildings or infrastructure
that mayaffecta cultural heritage resource listed on the region -wide inventory described
in Policy 3.G.4. The Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment will be reviewed and approved
in accordance with the policies in this Plan.
3.G.77 Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment will include, but not be limited to the
following:
(a) historical research, site analysis and evaluation;
(b) identification of the significance and heritage attributes of the cultural heritage
resource;
(c) description of the proposed development or site alteration;
(d) assessment of development orsite alteration impacts;
(e) consideration of alternatives, mitigation and conservati ethods;
(f) schedule and reporting structure for implementation nitoring; and
(g) a summary statement and conservation recomnW a<tion.
3.G.18 Where a Cultural Heritage Impact Asssment required in this Plan relates to a
cultural heritage resource of Regional interest, the conservation recommendations will,
wherever feasible, aim to conserve cultural heritage rerces intact by:
(a) recognizing and incorporating heritage resources their surrounding context into
JP
the proposed development i anner that does not compromise or destroy the
heritage resource;
(b) protecting andde�`
tabil' buil urces that maybe underutilized, derelict
or vacant; and (c) ngopment to be physically and visually compatible with,
and
3. G.
Itural heritage resource intact in
accordance with Policy 3.G. 78, the conservation recommendations will:
(a) promote the reuse or adaptive reuse of the resource, building, or building elements to
preserve the resource and the handiwork of past artisans; and
(b) require the owner/applicant to provide measured drawings, a land use history,
photographs and other available documentation of the cultural heritage resource in its
surrounding context.
3.G.20 Cultural Heritage Impact Assessments may be scoped or waived by the Region or
the Area Municipality as applicable.
November2021 MHBC 115
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
2.A City of Kitchener Official Plan
Section 12 of the Kitchener Official Plan (2014) provides the following policies regarding the
conservation of cultural heritage resources as it relates to the scope of this Heritage Impact
Assessment as follows:
Objectives
12.1.1. To conserve the city's cultural heritage resources through their identification,
protection, use and/or management in such a way that their heritage values, attributes
and integrity are retained.
12.1.2. To ensure that all development or redevelopment a'q,d site alteration is sensitive
to and respects cultural heritage resources and that cultural heritage resources are
conserved.
12.1.3. To increase public awareness and aprciation for cultura eritage resources
through educational, promotional and incentive programs.
12.1.4. To lead the community by exa .h4ication, protection, use and/or
management of cultural heritage resou oor leased by the City.
Policies
12.C.1.1. The City will ensbre that cultural �feritage resources are conserved using the
provisions of the erageAct, the Planning Act the Environmental Assessment
Act, the Cemet s Act an%e M'cipal Act.
12.C.1.2. The City Vstabliand consult with a Municipal Heritage Committee (MHC)on matters relating heritage resources in accordance with provisions of the
Ontario Heritage Act.
12.C.1.3. The City will develop, prioritize and maintain a list of cultural heritage resources
which will include the following:
a) properties listed as non -designated properties of cultural heritage value or
interest on the Municipal Heritage Register,
b) properties designated under Part IV and V of the Ontario Heritage Act;
c) cultural heritage landscapes; and,
d) heritage corridors.
November2021 MHBC 116
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
12.C.1.4. The City acknowledges that not oll of the city's cultural heritage resources hove
been identified as a cultural heritage resource as in Policy 72.C.7.3. Accordingly, a
property does not have to be listed or designated to be considered as having cultural
heritage value or interest.
72.C.1.5. Through the processing of applications submitted under the Planning Act,
resources of potential cultural heritage value or interest will be identified, evaluated and
considered for listing as a non -designated property of cultural heritage value or interest
on the Municipal Heritage Register and/or designation under the Ontario Heritage Act.
Heritage Impact Assessments and Heritage Conservation Plans
72, C. 7.23. The City will require the submission of Heritage 1
Heritage Conservation Plan fordevelopment, redevelopme
the potential to impact a cultural heritage resource an
a) on or adjacent to a protected heritage prop
b) on or adjacent to a heritage corridor in
73.C.4.18 inclusive; AN. -
c) on properties listed as non -
on the Municipal Heritage Rei
d) on properties listed on I
e) on or adjacent t ti
72. C. 1.24. Wh Heritage
a cultural herita source
assessment is circul
Assessment and/or a
d site alteration that has
with Policies 73.C.4.6 through
heritage value or interest
Inventory of Historic Buildings; and/or,
I heritage landscape.
)act7ssessmentrequired under Policy 72. C. 7.23 relates to
Regional interest, the City will ensure that a copy of the
Region for review prior to final consideration by the City.
72, C.1.25. A Heritage ImpactAssessment and Heritage Conservation Plan required by the
City must be prepared by a qualified person in accordance with the minimum
requirements as outlined in the City of Kitchener's Terms of Reference for Heritage Impact
Assessments and Heritage Conservation Plans.
72, C. 7.26. The contents of a Heritage Impact Assessment will be outlined in a Terms of
Reference. In general, the contents of Heritage Impact Assessment will include, but not
be limited to, the following:
a) historical research, site analysis and evaluation;
November2021 MHBC 117
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
b) identification of the significance and heritage attributes of the cultural heritage
resource;
c) description of the proposed development or site alteration;
d) assessment of development or site alteration impact or potential adverse impacts;
e) consideration of alternatives, mitigation and conservation methods;
f) implementation and monitoring; and,
g) summary statement and conservation recommendations.
72.C.1.27. Any conclusions and recommendations of the Heritage Impact Assessment
and Heritage Conservation Plan approved by the City will be incorporated as mitigative
and/or conservation measures into the plans for devement or redevelopment and
into the requirements and conditions of approval y application submitted under
the Planning Act.
j
72. C. 7.28. Heritage ImpactAssessments and Heritage Conservation Plans required by the
City maybe scoped or waived by the City, as deemed ropriate.
Demolition/Damage of Cultural HeritVe s
72. C. 7.32. Where a cultu<t�,agsour proposed to be demolished, the City may
require all or any part of 1 heritage resource to be given to the City
qw
for re -use, archival, disnlmemorative purposes, at no cost to the City.
72, C. 1.33. Int vent tha mdWn, salvage, dismantling, relocation or irrevocable
damage to a ficant c ral heritage resource is proposed and permitted, the
owner/applicant be quired to prepare and submit a thorough archival
documentation, to th tisfaction of the City, prior to the issuance of an approval
and/or permit.
72.C.1.34. Where archival documentation is required to support the demolition, salvage,
dismantling, relocation or irrevocable damage to a significant cultural heritage
resource, such documentation must be prepared by a qualified person and must include
the following:
a) architectural measured drawings; b) a land use history,, and,
c) photographs, maps and other available material about the cultural heritage resource
in itssurrounding context. Archival documentation maybescoped or waived by the City,
as deemed appropriate.
November2021 MHBC 118
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
12.C.1.35. In the event that demolition is proposed to a non -designated property of
cultural heritage value or interest listed on the Municipal Heritage Register, the
owner/applicant will be required to provide written notice to the City of the intent to
demolish, 60 days prior to the date demolition is proposed. The significance of the
cultural heritage resource will be evaluated and Council may use the 60 days to pursue
designation of the cultural heritage resource under the Ontario Heritage Act.
12, C. 1.36. The City may give due consideration to designate under the Ontario Heritage
Act any cultural heritage resource if that resource is threatened with demolition,
significant alterations or other potentially adverse impacts.
Design/Integration
12, C. 1.46. The City will prepare guidelines as part of the Urb esign Manual to address
the conservation of cultural heritage resources in \ando recognize the
importance of the context in which the cultural her' e resoulocated.
12.C.1.47. The City may require architectural #esign guic*lines to guide development,
redevelopment and site alteration on, adjacent to, o;'Fi`n close proximity to properties
designated under the Ontario Heritag r other cultural heritage resources.
November2021 MHBC 119
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
3. O Historical Overview
3.1 City of Berlin (now Kitchener)
The subject property is located in the former City of Berlin (now Kitchener), which was settled in
1807 by Joseph Schneider, who constructed a log cabin on Lot 17 on the east side of Queen Street.
Other early settlers included Benjamin Eby, Samuel Eby, and John Brubacher. The hamlet of Berlin
was incorporated in 1833. At this time, Berlin had a population of 0 people. By 1912, Berlin was
proclaimed a City, having a population of 15,195 people.
An influx of German workers came to the city in the first%of of the century (Uttley, 1937). The
construction of the Grand Trunk Railway in 1856 inc re' settlem and industrialization of
the area. By the early 20t" century, Berlin's urban tort waj
nated by a variety of factories.
Berlin experienced anti -German sentimentsIlowing World War I, and as a result the City of Berlin
changed its name to the City of Kitchener aft 'Lord Kitchener in 1916 following a petition of over
200 businessmen (Uttley, 1937).
Af L, r�
Figure 5: Tremaine Map of Waterloo Township,1861. Approximate location of subject property denoted
by arrow.
November2021 MHBC 120
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East, City of Kitchener
ir
.F.. mow.
C.
Figure 6: 1877 Illustrated Historical Atlas of Waterloo & Wellington Counties. Approximate location of
subject property denoted by arrow.
3.2 1027 King Street East
The subject lands are legally described as Part Lots 16, 17, and 18 Plan 262, City of Kitchener.
According to records available from the City of Kitchener Land Registry Office, Theodore A. Witzel
purchased Lot 16 of Plan 262 in 1916, Lot 17 in 1916, and Lot 18 in 1919.
November2021 MHBC 121
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
Figure 7: Historic photograph of the building located at 102714 gust, early 201h century (Source:
Onward Manufacturing Company, n.d.)
According to the Waterloo Generations website odore Adam 'Ted' Witzel was born in 1875 and
initiated a manufacturing comp in 1906 in B n (now Kitchener) making ball-point pens. His
company became the Onwar nu acturing mpany by 1908 and expanded the range of
manufactured products tode ware and home appliances (such as steam cookers, sliding
furniture shoes, and
According to the his of the ward Manufacturing Company (available on the Onward
Manufacturing Company si the company became the first in Canada to manufacture the
Onward and Triumph bran cuums. T.A. Witzel obtained exclusive rights to sell the Eureka
Vacuum cleaner in 1909 and retail stores were developed across Canada.
During the Second World War, the company shifted production from housewares to manufacture
arms and ammunition. After the war, the company expanded again to include barbeques and
developed brands such as Broil King and Stirling (Waterloo Generations).
According to the 1911 census, Theodore Witzel is listed as a manufacturer of German descent (born
in the U.S.A.), residing with his wife Carrie and daughter Hellen at 53 Roy Street (See Figure 8).
November2021 MHBC 122
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
According to Vernon's 1910-1911 Directory for the City of Kitchener, the Onward Mfg. Co is listed
at 143 King Street West (south side) between Gaukel Street and Water Street South (Berlin). This is
likely the first building of the Onward Manuf. Co.
According to the 1916 Directory for the City of Kitchener, Theodore Witzel is listed as the Manager
of the Onward Mfg. Co, and resides at 53 Roy Street, Berlin. At ime, the Onward Manuf. Co. is
located at 399 King Street East, which was re -addressed to lQdPRIjkStreet in 1930 (See Figure 10).
Figure 9: Excerpt of Cairnes' 1
Library)
The company remai
r A. c
h. 121
of Kitchener (Source: City of Kitchener Public
Street East until at least 1980 (See Figure 12).
November2021 MHBC 123
k2
4
y...
a J
{
1w 7
173`i.;-�
Figure 8: Excerpt of 1911
census, Berlin
(Source: Ancestry.ca)
According to Vernon's 1910-1911 Directory for the City of Kitchener, the Onward Mfg. Co is listed
at 143 King Street West (south side) between Gaukel Street and Water Street South (Berlin). This is
likely the first building of the Onward Manuf. Co.
According to the 1916 Directory for the City of Kitchener, Theodore Witzel is listed as the Manager
of the Onward Mfg. Co, and resides at 53 Roy Street, Berlin. At ime, the Onward Manuf. Co. is
located at 399 King Street East, which was re -addressed to lQdPRIjkStreet in 1930 (See Figure 10).
Figure 9: Excerpt of Cairnes' 1
Library)
The company remai
r A. c
h. 121
of Kitchener (Source: City of Kitchener Public
Street East until at least 1980 (See Figure 12).
November2021 MHBC 123
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
tiw�t \„rc►na 36a� Rut •
lr►"�1 �e�rtr�ta's T?�'iin;�
� \ n r t mal , iillN4
t��l�snre� N�
vOn,J.fi7
>lyrst �, Ew,i
ut h twgin s *�
rnnlna, act- M 0 •
rF , h
Figure 10: Excerpt of 1930 Directory of the City of Kitchener (Sou of Kitchener Public Library)
or
IL
02"7 }n war
.Ltd
I er L t c1 38
108 ce V 36
1 ,Jahn E, thick 36 t�
+erp
egins 36 ,
wmmn, 8, MTA • 3
rr morin
Figure 11: Excerpt of the 1941 Directory of the City of Kitchener (Source: City of Kitchener Public Library)
Od
" 1001 V"n1
1001 AlAn 1AMR (:rte 544%
1003 S101400
+K)1'iarr*Pv 0
Tdh 21 r 1
ifl�`ybarldW %ra,Cate
57&7140
I I],� � �I raVr$11�1 AAa1"IhJlflGkLtl I RIS
e MICA
Figure 12: Excerpt of 1980 Directory of the City of Kitchener (Source: City of Kitchener Public Library)
November2021 MHBC 124
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
4. O Description of Site and Context
4. ] Waterloo County, Waterloo Township
The subject property is located on lands where pioneer settlement commenced in the late
eighteenth century. In 1784, the Haldimand Tract was granted to Six Nations by the British in
recognition of their support during the American Revolution (Bloomfield 19, 2006). Over time the
lands were subdivided, and in 1798 Block 2 (which became Waterl Township) was registered and
a Crown Grant was drawn for Colonel Richard Beasley, a Loyali t from New York who had arrived in
Canada in 1777 (McLaughlin 2007). The land was then s�yed and further subdivided. At this
time, German Mennonite farmers from Pennsylvania
them went back to Pennsylvania and returned wit
settle the land (Hayes 5, 1997).
4 , 2 H istorica I Context
The building located on the
website as being constr
1925 and 1947 (as per vies
According to the 1908
ing farmland in the area. Several of
lies the 07Mowing year to buy and
1Zl6"ted on the Onward Manufacturing Company
ith additions added to the east at some point between
Insurance Plan, the first portion of the existing building to be
constructed was the north7%Fion, described in this report (see Figure 16). The fire insurance
plan describes the building as eing a 3 storey building of brick construction. The building is noted
as a 'Vacuum Cleaner Factory' owned by the 'Onward Mfg. Co.' which includes electrical power,
heated by steam and fueled by coal. The Fire Insurance Plan notes that a small single storey wood
frame 'auto'building or shed is located east of the building, which has since been demolished. The
building is addressed as 1027 King Street Fast. At this time, 5 small single -detached residential
buildings are located to the west. No buildings or structures are located to the east towards Ottawa
Street South.
The 1908 rev. 1947 Fire Insurance Plan notes that the northerly portion of the building (referred to
in this report as Section 'A') remains, and that a larger building has been added to the east. The
records available at the City of Kitchener Public Library are only available in black and white and the
details of this map are difficult to decipher. Sections 'Band 'C' of the building appear to both have
November2021 MHBC 125
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
been constructed by this date (at some point between 1925 and 1947). The Fire Insurance Plan
notes that the facility is known as the 'Onward Mfg. Co., Eureka Vacuum Cleaner Co. Ltd'. Several
additional buildings have been added north of the building, including single -detached residences,
a soda water company, and a brass and aluminum foundry. Dwellings and small businesses have
been added east of the subject lands towards Ottawa Street.
According to a review of aerial photographs of the subject lands dated 1945, 1955, and 1965, the
subject lands appear to have changed little during these eras. By 1945 the area was built-up with
commercial, retail, and residential buildings. The tree -lined boulevard is easily distinguished to the
north, along Onward Avenue. The building located at 1027 King Street East becomes more easily
distinguished in the 1955 and 1965 aerial photos (See Figures 15 —17).
Figure 13: 1945 Aerial Photograph noting approximate location of the building located at 1027 King
Street East. (Source: University of Waterloo Map Library, 2018)
November2021 MHBC 126
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
I
P
r
Figure 14: 1955 Aerial Photograph noting approximate location of the building located at 1027 King
Street East. (Source: University of Waterloo Map Library, 2018) �*
Figure 15: 1965 Aerial Photograph noting approximate location of the building located at 1027 King
Street East. (Source: University of Waterloo Map Library, 2018).
November2021 MHBC 127
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
4.2 Landscape
The subject lands are comprised of structures related to commercial, retail, residential uses. This
includes businesses related to the automobile industry along King Street East. One residential
building is located to the south, fronting Charles Street East at 534 Charles Street East. A residential
building was previously located at 542 Charles Street East, but was demolished at some point
between 2016 and 2017.
The building located at 1027 King Street East is set -back approximately 24 metres from the property
line at King Street East. The eastern portion of the building extends all the way to the property line
at Charles Street East. The western half of the building is set-backpproxi mately 10 metres from
the rear property line. A parking lot is located at the front of the Wt adjacent to King Street East. No
natural features or plantings are located on the property at 1 27 King Street East. The rear yards of
534 Charles Street East appears to have formerly includeda�en landscaped space associated with
the residential dwelling.
4.3 Description of Built Heritage Res `
The building located at 1027 King Street East is comprised of six different parts referred to in this
report as Sections'A','B (i), 'B (ii)'C','D', and 'E. IL
Section
A
B (i)
B (ii)
C
3
3 storeyl
Art Deco
Approx. Date of Construction
Ping Between 1914-1916
style in -fill Between 1925 and 1947
Between 1925 and 1947
Single storey addition Between 1925 and 1947
Single Storey loading bay 2nd half 20th Century
E Outbuilding/Garage 2nd half 20th Century
November2021 MHBC 128
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
Figure 16: Aerial photo of
Kitchener Interactive Mad
4.3.1 Exterior
North Elevation
ds noting different sections of 1027 King Street East (Source:
The north elevation includes the front faQade of Sections 'A', 'B', and 'Cof the building. Section 'A'
(to the west) includes a main floor (slightly below grade), as well as a second and third storey above.
The north elevation displays three bays of vertical windows which have been altered from their
original appearance to include contemporary windows with dark tinted spandrel glass.
The north elevation of Section 'B' is an Art Deco style tower that was the original main entrance and
includes a staircase that provides access to the upper floors. This portion of the building has been
altered, but retains most of its original features including the staircase and windows. The north
elevation of Section 'C' (to the east) has been altered. This building formerly displayed a brickfacade
with two sets of 8 rectangular -shaped windows across the front of the building.
November2021 MHBC 129
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
f,'�'_
Figures 17 & 18: (left) View of north elevation looking south-west from south side of King Street East,
(right) View of north elevation looking south from north side of King Street East (Source: MHBC, 2018)
a
logof
.� � r .r
.I
_W= 006 MENLM-
Figures 19 & 20: (left) Detail view1f north eleva Section 'C') looking south-west from south side of
King Street East, (right) Detail view of no�evation (Section 'B') looking south from south side of King
Street East (Source: MH C, 2018)
M, __
AN
Figure 21: (left) Detail view of north elevation (Section 'A') looking south-west from south side of King
Street East (Source: MHBC, 2018)
November2021 MHBC 130
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
East Elevation
The east elevation has been significantly altered, where all original industrial -style building
windows have been stuccoed or parged over.
Figures 22 & 23: (left) View of east elevation looking south- t from la ay (right) View of east
elevation looking north-west from north side of Charles S East (Source: C, 2018)
South Elevation
The
The south elevation provides views of the rSar facades of tions 'B', 'C', 'D', and 'E'. The rear of
Section 'A' has a small cinder block addition (constructed 4 some point in the second half of the
20th century) and includestwo large foadin -ba . ection 'B' (single storey brick structure) includes
a flat roof and one boarded -up vvow 00 ning.ction 'Chas a very shallow pitched gabled roof
wo
(which appears almost flat) and displays tsm boarded -up window openings just below the
roof, with four large boar ,ed -up rectangular -shaped window openings below. While Section 'D'
displays cinder block structs thr of Sections 'B' and 'C' appear to include painted red
brick. The existing single storey gara e/outbuilding constructed of cinder blocks and displays a flat
roof and garage door at the south blevation. This structure as well as Section 'D' are 20th century
additions to the site and are not, of cultural heritage value or interest.
Figures 24 & 25: (left) View of south elevation looking north from south side of Charles Street East
(right) View of south elevation looking north from south side of Charles Street East (Source: MHBC, 2018)
November2021 MHBC 131
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
West Elevation
The west elevation is primarily the side facade of Section 'A'. The building originally displayed 5 bays
of very large windows spanning the second and third storeys. These windows have been partially
bricked -over and portions of the windows now include contemporary block -style glass.
Figures 26 & 27: (left) View of west elevation looking
looking south-east (Source: MHBC, 2018)
4.3.2 Interior
The following provides a description of the int or of Sections 'A', 'B' and 'C'. Only Section 'A'
includes a basement. It is important to note t tfloors of Sections 'A','B' and 'C' do not match -
up. Section 'C' appears to have originally been 'ccessed by Section 'B'. Section 'B' of the building
(ground floor portionr north -south towards Charles Street) appears to be part of Section 'C'.
Section 'A'— Baseme
The basement of Section 'A' is currently used as a staff room and storage. The basement includes
remnants of original heating/cooling components such as the boiler and coal oven. A ramp is
provided in the basement of Section 'A' providing access to Section 'C' (See Figure 34).
November2021 MHBC 132
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
Figures 28 & 29: (left) View of entrance to basement (right) View of basement storage room, looking
south (Source: MHBC, 2018)
Figures 32 & 33: (left) View of basement noting floor and wall materials (right) View of basement,
looking north (Source: MHBC, 2018)
November2021 MHBC 133
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
Figure 34: (left) View basement in Section'A', looking west towards ramp providing access to main floor
of Section 'C' (Source: MHBC, 2018)
Section W— Second/Main Floor '101
The main floor of Section 'A' is not at ground level. Instea Orris elevated above the ground level
above the basement. The second floor of Section 'A' h een altered
include partitioned walls
to function as office space. The building has been c Z
re-finished with 20th century
materials. It is important to note that the ceiling province of considerable fire damage,
v�
Figures 35 & 36: (left) View of second storey of Structure 'A' looking south (right) View of partitioned
walls and hallway in Structure'A', looking north (Source: MHBC, 2018)
November2021 MHBC 134
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
Figures 37 & 38: (left) View of room at north-west corner noting ceiling damage„ (right) Detail view of
room in second storey noting ceiling damage (Source: MHBC, 2018)
Figures 39 & 40: (left) Detail vi(
staircase leading to third storey
ceiling and fire dnage, second storey, (right) Detail view of former
ked off and decrmmissioned) (Source: MHBC, 2018)
Figures 41 & 42: (left) View of mid. century kitchenette at the rear of second storey (right) Detail view of
contemporary bathroom at the rear of Section 'A' (Source: MHBC, 2018)
November2021 MHBC 135
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
Section W- Third Floor
The third floor provides views of rooms which have been partitioned for office space. The rooms
have been re -finished and original finished have been removed.
Figures 45 & 46: (left) View of typical room in third storey, (right) View of property south of Charles
Street East, looking south from roof of Structure D', (Source: MHBC, 2018)
Section 'B'- Ground Floor
The ground floor of Section 'B' is the main entrance and access to the staircase. The floor is the with
the 'Eureka' brand name in the tile.
November2021 MHBC 136
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
Figures 47 & 48: (left) View of'Eureka'tile in ground floor of Section '13', (right) Detail view of retail
display case, looking west Source: MHBC, 2018)
Section 'B'— Second and Third Floor
This portion of Section 'B' facilitates as a staircase only and provides access to the roof. This portion
of the building provides evidence of water damage, including peeling t, mold and rot.
fir'
Figures 49 & 50: (left)
access to roof noting damage due to water egress, looking west (Source: MHBC, 2018)
M
Figure 51: (left) View of staircase looking towards second storey from ground floor (Source: MHBC,
2018)
November2021 MHBC 137
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
Section 'C'
Section 'Cis one room used as a retail area, with open concept storage areas towards the rear. The
interior of the building has been altered and provides little evidence of its construction date. The
roof may have been altered as it now appears to be contemporary metal roofing. All original
windows have either been removed and replaced with contemporary windows or been bricked -
over.
Figures 52 & 53: (left) View interior of north elevation, looking north towards retail showroom (right)
Figures 54 & 55: (left) Detail view of roof structure at the rear of Structure 'C', looking west (right) View
of ramp providing access to basement of Section W, looking west (Source: MHBC, 2018)
November2021 MHBC 138
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
Figures 56 & 57: (left) View rear storage rooms, looking east (right) View of narrow hallway of Section 'B'
to the left, with retail area within Section'C'to the right (Source: MHBC, 2018)
November2021 MHBC 139
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
5. O Evaluation of Cultural Heritage Resources
5.1 Evaluation Criteria
Ontario Regulation 9/06 prescribes that that:
A property maybe designated undersection 29 of the Act if it meets one or more or the following criteria
for determining whether it is of cultural heritage value or interest: A&
7. The property has design value or physical value because
i, is a rare, unique, representative or early l
a style, type, expression, material or
construction method,
ii, displays a high degree of craftsmanship ormerit, or
iii, demonstrates a high degree of technical or scientific achievement.
2. The property has historical value or associative value b*se it,
i, has direct associations with a theme, event, belief,, O2rson, activity, organization or institution
that is significant to a comunit
ii, yields, or has the potential toield info$ation that contributes to an understanding of a
community or culture,
iii, demonstratesr,ot reflects theork or ideas of an architect, artist, builder, designer or theorist
who is sig ant to a c my.
3. The property has contextua lue because it
i, is important in definincl, maintaining orsupporting the character of an area,
ii. is physically, functi°°onnaa""lly, visually or historically linked to its surroundings, or
iii, is a landmark.
November2021 MHBC 140
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
5,21027 King Street East
The property located at 1027 King Street East can be described as a roughly rectangular -shaped lot
with frontage on King Street East and frontage on Charles Street East. The property contains an
industrial building which is comprised of different sections, described in this report as'A', B','C', and
'D'. The building also includes a small single storey garage to the south of the industrial building
described in this report as Building F. Sections 'D' and 'E' were constructed in the second half of
the 20th century of cinder block construction, and these structures are not of significant cultural
heritage value or interest and are not included in the following sub -sections of this report.
5.2.1 Evaluation of Design/Physical Value
The property located at 1027 King Street East has modest A
n/physical value. The original
portion of the building (section 'A') can be described as is ustrial building constructed
c.1916 by Thomas A. Witzel. The building was cocted for Onward Manufacturing
Company. Additions were constructed between 19254nd 1 7. Sectio can be described as a
common industrial style building and includes architecturaiures (such as large windows) which
are common in the Edwardian period. Views of the building from the public realm compared to
the early 20th century photograph of the building demonstrate that the building has been altered
and had some original building fabric removed. All window have been altered or replaced and the
exterior has been parged and painted. Section 'B` f the structure was constructed in the Art Deco
style and includes features indicative of this perio his includes multiple windows and geometric
shapes, as well as a portico anderNj,, ea at t�#'ie main entrance. Some elements of Section 'B'
remain, but have been altered. Sewas constructed at some point between 1925 and 1947
and likely housed th ureka' Vanufacturing shops. All windows at the north elevation
have been replaced #a*,the entir uilding has been painted. All industrial -style windows with
multiple lights along the fa have been parged over. Only Section 'B' may be considered
representative of the Art De tyle of architecture as the majority of its attributes remain. The
building is not considered early, rare, and does not display a high degree of craftsmanship or artistic
merit.
It is important to note that a visual inspection of Building 'A' shows evidence of considerable
damage as the result of a fire which occurred at an unknown date. It is unknown whether or not
the extent of these damages affects the structural stability of the building and how this has an
impact on potential retention of the building.
5.2.2 Evaluation of Historical or Associative Value
The building located at 1027 King Street East has cultural heritage value primarily vested in its
historic use as the Onward Manufacturing Co. facility from 1916 to the 1980s. The building is also
November2021 MHBC 141
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
associated with Theodore A. Witzel and family as owners and managers. The company was known
for manufacturing and selling vacuums under the brand names Eureka and Triumph. The company
manufactured ammunition for the Second World War, and went on to expand business to include
barbecues, now known as Broil King and Stirling. The property is not likely to have the potential to
yield further information that contributes to the community. The architect or builder is unknown.
5.2.3 Evaluation of Contextual Value
The property located at 1027 King Street East has limited contextual value. The building remains in
its original location in-situ and does not demonstrate a significant functional or physical connection
to the subject lands or the surrounding landscape. The existing building at 1027 King Street East
terminates a view at the intersection of King Street East Onward Avenue (i.e. looking south from
Onward Avenue towards the front facade of the building.) Whi�ois view remains available, the
front facade of the building and front yard amenity area has been considerably altered. The
photograph of the building dated to the early 19th cent demonstrates the building originally
included a fenced -in open landscaped area to the fronting King Street. This would have
provided a complementary setting for the building <perty
e been removed and replaced with
a parking lot.
The City of Kitchener Statement of Significce for tat 1027 King Street East (See
Appendix B) identifies that "The original building is locate directly across from Onward Avenue
resulting in a clear view down Onward Avenue towards the front faQade of the original building. It
is clear that the original architect and builder ca idered the importance of siting the building
directly across from Onward Ave _
5.2.4 Heritage Attri
Section 'A':
3 storey scale and ma Wg with original brick construction and flat roof;
The existing windows at all elevations are not considered to be heritage attributes as they have been
altered or replaced.
Section 'B':
• 3 storey massing with multiple -light windows spanning the second and third storeys;
• Geometric details and roof shape near the roofline which is indicative of the Art Deco
architectural style;
• Large glass showroom at ground level;
• Gold and glass retail storefront and main entrance;
November2021 MHBC 142
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
While the existing pillar and portico structure remain, they have been altered are not considered
heritage attributes.
Section 'C':
• Single storey massing with very shallow pitched roof gable; and
• Arrangement of window openings, have 2 horizontal sets of 8 bays separated by bricks
within a rectangular -shaped frame.
The existing windows at all elevations have not been identified as heritage attributes as they have been
considerably altered or replaced.
Views:
• View of 1027 King Street (front faQade) looking soutl
5.6 Summary of Evaluation .%
sward Avenue.
A summary of the evaluation of cultural heritage value as per Ontario Regulation 9/06 is provided
below in chart form. While the property meets certain criterfor cultural heritage significance, the
heritage value of the property is modest. T e cultural h� ge value of the building is vested
primarily in its historical associations he operations ofthe Onward Manufacturing Co. and the
Witzel family.
Ontario Regulation 9/06
1027 King Street East (Sections 'A', 'B', and 'C')
1. Design/Physical V,
i. Rare, unique,:' representative
h
Only section 'B' is considered representative of a
or early exa A" of a style,
particular architectural style (Art Deco). All other
type, expressio ateri)r
portions of the building (Sections 'A' and 'C') have
construction meth v
been extensively altered and features have been
removed. As a result, Sections 'A' and 'C' have not
retained their heritage integrity and are not
considered representative of a particular
architectural style.
ii. Displays high degree of
No.
craftsmanship or artistic merit
iii. Demonstrates high degree of
No.
technical or scientific
achievement
2. Historical/associative value
i. Direct associations with a
Yes. Directly associated with the Onward
theme, event, belief, person,
Manufacturing Co. from approximately 1914 to at
November2021 MHBC 143
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East, City of Kitchener
activity, organization,
institution that is significant
ii. Yields, or has potential to yield
information that contributes
to an understanding of a
community or culture
iii. Demonstrates or reflects the
work or ideas of an architect,
artist, builder, designer, or
theorist who is significant to
the community.
3. Contextual value
i. Important in defining,
maintaining or supporting the
character of an area
ii. Physically, functionally,
visually, or historically linked to
its surroundings
iii. Is a landmark
least the 1980s. Also associated with Theodore A.
Witzel.
No.
Unknown. The architect of the building (and its
various additions) is unknown, but could be added to
the historic record should the information become
available in the future.
Yes. The view,othe erty looking south along
Onward Avenue has bee entified as a view of
cultural itage,value or i terest in the City of
Kitchener Heritage Landscape Study.
No.
November2021 MHBC 144
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
6, O Description of Proposed Development
6.1 Description of Proposed Development
The proposed development of the subject lands includes the demolition of all buildings and
structures to facilitate the construction of a mixed-use development with a 30 storey residential
tower and parking structure with rooftop amenity space. The proposed development will include
486 units and a total of 288 parking spaces. The parking structure in `1udes a multi-storey feature at
the front faQade which was designed to commemorate the Art Deco portion of the original building
(described in this report as Section 'B ii'). A copy of Si Plans and Elevations are provided in
Appendix A of this report.
C
Figure 58: Site Plan (Source: NEO Architecture Inc., 2021)
November2021 MHBC 145
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
The proposed parking structure with rooftop amenity space includes creative architectural details
which pay homage to the site as well as the City of Kitchener. The front faQade of the building
includes a stylized historic map of the City of Kitchener. The central portion of this building includes
a four storey feature which is reminiscent of the Art Deco tower of the original building in terms of
its overall form, scale and massing.
Architecture Inc., 2021)
0
parking structure (front elevation)
The faQade of the tower elemej includes images of the Art Deco tower using a historic
photograph of the buildirWLSeffgure below).
November2021 MHBC 146
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
l '
rr.•
,J; e
Figure 60: Rendering of proposed new tower
Architecture Inc., 2021)
(front elevation)
November2021 MHBC 147
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
7.01mpacts of Proposed Development
7.1 Classifications of Impacts
The impacts of a proposed development or change to a cultural heritage resource may occur over
a short or long term duration, and may occur during a pre -construction phase, construction phase
or post -construction phase. Impacts to a cultural heritage resource may also be site specific or
widespread, and may have low, moderate or high levels of physi�pact.
According to the Ontario Heritage Tool Kit, the following
result of a proposed development:
• Destruction;
• Alteration;
• Shadows;
• Isolation;
• Direct or indirect obstructio
• A change inland use; a
• Land disturbances.
The above noted ad
Impact Assessment.
7.2 Impacts of the P
7.2.1 Demolition of Section 'A'
negative impacts which may
considered as it relates to the scope of this Heritage
evelopment on 1027 King Street East
The proposed development includes the demolition of Section 'A' of the existing industrial
building. This section of the building is the original location of the Onward Manufacturing Co.
building constructed at some point between 1914 and 1916. The building was constructed in a
vernacular industrial architectural style as a 3 storey red brick building. The evaluation of this
building has concluded that the building does not demonstrate significant design/physical value
and has lost its heritage integrity. Section 'A' is not considered a rare, unique, or early form of
construction in Ontario. The building was constructed in a vernacular industrial style which is well
represented throughout Kitchener. Whilethe building would have been considered representative
of the vernacular industrial architectural style, the considerable alterations to the building over the
November2021 MHBC 148
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
years have resulted in the loss of the majority of its heritage attributes. Therefore, the proposed
demolition of the building is considered a negligible impact.
7.2.2 Demolition of Section 'B' (i & ii)
The proposed development includes the demolition of Section'B' of the existing industrial building.
This HIA concludes that Section 'B' was an addition to the original Section 'A' of the building and
was constructed at some point between 1925 and 1947. The building has design/physical value for
its construction in the Art Deco style of architecture. While the tower and its window arrangement
has been retained, the ground floor podium has been altered. However, the majority of heritage
attributes have been retained. According to the early 20th century photo of this portion of the
building, the podium included a delicate roof overhang which displayed the 'EUREKA' company
name. It is important to note that the existing gold retail display dow and door arrangement is
also original. Section 'B' is considered a representative exam he Art Deco architectural style.
Buildings in the Art Deco style are not common and
in Kitchener which have been retained and conserve
n
examples known
Therefore, the demolition of Section 'B' is considered an adverse impact as it would result in the
permanent removal of a building which h;
integrity and is considered a representative
for an industrial setting and purpose
7.2.3. Demolition of Section 'C'
The proposed develop
building. Section 'CvA
n/physical value and has retained its heritage
Art Deco architectural style employed
the demolition of Section 'C' of the existing industrial
6e original portion of the building, constructed at some
point between 1925 and 1947. Th uilding appears to have been constructed as a single storey
red brick industrial vernac r bui g, previously having multiple -light windows along the entire
east elevation. The existing w arrangement at the north elevation reflects the original, but
has been substantially altered to the extent which it no longer communicates its original design.
All original windows of the building have either been replaced (as with the north elevation) or
covered -over. This portion of the building has retained its original scale and massing but is altered
to the extent that it has lost much of its heritage integrity and is no longer a representative example
of the vernacular industrial architectural style. The demolition of Section 'C' of the building is
considered a negligible impact as it does not have significant design/physical value.
7.2.4 Alteration of Identified View
The City of Kitchener Statement of Significance for the property at 1027 King Street East (See
Appendix B) identifies that "The original building is located directly across from Onward Avenue
resulting in a clear view down Onward Avenue towards the front faQade of the original building. It
November2021 MHBC 149
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
is clear that the original architect and builder considered the importance of siting the building
directly across from Onward Avenue."
The following provides a comparison between existing views and those which would be available
should the proposed new building be constructed. Existing views along Onward Avenue are
terminated by the existing building located on the subject property. While the termination of the
view would change, the proposed new building continues to provide a focus at the terminus of
the view. The proposed new building includes the construction of the proposed parking garage
which has creative architectural elements (such as the new "tower" element) which will continue
to provide a view which is aesthetically pleasing (See Figures below and views analysis provided in
Appendix A).
Figures 61 & 62: View of 1027 Ki
proposed development on the SA
Red arrow indicates that the ex
approximately the same low
fist st losouth-east from Onward Avenue; Rendering of
LI ation) looking south-east from Onward Avenue,
FrMogriver and proposed new tower are positioned in
MHBC, 2021;NEO Architecture Inc., 2021)
Figures 63 & 64: View of 1027 King Street East looking south-east from Onward Avenue; Rendering of
proposed development on the subject lands (front elevation) looking south-east from Onward Avenue.
Red arrow indicates that the existing Art Deco tower and proposed new tower are positioned in
approximately the same location. (Source: MHBC, 2021;NEO Architecture Inc., 2021)
November2021 MHBC 150
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
7.3 Summary of Impact Analysis
As per the review provided above, the demolition of Sections Wand 'C' of the building constitute
a neutral impact. The demolition of Section 'B' is considered an adverse impact as it is the only
portion of the building which has design/physical value and has retained its heritage integrity.
The building (including sections 'A', 'B', and 'C') has historical associations with the Onward
Manufacturing Co. which operated from 1916 to about 1980 and Theodore A. Witzel.
The building (including Sections 'A','B', and 'C') has been identified in this report as being the only
feature of cultural heritage value or interest on the subject lands. The context and surrounding
landscape of the building has changed considerably over the years. As demonstrated with a review
of early 20th century photographs, Fire Insurance Plans, and ae photographs, the setting and
context has changed and evolved over the years. The existi Ing appears to have been the
only factory located on the block surrounded by King Sk t Fas , tawa Street South, Charles
Street Fast, and Borden Ave up until approximately th.. Os/1950s er e block slowly began to
develop with additional single detached residences, fa es/industrial buildings, and other
retail/service/commercial buildings usually associated wi he automotive industry. The early 20th
century photograph of the building depicting Sections ' and 'C' demonstrate that the north
portion of the lot fronting King Street included landscap ,. _ In space surrounded by a fence. The
demolition of the building is not anticipated to result in adverse impacts to the existing context
and setting.
The building has also beej IIIIIII' enti as part ofthe Onward Avenue potential Cultural Heritage
Landscape' as an exam o a s eighbourhood subdivision designed to co -exist with the
automobile. The cha er definin atu es of the landscape are listed as including the boulevard
along Onward Avenue and Crescervenue, curved and linear streets, mature trees, and residential
, g
and institutional buildings (inclu those of the Arts and Crafts style). The Onward Manufacturing
Co. building is not specifically entified as a heritage attribute or character defining feature of the
landscape. However, the building provides a termination to the view when looking south along
Onward Avenue.
1 City Staff have confirmed that the boundary of the Onward Avenue CHL are likely to be revised, and may result in
the exclusion of the subject property.
November2021 MHBC 151
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
8 , O Consideration of Development Alternatives,
Mitigation Measures and Conservation
Recommendations
8.1 Alternative Development Approaches
The following have been identified as a range of develo
as part of the heritage planning process.
impact on cultural heritage resources.
8.1.1 Do nothing
This option would result in the continued
retain the existing structures located along
various 'listed' properties on the sject lands.
�d
that may be considered
- from least to greatest
ity of the subject lands and would
es Street East, including that of the
Toption would preclude the redevelopment of
the property.
8.1.2 Develop the site win buildings
This option results in the retention all portions of the building located at 1027 King Street East.
As this Heritage Impact Assessment has demonstrated that the demolition of Sections Wand 'Cis
considered a neutral impact, the retention of these portions of the building is not necessary. The
demolition of Section 'B' of the building would constitute an adverse impact as it would result in
the demolition of a portion of the building which has design/physical value. The option to retain
all of the building located at 1027 King Street East is not recommended as it would not contribute
to a greater understanding of the community. Retaining portions of the building which have lost
their original heritage attributes and heritage integrity would not result in good conservation best
practices.
8.1.3 Develop the site while retaining a portion of the buildings
This option would result in demolishing portions of the existing building and retaining others for
the purpose of retention and conservation over the long-term. This Heritage Impact Assessment
has demonstrated that Section 'B' is the only portion of the existing building which has retained its
November2021 MHBC 152
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
heritage integrity. This option would include the demolition of sections Wand 'C' while retaining
and appropriately restoring Section 'B'to its original design quality. This option would result in the
ability to proceed with the proposed development (or an altered version thereof) while retaining a
portion of the existing building. This would also allow for the retention of a design feature which
would complement views of the property looking south along Onward Avenue. If this
development alternative is selected, it is recommended that the building be appropriately
conserved and restored so that original attributes remain. This alternative would result in less
impacts to cultural heritage resources given that the portion of the site with its cultural heritage
integrity intact could be restored.
In order to determine whether or not this alternative was a viable option, a structural assessment
was undertaken by Strik, Baldinelli and Monix on in June 22, 21. A copy of the structural
assessment is provided in Appendix C of this report. The stru I assessment provided valuable
input into determining the preferred alternative goin r The structural assessment
determined that "Due to the age and materials of the t r, it woul incredibly difficult for the
existing structure to comply with such [building] co This primariI ue to the following:
a) Confirmation has been provided in the str tura) reportthat the existing tower structure relies
IV
on adjacent buildings for structural stability. lstructural repoft states that, "...we are fairly certain
that the stair tower framing is supported by the existing tfuilding at the foundation, main floor,
second floor and roof level". Should this portion of the building be retained in its existing location
or re -located on-site, it wouldCd to be altered; to comply with current OBC standards. The
r
structural report identifies that ".. ely large stet structural steel columns and bracing would be
required." Further, that rbe including the temporary modification or removal of the
existing stairs would e s tural report identifies that the faQade of the tower may
be changed after con tioing from both temporary and permanent bracing. Therefore,
the existing components of tr would likely need to be substantially changed if the building
were to be retained. ®`
b) The use of hollow clay hocks in the construction of the tower also leads to difficulty in plans for
retaining the structure. The structural report identifies that the clay blocks would have been
manufactured before current codes which prescribe the compressive strength of masonry units
and are likely in a shape/form which is no longer manufactured. The strength of the existing
masonry would have to be tested.
The structural report concludes that the existing tower is not acceptable as a stand-alone structure
as it does not meet key building code and structural requirements. As a result, retaining the tower,
or even a portion of the faQade of the tower may not be feasible or alternatively, would result in a
tower which has been substantially altered.
November2021 MHBC 153
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
8.2 Mitigation Recommendations
The following provides a list of mitigation recommendations in regards to the proposed
development which includes the demolition of all buildings and structures on the property of
cultural heritage value or interest located at 1027 King Street East:
• Submission of a Salvage and Documentation Report which includes:
o Photographic descriptions and photo maps of the property and sections'A','B', and
'Cof the building; and
o Recommendations regarding salvage of any remaining original features;
• That some consideration be given to the possibility of retai ing salvaged elements on-site
in some capacity for commemorative purposes as wel
plaque which indicates that the property was once 040
Co.
• That the pro
continues to
e erection of a small bronze
ythe Onward Manufacturing
E�d a
such that there
ue looking south to King Street.
November2021 MHBC 154
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
9. O Recommendations and Conclusions
The building located on the subject property has historical associations with the Onward
Manufacturing Co. and Theodore A. Witzel. While this is true, its historical associations are modest.
While the building is associated with a business that operated throughout the 20' century, it is not
unlike many manufacturing businesses in the City. Documentation and commemoration measures
are recommended to appropriately recognize the historical value of the site.
As demonstrated with a review of early 20th century photogra Fire Insurance Plans, and aerial
photographs, the setting and context has changed and vver the years. The early 20th
century photograph of the building shows that the n portion e lot fronting King Street
included landscaped open space surrounded by a fe . This as been oved and covered into
a parking lot.
This Heritage Impact Assessment has deter the olition of Sections 'A' and 'C' of the
building constitute a negligible impact as e ns of the building have lost their
design/physical value and heritage integrity du unsympathetic alterations. The demolition of
Section 'B' is considered an adverse impact as it is the only portion of the building which has
design/physical value and has�otained its herit ge integrity. The proposed design of the new
building includes a "tower feature hick is reminiscent of the former Art Deco tower and
incorporates new elements which com nicate the history of the site, such as the use of historic
images and maps. This approach ippropriate and reinforces appreciation for the history of the
site. Mitigation recomme do fated to the removal of the Art Deco are provided in Section
8.2 of this report.
The building has been identified as part of the Onward Avenue potential Cultural Heritage
Landscape as an example of a 1920s era neighbourhood subdivision designed to co -exist with the
automobile. The Onward Manufacturing Co. building is not specifically identified as a heritage
attribute or character defining feature of the landscape. However, views of the building are
provided looking south-east along Onward Avenue. The redevelopment of the site will result in
changes to this view while ensuring that a terminus is provided along Onward Avenue. The
proposed design and siting are appropriate and is not anticipated to result in adverse impacts
which require mitigation recommendations.
Z City Staff have confirmed that the boundary of the Onward Avenue CHL are likely to be revised, and may result in
the exclusion of the subject property.
November2021 MHBC 155
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
10 , O Sources
Bloomfield, Elizabeth and Linda Foster. Waterloo County Councillors: A Collective Biography.
Caribout Imprints, 1995.
Blumenson, John. Ontario Architecture: A Guide to Styles and Building Terms 7874 to the Present.
Fitzhenry and Whiteside, 1990.
City of Kitchener. Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservat' District Study, 2006.
City of Kitchener. Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District Plan, 2007.
Eby,Ezra. A Biographical History of Early Settlers and their endantsin"Vl/ -loo Township. Kitchener,
ON: Eldon D. Weber, 1971.
English, John and Kennedth McLaughlin. Kitc er.,An 111 ted History. Robin Brass Studio, 1996.
Government of Canada. Parks Canada. Standa a es for the Conservation of Historic
Places in Canada. 2010.
Hayes, Geoffrey. Waterloo County: An Illu
Do Historical Society, 1997.
Heritage Resources Centr . Ontario Architectural Style Guide. University of Waterloo, 2009.
Mills, rych. Kitchenerc
7880-7960. Arcadia Publishing, 2002.
Ministry of Tourism, Culture port. InfoSheet#S Heritage Impact Assessments and Conservation
Plans, 2006
Moyer, Bill. Kitchener: Yesterday Revisited, An Illustrated History. Windsor Publications (Canada) Ltd.,
1979.
n/a. Busy Berlin, Jubilee Souvenir. 1897.
Ontario Ministry of Culture. Ontario Heritage Tool Kit: Heritage Resources in the Land Use Planning
Process, InfoSheet#2, Cultural Heritage Landscapes. Queens Printer for Ontario, 2006.
Uttley, W.V. (Ben), A History of Kitchener, Ontario. The Chronicle Press: Kitchener, 1937.
November2021 MHBC 156
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
W. V. Uttley and Gerald Noonan. A History of Kitchener., Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1975.
November2021 MHBC 157
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East, City of Kitchener
Appendix A
Site Plan, Elevations, Views Analysis (next page)
November2021 MHBC 158
otl;
�
3 h
�)
) Lu (
La
_aaJ
Q5
�
;;
\\
!)/})|
Q5
�
W
Luw z
IS
y a
H100S 133815 VMtI110
Lu
o Coco_
o
4t, o \
41
e
4�
4 —- s
a E P i y
i
�e
J�)
5a
0
41
LI w
sus='
4�
M
00 _
P
i I
I�w
sus='
4P
MF
t
r,
C w
C
Lu W
a
Um
kINTA, k, III I I I
6
O
00 _
IM
9.
c
t
'�71 71
E
Lu Ilu
A,
-------a IS
ul
LAI
tl
Tm
O
2
8 R
MR
ul
LAI
Iz
Tm
O
2
ul
LAI
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East, City of Kitchener
Appendix B
Terms of Reference and Statement of Significance,
City of Kitchener (next page)
November2021 MHBC 159
City of Kitchener
Community Services Department - Planning Division
Heritage Impact Assessment
Site Specific Terms of Reference
1001-1081 King St E, 14-22 Ottawa St S & 530-564 Charles St E
1.0 Background
Subject Property
The property municipally addressed as 1027 King Street East is listed as a non -designated property of
cultural heritage value and interest on the City's Municipal Heritage Register. A copy of the Statement of
Significance is attached.
The subject property is also located within the Onward Avenue Neighbourhood significant cultural
heritage landscape (CHL). A data sheet describing his CHL is available online —
www. kitchener.ca/cu lturaIheritagelandscapes.
Proposed Development
The site specific HIA terms of reference was prepare response to the pre -submission consultation
meeting held on January 11, 2018 for the properties m ally addressed as 1001-1081 King Street
East, 14-22 Ottawa Street South and 530-564 Charles Street East. The terms of reference was prepared
based on the pre -submission consultation application, which proposed the demolition of all buildings in
order to construct a multi -phased mixed use development with 12 and 18 storey residential buildings
and a 3-6 storey office/retail building.
HIA Requirement
The City of Kitchener requires the submission of a Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) as part of a
complete Planning Act application (e.g. Site Plan) for the properties municipally addressed as 1001-1081
King Street East, 14-22 Ottawa Street South and 530-564 Charles Street East. The following site specific
Terms of Reference shall be used to fulfil the condition regarding completion, approval and
implementation of a HIA prior to the consideration of an application made under the Planning Act.
A HIA is a study to determine the impacts to known and potential cultural heritage resources within a
defined area proposed for future development. The study shall include an inventory of all cultural
heritage resources within and adjacent to the planning application area. The study results in a report
which identifies all known cultural heritage resources, evaluates the significance of the resources, and
makes recommendations toward mitigative measures that would minimize negative impacts to those
resources. A Heritage Impact Assessment may be required on a property which is listed on the City's
Heritage Advisory Committee Inventory; listed on the City's Municipal Heritage Register; designated
under the Ontario Heritage Act, or where development is proposed adjacent to a protected heritage
property. The requirement may also apply to unknown or recorded cultural heritage resources which
are discovered during the development application stage or construction.
2.0 Heritage Impact Assessment Requirements
It is important to recognize the need for Heritage Impact Assessments at the earliest possible stage of
development or alteration. Notice will be given to the property owner and/or their representative as
early as possible. When the property is the subject of a Plan of Subdivision or Site Plan application,
notice of a Heritage Impact Assessment requirement will typically be given at the pre -application
meeting, followed by written notification to include specific terms of reference. The notice will inform
the property owner of any known heritage resources specific to the subject property and provide
guidelines to completing the Heritage Impact Assessment.
The following minimum requirements will be required in a Heritage Impact Assessment:
2.1 Present owner contact information for properties proposed for development and/or site
alteration.
2.2 A detailed site history to include a listing of owners from the Land Registry Office, and a history
of the site use(s).
2.3 A written description of the buildings, structures and landscape features on the subject
properties including: building elements, building materials, architectural and interior finishes,
natural heritage elements, and landscaping. The description will also include a chronological
history of the buildings' development, such as additions and demolitions.
The attached Statement of Significance for 1027 King Street East outlines the cultural heritage
value and interest as well as an initial list of heritage attributes. In addition, the Kitchener
Cultural Heritage Landscape Study describes the Onward Avenue Neighbourhood cultural
heritage landscape along with its cultural heritage value and heritage attributes. The report shall
consider the cultural heritage value and heritage attributes in its evaluation of development
options and the recommended appropriate level of conservation.
2.4 Documentation of the sct pr sties to include: current photographs of each elevation of
the buildings, photograph entified heritage attributes and a site plan drawn at an
appropriate scale to understa the context of the buildings and site details. Documentation
shall also include where available, current floor plans, and historical photos, drawings or other
available and relevant archival material.
2.5 An outline of the proposed development, its context, and how it will impact the properties
(buildings, structures, and site details including landscaping). In particular, the potential visual
and physical impact of the proposed development on the identified heritage attributes of the
properties shall be assessed.
The Heritage Impact Assessment must consider potential negative impacts as identified in the
Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport's Ontario Heritage Tool Kit. Negative impacts may
include but are not limited to: alterations that are not sympathetic or compatible with the
cultural heritage resource; demolition of all or part of a cultural heritage resource; etc. The
outline should also address the influence and potential impact of the development on the
setting and character of the subject properties.
In particular, the report shall consider the visual relationship between the Onward Avenue
Neighbourhood significant cultural heritage landscape and the listed property at 1027 King
Street East, including views down Onward terminating at the original building.
2.6 Options shall be provided that explain how the cultural heritage resources may be conserved,
relating to their level of importance. Methods of mitigation may include, but are not limited to
preservation/conservation in situ, adaptive re -use, relocation, commemoration and/or
documentation. Each mitigative measure should create a sympathetic context for the heritage
resource.
In particular, the report should consider an option with full retention of the original circa 1914
Industrial Vernacular building and the 1946 Art Deco influenced addition.
2.7 A summary of the heritage conservation principles and how they will be used must be included.
Conservation principles may be found in online publications such as: the Standards and
Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (Parks Canada); Eight Guiding
Principles in the Conservation of Built Heritage Properties (Ontario Ministry of Tourism, Culture
and Sport); and, the Ontario Heritage Tool Kit (Ontario Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport).
2.8 Proposed alterations and demolitions must be justified and explained as to any loss of cultural
heritage value and impact on the streetscape/neighbourhood co
text.
Since the preferred proposal is to demolish all existing building a report must evaluate
whether demolition is an acceptable level of conservation, and if so, clearly explain why
demolition is acceptable based on heritage conservation principles (see 2.7 above).
2.9 Recommendations shall be as specific as possible, describing and illustrating locations,
elevations, materials, landscaping, etc.
2.10 The qualifications and background of the person(s) completing the Heritage Impact Assessment
shall be included in the report. The author(s) must demonstrate a level of professional
understanding and competence in the heritage conservation field of study. The report will also
include a reference for any literature cited, and a list of people contacted during the study and
referenced in the report.
3.0 Summary Statement and Conservation Recommendations
The summary statement should provide a full description of:
■ The significance and heritage attributes of the subject properties.
■ The identification of any impact the proposed development will have on the heritage
attributes of the subject properties. Based on recent proposals, negative impacts may
include changes to the context, partial demolition and/or full demolition.
■ An explanation of what conservation or mitigative measures, or alternative
development, or site alteration approaches are recommended.
■ Clarification as to why specific conservation or mitigative measures, or alternative
development or site alteration approaches are not appropriate.
4.0 Mandatory Recommendation
The consultant must write a recommendation as to whether the subject properties are worthy
of listing or designation under the Ontario Heritage Act. Should the consultant not support
heritage designation then it must be clearly stated as to why the subject property does not meet
the criteria as stated in Regulation 9/06.
The following questions must be answered in the mandatory recommendation of the report:
1. The City has already confirmed that 1027 King Street East meets the City of Kitchener's
criteria for listing on the Municipal Heritage Register as a Non -Designated Property of
Cultural Heritage Value or Interest.
2. Do the properties meet the criteria for heritage designation under Ontario Regulation 9/06
of the Ontario Heritage Act? Why or why not?
3. If the subject properties do not meet the criteria for designation then it must be clearly
stated as to why they do not.
4. Regardless of the failure to meet criteria for heritage listing or designation, do the
properties warrant conservation as per the definition in the Provincial Policy Statement?
Why or why not?
5.0 Approval Process
Three (3) hard copies of the Heritage Impact Assessment and one electronic pdf format burned
on CD shall be provided to Heritage Planning staff. Both the hard and electronic copies shall be
marked with a "DRAFT" watermark background. The Heritage Impact Assessment will be
reviewed by City staff to determine whether all requirements have been met and to review the
preferred option(s). Following the review of the Heritage Impact Assessment by City staff, three
(3) hard copies and one electronic copy of the final Heritage Impact Assessment ("DRAFT"
watermark removed) will be required. The copies of the final Heritage Impact Assessment will
be considered by the Director of Planning. Note that Heritage Impact Assessments may be
circulated to the City's Heritage Kitchener Committee for information and discussion. A Site Plan
Review Committee meeting may not be scheduled until the City's Heritage Kitchener Committee
has been provided an opportunity to review and provide feedback to City staff.
Heritage Impact Assessments may be subject to a peer review to be conducted by a qualified
heritage consultant at the expense of the City of Kitchener. The applicant will be notified of
Staff's comments and acceptance, or rejection of the report. An accepted Heritage Impact
Assessment will become part of the further processing of a development application under the
direction of the Planning Division. The recommendations within the final approved version of
the Heritage Impact Assessment may be incorporated into development related legal
agreements between the City and the proponent at the discretion of the municipality.
The applicant is encouraged to submit the report to Heritage Planning staff for review prior to
submission of a complete Planning Act (e.g. Site Plan) application in order to prevent delays that
may result due to insufficient review time and the need to consult the City's Heritage Kitchener
committee.
City of Kitchener
Community Services Department - Planning Division
Conservation Plan - Terms of Reference
I ntrnrh irtinn
The following Terms of Reference shall be used to fulfill the condition regarding completion and
approval of a Conservation Plan prior to the consideration of an application made under the Planning
Act. The Conservation Plan shall address how the cultural heritage resources and attributes as identified
and described in an approved Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA), will be conserved.
A Conservation Plan is a document which identifies the conservation principles appropriate for the type
of cultural heritage resource/attributes being conserved; provides detailed documentation of the
resource and its heritage attributes; includes an assessment of current conditions and deficiencies; and
recommends conservation measures and interventions in the short, medium and long term to ensure
preservation of the property's cultural heritage significance.
Policy Context
Section 2 of the Planning Act indicates that Council shall have regard to matters of Provincial interest
such as the conservation of features of significant architectural, cultural, historical, archaeological or
scientific interest. In addition, Section 3 of the Planning Act re uires that decisions of Council shall be
consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement.
Policy 2.6.1 of the Provincial Policy Statement requires that nificant built heritage resources and
significant cultural heritage landscapes shall be conserved. The Provincial Policy Statement defines a
built heritage resource as including resources listed by local jurisdictions. Significant is defined as
resources that are valued for the important contribution they make to our understanding of the history
of a place, an event, or a people and notes that while some significant resources may already be
identified and inventoried by official sources, the significance of others can only be determined after
evaluation. Conserved is defined as meaning the identification, protection, management and use of built
heritage resources, cultural heritage landscapes and archaeological resources in a manner that ensures
their cultural heritage value or interest is retained under the Ontario Heritage Act. This may be achieved
by the implementation of recommendations set out in a conservation plan, archaeological assessment,
and/or heritage impact assessment. Mitigative measures and/or alternative development approaches
can be included in these plans and assessments.
Conservation Plan Requirements
• Present owner contact information for property proposed for development and/or alteration.
• Identification of all cultural heritage resource(s) and a clear statement of their cultural heritage
value and interest, including a bullet point list of their heritage attributes.
• Identification of the conservation principles and guidelines to be applied for the type of heritage
resource/attributes being conserved and the specific conservation work to be undertaken in order
to repair, maintain and protect the heritage resources and attributes. These conservation principles
and guidelines may be found in publications such as: Parks Canada — Standards and Guidelines for
the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada; Eight Guiding Principles in the Conservation of
Building Heritage Properties, Ontario Ministry of Culture; and, the Ontario Ministry of Culture's
Ontario Heritage Tool Kit (all available online).
• An assessment of the current condition of the cultural heritage resources and their heritage
attributes. The Conservation Plan must identify the physical condition and integrity of the cultural
heritage resources and their heritage attributes, with a view toward making recommendations
regarding appropriate repair and maintenance, in keeping with good conservation practice.
• Identification of the short, medium and long term vision for the conservation of the heritage
resources, and of the specific conservation measures to be undertaken in the short, medium, and
long-term. Such measures shall describe the documentation, stabilization, repair, monitoring and
maintenance strategies required to be undertaken for each phase, and shall reference the
qualifications for anyone responsible for undertaking such work.
This section may include, but is not be limited to, the following:
Short -Term Conservation Work
• Documentation (through detailed description and photographs) of heritage attributes
proposed to be demolished, removed, salvaged or otherwise irreversibly damaged.
• Description and specifications for work required to be undertaken to conserve heritage
attributes in need of immediate repair and stabilization to prevent further deterioration,
damage and the potential loss of such attributes.
• monitoring strategy to protect the property from vandalism or fire (e.g. methodology
for monitoring; fregLencf monitoring; and process to address issues that arise
through monitorin
• Descri and splUcatlW for work required to be undertaken to heritage attributes
as par the proposed development and/or rehabilitation (to include demolition,
removal salvage of heritage attributes; the stabilization, repair and cleaning of
heritage attr and the reconstruction or replacement of heritage attributes). Such
work may be diva ed into phases.
Long -Term Conservation Work
• Identification of a monitoring program addressing appropriate measures for the ongoing
maintenance of the heritage resources and attributes, post development/rehabilitation.
• Provide a recommended schedule for conservation work, inspections, monitoring,
maintenances and phases (short, medium, and long-term).
• The Conservation Plan must include a cost estimate of the conservation work to be undertaken in
the short-term to heritage attributes in need of immediate repair and stabilization to prevent
further damage and deterioration. Such cost estimate must be prepared by a qualified individual or
consultant. In order to ensure implementation of the Conservation Plan, the City may require the
owner to post a Letter of Credit equal to the value of the short-term conservation work as a
condition of the approval of the subject application.
• The qualifications and background of the person(s) completing the Conservation Plan shall be
included in the report. The author(s) must demonstrate a I vel of professional understanding and
competence in the field of heritage conservation. The ret will also include a reference for any
literature cited, and a list of people contacted during t udy and referenced in the report.
Approval Process
Five hard copies of the Conservation Plan and one electronic pdf format burned on disk shall be
provided to Heritage Planning staff. Both the hard and electronic copies will be marked with a DRAFT
watermark. The Conservation Plan will be reviewed by Heritage Planning staff and a recommendation
will be made to the Director of Planni pproval of the Conservation Plan by the Director of Planning is
required prior to issuance of appro&Fof the application. Approval of the Conservation Plan may result
in the establishment of develo pm eril related legal agreements or conditions of development approval.
ment of Significance
KING STREET EAST
Municipal Address:
1027 King Street East, Kitchener
Legal Description:
Plan 404 Lot 16 to 18 Lot 27 to 29 Part
Lot 25
Year Built: 1914
Architectural Style:
Art Deco
Original Owner: Onward
Manufacturing Company Limited
Original Use: Institutional
983
991,995,
1001
loci k�,�
9015
520
528
530
534 1027 1051 1085
542
1081 ca
584
14 O
"V 22 9105
S S,
T�
Condition: Good
Description of Historic Place
1027 King Street East was originally a two storey early 20th century building built in the Industrial
Vernacular architectural style. Various additions and modifications have occurred to the building
resulting in no single distinct architectural style. One interesting addition was the construction of
a central tower addition, which is influenced by the Art Deco architectural style. The building is
situated on a 0.76 acre parcel of land located on the south side of King Street East between
Borden Avenue and Ottawa Street in the King East Planning Community of the City of Kitchener
within the Region of Waterloo. The principal resource that contributes to the heritage value is
the original building and Art Deco addition.
Heritage Value
1027 King Street East is recognized for its contextual, historical and associative values.
The original building is representative of industrial vernacular architecture. The building is three
bays wide by six bays deep. Three bays face both King Street East and Charles Street East.
The main fagade is King Street East. The building features: brick construction; brick pilasters;
large window openings; and, concrete headers and sills.
The contextual value relates to the buildings location and design. The fagade of the original
building is parallel to King Street East and is perpendicular to Onward Avenue. The original
building is located directly across from Onward Avenue resulting in a clear view down Onward
Avenue towards the front fagade of the original building. It is clear that the original architect and
builder considered the importance of siting the building directly across from Onward Avenue.
The historic and associative values relate to the original owner and use of the building as well
as the architect of the 1946 addition. The original owner was Theodore Adam Witzel of the
Onward Manufacturing Company Limited. In 1906, Mr. Witzel's company became the first in
Canada to manufacture and sell hand vacuum sweepers and electric vacuum cleaners under
the trade names of Onward and Triumph. The company was renamed Onward Manufacturing
Company Limited in 1908. In 1908 a second company, The Eureka Vacuum Cleaner Company,
was established. The vacuums were manufactured in the US while the Onward Manufacturing
Company Limited focused on product distribution throughout Canada. The plant opened at 1027
King Street East, Kitchener, in 1914. The Eureka and Onward companies were amalgamated
under the name Onward Manufacturing Company Limited in 1924. After the war, the company
expanded to manufacture cabinet and utility hardware in 1946. Mr. Witzel died in 1948 and his
son Theodore Andrew Witzel Senior (1918-1995) became the President. The company
continued to grow between 1949 and 1960 with the introduction of home appliance distribution.
In 1966, National Union Electric Corporation of Stamford, Connecticut purchased 80% of the
Eureka vacuum cleaner and appliance distribution division as well as the name Onward
Manufacturing Company Limited. T.A. Witzel, Sr. remained President of Onward Manufacturing
Limited until his resignation in 1974. He retained ownership and was President of Onward
Hardware Limited for the manufacturing and selling of cabinet and general hardware and
developed another Company he owned known as Tawco Limited for commercial cleaning
equipment distribution and franchising coin operated laundry and dry cleaning stores. Vernon's
Directory records suggest that the business operated at 1027 King Street East for approximately
67 years until 1981. Around that time, Onward Hardware began to manufacture fireplace inserts
and charcoal water smokers and an appliance retail division (now known as T.A. Appliance
Warehouse) was established at 932 Victoria Street North, Kitchener. T.A. Witzel Senior passed
away in 1995 and the company is now owned and operated by his three sons. The company
was divided into three separate companies in 2000. The barbecue division adopted the original
name "Onward Manufacturing Company Limited", the hardware division became "Onward
Cluthe Hardware Products Inc.", and the appliance division became "TA Appliance Inc." All
three companies continue to operate.
The architects of the 1946 addition to the building at 1027 King Street East were William Stuart
Jenkins and Sherman W. Wright. Jenkins and Wright were best known for their designs of
municipal arena complexes in several Ontario towns and for the restoration in 1952 of
`Woodside' the home of William Lyon Mackenzie King. Jenkins and Wright were the architects
for the Kitchener Memorial Auditorium.
Heritage Attributes
The heritage value of 1027 King Street East resides in the following heritage attributes:
All elements related to the construction and Industrial Vernacular architectural style of the
building, including:
o Roof and roofline;
o Large window openings, including concrete*a nd sills; and,
o Brick construction, including brick pilasters;
■ All elements related to the context, includin he relationshi the original building to
King Street and Onward Avenue.
c� ❑b.0
C �
Ll
Ll
Ll
Ll
❑
Ll
❑ 4i5z w O O
Z Z p O z
LU ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
C 0 ❑ j
0 0 � o
c c >' Y
Y Y O
C � D
C D
D ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ Q
Q Q Q z Q
Z Z z Z
w
M1•
C
Ll
O_
Ll
❑
❑
O
2
O
N
v
L
wE
°
N
❑
f0 0
X CN
O
N
-O
6
t M1•
}
❑
}
❑
Q
M1.
LU
7 M1•
''
M
'E'
O
Z
O
Z
f0
O_
f0 O
C ._ p
f0
V
°
0
Y
D
❑
O
❑
-
-m
O O N
N N
t
a
N
O
O t
° -
>
C
7
Z
Z
}' p
�
27
> 0) CL
E t
O
C T
V 'r
Ll
Ll
LlLl
N
Ql
e
O
bb
O
O
0
O
0
3
a
N
�
V
E
V N V
2 p
_
f0
(�
N N
ii N C
Y
p f0
p
C
O O
C O
V
N
Gal
.y
❑
m �
m 0
s
.c
>.�
.�
C
Q
Q
2 E
v -
°
,C
z z
°-
N
in
p
O
n V
D O
co
a
Z
❑ ❑
bn
❑
7 O
w
C
0
i
N
s
7
u0
E
7
p 00
OV t
V
2
C
M1
'O '6
O
° in
v
N
0
N
O
O
n
in
N
V
_
+O+
N
w
Ll
❑
Ll
❑
❑
❑
❑
v
❑
}
}
}
❑
}
❑
N
}
Q
D
Z
LU
p
Z
O
Z
O
Z
O
Z
❑
O
V
CO
{n
Z
❑
O
c
Y
C
D
❑
O
Y
D
❑
O
Y
D
❑
O
O
C
D
°
0
Y
D
❑
O
❑
❑
❑
Q
a
Q
Z
Q
Z
Q
Z
❑
Q
Z
Z
w
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
v
}
z
LU
O
O
O
°
Z
Z
Z
Z
❑
V 'r
Ll
Ll
LlLl
c
e
O
C
O
O
0
O
0
3
0
C
Y
C
Y
Y
D
C
C
�
❑
❑
❑
a
Z
z z
Z
V
vv
Z
❑ ❑
bn
❑
7 O
w
C
0
i
N
7
V
E
7
p 00
OV t
V
2
C
M1
'O '6
O
° in
v
N
0
N
O
N 7
0
in
N
(0
V
_
+O+
N
O t
hp
+L+
O
r`•
tip
7 O
o O
O `�
—
N 0)
O
c
t
-6
bD U
L C
V
,T
O
i
Q 0
N N
O
=
o
o
V
v 3
E E
'O N
O_
=
'i 'V
°
O 0
°
p O
N
-0O
c
p Q,
O O ,_
N
UO bn
-°
>
Y
C
V
v O1
2 u N
-6
o
+
Oi
_
+t+
o
U
O_CL�
Z!
N
_
tCL
o V
N
V1
v
C
i+
o
ai
`o
iL+
0
o
0
0
3 .c
o V
a
o
v
X
T
Y
c
ice+
C
tl9
O
£
W
G-
Q
C
C
U
O
V
+�
!/Of
V
`O
0
N
E E
m E
O
V
ON
Z LL v)
p
❑
❑
p
❑
m
N
N
p
p
O
v
>
>
v
z
❑
p
p
v
❑
°
z
O
z
o
z
Ll
LU
❑
0
c
3
LU
❑
❑
❑
z
z
Llo
O
g
Llz
D
0
0
0
o
Ov
3
Ll°
O
Y
Y
3
O
m
DcaLn
V
D
Y
D
C
D
OY
D
Z
°
C
o
of
❑
D
O
DLl
Y
O¢
¢
¢
a
\
z
Z
❑
Q
Z
\
Q
Q
w
❑
w
❑
p
v
}
p
v
^
p
v
❑
v
}
>
}
O
}
z
p
p
>
>
❑
❑
o
p
oLl
0
z
0
z
LU�
❑
z
LU
z
O
O
Ll
LlZ
z
Ll
O
LU
Ll
3
0
0
Ll°c
Ll3
C
Y
3
C
Y
Y
�
Y
C
O
C
�
N
N
D
D
Y
C
Ll�
Ll
LlD
=
Q
E
Ll
Q
Q
Q
❑
z
N
0
\
Z
z
zvQ
_ N
0
z
o
s o
m
v -0
c
O
w
c
cn
io
cn w a
c v
cn .
v
.E
CL
o
E v
c"
r..
u= c w o
u
c
O
>
M1
H
O
°
m c a
C. a a s
>
o Cm
o� v
O
o°
v
c
°
Ojj
v v L
�°
um
0 1 11
o'�oo
o_
=E
v�
CL
0
00 •�
u
o cn
QO OJ
0 M ,
> —
0
to
N
Un
Vt N
Un
L Un O
-0
v
V z!
ov
i o E
0
E
m
c
a
°
t
=
v v° a o,
m a c
v o
E
°
o
o
V
2 Z°
o
v N o
O c sn
E m u w
c
o Oi
O
N
O
c
L
N io
w
O
O z 0
D
N—
vi
Q
N
°_
n)CL
O O C
.2
N
O
°-
E
Q,
v o a
E
v
0> a Y o
\
Ln
Q
V
O N
Z LL
O°
0 V O
O° a i
0 LL Q O
O N
Z LL v)
Statement of Significance
1027 KING STREET EAST
Municipal Address:
1027 King Street East, Kitchener
Legal Description:
Plan 404 Lot 16 to 18 Lot 27 to 29 Part
Lot 25
Year Built: 1914
Architectural Style:
Art Deco
Original Owner: Onward
Manufacturing Company Limited
Original Use: Institutional
Condition: Good
fl�
1fl0,
,007 kj
,0,55;
520
526
.sao
J�534 10271089
542 . 1951
,OB, r7h
594. h�
h
C
,4
22
,i05
Description of Historic Place
1027 King Street East was originally a two storey early 2e century building built in the Industrial
Vernacular architectural style. Various additions and modifications have occurred to the building
resulting in no single distinct architectural style_ One interesting addition was the construction of
a central tower addition, which is influenced by the Art Deco architectural style. The building is
situated on a 0.76 acre parcel of land located on the south side of King Street East between
Borden Avenue and Ottawa Street in the King East Planning Community of the City of Kitchener
within the Region of Waterloo. The principal resource that contributes to the heritage value is
the original building and Art Deco addition.
Heritage Value
1027 King Street East is recognized for its contextual, historical and associative values.
The original building is representative of industrial vernacular architecture. The building is three
bays wide by six bays deep. Three bays face both King Street East and Charles Street East_
The main fagade is King Street East. The building features: brick construction; brick pilasters;
large window openings; and, concrete headers and sills_
The contextual value relates to the buildings location and design. The facade of the original
building is parallel to King Street East and is perpendicular to Onward Avenue. The original
building is located directly across from Onward Avenue resulting in a clear view down Onward
Avenue towards the front facade of the original building. It is clear that the original architect and
builder considered the importance of siting the building directly across from Onward Avenue.
The historic and associative values relate to the original owner and use of the building as well
as the architect of the 1946 addition. The original owner was Theodore Adam Witzel of the
Onward Manufacturing Company Limited. In 1906, Mr. Witzel's company became the first in
Canada to manufacture and sell hand vacuum sweepers and electric vacuum cleaners under
the trade names of Onward and Triumph. The company was renamed Onward Manufacturing
Company Limited in 1908. In 1908 a second company, The Eureka Vacuum Cleaner Company,
was established. The vacuums were manufactured in the US while the Onward Manufacturing
Company Limited focused on product distribution throughout Canada. The plant opened at 1027
King Street East, Kitchener, in 1914. The Eureka and Onward companies were amalgamated
under the name Onward Manufacturing Company Limited in 1924. After the war, the company
expanded to manufacture cabinet and utility hardware in 1946. Mr. Witzel died in 1948 and his
son Theodore Andrew Witzel Senior (1918-1995) became the President. The company
continued to grow between 1949 and 1960 with the introduction of home appliance distribution.
In 1966, National Union Electric Corporation of Stamford, Connecticut purchased 80% of the
Eureka vacuum cleaner and appliance distribution division as well as the name Onward
Manufacturing Company Limited. T.A. Witzel, Sr. remained President of Onward Manufacturing
Limited until his resignation in 1974. He retained ownership and was President of Onward
Hardware Limited for the manufacturing and selling of cabinet and general hardware and
developed another Company he owned known as Tawco Limited for commercial cleaning
equipment distribution and franchising coin operated laundry and city cleaning stores. Vernon's
(Directory records suggest that the business operated at 1027 King Street East for approximately
67 years until 1981. Around that time, Onward Hardware began to manufacture fireplace inserts
and charcoal water smokers and an appliance retail division (now known as T.A. Appliance
Warehouse) was established at 932 Victoria Street North, Kitchener. T.A. Witzel Senior passed
away in 1995 and the company is now owned and operated by his three sons. The company
was divided into three separate companies in 2000. The barbecue division adopted the original
name "Onward Manufacturing Company Limited", the hardware division became "Onward
Cluthe Hardware Products Inc.", and the appliance division became "TA Appliance Inc." All
three companies continue to operate.
The architects of the 1946 addition to the building at 1027 King Street East were William Stuart
Jenkins and Sherman W. Wright. Jenkins and Wright were best known for their designs of
municipal arena complexes in several Ontario towns and for the restoration in 1952 of
'Woodside' the home cf William Lyon Mackenzie King. Jenkins and Wright were the architects
for the Kitchener Memorial Auditorium.
Heritage Attributes
The heritage value of 1027 King Street East resides in the following heritage attributes:
All elements related to the construction and Industrial Vernacular architectural style of the
building, including:
o Roof and roofline;
o Large window openings, including concrete headers and sills; and,
o Brick construction, including brick pilasters;
• All elements related to the context, including the relationship of the original building to
King Street and Onward Avenue.
Photo
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East City of Kitchener
Appendix C
Structural Assessment (next page)
0
November2021 MHBC 160
I K
LONDON LOCATION
KITCHENER LOCATION
JTR
BA L I h� E L Ll
MMONIZ
1599 Adelaide St. N., Units 301 & 203
London, ON N5X 4E8
1415 Huron Rd., Unit 225
Kitchener, ON N2R OL3
P: 519-471-6667
P: 519-725-8093
www.sbmltd.ca
sbm@sbmltd.ca
PLANNING • OVIL • STRUCTURAL • MECHANICAL • ELECTRICAL
June 22, 2021
SBMW-20-397
Attn:
Re: 1027 King Street East, Kitchener, ON
Using the front stair tower as a stand-alone structure
Stephen;
At your request, personnel from SBM attended the site on December 8, 2020, to review the construction of the front stair
tower at the subject building. It is our understanding that you are inquiring about the possibility of demolishing the rest of
the building and leaving the front stair tower as a stand-alone structure. Please accept this letter as a summary of our
observations, recommendations, and conclusions.
Our review was a non-invasive visual inspection of the interior and exterior of the front stair tower. The exterior was
reviewed from the ground level and the roof of the mai g only. ave not performed any detailed calculations
or destructive investigations unless specifically noted.
1 OBSERVATIONS
1. Based on the methods of construction an a edition of the building, the building appears to be approximately
90 to 100 years old. The front stair tower is likely connected to adjacent structures on three sides with an
approximate building area (footprint) of 13,900 sq.ft. The adjacent buildings vary in height but are 2 to 2.5 storeys
high. The building was reportedly constructed in phases.
2. A previous inspection by SBM of the building on the right of the stair tower revealed signs of fire damage and
deterioration to some of the main structural timber beams.
3. The stair tower was site measured to be approximately 13'-9" wide x 11'-10" deep x 41'-3" high. There appears to
be an 8'-10" high attic space over the stair tower.
4. The total percentage of openings in the front elevation is approximately 43%. The front door/window glazing
extends the full width of the tower main floor, leaving no available shear walls. The window glazing at the second
and third floor is centred in the wall and is approximately 54% of the wall length, leaving only approximately 3'-3"
of available shear wall each side of the window.
5. The exterior walls were measured at the second -floor exterior door opening to be approximately 13.5" thick. A
%" cementitious parging was locally removed from the interior face of the stair tower to expose a clay brick or
block, approximately 8" high. A small hole in the brick indicates the clay block is hollow.
6. The front and sides of the stair tower are clad with a 4" thick concrete panel veneer. The rear elevation has a
brick veneer. The concrete panel veneer has localized areas of minor spalling throughout. The concrete veneer is
painted. The paint is in poor condition.
Strik, Baldinelli, Moniz Ltd.
www.sbmltd.ca
SBM W-20-397
7. Based on our experience with other low-rise buildings on King Street of similar age and construction, it is likely
the exterior walls are constructed of 8" hollow clay block with a 4" concrete panel or brick veneer.
AFA 0
Algol
Clay block wall at 936 King Street E, is likely the same material utilized to construct the stair tower at 1027 King Street E.
8. The stairs are structural steel with a concrete topping.
9. Visually, the stair tower walls appear plumb and there is little to V rac ` ing, spalling or deterioration in the
superstructure indicating that the walls are not currently over ssed.
10. The foundation wall for the stair tower is a cast -in-place crete wall and is shared with the adjacent three
structures. There is no cracking in the foundation walls o dente of settlement.
11. The footings below the tower and balance of
12. At the basement level (Car Quest basement), the
rubble stone foundation wall.
2 RECOMMENDAITONS
My professional opinion on the to
are Nnown.
combination of old cast -in-place concrete and
Ione entity is as follows:
1. The existing stair tower appears to hWe been constructed before the Ontario Building Code was enacted into law
and would have been constructed in accordance with good building practices at the time of construction. For the
existing tower to be modified to a stand alone -structure it would have to be reviewed in accordance with live,
snow, wind and seismic loads prescribed by the current Ontario Building Code. The masonry structure would
need to be evaluated in accordance with the current masonry design code CSA 5304. Due to the age and
materials of the tower, it would be incredibly difficult for the existing structure to comply with such
codes. Current engineering standards and best practises have much more rigorous guidelines for earthquake
design, allowable deflection tolerances, insulation, reinforcing etc
2. The clay blocks would have been manufactured before the current code prescribed the compressive strength of
masonry units. Additionally, the cross section of the block is likely not a shape that is currently manufactured. A
localized section of block would have to be removed and tested in accordance with CSA CAN3-A82.2 "Methods of
sampling and testing brick" to determine the compressive strength of the existing material.
3. Although the existing building is covered with finishes, we are fairly certain that the stair tower framing is
supported by the existing building at the foundation, main floor, second floor and roof level.
4. Given the scope of the site visit, we are uncertain if the concrete panel or brick veneer is supported at the roof
level or if the veneer is full height and extends below the roof. The cladding on the sides and rear of the stair
www.sbmltd.ca
SBM W-20-397
tower below the roof level of the adjacent building should be confirmed before decisions are made to ensure
there is cladding present and that the cladding matches the visible cladding above the roof.
5. We have not completed a detailed structural analysis, but a review of CSA 5304 Annex F Empirical Design
indicates that the existing tower is not acceptable as a stand-alone structure as it does not meet the following
requirements:
a. The tower walls require minimum 85% of the wall to remain in order to adequately resist wind loading
(to just pick one of many design criteria). The large opening in the front elevation of the tower is
approximately 55% of the wall length.
b. Also shear wall segments must be minimum 10'-0" long.
c. Due to the openings in the front elevation, the front wall does not have an adequate shear wall resulting
in the tower being analyzed as a 3 -sided structure. Empirically, the masonry code requires a minimum of
2 noncolinear walls.
3 CONCLUSIONS
Due to the age of the building and the fair condition of the structural elements of the existing stair tower, the tower
appears structurally adequate to remain in service in the existing capacity while supported by the existing adjacent
buildings.
Although we have not completed a detailed structural analysis, based on our experience with the inspections of old
masonry structures, the analysis and/or design of similar structures, and the number of empirical code requirements
that are violated, it is our opinion that the tower is likely not structurally adequate to act as a stand-alone structure
without significant reinforcing. Due to the historic nature of the existing building materials, no reinforcing will be able
to match the existing construction; likely large structural steel columns and bracing would be required.
Construction of the permanent reinforcing will likely require modification or temporary removal of the existing stairs.
Construction of the temporary support during construction and construction of the permanent reinforcing required
will be extremely difficult and could potentially damage the existing structure. The fagade of the tower may be
changed after construction resulting from the connections of the temporary and permanent bracing. From a cost,
constructability, and construction safety standpoint, it is our opinion that it is better to carefully remove the tower
finishes and reconstruct the tower using modern materials and construction practices.
If you would like SBM to complete a further analysis including review of seismic resistance, please do not hesitate to
contact us.
www.sbmltd.ca
4 LIMITATIONS
SBM W-20-397
• This report is intended exclusively for the Client(s) named in the report. The material in it reflects our bestjudgment
in light of the information reviewed by Strik Baldinelli Moniz at the time of preparation. No portion of this report
may be used as a separate entity, it is written to be read in its entirety.
• Any use which a third party makes of this report, or any reliance on or decisions to be made based on it, are
the responsibility of such third parties.
• Only the specific information identified has been reviewed. The consultant is not obligated to identify mistakes or
insufficiencies in the information obtained from the various sources or to verify the accuracy of the information.
The Consultant may use such specific information obtained in performing its services and is entitled to rely upon
the accuracy and completeness thereof.
• This assessment does not wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for existing or future costs,
hazards or losses in connection with a property. No site inspections, physical or destructive testing and no
design calculations have been performed unless specifically recorded. Conditions existing but not recorded
were not apparent given the level of study undertake We can perform further investigation on items of
concern if so required.
• We accept no responsibility for any decisions made or acti taken as a result of this report unless we are
specifically advised of and participate in such action, in whic se our responsibility will be as agreed to at
that time. Any user of this report specifically denies a t t claims against the Consultant, Sub -
Consultants, their Officers, Agents and Employelki ces the fee paid for professional services.
We trust this report meets your satisfa
Respectfully submitted,
Strik, Baldinelli, Mo
Planning • Civil • Structural • Mechanic:
youLgjfuctheVElarification, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Darryl Cowan, P.Eng
Associate II
www.sbmltd.ca
APPENDIX A
REFERENCE
SBM W-20-397
www.sbmltd.ca
ev-Plan of Site
l!
Figure 2 —The front elevation of the building, viewed from the north west.
SBM W-20-397
6
www.sbmltd.ca
m
RE
Figure 3
existing front stair tower.
IF
SBM W-20-397
T`An
Figure 4 — East side of the building showing the south-east corner of the stair tower above the building roof line.
7
www.sbmltd.ca
SBM W-20-397
Figure 6 — South-east corner of the stair tower above the building roof. Note the joint between brick veneer (rear) and
concrete panel veneer (side).
8
www.sbmltd.ca
Figure 7 — Interic
ollow clay block.
Figure 8 —Typical steel stairs with concrete topping.
SBM W-20-397
www.sbmltd.ca
SBM W-20-397
Figure 10 — South-west foundation wall below the stair tower, viewed from the basement of the adjacent building.
10
Heritage Impact Assessment
1001-1051 King Street East and 530-564 Charles Street East, City of Kitchener
Appendix D
Curriculum Vitae (next page)
November2021 MHBC 161
EDUCATION
2oo6
Masters of Arts (Planning)
University of Waterloo
1.998
Bachelor of Environmental Studies
University of Waterloo
CURRICULUMVITAE
Dan Currie, MA, MCIP, RPP, CAHP
Dan Currie, a Partner and Managing Director of MHBC's Cultural Heritage Division,
joined MHBC Planning in 2oo9, after having worked in various positions in the
public sector since 1.997. Dan provides a Variety of planning services for public and
private sector clients including a ,wide range of cultural heritage policy and
planning work including strategic pla,nrting, heritage policy, heritage conservation
district studies and plans, heritage master plans, cultural heritage evaluations,
heritage impact assessments and cultural heritage landscape studies.
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS
1.998
Bachelor of Arts (Art History) Full Member, Canadian Institute of Planners
University of Saskatchewan Full Member, Ontario Professional Planners Institute
Profe I Member, Canadian Association of Heritage Professionals
CT EXPERIENCE
AI Herigage Conservation District Study, Caledon (underway)
Po anley Heritage Conservation District Plan (underway)
P Credit Heritage Conservation District Plan, Mississauga
wn of Cobourg Heritage Conservation District Plan updates
Rondeau Heritage Conservation District Study & Plan, Chatham Kent,
Barriefield Heritage Conservation District Plan Update, Kingston
Victoria Square Heritage Conservation District Study, Markham
Bala Heritage Conservation District Study and Plan, Township of Muskoka Lakes
Downtown Meaford Heritage Conservation District Study and Plan
Brooklyn and College Hill Heritage Conservation District Plan, Guelph
Garden District Heritage Conservation District Study and Plan, Toronto
Heritage Master Plans and Management Plans
City of Guelph Cultural Heritage Action Plan
Town of Cobourg Heritage Master Plan
Burlington Heights Heritage Lands Management Plan
CONTACT
City of London Western Counties Cultural Heritage Plan
54o Bingemans Centre Drive,
suite 200
Cultural Heritage Evaluations
Kitchener, ON NzB 3X9
MacDonald Mowatt House, University of Toronto
T 519 576 3650 X 744
F 519 576 0121
dcurrie@mhbcplan.com
www.mhbcplan.com
CONTACT
54o Bingemans Centre Drive,
Suite 200
Kitchener, ON NzB 3X9
T 519 576 3650 X 744
F 519 576 0121
dcurrie@mhbcplan.com
www.mhbcplan.com
CURRICULUMVITAE
Dan Currie, MA, MCIP, RPP, CAHP
City of Kitchener Heritage Property Inventory Update
Niagara Parks Commission Queen Victoria Park Cultural Heritage Evaluation
Designation of Main Street Presbyteriarhurch, Town of Erin
Designation of St Johns Anglican Church, Norwich
Cultural Heritage Landscape evaluation', former Burlingham Farmstead, Prince
Edward County
Heritage Impact Assessments
Heritage Impact Assessment for Pier 8, Hamilton
Homer Watson House Heritage Impact Assessment, Kitchener
Expansion of Schneider Haus National Historic Site, Kitchener
Redevelopment of former industrial facility, 57 Lakeport Road, Port Dalhousie
Redevelopment of former amusement park, Boblo Island
Redevelopment of historic Waterloo Post Office
Redevelopment of former Brick Brewery, Waterloo
Redevelopment of former American Standard factory, Cambridge
Redevelopment of former Goldie and McCullough factory, Cambridge
Mount Pleasant Islamic Centre, Brampton
Demolition of former farmhouse at 1.0536 McCowan Road, Markham
Heritage Assessments for Infrastructure Projects and Environmental Assessments
Heritage Assessment of 1.o Bridges within Rockcliffe Special Policy Area, Toronto
heim Road Realignment Collector Road EA, Cambridge
dley Bridge EA, Elora
Black Bridge Road EA, Cambridge
Heritage and Cultural Heritage Landscape Assessment of Twenty Mile Creek Arch
Bridge, Town of Lincoln
Heritage Evaluation of Deer River, Girven, Burnt Dam and Macintosh Bridges,
Peterborough County
Conservation Plans
Black Bridge Strategic Conservation Plan, Cambridge
Conservation Plan for Log house, Beurgetz Ave, Kitchener
Conservation and Construction Protection Plan - 54 Margaret Avenue, Kitchener
is
CONTACT
54o Bingemans Centre Drive,
Suite 200
Kitchener, ON NzB 3X9
T 519 576 3650 X 744
F 519 576 0121
dcurrie@mhbcplan.com
www.mhbcplan.com
CURRICULUMVITAE
Dan Currie, MA, MCIP, RPP, CAHP
Tribunal Hearings: Local Planning Appeal Tribunal & Conservation Review Board
Port Credit Heritage Conservation District (LPAT)
Demolition 1.74 St Paul Street (Collingwod Heritage District) (LPAT)
Brooklyn and College Hill HCD Plan T)
Rondeau HCD Plan (LPAT)
Designation of io8 Moore Stree rad CRB)
Redevelopment of property at 64 Grand A ambridge (LPAT)
Youngblood subdivision ra (LPAT)
Designation of St Joh r> rch, r ich (CRIB - underway)
MASTER
JEGIES AND POLICY STUDIES
Township of Wesi n Ea�mithville Secondary Plan
Town of Frontena ands Marysville Secondary Plan
Niagara -on -the -La orridor Design Guidelines
Cambridge West Master Environmental Servicing Plan
Township of West Lincoln Settlement Area Expansion Analysis
Ministry of Infrastructure Review of Performance Indicators for the Growth Plan
Township of Tiny Residential Land Use Study
Port Severn Settlement Area Boundary Review
City of Cambridge Green Building Policy
Township of West Lincoln Intensification Study & Employment Land Strategy
Ministry of the Environment Review of the D -Series Land Use Guidelines
Meadowlands Conservation Area Management Plan
City of Cambridge Trails Master Plan
City of Kawartha Lakes Growth Management Strategy
DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
Provide consulting services and prepare planning applications for private sector
clients for:
• Draft plans of subdivision
• Consent
• Official Plan Amendment
• Zoning By-law Amendment
• Minor Variance
• Site Plan
EDUCATION
2016
Master of Arts in Planning,
specializing in Heritage
Planning
University of Waterloo,
School of Planning
2010
Bachelor of Arts (Honours)
in Historical/Industrial
Archaeology
Wilfrid Laurier University
CREDENTIALS
Canadian Association of
Heritage Professionals (ful
member)
CONTACT
540 Bingemans Centre Drive,
Suite 200
Kitchener, ON N2B 3X9
T 519 576 3650 x 728
F 519 576 0121
vhicks@mhbcplan.com
www.mhbcplan.com
CU RRICU LU MVITAE
Vanessa Hicks, M.A., c.A.H.P.
Associate
Vanessa Hicks is a Senior Heritage Planner and Associate with MHBC. Vanessa
and joined the firm after having g experience as a Manager of Heritage
Planning in the public realm she was responsible for working with
Heritage Advisory Committ in aging heritage resources, Heritage
Conservation Districts, designations, spe vents and heritage projects.
Vanessa is a full memer of the Canadian As ciation of Heritage Professionals
(CAHP) and graduated from the University of Waterloo with a Masters Degree
in Planning, specializing. ` heritage planning and conservation. Vanessa
provides a variety of research report writing services for public and private
sector clients. She has experience in historical research, inventory work,
evaluation and analysis on a variety of projects, including Heritage
Conservation Districts (HCDs), Heritage Impact Assessments (HIAs), Cultural
4leritage Evaluatior�Reports (CHERs), Conservation Plans (CPS), Documentation
and Salvage Reports, and Commemoration Projects (i.e. plaques).
FESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
2016- Cultural Heritage Specialist/ Heritage Planner
nt MacNaughton Hermsen Britton Clarkson Planning Ltd.
2012- Program Manager, Heritage Planning
2016 Town of Aurora
May 2012 - Heritage Planning Assistant
October 2012 Town of Grimsby
2007- Archaeologist
2010 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd.
1
200-540 BINGEMANS CENTRE DRIVE KITCHENER / ONTARIO /N2B3X9 / T:519.576.3650 / F:519-576-0121 / WWW.MHBCPLAN.COM
III
MHBC
PLANNING
URBAN DESIGN
& LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECTURE